What Are the Differences Between Highlighted Topics and Funding Opportunities?

Applicants, take advantage of this overview to learn how NIH Highlighted Topics differ from Notices of Funding Opportunities (NOFOs). There are significant distinctions that you should understand when planning a project for your next application.

Highlighted Topics are a communication tool to promote a particular area of science within the NIH mission and encourage investigator-initiated applications from the community. They provide quick, simple information that is specific to the research topic area.

In contrast to NOFOs, Highlighted Topics:

  • Give the applicant more freedom and creativity in responding to a topic.
    • Are less prescriptive than a science-specific NOFO.
    • Do not direct the applicant to use a particular NOFO, a particular due date or budget, or set other eligibility or application criteria.
    • Provide topic inspiration. Applicants use an appropriate funding opportunity, such as one of the NIH Parent Funding Announcements or other broad NIH opportunities on Grants.gov.
  • Are not funding opportunities. NIH may or may not have dedicated funding for applications in any given topic area.
  • Do not impact referral or peer review of applications.
  • Expire after 1 year. However, NIH may choose to update or renew a topic.

Highlighted topics and NOFOs are two ways to find a good fit at NIH for your research idea. Find more advice at Find Your Opportunity.

Resources

Categories: Tips Before You Submit

Related News

What Is the Difference Between an NIH Institute, Center, or Office’s Highlighted Topic and General Interest Area?

NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices (ICOs) communicate their research priorities through a variety of channels. For example, general interest areas may be discussed on an ICOs’ profile page or they may be expressed through a specific Highlighted Topic. In any case, the ICO may fund research in a wide range of scientific areas within their mission, whether or not they are explicitly identified as a particular Highlighted Topic.

You Ask, We Answer

Clarifying Percent Effort and Support for Career Development (K) Award Recipients

For most career development (K) award programs, the K award recipient must commit at the minimum 9 person months, equivalent to 75% full-time professional effort, directly to their research project and career development activities. The recipient can devote the remaining effort (up to 25%) to additional research, teaching, clinical work, or other efforts complementary to their career development.

You Ask, We Answer

For technical issues E-mail OER Webmaster