COVID-19

Expand for resources

n/a Warning! This browser is not supported - Some features might not work. Try using a different browser such as Chrome, Edge, Firefox, or Safari.

Skip to main content

You are here

Know Assignment Role

 
NIH peer reviewers may have different responsibilities at review meetings depending on their roles. Please check with your SRO.

 

Primary/Reviewer 1, Secondary/Reviewer 2 and Tertiary/Reviewer 3 (sometimes also designated as Discussant):

  • Review your assigned applications
  • Write and submit critiques and scores for assigned applications
  • Read critiques from other assigned reviewers
  • Be prepared to discuss the score driving strengths and weaknesses

Discussant

  • Read and understand the critiques of the assigned applications
  • Provide a short written review if the SRO asks for one

Mail-In Reviewer

  • Check with your SRO
  • Provide a written critique for the applications assigned and maybe submit preliminary criterion and/or impact scores.

Chair

  • Review the abstract and aims of all applications, and discuss any issues or changes in review policy/guidelines with the SRO
  • Write critiques and submit scores for the specific applications assigned to them (can be Reviewer 1, 2 or 3 for any given assignment)
  • Follow up on any other chair-specific instructions provided by the SRO

Resources

This page last updated on June 30, 2016
Technical Issues: E-mail OER Webmaster