What Study Information Should Be Included on a ClinicalTrials.gov Entry?

A ClinicalTrials.gov study record is intended to summarize key information from a study’s protocol and the study’s findings. The study sponsor or investigator is responsible for ensuring that their studies follow all applicable laws and regulations and for submitting complete, accurate, and up-to-date information about their study. 

Key information when registering a study:

  • Eligibility criteria describing who can participate
  • A description of the interventions under study
  • Study design information (such as the study type and how participants are assigned to interventions)
  • Primary and secondary outcome measures
  • Current status and key dates
  • Contact information and study site locations

When a study is completed, results information is submitted and added to the same study record, including:

  • Participant flow
  • Baseline characteristics
  • Outcome data
  • Adverse events

The summary information is similar to content expected in publications, without the narrative summaries or interpretation of findings. 

Disclosing study information in a timely manner:

  • Provides accountability to the prespecified research design and outcomes when researchers report trial results
  • Allows identification and analysis of all relevant trials within a research domain
  • Supports participant enrollment  
  • Fulfills obligations to research participants that their contributions will advance science
  • Aids in countering publication bias and selective reporting
  • Facilitates systematic reviews and meta-analyses that utilize the evidence base and advance public health
  • Prevents unnecessary duplication of research
  • Promotes research collaboration

Additional Resources:

Categories: You Ask, We Answer

Related News

What We Heard From You Regarding the Proposed Cap on Simultaneous NIH Research Project Grant Support, and Our Next Steps

In June, we sought your feedback on a proposed approach to cap the number of Research Project Grants (RPG) a researcher can be principal investigator on simultaneously (NOT-OD-26-086). The proposal explored whether limits on simultaneous RPG support could contribute to a more balanced research portfolio. Here, we share some high-level outcomes from your thoughtful and helpful comments, which will inform our next steps.

Top Stories

Why Does It Take Time After Advisory Council for NIH to Make a Funding Decision

We recognize it is stressful for researchers when waiting on NIH’s funding decision for submitted applications. After going through initial peer review, NIH Institute, Center, or Office (ICO) Advisory Councils review applications and make recommendations for the Institute or Center director’s consideration.

You Ask, We Answer

For technical issues E-mail OER Webmaster