When Will NIH Contact You Regarding a Missing Attachment?

NIH may contact the applicant in very specific, select situations when it identifies required attachments that are missing in an application. As explained on NOT-OD-26-025, NIH might request limited missing materials on a case-by-case basis only as an alternative to the withdrawal of substantially complete applications by NIH. Applicants who identify omissions must not contact NIH directly. 

Our goal is to ensure submitted applications go through review whenever possible. We recognize there may be situations where a required attachment may have been unintentionally omitted. When NIH requests the missing attachment instead of withdrawing the application, it can save applicants the unnecessary time and effort of resubmitting at a later date.

If identified, NIH may contact the applicant to request submission of required attachments, such as Foreign component justifications or Institutional support or eligibility letters required in certain NOFOs.

NIH will not accept:

  • Revised, corrected, or replacement materials, files, or attachments (e.g., requesting changes to a research strategy, budget, or biosketch).
  • Unsolicited materials.
  • Applicant requests to provide or replace materials.

When NIH identifies an application missing a required attachment after submission:

  • NIH would contact the Principal Investigator and the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) listed in the application.
  • The AOR must then provide the requested attachment as a pdf within the designated timeframe to ensure the application can be reviewed. The pdf is uploaded to the grant folder as “Additions for Review” to become part of the official application material.
  • Applicants should not contact NIH directly. 

Editor's Note: This article was updated on April 30, 2026.

 

Categories: You Ask, We Answer

Related News

An Update on How NIH Protects NIH-Funded Research from Undue Foreign Interference

NIH has advanced initiatives to strengthen transparency and ensure disclosure of other support. These actions build on prior work to address risks associated with foreign interference while reinforcing that honesty, transparency, and funding‑overlap prevention remain non‑negotiable requirements.

Top Stories

Embedding Replication and Reproducibility Throughout NIH Research: Key Reminders for Applications, Awards, and a New Highlighted Topic

The reliability of biomedical research is foundational to public trust in science and to ensuring that findings can benefit patients and communities. NIH’s Gold Standard Science plan advances this commitment by encouraging a culture that values replication and reproducibility. In support of this plan, NIH has launched a new Replication and Reproducibility Initiative to drive, incentivize and institutionalize replication and reproducibility efforts across the biomedical research enterprise.

Top Stories

For technical issues E-mail OER Webmaster