When Will NIH Contact You Regarding a Missing Attachment?

NIH may contact the applicant in very specific, select situations when it identifies required attachments that are missing in an application. As explained on NOT-OD-26-025, NIH might request limited missing materials on a case-by-case basis only as an alternative to the withdrawal of substantially complete applications by NIH. Applicants who identify omissions must not contact NIH directly. 

Our goal is to ensure submitted applications go through review whenever possible. We recognize there may be situations where a required attachment may have been unintentionally omitted. When NIH requests the missing attachment instead of withdrawing the application, it can save applicants the unnecessary time and effort of resubmitting at a later date.

If identified, NIH may contact the applicant to request submission of required attachments, such as Foreign component justifications or Institutional support or eligibility letters required in certain NOFOs.

NIH will not accept:

  • Revised, corrected, or replacement materials, files, or attachments (e.g., requesting changes to a research strategy, budget, or biosketch).
  • Unsolicited materials.
  • Applicant requests to provide or replace materials.

When NIH identifies an application missing a required attachment after submission:

  • NIH would contact the Principal Investigator and the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) listed in the application.
  • The AOR must then provide the requested attachment as a pdf within the designated timeframe to ensure the application can be reviewed. The pdf is uploaded to the grant folder as “Additions for Review” to become part of the official application material.
  • Applicants should not contact NIH directly. 

Editor's Note: This article was updated on April 30, 2026.

 

Categories: You Ask, We Answer

Related News

How Do I Address Potential Foreign Risks in My Small Business Program Application?

The Small Business Innovation and Economic Security Act strengthens the government’s ability to prevent adversarial nations from exploiting federally funded technologies. Here we offer a practical guide to help small businesses avoid security risks from foreign countries of concern when applying.

You Ask, We Answer

What We Heard From You Regarding the Proposed Cap on Simultaneous NIH Research Project Grant Support, and Our Next Steps

In June, we sought your feedback on a proposed approach to cap the number of Research Project Grants (RPG) a researcher can be principal investigator on simultaneously (NOT-OD-26-086). The proposal explored whether limits on simultaneous RPG support could contribute to a more balanced research portfolio. Here, we share some high-level outcomes from your thoughtful and helpful comments, which will inform our next steps.

Top Stories

For technical issues E-mail OER Webmaster