When Will NIH Contact You Regarding a Missing Attachment?

NIH may contact the applicant in very specific, select situations when it identifies required attachments that are missing in an application. As explained on NOT-OD-26-025, NIH might request limited missing materials on a case-by-case basis only as an alternative to the withdrawal of substantially complete applications by NIH. Applicants who identify omissions must not contact NIH directly. 

Our goal is to ensure submitted applications go through review whenever possible. We recognize there may be situations where a required attachment may have been unintentionally omitted. When NIH requests the missing attachment instead of withdrawing the application, it can save applicants the unnecessary time and effort of resubmitting at a later date.

If identified, NIH may contact the applicant to request submission of required attachments, such as Foreign component justifications or Institutional support or eligibility letters required in certain NOFOs.

NIH will not accept:

  • Revised, corrected, or replacement materials, files, or attachments (e.g., requesting changes to a research strategy, budget, or biosketch).
  • Unsolicited materials.
  • Applicant requests to provide or replace materials.

When NIH identifies an application missing a required attachment after submission:

  • NIH would contact the Principal Investigator and the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) listed in the application.
  • The AOR must then provide the requested attachment as a pdf within the designated timeframe to ensure the application can be reviewed. The pdf is uploaded to the grant folder as “Additions for Review” to become part of the official application material.
  • Applicants should not contact NIH directly. 

Editor's Note: This article was updated on April 30, 2026.

 

Categories: You Ask, We Answer

Related News

What We Heard From You Regarding the Proposed Cap on Simultaneous NIH Research Project Grant Support, and Our Next Steps

In June, we sought your feedback on a proposed approach to cap the number of Research Project Grants (RPG) a researcher can be principal investigator on simultaneously (NOT-OD-26-086). The proposal explored whether limits on simultaneous RPG support could contribute to a more balanced research portfolio. Here, we share some high-level outcomes from your thoughtful and helpful comments, which will inform our next steps.

Top Stories

Why Does It Take Time After Advisory Council for NIH to Make a Funding Decision

We recognize it is stressful for researchers when waiting on NIH’s funding decision for submitted applications. After going through initial peer review, NIH Institute, Center, or Office (ICO) Advisory Councils review applications and make recommendations for the Institute or Center director’s consideration.

You Ask, We Answer

For technical issues E-mail OER Webmaster