An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Dr. David Armstrong, Chief of the Review Branch, and Dr. Mike Sesma, a Program Officer, both with the National Institute of Mental Health, who discuss what is included in the summary statement and give tips for finding out more information in “Summary Statement Basics.”
Taking a short break from our “preparing a successful application series,” we delve into when and why your budget might be cut. NIH recently announced across the board cuts for all our non-competing awards to meet our 2011 budget, but why do competing award budgets get reduced? Listen for more details.
Our latest episode features Dr. Sally Amero, NIH’s Review Policy Officer, explaining when you can appeal the initial peer review of your application and what you can expect if you file a formal appeal.
Have you ever wondered why your grant application must undergo a separate round of peer review—even after a panel of experts initially weighed in on its scientific merit and provided a score to consider when making funding decisions?
Confidentiality is at the core of ensuring research ideas submitted in grant applications are protected.
In this next installment of the NIH’s All About Grants podcast series, we talk about how NIH manages conflicts of interest to ensure that we maintain integrity throughout the peer review process (MP3 / Transcript).
In the latest NIH All About Grants podcast, we talk to Dr. Cathie Cooper, Director of the Division of Receipt and Referral at NIH’s Center of Scientific Review, about how you can influence the assignment of your application to a particular study section for peer review, or to a particular NIH Institute or Center for funding consideration.
Two NIH program officers join us in this NIH All About Grants podcast to discuss what should be considered when deciding whether or not to resubmit an application.
