Continuous Submission only applies to R01, R21, and R34 applications; applications using other mechanisms (e.g. R03, or R15) are NOT eligible for Continuous Submission. The application must be submitted under an FOA (Funding Opportunity Announcement) that uses Standard Due Dates. Since RFA FOAs do not use Standard Due Dates, applications in response to an RFA are not eligible for Continuous Submission. At least one of the PD/PIs on the application must be eligible for Continuous Submission at the time of submission.
Appointed members of standing NIH study sections, NIH Boards of Scientific Counselors, NIH Advisory Boards or Councils, or NIH Program Advisory Committees are all eligible for Continuous Submission. Reviewers who have served on at least 6 qualifying NIH study sections during an 18-month period starting January 1 of one year and ending June 30 of the following year are also eligible for Continuous Submission under the Recent Substantial Service option.
Appointed regular members of standing study sections generally have made a four- or six-year commitment to participate in three or two meetings a year. They are nominated by the Scientific Review Officer of the study section and appointed by the Director, NIH, or the Director, NCI (for NCI Study Sections). Appointed regular members are automatically eligible for Continuous Submission through the term of their appointment. To check on your eligibility status as a regular member, contact your Scientific Review Officer or check the list posted at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/continuous_submission.htm.
Appointed regular members of these standing NIH committees generally have a four-year commitment involving two or three meetings a year. They are nominated by the Executive Secretary of the committee and appointed by the Director, NIH, the Director, NCI, or the Secretary, DHHS. Appointed regular members are automatically eligible for Continuous Submission through the term of their appointment. To check on your eligibility status as a regular member, contact your Executive Secretary or check the list posted at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/continuous_submission.htm.
Temporary or ad hoc members of study sections have made a commitment to serve in one meeting of either a permanent study section or a Special Emphasis Panel. Temporary or ad hoc members are not appointed by the Director, NIH. Temporary or ad hoc members of a study section, NIH Board of Scientific Counselors, NIH Advisory Board or Council, or NIH Program Advisory Committee are NOT automatically eligible for Continuous Submission.
Recent substantial service is defined as service as an appointed, temporary, or ad hoc reviewer on a qualifying NIH study section on at least six different dates in a specific 18 month period that starts each year on January 1 and ends June 30 of the following year. Eligibility is calculated in July of the second year, and qualifying reviewers become eligible starting August 1st of that year through September 30th of the following year. For example, reviewers who reviewed in six different NIH study section meetings between 1/1/2015 – 6/30/2016 are eligible for continuous submission between 8/01/2016 – 9/30/2017. The table below shows the present and upcoming 18-month windows.
Not all “review” meetings count toward recent substantial service. The vast majority of NIH study section meetings that review grants and/or contracts will qualify. However, the following do not count towards eligibility based on the Recent Substantial Service option:
a) Workgroups that do not generate final scores on applications.
b) Loan Repayment Program evaluation meetings.
c) Meetings that are not documented through the NIH Committee Management system.
d) Temporary or ad hoc service on an NIH Board of Scientific Counselors.
e) Temporary or ad hoc service on an NIH Advisory Board or Council.
f) Temporary or ad hoc service on an NIH Program Advisory Committee.
g) Review for other agencies or foundations.
h) There are a number of other NIH committees, such as DSMBs, that are not Peer Review study section meetings, do not generate final scores on applications and therefore do not count toward Continuous Submission eligibility.
If you have a question about whether a specific review meeting qualifies, please contact your Scientific Review Officer, or email the CSR Continuous Submission Committee at: CSR.email@example.com.
Yes, temporary service as an attending reviewer, telephone reviewer, Internet Assisted Meeting reviewer, Video Assisted Meeting reviewer, or mail reviewer on an NIH study section counts toward Recent Substantial Service.
In general, no - Multiple meetings that occur on the same day are generally related meetings with considerable overlap in reviewers and NIH review staff; these distinct meetings are set up as separate meetings to deal with specific conflict issues, or to allow the review of different funding mechanisms in separate meetings. However, if a reviewer participates in two unrelated meetings on the same day, credit may be given for both meetings. For all reviews, including mail review, the effective date of service is the actual meeting date, not the date the critiques were submitted. If you have a question about whether two review meetings on the same date qualify, please contact the CSR Continuous Submission Committee at: CSR.firstname.lastname@example.org.
In order to assist NIH in identifying these applications, a cover letter isrequired. Please clearly identify the study section, Council, Board, or other Advisory Group on which you serve and the period of your service, or clearly state that you are eligible for continuous submission based on Recent Substantial Service.
No, Continuous Submission applies to new applications, resubmissions (A1), competing renewals (type 2), and revisions (type 3) for R01, R21, and R34 activity codes submitted in response to an FOA (Funding Opportunity Announcement) that uses Standard Due Dates.
If an application has Multiple PD/PIs, and any of the PD/PIs is eligible for continuous submission, the application is eligible for continuous submission. Note: having a co-investigator or collaborator who is eligible for continuous submission does not make the application eligible for continuous submission; the eligible reviewer must be in a PD/PI position on the application.
Yes - each of the related applications must have at least one PD/PI who is eligible for continuous submission and all applications must be submitted at the same time in order for the applications to be eligible for continuous submission. If any of the related applications does not have a PD/PI who is eligible, then all the applications should be submitted for the due date for that FOA (Funding Opportunity Announcement).
This is an NIH-wide effort. Whether your application is in an area normally reviewed by a CSR study section or by an IC study section, your application can be submitted under the continuous submission policy if you are eligible.
If your eligibility results from an appointment to an NIH Study Section or other NIH Advisory Group, your continuous submission eligibility is extended by six weeks from the date your term expires; your application must be successfully submitted by that end date to be accepted as a continuous submission application.
If your eligibility results from recent substantial service (having served as an NIH reviewer six times in the specified 18 month time period), you must successfully submit your application by September 30 of the following year.
For example, if your appointment as a regular member of a study section ends on June 30, 2017, you must successfully submit your application by August 16, 2017, to be considered eligible for Continuous Submission. Any applications submitted after August 16, 2017 must be submitted for the Standard Due Dates.
According to the current NIH policy (NOT-OD-17-042), continuous submission-eligible applications may be reviewed in a standing study section if an appropriate study section is not in conflict with the application, at the IRG/Review Chief’s discretion. However, the closer the submission date is to the Advisory Council-dictated deadlines (below in #19), the more likely it becomes that the application will need to be assigned to a Special Emphasis Panel in order to be reviewed in a timely manner.
Continuous submission-eligible PD/PIs who want to submit applications that are not eligible for Continuous Submission (NOT standard due date, or NOT: R01, R21, or R34) must submit within the two week late window of consideration per the late policy (NOT-OD-15-039).
Continuous Submission applications will be assigned to an Advisory Council/Board round according to the following table:
Submitted for these Standard Due Dates
Application Receipt Period
Advisory Council Round
August 17 – December 16
October 8 – February 7
December 17 – April 16
February 8 – June 7
April 17- August 16
June 8 – October 7
As an example, applications submitted for the October/November due dates go to the May Council Round. A continuous submission application successfully submitted by December 16 will also be reviewed in time for the May Council; applications submitted after December 16 will be assigned to the next Council Round (October). A continuous submission AIDS-related application successfully submitted by February 7 would also go to the May Council round.
The most common mechanism for extending Continuous Submission eligibility is through the Recent Substantial Service policy. Taking the example of an appointed member of a standing study section who is set to retire on 6/30/2017, with continuous submission eligibility ending on 8/16/2017: If that reviewer has participated in all of the meetings for that study section for the past 18 months, the reviewer will have 5 qualifying meetings between 1/1/2016 - 6/30/2017. Serving as a temporary or ad hoc reviewer on one additional meeting in that 18-month window would satisfy the Recent Substantial Service requirement of at least 6 meetings, and that reviewer’s Continuous Submission eligibility would then be extended to 9/30/2018.
Yes. If you are eligible for Continuous Submission, you are also eligible for the two-week Late Window of Consideration after the application due date even if you haven’t reviewed within two months of the due date (See NOT-OD-15-039 for more information about the Late Window of Consideration). You must include a cover letter stating that, while your application is late, you qualify for Continuous Submission and are requesting that your application still be accepted. For this, your application must be successfully submitted within two weeks of the Due Date. A late window cannot be used to extend the Application Receipt Periods shown above for assignment to Advisory Council rounds. Note: the Late Window of Consideration applies to all FOAs (Funding Opportunity Announcements), unless the FOA specifically states that late applications will not be accepted.