EXPIRED
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
U24 Resource-Related Research Projects – Cooperative Agreements
See Part 2, Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
This notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) seeks applications for a Data and Analytics Coordinating Center (DACC) to support the activities of a cooperative multi-site Viral Infections in the Young Lung (VINYL) consortium. The VINYL Consortium will be established through this NOFO and a companion funding opportunity (see RFA-HL-26-006) that seeks applications through a UG3/UH3 award mechanism for a single Clinical Coordinating Center (CCC), 5 clinical centers (CCs) and 1 Biorepository. Both funding opportunities will be submitted as companion applications with the same submission date.
The VINYL Consortium seeks to understand the heterogeneity and underlying mechanisms of viral lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in hospitalized young children between 0–2 years of age, and their impact on pulmonary outcomes at pre-school age. This will be accomplished through a prospective, longitudinal observational cohort study performing deep phenotyping at the time of enrollment (upon hospitalization) with common data and biospecimen collection from 1500 young children with respiratory viral infections and one or more of the following diagnoses: bronchiolitis, pneumonia and pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). The cohort will be maintained with follow-up 6 months post-discharge and phenotyping for pulmonary status at age 4–5 years. Enrollment of a control population (if required to address the research question(s)) is allowable and encouraged. This may be accomplished by leveraging populations from contemporaneous networks and/or ongoing studies that could serve as comparator controls.The longitudinal follow-up may employ a novel ‘hybrid cohort model, using questionnaires and electronic health records, along with in-person visits. The 6-month post-discharge visit and one visit at 4–5 years of age are required. The DACC will support clinical activities, coordinate harmonization of data ingestion and creation of the data platform for data management and analysis, and assist with pre-screening activities, site activation, enrollment, and cohort retention. The DACC will facilitate the activities of the Biorepository by the creation of links to the inventory of biospecimens that will be stored and managed by the Biorepository, a part of the CCC funded by the companion NOFO. Throughout the programs funding period, the DACC will be responsible for data (including imaging data) being made available as a resource to the broader research community as rapidly and simply as possible utilizing a publicly accessible platform.
The Division of Lung Diseases supports research and research training on the causes, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung diseases and sleep disorders. Research is funded through investigator-initiated and Institute-initiated grant programs and through contract programs in areas including asthma, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, respiratory neurobiology, sleep and circadian biology, sleep-disordered breathing, critical care and acute lung injury, developmental biology and pediatric pulmonary diseases, immunologic and fibrotic pulmonary disease, rare lung disorders, pulmonary vascular disease, and pulmonary complications of AIDS and tuberculosis.
Not Applicable.
| Application Due Dates | Review and Award Cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New | Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) | AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed | Scientific Merit Review | Advisory Council Review | Earliest Start Date |
| November 10, 2025 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | March 2026 | May 2026 | July 2026 |
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Not Applicable
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the How to Apply - Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the How to Apply - Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.
Background
Bronchiolitis, a condition unique to the young lung, is the leading cause of hospitalization for viral lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in 0–2-year-old children, including those born preterm. There are critical knowledge gaps in defining the condition, predicting its severity, and understanding the reasons for hospitalization, including the immature host respiratory immune response to viral infection, heterogeneity in response to different viruses, current interventions, practice variation in diagnosis and management, and subsequent long-term impact on lung health. To address these needs and begin to move toward precision-based therapies, the Viral Infections in the Young Lung (VINYL) Consortium will conduct a deep phenotyping study of 1500 0-2 year old participants hospitalized in the United States with viral LRTI – bronchiolitis, pneumonia and/or Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PARDS), collect data and biospecimens to build a multidimensional database of this cohort that will be followed longitudinally until the age of 4–5 years, and thus elucidate the pathobiology and impact of early hospitalization for viral LRTI on lung and airways health at pre-school age. This will create the largest multidimensional and publicly accessible database to characterize this unique population and elucidate mechanisms and heterogeneity of host responses to Viral Infections in the Young Lung.
Purpose and Objectives
The purpose of the VINYL initiative is to establish a cooperative consortium funded for up to seven years under the UG3/UH3 phased award for a Clinical Coordinating Center (CCC, RFA-HL-26-006) and a companion U24 award for a Data and Analytics Coordinating Center (DACC). This NOFO seeks applications to support the Data and Analytics Coordinating Center (DACC) that will facilitate site activation, harmonization of research activities, and uniform data collection and ingestion across all centers and sites, in order to build a live publicly accessible database. Further, the DACC will assist the Clinical Coordinating Center (CCC) and Clinical Centers (CCs) in cohort retention, remote and in-person follow-up activities, incorporating the inventory of the Biorepository into the database, and facilitating acquisition of biospecimens by providing links for applicants to apply to the Biorepository for issue of biospecimens. The VINYL Consortium will bring together five CCs (each made up of one main site and 1-3 optional sub-sites, funded under the companion RFA-HL-26-006) led by the CCC - which also serves as one of the CCs - to form a cooperative research platform. The platform will include the Consortium-wide longitudinal cohort study with deep phenotyping of participants at the time of enrollment (hospitalization), and facilitate mechanistic studies, focused on viral respiratory infections in young children between 0–2 years of age. The VINYL Consortium DACC will be supported by project scientists from the NHLBI and other Institutes and Centers (ICs) at NIH as needed, a NHLBI statistician as well as an NHLBI-appointed independent Observational and Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). In addition, NHLBI will assemble a research advisory board comprised of multidisciplinary experts: the VINYL Advisory Board (VAB).
It is anticipated that each CC will enroll at least 300 participants over years 2, 3 and 4 of the award for a total of 1500 participants. Enrollment of participants early in their hospital course is encouraged. Participants will be followed longitudinally with an evaluation at 6 months post-discharge and retention of the cohort with follow-up, remote or in-person. An in-person visit is required at age 4–5 years.
The Consortium-wide longitudinal cohort study (including deep phenotyping to characterize the cohort at the time of enrollment) protocol will be determined by a Steering Committee comprised of the CCC Principal investigator (PI)(s), CC Investigators, Biorepository co-investigator (when applicable), DACC PI(s), a Steering Committee Chair (appointed by NHLBI), NHLBI statistician and NIH program staff during the first year of the program. The Steering Committee will lead all protocol development and review enrollment and study conduct, applications for ancillary studies, publications and oversight of the policies and procedures throughout the duration of the study. Hypothesis-driven scientific questions during the hospital and post-hospital period may be assessed through data, imaging, and/or biospecimens collected through the Consortium-wide longitudinal cohort study protocol. The Consortium seeks to answer questions such as:
Throughout the programs funding period, data (including imaging data) and biospecimens that are collected will be made available as a resource to the broader research community as rapidly as possible with processes for data sharing that are simple and achievable. Data and biospecimens will be collected with forward-looking data sharing policies compatible with broad consent to enable future research studies by others, both within and outside the Consortium. The process for sharing data and biospecimens throughout the programs funding period with the broader research community will be developed in the first 6 months, consistent with NHLBI policies for deposition into NHLBI BioData Catalyst and BioLINCC. Data and biospecimens are expected to be shared as rapidly as possible, with an estimate of the frequency of uploads (e.g., every 6 months or every year) provided in the application. Wherever possible, the consortium will not hold data or biospecimens for its exclusive use or for the exclusive use of one of its components and will endeavor to make samples (including information about how the samples were obtained and processed) and data, available to the broader research community. In accordance with data and biospecimen policies set up within the first 6 months of the program, data will be deposited into NHLBIs repositories (anticipated to be BioData Catalyst) and made available for use by the research community annually and at the end of the program. All biospecimens will be deposited into NHLBI's repository (anticipated to be BioLINCC) and made available for continued use by the research community at the end of the program
Program Structure
It is anticipated that the VINYL Consortium will consist of one DACC (funded through this NOFO), and a CCC (which will include one of the five CCs and one Biorepository) funded through the companion NOFO (RFA-HL-26-006), which will include five CCs and one Biorepository, as well as a Steering Committee, an advisory board and program staff from the NHLBI and other ICs as indicated. The VINYL Consortium participants will be expected to collaborate in an interactive manner, develop and implement a consortium-wide deep phenotyping at enrollment and longitudinal cohort study, and share data (including imaging data) and biospecimens collected throughout the program's funding period with researchers within and outside the VINYL Consortium.
The first year of funding for the DACC under this NOFO will correspond to the UG3 phase of the companion UG3/UH3 CCC application (see RFA-HL-26-006). During the first year, the DACC will develop study partnerships, finalize the protocol and obtain approvals from the Data Safety and Monitoring Board and Institutional Review Board (s), establish data and project management systems and plans, and establish the web-based platform. The DACC will collaborate with the CCC and CCs to coordinate, administer, and support all VINYL Consortium administrative, governance, regulatory, analysis, reporting, dissemination, and data/biospecimen sharing activities. The DACC Principal Investigator(s) is (are) expected to share in the scientific leadership of the VINYL Consortium by participation in the Steering Committee. The DACC will be expected to have expertise in statistics, longitudinal cohort studies, informatics, data management (including imaging data), and biospecimen data management, and to have demonstrable interest in developing proactive policies for data sharing. The DACC is expected to provide the methodological, analytical, managerial, website, computer systems, logistical, and administrative expertise to support research and operational activities of the VINYL Consortium including, but not limited to : (1) collaborating in the design and analytic plans for the Consortium-wide longitudinal cohort protocol to be executed by all CCs; (2) manage the DACC protocol budget; (3) provide support that is flexible to enable operation and administrative activities; (4) manage and evaluate data quality and integrity, harmonize data ingestion, and provide relevant reports to the Steering Committee and DSMB; (5) provide assistance as needed for the mechanistic human studies; (6) monitor and evaluate consortium-wide longitudinal cohort protocol execution and subject accrual, and provide relevant reports to NHLBI staff, the Steering Committee and the DSMB; (7) develop procedures for quality control, training and certification, case report forms, data management, and regulatory compliance; (8) provide logistical support for meetings (in-person or virtual) and video/teleconferences of the Steering Committee and its subcommittees, and the DSMB; (9) provide support for preparing and submitting collaborative presentations and manuscripts; (10) provide support for statistical and data analyses; (11) storage, maintenance, and analysis of data (including imaging data) and biospecimens as needed for the Consortium-wide protocol; (12) oversee and facilitate data (including imaging data) and biospecimen sharing among CCs and investigators outside the Consortium; (13) create and maintain an outward facing website that is updated regularly and includes study documents (e.g., Consortium-wide protocol, informed consent forms) and information about available data and biospecimens and the process for requesting data and biospecimens during the VINYL Consortium funding period; (14) transfer data, imaging, and biospecimens to NHLBI's repositories annually (for data) and ensure that all data and biospecimens are available in NHLBI repositories at the conclusion of the program; (15) oversee a Skills Development Core that will provide skills development opportunities in the conduct of research in young hospitalized children, and the collation of data to create a live publicly accessible database contributing to the development of the next generation of researchers in clinical research and bioinformatics; (16) utilize the capabilities of the CCs to the maximum benefit of the entire Consortium; and (17) track progress of publications, and presentations of findings. Additional details regarding these areas of responsibility are described below.
Consortium-wide Deep Phenotyping at Enrollment and Longitudinal Cohort Study Protocol Development, Study Design, and Analysis
The DACC will lend study design, statistical and biomedical scientific writing expertise to the protocol development team, including assisting in the determination of study endpoints and analytical approaches and assisting in refining common data elements, the use of which are encouraged. Facilitation of protocol development meetings/teleconferences to ensure that the protocol is developed and executed within specified VINYL Consortium timelines, and review of the Consortium-wide longitudinal cohort study protocol through the Steering Committee, DSMB and other processes will be performed by the DACC. The DACC will provide documentation and categorization expertise to the Biorepository within the Clinical Coordinating Center. It is anticipated that the biospecimens collected and processing methods under the common protocol may include, but are not limited to, blood, urine, and lung specimens (e.g., sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid), and that chest X-ray or other medical images using novel imaging systems will be collected. DACC applications should plan for coordinating the prospective enrollment of 1500 U.S. 0-2 year old participants overall (anticipated to be enrolled during years 2, 3, and 4 of the award) and cohort retention plans until they reach the age of 4–5 years. This timeline is intended to provide adequate time for protocol development during the first 6-9 months of Year 1 support, enrollment and follow-up, completion of data analysis and manuscript preparation by the end of Year 7.
Data Management and Analysis
Development, maintenance, and/or refinement of data dictionaries and a 21CRF Part 11-compliant electronic data capture (EDC) system for studies conducted by the VINYL Consortium, assuring high data quality through edit/validation checks, serving as a central repository for study data including imaging data during the Consortium lifetime are DACC responsibilities. Additional DACC responsibilities are expected to include oversight of secure data storage, secure transfer of study-generated data, and coordinating applications for issue of biospecimens from the Biorepository. The DACC will be responsible for preparing confidential data analyses and providing reports as requested by the NHLBI, the Steering Committee, the VINYL Advisory Board, the DSMB, and regulatory agencies. The DACC will also be tasked to coordinate data analysis, reporting, and publishing of VINYL Consortium research in high-quality peer-reviewed journals, as they relate to the Consortium-wide longitudinal cohort study protocol and the mechanistic studies proposed by the CCC.
Data and Biospecimen Sharing
The following duties will be performed by the DACC
Skills Development Core
The DACC will direct and coordinate skills development core activities that will contribute to the development of the next generation of physician scientists and data scientists in the VINYL consortium.
The NHLBI encourages multi-PD/PI applications with at least two PD(s)/PI(s); one a senior statistician with demonstrated experience in coordinating large multi-site clinical research studies and another senior investigator with epidemiology and human subject research experience. Familiarity with and support for data and biospecimen collection for sharing purposes is desirable. Applications for the DACC may be submitted by individuals at the same institution as the CCC application, but a single individual may not be the PI on both the CCC and DACC applications.
NIH:
NHLBI will be responsible for overall support, direction and oversight of the VINYL Consortium. The NHLBI Program Office and Office of Grants Management will oversee the overall direction and progress of the VINYL Consortium. In addition to regular grant stewardship, the NHLBI Program Officer and Project Scientist (envisioned to be the same individual) will be involved substantially with the awardees as one voting member of the Steering Committee, consistent with the Cooperative Agreement mechanism. The NHLBI will appoint an independent DSMB, Steering Committee chair and an independent Advisory Board to the Institute and the VINYL investigators. Representatives from other ICs may participate as needed as non-voting members of the Steering Committee and will provide input to the NHLBI representative, when indicated, on items presented to the Steering Committee for a vote.
Steering Committee:
A Steering Committee composed of the principal investigators of the CCC and co-investigator of the Biorepository (if applicable), the DACC, CC investigators, a Steering Committee chair appointed by NHLBI, and NHLBI and other IC representatives will form the core governing body of the VINYL Consortium. All major scientific decisions will be determined by majority vote of the Steering Committee. The CCC, Biorepository co-investigator, each CC (independent of multiple PIs), the DACC, and the NHLBI will have one vote each; the Steering Committee chair will have a vote in case of a tie vote among the other Steering Committee members. It is anticipated that the Steering Committee will meet once a month by conference call and by in-person meeting once a year (with virtual meetings as an option/alternative if necessary). The Steering Committee has primary responsibility for the general organization of the VINYL Consortium, approval of the Consortium-wide longitudinal cohort study protocol and budget, including protocol revisions, before review by the DSMB, the conduct and monitoring of VINYL Consortium studies, the expeditious reporting of study results, and the rapid sharing agreements for VINYL consortium data and biospecimens. Subcommittees of the Steering Committee will be established to oversee specific functions such as protocol development and oversight, ancillary studies, publications, biorepository, and data and biospecimen sharing. The Steering Committee will monitor disclosures of financial interests and potential conflicts of interest among investigators, but such monitoring will not preclude investigators responsibility to report their financial disclosures to their respective recipient institutions. Recipient members of the Steering Committee will be required to accept and implement policies approved by the Steering Committee.
During the first 6-9 months of the U24 award to the DACC, which matches the UG3 award year (Year 1 of the companion award to the CCC), the Steering Committee (in conjunction with the CCC and with assistance from the DACC) will be responsible for developing the consortium-wide longitudinal cohort protocol that outlines standardized procedures for enrolling participants and procedures and methods for the collection of data, images, and biospecimens across all participating sites within the VINYL Consortium. It is expected that the Consortium-wide protocol may be refined iteratively over the course of the project period as new data become available. The protocol, and any subsequent changes to that protocol, in the observational component, the peer-reviewed mechanistic studies (BESH) and the longitudinal and follow-up evaluation will be voted on and must be approved by majority vote of the Steering Committee to be implemented. In addition, NHLBI will appoint an independent expert advisory board to the VINYL consortium, the VINYL Advisory Board (VAB) that may be consulted for opinions and advice. The Advisory Board will comprise a chairperson, clinicians, and scientists with expertise in infectious diseases, viral immunology, airways disease, pediatric hospital and critical medicine and pulmonology, observational study design, outcome measures, biostatistics, ethics, biospecimen collection, and other areas of expertise as needed. The Advisory Board will evaluate scientific merit, experimental design and approach, feasibility, appropriateness in the context of the VINYL Consortium program goals, and consistency with NHLBIs mission and policies.
VINYL Advisory Board (VAB)
An independent VINYL Advisory Board (VAB) will be appointed by and be advisory to the NHLBI. It will consist of a chairperson, clinicians, and scientists who are recognized as experts in viral infections in the young lung, immunology, infectious diseases, cell biology, molecular biology, observational study design, outcome measures, biostatistics, ethics, biospecimen collection, and other areas of expertise as needed. This Board may be consulted for independent advice on any aspect of the underlying science, the relevance and significance of research questions, clinical monitoring, human subject protection, policies and procedures, analysis of outcomes, and data analytics while building the VINYL consortium.
Observational Study and Data and Safety Management Board
An independent Observational and Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be appointed by and advisory to the NHLBI. The DSMB will be responsible for providing independent advice to the NHLBI regarding study safety and related ethical considerations, the observational deep phenotyping study, the longitudinal cohort study, the progress of the basic experimental studies in humans (BESH), and the appropriateness of continuing the studies performed by the VINYL Consortium. The DSMB will also review and, if deemed appropriate, concur with the implementation of the consortium-wide protocol and associated studies. The DSMB will meet approximately every six months, with interim meetings as necessary. The DSMB will be compensated by the DACC. The DACC will be responsible for the timely provision of Reports to the DSMB and scheduling the meetings.
Human Subjects Protection
Regulatory Affairs and Compliance
Assuring compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) within the VINYL Consortium in accordance with 45 CFR Parts 160, 162, and 164; Implementation and supervision of the revised Common Rule (45 Part 46) within the VINYL Consortium, including the use of a single-IRB review for federally funded, multi-institutional studies conducted in the United States are required. Clinical Centers must agree to use of the single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) selected by the Coordinating Center for all VINYL Consortium studies, consistent with NIH policies regarding multi-site studies involving human subjects.
Responsiveness to this NOFO
NHLBI will accept applications that include Basic Experimental Studies in Humans (BESH) - mechanistic human studies, with prospective interventions to elucidate pathobiology. In accordance with NOT-HL-19-690, for applications that propose Clinical Trials, NHLBI will accept applications that propose the following:
The following types of applications will be considered non-responsive to this NOFO and will be returned without review:
Investigators proposing NIH-defined clinical trials may refer to the Research Methods Resources website for information about developing statistical methods and study designs.
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Cooperative Agreement: A financial assistance mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this NOFO.
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply - Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Optional: Accepting applications that either propose or do not propose clinical trial(s) that are in accordance with guidelines established in NOT-HL-19-690.
NHLBI intends to commit $800,000 in FY26 to fund one award.
The number of awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
Application budgets are limited to direct costs of up to $500,000 in year 1; up to $600,000 in Year 2; up to $700,000 in years 3 through 7, and should reflect the actual needs of the project.
The maximum project period is up to seven years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Higher Education Institutions - Includes all types
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
For-Profit Organizations
Local Governments
Federal Governments
Other
NIH will no longer issue awards (new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. This new requirement was effective, May 1, 2025.
Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply - Application Guide.
NHLBI encourages multi-PD/PI applications with at least two PDs/PIs; one with biostatistical expertise and demonstrated experience in coordinating large multi-site clinical research studies, and another senior investigator with extensive clinical research experience and expertise in the areas of pediatric observational and longitudinal studies. Familiarity with and support for data and biospecimen collection for sharing purposes is desirable.
This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
Number of Applications
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
CCC and DACC applications will be submitted as companion applications with the same submission and review dates.
The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the How to Apply - Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
All page limitations described in the How to Apply – Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply – Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
The PD/PI (or Multi-PDs/PIs) of the DACC must be experienced in the coordination and management of a multi-center research project, including success in meeting milestones and timelines. The experience of each PD/PI and all Key Personnel must be carefully documented and roles and responsibilities must be well-defined. DACCs require a multidisciplinary team and the application should reflect the team's hands-on involvement in DACC functions, including coordination, tracking, logistics and administration, communications, data management (including quality control), data security and IT infrastructure (including development of public and secure study websites), regulatory support, and biostatistical/analytical support. The DACC application must include personnel and corresponding biographical sketches for the DACC only. All Key Personnel who are major scientific contributors to the study must provide an NIH Biosketch whether or not they are budgeted. The PD/PI (or Multi-PDs/PIs) for the DACC cannot be Key Personnel on the CCC application.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
The application must include only its own budget, including any subcontract budgets associated with it. Separate itemized budgets must be prepared for each subcontract. The application must provide detailed annual budgets that will enable the DACC to meet its milestones.
All costs requested and all changes in budgets after the first year should be clearly identified and justified. The DACC budget must be synchronized with the CCC budget.
The DACC should include in their budget all costs associated with DSMB activities. This includes the costs for preparing reports for the DSMB and meeting reimbursement for the DSMB members. The DACC should assess the need for liability insurance for DSMB members and provide a plan commensurate with the risk of the study. The budget should include provision for executing the plan proposed. The DACC should also include a plan for assessing DSMB member conflict of interest, and put associated costs in the budget. Additionally, if the DSMB is convened by NHLBI, the DACC should include in their budget coordination of support for at least one DSMB meeting per year in Bethesda, MD and coordinate regular DSMB calls as needed (by teleconference or videoconference).
Include budget support for steering committee meetings whether in person or as a hybrid video conference. Include budget support for publication, dissemination of results, and data sharing.
In addition, budget support for an independent study chairperson should be included.
The DACC budget should request only the costs that will be required for the activities to be performed in a given year.
It is recommended that at least a cumulative a minimum of 4.8 person-months among the PD(s)/PI(s) be included. Person months for other Investigators/Staff, the person-months should be commensurate with the effort required for the proposed personnel activities. This should include biostatistical support staff with demonstrated experience in the oversight of large clinical research studies to manage the Coordinating Center's day-to-day activities involving data management and statistical analysis; a comprehensive knowledge of GCP study conduct; development of study enrollment accrual benchmarks.
It is suggested that the Budget adequately address the following:
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Research Strategy
The research strategy must describe the following:
Plans for leading and coordinating a complex multi-center observational study of patients 0-2 years of age, hospitalized with viral bronchiolitis, pneumonia or pediatric ARDS (PARDS) and in-person follow-up at 6 months post-hospitalization. Include plans for maintenance of cohort employing in-person and remote methods until age 4-5 years.
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
All applications, regardless of the amount of direct costs requested for any one year, should address a Resources Sharing Plan.
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply - Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered Yes to the question Are Human Subjects Involved? on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Delayed Onset Study
Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIHs electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organizations profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by NHLBI, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at [email protected].
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
A proposed Clinical Trial application may include study design, methods, and intervention that are not by themselves innovative but address important questions or unmet needs. Additionally, the results of the clinical trial may indicate that further clinical development of the intervention is unwarranted or lead to new avenues of scientific investigation.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Does the proposed [Center] address the needs of the research [programs/projects/network/consortium/resource] that it will [coordinate/administer/serve]? Is the scope of activities proposed for the [Center] appropriate to meet those needs? Will successful completion of the aims bring unique advantages or capabilities to the research [program/projects/network/consortium/resource]?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
Are the scientific rationale and need for a clinical trial to test the proposed hypothesis or intervention well supported by preliminary data, clinical and/or preclinical studies, or information in the literature or knowledge of biological mechanisms? For trials focusing on clinical or public health endpoints, is this clinical trial necessary for testing the safety, efficacy or effectiveness of an intervention that could lead to a change in clinical practice, community behaviors or health care policy? For trials focusing on mechanistic, behavioral, physiological, biochemical, or other biomedical endpoints, is this trial needed to advance scientific understanding?
Specific to this NOFO:
Evaluate the potential for the VINYL consortium to contribute to continued discovery science in these conditions after the award ends.
Are the PD(s)/PI(s) and other personnel well suited to their roles in the [Center]? Do they have appropriate experience and training, and have they demonstrated experience and an ongoing record of accomplishments in managing [adjective] research? Do the investigators demonstrate significant experience with coordinating collaborative [basic or clinical] research? If the Center is multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise and skills; are their [leadership approach, governance, plans for conflict resolution, and organizational structure] appropriate for the [Center]? Does the applicant have experience overseeing selection and management of subawards, if needed?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
With regard to the proposed leadership for the project, do the PD/PI(s) and key personnel have the expertise, experience, and ability to organize, manage and implement the proposed clinical trial and meet milestones and timelines? Do they have appropriate expertise in study coordination, data management and statistics? For a multicenter trial, is the organizational structure appropriate and does the application identify a core of potential center investigators and staffing for a coordinating center?
Does the application propose novel [organizational concepts, management strategies, or instrumentation] in coordinating the research [program/projects/network/consortium/resource] the [Center] will serve? Are the concepts, strategies, or instrumentation novel to one type of research program or applicable in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of [organizational concepts, management strategies or instrumentation] proposed?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
Does the design/research plan include innovative elements, as appropriate, that enhance its sensitivity, potential for information or potential to advance scientific knowledge or clinical practice?
Are the overall strategy, operational plan, and organizational structure well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the goals of the research [program/projects/network/consortium/ resource] the [Center] will serve? Will the investigators promote strategies to ensure a robust and unbiased scientific approach across the [program/projects/network/consortium/resource], as appropriate for the work proposed? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the [program/projects/network/consortium/ resource] is in the early stages of operation, does the proposed strategy adequately establish feasibility and manage the risks associated with the activities of the [program/projects/network/consortium/resource]? Are an appropriate plan for work-flow and a well-established timeline proposed? Have the investigators presented adequate plans to ensure consideration of relevant biological variables, such as sex, for studies of vertebrate animals or human subjects?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
Does the application adequately address the following, if applicable
Study Design
Is the study design justified and appropriate to address primary and secondary outcome variable(s)/endpoints that will be clear, informative and relevant to the hypothesis being tested? Is the scientific rationale/premise of the study based on previously well-designed preclinical and/or clinical research? Given the methods used to assign participants and deliver interventions, is the study design adequately powered to answer the research question(s), test the proposed hypothesis/hypotheses, and provide interpretable results? Is the trial appropriately designed to conduct the research efficiently? Are the study populations (size, sex, age, demographic group), proposed intervention arms/dose, and duration of the trial, appropriate and well justified?
Are potential ethical issues adequately addressed? Is the process for obtaining informed consent or assent appropriate? Is the eligible population available? Are the plans for recruitment outreach, enrollment, retention, handling dropouts, missed visits, and losses to follow-up appropriate to ensure robust data collection? Are the planned recruitment timelines feasible and is the plan to monitor accrual adequate? Has the need for randomization (or not), masking (if appropriate), controls, and inclusion/exclusion criteria been addressed? Are differences addressed, if applicable, in the intervention effect due to sex and race/ethnicity?
Are the plans to standardize, assure quality of, and monitor adherence to, the trial protocol and data collection or distribution guidelines appropriate? Is there a plan to obtain required study agent(s)? Does the application propose to use existing available resources, as applicable?
Data Management and Statistical Analysis
Are planned analyses and statistical approach appropriate for the proposed study design and methods used to assign participants and deliver interventions? Are the procedures for data management and quality control of data adequate at clinical site(s) or at center laboratories, as applicable? Have the methods for standardization of procedures for data management to assess the effect of the intervention and quality control been addressed? Is there a plan to complete data analysis within the proposed period of the award?
Specific to this NOFO:
Evaluate the adequacy of proposed plans for establishing dedicated data derived from the performance of the study across many sites.
Will the institutional environment in which the [Center] will operate contribute to the probability of success in facilitating the research [program/projects/network/consortium] it serves? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the [Center] proposed? Will the [Center] benefit from unique features of the institutional environment, infrastructure, or personnel? Are resources available within the scientific environment to support electronic information handling?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
If proposed, are the administrative, data coordinating, enrollment and laboratory/testing centers, appropriate for the trial proposed?
Does the application adequately address the capability and ability to conduct the trial at the proposed site(s) or centers? Are the plans to add or drop enrollment centers, as needed, appropriate?
If international site(s) is/are proposed, does the application adequately address the complexity of executing the clinical trial?
If multi-sites/centers, is there evidence of the ability of the individual site or center to: (1) enroll the proposed numbers; (2) adhere to the protocol; (3) collect and transmit data in an accurate and timely fashion; and, (4) operate within the proposed organizational structure?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Specific to applications involving clinical trials
Is the study timeline described in detail, taking into account start-up activities, the anticipated rate of enrollment, and planned follow-up assessment? Is the projected timeline feasible and well justified? Does the project incorporate efficiencies and utilize existing resources (e.g., CTSAs, practice-based research networks, electronic medical records, administrative database, or patient registries) to increase the efficiency of participant enrollment and data collection, as appropriate?
Are potential challenges and corresponding solutions discussed (e.g., strategies that can be implemented in the event of enrollment shortfalls)?
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following three points: (1) a complete description of all proposed procedures including the species, strains, ages, sex, and total numbers of animals to be used; (2) justifications that the species is appropriate for the proposed research and why the research goals cannot be accomplished using an alternative non-animal model; and (3) interventions including analgesia, anesthesia, sedation, palliative care, and humane endpoints that will be used to limit any unavoidable discomfort, distress, pain and injury in the conduct of scientifically valuable research. Methods of euthanasia and justification for selected methods, if NOT consistent with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, is also required but is found in a separate section of the application. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals Section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Not applicable.
For [programs/projects/networks/consortia/resources] involving key biological and/or chemical resources, reviewers will comment on the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Reviewers will comment on whether the Resource Sharing Plan(s) (e.g., Sharing Model Organisms) or the rationale for not sharing the resources, is reasonable.
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by the Center for Scientific Review, in accordance with NIH peer review policies and practices, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
Applications may undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Appeals of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this NOFO.
Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.
Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicants federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicants integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants. This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipients business official.
In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.
Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk. For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.
Individual awards are based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, the NIH and are subject to the IC-specific terms and conditions identified in the NoA.
ClinicalTrials.gov: If an award provides for one or more clinical trials. By law (Title VIII, Section 801 of Public Law 110-85), the "responsible party" must register and submit results information for certain applicable clinical trials on the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System Information Website (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov). NIH expects registration and results reporting of all trials whether required under the law or not. For more information, see https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/reporting/index.htm
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that all protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
Data and Safety Monitoring Requirements: The NIH policy for data and safety monitoring requires oversight and monitoring of all NIH-conducted or -supported human biomedical and behavioral intervention studies (clinical trials) to ensure the safety of participants and the validity and integrity of the data. Further information concerning these requirements is found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/hs/data_safety.htm and in the application instructions (SF424 (R&R) and PHS 398).
Investigational New Drug or Investigational Device Exemption Requirements: Consistent with federal regulations, clinical research projects involving the use of investigational therapeutics, vaccines, or other medical interventions (including licensed products and devices for a purpose other than that for which they were licensed) in humans under a research protocol must be performed under a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational new drug (IND) or investigational device exemption (IDE).
The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:
All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.
Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable federal regulations. NIH may terminate awards under certain circumstances. See 2 CFR Part 200.340 Termination and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.5.2 Remedies for Noncompliance or Enforcement Actions: Suspension, Termination, and Withholding of Support.
Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, Div. N, § 405, Pub. Law 114-113, 6 USC § 1533(d), the HHS Secretary has established a common set of voluntary, consensus-based, and industry-led guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes.
Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that:
When recipients, subrecipients, or third-party entities have:
Recipients shall develop plans and procedures, modeled after the NIST Cybersecurity framework, to protect HHS systems and data. Please refer to NIH Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting for additional information.
The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) administrative guidelines, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grant administration regulations at 2 CFR Part 200, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the recipients is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the recipients for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the recipients and NIH as defined below.
The PD(s)/PI(s) will have the primary responsibility for:
NIH staff have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below:
NHLBI will be responsible for overall support, direction and oversight of the VINYL Consortium. The NHLBI Program Office and Office of Grants Management will oversee the overall direction and progress of the VINYL Consortium. The VINYL Consortium DACC will be supported by project scientists from the NHLBI and other Institutes and Centers (ICs) at NIH as needed, a NHLBI statistician as well as an NHLBI-appointed independent Observational and Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB).
The NHLBI Project Scientist will serve on the Steering Committee and other study committees, when appropriate, as the voting member representing NIH. All NIH staff members share one vote in support of the project. The NHLBI Project Scientist may work with recipients on issues coming before the Steering Committee such as recruitment, protocol development, follow-up, quality control, adherence to protocol, possible changes to the protocol, interim data and safety monitoring, final data analysis and interpretation, preparation of publications, and of solutions to major problems, such as insufficient participant enrollment. An independent Chair of the Steering Committee will be appointed by the NHLBI without any other roles or responsibilities within the study.
The NHLBI Project Scientist will serve a dual role as the NHLBI Program Official, will be responsible for the normal program stewardship of the cooperative agreement, and will be named in the Notice of Award. Final decision-making authority on matters of budgetary and funding actions, grants management actions, and management of intellectual property issues is assigned to NHLBI staff other than the Project Scientist/Program Official. The responsibility for final decision-making may reside with Senior Institute management, separate organizational components and/or oversight committees. Because it is anticipated that the Program Official will participate in activities that rise to a level of involvement (i.e., additional role as Project Scientist) that results in conflicts of interest, for example, co-publication, other staff members such as direct line supervisors and/or other Senior NHLBI Program management staff will serve as agency Program Officials and will be responsible for the normal scientific and programmatic stewardship of the award. The NHLBI policy on authorship and manuscript review of NHLBI sponsored extramural research protects against conflicts of interest with the Program Official.
An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be established to oversee participant safety in the clinical trial and provide overall monitoring of interim data and safety issues. As part of the collaborative activities under this cooperative agreement, the NHLBI will collaborate with the recipients to appoint and/or agree upon a single DSMB for monitoring the clinical trial. The DSMB may be appointed by the NHLBI, or with the approval of NHLBI, the DSMB could be an institutional DSMB. At the first meeting in the UG3 phase, the DSMB will review the recipients protocol and potentially recommend modifications. Subsequently, the DSMB will monitor and review recruitment, adverse events, data quality, outcome data, and overall recipient performance. The DSMB has the responsibility to review interim data and final data, and recommend whether the protocol should be modified, and, at each meeting, whether the study should be continued or should be terminated early. An NHLBI scientist other than the NHLBI Project Scientist/Program Official will serve as Executive Secretary to the Board. Because the DSMB serves as an independent group advisory to the NHLBI, study investigators shall not communicate with DSMB members regarding study issues, except as authorized by the Boards Executive Secretary.
NHLBI will also appoint an Advisory Board comprised of independent experts in the field to advise the VINYL Advisory Board for scientific direction and advice. It will consist of a chairperson, clinicians, and scientists who are recognized as experts in viral infections in the young lung, immunology, infectious diseases, cell biology, molecular biology, observational study design, outcome measures, biostatistics, ethics, biospecimen collection, and other areas of expertise as needed. This Board may be consulted for independent advice on any aspect of the underlying science, the relevance and significance of research questions, clinical monitoring, human subject protection, policies and procedures, analysis of outcomes, and data analytics while building the VINYL consortium.
The NHLBI reserves the right to phase-out or curtail the study (or an individual award) in the event of: (a) failure to develop or implement a mutually agreeable protocol, (b) substantial shortfall in subject recruitment milestones, core milestones mutually agreed upon by the recipient organization and PD/PI and the NHLBI, consortium participation and collaboration with other recipients, (c) substantive changes in the agreed-upon methodologies and tools with which NIH cannot concur, (d) human subject ethical issues that may dictate a premature termination, or results that substantially diminish the scientific value of study continuation.
Areas of Joint Responsibility include:
Dispute Resolution:
Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between recipients and NIH may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual recipient. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the recipient's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulation 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulation 45 CFR Part 16.
Consistent with the 2023 NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing, when data management and sharing is applicable to the award, recipients will be required to adhere to the Data Management and Sharing requirements as outlined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Upon the approval of a Data Management and Sharing Plan, it is required for recipients to implement the plan as described.
The creation of the Publicly Accessible VINYL database is the responsibility of the DACC.
When multiple years are involved, recipients will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.4.1 Reporting. To learn more about post-award monitoring and reporting, see the NIH Grants & Funding website, see Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting.
A final RPPR, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.6 Closeout. NIH NOFOs outline intended research goals and objectives. Post award, NIH will review and measure performance based on the details and outcomes that are shared within the RPPR, as described at 2 CFR Part 200.301.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk (Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues)
Finding Help Online: https://www.era.nih.gov/need-help (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
General Grants Information (Questions regarding application instructions, application processes, and NIH grant resources)
Email: [email protected] (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-480-7075
Grants.gov Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and Workspace)
Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726
Email: [email protected]
Marrah Lachowicz-Scroggins, Ph.D.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Telephone: 301-827-8229
Email: [email protected]
Center for Scientific Review (CSR)
Email: [email protected]
Office of Grants Management
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Email: [email protected]
Subject: RFA-HL-26-008
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.