RELEASE DATE:  October 3, 2003

PA NUMBER:  PAR-04-004 (See Replacement PAR-07-430)

(See Notice NOT-MH-06-119 
Extension of and Amendments to PAR-04-004, Interdisciplinary Behavioral Science Centers for Mental Health )

(See Notice NOT-MH-06-120)

EXPIRATION DATE:  February 22, 2007, unless reissued.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)


National Institutes of Health (NIH)


National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

LETTER OF INTENT RECEIPT DATE:  January 18, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007
APPLICATION RECEIPT DATE:  February 18, 2004; February 18, 2005; 
                           February 17, 2006; February 21, 2007



o  Purpose of the PA
o  Research Objectives
o  Mechanism of Support
o  Eligible Institutions
o  Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators
o  Special Requirements
o  Where to Send Inquiries
o  Letter of Intent
o  Submitting an Application
o  Peer Review Process
o  Review Criteria
o  Receipt and Review Schedule
o  Award Criteria
o  Required Federal Citations


This PA replaces PAR-00-130.

The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) invites applications for 
Interdisciplinary Behavioral Science Centers for Mental Health (IBSC).  The 
purpose of these Centers is to support collaborative, hypothesis-driven basic 
research activities that will extend the most cutting-edge theories and 
approaches in basic behavioral science to incorporate current approaches in 
neuroscience.  Center activities will be driven by a basic research question 
(or set of questions) that is framed at the behavioral level (e.g., cognition, 
emotion, personality, social interaction) and that is forging connection with 
neural-level processes.  Ultimately, knowledge yielded by such connections will 
increase the explanatory power of behavioral science, and will enrich 
neuroscience by providing an ever-more-detailed understanding of behavioral and 
mental processes.  The integration of knowledge that results will be in the 
service of the fullest understanding of the complex and reciprocal biobehavioral 
processes responsible for mental health and mental illness.

In addition to support for Full-scale Center activities, support also will be 
available for Start-up Centers.  The goal of Start-up Centers is to support a 
preparatory period of multidisciplinary research prior to the launching of 
integrative activities on a larger scale.  Usually, this will be for those 
behavioral questions, topics, or domains for which there currently are few known 
links to neural processes.



A broad range of substantive domains within basic behavioral science have 
demonstrated their critical role in elucidating fundamental mechanisms involved 
in mental health and mental illness.  Examples are:  cognitive research in 
attention and executive function that is fundamental to understanding deficits 
in both adult and childhood mental disorders; basic research in emotion that is 
identifying the nature and functions of both negative and positive emotion and 
mood; research in individual differences (including temperament) that help 
define both risk and protective processes; and research on interpersonal and 
social interaction that is demonstrating the impact of social experiences on 
both mental and physical health.  Productive linkages of these behavioral 
science approaches to parallel neuroscience approaches have begun, particularly 
in the domains of cognition and emotion.  Still, much more needs to be done in 
all domains to elucidate the specific paths by which behavioral processes and 
social experiences influence and are influenced by brain function.  It is 
particularly important, as well, to examine the developmental course of these 
multi-directional influences across the lifespan.  Ultimately, the full 
understanding of mental health and disorder will critically depend on filling 
these gaps in our basic knowledge of the reciprocal mechanisms linking 
experience, behavior, and the brain.

Interdisciplinary Behavioral Science Centers (IBSCs) will support interactive 
collaborative research environments organized to address a cohesive, interrelated 
set of hypothesis-driven research questions that are stimulated by knowledge and 
theory in basic behavioral science and that incorporate cutting-edge methods and 
techniques of both behavioral science and neuroscience.  In addition, Centers will 
be defined by diversity and cross-disciplinarity in terms of subjects (e.g., human, 
non-human), designs (e.g., experimental, longitudinal), settings (e.g., laboratory, 
field), and/or substantive domains (e.g., cognition, emotion).  Centers also will 
offer interdisciplinary research experiences for students and junior faculty.

Both Full-scale and Start-up Centers share the components and goals stated above and 
the characteristics listed below.  In Start-up Centers, however, collaborations are 
expected to be less differentiated and extensive, involving a more limited range of 
disciplinary specialties.

Research Areas

Core areas of basic behavioral science that are relevant to the IBSC Program  
include:  cognition (e.g., learning, memory, attention, language, perception, 
decision-making); emotion (e.g., experiential, expressive and/or physiological 
aspects of emotional states, emotional traits, and mood); personality processes and 
individual differences; motivation; social cognition (e.g., information—processing, 
attributions, expectancies); social influences and processes; self-regulation; 
attitudes and persuasion; interpersonal interaction; and fundamental biobehavioral 
processes such as sleep, reproduction, and ingestion.  Although the focus of the 
IBSC Program is on basic (normative) processes, the substantive relevance of the 
chosen topics to the understanding of mental health and mental illness must be 
documented and described in the application.

In keeping with the integrative, multidisciplinary emphasis of the IBSC, it is 
encouraged that attention be given to connections across the above domains and 
processes, e.g., links between emotion and learning or memory, or between social 
experience and cognitive functioning.  Developmental approaches to understanding 
these domains and processes also are a priority.  In addition to human studies, 
animal models are appropriate.  Also appropriate are mathematical/computational 
modeling approaches.  In keeping with current NIH priorities related to Health 
Disparities, the broadest possible representation of subjects (e.g., in terms of 
ethnicity, sex, or age) is strongly encouraged.  Where possible, power should be 
sufficient for testing differences within and among groups that are likely to yield 
information of ultimate public health importance.

Neuroscience approaches relevant to the IBSC Program include examinations of neural 
systems, structures, circuits, or processes (e.g., development, plasticity) that are 
poised to inform central questions in behavioral science.  Techniques may include 
neuroimaging (e.g., fMRI, PET, SPECT, noninvasive optical imaging), 
psychophysiological methods (e.g., EEG, ERP, MEG), neuroendocrine methods, and 
neurochemical or lesion techniques.

The overriding focus of the IBSC Program is on basic principles and mechanisms in 
behavioral science and their links to neuroscience.  In contrast, research that is 
primarily focused on understanding clinical disorder or applied issues such as 
risk/protection, treatment, prevention, or service delivery, is not appropriate for 
the IBSC Program.  There may be specific projects or other components within an IBSC 
that involve mental disorder or other clinical or applied issues, but the overall 
emphasis and goal of the IBSC must be to advance basic science.  Investigators 
seeking avenues for the application or translation of basic behavioral science to 
the understanding of mental disorders or improvements in treatment and service 
delivery should consider the Translational Research Centers in Behavioral Science 

Basic neuroscience research that does not have an overriding emphasis on behavioral 
processes and research questions is not appropriate for an IBSC.  Information on 
NIMH center mechanisms for neuroscience research is available at:

Genetics research that incorporates behavioral measures simply in order to reveal 
the action of specific genes is not appropriate for an IBSC.  However, applications 
with genetic components may be considered for an IBSC if the primary goal is the 
understanding of experiential as well as heritable contributions to behavioral or 
mental function.

Center Characteristics

o  IBSCs must address an interrelated set of hypothesis-driven research questions in 
basic behavioral science that are fundamental to the understanding of mental health 
and mental illness.

o  IBSCs must be conceptualized and organized according to a multidisciplinary 
framework that extends cutting-edge theories and approaches in basic behavioral 
science to incorporate current approaches in neuroscience.  Expertise and 
technological support must be available to address the behavioral-neural linkages.

o  IBSCs must demonstrate synergy in their conceptualization and approach.  The 
whole must be more than the sum of the parts.

o  IBSCs must address novel, innovative, and creative research questions and cross-
disciplinary linkages.

o  The IBSC Director must be a senior scientist with substantial research and 
scholarly experience in basic behavioral science.  S/he must have a demonstrated 
ability to organize, administer, and direct the Center.  The Director must be the 
scientific leader of the Center and must also be the Principal Investigator on at 
least one of the individual research projects.  The Director of a Full-scale Center 
must have a minimum time commitment of 30 percent to the Center grant (including 
both administrative and research efforts); for a Start-up Center, the minimum 
commitment is 25 percent.

o  Principal Investigators of individual research projects must be established 
scientists in basic behavioral science or neuroscience research.

o  An IBSC must demonstrate a high degree of collaboration and interdependence among 
investigators, and solid evidence of integration across the component research 

o  An IBSC must provide research apprenticeship opportunities for junior 
investigators to become skilled in the strategies, approaches, and techniques of 
cross-disciplinary behavioral science and neuroscience research.  In addition, there 
should be close coordination between the Center and relevant predoctoral and/or 
postdoctoral research training programs of the institution.  Special attention 
should be given to the recruitment and training of minority and/or disabled students 
and scientists.

o  An IBSC is conceptualized and defined by its integrative, multidisciplinary 
nature and need not be limited by geographical or departmental boundaries.  
Collaborations among different institutions are encouraged, if scientifically 
appropriate and feasible.

o  Each IBSC must have an outreach plan that makes the public aware of the 
importance and implications of the IBSC research for mental health and mental 

Activities Supported

To provide a suitable structure for achieving the objectives of this program, IBSCs 
may request funds for the following:

o  Individual Research Projects:  Funds should be requested to support five or more 
individual research projects in Full-scale Centers (three or more in Start-up 
Centers).  Each project should have the characteristics of a traditional research 
grant (R01), as well as demonstrate a significant integrative contribution to the 
other projects in the IBSC and to the Center as a whole.  If the number of projects 
judged to be meritorious is smaller than the specified minimum, this may preclude 
funding of the entire Center.

o  Cores:  Funds may be requested for "core" support.  Each Core must provide 
essential services to three or more approved individual research projects in Full-
scale Centers (two or more in Start-up Centers).  Possible Cores include those 
focused on administrative, subject recruitment, measurement, technological, and/or 
data management/analysis issues.  Core support may involve salaries, research 
resources to be shared across projects, equipment needed to conduct the research, 
and incidental alteration and renovation of facilities consistent with Public Health 
Service policy.

o  Research Apprenticeships:  Funds should be requested to support the supervised 
cross-disciplinary research activities of junior faculty, postdoctoral staff, and/or 
advanced graduate students.  These individuals should have a high potential for a 
research career but require further supervised research experience.  These 
experiences should be designed in a way that takes advantage of the cross-
disciplinary, integrative character of the IBSC.  Salary support, tuition, travel 
and research support may be provided.  At least five research apprenticeships must 
be made available per year in Full-scale Centers (at least three in Start-up 
Centers).  These Research Apprentice positions may not be provided to individuals 
receiving National Research Service Award support.

o  Essential Scientific Expertise:  To provide the most effective combination of 
scientific knowledge and skills, applicants may request funds to support scientists 
to augment or strengthen the skills, expertise, and capabilities of existing Center 
staff.  Although recruitment of such scientists may take place after the award has 
been made, the expertise required, the role in Center activities, and the time to be 
devoted to the Center should be provided in the application.  It should be 
emphasized, however, that such individuals may not serve as a substitute for a 
Project Principal Investigator after the award is made.

o  Advisory Board:  An external advisory board should serve as an important source 
of guidance from experts in the field who do not have a vested interest in the 
Center or in the research to be conducted by the Center.  Funds may be requested to 
support travel of board members for meetings in the beginning of the second and 
fourth years of funding.  To avoid reducing the pool of potential reviewers, 
applicants should NOT identify prospective board members in the application or 
contact them before a funding decision is made.


This PA will use the NIH Specialized Centers (P50) award mechanism.  As an 
applicant you will be solely responsible for planning, directing, and executing the 
proposed project.  A P50 grant supporting an IBSC is not transferable to another 

This PA uses just-in-time concepts.  It does not, however, use the modular budget 
format; detailed budgets must be provided (see SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION below).

This program does not require cost sharing as defined in the current NIH Grants 
Policy Statement at

There are two levels of Center support:

(1) Full-scale Centers are limited to $1.5 million direct costs in any one year.  
This limit applies to new grants, non-competing continuations, and any subsequent 
competing continuations.  Support is provided for five or more individual research 
projects as well as for core support.  Support may be requested for a project 
period of up to five years.  Each Full-scale Center will be limited to a maximum of 
ten years of support in total.

(2) Start-up Centers are limited to $600,000 direct costs in any one year, 
including non-competing continuation years.  Support is provided for three or more 
individual research projects as well as for core support.  Support may be requested 
for a project period of up to five years.  Start-up Centers may be renewed only as 
Full-scale Centers, which then would be permitted a maximum of ten years of support 
in total.  Criteria for appropriateness of Start-up Center support are noted in the 

Competitive supplements will not be considered for these Center grants.  It is 
anticipated that individual projects that are outgrowths of Center activity will 
seek independent funding through mechanisms such as research project grants (R01s).

Since IBSCs are defined by their multidisciplinary, integrative nature and not by 
departmental or geographic boundaries, projects constituting a given Center may be 
based at a variety of institutions.  In an effort to allow for such multi-
institutional involvement, for the purposes of this PA, Facilities and 
Administrative (F&A) Costs for such consortium and contractual arrangements will 
not be counted against the direct costs limits noted above.  However, these costs 
should be delineated as instructed in Form PHS 398 (rev. 5/01).


You may submit an application if your institution has any of the following 

o  For-profit or non-profit organizations
o  Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, and 
o  Units of State and local governments
o  Eligible agencies of the Federal government
o  Domestic institutions

Foreign institutions are not eligible for an IBSC award, although foreign 
components are possible, e.g., via consortium arrangements.


Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to direct an 
IBSC (see criteria in Center Characteristics above) is invited to work with his/her 
institution to develop an application for support.  Individuals from 
underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities 
are always encouraged to apply for NIH programs.


In conformity with the NIH policy 
applications for IBSC support must include a plan for 
sharing research data.  The plan should be described in the Operational Plan for 
the IBSC (see SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION below), and the adequacy of the plan will 
be considered by NIMH staff in determining whether a grant should be awarded.  The 
study section will comment on the proposed plan for sharing and the adequacy of the 
plan is among the review criteria.  The sharing plan, as approved, after 
negotiation with the applicant when necessary, will be a condition of the award.


We encourage your inquiries concerning this PA and welcome the opportunity to 
answer questions from potential applicants.  Inquiries may fall into three areas:  
scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management issues:

o  Direct your questions about scientific/research issues to:

Mary Ellen Oliveri, Ph.D.
Division of Neuroscience and Basic Behavioral Science
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 7220, MSC 9651
Bethesda, MD  20892-9651
Rockville, MD  20852 (for express/courier service)
Telephone:  (301) 443-3942
FAX:  301-443-9876

o  Direct your questions about peer review issues to:

Michael Kozak, Ph.D.
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6138, MSC 9608
Bethesda, MD  20892-9608
Rockville, MD  20852 (for express/courier service
Telephone:  (301) 443-1340
FAX:  (301) 594-0702

o  Direct your questions about financial or grants management matters to:

Ms. Carol J. Robinson
Grants Management Branch
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6118, MSC 9605
Bethesda, MD  20892-9605
Rockville, MD  20852 (for express/courier service)
Telephone:  (301) 443-3858
FAX:  (301) 443-6885


Interested parties are strongly encouraged to contact Dr. Oliveri (listed under 
INQUIRIES) as early as possible in the conceptualization of a possible IBSC 
application in order to assess the responsiveness of the application to the mission 
of NIMH and to the goals of this PA.  Applications judged not to be responsive or 
not appropriately focused on mental-health-relevant basic behavioral processes and 
research questions (as addressed in PURPOSE and RESEARCH OBJECTIVES) may be 
returned to the applicant without review.

Prospective applicants are requested to submit a letter of intent that includes the 
following information:

o  Descriptive title of the proposed Center  
o  Name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator/Center 
o  Names of other key personnel
o  Participating institutions
o  Number and title of this PA

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter 
into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains 
allows NIMH staff to estimate the potential review workload and to plan the review.

The letter of intent is to be postmarked by the date listed at the beginning of 
this PA.  It should be sent to Dr. Mary Ellen Oliveri, listed under INQUIRIES.


Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant application 
instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). Applications must have a Dun and Bradstreet 
(D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number as the Universal Identifier when 
applying for Federal grants or cooperative agreements. The DUNS number can be 
obtained by calling (866) 705-5711 or through the web site at The DUNS number should be entered on line 11 of 
the face page of the PHS 398 form. The PHS 398 is available at in an interactive format.  
For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone (301) 710-0267, Email:

The title and number of this PA must be typed in Item 2 of the face page of the 
application form and the YES box must be checked. 


Application Format Guidelines - A major requirement for an IBSC is the conduct of 
collaborative, multidisciplinary research on a set of cohesive, interrelated basic 
science research questions that are linked in a fundamental, substantive way to 
mental health and mental illness.  The nature of these substantive links to mental 
health and illness must be stated clearly in the application.  The application also 
must describe the overall goals of the IBSC, the hypotheses to be tested, and the 
methods to be used.  The application should clearly articulate the reasons a Center 
approach is needed for the proposed activities, as well as the unique benefits that 
will accrue from a Center.

Utilizing the PHS Form 398 (rev. 5/01), the application should include the 
following components in the designated order.

Information for the entire Center:

o  Face Page, pertaining to the entire Center.

o  Description, Performance Sites and Key Personnel (Form Page 2), pertaining to 
the entire Center.

o  Table of Contents (Form Page 3) for the entire application

o  Budget (Form Pages 4 and 5).  Categorical figures should be provided to describe 
the budget of the overall Center.  Since detailed budget justification will be 
provided separately for each project and core (as described below), only items for 
which justification is not provided elsewhere should be presented in narrative 

o  Biographical Sketches of Key Personnel.  These should be provided for key 
personnel of the entire Center, and should be arranged alphabetically based on the 
individual's surname.

o  Resources.  These should be restricted to those not described separately for the 
individual projects and cores.

o  General Description of the Overall Center (not to exceed 10 pages; for amended 
applications, provide a one-page introduction describing changes from the 
previously submitted version).  Provide an overview of the entire proposed Center, 
describing the Center goals and how they will be achieved.  Explain the proposed 
contribution of each of the individual projects and cores to achieving the Center's 
objectives, and how these components relate to each other scientifically.

o  Evidence of Feasibility and Preliminary Findings (for new--Type 1--applications 
and amended Type 1 applications only; not to exceed 10 pages; for amended 
applications, provide a one-page introduction describing changes from the 
previously submitted version).  Present evidence that the research team will be 
able to work together to achieve the research goals of the Center, preliminary 
results, evidence of competence in the areas proposed, and any other information 
that speaks to feasibility.

o  Progress Report (for competing continuation--Type 2--applications and amended 
Type 2 applications only; not to exceed 3 pages for each project supported in the 
previous Center grant; for amended applications, provide a one-page introduction to 
the entire Progress Report describing changes from the previously submitted 
version).  Describe the research progress of the previously supported Center and 
the manner in which the results relate to the current application.  Describe the 
manner in which the Center mechanism provided synergy to the previously funded 

o  Operational Plan for the Overall Center (not to exceed 10 pages; for amended 
applications, provide a one-page introduction describing changes from the 
previously submitted version).  Describe the working administrative and logistical 
arrangements, as well as resource support necessary to implement the research.  
When multiple institutional sites are involved, a detailed description of the 
cooperative administrative arrangements should be included (and documented in the 
"Letters of Support" section).  Also include in this section a description of the 
manner in which an external advisory board will relate to the Center.  Prospective 
board members should NOT be chosen or contacted prior to a funding decision and, 
therefore, should not be named in the application.  Finally, describe the plan for 
sharing research data as well as any research tools and biological material 
generated by the Center.

o  Research Career Development and Outreach Plans (not to exceed 2 pages).  
Describe how the Center will provide opportunities for junior investigators, 
including the Research Apprentice positions as well as relationships with training 
programs of participating institutions.  Also, describe plans for disseminating 
information to the public regarding the activities of the Center.

Information for each Project or Core:

o Title page for the project or core.  

o  Description, Performance Sites, and Key Personnel (Form Page 2), referring 
specifically to the project or core.

o  Budget (Form Pages 4 and 5).  Detailed budgetary information for each project or 
core, including narrative justification.

o  Resources, referring specifically to the project or core.

o  Research Plan for Individual Projects (not to exceed 10 pages for any one 
project; for amended applications, provide a one-page introduction describing 
changes from the previously submitted version).  Describe the specific aims, 
background, and significance, the research questions to be addressed, and the 
hypotheses to be tested.  Address the status of current research efforts on the 
topic, the limitations of these, why the particular research question lends itself 
to a multidisciplinary, integrative approach, and how the proposed project will be 
linked to and integrated with other proposed Center projects.  Describe the 
research design and methods in as much detail as possible, and address issues of 
feasibility, potential pitfalls, alternative approaches, and relevance to Center 

o  Descriptions of Individual Cores (Not to exceed 8 pages for any one Core; for 
amended applications, provide an extra one-page introduction describing changes 
from the previously submitted version).  Describe how the core will contribute to 
the overall goals of the Center, including the facilities, resources, services, and 
professional skills that it will provide.  Describe which projects will be 
supported by the Core and the manner in which that support will be rendered.

o  Human Subjects.  For each individual project and core involving human subjects, 
describe the plans for protection of subjects from research risks, as well as plans 
for the inclusion of women, minorities, and children, as described in the PHS 398 
(rev. 5/01) application instructions.

o  Vertebrate Animals.  For each individual project and core involving vertebrate 
animals, provide a detailed description and justification for the use of animals as 
described in the PHS 398 (rev. 5/01) application instructions.

Additional Information for the entire Center:

o  Literature Cited, compiled across all sections of the application.

o  Letters of Support from Collaborating Institutions, compiled across all sections 
of the application.  Also include in this section assurances from Institutional 
Review Boards and/or Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (although the 
former is not required for peer review).

o  Checklist

o  Personal Data on Center Director

SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH:  Submit a signed original of the application and 
three signed photocopies in one package to:

Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD  20892-7710
Bethesda, MD  20817 (for express/courier service)

At the same time, two additional copies of the application must be sent to:

Jean G. Noronha, Ph.D.
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6154, MSC 9609
Bethesda, MD  20892-9609
Rockville, MD  20852 (express or courier service)

APPLICATION PROCESSING:  Applications must be received by the application receipt 
date listed in the heading of this PA.  If an application is received after that 
date, it may be returned to the applicant without review. 

The CSR will not accept any application in response to this PA that is essentially 
the same as one currently pending initial review unless the applicant withdraws the 
pending application.  The CSR will not accept any application that is essentially 
the same as one already reviewed.  This does not preclude the submission of a 
substantial revision of an unfunded version of an application already reviewed, but 
such application must include an Introduction addressing the previous critique.

Although there is no immediate acknowledgement of the receipt of an application, 
applicants are generally notified of the review and funding assignment within 8 


Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the Center for 
Scientific Review (CSR) and for responsiveness to this PAR by NIMH.  Applications 
that are incomplete or unresponsive will be returned without review.

Applications that are complete and responsive will be evaluated for scientific and 
technical merit by an appropriate scientific review group convened by the NIMH in 
accordance with the review criteria stated below.  As part of this initial merit 
review, all applications will:

o  Receive a written critique 
o  Receive a second level review by the National Advisory Mental Health Council

Although primary assessments of scientific merit will be based on the Center as a 
whole, one or more individual projects or cores could receive lower priority in 
some instances, possibly resulting in the funding of a Center smaller than 


Criteria for review of scientific and technical merit will include the following:

o  Intrinsic Merit:  The overall quality, scientific merit, substantive relevance 
to mental health/illness, and innovation of the research to be conducted; the 
likelihood that the Center will lead to fundamental advances, to new discoveries, 
and/or to new technological developments.

o  Appropriateness of the Center Approach:  The need for and suitability of a 
Center approach; whether a Center approach will add significantly to what could be 
accomplished through other modes of research support; demonstration of synergy in 
the Center's conceptualization and approach.  In this respect, the integration and 
interdependence of component projects and cores is of utmost significance and 
should be described explicitly.

o  Research Competence:  The qualifications and scientific credentials of the 
Center Director, the constituent project directors, and other investigators; these 
individuals should be regarded by their peers as leaders in, and at the forefront 
of, their respective fields.

o  Center Director Credentials:  Demonstrated ability of the Center Director to 
organize, direct, and administer the Center and, in addition, be the Principal 
Investigator on at least one of the individual projects.  It is expected that this 
individual will devote a minimum of 30 percent time to the Center grant.  Thus the 
Director must by necessity be the scientific leader of the Center.

o  Institutional Commitment:  The nature and level of resource commitments and 
resources available from the home institution and from other participating 
institutions, and plans for interactions among the participating institutions.

o  Appropriateness of Management Plans and Arrangements:  The feasibility and 
adequacy of the organizational and administrative plans; the appropriateness of the 
budget; and the mechanisms to evaluate the Center's progress.

o  Quality of Plans for Research Apprenticeships:  The effectiveness of approaches 
used to attract and involve junior investigators and students who show potential 
for significant contributions and independent research careers.

o  Quality of linkages between the proposed Center and ongoing training programs in 
the institutional environment.

o  Outreach:  Quality of approaches used to disseminate information regarding the 
Center's activities as they relate to public understanding of science and mental 
health and illness.

o  Appropriateness of the plan to share research data as well as any research tools 
or biological material generated by the Center.

ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA:  In addition to the above criteria, the following will 
be considered in the determination of scientific merit and the priority score:

o  Protection of Human Subjects from Research Risk:  The involvement of human 
subjects and protections from research risk relating to their participation in the 
proposed research will be assessed. (See criteria included in the section on 
Federal Citations, below).

o  Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children in Research:  The adequacy of plans 
to include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic groups (and 
subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research 
will be assessed.  Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be 
evaluated. (See Inclusion Criteria in the sections on Federal Citations, below).

o  Care and Use of Vertebrate Animals in Research:  If vertebrate animals are to be 
used in the project, the five items described under Section f of the PHS 398 
research grant application instructions (rev. 5/2001) will be assessed.


SHARING RESEARCH DATA:  Applicants requesting more than $500,000 in direct 
costs in any year of the proposed research are expected to include a data 
sharing plan in their application. The reasonableness of the data sharing 
plan or the rationale for not sharing research data will be assessed by the 
reviewers. However, reviewers will not factor the proposed data sharing plan 
into the determination of scientific merit or priority score.

BUDGET:  The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested period of 
support in relation to the proposed research.


Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  January 18, 2004, 2005, 2006
Application Receipt Date:       February 18, 2004; February 18, 2005; February 17, 2006
Administrative Review:          February-March
Scientific Review:              June-July
Advisory Council Review:        September
Earliest Start Date:            September


o  Potential to advance the field
o  Scientific merit as determined by peer review
o  Responsiveness to the purposes and objectives outlined in this PA
o  Availability of funds


HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION:  Federal regulations (45CFR46) require that applications 
and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated with reference to the 
risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the 
potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance 
of the knowledge gained or two be gained. 

DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING PLAN:  Data and safety monitoring is required for all 
types of clinical trials, including physiologic, toxicity, and dose-finding studies 
(phase I); efficacy studies (phase II); efficacy, effectiveness and comparative 
trials (phase III).  The establishment of data and safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) 
is required for multi-site clinical trials involving interventions that entail 
potential risk to the participants.  (NIH Policy for Data and Safety Monitoring, 
NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, June 12, 1998:

SHARING RESEARCH DATA:  Starting with the October 1, 2003, receipt date, 
investigators submitting an NIH application seeking $500,000 or more in direct 
costs in any single year are expected to include a plan for data sharing or state 
why this is not possible,  
Investigators should seek guidance from their institutions on issues related to 
institutional policies, local IRB rules, as well as local, state and Federal laws 
and regulations, including the Privacy Rule.  Reviewers will consider the data 
sharing plan but will not factor the plan into the determination of the scientific 
merit or the priority score.

policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-
populations must be included in all NIH-supported research projects with human 
subjects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that 
inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the 
purpose of the research.  This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 
1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43).

All investigators proposing research with human subjects should read the "NIH 
Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research - 
Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts on 
October 9, 2001 
a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at
The amended policy incorporates:  the use of an NIH definition of clinical research; 
updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB standards; 
clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials 
consistent with the new PHS Form 398; and updated roles and responsibilities of NIH 
staff and the extramural community.  The policy continues to require for all NIH-
defined Phase III clinical trials that:  a) all applications or proposals and/or 
protocols must provide a description of plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, 
to address differences by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including 
subgroups if applicable; and b) investigators must report annual accrual and 
progress in conducting analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic 
group differences.

NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must 
be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by the NIH, 
unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them.  This policy 
applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for receipt dates after 
October 1, 1998.

All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH 
Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as participants in research 
involving human subjects that is available at

requires education on the protection of human subject participants for all 
investigators submitting NIH proposals for research involving human subjects.  You 
will find this policy announcement in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts 
Announcement, dated June 5, 2000, at

HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS (hESC): Criteria for federal funding of research on 
hESCs can be found at and at  Only 
research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human Embryonic Stem 
Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal funding (see   It 
is the responsibility of the applicant to provide, in the project description and 
elsewhere in the application as appropriate, the official NIH identifier(s)for the 
hESC line(s)to be used in the proposed research.  Applications that do not provide 
this information will be returned without review.

of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to provide public 
access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under some 
circumstances.  Data that are (1) first produced in a project that is supported in 
whole or in part with Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a 
Federal agency in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., 
a regulation) may be accessed through FOIA.  It is important for applicants to 
understand the basic scope of this amendment.  NIH has provided guidance at

Applicants may wish to place data collected under this PA in a public archive, 
which can provide protections for the data and manage the distribution for an 
indefinite period of time.  If so, the application should include a description of 
the archiving plan in the study design and include information about this in the 
budget justification section of the application.  In addition, applicants should 
think about how to structure informed consent statements and other human subjects 
procedures given the potential for wider use of data collected under this award.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued final modification to the 
"Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information," the 
"Privacy Rule," on August 14, 2002.  The Privacy Rule is a federal regulation under 
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 that 
governs the protection of individually identifiable health information, and is 
administered and enforced by the DHHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR).  Those who 
must comply with the Privacy Rule (classified under the Rule as "covered entities") 
must do so by April 14, 2003 (with the exception of small health plans which have 
an extra year to comply).

Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside with 
the researcher and his/her institution.  The OCR website ( 
provides information on the Privacy Rule, including a complete Regulation Text and 
a set of decision tools on "Am I a covered entity?"  Information on the impact of 
the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH processes involving the review, funding, and progress 
monitoring of grants, cooperative agreements, and research contracts can be found 

URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES:  All applications and proposals for 
NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations.  Unless 
otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, Internet addresses (URLs) should not be 
used to provide information necessary to the review because reviewers are under no 
obligation to view the Internet sites.  Furthermore, we caution reviewers that 
their anonymity may be compromised when they directly access an Internet site.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010:  The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the 
health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS-
led national activity for setting priority areas.  This PA is related to one or 
more of the priority areas.  Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy 
People 2010" at


This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance at and is not subject to the intergovernmental review 
requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review.  Awards are 
made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service 
Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 
CFR Parts 74 and 92.  All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost 
principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.  
The NIH Grants Policy Statement can be found at

The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace 
and discourage the use of all tobacco products.  In addition, Public Law 103-227, 
the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some 
cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, 
day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to 
children.  This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the 
physical and mental health of the American people.

Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices

Office of Extramural Research (OER) - Home Page Office of Extramural
Research (OER)
  National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Home Page National Institutes of Health (NIH)
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Home Page Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) - Government Made Easy

Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files.