National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Fogarty International Center (FIC)
Planning Grant for Global Infectious Disease Research Training Program (D71)
D71 International Research Training Grants
Reissue of PAR-15-160
This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) encourages applications for a planning grant from institutions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to design a Global Infectious Disease (GID) Research Training Program in collaboration with U.S. institutions. The application should propose a collaborative process to design a training program that will strengthen the capacity of the LMIC institution to conduct infectious disease research. Planning grants should describe a detailed vision for a research-training program that focuses on a major endemic or life-threatening emerging infectious disease, neglected tropical disease, infections that frequently occur as a co-infection in HIV infected individuals or infections associated with non-communicable disease conditions of public health importance in LMICs.
November 17, 2016
June 26, 2017
30 days prior to the application due date
July, 27, 2017; July 26, 2018; July 25, 2019, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization. All types of non-AIDS applications allowed for this funding opportunity announcement are due on these dates.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
October 2017, October 2018, October 2019
January 2018, January 2019, January 2020
March 2018, March 2019, March 2020
July 26, 2019
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Training Instructions for the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.
Part 1. Overview Information
Part 2. Full Text of the Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section II. Award Information
Section III. Eligibility Information
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
Section V. Application Review Information
Section VI. Award Administration Information
Section VII. Agency Contacts
Section VIII. Other Information
Infectious diseases continue to impose a tremendous health burden in resource-poor countries throughout the world, claiming millions of lives annually and inflicting severe morbidity that results in significant losses in economic productivity and social progress. Attempts to control infectious diseases endemic to low and middle income countries (LMICs) suffer due to an incomplete understanding of the pathogens, disease manifestations and transmission mechanisms, inadequate preventive measures and interventions, and insufficient health services and disease control efforts. A major barrier to improved treatment and control of infectious diseases is the lack of capacity to conduct locally relevant infectious disease research, often due to the scarcity of scientists and health professionals in LMICs with relevant research expertise. Therefore, the overall intent of this funding opportunity is to support a U.S.-LMIC collaborative planning process that will design a research training program to enhance capacity at LMIC institutions to conduct research directly related to prevention, treatment and control of infectious diseases causing major morbidity and mortality. Applications that include countries with little current research capacity are especially encouraged.
This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) encourages applications for a Planning Grant for Global Infectious Disease Research Training program from LMIC research institutions. The application should propose a planning process with U.S. collaborators and a detailed vision for a research training program to strengthen the capacity of a LMIC institution to conduct infectious disease research that focuses on 1) major endemic or life-threatening emerging infectious diseases 2) neglected tropical diseases 3) infections that frequently occur as co-infections in HIV infected individuals or 4) infections associated with non-communicable disease conditions of public health importance in LMICs. FIC will support the planning of innovative research training programs that are designed to build sustainable infectious disease research capacity at an institution in an endemic LMIC. Sustainable infectious disease research capacity is known to require a critical mass of scientists and health research professionals with in-depth scientific expertise and complementary leadership skills that enable the institution to conduct independent, internationally-recognized infectious disease research relevant to the health priorities of their country.
The proposed planning process is expected to lead to an application submitted in response to PAR-17-057, Global Infectious Disease Research Training Program (D43) which provides up to five years of support for U.S.-LMIC collaborative research training.
This program does not support HIV/AIDS research training. Applicants interested in HIV research training should apply to the Fogarty HIV Research Training Program funding opportunities (see http://www.fic.nih.gov/Programs/Pages/hiv-aids-research-training.aspx).
The objectives of the Planning Grant for the Global Infectious Disease Research Training program are:
- To assess the existing research and research training capacity in the proposed infectious disease scientific area directly relevant to the LMIC health priorities at the applicant institution in order to justify the need for additional research training;
-To develop a detailed vision and strategies for implementing an innovative research training and career development program for multiple scientists and health research professionals to strengthen the applicant LMIC institution's capacity to conduct independent, sustainable infectious disease research;
-To identify the research training, faculty development, scientific environment and administrative resources needed to undertake such a research training program;
-To define a pool of the best potential LMIC trainees that could be recruited and the selection process for future research training;
-To define the collaborations and roles of all individual and institutional partners for an effective organizational structure that will support the envisioned research training program; and
-To organize and submit an application for the D43 FOA PAR-17-057.
As the rationale for a proposed planning grant, applications must identify an infectious disease scientific focus directly relevant to the LMIC health priorities for which research capacity is limited at the LMIC institution. Applications may focus on research training on an infectious disease that is a:
1) Major endemic or life-threatening emerging infectious disease (https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/emerging-infectious-diseases-pathogens)
2) Neglected tropical disease (https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/neglected-tropical-diseases)
3) Infections associated with non-communicable disease conditions of public health importance or
4) Infections that frequently occur as a co-infection in HIV infected individuals. However, applications that focus exclusively on planning HIV/AIDS research training will not be supported in this program.
Applicants are encouraged to plan multidisciplinary research training programs with a focus on a global infectious disease theme. Training PDs/PIs are encouraged to plan training programs that will expose LMIC trainees to a diversity of scientific approaches, systems for study, research approaches, and tools and technologies. Planners may consider team-based research approaches depending upon the goals of the training program envisioned. Research training related to infectious disease prevention, care and treatment in a broad range of areas may be planned:
• basic, epidemiologic, clinical, behavioral, and social science research;
• bioinformatics, biostatistics, disease modelling
• vector biology
• pathophysiology, diagnostics and therapeutics research;
• health economics, implementation, operations, health services, and health systems research;
• competencies to support clinical trials;
Proposed planning collaborators should have research expertise directly relevant to the proposed scientific focus of the research training program.
Types of Training to be Planned
Applicants should consider a planning process that incorporates the following characteristics into the training program:
-A strong foundation in research design, methods, and analytic techniques appropriate for the proposed infectious disease research area;
-The enhancement of the LMIC trainees’ ability to conceptualize and think through research problems with increasing independence;
-Experience conducting infectious disease research using state-of-the-art methods as well as presenting and publishing their research findings;
-The opportunity to interact with members of the scientific community at appropriate scientific meetings and workshops; and
-The enhancement of the LMIC trainees’ understanding of the health-related sciences and the relationship of their research training to health and disease.
The Global Infectious Disease Research Training program envisioned by the planners should be designed to move beyond training numbers of people for the next career level to demonstratively increasing sustainable, independently resourced infectious disease research capacity at the proposed LMIC institution.
The institutional infectious disease research training program to be planned may complement other ongoing research training and career development programs at the applicant institution, but must be clearly distinct from related programs.
The planning process may incorporate advanced degree or non-degree research training supported at a U.S. or foreign institution.
The proposed planning process may consider designing short-term training that provides selected LMIC trainees a thorough exposure to the principles and skills of specific research methods or research related competencies to enable immediate incorporation into current trainee research or career development activities.
Transition of supported LMIC trainees to the next career stage should be an important consideration in designing a proposed research training program. Planners should consider how U.S. and LMIC mentors will provide scientific and career guidance.
Applicants are also encouraged to include the design of training activities to strengthen the skills and knowledge necessary for long-term research career sustainability, such as scientific writing and presentation, grant writing, and expertise in bioinformatics, bioethics, good clinical practice, good laboratory practice, biosafety, research administration and English as a second language training, if needed.
The design of future research training may include interactive distance learning, if appropriate and sustainable for the LMIC participants and institutions involved. Planning grants that propose the development of distance learning components may include pilot training activities to explore the effective use of this approach. All applicants are encouraged to develop research training that includes the use of information technology to facilitate trainee data management, access to online scientific information and collaborative interaction.
Planning Trainee Research
Activities can be proposed to plan research training in basic biomedical or clinical sciences; behavioral or social sciences; prevention research; health services, operations and implementation research. Applicants may propose planning for programs in which LMIC trainees are supported to participate in conducting research or analyses associated with clinical trials supported by other research grants. Applicants are encouraged to design multidisciplinary research training programs. The proposed planning process should consider how to incorporate an appropriate mix of research training opportunities to address the infectious disease-related research training capacity needs identified at the LMIC institution.
Research training can be planned in the U.S. or a foreign country, but training-related research should be carried out in the LMIC as much as feasible.
The planning process should determine how all training-related research projects will be independently reviewed through scientific review procedures established by the program and obtain required approvals for human subjects and animal research.
The training program envisioned by the planners should anticipate that LMIC trainees will disseminate the results of their research at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed publications during and after the training period.
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Grant: A support mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.
The OER Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types.
Clinical Trials Not Allowed for due dates on or after January 25, 2018: Only accepting applications that do not propose independent clinical trials
Note: Appointed Trainees are permitted to obtain research experience in a clinical trial led by a mentor or co-mentor.
The number of awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
Applications budgets are limited to $46,000 (total direct costs).
The maximum project period is 1 year.
Individuals designing, directing, and implementing the program planning activities may request salary and fringe benefits appropriate for the person months devoted to these activities. Salaries requested may not exceed the levels commensurate with the institution's policy for similar positions and may not exceed the congressionally mandated cap.
Limited program-related administrative and clerical salary costs associated distinctly with the program that are not normally provided by the applicant organization as F&A costs may be direct charges to the grant only when they are in accordance with 45 CFR 75.413(c). When specifically identified and justified, these expenses must be itemized in Sections A and B, as appropriate, of the R&R Budget.
Salary for the PD(s)/PI(s), other key personnel, training faculty and administrative staff may be requested at levels commensurate with the salary structure and benefits at the institution where they are employed and within the limits described at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/salcap_summary.htm.
Collaborators at partner institutions may receive appropriate compensation for significant contributions to activities in the program planning process. Consultants may be supported for specific contributions to the research training program planning activities.
Travel: Funds may be requested for round-trip economy airfare on U.S. carriers (to the maximum extent possible) and lodging and per diem for the PD(s)/PI(s), key personnel, and faculty to attend the annual program networking meeting, normally in the U.S. Funds may also be requested for U.S. and LMIC collaborators to conduct program planning activities. Support for key personnel, collaborators or consultants to attend scientific meetings and conferences is not allowed.
These expenses must be justified as specifically required by the proposed program and must not duplicate items generally available at the applicant institution.
Indirect Costs (also known as Facilities & Administrative [F&A] Costs) are reimbursed at 8% of modified total direct costs (exclusive of tuition and fees, consortium costs in excess of $25,000, and expenditures for equipment), rather than on the basis of a negotiated rate agreement.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions)
The sponsoring institution must assure support for the proposed program. Appropriate institutional commitment to the program includes the provision of adequate staff, facilities, and educational resources that can contribute to the planning process and the future planned program.
Only higher education institutions in LMICs are eligible to apply. LMICs are defined by the World Bank classification system according to Gross National Income (GNI) per capita as “low-income,” “lower-middle-income,” and “upper-middle-income” (http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups). See Notice of Change in Country Eligibility for Fogarty International Training Grants and Country Eligibility for definition of "eligible LMIC" used in this FOA.
Applications may be submitted by an eligible foreign institution in a LMIC with a collaborating U.S. institution.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. The NIH Policy on Late Submission of Grant Applications states that failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission.
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons.If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Any individual(s) with
the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research training program planning process as the
Training Program Director/Principal Investigator (Training PD/PI) is invited to work with his/her organization to
develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial
and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always
encouraged to apply for NIH support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide.
The PD/PI should be an established investigator in the infectious disease area for which the application is targeted and capable of providing both administrative and scientific leadership to the development and implementation of the proposed planning activities.
The PD/PI should have research and research training experience in the LMIC that is the focus of the application.
Each PD/PI must be designated as the PD/PI of at least one research award that is directly relevant to the scientific focus of the research training proposed and with at least 18 months of support remaining at the time of submission of the application.
PD(s)/PI(s) from the applicant institution must be a citizen of an eligible LMIC.
Due to the collaborative nature of this program, applicants are encouraged to designate the main U.S. collaborator who meets the parent grant eligibility requirement as a Multiple PD/PI. Previous and ongoing research collaborations should be documented by joint publications, grants or previous research training activities.
The PD/PI will be responsible for overseeing the proposed planning process and for the overall direction, management and administration of the planning activities. The PD/PI will be expected to monitor and assess planning progress and submit all documents and reports as required. The PD/PI has responsibility for the day to day administration of the program.
This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is programmatically distinct.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time. This means that the NIH will not accept:
Program faculty who participate in the program planning process should have strong records as researchers, including recent publications and successful competition for research support in the area of the proposed research training program. Program faculty should also have a record of research training, including successful, former trainees who have established productive careers relevant to the NIH mission. Researchers from diverse backgrounds, including racial and ethnic minorities, persons with disabilities, and women are encouraged to participate as mentors.
All U.S. and LMIC faculty participating in the research training grant planning process should have research and research training experience in the LMIC that is the focus of the application.
Research training programs must be planned only for individuals who are citizens or permanent residents of LMICs (defined by the World Bank classification system- also refer to NOT-TW-12-011"Notice of Change in Country Eligibility for Fogarty International Training Grants", for additional information) are eligible for research training support or other training activities. Individuals who have dual citizenship or permanent residency in the U.S., other high income countries or ineligible countries described above are not eligible for support.
Buttons to access the online ASSIST system or to download application forms are available in Part 1 of this FOA. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in
the Training Instructions for the SF424
(R&R) Application Guide including Supplemental
Grant Application Instructions except where instructed in this funding
opportunity announcement to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in
the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are
out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for
For information on Application Submission and Receipt, visit Frequently Asked Questions – Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.
Letter of Intent
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows FIC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
By the date listed in Part 1. Overview Information, prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
The letter of intent should be sent to:
Barbara Sina Ph.D.
All page limitations described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
Instructions for Application Submission
The following section supplements the instructions found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this FOA.
Follow all instructions provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
Follow all instructions provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application.
Follow all instructions provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application, with the following additional modifications:
Project Summary/Abstract. Provide an abstract of the entire application. Include the objectives, rationale and design of the research training program planning process, as well as key activities. Include the name of the LMIC institution and infectious disease focus of the research training program which will be developed during the planning process. Describe the public health relevance of the proposed infectious disease focus of the research training to the named LMIC.
Project Narrative. Describe the public health relevance of the proposed infectious disease focus of the research training to the LMIC.
The filename provided for each “Other Attachment” will be the name used for the bookmark in the electronic application in eRA Commons.
Follow all instructions provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application.
Include the name of one person at each collaborating institution who will serve as the primary collaborator for research training program planning process at that site.
Follow all instructions provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application.
Follow all instructions provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
Follow all instructions provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide with the following additional modifications:
The PHS 398 Research Training Program Plan Form is comprised of the following sections:
Follow all instructions provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide
Provide the rationale for the proposed research training program to be planned in terms of the specific infectious disease research capacity needs for the LMIC and LMIC institution. Applicants should describe the current level of research and expertise at the LMIC institution in the proposed scientific focus area and justify the need for more research training in this field.
Applicants must provide a specific justification for the need for support for a one-year planning process to develop a research training program application. Applicants should explain why the planning activities proposed would not be possible without support from a planning grant.
Describe the process to develop a detailed vision and strategies for implementing an innovative research training and career development program. Outline the objectives of the research training program planning process and a stepwise set of activities that will be used to meet these objectives.
Describe the leadership, administrative skills, scientific research and training experience of the PD/PI(s) and how these strengths will lead to the success of the planning process.
Describe the planned strategy and administrative structure to be used to oversee and monitor the research training program planning process.
The proposed planning process should define the roles of all individual and institutional partners for an effective organizational structure that will support the envisioned research training program.
Applicants should describe how decisions regarding the proposed components of the research training program being planned will be made in consultation with the proposed U.S. and LMIC faculty.
Faculty. The application must include information about the faculty who will be available to contribute to the training program planning process. Describe the complementary expertise and experiences of the proposed faculty planning participants, including active research and other scholarly activities in which the faculty are engaged, as well as experience mentoring and training LMIC individuals.
Provide a description of how the previous and ongoing collaborative research among the PD/PI(s) and faculty as well as other relevant research at the collaborating institutions will provide a foundation for the research training program envisioned.
Describe for whom the training program to be planned is intended, including the training level(s) of the LMIC trainees and the academic and research background needed to pursue the proposed training envisioned. The proposed planning process should define a pool of the best potential LMIC trainees that may be recruited, trainee selection criteria and mentorship during research training.
Institutions with existing programs must explain how the planning process will determine 1) What distinguishes the research training program being developed from the others; 2) How their programs will synergize with one another, if applicable; and 3) That the pool of faculty, potential LMIC trainees, and resources are robust enough to support additional programs.
Include information about the process for developing courses, mentored research experiences, and any activities designed to develop specific technical skills or other competencies essential for the research training envisioned. Applicants are encouraged to include a timeline for all proposed planning activities.
Applicants should also describe how the proposed program planning process will develop activities to provide LMIC trainees with professional development skills and individualized career guidance. Mentorship training for proposed faculty may be proposed during the planning grant period.
The proposed planning process should identify the research resources, faculty development, scientific environment and administrative efforts needed to undertake the research training program envisioned.
Applicants must plan a process by which all training-related research projects will be independently peer-reviewed through a scientific review procedure or committee established by the applicant institution.
Applicants must plan how faculty mentors and LMIC trainees will be provided with education in the protection of human subjects and ethical review of the proposed trainee research by an institutional (or ethical) review board or committee for anticipated trainee research that involves human subjects.
Applicants should design a process to submit an application to Global Infectious Disease Research Training program (D43) PAR-17-057.
Training Program Evaluation
Describe a plan to develop an evaluation process to determine the quality and effectiveness of the training program. This process should include evaluation of the training and mentorship activities envisioned as well as the overall success in building sustainable, independently resourced infectious disease research capacity at the LMIC institution.
Institutional Environment and Commitment to the Program.
The sponsoring institution must assure support for the proposed research training program planning process including assurance that sufficient time will be allowed for the PDs/PIs and other Program Faculty to contribute to the proposed program.
The application should include letters of support from institutional leaders of the collaborating institutions describing the possible institutional contribution and commitment to the research training program to be planned.
Plan for Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research
The proposed planning process should determine how future training program applications submitted to the GID PAR-17-057 will comply with the instructions for Plan for Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research as described in the NIH Application Guide. Applicants are strongly encouraged to develop courses in the responsible conduct of research adapted to the locally relevant scientific context at the LMIC institution that include LMIC faculty.
Do not use the Appendix to circumvent page limits. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
See Part 1. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to
submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any
application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When
a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal
holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Policy on Late Application Submission.
responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA
Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost
principles, and other considerations described in the NIH
Grants Policy Statement. .
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. .
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit Applying Electronically. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Guidelines for Applicants Experiencing System Issues. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in
the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the
SF424(R&R) Application Package. Failure to register in the Commons
and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent
the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH.
The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management (SAM). Additional information may be found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review, NIH. Applications that are incomplete or non-compliant will not be reviewed.
Applicants are required to follow our Post Submission Application Materials policy.
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. As part of the NIH mission, all applications submitted to the NIH in support of biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood that the proposed training program will prepare individuals for successful, productive scientific research careers and thereby exert a sustained influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of the merit of the training program, and give a separate score for each. When applicable, the reviewers will consider relevant questions in the context of proposed short-term training. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact.
Does the applicant demonstrate the need for research training at the applicant LMIC institution?
Does the applicant demonstrate that the proposed infectious disease scientific area for research training is directly relevant to the LMIC health priorities?
Does the applicant propose a realistic plan for developing an application to the Global Infectious Disease Research Training program (D43) FOA?
Is the proposed planning process likely to develop an innovative research training and career development program?
Is there adequate potential for a supportive training environment at the applicant and proposed partner institutions as demonstrated by available faculty mentors, institutional support, and on-going collaborative research projects in which LMIC trainees may participate?
Does the PD/PI have the scientific background, expertise, LMIC experience and administrative and training experience to provide strong leadership, direction, management, and administration of the planning process for the envisioned research training program?
Is there a history of research collaborations among the PD(s)/PI(s), the faculty and staff at the applicant and participating institutions?
Does the Training PD(s)/PI(s) plan to commit sufficient time to the planning process to ensure its success and submission of an application to the D43 FOA?
For applications designating multiple PDs/PIs:
Is a strong justification provided that the multiple PD/PI leadership approach will benefit the training program planning process?
Is a strong and compelling leadership approach evident, including the designated roles and responsibilities, governance, and organizational structure consistent with and justified by the aims of the training program planning process and the complementary expertise of the PDs/PIs?
Are sufficient numbers of U.S. and LMIC faculty with appropriate scientific expertise, appropriate ongoing research and collaborative experience available to contribute to the success of the proposed research training program planning process?
Are sufficient numbers of U.S. and LMIC faculty with appropriate ongoing research available to contribute to the success of the proposed research training program planning process?
Are sufficient numbers of U.S. and LMIC faculty with collaborative experience with each other available to contribute to the success of the proposed research training program planning process?
Does there seem to be an adequate pool of candidates for the future training program?
Are the proposed recruitment and selection strategies likely to attract good candidates??
How successful has the applicant institution been in previous research training efforts?
Do the U.S. and LMIC faculty have histories of training successful LMIC researchers?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Generally not applicable. Reviewers should bring any concerns to the attention of the Scientific Review Officer.
Generally not applicable. Reviewers should bring any concerns to the attention of the Scientific Review Officer.
Generally not applicable. Reviewers should bring any concerns to the attention of the Scientific Review Officer.
For Resubmissions, the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Plans and past record will be rated as ACCEPTABLE or UNACCEPTABLE, and the summary statement will provide the consensus of the review committee.
Budget and Period of Support
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s), convened by the Center for Scientific Review in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications:
Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this FOA. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the The Fogarty International Center Advisory Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
After the peer review of the application is completed, the
PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique)
via the eRA
Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council
review, and earliest start date
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH
will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as
described in the NIH
Grants Policy Statement.
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization for successful applications. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via email to the grantee’s business official.
Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs.
Any application awarded in response to this FOA will be subject to terms and conditions found on the Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants website. This includes any recent legislation and policy applicable to awards that is highlighted on this website.
All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities. More information is provided at Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants.
Recipients of federal financial assistance (FFA) from HHS must administer their programs in compliance with federal civil rights law. This means that recipients of HHS funds must ensure equal access to their programs without regard to a person’s race, color, national origin, disability, age and, in some circumstances, sex and religion. This includes ensuring your programs are accessible to persons with limited English proficiency. HHS recognizes that research projects are often limited in scope for many reasons that are nondiscriminatory, such as the principal investigator’s scientific interest, funding limitations, recruitment requirements, and other considerations. Thus, criteria in research protocols that target or exclude certain populations are warranted where nondiscriminatory justifications establish that such criteria are appropriate with respect to the health or safety of the subjects, the scientific study design, or the purpose of the research.
In accordance with the statutory provisions contained in Section 872 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417), NIH awards will be subject to the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) requirements. FAPIIS requires Federal award making officials to review and consider information about an applicant in the designated integrity and performance system (currently FAPIIS) prior to making an award. An applicant, at its option, may review information in the designated integrity and performance systems accessible through FAPIIS and comment on any information about itself that a Federal agency previously entered and is currently in FAPIIS. The Federal awarding agency will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgement about the applicant’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants as described in 45 CFR Part 75.205 “Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants.” This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
For additional guidance regarding how the provisions apply to NIH grant programs, please contact the Scientific/Research Contact that is identified in Section VII under Agency Contacts of this FOA. HHS provides general guidance to recipients of FFA on meeting their legal obligation to take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to their programs by persons with limited English proficiency. Please see https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/special-topics/limited-english-proficiency/index.html. The HHS Office for Civil Rights also provides guidance on complying with civil rights laws enforced by HHS. Please see http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/understanding/section1557/index.html; and https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-providers/laws-regulations-guidance/index.html. Recipients of FFA also have specific legal obligations for serving qualified individuals with disabilities. Please see http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/understanding/disability/index.html. Please contact the HHS Office for Civil Rights for more information about obligations and prohibitions under federal civil rights laws at https://www.hhs.gov/ocr/about-us/contact-us/index.html or call 1-800-368-1019 or TDD 1-800-537-7697. Also note it is an HHS Departmental goal to ensure access to quality, culturally competent care, including long-term services and supports, for vulnerable populations. For further guidance on providing culturally and linguistically appropriate services, recipients should review the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care at http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlid=53.
Awards made primarily for educational purposes are exempted from the PHS invention requirements and thus invention reporting is not required, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
When multiple years are involved, awardees will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually. Continuation support will not be provided until the required forms are submitted and accepted.
Failure by the grantee institution to submit required forms in a timely, complete, and accurate manner may result in an expenditure disallowance or a delay in any continuation funding for the award.
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act), includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later. All awardees of applicable NIH grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at www.fsrs.gov on all subawards over $25,000. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement.
A final progress report, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Evaluation results should be included as part of the final Progress Report.
A final Progress Report and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
In accordance with the regulatory requirements provided at 45 CFR 75.113 and Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75, recipients that have currently active Federal grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all Federal awarding agencies with a cumulative total value greater than $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of a Federal award, must report and maintain the currency of information reported in the System for Award Management (SAM) about civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings in connection with the award or performance of a Federal award that reached final disposition within the most recent five-year period. The recipient must also make semiannual disclosures regarding such proceedings. Proceedings information will be made publicly available in the designated integrity and performance system (currently FAPIIS). This is a statutory requirement under section 872 of Public Law 110-417, as amended (41 U.S.C. 2313). As required by section 3010 of Public Law 111-212, all information posted in the designated integrity and performance system on or after April 15, 2011, except past performance reviews required for Federal procurement contracts, will be publicly available. Full reporting requirements and procedures are found in Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75 – Award Term and Conditions for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters.
In carrying out its stewardship of human resource-related programs, the NIH may request information essential to an assessment of the effectiveness of this program from databases and from participants themselves. Participants may be contacted after the completion of this award for periodic updates on various aspects of their employment history, publications, support from research grants or contracts, honors and awards, professional activities, and other information helpful in evaluating the impact of the program.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Commons Help Desk (Questions regarding eRA Commons
registration, submitting and tracking an application, documenting system
problems that threaten submission by the due date, post submission issues)
Finding Help Online: http://grants.nih.gov/support/ (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
Customer Support (Questions
regarding Grants.gov registration and submission, downloading forms and
Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726
GrantsInfo (Questions regarding application instructions and
process, finding NIH grant resources)
Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov (preferred method of contact)
Barbara Sina Ph.D.
Fogarty International Center (FIC)
Alexander Politis Ph.D
Center for Scientific Review (CSR)
Fogarty International Center (FIC)
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Section 487 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 288) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 66.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 287b) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 63a.
Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files.