INNOVATION IN MOLECULAR IMAGING PROBES
RELEASE DATE: July 22, 2004
RFA NUMBER: RFA-RM-04-021
EXPIRATION DATE: October 23, 2004
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATION:
The National Institutes of Health (NIH)
(http://www.nih.gov/)
This RFA is developed as an NIH Roadmap initiative
http://nihroadmap.nih.gov. All NIH Institutes and Centers participate
in Roadmap initiatives. This RFA will be administered by the National
Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering on behalf of the NIH.
CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBERS: 93.286
LETTER OF INTENT RECEIPT DATE: September 22, 2004
APPLICATION RECEIPT DATE: October 22, 2004
THIS RFA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
o Purpose of this RFA
o Research Objectives
o Mechanism of Support
o Funds Available
o Eligible Institutions
o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators
o Special Requirements
o Where to Send Inquiries
o Letter of Intent
o Submitting an Application
o Supplementary Instructions
o Peer Review Process
o Review Criteria
o Receipt and Review Schedule
o Award Criteria
o Required Federal Citations
PURPOSE OF THIS RFA
This Request for Applications (RFA) is part of the Molecular Libraries
and Imaging (MLI) Initiative of the NIH Roadmap. Molecular imaging has
the potential to monitor both normal and abnormal biochemical and
physiological parameters in individual patients. A major road-block to
clinical application of molecular imaging is the poor sensitivity,
specificity and spatial localization of current imaging probes. The
purpose of this RFA is to encourage the development of new probes that
will achieve one or two orders of magnitude (i.e., a factor of 10 to
100) improvement in the ability to detect and image specific molecular
events in vivo, and also have potential for clinical applications.
This RFA solicits pilot and feasibility studies that explore novel and
untested high-risk approaches to achieve this goal, rather than
incremental technology development that is already supported by current
NIH programs. A team approach is encouraged, and chemists, physicists
and engineers who are new to the NIH are strongly encouraged to
participate in this program.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Background
Current methods for imaging humans provide predominantly anatomical
information, or functional information at a macroscopic level.
Molecular imaging is an emerging research area aimed at extending
existing or novel methods to image specific molecular pathways in vivo,
particularly those that are key targets in disease processes. Unlike
anatomical imaging, molecular imaging displays biochemical and
physiological abnormalities underlying disease, rather than the
structural consequences of these abnormalities.
Potential clinical applications of molecular imaging include:
o monitoring cell therapies by tracking the survival, movement,
engraftment and differentiation of injected or implanted cells and
tissues
o monitoring gene therapies by reporting on gene expression and
cellular function
o precise localization of tumors within organs, and detection of
precancerous cells
o detection and tracking of bacteria and viruses throughout their
infectious cycles in cells, tissues and organs; monitoring of cellular
responses to infection
o tracking of circulating cells in the vasculature and tissues
o following the movement of cells in tissue injury and repair,
inflammation, and metastasis
o imaging of cellular functions in organs and tissues by detecting
trafficking and transport, adhesion and migration, differentiation,
neurogenesis, cell cycle progression, stress responses and apoptosis
o detection of microenvironments contributing to pathology and
monitoring of responses to injury, oxidative stress and hypoxia
o imaging of action potentials, membrane polarization, channel
activity, synaptic transmission. Neurochemical imaging
o imaging intracellular molecular processes, intermolecular
interactions, and signal transduction pathways.
Molecular imaging approaches are not used to their full potential in
humans, either in research or clinical environments. One reason is the
poor sensitivity, specificity and spatial localization of molecular
probes that can be used in humans. Another reason is the relatively
poor signal-to-noise and spatial resolution of most human molecular
imaging techniques. A third reason could be toxicity of the molecular
probe. Potential clinical applications of molecular imaging have,
however, been widely recognized at recent workshops and meetings
sponsored by the NIH and other agencies, and the development of
molecular imaging approaches that can be used in clinical environments
is an important goal of the NIH Roadmap process.
Scope of Research
Contrast in molecular imaging is generated or enhanced by molecular
probes reagents that are targeted to specific intracellular or
extracellular molecules and either produce or alter signals that are
detected by imaging devices. Imaging of molecular probes in individual
cells or small groups of cells in vivo will require contrast that is
orders of magnitude better than current capabilities. Responses to
this RFA should propose long-term strategies to achieve one or two
orders of magnitude improvement in the ability to detect and image
specific molecular events in humans. These improvements should result
primarily from increases in the sensitivity and specificity of
molecular probes, but could also include related improvements that
result from increases in the signal-to-noise or spatial resolution of
human molecular imaging devices.
Applications that propose only to improve the signal-to-noise or
spatial resolution of molecular imaging devices will be considered non-
responsive.
Novel molecular imaging probes developed in applications submitted to
this RFA should have a clear path to future clinical applications.
However, clinical research need not be undertaken during the period of
this grant.
This RFA is specifically intended for innovative research of unproven
feasibility, and will support projects that explore chemical and
physical phenomena that may ultimately lead to new molecular imaging
probes. Investigators are encouraged to work closely with biologists
and clinicians in order to address potential issues of toxicity and
delivery that could complicate the clinical utility of new molecular
imaging probes.
Novel molecular probes or imaging techniques that result from this RFA
should eventually have broad applications to medical research and
clinical care.
MECHANISM OF SUPPORT
This RFA will use the R21 mechanism. As an applicant you will be
solely responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed
project. This RFA is a one-time solicitation. Future unsolicited,
competing-continuing applications based on this project will compete
with all investigator-initiated applications and will be reviewed
according to the customary peer review procedures. The earliest
anticipated award date is July 1, 2005. Applications that are not
funded in the competition described in this RFA may be resubmitted as
NEW investigator-initiated applications using the standard receipt
dates for NEW applications described in the instructions to the PHS 398
application.
This RFA uses just-in-time concepts. It also uses the modular
budgeting as well as the non-modular budgeting formats (see
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm).
Specifically, if you are submitting an application with direct costs in
each year of $250,000 or less, use the modular budget format.
Otherwise follow the instructions for non-modular budget research grant
applications. This program does not require cost sharing as defined in
the current NIH Grants Policy Statement at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part2.htm.
FUNDS AVAILABLE
The NIH intends to commit approximately $3.3 million in FY 2005 to fund
about seven new grants in response to this RFA. An applicant may
request a project period of up to four years and a budget for direct
costs of up to $300,000 per year. Indirect costs associated with
consortia or subcontracts will not be considered as part of the
$300,000 direct cost limit.
Although the financial plans of the NIH provide support for this
program, awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the
availability of funds and the receipt of a sufficient number of
meritorious applications.
ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS
You may submit an application if your institution is domestic and has
any of the following characteristics:
o For-profit or non-profit organizations
o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges,
hospitals, and laboratories
o Units of State and local governments
o Eligible agencies of the Federal Government
o Faith-based or community-based organizations
o Foreign institutions are not eligible to apply.
Applications from foreign institutions will not be accepted; however,
participating collaborators at foreign institutions may be included
through sub-contracts.
We welcome public-private partnerships, since academia and industry may
have the complementary capabilities needed for development and
commercialization of new technologies.
INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO BECOME PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS
Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to
carry out the proposed research is invited to work with their
institution to develop an application for support. Individuals from
under-represented racial and ethnic groups, as well as individuals with
disabilities, are always encouraged to apply for NIH programs.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Sharing of Results. All research resources (e.g., methods, tools,
materials) and information (e.g. IND filing information) developed in
these projects are expected to be made readily available to the
scientific community for non-profit research purposes. Applications
should include a sharing plan that includes criteria, mechanisms, and
timetables by which all the resources and information developed in the
course of the project will be shared. Sharing plans must be in accord
with the NIH Grants Policy Statement
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps/) and the Principles and
Guidelines for Recipients of NIH Research Grants and Contracts on
Obtaining and Disseminating Biomedical Research Resources: Final
Notice, December 1999
(http://www.ott.nih.gov/policy/rt_guide_final.html and
http://ott.od.nih.gov/NewPages/64FR72090.pdf). Applicants are invited
to utilize NIH supported repositories to make reagents widely available
to the scientific community. The adequacy of the proposed sharing plan
will be considered by NIH staff prior to award. The proposed sharing
plan, after negotiation with the applicant when necessary, will be made
a condition of the award.
Grantees Meetings: Principal Investigators are expected to attend an
annual meeting, most likely in the Bethesda, MD region, organized by
NIH. Investigators must include travel to this meeting as part of the
budget request and state a willingness to participate in this meeting.
WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES
We encourage inquiries concerning this RFA and welcome the opportunity
to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into
three areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants
management issues:
o Direct your questions about scientific/research issues to:
Alan McLaughlin, Ph.D.
Division of Applied Science and technology
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Building: Two Democracy Plaza, Room: 232
6707 Democracy Boulevard
Bethesda, MD 20892-5469
Telephone: (301) 496-9321
FAX: (301) 480-4973
Email: mclaugal@mail.nih.gov
Linda Brady
Neuropharmacology and Drug Discovery/Clinical Therapeutics Program
Division of Neuroscience and Basic Behavioral Science
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 7185
Bethesda, MD 20892-9641
Telephone: (301) 443-5288
Fax: (301) 402-4740
Email: lbrady@mail.nih.gov
Denis Buxton
Heart Research Program
Division of Heart and Vascular Diseases
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
6701 Rockledge Drive, Suite 9044
Bethesda, MD 20892-7940
Telephone: (301) 435-0516
Fax: (301) 480-1454
Email: buxtond@mail.nih.gov
Daofen Chen
Channels, Synapses, and Circuits Research
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
NIH Neuroscience Center, Room 2131
6001 Executive Boulevard
Bethesda, MD 20892-9523
Telephone: (301) 496-1917
Fax: (301) 402-1501
Email: Daofen.chen@nih.gov
James Deatherage
Cell Biology Branch
Division of Cell Biology and Biophysics
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
45 Center Drive, Room 2AS.13J
Bethesda, MD 20892-6200
Telephone: (301) 594-3828
Fax: (301) 480-2004
Email: deatherj@nigms.nih.gov
Eleni Kousvelari
Center for Biotechnology and Innovation
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Building 45, Room 4AN 18A
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: (301) 594-2427
Fax: (301) 480-8318
Email: kousvelarie@mail.nih.gov
Maren Laughlin
Metabolism Program
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 6101
Bethesda, MD 20892-5460
Telephone: (301) 594-8802
Fax: (301) (301) 480-3503
Email: laughlinm@mail.nih.gov
Abraham Levy
Division of Biomedical Technology Research and Research Resources
National Center for Research Resources
6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 970
Bethesda, MD 20892-4874
Telephone: (301) 435-0777
Fax: (301) 480-3659
Email: levyabra@mail.nih.gov
Bradley Ozenberger
Division of Extramural Research
National Human Genome Research Institute
5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076
Bethesda, MD 20892-9305
Telephone: (301) 451-4735
Fax: (301) 480-9305
Email: bozenger@mail.nih.gov
o Direct your questions about peer review issues to:
David T. George, Ph.D.
Office of Scientific Review
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Building: Two Democracy Plaza, Suite: 920, Room: 956
6707 Democracy Boulevard
Bethesda, MD 20892-5469
Bethesda, MD 20817 for express/courier service
Telephone: (301) 496-8633
FAX: (301) 480-0675
Email: georged@nih.gov
o Direct your questions about financial or grants management matters
to:
Nancy Curling
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Building: Two Democracy Plaza, Suite: 920
6707 Democracy Boulevard
Bethesda, MD, 20892-5469
Telephone: (301) 496-8633
FAX: (301) 480-4974
Email: curlingn@mail.nih.gov
LETTER OF INTENT
Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that
includes the following information:
o Descriptive title of the proposed research
o Name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator
o Names of other key personnel
o Participating Institutions
o Number and title of this RFA.
A letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter
into the review of a subsequent application. However, the information
it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload
and plan the review.
The letter of intent is to be sent by the date listed at the beginning
of this document, and should be sent to Dr. David T. George at the
address listed under WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES.
SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION
Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant
application instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). Applications must
have a DUN and Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number as the Universal Identifier when applying for Federal grants or
cooperative agreements. The D&B number can be obtained by calling (866)
705-5711 or through the web site at http://www.dunandbradstreet.com/.
The D&B number should be entered on line 11 of the face page of the PHS
398 form. The PHS 398 document is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in an
interactive format. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo,
Telephone (301) 710-0267, Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS: All PHS 398 requirements should be
followed, with the exception of items affected by the following
instructions:
o The total page limit for the Research Plan (items a d) may not
exceed a total of 15 pages. Items e-g (human subjects/vertebrate
animals/sharing plan) do not count against the page limit.
o Preliminary data (published or unpublished) are not required, but may
be included if available. However, preliminary data should be kept to
a minimum, and will not be a major criterion for review. More emphasis
will be placed on development of the proposed strategy based on the
combined insight, knowledge and experience of the research group.
o The only allowable items in the Appendix are original photographs or
color images, provided that a photocopy (may be reduced in size) is
also included within the 15-page limit of Items a-d of the research
plan. No photographs or color images may be included in the appendix
that are not also represented within the Research Plan. Publications,
manuscripts, abstracts, patents, or other printed materials are not
permitted and, if present, will not be forwarded to the review panel.
SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR MODULAR GRANT APPLICATIONS: Applications
requesting up to $250,000 per year in direct costs must be submitted in
a modular grant format. The modular grant format simplifies the
preparation of the budget in these applications by limiting the level
of budgetary detail. Applicants request direct costs in $25,000
modules. Section C of the research grant application instructions for
the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2002) at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html includes step-
by-step instructions for preparing modular grants. Additional
information on modular grants is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm.
USING THE RFA LABEL: The RFA label available in the PHS 398 (rev.
5/2001) application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page
of the application. Type the RFA number on the label. Failure to use
this label could result in delayed processing of the application such
that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. In
addition, the RFA title and number must be typed on line 2 of the face
page of the application form and the YES box must be marked. The RFA
label is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/label-bk.pdf.
SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH: Submit a signed, typewritten
original of the application, including the Checklist, and three signed,
photocopies, in one package to:
Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD 20892-7710
Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)
At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application and
all copies of the appendix material must be sent to Dr. David T. George
at the address listed under WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES.
APPLICATIONS PROCESSING: Applications must be received on or before the
application receipt date listed in the heading of this RFA. If an
application is received after this date, it will be returned to the
applicant without review.
Although there is no immediate acknowledgement of the receipt of an
application, applicants are generally notified of the review and
funding assignment within 8 weeks.
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will not accept any application
in response to this RFA that is essentially the same as one currently
pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending
application. However, when a previously unfunded application,
originally submitted as an investigator-initiated application, is to be
submitted in response to an RFA, it is to be prepared as a NEW
application. That is, the application for the RFA must not include an
Introduction describing the changes and improvements made, and the text
must not be marked to indicate the changes from the previous unfunded
version of the application.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the CSR
and responsiveness by NIBIB and the Roadmap project team. Incomplete
and/or non-responsive applications will not be reviewed.
Applications that are complete and responsive to this RFA will be
evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer-
review group convened by NIBIB in accordance with the review criteria
stated below. As part of the merit review, all applications will:
o Undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the
highest scientific merit, generally the top half of the applications
under review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score
o Receive a written critique
o Receive a second level of review by National Institute of Biomedical
Imaging and Bioengineering Advisory Council.
REVIEW CRITERIA
The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of
biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health.
In the written comments the reviewers will be asked to discuss the
following aspects of the application in order to judge the likelihood
that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the
pursuit of these goals. The scientific review group will address and
consider each of these criteria in assigning the application’s overall
score, weighting them as appropriate for each application:
o Significance
o Approach
o Innovation
o Investigator
o Environment
The application does not need to be strong in all categories to be
judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high
priority score.
SIGNIFICANCE: Does this study address an important problem? If the
aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be
advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or
methods that drive this field?
APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses
adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of
the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas
and consider alternative tactics?
INNOVATION: Does the project employ novel concept, approaches or
methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project
challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or
technologies?
INVESTIGATOR: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well-
suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the
experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers
(if any)?
ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be
done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed
experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific
environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there
evidence of institutional support?
ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA: In addition to the above criteria, the
following items will be considered in the determination of scientific
merit and the priority score.
o Since this RFA invites innovative research applications of unproven
feasibility, the Significance and Innovation review criteria are
especially important and should be emphasized.
o Preliminary data are optional and will not be a major criterion at
review. Greater emphasis will be placed on the proposed strategy based
on the combined insight, knowledge and experience of the research
group, and on the potential impact of the proposed research.
o Applicants need not have publications in the immediate research
topics proposed in the application, but should have a record of
accomplishment in relevant research areas to show they are capable of
carrying out the proposed work.
o Applicants should address the stated goal of developing new probes
that will achieve one to two orders of magnitude improvement in the
ability to detect and image specific molecular events in vivo, and also
have potential for clinical applications.
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FROM RESEARCH RISK: The involvement of
human subjects and protections from research risk relating to their
participation in the proposed research will be assessed. (See criteria
included in the section on Federal Citations, below).
INCLUSION OF WOMEN, MINORITIES AND CHILDREN IN RESEARCH: The adequacy
of plans to include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic
groups (and sub-groups), and children as appropriate for the scientific
goals of the research will be assessed. Plans for the recruitment and
retention of subjects will also be evaluated. (See Inclusion Criteria
in the sections on Federal Citations, below).
CARE AND USE OF VERTEBRATE ANIMALS IN RESEARCH: If vertebrate animals
are to be used in the project, the five items described under Section f
of the PHS 398 research grant application instructions (rev. 5/2001)
will be assessed.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS
SHARING RESEARCH DATA: All applications must include a data sharing
plan (see SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS section). The adequacy of the data
sharing plan will be assessed by the reviewers. However, reviewers
will not factor the proposed data sharing plan into the determination
of scientific merit or priority score.
BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested
period of support in relation to the proposed research will be
assessed.
RECEIPT AND REVIEW SCHEDULE
Letter of Intent Receipt Date: September 22, 2004
Application Receipt Date: October 22, 2004
Peer Review Date: March 2005
Council Review: May 2005
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: July 1, 2005
AWARD CRITERIA
Award criteria that will be used to make decisions include:
o Scientific merit (as determined by peer review)
o Level of innovation
o Relevance to program priorities and roadmap priorities
o Availability of funds
REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTIONS: Federal regulations (45CF46) require that
applications and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated
with reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection
against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the
subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge to be gained.
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH: It is the
policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their
sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research
projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided
indicating that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health
of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results
from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law
103-43).
All investigators proposing clinical research should read the NIH
Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in
Clinical Research Amended, October, 2001 , published in the NIH Guide
for Grants and Contracts on October 9, 2001
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html); a
complete copy of the updated Guidelines is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm.
The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition
of clinical research; updated racial and ethnic categories in
compliance with the new OMB standards; clarification of language
governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials consistent with the new
PHS Form 398; and updated roles and responsibilities of NIH staff and
the extramural community. The policy continues to require for all NIH-
defined Phase III clinical trials that: (a) all applications or
proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans to
conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender
and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and (b)
investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting
analyses, as appropriate, by sex, gender and/or racial/ethnic group
differences.
INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN
SUBJECTS: The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals
under the age of 21) must be included in all human subjects research,
conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and
ethical reasons not to include them. All investigators proposing
research involving humans subjects should read the NIH Policy and
Guidelines on the inclusion of children as participants in research
involving human subjects that is available at
http://www.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm.
REQUIRED EDUCATION ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECT PARTICIPANTS: NIH
policy requires education on the protection of human subjects
participants for all investigators submitting NIH proposals for
research involving human subjects. This policy announcement can be
found in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts Announcement, dated
June 5, 2000, at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS (hESC): Criteria for federal funding of
research on hESC’s can be found at http://stemcells.nih.gov/index.asp
and at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-01-005.html.
Only research using hESC lines that are registered in the
NIH Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal
funding (see http://escr.nih.gov). It is the responsibility of the
applicant to provide, in the project description and elsewhere in the
application as appropriate, the official NIH identifier(s) for the hESC
line(s) to be used in the proposed research. Applications that do not
provide this information will be returned without review.
PUBLIC ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT:
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been
revised to provide public access to research data through the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1)
first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in part with
Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency
in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a
regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is important for
applicants to understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH has
provided guidance at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm.
Applicants may wish to place data collected under this RFA in a public
archive which can provide protections for the data and manage the
distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application
should include a description of the archiving plan in the study design
and include information about this in the budget justification section
of the application. In addition, applicants should think about how to
structure informed consent statements and other human subjects
procedures given the potential for wider use of data collected under
this award.
STANDARDS FOR PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIABLE HEALTH INFORMATION:
The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued final
modification to the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable
Health Information , the Privacy Rule , on August 14, 2002. The
Privacy Rule is a Federal regulation under the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the
protection of individually identifiable health information, and is
administered and enforced by the DHHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR).
Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule
reside with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR website
(http://www.hhs.gov/ocr.) provides information on the Privacy Rule,
including a complete Regulation Text and a set of decision tools on the
question Am I a covered entity . Information on the impact of the
HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH processes involving the review, funding, and
progress monitoring of grants, cooperative agreements, and research
contracts can be found at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html.
URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS: All applications and proposals for NIH
funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations.
Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, Internet addresses
(URL s) should not be used to provide information necessary to the
review, because reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet
sites. Furthermore, we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be
compromised when they directly access an Internet site.
HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to
achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of
Healthy People 2010 , a PHS-led national activity for setting priority
areas. This RFA is related to one or more of the priority areas.
Potential applicants may obtain a copy of Healthy People 2010 at
http://www.healthypeople.gov.
AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS: This program is described in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance at http://www.cfda.gov/ and is not
subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order
12372 of Health Systems Agency review. Awards are made under the
authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act
as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52
and 45 CFR parts 74 and 92. All awards are subject to the terms and
conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the
NIH Grants Policy Statement. The NIH Grants Policy Statement can be
found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm.
The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-
free workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In
addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits
smoking in certain facilities (or, in some cases, any portion of a
facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care,
health care, or early childhood development services are provided to
children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and
advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
|
|
|
|
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
|
|
|
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health®
|