EXPIRED
RESEARCH ON MIND-BODY INTERACTIONS AND HEALTH RELEASE DATE: July 14, 2003 (see addendum NOT-OD-04-001) RFA: OD-03-008 Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR) (http://obssr.od.nih.gov) National Cancer Institute (NCI) (http://www.nci.nih.gov) National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) (http://nccam.nih.gov) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov) National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) (http://www.nidr.nih.gov) National Institute on Aging (NIA) (http://www.nia.nih.gov) National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) (http://www.niaaa.nih.gov) National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (http://www.nida.nih.gov) National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (http://www.niehs.nih.gov) CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBERS: 93.213, 93.837, 93.866, 93.273, 93.279, 93.864, 93.865, 93.399, 93.113, 93.114, 93.121 LETTER OF INTENT RECEIPT DATE: November 17, 2003 APPLICATION RECEIPT DATE: December 17, 2003 THIS RFA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION o Purpose of this RFA o Research Objectives o Mechanism of Support o Funds Available o Eligible Institutions o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators o Special Requirements o Where to Send Inquiries o Letter of Intent o Submitting an Application o Peer Review Process o Review Criteria o Receipt and Review Schedule o Award Criteria o Required Federal Citations PURPOSE OF THIS RFA The National Institutes of Health (NIH), through the participating Institutes, Centers, and Offices listed above, invite applications in support of research on mind-body interactions and health. "Mind-body interactions and health" refers to the relationships among cognitions, emotions, personality, social relationships, and health. Applicant institutions may request funds to conduct regular research projects (R01). A central goal of this program is to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation towards understanding the processes underlying mind-body interactions and health as well as towards the application of such basic knowledge into interventions and clinical practice in the promotion of health and the prevention or treatment of disease and disabilities. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The Public Health Service has documented that many of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. are attributable to social, behavioral, and lifestyle factors (e.g., tobacco use, lack of exercise, poor diet, and drug and alcohol abuse). Numerous studies have also documented that psychological stress is linked to a variety of health outcomes, and researchers and public health officials are becoming increasingly interested in understanding the nature of this relationship. Research has shown, for example, that psychological stress can contribute to increased heart disease and decreased immune system functioning. Other research has demonstrated that cognitions (attitudes, beliefs values), social support, prayer, and meditation can reduce psychological stress and contribute to positive health outcomes. Consequently, over the past decade the National Institutes of Health have increased efforts to encourage and support health and behavior research (e.g., Innovative Approaches to Disease Prevention Through Behavior Change, NIH Guide to Grants and Contracts, October 24, 1997; Maintenance of Behavioral Change, NIH Guide to Grants and Contracts, January 15, 2003). Mind-body research is viewed as one component of health and behavior research. In 1999, using funds especially appropriated by Congress to the OBSSR, the NIH issued a Request for Applications (RFA) for Centers for Mind-Body Interactions and Health (OD-99-005) and subsequently awarded five P50 Center Grants (http://obssr.od.nih.gov/Content/Research/Request_for_Applications_(RFAs)/mbpage.htm). On January 9 2003, NIH issued two related RFAs on Mind-Body Interactions and Health: Research Infrastructure Program (OB-03-004)(see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-OB-03-004.html) and Mind-Body Interactions and Health: Exploratory/developmental Research Program (OB-03-005) (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-OB-03-005.html). During approximately the same time period, the NIH has commissioned a series of reports from the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine, such as "New Horizons in Health: An Integrative Approach" (National Academy Press, 2001) and "Health and Behavior: The Interplay of Biological, Behavioral, and Societal Influences (National Academy Press, 2001). These reports include calls for expansion of interdisciplinary health research on mind-body topics. (See summary of recommendations at http://obssr.od.nih.gov/Publications/NRC-Reports.htm Research Topics Three areas of research are emphasized. In addition, special importance is given to mind-body research in diverse racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status populations (e.g., cultural beliefs regarding health; perceived racism and health; distrust of health care systems and health care utilization, perceived disability and health). The formation of multidisciplinary teams to perform the research of this initiative is viewed as essential. 1) The first area of emphasis is the effect of cognitions or personality (e.g., beliefs, attitudes, and values; modes of thinking) and of emotions on physical health. Included is research on social, psychological, behavioral, affective, and biological factors mediating these effects. What are the physiological, behavioral, and social pathways by which beliefs, attitudes, and values or particular stress- management interventions affect health? How do emotions, personality, and cognitions interact to affect health? 2) The second emphasis is on determinants or antecedents of health- related cognitions (beliefs, attitudes, or values; modes of thinking; decision-making styles). That is, given that some beliefs and attitudes have been shown to affect health, how are these beliefs, attitudes, and values developed, maintained, or changed? Specifically, this RFA will support research that addresses issues such as: What contributes to individual differences in the beliefs, attitudes, and values that affect health and biological processes? How are health-related beliefs, attitudes, and values formed, maintained, and changed? How do social class, family, culture, disability, age, gender, or ethnicity influence health-related beliefs, attitudes, values, or cognitive styles? 3) The third is on how stress influences physical health, including: (a) basic research investigating how affect, attitudes, beliefs, and values influence perceived stress, individual differences in the biology of stress, and interactions between stress and behavioral risk factors for disease; (b) behavioral, affective, and biological mediators of the relationship between stress and health or disease, (c) the evaluation of mind-body interventions (e.g., relaxation-based, cognitive therapy, or support group) for physical illness and/or biological functioning, and (d) the translation of successful interventions into programs deliverable in clinical settings. These interventions may be examined alone or in conjunction with other stress management techniques. Issues such as the following would be appropriate here: Through which psychological or physiological pathways do stress management approaches affect health? What are the effective components in successful stress- management practices? Does the combination of various stress management techniques improve outcome? Are particular stress- management interventions more effective for certain individuals, populations, or health outcomes? Can successful stress-management practices be effectively implemented in natural settings? What are the possible economic implications of utilizing stress management interventions? What are the factors that lead to individual differences in how stress is experienced and managed as well as in the health consequences of stress? Examples of topics of interest specific to the Institutes that have joined with OBSSR in supporting this initiative are: o NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE NCI is interested in research that examines how interactions among environmental, psychosocial, immune, neuroendocrine, genetic, and other biological factors affect the disease, its treatment and side- effects, and/or outcome. Research may involve cancer detection, prevention, treatment, or survivorship. Examples of relevant topics include host differences, sickness behaviors (e.g., nausea, fatigue, depression), and biological factors impacting tumor growth or metastasis (e.g., DNA damage and repair, apoptosis, angiogenesis). Interdisciplinary research and research that includes integrative conceptual models are encouraged. o NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE Mind-body interventions represent one of the major domains of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This domain includes CAM practices that intend to facilitate the mind's capacity to affect bodily functions and lessen symptoms of disease. These diverse practices are of interest to NCCAM and include, but are not limited to, various types of meditation; unconventional uses of hypnosis; prayer and other forms of mental healing; and art therapy. In addition, many traditional medical systems, such as Traditional Chinese and Ayurvedic Medicine utilize mind-body CAM techniques. NCCAM is also interested in research on the placebo effect and studies on practitioner-patient interactions. Specifically related to this RFA, NCCAM is interested in research involving the types of mind-body interventions described above that can help elucidate how personality, cognitions, emotions, as well as beliefs and attitudes, can effect physical health; and how and whether CAM mind-body interventions can enhance healing and reduce the physical manifestations of illness. In addition, certain mind-body interventions, including cognitive-behavioral therapies and various means of stress reduction, which are being adopted in some settings by mainstream medicine, continue to be of interest to NCCAM. NCCAM encourages CAM-related mind-body research that draws upon contemporary tools of neurobiology, neuroimmunology, and neuroendocrinology using state-of-the-art imaging, cellular, biochemical and molecular approaches. o NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE The NHLBI supports behavioral research designed to investigate the relationship between psychosocial factors (e.g., depression, social support, hostility, stress, emotions) and diseases and disorders of the circulation, respiratory system, blood, and sleep, including the mechanisms that mediate these associations. Other areas include motivational, (e.g., beliefs, attitudes and values), emotional and cognitive processes involved in the formation, change, or maintenance of health related behaviors. The interactions of these processes with sociocultural and socioeconomic factors are also important. Finally, the study of gene /environment interactions is important. This includes not only the influence of genes on behavior, but also the neurohormonal pathways through which psychosocial factors influence gene expression. In all of these areas, translation of basic research into clinical applications is also encouraged. o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH NIDCR encourages studies that investigate mind-body interactions with regard to oral and craniofacial diseases and disorders or dental treatments. Examples include, but are not limited to, studies of the effects of beliefs, affective states, or stress on the immune system as related to the onset, progression, or treatment of oral diseases or conditions such as the periodontal diseases, caries, head and neck cancers, temporomandibular joint and/or muscle disorders, herpetic and apthous lesions, oral manifestations of HIV infection, or oral mucosal wound healing following oral surgery. Studies identifying linkages between changes in orofacial appearance or function and psychosocial outcomes are also of interest, as are studies of the psychosocial impacts of acquired or congenital craniofacial conditions (e.g., cleft lip/palate) or studies of the range of psychosocial impacts associated with head/neck cancers and ablative or other treatments. The NIDCR also encourages studies that integrate oral biomarkers into the evaluation of effects of stress-management or other therapeutic interventions. Changes in salivary composition and flow are examples of oral biomarkers shown to be relevant to stress and its physiological impact. The relative accessibility of the oral cavity provides unique opportunities for non-invasive studies of psychophysiological responses associated with positive or negative life events, acute or chronic stress-inducing conditions, and psychological characteristics or psychiatric conditions. o NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING The NIA's mission is to improve the health and well-being of older Americans through research. The NIA is interested in a developmental life-course perspective of aging and mind-body effects on acute and chronic health, quality of life, functional capacity, and life expectancy/mortality. Research linking cognitive, affective, and/or perceived events (past, present, or ongoing) to maintenance of health, function, and quality of life in older adults is desired. How diseases common in late-life (e.g. hypertension, Type II diabetes, osteoarthritis, Alzheimer's disease) are modulated by the interactions of (a) physiological and neurological mechanisms with (b) cognitive, affective, perceptual, and social factors experienced by the older individual is of high interest. Research on how mind-body processes affect health disparities is especially encouraged, as is multilevel, multi-system and interdisciplinary research. Illustrative examples include: mind-body effects on longevity; early life experiences mediated via mind-body interactions and their effects on late-life health; the pathways and mechanisms through which mind-body interactions modulate behavior and cognitive functions in older individuals; the modulatory effects of age upon mind-body process, especially in relation to stress and cognitive processes; mind-body effects that are predictive of adherence to and benefit from an intervention; the cumulative effects of stress on the health of the elderly; the impact of optimism, happiness, or a positive attitude on well-being and health; the cognitive impact of social exclusion and disruptions to social functioning on health; the percepts and affective responses to one's socioeconomic and occupational environment and their effects on health; and the cumulative impact of extreme stress on health in low resource/low income and in-transition countries. o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM The NIAAA is particularly interested in mind-body interactions as they may impact the prevalence and incidence of alcohol abuse and alcoholism; as they may be disrupted by alcohol use; and as they may play a critical role in recovery from alcoholism. Mind-body interactions of importance include, spirituality, motivation, and craving, as well as the effects of stress, alienation or stigmatization. For example, the role of spirituality in achieving and maintaining sobriety is widely acknowledged, but well-designed research is needed to determine the underlying mechanisms. Such studies may lead to new strategies to improve alcoholism treatment or enhance relapse prevention. We need to understand how mind-body interactions may influence the risk for harmful drinking or contribute to protective factors. Mind-body interactions may also influence progress through stages of change, help-seeking behavior, or readiness for cognitive- behavioral therapy. It is anticipated that such knowledge could be incorporated into more effective means of preventing and treating alcohol disorders among adolescents as well as adult populations. In addition, the NIAAA is committed to reducing alcohol-related health disparities in vulnerable populations. The mind-body interaction may enhance understanding of how reactions to stress, stigma, racism, and discrimination may influence the incidence of alcohol abuse and alcoholism. o NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE Behavioral and social sciences research plays an important role in the NIDA's search for solutions to the complex social and public health problems posed by drug abuse and addiction. These scientific disciplines provide NIDA with the knowledge necessary to better predict, prevent, and treat drug abuse and addiction problems. NIDA is interested in supporting research that investigates the role of cognitive and/or emotional variables mediating or moderating the development of drug abuse and addiction from the initiation of drug abuse ("chipping" or occasional drug use), the maintenance or continuation of drug taking behaviors (chronic abuse, including escalation to compulsive abuse and its associated negative consequences), relapse, and characteristics of sustained abstinence. The study of cognitive and/or emotional factors (e.g., self-regulation, beliefs, self-attributes, perceived risks or benefit), that influence vulnerability or resilience to drug abuse, is also of interest. Investigators may study responsivity to acute drug challenge, including the examination of how physiological, motivational or subjective responses to drugs of abuse are influenced by cognitive and emotional variables (e.g., expectancy, affective state, emotional context, etc.). Also appropriate would be studies examining cognitive and emotional variables (e.g., coping, emotional regulation, self-efficacy) in the context of treatment or preventive interventions (e.g., role in adherence or compliance). The study of decisions and other cognitive processes, and their associated neural substrates, which give rise to sexual risk behavior, is also an area of research interest. Studies on the influence of physiological indicators of stress, stress perception or stress reactivity on drug abuse vulnerability or clinical outcome, may be included in proposed investigations. NIDA has an interest in supporting research that investigates the epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of medical, behavioral, health, and other consequences of drug abuse, including but not limited to HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B, and STD's. Research of interest includes, for example, identifying how drug use affects the sensory perceptual system and cognitive abilities such as planning and organizing in terms of risk behaviors. Given that drug users and their sex partners account for a substantial proportion of new HIV infections in the US each year, studies to improve under- standing of the behavioral, social, and environmental mechanisms that facilitate HIV transmission and other infectious diseases among drug users are welcome. NIDA's focus on health promotion and disease prevention encourages researchers to investigate strategies for tailoring interventions to optimize their beneficial effects to determine which interventions work, for whom, and under what conditions. o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES NIEHS is particularly interested in stimulating interdisciplinary research that seeks to prevent and reduce morbidity and mortality of environmentally induced diseases. In order to better understand the linkage between exposures to environmental agents and human disease, consideration should be given to behaviors that place individuals at risk of these exposures. NIEHS is interested in better understanding beliefs, knowledge, and attitudes associated with these exposures which will help elucidate the sources of body burden and allow scientists to design appropriate and effective strategies to reduce or eliminate exposure from one's environment. With regards to housing and the built environment where there are multiple environmental stressors (social, chemical, physical and biological), NIEHS is interested in exploring how these stressors impact health. New programs that seek to understand how health promotion activities (i.e. healthier nutritional choices, physical activity) and behavior change to reduce exposures can mitigate some of the untoward health outcomes in these environments are of particular interest. In general NIEHS is interested in exploring further the impact of social and economic factors on the health of the community and the individual, especially issues related to minority and immigrant communities who generally work in high injury and high stress jobs and live in substandard housing and environments. It is also important to NIEHS that these projects are able to communicate and disseminate their findings to have public health and policy impacts. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT This RFA is restricted to the NIH R01 award mechanism. As an applicant you will be solely responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project. This RFA is a one-time solicitation. Future unsolicited, competing-continuation applications based on your project will compete with all investigator-initiated applications and will be reviewed according to the customary peer review procedures. The anticipated award date is September through October 2004. Applications that are not funded in the competition described in this RFA may be resubmitted as NEW investigator-initiated applications using the standard receipt dates for NEW applications described in the instructions to the PHS 398 application. This RFA uses just-in-time concepts. It also uses the modular as well as the non-modular budgeting formats (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm). Specifically, if you are submitting an application with direct costs in each year of $250,000 or less, use the modular format. Otherwise follow the instructions for non-modular research grant applications. This program does not require cost sharing as defined in the current NIH Grants Policy Statement at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2001/part_i_1.htm . FUNDS AVAILABLE The participating ICs intend to commit at least $3,500,000 in FY 2004 or FY 2005 to fund approximately eleven (11) new grants in response to this RFA. You may request a project period of up to five years. Because the nature and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application, it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary. Although the financial plans of the IC(s) provide support for this program, awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the availability of funds and the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications. ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS You may submit (an) application(s) if your institution has any of the following characteristics: o For-profit or non-profit organizations o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, and laboratories o Units of State and local governments o Eligible agencies of the Federal government o Domestic or foreign o Faith-based or community-based organizations INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO BECOME PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research is invited to work with their institution to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH programs. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS a) ANNUAL MEETINGS AND COLLABORATION. You will be asked to participate in yearly meetings to report progress, discuss problems, and share information related to the conduct of your grant. Previous experience with such meetings has shown that they can provide opportunities for grantees to work collaboratively in various areas such as measurement of treatment fidelity and adherence, techniques for participant recruitment and retention, development and implementation of interventions, and data archiving and sharing. Cooperation across funded studies increases their value by facilitating the accumulation of comparable knowledge and experience. You should include in your budget funds for two or three investigators to attend the annual meetings to be held in Bethesda, MD, at or near the NIH. b) DATA SHARING. NIH expects and supports the timely release and sharing of final research data from NIH-supported studies for use by other researchers. Starting with the October 1, 2003 receipt date, investigators submitting an NIH application seeking $500,000 or more in direct costs in any single year are expected to include a plan for data sharing or state why data sharing is not possible. See http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html. WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES We encourage inquiries concerning this RFA and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into three areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management issues: o Direct inquiries regarding GENERAL ISSUES to: Ronald P. Abeles, Ph.D. Office of Behavioral and Social Research Office of the Director National Institutes of Health Gateway Building, Room 2C234, MSC 9205 7201 Wisconsin Avenue Bethesda, MD 20892-9205 Phone: 301-496-7859 E-mail: [email protected] o Direct inquiries regarding research interests and topics of SPECIFIC INSTITUTES AND CENTERS to: NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Paige A. McDonald, Ph.D. Basic Biobehavioral Research Branch Behavioral Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences National Cancer Institute 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7363 Executive Plaza North, Room 4062 Bethesda, MD 20892-7363 Phone: 301-496-8776 Fax: 301-435-7547 E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTNERNATIVE MEDICINE Nancy J. Pearson, Ph.D. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine National Institutes of Health 6707 Democracy Blvd., Room 401, MSC 5475 Bethesda, MD 20892 Phone: 301-594-0519 Fax: 301-480-3621 E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL HEART, LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE Sarah Knox, Ph.D. Behavioral Medicine Research Group Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 6701 Rockledge Drive - MSC 7936 Bethesda, MD 20892-7936 Phone: 301-435-0409 E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH Patricia S. Bryant, Ph.D. Clinical, Epidemiology, and Behavioral Research Branch Division of Population and Health Promotion Sciences National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research 45 Center Drive, Rm 4AS.43A Bethesda, MD 20892-6402 Phone: 301-594-2095 Fax: 301-480-8322 Email [email protected] NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING Jeffrey W. Elias, Ph.D. Individual Behavioral Processes Branch Behavioral & Social Research Program National Institute on Aging Gateway Bldg., Suite 533 Bethesda, MD 20892 Phone: 301-402-4156 Fax: 301-402-0051 Email: [email protected] NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM R. Thomas Gentry, Ph.D. Chief, Research Development and Health Disparities Programs Office of Collaborative Research National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Willco Building, Suite 302 6000 Executive Boulevard MSC 7003 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003 Phone: (301) 443-6009 Fax: (301) 480-2358 Email: [email protected] NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE Ro Nemeth-Coslett, PhD National Institute on Drug Abuse Division of Treatment Research and Development Clinical Neurobiology Branch NSC Rm 4234 MSC 9551 6001 Executive Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892-9551 Phone: 301-402-1746 Fax: 301-443-6814 E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES Shobha Srinivasan, Ph.D. Susceptibility and Population Health Branch National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-21 111 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Phone: 919-541-2506 Fax: 919-316-4606 E-mail: [email protected] o Direct your questions about peer review issues to: Michael Micklin, Ph.D. Chief of Risk, Prevention, & Health Behavior Integrated Review Group SRA for SPIP Study Section Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health 6701 Rockledge Drive, Rm. 3136 MSC 7759 Bethesda, MD 20814-9692 Phone: 301-435-1258 Fax: 301-594-6363 E-mail: [email protected] o Direct your questions about financial or grants management matters to: NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Crystal Wolfrey Grants Administration Branch National Cancer Institute Executive Plaza South, Room 243 Bethesda, Maryland 20892 Phone: 301-496-8634 E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTNERNATIVE MEDICINE Victoria Carper Grants Management Officer National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine National Institutes of Health 6707 Democracy Blvd., Room 401, MSC 5475 Bethesda, MD 20892 Phone: 301-594-9102 E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE Tanya McCoy Grants Operations Branch Division of Extramural Affairs National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 6701 Rockledge Drive - MSC 7926 Bethesda, MD 20892-7926 Phone: 301-435-0171 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH Mary E. Daley National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research 45 Center Dr MSC 6402 Bethesda, MD 20892-6402 Phone: 301-594-4800 Fax: 301-480-8303 E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING Traci Lafferty Grants Management Specialist National Institute on Aging Gateway Building, Suite 2N212 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, MSC 9205 Bethesda, MD 20892-9205 Phone: 301-496-8987 Fax: 301-402-3672 Email: [email protected] NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM Judy Fox (formerly, Simons) Chief, Grants Management Branch Office of Planning and Resource Management National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Willco Building, Suite 504 6000 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7003 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003 Phone: 301-443-4704 Fax: 301-443-3891 Email: [email protected] NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE Gary Fleming, J.D., M.A. National Institute on Drug Abuse Office of Planning and Resource Management Grants Management Branch 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3131 MSC 9541 Bethesda, MD 20892-9541 Phone: 301-443-6710 Fax: 301-594-6847 E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES Susan Ricci Grants Management Office National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-21 111 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Phone: 919-316-4666 Fax: 919-541-2860 E-mail: [email protected] LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information: o Descriptive title of the proposed research o Name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator o Names of other key personnel o Participating institutions o Number and title of this RFA Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows us to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review. You should send your letter of intent by the November 17, 2003 to: Ronald P. Abeles, Ph.D. Office of Behavioral and Social Research Office of the Director National Institutes of Health Gateway Building, Room 2C234, MSC 9205 7201 Wisconsin Avenue Bethesda, MD 20892-9205 Phone: 301-496-7859 E-mail: [email protected] SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION You must prepare applications using the PHS 398 research grant application instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). The PHS 398 is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in an interactive format. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone (301) 710-0267, Email: [email protected] . SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR MODULAR GRANT APPLICATIONS: Applications requesting up to $250,000 per year in direct costs must be submitted in a modular grant format. The modular grant format simplifies the preparation of the budget in these applications by limiting the level of budgetary detail. Applicants request direct costs in $25,000 modules. Section C of the research grant application instructions for the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001) at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html includes step- by-step guidance for preparing modular grants. Additional information on modular grants is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm. USING THE RFA LABEL: The RFA label available in the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001) application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the application. Type the RFA number on the label. Failure to use this label could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. In addition, the RFA title and number must be typed on line 2 of the face page of the application form and the YES box must be marked. The RFA label is also available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/label-bk.pdf. SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH: Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the Checklist, and five signed, photocopies, in one package to: Center For Scientific Review National Institutes Of Health 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710 Bethesda, MD 20892-7710 Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service) APPLICATION PROCESSING: Applications must be received on or before the application receipt date listed in the heading of this RFA. If an application is received after that date, it will be returned to the applicant without review. Although there is no immediate acknowledgement of the receipt of an application, applicants are generally notified of the review and funding assignment within 8 weeks. The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will not accept any application in response to this RFA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. However, when a previously unfunded application, originally submitted as an investigator-initiated application, is to be submitted in response to an RFA, it is to be prepared as a NEW application. That is the application for the RFA must not include an Introduction describing the changes and improvements made, and the text must not be marked to indicate the changes. While the investigator may still benefit from the previous review, the RFA application is not to state explicitly how. PEER REVIEW PROCESS Upon receipt, CSR will review applications for completeness, and OBSSR will review applications for responsiveness. CSR will return incomplete applications to the applicant without further consideration. Furthermore, if the application is not responsive to the RFA, NIH staff may contact you to determine whether to return the application to the applicant or submit it for review in competition with unsolicited applications at the next appropriate NIH review cycle. An appropriate peer review group will evaluate applications, which are complete and responsive to the RFA, for scientific and technical merit in accordance with the review criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, all applications will: o Receive a written critique o Undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of the applications under review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score o Receive a second level review by an appropriate national advisory council or board. REVIEW CRITERIA The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In the written comments, reviewers will be asked to discuss the following aspects of the application in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals: o Significance o Approach o Innovation o Investigator o Environment The scientific review group will address and consider each of these criteria in assigning the application's overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. The application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move a field forward. SIGNIFICANCE: Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field? APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? INNOVATION: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? INVESTIGATOR: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)? ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support? PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FROM RESEARCH RISK: The involvement of human subjects and protections from research risk relating to their participation in the proposed research will be assessed. (See criteria included in the section on Federal Citations, below). INCLUSION OF WOMEN, MINORITIES AND CHILDREN IN RESEARCH: The adequacy of plans to include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic groups (and subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be evaluated. (See Inclusion Criteria in the sections on Federal Citations, below). CARE AND USE OF VERTEBRATE ANIMALS IN RESEARCH: If vertebrate animals are to be used in the project, the five items described under Section f of the PHS 398 research grant application instructions (rev. 5/2001) will be assessed. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS o DATA SHARING: The adequacy of any proposed plan to share data in accordance with the NIH Statement on Sharing of Research Data, http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html. o BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested period of support in relation to the proposed research. RECEIPT AND REVIEW SCHEDULE Letter of Intent Receipt Date: November 17, 2003 Application Receipt Date: December 17, 2003 Peer Review Date: April 2004 Council Review: June/September 2004 Earliest Anticipated Start Date: October 2004 AWARD CRITERIA Award criteria that will be used to make award decisions include: o Scientific merit (as determined by peer review) o Availability of funds o Programmatic priorities. REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION: Federal regulations (45CFR46) require that applications and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated with reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH: It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). All investigators proposing clinical research should read the "NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research - Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts on October 9, 2001 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html); a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm. The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials consistent with the new PHS Form 398; and updated roles and responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy continues to require for all NIH- defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and b) investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group differences. INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS: The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them. This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for receipt dates after October 1, 1998. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as participants in research involving human subjects that is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm REQUIRED EDUCATION ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECT PARTICIPANTS: NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants for all investigators submitting NIH proposals for research involving human subjects. You will find this policy announcement in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts Announcement, dated June 5, 2000, at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html. PUBLIC ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to provide public access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm. Applicants may wish to place data collected under this RFA in a public archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include information about this in the budget justification section of the application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the potential for wider use of data collected under this award. Also see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html. STANDARDS FOR PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIABLE HEALTH INFORMATION: The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued final modification to the "Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information", the "Privacy Rule," on August 14, 2002. The Privacy Rule is a federal regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually identifiable health information, and is administered and enforced by the DHHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR). Those who must comply with the Privacy Rule (classified under the Rule as "covered entities") must do so by April 14, 2003 (with the exception of small health plans which have an extra year to comply). Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR website (http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/) provides information on the Privacy Rule, including a complete Regulation Text and a set of decision tools on "Am I a covered entity?" Information on the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH processes involving the review, funding, and progress monitoring of grants, cooperative agreements, and research contracts can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html. URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES: All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations. Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, Internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide information necessary to the review because reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites. Furthermore, we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be compromised when they directly access an Internet site. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This RFA is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople. AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS: This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance at http://www.cfda.gov/ and is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The NIH Grants Policy Statement can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm. The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke- free workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
| ||||||
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health® |