and Human Services (HHS)
EXPIRED
MIND-BODY INTERACTIONS AND HEALTH: RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (R24)
RELEASE DATE: January 9, 2003 (Reissued as RFA-OD-06-005)
RFA: OB-03-004
Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR)
(http://obssr.od.nih.gov)
Fogarty International Center (FIC)
(http://www.fic.nih.gov/)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
(http://www.nci.nih.gov)
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
(http://nccam.nih.gov)
National Eye Institute (NEI)
(http://www.nei.nih.gov)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
(http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov)
National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
(http://www.niaaa.nih.gov)
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
(http://www.niaid.nih.gov)
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
(http://www.niams.nih.gov/)
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
(http://www.nichd.nih.gov)
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
(http://www.nidr.nih.gov)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
(http://www.niddk.nih.gov)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
(http://www.nimh.nih.gov)
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
(http://www.nia.nih.gov)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
(http://www.nida.nih.gov)
LETTER OF INTENT RECEIPT DATE: June 16, 2003
APPLICATION RECEIPT DATE: July 16, 2003
THIS RFA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
o Purpose of this RFA
o Research Objectives
o Mechanism(s) of Support
o Funds Available
o Eligible Institutions
o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators
o Special Requirements
o Where to Send Inquiries
o Letter of Intent
o Submitting an Application
o Peer Review Process
o Review Criteria
o Receipt and Review Schedule
o Award Criteria
o Required Federal Citations
PURPOSE OF THIS RFA
The National Institutes of Health (NIH), through the participating
Institutes, Centers, and Offices listed above, invite applications for
infrastructure grants in support of research on mind-body interactions
and health. "Mind-body interactions and health" refers to the
relationships among cognitions, emotions, personality, social
relationships, and health. Applicant institutions may request funds to
support infrastructure and research designed to (1) enhance the quality
and quantity of mind-body and health research and (2) develop new
research capabilities to advance mind-body and health research through
innovative approaches. A central goal of this program is to facilitate
interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation in mind-body and health
research while providing essential and cost-effective core services in
support of the development, conduct, and translation into practice of
mind-body and health research based in centers or comparable
administrative units.
This announcement invites applications for RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE
PROGRAM R24 grant awards. The companion announcement (RFA-OB-03-005,
Mind-Body Interactions and Health: Exploratory/Developmental Research
Program) solicits applications for R21 awards, which are intended to
support the development and demonstrate the feasibility of programs at
institutions that have high potential for advancing mind-body and health
research, but have not yet fully achieved the necessary resources and
mechanisms to qualify for a Research Infrastructure Award.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Background
The Public Health Service has documented that many of the leading
causes of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. are attributable to
social, behavioral, and lifestyle factors (e.g., tobacco use, lack of
exercise, poor diet, and drug and alcohol abuse). Numerous studies
have also documented that psychological stress is linked to a variety
of health outcomes, and researchers and public health officials are
becoming increasingly interested in understanding the nature of this
relationship. Research has shown, for example, that psychological
stress can contribute to increased heart disease and decreased immune
system functioning. Other research has demonstrated that cognitions
(attitudes, beliefs, values), social support, prayer, and meditation
can reduce psychological stress and contribute to positive health
outcomes. Consequently, over the past decade the National Institutes
of Health have increased efforts to encourage and support health and
behavior research (e.g., RFA on Innovative Approaches to Disease
Prevention Through Behavior Change, NIH Guide to Grants and Contracts,
Volume 26, Number 36, October 24, 1997). Mind-body research is viewed
as one component of health and behavior research. In 1999, using funds
especially appropriated by Congress to the OBSSR, the NIH issued a
Request for Applications (RFA) for Centers for Mind-Body Interactions
and Health (OD-99-005) and subsequently awarded five P50 Center Grants
(http://obssr.od.nih.gov/Content/Research/Request_for_Applications_(RFAs)/mbpage.htm).
More recently, the NIH has commissioned a series of reports from the
National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine, such as "New
Horizons in Health: An Integrative Approach" (National Academy Press,
2001) and "Health and Behavior: The Interplay of Biological,
Behavioral, and Societal Influences (National Academy Press, 2001).
These reports include calls for expansion of interdisciplinary health
research on mind-body topics. (See summary of recommendations at
http://obssr.od.nih.gov/Publications/NRC-Reports.htm.)
Objectives and Scope
The primary purposes of the Mind-body and Health Research Infrastructure
Program are to provide resources to support and advance research that
will improve the understanding of mind-body interactions and health,
facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration among investigators
conducting health-related mind-body research, and promote innovative
approaches to mind-body and health research questions. An additional
goal is to facilitate interaction among scientists in locations
throughout the United States in order to contribute to the integration
and coordination of mind-body and health research.
The INFRASTRUCTURE AWARD (R24) retains some of the characteristics of
traditional P30 and P50 grants. It will provide infrastructure to
support a portfolio of mind-body and health research housed in or
coordinated by a center or other research unit (hereafter, "research
unit" or "unit") at an institution. However, it is designed to move
beyond the traditional center grant mechanism to allow institutions to
pursue aggressively scientific opportunities in mind-body and health
research and to facilitate partnerships among diverse scientists and
institutions. The Infrastructure Award permits a streamlined format
that allows more flexible use of funds to address not only the core
support needs of existing projects, but also the development of new
directions and approaches to mind-body and health research and the
translation of research findings into practice. It asks applicant
institutions to design and propose infrastructure programs that will
serve to advance the interdisciplinary reach, innovation, and impact of
their research programs, in addition to serving the existing needs of
researchers. It also allows and encourages the development of
infrastructure that broadly serves the field of mind-body and health
research.
Applicant institutions responding to this RFA must articulate a clear
vision for their research unit and its current and future contributions
to mind-body and health research. Applicant institutions must identify
the central scientific objectives and themes of the unit, and these must
be relevant to the NIH mission. Illustrative examples of mind-body and
health research topics that fall within the mission are listed below.
Applicant institutions are encouraged to consult with program staff
listed under INQUIRIES to determine the relevance of other topics to the
NIH mission.
Research Topics
Three areas of research are emphasized. In addition, special
importance is given to mind-body research in diverse racial/ethnic and
socioeconomic status populations (e.g., cultural beliefs regarding
health; perceived racism and health; distrust of health care systems
and health care utilization). The formation of multidisciplinary teams
to perform the research of this initiative is viewed as essential.
1. The first area of emphasis is the effect of cognitions or
personality (e.g., beliefs, attitudes, and values; modes of thinking)
and of emotions on physical health. Included is research on social,
psychological, behavioral, affective, and biological factors mediating
these effects. What are the physiological, behavioral, and social
pathways by which beliefs, attitudes, and values or particular stress-
management interventions affect health? How do emotions, personality,
and cognitions interact to affect health?
2. The second emphasis is on determinants or antecedents of health-
related cognitions (beliefs, attitudes, or values; modes of thinking;
decision-making styles). That is, given that some beliefs and
attitudes have been shown to affect health, how are these beliefs,
attitudes, and values developed, maintained, or changed?
Specifically, this RFA will support research that addresses issues such
as: What contributes to individual differences in the beliefs,
attitudes, and values that affect health and biological processes? How
are health-related beliefs, attitudes, and values formed, maintained,
and changed? How do social class, family, culture, disability, age,
gender, or ethnicity influence health-related beliefs, attitudes,
values, or cognitive styles?
3. The third is on how stress influences physical health, including:
(a) basic research investigating how affect, attitudes, beliefs, and
values influence perceived stress, individual differences in the
biology of stress, and interactions between stress and behavioral risk
factors for disease; (b) behavioral, affective, and biological
mediators of the relationship between stress and health or disease, (c)
the evaluation of mind-body interventions (e.g., relaxation-based,
cognitive therapy, or support group) for physical illness and/or
biological functioning, and (d) the translation of successful
interventions into programs deliverable in clinical settings. These
interventions may be examined alone or in conjunction with other stress
management techniques.
Issues such as the following would be appropriate here: Through which
psychological or physiological pathways do stress management approaches
affect health? What are the effective components in successful stress-
management practices? Does the combination of various stress
management techniques improve outcome? Are particular stress-
management interventions more effective for certain individuals,
populations, or health outcomes? Can successful stress-management
practices be effectively implemented in natural settings? What are the
possible economic implications of utilizing stress management
interventions? What are the factors that lead to individual
differences in how stress is experienced and managed as well as in the
health consequences of stress?
Examples of topics of interest specific to the Institutes that have
joined with OBSSR in supporting this initiative are:
o FORGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER
FIC is particularly interested in Mind-Body programs that draw upon,
enhance, or expand existing FIC-funded biomedical and behavioral
research collaborations between U.S. scientists and scientists in low-
to middle-income countries that address global health issues. For
example, research exploring the impact of attitudes and values on
Tobacco use initiation and cessation in developing countries, the
effects of beliefs and stress associated with Stigma on health
outcomes, and the potential influence of attitudes and behaviors on
susceptibility and response to treatment for HIV/AIDS and other
infectious diseases might complement and synergize with existing FIC
programs. In addition, many developing countries have populations with
considerable experience in the use of mind-body interaction techniques
in their traditional medicines and this may be one avenue to explore
within larger collaborative research programs. Any area of research
within existing FIC programs that can meaningfully incorporate mind-
body issues would be of interest (see FIC website). FIC will not make
independent awards, but will work in partnership with other NIH
components on this program.
o NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
NCI is especially interested in stimulating research that examines
interactions among environmental factors, psychosocial variables,
immune, neuroendocrine, genetic, and other potential biological
mediators and disease related outcomes. Such research may scan the
cancer control continuum, from prevention to survivorship, and may
include a focus on such relevant topics as host individual differences,
"sickness behaviors" (e.g., nausea, fatigue), and biological factors
impacting tumor growth or metastasis beyond immune surveillance (e.g,
DNA damage and repair, apoptosis, angiogenesis). Special emphasis is
place on interdisciplinary research and integrative conceptual models.
o NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTNERNATIVE MEDICINE
Mind-body interventions represent one of the major domains of
complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This domain includes CAM
practices that intend to facilitate the mind's capacity to affect
bodily functions and lessen symptoms of disease. These diverse
practices are of interest to NCCAM and include, but are not limited to,
various types of meditation; unconventional uses of hypnosis; prayer
and other forms of mental healing; and art therapy. In addition, many
traditional medical systems, such as Traditional Chinese and Ayurvedic
Medicine utilize mind-body CAM techniques. NCCAM is also interested in
research on the placebo effect and studies on practitioner-patient
interactions. Specifically related to this RFA, NCCAM is interested in
research involving the types of mind-body interventions described above
that can help elucidate how personality, cognitions, emotions, as well
as beliefs and attitudes, can effect physical health; and how and
whether CAM mind-body interventions can enhance healing and reduce the
physical manifestations of illness. In addition, certain mind-body
interventions, including cognitive-behavioral therapies and various
means of stress reduction, which are being adopted in some settings by
mainstream medicine, continue to be of interest to NCCAM. NCCAM
encourages CAM-related mind-body research that draws upon contemporary
tools of neurobiology, neuroimmunology, and neuroendocrinology using
state-of-the-art imaging, cellular, biochemical and molecular
approaches.
o NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE
The NEI is interested in supporting research that aims to investigate
the relationship between psychosocial factors and their relationship to
visual disorders. Most of the significant causes of blindness and
visual impairment are associated with aging, and age-related macular
degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy are major causes of severe
vision loss in the elderly. Decreased vision in the elderly and others
affects their quality of life and their ability to perform normal
activities of daily living, such as driving, reading, and interacting
socially. The dissemination and use of visual health information and
visual impairment rehabilitation are crosscutting areas of emphasis in
visual health that are impacted by social, psychological and behavioral
domains. Beliefs and values critically influence the use of vision
care services in at-risk populations. Research has shown that in some
at-risk populations, knowledge and access to dilated eye examinations
as an effective means of detecting treatable retinopathy nonetheless do
not get regular dilated eye examinations. Underlying social,
behavioral and psychological factors also influence compliance in the
use of assistive devices, environmental modifications and
rehabilitation strategies by visually impaired persons. Areas of
research that address these and other topics which meaningfully
incorporate mind-body issues relevant to visual health would be
considered responsive to this announcement.
o NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE
The NHLBI supports behavioral research designed to investigate the
relationship between psychosocial factors (e.g., depression, social
support, stress, emotions) and diseases and disorders of the
circulation, respiratory system, and blood, or sleep disorders. Other
areas include the cognitive, emotional, motivational and other
processes involved in risk assessment, decision-making and formation,
change, or maintenance of health habits. Of particular interest are
interactions between any of the above and the social environment, and
translation of basic behavioral research to clinical applications.
Finally, study of the interaction between psychosocial factors and
genetic endowment is encouraged. The Institute supports a wide range
of research on the etiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention
of these disorders, and welcomes integrative, multidisciplinary
behavioral research in any of these areas.
o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM
The NIAAA is particularly interested in the mind-body interaction as it
enhances our understanding of alcohol abuse and alcoholism and the way
this interaction impacts the prevalence and incidence of alcohol abuse
and alcoholism. Studies of mind-body interactions may include, but not
be limited to, research on the influence of spirituality, stress, and
cognitive-behavioral factors on the development and maintenance of
drinking behavior, treatment of alcohol disorders, and relapse. While
the role of spirituality in achieving and maintaining sobriety is
widely acknowledged, research is needed to determine the underlying
mechanisms involved and thereby suggest new therapeutic strategies to
optimize treatment and enhance relapse prevention. We need to
understand how mind-body interactions may influence risk and resilience
factors, e.g., stress and self-reliance. The mind-body interaction may
influence the intervention process, particularly cognitive-behavioral
techniques. It is anticipated that such knowledge could be
incorporated into more effective means of preventing and treating
alcohol disorders among adolescents as well as adult populations.
Additionally, the NIAAA is committed to reducing alcohol-related health
disparities in vulnerable populations. The mind-body interaction may
enhance understanding of how reactions to stress, stigma, racism, and
discrimination may influence the incidence to alcohol abuse and
alcoholism.
o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES
NIAID is interested in research that will further our understanding of
the mind-body interrelationships as they relate to the susceptibility
of an individual to infectious diseases such as HIV-AIDS and malaria,
or the development of chronic diseases such as tuberculosis, hepatitis,
pneumonia, and sinusitis. Examples of topics of interest include: the
role of stress on reactivation of latent intracellular pathogens and
susceptibility or resistance to infectious diseases, characterization
of the effects of stress on microbial pathogenesis within the context
of co-infections or nutritional status, identification of molecules
regulating immune-nervous system interactions, the effects of stress on
innate and adaptive immunity including the effects on the secretion of
inflammatory mediators and the redistribution of immunocompetent
lymphocytes, and the impact of immune deficiency on function of the
nervous system. It is anticipated that these studies will be designed
on the basis of sound scientific arguments with clearly defined outcome
measures such as cytokine profiles, functional assays for humoral or
cell mediated immune responses, and assessment of intracellular
signaling molecules. The use of novel approaches, recent technologies
in genomics, proteomics, immunology and molecular biology as well as
the creation of collaborative scientific teams are particularly
encouraged.
o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN
DISEASES
NIAMS is interested in mind-body research relevant to arthritis and
other rheumatic diseases, muscle diseases, musculoskeletal disorders,
bone diseases including osteoporosis, and skin diseases. Research on
stress-related alterations in physiological function with potential
health consequences in autoimmune diseases (e.g., stress and flares in
systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis) and evaluation of
mind-body interventions in diseases within the NIAMS mission are
especially of interest.
o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPOMENT
NICHD is particularly interested in interdisciplinary research projects
examining mind/body interactions that influence child health and
development. Studies are encouraged that: examine the
interrelationship of socio-economic status and/or poverty with child
health and development; examine the interrelation of mind/body
interactions as explanations of health disparities in children and
young adults; examine psychological stress and pain in children and
adolescents and their effects on the immune system and illness; examine
the influence of religiosity and spiritualism on risk behaviors and
health in children and adolescents; examine the use of complementary
medicines in the treatment of childhood illnesses and disorders (otitis
media, colds, chronic fatigue syndrome, ADHD, etc.); examine
infrequently used techniques in the treatment of childhood conditions
of pain or stress ( suggestive relaxation techniques for migraine
headaches and other painful conditions, massage therapy for infants
born at risk, acupuncture, hypnosis, etc.); examine children's
understanding of health and illness and how that understanding relates
(translates) to health behavior; study the behavioral treatment of
sleep disorders in children and adolescents; examine the impact of
mind/body interactions on the physiology of pregnancy and the infant in
relation to health outcome; study the effects of mind/body interactions
on fertility, maternal health during pregnancy, labor, delivery and
postpartum periods, breast feeding patterns, and nurturing and rearing
of infants and children by both parents- especially, fathers; examine
the role of health-related beliefs or attitudes on achieving and
maintaining health and well-being of children and youth with physical,
learning or developmental disabilities; examine mind/body interactions
in children with physical disabilities caused by injury and their
adaptation to the impairments.
o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH
NIDCR encourages studies that investigate mind-body interactions with
regard to oral and craniofacial diseases and disorders or dental
treatments. Examples include, but are not limited to studies of the
effects of beliefs, affective states, or stress on the immune system as
related to the onset, progression, or treatment of oral
diseases/conditions such as the periodontal diseases, caries, head and
neck cancers, temporomandibular joint and/or muscle disorders, herpetic
and apthous lesions, oral manifestations of HIV infection, or oral
mucosal wound healing following oral surgery. Stress as a result of
living with craniofacial anomalies such as cleft lip and cleft palate
and disfigurement following treatment of head and neck cancers may also
have an adverse effect on the immune system and treatment outcomes;
studies examining these linkages and interventions to improve outcomes
are encouraged. The NIDCR also encourages studies that integrate oral
biomarkers into the evaluation of effects of stress-management or other
therapeutic interventions. Changes in salivary composition and flow
are examples of oral biomarkers shown to be relevant to stress and its
physiological impact. The relative accessibility of the oral cavity
provides unique opportunities for non-invasive studies of
psychophysiological responses associated with positive or negative life
events, acute or chronic stress-inducing conditions, and psychological
characteristics or psychiatric conditions.
o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES
NIDDK is interested particularly in mind-body and health research
related to (a) obesity and (b) functional bowel disorders. Examples
relevant to OBESITY are: The influence of social stress, depression,
anxiety, fear, and insecurity leading to or resulting from significant
life events such as divorce, job loss, economic deprivation, social
discrimination, and related factors that predispose individuals to
inappropriate eating behaviors, inappropriate sedentary behaviors, and
inadequate physical activity behaviors associated with the development
of overweight and obesity. The role of self-confidence, self-esteem,
self-efficacy, self-motivation, self-image, self-perception,
religiosity/faith, social and family support networks, anger, conflict
resolution, cultural beliefs, and related factors in the primary
prevention of inappropriate weight gain, weight maintenance in those
already overweight, and prevention of weight regain in those who have
lost weight. Psycho-social factors that stimulate motivation and lead
to behavioral changes whereby individuals accept a greater
responsibility for their personal dietary and physical activity health
behaviors in the context of a challenging environment that promotes
overeating and sedentary behaviors. Psycho-social factors associated
with unfavorable behaviors such as night eating, binge eating, food
cravings, or sedentary behaviors such as television watching that lead
to energy imbalance attributable to excess caloric consumption and/or
insufficient energy expenditure. Examples relevant to FUNCTIONAL BOWEL
DISORDERS are: The influence of gestational hormonal changes and its
influences on visceral hypersensitivity in the setting of functional
bowel disorders. Studies on the role of peptide hormones released in
the circulation in response to either stress, chemical, or mechanical
stimulation of the gut mucosa may provide insights into treatment
options for patients with functional bowel disorders. Comparisons of
the efficacy of non-pharmacological (i.e. Cognitive behavioral therapy,
hypnosis) to pharmacological approaches in the management of functional
bowel disorders. Research on psychosocial factors such as depression,
low self-esteem, isolation, and how they impact on disease expression
and severity and quality of life of patients who have irritable bowel
syndrome and other functional gastrointestinal disorders.
o NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH
The mission of NIMH is to reduce the burden of mental illness and
behavioral disorders through research on mind, brain, and behavior.
With regard to this RFA, the following are illustrative topics:
Mechanisms accounting for the co-occurrence and co-morbidity of mental
disorders with physical disorders; identification of principles
motivating and sustaining behavior changes to reduce the risk for co-
occurring mental and physical disorders; relationships of pain to
mental disorder; interventions to prevent the occurrence of mental
health problems in individuals with physical disorders; tests of
innovative treatments for individuals with co-occurring mental and
physical disorders; social, psychological, and neurobiological factors
underlying stress responsivity; "social neuroscience" investigations to
uncover mechanisms underlying effects of interpersonal, social and
other environmental factors on mental and physical health and disease;
influences of cognitive, personality, interpersonal and cultural
factors on perceptions of risk, help-seeking, symptom reporting and
health-related behavior; identification of neural substrates underlying
cognitive functions that influence emotional and stress reactivity; and
identification of hormonal, biochemical, and cellular pathways
mediating effects of stress and illness on cognition and mood.
Experimental approaches should encompass the range of cutting-edge
methods in social and behavioral science as well as neuroscience.
o NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING
The NIA's mission is to improve the health and well-being of older
Americans through research. The NIA is interested in a developmental
life-course perspective of aging and mind-body effects on acute and
chronic health, quality of life, functional capacity, and life
expectancy/mortality. How diseases common in late-life (e.g.
hypertension, Type II diabetes, osteoarthritis, Alzheimer's disease)
are modulated by physiological, neurological, cognitive, affective,
perceptual, and psychosocial factors experienced by the older
individual is of high interest. Research on how mind-body processes
affect health disparities is especially encouraged, as is
multilevel/multi-system and interdisciplinary research. Illustrative
examples include: mind-body effects on longevity; early life
experiences mediated via mind-body interactions and their effects on
late life health; mind-body effects that are predictive of adherence to
and benefit from an intervention; the cumulative effects of stress on
the health of the elderly; the impact of optimism, happiness, or a
positive attitude on well-being and health; the cognitive impact of
social exclusion and disruptions to social functioning on health; the
percepts and affective responses to one's socioeconomic and
occupational environment and their effects on health; and the
cumulative impact of extreme stress on health in low resource/low
income and in-transition countries.
o NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE
NIDA is interested in supporting research that investigates the role of
cognitive and/or emotional variables mediating or moderating the
development of drug abuse and addiction. NIDA is interested in the
initiation of drug abuse ("chipping" or occasional drug use), the
maintenance or continuation of drug taking behaviors (chronic abuse,
including escalation to compulsive abuse and its associated negative
consequences), relapse, and characteristics of sustained abstinence.
The study of cognitive and/or emotional factors (e.g., self-regulation,
beliefs, self-attributes, perceived risks or benefit), that influence
vulnerability or resilience to drug abuse, is also of interest. To
address these questions, investigators may study responsivity to acute
drug challenge, including the examination of how physiological,
motivational or subjective responses to drugs of abuse are influenced
by cognitive and emotional variables (e.g., expectancy, affective
state, emotional context, etc.). Also appropriate would be studies
examining cognitive and emotional variables (e.g., coping, emotional
regulation, self-efficacy) in the context of treatment or preventive
interventions (e.g., role in adherence or compliance), including
studies on the influence of media and other forms of informational
messages. The study of decisions and other cognitive processes, and
their associated neural substrates, which give rise to sexual risk
behavior, is also an area of research interest. Studies on the
influence of physiological indicators of stress, stress perception or
stress reactivity (e.g., allosteric load) on drug abuse vulnerability
or clinical outcome, may be included in proposed investigations.
Studies in response to this RFA may be laboratory-based experiments
(i.e., with human substance abusing populations, or preclinical
models), or field based investigations in real world or clinical
settings.
MECHANISM OF SUPPORT
This RFA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Resource-
related Research Project Grant (R24) mechanism for Research
Infrastructure Awards. The R24 mechanism is used to support projects
that enhance the capabilities of resources to contribute to NIH
extramural research. As an applicant you will be solely responsible
for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project. This RFA
is a one-time solicitation. Currently, NIH does not have a plan for
re-issuing this within the next five years.
The total project period for an application submitted in response to
this RFA is up to five (5) years for R24 awards. The anticipated award
date is April 2004.
This RFA uses just-in-time concepts. Modifications to the standard
application instructions, which are provided under SUPPLEMENTAL
INSTRUCTIONS below, must be used.
Institutions applying for Research Infrastructure Awards (R24) may
request support in the following categories: (A) Research Support
Cores, (B) Developmental Infrastructure, (C) Research Projects, and (D)
Translation of Research Findings into Practice. Applicant institutions
are not expected to request support in all or even most of the
categories; rather, they should request types and levels of support that
best suit their needs and objectives. NIH expects that the requested
amount and allocation of infrastructure support will vary substantially.
The first three categories of infrastructure support are intended to
advance the scientific program of the applicant institution's research
unit. For these categories, applicant institutions must justify the
types and amounts of support requested in terms of: (1) the scope,
objectives, and current and potential impact of the institution's
research program; (2) the potential contribution of requested
infrastructure to advancing the research program; and (3) the cost-
effectiveness of the requested support. Applicant institutions are
expected to define guidelines for determining the eligibility of
researchers and research projects to access resources provided under
this program, and guidelines and procedures for allocating such
resources. No restrictions on access (e.g., by students, investigators
lacking research support, investigators in fields other than mind-body
and health research) are imposed under this announcement. However,
applicant institutions must demonstrate that their proposed guidelines
and procedures for controlling access to core resources are consistent
with the scientific objectives of their research program and the goals
of this RFA.
1. RESEARCH SUPPORT CORES provide shared resources that support the
institution's research program. Research Support Cores should be
designed to advance the central scientific objectives and themes of the
applicant institution's research program while providing essential,
cost-effective services to support on-going research activities. Cores
should be designed to facilitate and promote innovation in the science
conducted by program researchers in addition to responding to researcher
needs. Equipment and support services that are specific to (i.e.,
solely for) individual research projects or researchers are not
allowable, except in the context of research projects as described in
Section 3 below. Examples include:
o ADMINISTRATIVE CORE providing for coordination of research, editorial
services, and/or assistance with grant application development and
fiscal management of grants.
o COMPUTING CORE providing equipment and/or services supporting shared
computing needs.
o INFORMATION CORE providing support for retrieving information,
materials, and data commonly used in mind-body and health research.
o DESIGN, ANALYSIS, AND DATA SHARING CORES providing support for
methodological and statistical issues as well as the preparation and
implementation of data sharing among investigators within and outside of
the applicant institution.
2. DEVELOPMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE refers to activities that promote the
development of new research capabilities. Examples include:
o PILOT RESEARCH SUPPORT, providing funds for the development of new
research projects. Institutions proposing pilot grant programs must
develop guidelines and eligibility requirements appropriate to the goals
of this RFA, and procedures and policies for administration of the
program. Issues that may be addressed include (but need not be limited
to): (1) priorities for allocating funds (e.g., junior researchers,
specified areas of research, interdisciplinary work, etc.); (2)
procedures for reviewing applications; (3) requirements for leveraging
funds or preparing research proposals to continue or expand the research
project; (4) size of awards; (5) length of award periods; (6) number of
awards permitted to an individual researcher; (7) mentoring
arrangements; and (8) cost-sharing arrangements with the parent
institution.
o FACULTY DEVELOPMENT, providing for partial salary support or other
support for the recruitment of new faculty in scientific areas critical
to the development of innovative and/or interdisciplinary research
directions. Support for any one individual may not exceed three years
in duration.
o NEW SERVICES, fostering the development of new core services. For
example, applicant institutions may propose to hire consultants to
assist with the design of research data acquisition services, or conduct
pilot studies to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative modes of
core service delivery.
o RESEARCH AGENDA DEVELOPMENT, laying the groundwork for new
substantive work or foster new research collaborations through
workshops, conferences, seminar series, and visiting scholar programs.
3. RESEARCH PROJECTS proposed must be of R01 quality, must directly
address and advance the program's central scientific objectives and
themes, and should emphasize innovative, interdisciplinary, and/or
cross-cutting elements. Institutions are encouraged to consider R01 and
other research grant mechanisms for the support of research projects
that do not explicitly meet these criteria.
4. TRANSLATION OF RESEARCH FINDINGS INTO PRACTICE activities differ
from the first three categories of infrastructure support in that they
are not solely intended to advance the basic research program at the
applicant institution, but are directed instead at external audiences.
These audiences may include (but are not limited to) the broad community
of mind-body and health researchers or communities concerned with public
policy or health or social programs. The activities should facilitate
the use of scientific resources outside of the applicant institution as
well as the practical (e.g., policy or clinical) implementation of
research findings. Applicant institutions should address the time frame
during which the resource(s) or service(s) will be provided as well as
the short- and long-term plan for supporting them. This plan should
address, as applicable, expectations for NIH support, cost-sharing by
the institution and other sources of support, and plans for charging
users and for managing program income.
Illustrative examples of activities include: supporting and
disseminating databases of high relevance to mind-body and health
research; developing and disseminating multidisciplinary bibliographic
databases; providing general resources for sharing of methods,
instruments, technique, analytic tools, or data.
Illustrative examples of activities benefiting policy, program, or
clinical audiences include the development of tools for effectively
communicating mind-body and health research findings to relevant
audiences and innovative strategies for translating basic research
findings into programs designed to improve health and well-being.
Applicant institutions should present their plans for ensuring effective
dissemination of the resources, tools or services developed by the
activity.
Applicant institutions should justify public infrastructure activities
aimed at the scientific community by demonstrating: (1) that these
activities will significantly advance the field of mind-body and health
research; (2) that the proposed activity does not duplicate existing
resources or services; and (3) that the proposed activity is cost-
effective.
5. CONSORTIA
Applicant institutions may propose to cooperate with other institutions
in undertaking any of the above-mentioned infrastructure activities.
Cooperative activities may include the development of research
partnerships involving scientists in the applicant institution's program
and colleagues in other institutions, and/or joint ventures with other
institutions to provide research, developmental, or translational
research services. Proposed research partnerships must be justified in
terms of the scientific advances to be gained through collaborations
across institutions relative to those likely to emerge from within-
institution partnerships. Examples of allowable activities include
travel for project development and coordination and use of research
support core, pilot project, and research project funds. Applicant
institutions also may propose cooperative research support,
developmental, or translation-to-practice activities in which the
applicant and a similar unit in another institution participate in joint
funding and administration of a common service or resource. Examples
might include a shared library, data archive, technology (e.g., MRI), or
outreach effort. Partners in a cooperative venture need not be another
institution funded through this RFA. Applicant institutions must
clearly describe the rights and responsibilities of each proposed
partner in the funding, administration, and use of shared resources.
FUNDS AVAILABLE
The NIH intends to commit approximately six million dollars in total
costs [Direct plus Facilities and Administrative (F & A) costs] in FY
2004. The NIH anticipates making up to six awards. Although the
financial plans of the NIH provide support for this program, awards
pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the availability of funds and
the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
Because the nature and scope of the research proposed may vary, it is
anticipated that the size of each award will also vary. Applicant
institutions may request a project period of up to five years and a
budget for TOTAL costs (i.e., combined direct and indirect costs) of up
to $1,000,000 per year.
Applicant institutions are strongly encouraged to discuss budget
requests with program staff listed under INQUIRIES prior to submission.
ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS
You may submit (an) application(s) if your institution has any of the
following characteristics:
o For-profit or non-profit organizations
o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges,
hospitals, and laboratories
o Units of State and local governments
o Eligible agencies of the Federal government
o Domestic (foreign institutions are ineligible)
o Faith-based or community-based organizations.
To be eligible to apply, the institution must have at least five (5)
researchers with a history of research activity related to mind-body and
health research in both of the following categories: (1) externally
funded research grants or contracts in the past three years and (2) one
or more publications in peer-reviewed journals during the past three
years. The "past three years" refers to the 36-month period preceding
the application submission date for this RFA. "Externally funded" means
funding is received from sources outside the institution; it may include
peer-reviewed funding from NIH, NSF, other federal agencies, state and
local governments, and private foundations. Include only projects on
which the individual has served as Principal Investigator or had
substantial involvement, comparable to that indicated by identification
of an investigator as "key personnel" on an NIH-funded grant.
Institutions may not simultaneously submit applications in response to
this RFA and its companion RFA-OB-03-005.
Potential applicant institutions are strongly encouraged to contact
staff listed under INQUIRIES to discuss eligibility prior to submission
of an application.
INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO BECOME PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS
Individuals with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to
carry out the proposed research are invited to work with their
institution to develop an application for support. Individuals from
underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with
disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH programs.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Applicant institutions must already have in place or establish at the
time of an award a research center or other administrative unit
(referred to as the "research unit" or "unit") that serves as a focal
point for or coordinates mind-body and health research across the
institution. This unit must have a defined governance structure. The
Principal Investigator should be a scientist or science administrator
who can provide effective administrative and scientific leadership.
Because the "Mind-Body Interactions and Health: Research Infrastructure
Program" is expected to enhance the unit's competitiveness for NIH
funding, the institution and pertinent departments are expected to show
a strong commitment to the unit and to match the requested
infrastructure support at a level appropriate to the resources of the
institution and the scope of the proposed program activities. Such
commitment may be demonstrated by the provision of dedicated space,
faculty appointments in subject areas relevant to the goals of the
unit's research program, salary support for investigators or core staff,
dedicated equipment, or other financial support for the proposed
program. Applicant institutions are encouraged to consult with program
staff listed under INQUIRIES to discuss this requirement.
The research conducted at the unit should reflect scientific benefits
and cost-efficiencies resulting from cooperation and interaction among a
pool of scientists with shared interests in mind-body and health
research. Applicant institutions should have in place (or propose in
their applications) effective mechanisms for fostering the development
of an intellectual community that bridges investigators from different
disciplines and different projects and promotes innovation in mind-body
and health research.
Also see ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS (above) for minimum application
requirements. Note that these requirements take precedence over
requirements announced elsewhere (e.g., in the instructions for the
application kit PHS 398).
WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES
We encourage inquiries concerning this RFA and welcome the opportunity
to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into
three areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants
management issues:
o Direct inquiries regarding GENERAL ISSUES to:
Ronald P. Abeles, Ph.D.
Office of Behavioral and Social Research
Office of the Director
National Institutes of Health
Gateway Building, Room 2C234, MSC 9205
7201 Wisconsin Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20892-9205
Phone: 301-496-7859
E-mail: [email protected]
o Direct inquiries regarding research interests and topics of SPECIFIC
INSTITUTES AND CENTERS to:
FORGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER
Flora N. Katz, Ph.D.
Fogarty International Center
National Institutes of Health
31 Center Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892-2220
Phone: 301-402-9591
Fax: 301-402-0779
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Michael Stefanek, Ph.D.
Chief, Basic Biobehavioral Research Branch
Behavioral Research Program
Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences
National Cancer Institute
6130 Executive Boulevard/EPN 4066
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Phone: 301-496-8776
Fax: 301-435-7547
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTNERNATIVE MEDICINE
Nancy J. Pearson, Ph.D.
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
National Institutes of Health
6707 Democracy Blvd., Room 401
Bethesda, MD 20892
Phone: 301-594 0519
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE
Chyren Hunter, Ph.D.
National Eye Institute, NIH
6120 Executive Blvd., MSC 7164
Executive Plaza South, Suite 350
Bethesda, MD 20892-7164
Phone: 301-451-2020
Fax: 301-402-0528
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL HEART, LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE
Sarah Knox, Ph.D.
Behavioral Medicine Research Group
Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
6701 Rockledge Drive - MSC 7936
Bethesda, MD 20892-7936
Phone: 301-435-0409
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM
Thomas Gentry, Ph.D.
Office of Collaborative Research
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
6000 Executive Boulevard MSC 7003, Suite 302
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: 301-443-6009
Fax: 301-480-2358
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Christopher E. Taylor, ScD
Bacterial Diseases Program Officer
Respiratory Diseases Branch
Division of Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
NIAID
6700-B Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD, 20852-7630
Phone: 301-496-5305
Fax: 301-496-8030
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES
Deborah N. Ader, Ph.D.
Behavior and Prevention Research Program Director
One Democracy Plaza, Suite 800
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872
Telephone: (301) 594-5032
Fax: (301) 480-4543
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPOMENT
V. Jeffery Evans Ph.D., J.D.
Director of Intergenerational Research
Demographic and Behavioral Sciences Branch
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 8B07, MSC 7510
Bethesda, MD 20892-7510
Phone: 301-496-1176
Fax: 301-496-0962
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH
Patricia S. Bryant, Ph.D
Director, Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Program
Clinical, Epidemiology, and Behavioral Research Branch
Division of Population and Health Promotion Sciences
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
45 Center Drive, Rm 4AS.43A
Bethesda, MD 20892-6402
Phone: 301-594-2095
Fax: 301-480-8322
Email: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES
Frank A. Hamilton,M.D., MPH
Director, GI Motility Program
Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition
NIDDK
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Democracy 2
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5450
Phone: 301-594-8877
Fax: 301-480-8300
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH
Mary Ellen Oliveri, Ph.D.
Chief, Behavioral Science Research Branch
Division of Neuroscience and Basic Behavioral Science
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 7220, MSC 9651
Bethesda, MD 20892
Phone: 301-443-3942
Fax: 301-443-9876
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING
Richard Suzman, Ph.D.
Associate Director
Behavioral and Social Research (BSR)
Gateway Building, Suite 533
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, MSC 9205
Bethesda, MD 20892-9205
Phone: 301-496-3131
Fax: 301-402-0051
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE
Ro Nemeth-Coslett, PhD
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Division of Treatment Research and Development
Clinical Neurobiology Branch
NSC Rm 4234 MSC 9551
6001 Executive Blvd,
Bethesda, MD 20897
Phone: 301-402-1746
Fax: 301-443-6814
E-mail: [email protected]
o Direct your questions about PEER REVIEW ISSUES to:
Michael Micklin, Ph.D.
Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Rm. 3178 MSC 7848
Bethesda, MD 20814-9692
Phone: 301-435-1258
Fax: 301-480-3962
o Direct your questions about FINANCIAL OR GRANTS MANAGEMENT MATTERS
to:
FORGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER
Bruce Butrum
Fogarty International Center
National Institutes of Health
31 Center Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892-2220
Phone: 301-496-1670
Fax: 301-594-1211
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Crystal Wolfrey
Grants Administration Branch
National Cancer Institute
Executive Plaza South, Room 243
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Phone: 301-496-8634
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTNERNATIVE MEDICINE
Victoria Carper
Grants Management Officer
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
National Institutes of Health
6707 Democracy Blvd., Room 401
Bethesda, MD 20892
Phone: 301-594-9102
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE
William W. Darby
Grants Management Officer
National Eye Institute
Executive Plaza South, Suite 350
6120 Executive Blvd, MSC 7164
Bethesda, MD 20892
Phone: 301-451-2020
Fax: 301-496-9997
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL HEART, LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE
Tanya McCoy
Grants Operations Branch
Division of Extramural Affairs
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
6701 Rockledge Drive - MSC 7926
Bethesda, MD 20892-7926
Phone: 301-435-0171
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM
Judy Fox
Grants Management Branch
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Willco Building, Suite 505
6000 executive Blvd. (MSC-7003)
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: 301-443-2434
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lesia A. Norwood
Grants Management Officer
Grants Management Branch
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease
6700-B Rockledge Drive, Room 2117, MSC 7614
Phone: 301-402-7146
Fax: 301-480-3780
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES
Michael Morse
Deputy Grants Management Officer
One Democracy Plaza, Suite 800
6701 Democracy Blvd.
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872
Phone (301) 594-3506
Fax: (301) 480-5450
E-Mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPOMENT
Kathy Hancock
Grants Management Branch
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 8A17K, MSC 7510
Bethesda, MD 20892-7510
Phone: 301-496-5482
Fax: 301-480-4782
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH
Mary E. Daley
Chief Grants Management Officer
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
45 Center Dr MSC 6402
Bethesda, MD 20892-6402
Phone: 301-594-4808
Fax: 301-480-8303
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES
Mr. Donald Ellis
Grants Management Branch. NIDDK
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 743
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5450
Phone: 301-594-8849
Fax: 301-480-3504
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH
Diana S. Trunnell
Assistant Chief, Grants Management Branch
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6120, MSC 9605
Bethesda, MD 20892-9605
Phone: 301-443-2805
Fax: 301-443-6885
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING
Linda Whipp
Grants and Contracts Management Officer
National Institute on Aging
Gateway Building, Suite 2N212
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, MSC 9205
Bethesda, MD 20892-9205
Phone: 301-496-1472
Fax: 301-402-3672
E-mail: [email protected]
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE
Gary Fleming, J.D., M.A.
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Office of Planning and Resource Management
Grants Management Branch
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3131 MSC 9541
Bethesda, MD 20892
Phone: (301) 443-6710
Fax: (301) 594-6849
E-mail: [email protected]
LETTER OF INTENT
Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that
includes the following information:
o Descriptive title of the proposed research
o Name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator
o Names of other key personnel
o Participating institutions
o Number and title of this RFA
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does
not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information
that it contains allows NIH staff to estimate the potential review
workload and plan the review.
The letter of intent is to be sent by June 16, 2003. The letter of
intent should be sent to:
Ronald P. Abeles, Ph.D.
Office of Behavioral and Social Research
Office of the Director
National Institutes of Health
Gateway Building, Room 2C234, MSC 9205
7201 Wisconsin Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20892-9205
Phone: 301-496-7859
E-mail: [email protected]
SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION
Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant
application instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). The PHS 398 is
available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in
an interactive format. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo,
Telephone (301) 710-0267, Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS
In lieu of the preprinted Table of Contents outline on Form Page 3 of
PHS 398, a table of contents should be prepared listing all of the
major sections described below and paginated to enable reviewers to
find specific information readily. The Table of Contents should contain
the types of information suggested below in three sections: Section I
- General Information, Section II - Research Plan, and Section III -
Appendix. The following guidelines will provide directions and
descriptions for preparing each section. Major areas to be listed and
paginated in the Table of Contents appear in capital letters.
SECTION I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. FACE PAGE
Complete all items on the application face page. This is page 1; number
succeeding pages consecutively.
The RFA title (Mind-Body Interactions and Health: Research
Infrastructure Program) and number (OB-03-004) must be typed on line 2
of the face page and the YES box must be marked.
B. DESCRIPTION AND PERSONNEL
Abstract of Research Plan. On page 2, describe briefly the objectives
of the proposed infrastructure grant and the proposed infrastructure
components. The abstract must fit in the space provided.
List key scientific and technical personnel participating in the grant.
Use continuation pages as necessary, numbering consecutively.
C. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Prepare the Table of Contents as noted above. The major areas to be
listed are enumerated in these instructions.
D. BUDGET ESTIMATES
Prepare composite budget tables for the Infrastructure Grant as
requested below. Requested funds should not exceed $1,000,000 per year
in total costs (i.e., combined direct and indirect costs) and not more
than five years of requested support. Separate detailed budget tables
also are required for each component.
1. Composite Budget
Use Form Page 4, "DETAILED BUDGET FOR INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD," of the
PHS 398 to present the total budget for all requested support for the
first year. For each category, such as "PERSONNEL," "EQUIPMENT," etc.,
list the amount requested for each component.
If consortium arrangements have been made involving other institutions
or organizations, include total costs [direct plus Facilities and
Administrative (F & A) costs] associated with such third party
participation in the "CONSORTIUM/CONTRACTUAL COSTS" category. Costs for
purchased services should be itemized under "OTHER EXPENSES."
Use Form Page 5, "BUDGET FOR ENTIRE PROPOSED PROJECT PERIOD," to
prepare a budget, by category, that provides totals for each year of
requested support. Budget estimates must include travel costs for
attending an ANNUAL MEETING of project directors and key staff at the
NIH in Bethesda, Maryland. Budget at least for two persons to attend a
two-day meeting once per year.
2. Infrastructure Component Budgets
Use Form Page 4, "DETAILED BUDGET FOR INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD," to
present the total budget for each component for which support is
requested for the first year. For each category, such as "PERSONNEL,"
"EQUIPMENT," etc., list the amount requested for each component.
Use Form Page 5, "BUDGET FOR ENTIRE PROPOSED PROJECT PERIOD," to
prepare a budget, by category, that provides totals for each year of
requested support for each component.
Consortium Budgets (if applicable) should be presented as described in
Item 1 (Composite Budget). Total Direct and F & A Costs of sub-awardee
are to be shown under "CONSORTIUM/CONTRACTUAL COSTS" on individual
component budgets and a detailed consortium budget is to be inserted
following the appropriate core budget, using Form Pages 4 and 5.
3. Budget Justifications
Describe the specific functions of key scientific and technical
personnel, consultants, collaborators, and support staff. For all
years, explain and justify any unusual items such as major equipment or
alterations and renovations. For additional years of support requested,
justify any significant increases in any category over the first 12-
month budget period. Identify such significant increases with asterisks
against the appropriate amounts. If a recurring annual increase in
"PERSONNEL" or "OTHER EXPENSES" is anticipated, give the percentage.
However, current NIH practice limits this annual increase to three
percent.
E. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Biographical sketches are required for all key scientific and technical
personnel participating in the program.
1. Active Research Staff
List all key scientific personnel in the program. Beginning with the
Principal Investigator, and following in alphabetical order, submit
biographical sketches as described in the instructions for Form PHS
398. Do not exceed four pages for each person. Note that this
information is essential in demonstrating that the applicant
institution meets eligibility requirements for a R24 award. (See
ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS, above.)
2. Technical Staff
List all technical personnel involved in infrastructure components of
the application. In alphabetical order, submit biographical sketches as
described in the instructions for Form PHS 398. Do not exceed four
pages for each person.
F. SUMMARY TABLE OF RESEARCH SUPPORT
Applicants should present a summary table of the levels of
infrastructure and research support received by the unit, by source.
This table should show, for the applicant unit as a whole, the total
funds supporting research and infrastructure in the unit for the most
recent budget year available. Show sources of funds in major categories
(e.g., NIH P30, R03, or R01 grants, NSF, Foundations, parent
institution, etc.). This table should be presented in a format of the
example available at
http://obssr.od.nih.gov/RFA_PAs/MBFY04/Research_Support_Table.htm.
G. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
Complete the "RESOURCES" section on Form Page 8 for the overall unit.
Briefly describe the features of the institutional environment that are
or would be relevant to the effective implementation of the proposed
program. As appropriate, describe available resources, such as clinical
and laboratory facilities, participating and affiliated units, patient
populations, geographical distribution of space and personnel, and
consultative resources. Use continuation pages as needed.
SECTION II - RESEARCH PLAN
Include a detailed Table of Contents with pagination (numeric only) at
the beginning of Section II. Identify each section by title, and assign
each a capital letter (A, B, C, etc.) that reflects the order in which
they are presented in the application research plan.
Page limitations: The length of the sections devoted to the overall
description of the program, progress report, research activity, and
proposed infrastructure components must not exceed those specified
below. Applicants should be concise.
Assurances and Collaborative Agreements. Any arrangements for
collaborative and cooperative endeavors or subcontracting should be
highlighted in the appropriate section below. Letters of Intent to
Collaborate and Letters of Agreement from consultants should be
referenced here and included at the end of the appropriate component.
A. PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Summarize the central scientific objectives and themes of the unit.
Highlight significant, unique, and/or cross-cutting areas of research.
Describe the impact the unit has had on the field with reference to
major recent contributions by active researchers in the program, large-
scale projects that exhibit positive externalities in the field,
creation of interdisciplinary collaborations, training and mentoring of
new scientists, scientific leadership of program personnel, or
translational activities to improve clinical practice, public
intervention programs, and public policy formulation. Summarize the
vision of program researchers for the unit's future scientific advances
and contributions.
Describe the configuration and governance of the unit and provide an
organizational chart. Include information on administrative position of
the unit within the larger institution, the authority of the Director,
and the use of advisory or user committees. Outline the principles and
procedures the unit uses to determine membership in or affiliation with
the unit and to allocate resources and grant access to core services.
If the unit employs more than one category of membership or
affiliation, explain the privileges and responsibilities associated
with each. Describe how the NIH support would leverage and interact
with all other forms of support contributing to the research activities
of the program.
Describe strategies the unit employs for advancing the quality and
innovation of its mind-body and health research program over the short
and long run. Describe how the unit fosters the development of an
intellectual community that bridges investigators from different
disciplines and different projects and promotes innovation in mind-body
and health research. Describe how the unit develops and implements its
goals. Describe how the unit assures the development and success of
junior scientists.
Summarize the key features of the proposed infrastructure program and
explain how each element will advance the quality, productivity, and
innovation of the unit's research activities. For Public Infrastructure
activities, explain the value and significance of the activities.
Do not exceed 10 pages for this section.
B. PROGRESS REPORT
Applicants currently funded under the P50 Centers for Mind/Body
Interactions and Health program (RFA-OD-99-005) should prepare a
progress report as required in PHS 398.
Do not exceed five pages.
C. SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES AND THEMES
Describe the themes of the unit's research program and its central
scientific objectives for advancing research on these themes. For each
highlighted theme:
o Discuss the scientific and practical significance of the research
theme: how can advances in this area contribute to substantive
knowledge, scientific methods, or public well-being?
o Describe how current and recent research activity in the unit has
contributed to the theme: what scientific accomplishments have program
scientists achieved and how have they affected mind-body and health
research? Highlight activities that have produced significant
innovation and/or interdisciplinary collaboration.
o Explain the vision of program scientists for advancing research on
this theme. What are the important questions to be answered? What
challenges must scientists overcome to answer them? What specific
objectives will guide the work of program scientists in this area?
o Indicate the strategies that program scientists will adopt to meet
the challenges and objectives relating to this theme. How will the
proposed infrastructure components advance research in this area?
Do not exceed 15 pages for this section.
D. RESEARCH ACTIVITY OF PROGRAM SCIENTISTS
Briefly summarize the recent and current research activity of each
active program scientist with respect to each of the five points listed
below. Use one page per active researcher. Describe the Principal
Investigator's research activity first and that of all other
researchers subsequently in alphabetical order.
1. Summarize the most important scientific accomplishments of the
researcher during the 36 months prior to the receipt date for this RFA
(i.e., July 2000 to July 2003). Discuss these accomplishments with
respect to their significance, innovation, and actual or potential
impact on mind-body and health research.
2. Identify externally funded research projects in which the researcher
participated as key personnel during the 36 months prior to the receipt
date for this RFA, the amount, source, and period of funding, and the
role and time commitment of the individual on the project. Information
provided under F. SUMMARY TABLE OF RESEARCH SUPPORT may be referenced
as appropriate to avoid repetition.
3. Briefly summarize relevant working papers and future research plans
(e.g., pending and planned research grant applications).
4. Describe how the researcher contributes to the unit's research
program: how his or her expertise, disciplinary training, substantive
interests, technical skills help to advance the central scientific
objectives and themes of the unit. Identify recent, active, or planned
collaborations involving this researcher.
5. Describe how the researcher uses (or would use) the proposed
infrastructure cores or activities.
E. COMPONENT DESCRIPTIONS
Describe proposed components in the order listed below. If more than
one component is proposed under a given category, assign letters to
distinguish the components (e.g., 1.a; 2.c). For each component,
provide the name of the Director and describe procedures used to assure
cost-efficiency and high quality administrative and research
activities.
Do not exceed five pages in describing each component (core or
activity). If any component is described as a collaborative activity
(i.e., involving partnership with another institution), applicants may
use one additional page to describe how each partner will contribute
(e.g., in terms of administration, staffing, and other resources); how
each partner will benefit (e.g., in terms of access to services or
research productivity); and how decision-making will be shared.
1. Research Support Cores - Describe the objectives, administrative
organization (use organizational chart), staffing (including a Core
Director and any professional or technical personnel and their duties),
space and physical resources, current and projected services,
eligibility for and allocation of services, and cost-sharing
arrangements. Briefly describe current or planned research activities
that will utilize the core services.
Explain how the proposed research support cores will contribute to
advancing the central scientific objectives and themes of the research
program and how the activities will foster innovation in the program's
research. Describe strategies for assuring that research support
services effectively respond to and anticipate the evolving needs of
science conducted in the unit. Justify the core in terms of scientific
impact and cost-effectiveness. Explain what the proposed core services
will provide over and above research support that the applicant's
institution already provides and why they are essential to meet the
needs and goals of the research program.
2. Developmental Infrastructure - Describe the objectives and
administrative organization of each type of developmental
infrastructure. Describe the impact of the infrastructure on mind-body
and health research within the unit. In describing seed grant programs,
provide details on program procedures and policies, including review
procedures; priorities for allocating funds; requirements for
leveraging funds or preparing research proposals to extend or continue
the project; size of awards; length of award periods; number of awards
permitted to an individual researcher; mentorship arrangements; and
cost-sharing arrangements with the parent institution.
Faculty development may include salary and/or research support for new
faculty. Describe the probable use of faculty development funds and the
ways in which the plan will advance the unit's research objectives.
3. Research Projects - For each component research project, provide a
full description of the project following the format presented in Form
PHS 398. Begin the presentation of each component research project on a
separate page.
Indicate: Project Title, Principal Investigator, title, location,
other investigators, consultants, and collaborators, titles (associate
professor, postdoctoral fellow, student), and location.
Present an Abstract of Research Plan (use Form Page 2 of PHS 398).
Present the Research Project Plan (do not exceed 25 pages for Sections
A-D). Discuss the purpose and nature of the project and its relevance
to the program's signature theme(s). Address the following: Specific
Aims, Significance, Preliminary Studies and/or progress to date (for
competing continuations), if applicable. Discuss the Research Design
and Methods. For research involving human subjects, this section must
address the inclusion of women, minorities and their subgroups, and
children as research subjects, following relevant policy announcements.
(See REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS, below.) Discuss Human Subjects,
Vertebrate Animals, Consultants, Collaborative arrangements, including
pertinent letters of assurance and intent. Present a section on
Literature Cited.
4. Public Infrastructure - Describe the objective of each activity and
the target audience (e.g., mind-body and health researchers, program
managers, policy makers). Explain the significance of the activity.
Discuss the potential of the activity for advancing mind-body and
health research, stimulating innovative or interdisciplinary research,
and/or enhancing the effective dissemination and translation of
research findings. Describe the unique contribution of the activity
compared with other similar activities that may already exist. Describe
the administrative organization (use organizational chart), staffing,
space and physical resources and current or projected services and
activities. Describe the plan for disseminating the resources,
services, or products to the target audience. Justify the core in terms
of cost-effectiveness and describe short- and long-range plans for
supporting the activity.
USING THE RFA LABEL: The RFA label available in the PHS 398 (rev.
5/2001) application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page
of the application. Type the RFA number on the label. Failure to use
this label could result in delayed processing of the application such
that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. In
addition, the RFA title (Mind-Body Interactions and Health: Research
Infrastructure Program) and number (OB-03-004) must be typed on line 2
of the face page of the application form and the YES box must be
marked. The RFA label is also available at:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/label-bk.pdf.
SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH: Submit a signed, typewritten
original of the application, including the Checklist, and five signed,
photocopies, in one package to:
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD 20892-7710
Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)
APPLICATION PROCESSING: Applications must be received by July 16,
2003. If an application is received after that date, it will be
returned to the applicant without review.
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will not accept any application
in response to this RFA that is essentially the same as one currently
pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending
application. The CSR will not accept any application that is
essentially the same as one already reviewed. This does not preclude
the submission of substantial revisions of applications already
reviewed, but such applications must include an Introduction addressing
the previous critique.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the CSR
and responsiveness by the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences
Research (OBSSR). Incomplete and/or non-responsive applications will
be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
Applications that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be
evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer
review group convened by the CSR in accordance with the review criteria
stated below. As part of the initial merit review, all applications
will:
o Receive a written critique
o Undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the
highest scientific merit, generally the top half of the applications
under review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score
o Receive a second level review by the National Advisory Council or
Board of the NIH Institute or Center to which it is assigned.
REVIEW CRITERIA
The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of
health-related biological, behavioral, and social systems, improve the
control of disease, and enhance health. In the written comments,
reviewers will be asked to discuss the following aspects of each project
in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a
substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of the criteria
listed below will be addressed and considered in assigning the score for
a research project, weighting them as appropriate for each project. Note
that the project does not need to be strong in all categories to be
judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high
priority score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out
important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to
move a field forward.
(1) SIGNIFICANCE: Does your project address an important problem? If
the aims of your application are achieved, how do they advance
scientific knowledge? What will be the effect of these studies on the
concepts or methods that drive this field?
(2) APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and
analyses adequately developed, well integrated, and appropriate to the
aims of the project? Do you acknowledge potential problem areas and
consider alternative tactics?
(3) INNOVATION: Does your project employ novel concepts, approaches or
methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does your project
challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or
technologies?
(4) INVESTIGATOR: Are you appropriately trained and well suited to
carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to your
experience level as the principal investigator and to that of other
researchers (if any)?
(5) ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which your work
will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed
experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific
environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there
evidence of institutional support?
ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA: In addition to the above criteria, your
application will also be reviewed with respect to the following:
o PROTECTIONS: The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans,
animals, or the environment, to the extent they may be adversely
affected by the project proposed in the application.
o INCLUSION: The adequacy of plans to include subjects from both
genders, all racial and ethnic groups (and subgroups), and children as
appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Plans for the
recruitment and retention of subjects will also be evaluated. (See
Inclusion Criteria included in the section on Federal Citations, below)
o BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested
period of support in relation to the proposed research.
o OTHER REVIEW CRITERIA:
A. OVERALL PROGRAM
Two PRIMARY CRITERIA will be used to evaluate the overall scientific
merit of an application for a Research Infrastructure Award:
1) Quality of the research program and its impact on the field:
Reviewers will consider the significance, innovation, and quality of
current and recent contributions of program scientists. Have these
contributions produced new knowledge and/or new approaches to research
that have significantly expanded, improved or altered the content,
methods, and direction of mind-body and health research? In order to
create a level playing field for smaller and larger programs on this
criterion, reviewers will be asked to take size of the program into
account in assessing impact. In other words, while both larger and
smaller programs will be expected to demonstrate research activity of
high quality, programs with fewer researchers would not be expected to
demonstrate the same quantity of research productivity and program
impact as programs with a greater number of researchers.
2) The potential future contributions of the applicant program to mind-
body and health research: Reviewers will base their assessment of
potential on such factors as the current trajectory of research
productivity, innovation, and accomplishments; the significance of the
applicant institution's central scientific objectives and themes and the
plan for advancing them; the program's plan for encouraging synergy and
interaction among mind-body and health researchers; and the applicant
institution's success in contributing to the development of junior
investigators.
Applicant institutions proposing only Public Infrastructure activities
will be judged on the basis of the secondary criteria below and the
detailed review criteria listed below under "Public Infrastructure."
Three SECONDARY CRITERIA will also be used to assess the overall
scientific merit of applications:
1) Quality and potential impact of proposed infrastructure program:
Reviewers will examine the overall quality, scientific merit, and
innovation of the activities to be supported. Reviewers will consider
the likelihood, based on existing capabilities and proposed activities,
that the proposed program will enhance mind-body and health research,
promote new research directions, facilitate interactions across
disciplines and substantive areas of study, or advance theoretical or
technical approaches. For infrastructure components benefiting audiences
outside the mind-body and health research community, reviewers will
assess potential impact in terms of improving the accessibility of mind-
body and health research to significant audiences and enhancing the
appropriate application of research findings to activities that improve
health and well-being.
2) Research competence of key personnel: Reviewers will consider the
capability and scientific credentials of the Principal Investigator to
direct the program and maintain high standards of research
collaboration; the specific technical qualifications of core directors;
and the scientific accomplishments of all participating investigators.
3) Institutional commitment and environment: Reviewers will assess the
nature and level of resource commitment from the institution in which
the center is housed and any cooperating institutions, taking into
account the institutional context. Reviewers also will consider the
academic and physical environment as it bears on research opportunities,
space, equipment, and the potential for interaction with scientists from
various departments, institutions or disciplines.
B. INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT COMPONENTS:
Individual elements of the proposed infrastructure program will be
evaluated separately based on the criteria below.
1. Research Support Cores
o Potential or actual contribution of the proposed core to advancing
research within the applicant unit, by: enhancing the productivity of
the existing scientific program; fostering new scientific advances;
facilitating interactions across disciplines and substantive areas of
study; and/or advancing theoretical or technical approaches.
o Appropriateness to the size and characteristics of the applicant
institution's existing research program and the central scientific
objectives and themes of the program.
o Qualifications, experience, and commitment to the program of the
investigators responsible for the cores or activities and their ability
to devote the required time and effort to the program.
o Cost-effectiveness of services or activities and appropriateness of
cost-sharing arrangements with the institution, relevant departments,
and other external infrastructure support programs.
2. Developmental Infrastructure
o Potential of the proposed activity to advance research within the
applicant unit by stimulating innovation in mind-body and health
research and/or fostering the development of junior scientists.
o Appropriateness to the size and characteristics of the applicant
institution's existing research program and the central scientific
objectives and themes of the program.
o Qualifications, experience, and commitment to the program of the
investigators responsible for the activities and their ability to devote
the required time and effort to the program.
o Cost-effectiveness of services or activities and appropriateness of
cost-sharing arrangements with the institution, relevant departments,
and other external infrastructure support programs.
o For pilot research programs proposed under "Developmental
Infrastructure," the appropriateness and quality of procedures and
policies for administering the program, such as guidelines for reviewing
applications, priorities for allocating funds, requirements for
leveraging funds, and size and length of awards, and other program
guidelines.
3. Research Projects:
In addition to the standard criteria for R01-like research grant
applications, each proposed research project will be evaluated with
respect to:
The contribution of the project to advancing the unit's central
scientific objectives and themes and the extent to which it embodies
innovative, collaborative, and/or cross-cutting elements of the unit.
4. Public Infrastructure:
Public infrastructure components will be evaluated according to the
following criteria:
o For activities intended to benefit the research community, the value
and significance of the proposed activity for mind-body and health
researchers and its potential for promoting interdisciplinary and/or
innovative mind-body and health research.
o For activities directed to policy, program, or other audiences, the
significance of the proposed activity and its potential for improving
the accessibility of mind-body and health research to significant
audiences and enhancing the appropriate application of research findings
to activities that improve health and well-being.
o Appropriateness of the targeted audiences and the adequacy of the
plans for disseminating the proposed activities, resources, or services
to these audiences.
Cost-effectiveness of services or activities and appropriateness of the
short- and long-term plans for supporting them (including cost-sharing
arrangements).
o Qualifications, experience, and commitment to the program of the
investigators responsible for the cores or activities and their ability
to devote the required time and effort to the program.
Applications proposing to undertake any infrastructure activity in
cooperation with another institution will be evaluated for the value
added by the involvement of other institutions and the appropriateness
and adequacy of plans for the sharing of rights and responsibilities
among proposed partners with respect to the funding, administration, and
use of shared resources.
RECEIPT AND REVIEW SCHEDULE
Letter of Intent Receipt Date: June 16, 2003
Application Receipt Date: July 16, 2003
Peer Review Date: October/November 2003
Council Review: January/February 2004
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: April 2004
AWARD CRITERIA
Award criteria that will be used to make award decisions include:
o Scientific merit (as determined by peer review)
o Availability of funds
o Programmatic priorities.
REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS
INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH: It is the
policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their
sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research
projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided
indicating that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health
of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results
from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law
103-43).
All investigators proposing clinical research should read the AMENDMENT
"NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in
Clinical Research - Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide
for Grants and Contracts on October 9, 2001
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html); a
complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10
_2001.htm. The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition
of clinical research; updated racial and ethnic categories in
compliance with the new OMB standards; clarification of language
governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials consistent with the new
PHS Form 398; and updated roles and responsibilities of NIH staff and
the extramural community. The policy continues to require for all NIH-
defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) all applications or
proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans to
conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender
and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and b)
investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting
analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group
differences.
INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN
SUBJECTS
The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the
age of 21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted
or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical
reasons not to include them. This policy applies to all initial (Type
1) applications submitted for receipt dates after October 1, 1998.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should
read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as
participants in research involving human subjects that is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm
REQUIRED EDUCATION ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECT PARTICIPANTS
NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject
participants for all investigators submitting NIH proposals for
research involving human subjects. You will find this policy
announcement in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts Announcement,
dated June 5, 2000, at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
PUBLIC ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT:
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been
revised to provide public access to research data through the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1)
first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in part with
Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency
in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a
regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is important for
applicants to understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH has
provided guidance at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm.
Applicants may wish to place data collected under this RFA in a public
archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the
distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application
should include a description of the archiving plan in the study design
and include information about this in the budget justification section
of the application. In addition, applicants should think about how to
structure informed consent statements and other human subjects
procedures given the potential for wider use of data collected under
this award.
URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES:
All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained
within specified page limitations. Unless otherwise specified in an
NIH solicitation, Internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to
provide information necessary to the review because reviewers are under
no obligation to view the Internet sites. Furthermore, we caution
reviewers that their anonymity may be compromised when they directly
access an Internet site.
HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010:
The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a
PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This RFA is
related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may
obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at
http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS: This program is described in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.989 (FIC), 93.213 (NCCAM), 93.395
and 93.393 (NCI), 93.866, 93.867 (NEI), 93.837 (NHLBI), (NIA), 93.273
(NIAAA), 93.856 (NIAID), 93.846 (NIAMS), 93.279 (NIDA), 93.121 (NIDCR),
93.848 (NIDDK), and 93.242 (NIMH). This program is not subject to the
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or
Health Systems Agency review. Awards are made under authorization of
Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42
USC 241 and 284) and administered under NIH grants policies described
at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm and under Federal
Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.
The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-
free workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In
addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits
smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a
facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care,
health care, or early childhood development services are provided to
children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and
advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
|
|||
|
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health® |
||||||