EXPIRED
Participating Organization(s) |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) |
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) |
|
Funding Opportunity Title |
Mentored Career Development Award to Build Research Capacity in Global Mental Health (K01) |
Activity Code |
K01 Research Scientist Development Award - Research & Training |
Announcement Type |
New |
Related Notices |
|
Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number |
RFA-MH-14-120 |
Companion Funding Opportunity |
None |
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s) |
93.242 |
Funding Opportunity Purpose |
The purpose of the NIMH Mentored Career Development Award to Build Research Capacity in Global Mental Health is to provide support and "protected time" (three to five years) for an intensive, supervised career development experience that will facilitate the entry of early career investigators into the field of global mental health research and lead to research independence. The NIMH invites applications from advanced postdoctoral and/or recently appointed early research scientists (usually with a Ph.D., M.D., or equivalent degree and no more than six years of postdoctoral research experience at the time of application) in biomedical, behavioral, or clinical sciences who are pursuing global mental health research careers in areas supported by the NIMH. After the first year of the award, award recipients must spend at least four months per year in-country conducting research at research sites or institutions in World Bank defined low- or middle-income countries (LMICs). |
Posted Date |
June 18, 2013 |
Open Date (Earliest Submission Date) |
September 22, 2013 |
Letter of Intent Due Date(s) |
September 22, 2013 |
Application Due Date(s) |
(Extended to November 1, 2013 per NOT-OD-14-003), Originally October 22, 2013, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization. |
AIDS Application Due Date(s) |
Not Applicable |
Scientific Merit Review |
February/March 2014 |
Advisory Council Review |
|
Earliest Start Date |
July 2014 |
Expiration Date |
(Extended to November 2, 2013 per NOT-OD-14-003), Originally October 23, 2013 |
Due Dates for E.O. 12372 |
Not Applicable |
Required Application Instructions
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Part 1. Overview Information
Part 2. Full Text of the Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section II. Award Information
Section III. Eligibility Information
Section IV. Application and Submission
Information
Section V. Application Review Information
Section VI. Award Administration Information
Section VII. Agency Contacts
Section VIII. Other Information
The overall goal of the NIH Research Career Development program is to help ensure that a diverse pool of highly trained scientists is available in appropriate scientific disciplines to address the Nation's biomedical, behavioral, and clinical research needs. More information about Career programs may be found at the NIH Extramural Training Mechanisms website.
The objective of the NIH Mentored Career Development Award (K01) is to provide salary and research support for a sustained period of protected time (3-5 years) for intensive, supervised research career development under the guidance of an experienced mentor, or sponsor, in the biomedical, behavioral or clinical sciences leading to research independence. The expectation is that, through this sustained period of research career development and training, awardees will launch independent research careers and become competitive for new research project grant (e.g., R01) funding. After the first year of the award, award recipients must spend at least four months per year in-country conducting research at research sites or institutions in World Bank defined low- or middle-income countries (LMICs).
Persistent disparities in access to mental health care and inadequately distributed human resources for mental health contribute to unmet needs for mental health services in the United States. Similarly, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face special human resource challenges which exacerbate the mental health treatment gap. For example, the World Health Organization Africa Region has the fewest psychiatrists per capita with approximately four psychiatrists for every 10,000,000 people (WHO Mental Health Atlas, 2005). In 2011, NIMH published the Grand Challenges in Global Mental Health (GCGMH), a set of global priorities that, if addressed, can help to reduce the burden of mental disorders around the world. One assumption underlying the GCGMH is the necessity of global cooperation in mental health research to solve problems. In this context, global mental health research contains three elements: (1) the problem bears relevance to many countries (i.e., high-, middle- and low-income) and may be influenced by determinants or solutions that transcend national borders; (2) the research activities aim to reduce disease burden and increase health equity; and (3) the research activities utilize collaborative, interdisciplinary approaches. In this regard, global mental health research is necessary for generating, implementing, and disseminating knowledge in the United States as well as abroad. In concert with robust mental health services research efforts domestically, collaborative global research activities permit innovations developed in wealthy countries to be adapted for use in lower income settings, and innovations in poor countries to be applied in wealthy countries (e.g., Thara, John, & Rao (2008); Aggarwal (2012)). A new cadre of skilled investigators is needed to integrate the values of global cooperation for mental health research while developing rigorous methodological and study design skills.
For the purposes of this funding opportunity announcement (FOA), applications should focus on conditions and disorders of brain structure and function that affect cognition, social and emotional processing, and behavior and are leading causes of disease burden worldwide, estimated on the basis of disability adjusted life years (DALYs). For example, disorders of interest include, but are not limited to depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, but exclude conditions with vascular (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, dementia, epilepsy) or infectious etiology and alcohol and substance use disorders. The term "global" mental health encompasses mental health in any country of the world. A core focus in global mental health research is related to both reducing the overall burden of health conditions (i.e., effectiveness) and reducing, and, ultimately, eliminating health inequities within and between countries. In addition, the term "global" refers to global influences on health such as cross-national factors such as macroeconomic policies, adverse living conditions, or the socio-political landscape. The responsibility for improving global mental health transcends national borders, class, race, gender, ethnicity and culture; its promotion requires collective action based on global partnerships.
The NIMH invites K01 applications from advanced postdoctoral and/or newly independent research scientists (usually with a Ph.D., M.D., or equivalent degree and no more than six years of postdoctoral research experience at the time of application) in biomedical or behavioral sciences who are pursuing global mental health research careers in areas supported by the NIMH. Clinical training (i.e., internship, residency, and/or fellowship) is not considered a period of postdoctoral experience unless there is a research component of =50% effort in any year. The NIMH program will provide an intensive research training experience designed to enhance the participating scientist s ability to conduct global mental health research, particularly research that addresses disparities in access to mental health care in LMICs, care for chronic, noncommunicable diseases, and/or implementation science in LMIC contexts. These themes are consistent with goals C, E, and F of the GCGMH (i.e., improve treatments and expand access to care; build human resource capacity; and transform health system and policy responses) (Collins et al. 2011). This FOA aims to augment the education and training of the scientific workforce to meet the nation’s biomedical, behavioral, and clinical research needs in global mental health research, a priority research area for the NIMH.
Specifically, this FOA seeks to:
(1) attract early career researchers to global mental health research by supporting their mentored research experience in the U.S. and in low- and middle-income countries;
(2) advance the career trajectories of exceptional, early career U.S. researchers in global mental health research; and
(3) stimulate more effective translation of the results of research on global mental health into public health practice.
Research topics might include, but are not limited to:
Funding Instrument |
Grant: A support mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity. |
New The OER Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types. |
|
Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards |
The NIMH intends to commit approximately $750,000 in FY 2014 to fund between 4-5 awards in response to this FOA. |
Award Budget |
Award budgets are composed of salary and other program-related expenses, as described below. |
Award Project Period |
The total project period may not exceed 5 years. |
Salary |
NIMH will contribute up
to $90,000 plus fringe benefits per year toward the salary of the career
award recipient. |
Other Program-Related Expenses |
NIH will contribute up to $60,000 per year toward the
research development costs of the award recipient, which must be justified
and consistent with the stage of development of the candidate and the
proportion of time to be spent in research or career development activities. |
Indirect Costs |
Indirect Costs (also known as Facilities & Administrative [F&A] Costs) are reimbursed at 8% of modified total direct costs. |
NIH grant policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.
Higher Education Institutions
The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
For-Profit Organizations
Governments
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in
the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2010/nihgps_ch16.htm#_Toc271265275
Applicant organizations must complete the following registrations as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. Applicants must have a valid Dun and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number in order to begin each of the following registrations.
All Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) must also work with their institutional officials to register with the eRA Commons or ensure their existing eRA Commons account is affiliated with the eRA Commons account of the applicant organization.
All registrations must be completed by the application due date. Applicant organizations are strongly encouraged to start the registration process at least 6 weeks prior to the application due date.
Any candidate with the skills, knowledge, and resources
necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director/Principal
Investigator (PD/PI) is invited to work with his/her mentor(s) and organization
to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial
and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always
encouraged to apply for NIH support. Multiple PDs/PIs are not allowed.
By the time of award, the individual must be a citizen or a
non-citizen national of the United States or have been lawfully admitted for
permanent residence (i.e., possess a currently valid Permanent Resident Card
USCIS Form I-551, or other legal verification of such status).
Candidates for this award must have a research or health-professional doctoral degree or equivalent.
This funding opportunity may support individuals who propose to train in a new field.
The candidate must demonstrate that he/she is committed to developing an independent global mental health research career relevant to the mission of the NIMH. Candidates must clearly describe how the activities proposed in the application will enable them to progress to a research career as an independent scientist in global mental health.
Eligibility for the K01 is limited to individuals with no more than 6 years of postdoctoral research experience at the time of application. Clinical training (i.e., internship, residency, and/or fellowship) is not considered a period of postdoctoral experience unless there is a research component of =50% effort in any year. The NIMH will consider waiving this eligibility limitation on a case-by-case basis with strong justification. Potential applicants must contact the NIMH Scientific/Research Contact for this FOA with the rationale for the requested waiver at least seven weeks in advance of the receipt deadline so that Program Staff can respond before the receipt deadline. Waivers will not be granted after an application has been submitted. Candidates are strongly encouraged to contact the Program Contact for this FOA prior to preparing an application to discuss issues of eligibility, program relevance, and review the specific provisions of this award.
Former PDs/PIs on NIH research project (R01), program project (P01), center grants (P50), sub-projects of program project (P01), sub-projects of center grants (P50), research training grants (D43), resource grants (R24), research education grants (R25), other career development awards (K awards), or the equivalent are not eligible. Former PDs/PIs of an NIH Small Grant (R03), Exploratory/Developmental Grant (R21), Clinical Trial Planning Grant (R34), Dissertation Award (R36), or SBIR/STTR (R41, R42, R43, R44) remain eligible. PDs/PIs assigned to lead a research project as the PD/PI during the non-competing phase of a significant independent NIH research grant and who have not previously competed successfully as PD/PI are eligible. A candidate for the K01 may not concurrently apply for or have an award pending for any other NIH career development award. Individuals on institutional K awards (K12 or KL2) are not eligible.
This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
NIH will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed within the past thirty-seven months (as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement), except for submission:
Candidates may submit research project grant (RPG) applications concurrently with the K application. However, any concurrent RPG application may not duplicate the provisions of the career award application. K award recipients are encouraged to obtain funding from NIH or other Federal sources either as a PD/PI on a competing research grant award or cooperative agreement, or as project leader on a competing multi-project award as described in NOT-OD-08-065.
At the time of award, the candidate must have a full-time appointment at the academic institution that is the applicant institution. Candidates who have VA appointments may not consider part of the VA effort toward satisfying the full time requirement at the applicant institution. Candidates with VA appointments should contact the staff person in the relevant Institute or Center prior to preparing an application to discuss their eligibility. Under certain circumstances, an awardee may submit a written request to the awarding component requesting a reduction in minimum required percent effort, which will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Details on this policy are provided in NOT-OD-09-036. Candidates must be able to commit a minimum of 9 person months (75% of full-time professional effort) to conducting research and career development activities associated with this award.
Before submitting the application, the candidate must
identify a mentor(s) who will supervise the proposed career development and
research experience. The mentor(s) should be an active investigator in the area
of the proposed research, have a strong, well-established record of research,
and be committed both to the career development of the candidate and to the
direct supervision of the candidate’s research. The mentor(s) must document the
availability of sufficient research support and facilities for high-quality
research. The mentor, or a member of the mentoring team, should have a
successful track record of mentoring. Candidates are encouraged to identify
more than one mentor, i.e., a mentoring team, if this is deemed advantageous
for providing expert advice in all aspects of the research career development
program. In such cases, one individual must be identified as the principal
mentor who will coordinate the candidate’s research and training. The candidate
must work with the mentor(s) in preparing the application. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to identify both U.S. based mentors and mentors from low-
and middle-income countries. Applicants are strongly encouraged to identify no
more than 4 mentors.
After the first year of the award, award recipients must spend at least four months per year physically in-country conducting research at research sites or institutions in World Bank defined low- or middle-income countries (LMICs). Time planned to conduct research or participate in research activities in LMICs should be included in the application in a timeline for career development and research activities. This timeline must meet the minimum in-country time requirements described above.
Applicants must download the SF424 (R&R) application package associated with this funding opportunity using the Apply for Grant Electronically button in this FOA or following the directions provided at Grants.gov.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed in this funding opportunity announcement to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
For information on Application Submission and Receipt, visit Frequently Asked Questions Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
By the date listed in Part 1. Overview Information, prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
The letter of intent should be sent to:
LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D.
Office for Research on Disparities & Global Mental
Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 6219B, MSC 9659
Bethesda, MD 20892-9659
Telephone: (301) 443-2847
Email: lprice@mail.nih.gov
All page limitations described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
The forms package associated with this FOA includes all applicable components, required and optional. Please note that some components marked optional in the application package are required for submission of applications for this FOA. Follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide to ensure you complete all appropriate optional components.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Candidate Information
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Candidate s Background
Career Goals and Objectives
Describe a systematic career development plan that: (1) shows a logical progression from prior research and training experiences to the research and career development activities that will occur; (2) justifies the need for further career development to become an independent investigator; and (3) utilizes the relevant research and educational resources of U.S.-based and LMIC organizations.
Career Development/Training Activities During Award Period
Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed.
Statements of Support
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Statements by Mentor, Co-mentor(s), Consultants, Contributors
Environmental and Institutional Commitment to the Candidate
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Description of Institutional Environment
Institutional Commitment to the Candidate’s Research Career Development
Research Plan
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Instructions to the SF424 (R&R) for Preparing an Individual Research Career Development Award (CDA) Application ( K Series), must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Research Strategy
Appendix
Do not use the Appendix to circumvent page limits. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
Candidates must carefully follow the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including the time period for when letters of reference will be accepted (letters are due by the application due date as described in the Notice). Applications lacking the appropriate required reference letters will not be reviewed. This is a separate process from submitting an application electronically. Reference letters are submitted directly through the eRA Commons Submit Referee Information link and not through Grants.gov.
Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications
before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application
corrections that might be necessary for successful submission.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov, the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies. Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the
status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants
administration.
Applicants are
responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA
Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are
provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost
principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants
Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH
Grants Policy Statement.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the
instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the
application due date. Section III. Eligibility
Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for
more information on the electronic submission process, visit Applying
Electronically.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the SF424(R&R)
Application Package. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a
valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful
submission of an electronic application to NIH.
The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the
application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA
Commons and for the System for Award Management (SAM). Additional information
may be found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
See more
tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by NIMH. Applications that are incomplete and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
In order to expedite review, applicants are requested to notify the NIMH Referral Office by email at NIMHReferral@mail.nih.gov when the application has been submitted. Please include the FOA number and title, PD/PI name, and title of the application.
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in NOT-OD-10-115.
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. As part of the NIH mission, all applications submitted to the NIH in support of biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
Reviewers should provide their assessment of the likelihood for the candidate to maintain a strong research program, taking into consideration the criteria below in determining the overall impact score.
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact.
Candidate
Does the candidate have the potential to develop as an independent and productive global mental health researcher? Is the candidate’s academic, clinical (if applicable), and research record of high quality? Is there evidence of the candidate’s commitment to meeting the program objectives to become an independent investigator in global mental health research? Do the letters of reference from at least three well-established scientists address the above review criteria, and do they demonstrate evidence that the candidate has a high potential for becoming an independent global mental health researcher?
Career Development Plan/ Career Goals & Objectives/ Plan to Provide Mentoring
What is the likelihood that the plan will contribute substantially to the scientific development of the candidate leading to research independence? Are the candidate's prior training and research experience appropriate for this award? Are the content, scope, and duration of the career development plan appropriate when considered in the context of the candidate's prior training/research experience and the stated training and research objectives for achieving independence? Are there adequate plans for monitoring and evaluating the candidate’s research and career development progress? Is there a commitment to spend at least four months per year physically in-country conducting research and participating in research activities, after the first year of the award? Is there evidence that the award will enable the candidate to devote full time (at least the required minimum percentage of full-time professional effort) to research and related duties by release from teaching, administration, clinical work, and other responsibilities? Does the career development plan include training activities that will facilitate translation of research findings to other low-resource settings (in low-, middle-, or high-income countries)?
Research Plan
Are the proposed research question, design, and methodology of significant scientific and technical merit? Is the research plan relevant to the candidate’s research career objectives? Is the research plan appropriate to the stage of research development and as a vehicle for developing the research skills described in the career development plan? Does the research plan address an area of science that will significantly impact the field of global mental health? Do the research questions and planned approach require completion in an LMIC as opposed to a domestic setting? Does the research plan adequately describe how the study population, health system, health policy, or clinical context contributes to the innovations of the proposed science? Will the results of the research advance the science of mental health services research and/or implementation research in the global context? Do the methods (i.e., recruitment, protocol development, data analysis) take into account potential barriers that are unique to the international research activities? If applicable, are there adequate plans for data safety and monitoring of clinical trials?
Mentor(s), Co-Mentor(s), Consultant(s), Collaborator(s)
Are the mentor's research qualifications in the area of the proposed research appropriate? Do(es) the mentor(s) adequately address the candidate’s potential and his/her strengths and areas needing improvement? Is there adequate description of the quality and extent of the mentor’s proposed role in providing guidance and advice to the candidate? Is the mentor s description of the elements of the research career development activities, including formal course work, adequate? Is there evidence of the mentor s, consultant s, and collaborator’s previous experience in fostering the development of independent investigators? Is there evidence of previous research productivity and peer-reviewed support? Is active/pending support for the proposed research project appropriate and adequate? Are there adequate plans for monitoring and evaluating the career development awardee’s progress toward independence? Are the proposed collaborations with other active investigators and other opportunities for professional growth appropriate and of high quality? Is adequate information provided that clearly documents expertise in the proposed area(s) of consulting/collaboration? Do(es) the mentor(s) provide established expertise in global mental health generally, and specifically in the region/country of interest? Is there strong and appropriate mentorship/collaboration planned in the foreign country?
Environment & Institutional Commitment to the Candidate
Is there clear commitment of the sponsoring institution to ensure that the required minimum of the candidate’s effort will be devoted directly to the research described in the application? Is the institutional commitment to the career development of the candidate appropriately strong? Are the research facilities, resources and training opportunities in the U.S. and the foreign site adequate and appropriate? Is the environment for scientific and professional development of the candidate of high quality? Is there assurance that the institution intends the candidate to be an integral part of its research program? Is the proposed environment within the LMIC conducive to the candidate achieving the candidate's research goals? Are there strong letters of support from representatives of the U.S. and LMIC institutions?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Protections for Human Subjects
For research that involves human subjects but does
not involve one of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR
Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human
subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their
participation according to the following five review criteria: (1) risk to
subjects, (2) adequacy of protection against risks, (3) potential benefits to
the subjects and others, (4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and (5)
data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or
more of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the
committee will evaluate: (1) the justification for the exemption, (2) human
subjects involvement and characteristics, and (3) sources of materials. For
additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to
the Human
Subjects Protection and Inclusion Guidelines.
Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children
When the proposed project involves clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion of minorities and members of both genders, as well as the inclusion of children. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Human Subjects Protection and Inclusion Guidelines.
Vertebrate Animals
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following five points: (1) proposed use of the animals, and species, strains, ages, sex, and numbers to be used; (2) justifications for the use of animals and for the appropriateness of the species and numbers proposed; (3) adequacy of veterinary care; (4) procedures for limiting discomfort, distress, pain and injury to that which is unavoidable in the conduct of scientifically sound research including the use of analgesic, anesthetic, and tranquilizing drugs and/or comfortable restraining devices; and (5) methods of euthanasia and reason for selection if not consistent with the AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animal Section.
Biohazards
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
Resubmissions
Not Applicable
Renewals
Not Applicable
Revisions
Not Applicable
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research
Taking into account the circumstances of the candidate, including level of experience, the reviewers will address the following questions. Does the plan satisfactorily address the format of instruction, e.g., lectures, coursework, and/or real-time discussion groups? Do plans include a sufficiently broad selection of subject matter, such as conflict of interest, authorship, data management, human subjects and animal use, laboratory safety? Do the plans adequately describe the role of the sponsor/mentor or other faculty involvement in the candidate’s instruction? Does the plan meet the minimum requirements for RCR, i.e., eight contact hours of instruction every four years? Is training specific to international contexts? Does training address International Human Research Standards, Ethical Codes, and specific country guidelines? Plans and past record will be rated as acceptable or unacceptable, and the summary statement will provide the consensus of the review committee.
Select Agent Research
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including (1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, (2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, (3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and (4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Resource Sharing Plans
Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable: (1) Data Sharing Plan; (2) Sharing Model Organisms; and (3) Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
Budget and Period of Support
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research. Does the candidate justify the need for three to five years of mentored research experience in order to become an independent global mental health researcher?
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s), in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications:
Appeals for initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this FOA.
Applications will be assigned to NIMH. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this FOA. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Advisory Mental Health Council. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
After the peer review of the application is completed, the
PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique)
via the eRA
Commons.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH
Grants Policy Statement.
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH
will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as
described in the NIH
Grants Policy Statement.
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided
to the applicant organization for successful applications. The NoA signed by
the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via
email to the grantee’s business official.
Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions. Selection
of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any
costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These
costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs.
Any application awarded in response to this FOA will be subject to the DUNS, SAM
Registration, and Transparency Act requirements as noted on the Award
Conditions and Information for NIH Grants website.
All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities. More information is provided at Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants. More specifically, for K Awards, visit the Research Career Development ( K ) Awardees section of the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
When multiple years are involved, awardees will be required to submit the Non-Competing Continuation Grant Progress Report (PHS 2590 or RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The Additional Instructions for Preparing Continuation Career Development Award (CDA) Progress Reports, must be followed. The Mentor’s Report must include an annual evaluation statement of the candidate’s progress.
A final progress report, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act), includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later. All awardees of applicable NIH grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at www.fsrs.gov on all subawards over $25,000. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement.
In carrying out its stewardship of human resource-related programs, the NIH may request information essential to an assessment of the effectiveness of this program from databases and from participants themselves. Participants may be contacted after the completion of this award for periodic updates on various aspects of their employment history, publications, support from research grants or contracts, honors and awards, professional activities, and other information helpful in evaluating the impact of the program.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity
and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
Prior consultation with NIMH Staff is strongly encouraged.
Grants.gov
Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission, downloading or navigating forms)
Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726
Email: support@grants.gov
GrantsInfo (Questions regarding application instructions and
process, finding NIH grant resources)
Telephone: 301-710-0267
TTY 301-451-5936
Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov
eRA Commons Help Desk (Questions regarding eRA Commons
registration, tracking application status, post submission issues)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
TTY: 301-451-5939
Email: commons@od.nih.gov
LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Telephone: 301-443-2847
Email: lprice@mail.nih.gov
David Armstrong, Ph.D.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Telephone: 301-443-3534
Email: armstrda@mail.nih.gov
Tamara Kees
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Telephone: 301-443-8811
Email: tkees@mail.nih.gov
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
| ||||||
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health® |