National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Participation Added June 11, 2024 (NOT-AT-24-043)
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
U34 Planning Cooperative Agreement
See Notices of Special Interest associated with this funding opportunity
The purpose of this NOFO is to support the planning phase of the Model Continuums of Care Initiative (MCCI) to Advance Health Equity and End Health Disparities Among Women and Girls in Racial/Ethnic Minority Communities. MCCI is a multi-ICO dissemination and implementation science initiative to advance racial equity and end health disparities in racial/ethnic minority women and girls of reproductive age. Specifically, the Model Continuums of Care Initiative will apply the latest dissemination and implementation science approaches to significantly reduce the prevalence and impact of multi-morbidity among racial/ethnic minority women and girls of reproductive age at risk and living with mental health disorders, substance use disorders, chronic stress, cardiopulmonary diseases, common metabolic disorders (e.g., diabetes), cancer, and HIV/AIDS. This concept proposes a continuum of care approach that integrates preventive health services, primary care, behavioral health, integrative care, and cardiopulmonary and endocrine specialties to fully address health care needs in each of these domains, and to have maximum impact on the overall health and well-being of racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls. While MCCI is not a maternal health initiative, women and girls ages 15-44 yrs. are centered because it is during the early reproductive period, i.e., adolescence, that multimorbidity typically begins and rapidly progresses, setting the stage for multiple chronic debilitating conditions in later life. Special emphasis will be placed on using stakeholder partnerships, provider training, and infrastructure changes to improve access for subgroups of racial/ethnic minority women and girls who currently have the least access to high quality health care (e.g., racial/ethnic minority women and girls living in low resource settings). Applications that include a partnership between Research Centers in Minority Institutions and other institutions with extensive programs in women's health research are strongly encouraged.
This NOFO requires a Plan for Enhancing Diverse Perspectives (PEDP), which will be assessed as part of the scientific and technical peer review evaluation. Applications that fail to include a PEDP will be considered incomplete and will be withdrawn.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to read the NOFO instructions carefully and view the available PEDP guidance material.
30 days before due date
Application Due Dates | Review and Award Cycles | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New | Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) | AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed | Scientific Merit Review | Advisory Council Review | Earliest Start Date |
June 18, 2024 | June 18, 2024 | Not Applicable | October 2024 | January 2025 | February 2025 |
October 18, 2024 | October 18, 2024 | Not Applicable | February 2025 | May 2025 | June 2025 |
February 19, 2025 | February 19, 2025 | Not Applicable | June 2025 | October 2025 | October 2025 |
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
No late applications will be accepted for this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).
Not Applicable
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.
Purpose
The purpose of this NOFO is to support the planning phase of the Model Continuums of Care Initiative (MCCI) to Advance Health Equity and End Health Disparities Among Women and Girls in Racial/Ethnic Minority and Other Underserved Communities (MCCI). MCCI is a multi-ICO dissemination and implementation science initiative to advance health equity and end health disparities in racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age living in the United States, with special emphasis on those with intersecting identities that increase their risk for health disparities; i.e., NIH-designated populations with health disparities, defined as racial and ethnic minority groups (African Americans, Latinos/Hispanics, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders), people with lower socioeconomic status, underserved rural communities, sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups, and people with disabilities in the U.S. and its territories:
See https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/about/overview/.
Specifically, MCCI will apply the latest dissemination and implementation science approaches to significantly reduce the prevalence and impact of multi-morbidity among racial/ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age at risk and living with mental health disorders, substance use disorders, chronic stress, cardiopulmonary diseases, common metabolic disorders (e.g., obesity, diabetes), cancer, and HIV/AIDS. This concept proposes a continuum of care approach that integrates preventive health services, primary care, behavioral health, integrative care, and specialty care (e.g., cardiopulmonary, endocrine, cancer, and HIV/AIDS specialties) to fully address health care needs in each of these domains, and to have maximum impact on the overall health and well-being of racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls. Women and girls ages 15-44 yrs. are centered because it is during the early reproductive period, i.e., adolescence, that multimorbidity typically begins and rapidly progresses, setting the stage for multiple chronic debilitating conditions in later life. This focus contrasts with maternal health initiatives, specifically, in that it does not focus solely on the perinatal period but instead considers the overall health of women between adolescence and menopause. MCCI will enhance the efforts of initiatives specific to maternal health, as the health of individuals years well before initial pregnancy is critical to maternal health.
In addition to the groups highlighted above, priority populations for this research initiative include populations of women and girls who have a substance use disorder and/or serious mental illness or other mental health disorder associated with functional impairments, and women and girls with intellectual or developmental disorders and/or other disabilities. Girls in or transitioning from social service systems (e.g., foster care, group homes, etc.), girls involved in the juvenile justice system, and women involved with the criminal justice system are also a high priority.
In this trans-NIH, trans-HHS effort to improve the quality of health care available to racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age, special emphasis will be placed on using stakeholder partnerships, provider training, and infrastructure changes to improve access for subgroups of women who experience significant impediments to high quality health care. Applications that include a partnership between Research Centers in Minority Institutions and other institutions with extensive programs in women's health research are strongly encouraged.
Background and Vision
Rising rates of anxiety and depression among U.S. women and girls are acting as important drivers of sharp increases in harmful alcohol and substance use. Rates of alcohol-related emergency department visits have escalated rapidly over the past two decades, with the rate among women outpacing the rate among men in every age group. From 2019 to 2020 alcohol-related deaths increased by 27% for women and by 25% for men, continuing a trend in alcohol-related deaths that also has been observed for the past two decades. This has been associated with a 400% increase in overdose-related deaths among women of reproductive age (i.e., ages 15 – 44 yrs. as defined by the CDC) over the same time period. Furthermore, the opioid crisis has disproportionately affected women from racial and ethnic minority communities. There is a bidirectional, positive relationship between mental health conditions coupled with harmful substance use and increased risk for a range of physical conditions. For example, both major depressive disorder (MDD) and harmful use of substances, including alcohol, nicotine, and psychostimulants, independently increase the risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other cardiopulmonary diseases (CPD). Conversely, CVD increases the risk for MDD and cognitive impairment. People living with Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 or Type 2 (DM) are at greater risk for MDD, and there is mounting evidence that people living with MDD may be at greater risk for developing Type 2 diabetes. Alcohol and tobacco use increase cancer risk, and racial/ethnic minority women have higher rates of certain cancers and/or higher risk of dying from certain cancers. For example, despite having similar rates of breast cancer, Black/African-American women are more likely than White women to die of the disease. Key goals of MCCI include increasing awareness of the role of substance use in increasing cancer risk (e.g., the role of alcohol in increasing breast CA risk), implementing preventive interventions that reduce substance use-related risk, and advancing integrative care for mental health disorders and harmful substance use during cancer treatment.
The intersection of these disorders and processes may impact the health of women and girls across the lifespan, underscoring the need to prevent and treat multi-morbidity early in the life course, ideally prior to first pregnancy; i.e., early adolescence. Research has found multiple factors contributing to disparities in multi-morbidity among women and girls, such as variability in access to high quality healthcare, underlying chronic conditions, implicit bias, overt discrimination, and chronic stress. Among these factors, chronic stress is uniquely addressable using evidence-based, stress management methods that have been shown to reduce sympathetic overactivity, blood pressure, oxidative stress, and systemic inflammation, as well as improve sleep and glucose metabolism. Thus, integrating stress management techniques into the health care of racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls presents an opportunity to impact many aspects of mental and physical health and to prevent or reverse multiple inter-related chronic conditions.
This trans-NIH initiative will address gaps in the continuum of health care for racial and ethnic minority (REM) and other underserved women and girls by bringing evidence-based, integrative interventions for mental health and substance use disorders and common co-occurring physical conditions (e.g., hypertension, asthma obesity, diabetes, cancer, HIV/AIDS) to population scale across the entire continuum of women and girls health care and by optimizing coordination of care. Specifically, MCCI proposes a continuum of care approach that integrates preventive health services, primary care, behavioral health, integrative care, and specialty care (e.g., cardiopulmonary, endocrine, cancer, and HIV/AIDS specialties) to fully address health care needs in each of these domains, and to have maximum impact on the overall health and well-being of racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls. By accelerating the scale-up of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for common co-occurring conditions across multiple components of existing womens health care continuums at the same time, MCCI is expected to have a transformative impact on womens health care, significantly reducing longstanding inequities in the delivery of state-of-the-art prevention, diagnostic, and treatment services across racial and ethnic minority and other underserved communities.
MCCI is not a maternal health initiative. Instead, MCCI aims to redress longstanding health inequities affecting racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age, in recognition of their intrinsic dignity and value apart from their role as current or potential mothers. For individuals who wish to become pregnant, it aims to address their complex health and social needs prior to pregnancy and/or between pregnancies, consistent with data showing that the health trajectory of any single pregnancy is largely determined by conditions that exist prior to pregnancy. While the focus of MCCI is on strengthening the continuum of women and girls health care external to clinical maternal health care, strategies to improve linkages between maternal health care and other components of the health care continuum must be a critical element of the partnering communitys broader plan to develop a model continuum of care.
For the purposes of this RFA, a model continuum of care for racial and ethnic minority women and girls is defined as one that includes various community partners (e.g., primary care facilities, hospitals, specialized care centers, community-based organizations, faith-based organizations, community advisory groups, etc.) and that, at a minimum, optimizes access to state-of-the art, evidence-based preventive, clinical, and rehabilitative health maintenance interventions for women and girls across the full continuum of health care. These interventions should be culturally appropriate and congruent with the changing needs and preferences of women and girls living within a given community.
Research Approach
The overarching goals of MCCI are to: 1) strengthen state and community public health surveillance system infrastructure and capacity relevant to the health of REM and other underserved women and girls; 2) promote provider education/training in the implementation of EBPs to prevent/treat multimorbidity in REM and other underserved women and girls; 3) support the integration and coordination of primary healthcare, behavioral health systems, and community-based services to meet the health and social needs of racial/ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age; 4) accelerate the adoption and implementation of evidence-based screening and interventions for common comorbidities affecting REM and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age across the entire continuum of womens health care; and 5) leverage existing federal, state and local resources and collaborations for aligning community and clinical services centering REM and other underserved women and girls.
MCCI Planning Phase (U34): This U34 NOFO supports the Planning Phase of MCCI. During this phase, investigators will have 2 - 3 years to: 1) establish public-private scientific partnerships involving the public health leadership in selected communities and NIH and other Federal agencies; 2) identify and address facilitators of and barriers to the implementation of evidence-based mental health, substance use, cardiovascular, cardiometabolic, cancer, and HIV/AIDS interventions (EBIs) focused on racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women, girls, and families living in communities at high risk for health disparities; 3) complete an assessment of local community surveillance, prevention and treatment needs; 4) identify a set of empirically-informed implementation research goals; 5) identify and develop plans to address essential policy, personnel, data, and other resource needs; and 6) complete a pilot implementation research project.
Awarded U34s that achieve the above milestones established for the planning phase will be eligible to apply for one or more Cooperative Agreement mechanisms during the Implementation Phase, during which awarded grantees will have up to 5 years to: 1) conduct large scale implementation studies to accelerate the translation to community practice of EBIs to prevent and reduce multimorbidity in racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age; and 2) disseminate and share findings and lessons learned through a data coordination center.
Given that MCCI aims to increase the adoption of an integrated set of EBPs delivered across the entire continuum of womens health care, the Implementation Phase will involve conducting a suite of coordinated studies in multiple components of the health care continuum for women and girls, such as adolescent and adult prevention services; adolescent and adult primary care services; adolescent and adult mental and behavioral health services; adult cardiopulmonary care; adult endocrinology services; adult cancer care; adult HIV/AIDS services; and community-based wellness and health maintenance services. Research to determine which strategies and interventions can be implemented in non-clinical community-based settings (e.g., faith-based institutions, schools, community service centers) is strongly encouraged. In the Implementation Phase, up to 7 studies per continuum are envisioned.
Research Areas of Special Interest
Research topics of special interest to participating NIH Institutes include, but are not limited to:
1. Optimal strategies for assuring the sustainability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for the prevention and treatment of common, co-occurring conditions in REM and other underserved women and girls. Specifically, research that illuminates the health infrastructure necessary to assure sustainability of data-driven, evidence-based systems of care, including but not limited to:
a. Policy requirements (e.g., health care financing; data management)
b. Data collection, integration, and harmonization requirements
c. Community partnership requirements
d. Workforce development requirements
2. Current trends in the prevalence of mental health disorders, SUDs, cardiopulmonary, and metabolic disorders, cancer, and HIV/AIDS among REM and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age in selected high-risk communities.
3. Best approaches to leveraging health information technology tools (e.g., electronic health records) and data science approaches to improve community surveillance for mental health and SUDs, cardiopulmonary disease, metabolic disorders, cancer, HIV/AIDS, and other common co-occurring conditions.
4. Effective community-specific strategies for:
a. Preventing commonly occurring diseases in REM girls and women. Promoting adoption of evidence-based approaches to preventing mental health disorders, harmful substance use, and common, co-occurring somatic conditions among REM and other underserved women and girls in the partnering community and bringing them to population scale.
b. Improving rates and quality of screening for depression, anxiety, alcohol and other SUDs, cardiopulmonary and metabolic diseases, cancer, and HIV/AIDS. Specifically, research examining whether cardiopulmonary and metabolic disease screening and treatment can be effectively combined with mental health and substance use screening in clinical and non-clinical settings (e.g., community-based, school-based, mobile, etc.).
c. Promoting adoption of evidence-based brief interventions for harmful alcohol and other substance use.
d. Improving treatment engagement and retention for REM and other underserved women and girls with mental health and SUDs and common, co-occurring, somatic conditions. Research to improve treatment outcomes by providing targeted, evidence-based services for comorbid conditions with high prevalence among women and girls who use alcohol and other substances at harmful levels (e.g., comorbid psychiatric conditions, including posttraumatic stress disorder; trauma history; chronic stress; chronic pain) is an area of special interest.
5. Best approaches to implementing evidence-based telemedicine models and other EBIs (e.g., spiritually based interventions; mind/body approaches; complementary and integrative health care approaches, etc.) with potential to significantly reduce disparities in access to care.
6. Evidence-based implementation strategies for stepped care to increase reach, uptake, and implementation of integrative, evidence-based, stepped care for common co-occurring conditions in racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls (e.g., Practice Facilitation; Intervention Mapping).
7. Best approaches to health maintenance in racial and ethnic minority and other underserved community settings, both before onset and after stabilization of disease is achieved (e.g., community health workers, evidence-based stress management, digital health monitoring devices, health-focused artificial intelligence).
Model Continuum Description:
Beyond supporting research that will significantly increase access to state-of-the-art health care among racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age, MCCI seeks to catalyze broader efforts within partnering communities to develop optimized systems of care that can serve as regional models replicable by communities with similar demographic, cultural, and structural characteristics. Each model continuum will ideally be:
1) Sustainable. Strategies and interventions to be evaluated must be implementable beyond the anticipated period of involvement by the federal government. Given that the overarching goal of MCCI is to have a transformative and lasting impact on the quality of health care available to racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls, sustainability planning must begin as early as possible in the planning process and show evidence of substantial progress at the end of each reporting period.
2) Inclusive. Recruiting and outreach efforts to encourage women from minority and other underserved groups to consider participating in the program's organization, such as applying for open organizational leadership or advisory/oversight positions.
3) Trustworthy. Comprising personnel, programs and interventions that are and are perceived as respectful, safe, and affirming of personal autonomy. Model continuums develop, implement, and continuously evaluate and modify plans to destigmatize mental and behavioral health disorders.
4) Person-centered. Model continuums embrace care of the whole person, cura personalis, as a central value. Embracing the principle of providing care for the whole person includes acknowledging the importance of a woman or girls spiritual and religious beliefs and practices and including these in the care plan.
5) Wellness, prevention, and recovery-centered. While state-of-the-art care for acute disease is an integral part of any model continuum of care, maintenance of good health (i.e., preventing first episodes of disease and, when disease occurs, achieving and maintaining remission) will be the central organizing principle. Model continuums of care will employ evidence-based strategies to promote wellness and prevent disease, and to promote long-term recovery after acute illness.
6) Trauma-informed. Trauma-informed systems of care will, at a minimum, consistently provide staff training to: a) increase awareness of the widespread impact of trauma; b) enhance skills necessary to recognize the signs and symptoms of trauma in patients, families, and staff; c) promote integration of knowledge about trauma into organizational and clinical policies, procedures, and practices; and d) actively avoid re-traumatization by implementing universal trauma precautions. Adopting trauma-informed practices can facilitate women and girls experience of safety, and potentially improve treatment engagement, adherence, and health outcomes, as well as wellness.
7) Culturally Competent. A model continuum of care is cognizant and affirming of both the culture of individual women and girls and of the local community, and able to effectively deliver health care services that meet their social, cultural, linguistic, and health literacy needs. This requires continuous staff training on cultural competence and cross-cultural issues and developing policies that reduce administrative, linguistic, and health literacy barriers to care. A culturally competent health care system can help improve health outcomes and quality of care, and can contribute to the elimination of racial and ethnic health disparities.
8) Empowering of individual women and girls, their families, and the communities where they reside. A continuum of care that empowers women will, at a minimum, have a patient bill of rights developed and continuously reviewed and modified in collaboration with participating patients. This bill of rights seeks to give every woman and girl a right to care that is safe, respectful, and affirming of her autonomy (e.g., the right to choose among available treatment options for the ones that are a best fit with her lifestyle and life circumstances). The bill of rights is intended to reinforce the role of care providers as consultants, as opposed to authority figures with control over a woman or girls healthcare options or choices.
9) Guided by principles of care-integration, featuring evidence-based, integrative treatments for multiple chronic conditions and delivery of care by multidisciplinary teams. Integrating stress management techniques into the health care of women presents an opportunity to impact many aspects of mental and physical health and prevent or reverse multiple inter-related chronic conditions.
10) Well-coordinated and resourceful, with clear plans in place to help women successfully transition from one component of the care continuum to the next when necessary. A plan to strengthen linkages between the continuum of care for women who are not pregnant and maternal health services is a critically important component of the broader plan to develop a model continuum of care.
11) Community-partnered and collaborative. Partnerships with organizations that provide a wide range of social services and operate and oversee community infrastructure (e.g., hospitals; community-based health care provider organizations; churches; health policy agencies; public safety organizations; housing agencies; departments of transportation; nutrition support services; schools and education associations; family and other social service providers; Medicaid; community-based membership organizations are an essential feature of a model continuum of care that is able to provide care for the whole person (i.e., cura personalis).
12) Evidence-based, flexible, and responsive to real time data. To the greatest extent possible, the choice of prevention and treatment options is informed by empirical evidence, and cognizant of the fact that the evidence is constantly changing. Model continuums of care are flexible and responsive to changing epidemiological, environmental, health systems, and clinical outcome data.
NIAAA Interests
MCCI is a trans-NIH Initiative whereby partnering ICOs will support only those applications that are aligned with their ICO-specific mission and goals, as outlined in their respective Strategic Plans.
NIAAA will support meritorious applications proposing, as a primary theme, dissemination and implementation research on EBIs/strategies to prevent, intervene early, effectively treat, and support recovery from alcohol and co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders among racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls. While addressing alcohol and co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders among racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls will be the primary focus of successful applications, during the Implementation Phase of the Initiative (i.e., after the 3-year planning phase supported by this NOFO), we will strongly encourage the inclusion of research on integrative prevention, screening, treatment, and recovery support strategies targeting other health conditions that commonly co-occur in these populations, including but not limited to hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases; asthma; obesity; diabetes; cancer; and HIV/AIDS.
Study budgets should provide appropriate levels of funding for community partners commensurate with the roles and level of effort of the community partners in research design and implementation, if applicable.
Applicants are encouraged to discuss their specific aims with the NIAAA contact listed prior to submission.
NINR Interests
The National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) supports research to solve pressing health challenges and inform practice and policy - optimizing health and advancing health equity into the future. NINR discovers solutions to health challenges through the lenses of health equity, social determinants of health, population and community health, prevention and health promotion, and systems and models of care. Drawing on the strengths of nursings holistic, contextualized perspective, core values, and broad reach, NINR funds multilevel and cross-sectional research that examines the factors that impact health across the many settings in which nurses work, including homes, schools, workplaces, clinics, justice settings, and the community. Observational, intervention, and implementation research are of interest to NINR.
NIMHD Areas of Research Interest
The mission of the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) is to lead scientific research to improve minority health and reduce health disparities. NIMHD considers race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status as the two pillars of health disparities science. Thus, NIMHD prioritizes novel and innovative research that examines, addresses, and mitigates the underlying causes, pathways, risks, and inequities adversely impacting the health and well-being of women and girls, particularly among minority health populations (i.e., African Americans, Latinos/Hispanics, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders) and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. NIMHD also supports research at the intersection of such populations along with other NIH-designated populations experiencing health disparities, (i.e., underserved rural populations, sexual and gender minorities (SGM), and people with disabilities) within the U.S. and its territories. See https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/about/overview/.
While MCCI is an implementation and dissemination science initiative, NIMHD encourages studies that use multiple domains of influence (e.g., biological, behavioral, sociocultural, environmental, physical environment, health system) and multiple levels of influence (e.g., individual, interpersonal, family, peer group, community, societal) to understand and address health disparities. See the NIMHD Research Framework:
See https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/about/overview/research-framework/nimhd-framework.html).
To meet the intersectional aims of research, investigators are encouraged to collaborate with community leaders, community-based organizations, and other relevant stakeholders to support the study and incorporation of physical, social, behavioral, cultural, ethical, structural, environmental, historical and policy factors into research designs, implementation, and dissemination. Community partnerships (e.g., tribal leadership, academic, private, safety-net health systems, community organizations, public health departments, state and local governments, health care professionals, faith-based organizations, and school or childcare settings) are strongly encouraged. Applicants proposing community-based research, should document existing collaboration with or support from community organizations.
In addition to the Research Areas of Interest delineated above, examples of research topics of special interest to the NIMHD include:
Study budgets should provide appropriate levels of funding for community partners commensurate with the roles and level of effort of the community partners in research design and implementation, if applicable.
Applicants are encouraged to discuss their specific aims with the NIMHD contact listed prior to submission.
Research Scope Not Responsive to NOFO:
MCCI is a dissemination and implementation science initiative aimed at supporting Type 1, 2, and 3 Hybrid Implementation Trials (i.e., those that evaluate a combination of effectiveness and implementation outcomes or a combination of implementation and clinical outcomes) . Therefore, preclinical and efficacy studies will be considered non-responsive.
MCCI is not a maternal health initiative. Instead, MCCI aims to redress longstanding health inequities affecting racial and ethnic minority and other underserved women and girls of reproductive age, in recognition of their intrinsic dignity and value apart from their role as current or potential mothers. For individuals who wish to become pregnant, it aims to address their complex health and social needs prior to conception and/or between pregnancies, congruent with data showing that the health trajectory of any single pregnancy is largely determined by conditions that exist prior to pregnancy. While the focus of MCCI is on strengthening the continuum of women and girls health care external to clinical maternal health care, strategies to improve linkages between maternal health care and other components of the health care continuum must be a critical element of the partnering communitys broader plan to develop a model continuum of care.
Given this focus on non-pregnant women and girls, applications that propose to focus on populations during the pre-, peri-, and postpartum periods and/or on hypotheses related to maternal health will be deemed non-responsive. While not a maternal health initiative, MCCI is a women's and girls health initiative that, by using an ecological systems approach to strengthening the continuum of health care for women and girls of reproductive age, may potentially significantly improve maternal health and birth outcomes among women and girls most severely affected by health disparities.
Diversity Statement
Every facet of the United States scientific research enterprise—from basic laboratory research to clinical and translational research to policy formation–requires superior intellect, creativity and a wide range of skill sets and viewpoints. NIHs ability to help ensure that the nation remains a global leader in scientific discovery and innovation is dependent upon a pool of highly talented scientists from diverse backgrounds who will help to further NIH's mission.
Research shows that diverse teams working together and capitalizing on innovative ideas and distinct perspectives outperform homogenous teams. Scientists and trainees from diverse backgrounds and life experiences bring different perspectives, creativity, and individual enterprise to address complex scientific problems. There are many benefits that flow from a diverse NIH-supported scientific workforce, including: fostering scientific innovation, enhancing global competitiveness, contributing to robust learning environments, improving the quality of the research, advancing the likelihood that underserved or health disparity populations participate in, and benefit from health research, and enhancing public trust..(See: NOT-OD-20-031)
Plan for Enhancing Diverse Perspectives (PEDP)
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Investigators proposing NIH-defined clinical trials may refer to the Research Methods Resources website for information about developing statistical methods and study designs.
Cooperative Agreement: A financial assistance mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this NOFO.
The OER Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Required: Only accepting applications that propose clinical trial(s).
The following NIH components intend to commit the following amounts in FY 2024 :
NIAAA, $1.8 M; Up to 3 awards at up to $600K per award.
NINR, the number of awards is contingent upon the number of meritorious applications received and funds available.
NIMHD, the number of awards is contingent upon the number of meritorious applications received and funds available.
Applications are limited to $225,000 per year and $600,000 in direct costs over the 3-year project period.
The maximum project period is three years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Higher Education Institutions
The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
For-Profit Organizations
Local Governments
Federal Governments
Other
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are not allowed.
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from diverse backgrounds, including individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, individuals with disabilities, and women are always encouraged to apply for NIH support. See, Reminder: Notice of NIH's Encouragement of Applications Supporting Individuals from Underrepresented Ethnic and Racial Groups as well as Individuals with Disabilities, NOT-OD-22-019.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
2. Cost Sharing
This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
3. Additional Information on Eligibility
Number of Applications
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
1. Requesting an Application Package
The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
By the date listed in Part 1. Overview Information, prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
The letter of intent should be sent to:
Philippe Marmillot, Ph.D.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
Telephone: 301-443-2861
Email: [email protected]
Page Limitations
All page limitations described in the How to Apply – Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply – Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
SF424(R&R) Cover
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
Other Attachments:
Plan for Enhancing Diverse Perspectives (PEDP)
Examples of items that advance inclusivity in research and may be part of the PEDP can include, but are not limited to:
For further information on the Plan for Enhancing Diverse Perspectives (PEDP), please see https://braininitiative.nih.gov/vision/plan-enhancing-diverse-perspectives. Please note that the race, ethnicity, or sex of the PD(s)/PI(s), key personnel, participating researchers or trainees, or the student bodies of participating institutions will not be considered in the application review process or when making funding decisions.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
PEDP implementation costs
Applicants may include allowable costs associated with PEDP implementation (as outlined in the Grants Policy Statement section 7: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps/html5/section_7/7.1_general.htm).
R&R Subaward Budget
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
PHS 398 Research Plan
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Multiple PD/PI Leadership Plan
Without duplicating information in the biosketch(es), describe the following: (1) PD(s)/PI(s)' expertise, experience, and ability to organize, manage and implement the proposed dissemination and implementation study and meet timelines, (2) PD(s)/PI(s)' expertise in study coordination, data management and statistics, and (3) PD(s)/PI(s)' capacity and commitment to enroll subjects.
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
Other Plan(s): Note: Effective for due dates on or after January 25, 2023, the Data Management and Sharing Plan will be attached in the Other Plan(s) attachment in FORMS-H application forms packages.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered Yes to the question Are Human Subjects Involved? on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
Delayed Onset Study
Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
PHS Assignment Request Form
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM)
See Part 1. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
4. Submission Dates and Times
Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIHs electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
5. Intergovernmental Review (E.O. 12372)
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
6. Funding Restrictions
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
Awards issued under this NOFO will be incrementally funded awards for each budget period with a project period of up to 3 years. NIH will not issue any awards under this NOFO for a single budget period for multiple years.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organizations profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by NIAAA, NINR, and NIMHD . Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Applications must include annual milestones. Applications that fail to include annual milestones will be considered incomplete and will be withdrawn. Applications must include a PEDP submitted as Other Project Information as an attachment. Applications that fail to include a PEDP will be considered incomplete and will be withdrawn before review.
In order to expedite review, applicants are requested to notify the appropriate IC Referral Office by email at the address below when the application has been submitted. Please include the NOFO number and title, PD/PI name, and title of the application.
Post Submission Materials
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Any instructions provided here are in addition to the instructions in the policy.
1. Criteria
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
A proposed Clinical Trial application may include study design, methods, and intervention that are not by themselves innovative but address important questions or unmet needs. Additionally, the results of the clinical trial may indicate that further clinical development of the intervention is unwarranted or lead to new avenues of scientific investigation.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? Is the prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project rigorous? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?
Are the scientific rationale and need for a clinical trial to test the proposed hypothesis or intervention well supported by preliminary data, clinical and/or preclinical studies, or information in the literature or knowledge of biological mechanisms? For trials focusing on clinical or public health endpoints, is this clinical trial necessary for testing the safety, efficacy or effectiveness of an intervention that could lead to a change in clinical practice, community behaviors or health care policy? For trials focusing on mechanistic, behavioral, physiological, biochemical, or other biomedical endpoints, is this trial needed to advance scientific understanding?
To what extent do the efforts described in the Plan for Enhancing Diverse Perspectives further the significance of the project?
Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or those in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project?
With regard to the proposed leadership for the project, do the PD/PI(s) and key personnel have the expertise, experience, and ability to organize, manage and implement the proposed clinical trial and meet milestones and timelines? Do they have appropriate expertise in study coordination, data management and statistics? For a multicenter trial, is the organizational structure appropriate and does the application identify a core of potential center investigators and staffing for a coordinating center?
To what extent will the efforts described in the Plan for Enhancing Diverse Perspectives strengthen and enhance the expertise required for the project?
Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?
Does the design/research plan include innovative elements, as appropriate, that enhance its sensitivity, potential for information or potential to advance scientific knowledge or clinical practice?
To what extent will the efforts described in the Plan for Enhancing Diverse Perspectives meaningfully contribute to innovation?
Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Have the investigators included plans to address weaknesses in the rigor of prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project? Have the investigators presented strategies to ensure a robust and unbiased approach, as appropriate for the work proposed? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed? Have the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex, for studies in vertebrate animals or human subjects?
If the project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, are the plans to address 1) the protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion or exclusion of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults), justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?
Does the application adequately address the following, if applicable
Study Design
Is the study design justified and appropriate to address primary and secondary outcome variable(s)/endpoints that will be clear, informative and relevant to the hypothesis being tested? Is the scientific rationale/premise of the study based on previously well-designed preclinical and/or clinical research? Given the methods used to assign participants and deliver interventions, is the study design adequately powered to answer the research question(s), test the proposed hypothesis/hypotheses, and provide interpretable results? Is the trial appropriately designed to conduct the research efficiently? Are the study populations (size, gender, age, demographic group), proposed intervention arms/dose, and duration of the trial, appropriate and well justified?
Are potential ethical issues adequately addressed? Is the process for obtaining informed consent or assent appropriate? Is the eligible population available? Are the plans for recruitment outreach, enrollment, retention, handling dropouts, missed visits, and losses to follow-up appropriate to ensure robust data collection? Are the planned recruitment timelines feasible and is the plan to monitor accrual adequate? Has the need for randomization (or not), masking (if appropriate), controls, and inclusion/exclusion criteria been addressed? Are differences addressed, if applicable, in the intervention effect due to sex/gender and race/ethnicity?
Are the plans to standardize, assure quality of, and monitor adherence to, the trial protocol and data collection or distribution guidelines appropriate? Is there a plan to obtain required study agent(s)? Does the application propose to use existing available resources, as applicable?
Data Management and Statistical Analysis
Are planned analyses and statistical approach appropriate for the proposed study design and methods used to assign participants and deliver interventions? Are the procedures for data management and quality control of data adequate at clinical site(s) or at center laboratories, as applicable? Have the methods for standardization of procedures for data management to assess the effect of the intervention and quality control been addressed? Is there a plan to complete data analysis within the proposed period of the award?
Are the timeline and milestones associated with the Plan for Enhancing Diverse Perspectives well-developed and feasible?
Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?
If proposed, are the administrative, data coordinating, enrollment and laboratory/testing centers, appropriate for the trial proposed?
Does the application adequately address the capability and ability to conduct the trial at the proposed site(s) or centers? Are the plans to add or drop enrollment centers, as needed, appropriate?
If international site(s) is/are proposed, does the application adequately address the complexity of executing the clinical trial?
If multi-sites/centers, is there evidence of the ability of the individual site or center to: (1) enroll the proposed numbers; (2) adhere to the protocol; (3) collect and transmit data in an accurate and timely fashion; and, (4) operate within the proposed organizational structure?
To what extent will features of the environment described in the Plan for Enhancing Diverse Perspectives (e.g., collaborative arrangements, geographic diversity, institutional support) contribute to the success of the project?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Is the study timeline described in detail, taking into account start-up activities, the anticipated rate of enrollment, and planned follow-up assessment? Is the projected timeline feasible and well justified? Does the project incorporate efficiencies and utilize existing resources (e.g., CTSAs, practice-based research networks, electronic medical records, administrative database, or patient registries) to increase the efficiency of participant enrollment and data collection, as appropriate?
Are potential challenges and corresponding solutions discussed (e.g., strategies that can be implemented in the event of enrollment shortfalls)?
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults) to determine if it is justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following three points: (1) a complete description of all proposed procedures including the species, strains, ages, sex, and total numbers of animals to be used; (2) justifications that the species is appropriate for the proposed research and why the research goals cannot be accomplished using an alternative non-animal model; and (3) interventions including analgesia, anesthesia, sedation, palliative care, and humane endpoints that will be used to limit any unavoidable discomfort, distress, pain and injury in the conduct of scientifically valuable research. Methods of euthanasia and justification for selected methods, if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, is also required but is found in a separate section of the application. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals Section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
For Resubmissions, the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Reviewers will assess whether the project presents special opportunities for furthering research programs through the use of unusual talent, resources, populations, or environmental conditions that exist in other countries and either are not readily available in the United States or augment existing U.S. resources.
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Reviewers will comment on whether the Resource Sharing Plan(s) (e.g., Sharing Model Organisms) or the rationale for not sharing the resources, is reasonable.
For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, reviewers will comment on the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
2. Review and Selection Process
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by the appropriate IC {NIAAA; NINR; NIMHD} in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
Applications may undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the appropriate national Advisory Council or Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
1. Award Notices
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization for successful applications. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via email to the recipient's business official.
Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs.
Any application awarded in response to this NOFO will be subject to terms and conditions found on the Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants website. This includes any recent legislation and policy applicable to awards that is highlighted on this website.
Individual awards are based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, the NIH and are subject to the IC-specific terms and conditions identified in the NoA.
ClinicalTrials.gov: If an award provides for one or more clinical trials. By law (Title VIII, Section 801 of Public Law 110-85), the "responsible party" must register and submit results information for certain applicable clinical trials on the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System Information Website (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov). NIH expects registration and results reporting of all trials whether required under the law or not. For more information, see https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/reporting/index.htm
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that all protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
Data and Safety Monitoring Requirements: The NIH policy for data and safety monitoring requires oversight and monitoring of all NIH-conducted or -supported human biomedical and behavioral intervention studies (clinical trials) to ensure the safety of participants and the validity and integrity of the data. Further information concerning these requirements is found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/hs/data_safety.htm and in the application instructions (SF424 (R&R) and PHS 398).
Investigational New Drug or Investigational Device Exemption Requirements: Consistent with federal regulations, clinical research projects involving the use of investigational therapeutics, vaccines, or other medical interventions (including licensed products and devices for a purpose other than that for which they were licensed) in humans under a research protocol must be performed under a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational new drug (IND) or investigational device exemption (IDE).
All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Recipients, and Activities, including of note, but not limited to:
If a recipient is successful and receives a Notice of Award, in accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.
If a recipient receives an award, the recipient must follow all applicable nondiscrimination laws. The recipient agrees to this when registering in SAM.gov. The recipient must also submit an Assurance of Compliance (HHS-690). To learn more, see the HHS Office for Civil Rights website.
HHS recognizes that NIH research projects are often limited in scope for many reasons that are nondiscriminatory, such as the principal investigators scientific interest, funding limitations, recruitment requirements, and other considerations. Thus, criteria in research protocols that target or exclude certain populations are warranted where nondiscriminatory justifications establish that such criteria are appropriate with respect to the health or safety of the subjects, the scientific study design, or the purpose of the research. For additional guidance regarding how the provisions apply to NIH grant programs, please contact the Scientific/Research Contact that is identified in Section VII under Agency Contacts of this NOFO.
In accordance with the statutory provisions contained in Section 872 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417), NIH awards will be subject to the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) requirements. FAPIIS requires Federal award making officials to review and consider information about an applicant in the designated integrity and performance system (currently FAPIIS) prior to making an award. An applicant, at its option, may review information in the designated integrity and performance systems accessible through FAPIIS and comment on any information about itself that a Federal agency previously entered and is currently in FAPIIS. The Federal awarding agency will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgement about the applicants integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants as described in 2 CFR Part 200.206 Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants. This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) administrative guidelines, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grant administration regulations at 2 CFR Part 200, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the recipients is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the recipients for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the recipients and NIH as defined below.
The PD(s)/PI(s) will have the primary responsibility for:
NIH staff have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below:
A designated ICO Program Director(s), acting as a Project Scientist, will have substantial programmatic involvement, as described below.
Areas of Joint Responsibility include:
Dispute Resolution:
Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between recipients and NIH may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual recipient. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the recipient's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulation 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulation 45 CFR Part 16.
3. Data Management and Sharing
Consistent with the 2023 NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing, when data management and sharing is applicable to the award, recipients will be required to adhere to the Data Management and Sharing requirements as outlined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Upon the approval of a Data Management and Sharing Plan, it is required for recipients to implement the plan as described.
4. Reporting
When multiple years are involved, recipients will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awardees will provide updates at least annually on implementation of the PEDP
A final RPPR, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. NIH NOFOs outline intended research goals and objectives. Post award, NIH will review and measure performance based on the details and outcomes that are shared within the RPPR, as described at 2 CFR Part 200.301.
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 as amended (FFATA), includes a requirement for recipients of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later. All recipients of applicable NIH grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at www.fsrs.gov on all subawards over the threshold. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement.
In accordance with the regulatory requirements provided at 2 CFR Part 200.113 and Appendix XII to 2 CFR Part 200, recipients that have currently active Federal grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all Federal awarding agencies with a cumulative total value greater than $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of a Federal award, must report and maintain the currency of information reported in the System for Award Management (SAM) about civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings in connection with the award or performance of a Federal award that reached final disposition within the most recent five-year period. The recipient must also make semiannual disclosures regarding such proceedings. Proceedings information will be made publicly available in the designated integrity and performance system (currently FAPIIS). This is a statutory requirement under section 872 of Public Law 110-417, as amended (41 U.S.C. 2313). As required by section 3010 of Public Law 111-212, all information posted in the designated integrity and performance system on or after April 15, 2011, except past performance reviews required for Federal procurement contracts, will be publicly available. Full reporting requirements and procedures are found in Appendix XII to 2 CFR Part 200 – Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk (Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues)
Finding Help Online: https://www.era.nih.gov/need-help (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
General Grants Information (Questions regarding application instructions, application processes, and NIH grant resources)
Email: [email protected] (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-480-7075
Grants.gov Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and Workspace)
Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726
Email: [email protected]
Beda Jean-Francois, Ph.D.
National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health (NCCIH)
Phone: 202-313-2144
Email: [email protected]
Deidra Roach, M.D.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
Telephone: 301-443-5820
Email: [email protected]
Sung Sug (Sarah) Yoon, RN, PhD
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Telephone: 301-402-6959
Email: [email protected]
Sundania Jw Wonnum, PhD
NIMHD - NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES
Phone: 301-402-1366
E-mail: [email protected]
Yewande A Oladeinde, Ph.D.
NIMHD - NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES
Phone: 301-402-1366
E-mail: [email protected]
Ranga Srinivas, Ph.D.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
Telephone: 301-451-2067
Email: [email protected]
Weigun Li, Ph.D.
National Institute on Nursing Research (NINR)
Telephone: 301-594-5966
Email: [email protected]
Yujing Lui, Ph.D.
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Telephone: 301-827-7815
Email: [email protected]
Debbie Chen
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
Phone: 301-594-3788
Email: [email protected]
Judy Fox
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
Telephone: 301-443-4704
Email: [email protected]
Randi Freundlich
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Telephone: 301-594-5974
Email: [email protected]
Priscilla Grant, JD
NIMHD - NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES
Phone: 301-594-8412
E-mail: [email protected]
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.