Department of Health and Human Services

Part 1. Overview Information

Participating Organization(s)

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Components of Participating Organizations

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Funding Opportunity Title
Research Opportunities in Established Cancer Epidemiology Cohort Studies (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed)
Activity Code

U01 Research Project – Cooperative Agreements

Announcement Type
Reissue of PAR-22-162
Related Notices
  • April 4, 2024 - Overview of Grant Application and Review Changes for Due Dates on or after January 25, 2025. See Notice NOT-OD-24-084.
  • August 31, 2022- Implementation Changes for Genomic Data Sharing Plans Included with Applications Due on or after January 25, 2023. See Notice NOT-OD-22-198.
  • August 5, 2022- Implementation Details for the NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy. See Notice NOT-OD-22-189.
Funding Opportunity Number (FON)
PAR-25-275
Companion Funding Opportunity
None
Assistance Listing Number(s)
93.393
Funding Opportunity Purpose

Through this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), the National Cancer Institute (NCI) encourages grant applications to support research in established cancer epidemiology cohort studies, defined as studies that have achieved their initial planned recruitment goal. Applications must include hypothesis-based research using data from an established cohort study and are expected to include support for cohort maintenance, continued follow-up, and sharing of the existing resources in addition to addressing research questions across the cancer control continuum.

Funding Opportunity Goal(s)

The overall goals of this NOFO are to reduce cancer risk, incidence, morbidity, and mortality and enhance quality of life in cancer survivors through an orderly sequence from research on interventions and their impact in defined populations to the broad, systematic application of the research results through dissemination and diffusion strategies. 

Key Dates

Posted Date
November 19, 2024
Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)
January 28, 2025
Letter of Intent Due Date(s)

Not Applicable

Application Due Dates Review and Award Cycles
New Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed Scientific Merit Review Advisory Council Review Earliest Start Date
February 28, 2025 February 28, 2025 Not Applicable July 2025 October 2025 December 2025

All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization. 

Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.

Expiration Date
March 01, 2025
Due Dates for E.O. 12372

Not Applicable

Required Application Instructions

It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).

Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.

Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.

  1. Use the NIH ASSIST system to prepare, submit and track your application online.
  2. Use an institutional system-to-system (S2S) solution to prepare and submit your application to Grants.gov and eRA Commons to track your application. Check with your institutional officials regarding availability.

  3. Use Grants.gov Workspace to prepare and submit your application and eRA Commons to track your application.


  4. Table of Contents

Part 2. Full Text of Announcement

Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description

Purpose

Through this notice of funding opportunity (NOFO), the National Cancer Institute (NCI) encourages grant applications to support research in established cancer epidemiology cohort studies, defined as studies that have achieved their initial planned recruitment goal. Applications must include hypothesis-based research using data from an established cohort study and are expected to include support for cohort maintenance, continued follow-up, and sharing of the existing resources in addition to addressing research questions across the cancer control continuum.

Key Definitions for this NOFO

  • Cancer Epidemiology Cohorts (CECs) are observational studies in which groups of people with a set of characteristics or exposures are prospectively followed for the incidence of new cancers, cancer mortality, and/or cancer-related outcomes.
  • Established Cohort Studies, for the purposes of this NOFO, are those studies that have achieved their initial planned recruitment goal.

Background

Longitudinal prospective cohort studies have made major contributions to knowledge of environmental, behavioral, and genomic factors associated with cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality and provided clues to intervention strategies to prevent or mitigate the effects of cancer and its treatment. NCI has made significant investments into establishing and maintaining large-scale prospective Cancer Epidemiology Cohorts (CECs) with a variety of exposure data, considerable follow-up time, and cancer information. Opportunities to leverage existing cohort data are critical to maximizing the investment toward better understanding the determinants of cancer occurrence and outcomes. CEC studies have helped advance our understanding of cancer etiology and outcomes, provided crucial insight into key environmental, lifestyle, and genomic factors, and informed intervention strategies to prevent or mitigate the effects of cancer and its treatment.

Well-designed, population-based cohort studies can provide a foundational framework for cancer prevention and control. NCI recognizes that CECs are valuable resources, providing data and biospecimen collections from diverse populations, with great potential for innovative research into cancer risks and outcomes following cancer diagnosis. For example, cohort studies have enabled research linking sleep duration and breast cancer incidence, polygenic risk scores to predict disease, diet quality and blood nutrient values to cancer risk, ambient air pollution and cancer risk, and a host of other relationships across race, ethnicity, and sex. Biospecimens collected in cohorts may reveal additional insight into the etiology of disease and provide a useful complement to participant-reported data. Because CECs collect a broad array of information across many domains, research can proceed in many directions that leverage existing data. Research should be driven by specific research questions that are important, innovative, and enable appropriate use of the existing data with the greatest potential to advance our understanding of cancer etiology and outcomes with the goal to improve cancer control.

Scope and Research Objectives of this NOFO

This NOFO is intended to support research using data from established cancer epidemiology cohort studies, defined as studies that have achieved their initial planned recruitment goal. Successful applications will address important hypothesis-based research questions using existing cohort resources, robust data collection as needed, and appropriate analytical plans. Support for the cohort study must be related to the scientific research aims and will be evaluated based on the proposed scientific research questions and methods. Applications designed solely to support cohort infrastructure are not appropriate for this NOFO. Research questions that include understudied populations (e.g., race, ethnicity, SES, age, geography), less commonly studied cancer sites and exposures, and studies that directly inform interventions and guidelines are encouraged.

Non-responsive Applications

Applications that propose any of the following will not be reviewed, including:

  • Initiate new cohorts or propose new participant recruitment;
  • Applications designed solely to support cohort infrastructure;
  • Do not include hypothesis-based research in the specific aims that is based on data from an established longitudinal cohort study;
  • Do not focus on cancer-related endpoints and outcomes;
  • Have data and/or resource sharing plans that do not comply with NIH policy and follow the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability) principles; or
  • Are based on cohorts that are currently funded by PAR 20-294 (These applications are not eligible until after the expiration of their current grant).

NOTE: Applicants to this NOFO are strongly encouraged to listen to the pre-application webinar sponsored by the NCI (date to be published under separate cover) and contact NCI staff as soon as possible in the development of the application to discuss the details of their proposed study so that NCI staff can help the applicant understand whether the study is within the goals and mission of the Institute and is appropriate for this NOFO. A recording of the pre-application webinar will be available the Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program’s website.

See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.

Section II. Award Information

Funding Instrument

Cooperative Agreement: A financial assistance mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this NOFO.

Application Types Allowed
New
Resubmission

 

The OER Glossary and the How to Apply Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.

Clinical Trial?

Not Allowed: Only accepting applications that do not propose clinical trials.

Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards

The number of awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.

Award Budget

Application budgets are not limited but need to reflect the actual needs of the proposed project. 

Award Project Period

The maximum project period is 5 years.

NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.

Section III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants

Eligible Organizations

Higher Education Institutions

  • Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education
  • Private Institutions of Higher Education

The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:

  • Hispanic-serving Institutions
  • Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)
  • Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs)
  • Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions
  • Asian American Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institutions (AANAPISIs)

Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education

  • Nonprofits with 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education)
  • Nonprofits without 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education)

For-Profit Organizations

  • Small Businesses
  • For-Profit Organizations (Other than Small Businesses)

Local Governments

  • State Governments
  • County Governments
  • City or Township Governments
  • Special District Governments
  • Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Federally Recognized)
  • Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized).

Federal Governments

  • Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government
  • U.S. Territory or Possession

Other

  • Independent School Districts
  • Public Housing Authorities/Indian Housing Authorities
  • Native American Tribal Organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)
  • Faith-based or Community-based Organizations
  • Regional Organizations
  • Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations)
Foreign Organizations

Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are eligible to apply.

Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are eligible to apply.

Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.

Required Registrations

Applicant Organizations

Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply- Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information.

  • System for Award Management (SAM) – Applicants must complete and maintain an active registration, which requires renewal at least annually. The renewal process may require as much time as the initial registration. SAM registration includes the assignment of a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code for domestic organizations which have not already been assigned a CAGE Code.
    • NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code – Foreign organizations must obtain an NCAGE code (in lieu of a CAGE code) in order to register in SAM.
    • Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) - A UEI is issued as part of the SAM.gov registration process. The same UEI must be used for all registrations, as well as on the grant application.
  • eRA Commons - Once the unique organization identifier is established, organizations can register with eRA Commons in tandem with completing their Grants.gov registrations; all registrations must be in place by time of submission. eRA Commons requires organizations to identify at least one Signing Official (SO) and at least one Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) account in order to submit an application.
  • Grants.gov – Applicants must have an active SAM registration in order to complete the Grants.gov registration.

Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))

All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account.  PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.

Eligible Individuals (Program Director/Principal Investigator)

Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from diverse backgrounds, including underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, individuals with disabilities, and women are always encouraged to apply for NIH support. See, Reminder: Notice of NIH's Encouragement of Applications Supporting Individuals from Underrepresented Ethnic and Racial Groups as well as Individuals with Disabilities, NOT-OD-22-019 and Notice of NIH's Interest in Diversity, NOT-OD-20-031.

For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply-Application Guide.

2. Cost Sharing

This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.

3. Additional Information on Eligibility

Number of Applications

Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.

The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:

  • A new (A0) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of an overlapping new (A0) or resubmission (A1) application.
  • A resubmission (A1) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application.
  • An application that has substantial overlap with another application pending appeal of initial peer review (see NIH Grants Policy Statement 2.3.9.4 Similar, Essentially Identical, or Identical Applications).

Section IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Requesting an Application Package

The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.

2. Content and Form of Application Submission

It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

Page Limitations

All page limitations described in the How to Apply- Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.

Instructions for Application Submission

The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply- Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.

SF424(R&R) Cover

All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.

SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations

All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

SF424(R&R) Other Project Information

All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

SF424(R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile

All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

.

R&R or Modular Budget

All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

Any individual designated as a PD/PI must commit a minimum of 1.8 person-months effort per year to the project (MPIs must commit a minimum of 1.2 person-months per NCI policy). The PD/PI person-months effort cannot be reduced in later years of the award.

The budgeted effort of other personnel must be appropriate to the needs and objectives of the project.

Applications should budget for at least one key personnel to attend a meeting (e.g., NCI Cohort Consortium’s annual meeting) for each year of a grant period. Meetings will take place at an NIH location in Maryland, if possible, or via video conference.

R&R Subaward Budget

All instructions in the How to Apply-Application Guide must be followed.

PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement

All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

PHS 398 Research Plan

All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:

Specific Aims: All applicants must include specific aims that address hypothesis-based research questions using data from established cancer epidemiology cohort studies, defined as studies that have achieved their initial planned recruitment goal.

Research Strategy: Applicants must organize the Research Strategy to include the sub-section elements identified below. Applicants may include other sub-sections as needed but must include the information requested below.

Sub-section A. Background and Significance

Define, justify, and explain the rationale for the proposed research int this study population. Provide an overview of relevant scientific literature. Identify the novel scientific gap fulfilled by the proposed research using data from the established cohort.

Sub-section B. Preliminary Data

Summarize preliminary data that provide the underlying logic or rationale for pursuing the project in the manner proposed as well as data that demonstrates the ability to complete the scientific aims proposed. Summarize what is believed to be the major challenges and described alternative approaches that may need to be pursued.

Sub-section C. Cohort Overview

Overview: Overall description and summary purpose of the proposed cohort. Schematic representations of the overall structure and timeline of the cohort are encouraged, where appropriate.

  • Description of Study Population: The application must include table(s) with a detailed description of the study population, including age structure (at enrollment and current), vital status, and response rates of participants, with the percentage of gender and racial/ethnic subpopulations (as described in https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-089.html.), number and type of cancer outcomes, and available biospecimens.
  • Retention: Approaches and methods proposed for follow-up of participants, assessment of outcomes, plans for retention, and methods for quality control must be described.
  • Collection and Management of Biospecimens: Describe the protocols for collection, processing, storage, and quality control of biospecimens. Investigators will be expected to evaluate and document compliance with NCI’s Best Practices for Biospecimen Resources (http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/bestpractices) for collection, processing, and storage of biospecimens.
  • Case Ascertainment Assessment: Describe the planned activities related to case ascertainment. If cancer registries are used for ascertainment, the quality of the registry is expected to be of comparable status to the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries' (NAACCR’s) silver or gold certification (https://www.naaccr.org/Certification/CertificationLevels.aspx). If other methods of case ascertainment are used, describe quality control or adjudication procedures.

Sub-section D. Approach

Describe methods/approaches that will be used to accomplish proposed Specific Aims;

  • Describe the relevant epidemiological information/data available.
  • Describe measures and methods of collection for any proposed new data collection.
  • Describe the analytic plan, including calculations for sample size and power analyses for all aims as appropriate.

Sub-section E. Timelines

  • Provide detailed timelines that are aligned with completing the specific aims.

Letters of Support: Applicants must include letters of support from collaborating entities (e.g., collaborating scientists, community partners, community-based organizations, etc.).

    Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply- Application Guide.

    The following modifications also apply:

    • Regardless of the amount of direct costs requested for any one year, all applications are expected to include a data sharing plan with: 1) the extent and type of data that have been and will be shared, 2) the data repository to which the data will be submitted (repository must be publicly accessible or controlled access, use of NIH repositories is encouraged, but not required, seewww.nlm.nih.gov/NIHbmic/nih_data_sharing_repositories.html for a full listing of NIH repositories), and 3) the timeline for the data to be shared after each wave of data collection.
    • Applications must include hypothesis-based research using data from an established cohort study and are expected to include support for cohort maintenance, continued follow-up, and sharing of the existing resources in addition to addressing research questions across the cancer control continuum.
    • CECs are required to maintain a website that details the procedure for external investigators requesting and obtaining data; procedures and criteria for access must be compliant with NIH data sharing policies. A summary of the number of data requests, acceptances, and rejections should be provided in annual progress reports to NCI. Resource sharing plans should follow the FAIR principles and be fully compliant with NIH policies, including the NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (https://datascience.cancer.gov/data-sharing/genomic-data-sharing).

    Other Plan(s): 

    All instructions in the How to Apply-Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:

    • All applicants planning research (funded or conducted in whole or in part by NIH) that results in the generation of scientific data are required to comply with the instructions for the Data Management and Sharing Plan. All applications, regardless of the amount of direct costs requested for any one year, must address a Data Management and Sharing Plan.
    • A Data Management and Sharing Plan is not applicable for this NOFO.

    Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply- Application Guide.

    • No publications or other material, with the exception of blank questionnaires or blank surveys, may be included in the Appendix.

    PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information

    When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply- Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:

    If you answered “Yes” to the question “Are Human Subjects Involved?” on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.

    Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information

    All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

    Delayed Onset Study

    Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start).All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

    PHS Assignment Request Form

    All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.

    Foreign Organizations

    Foreign (non-U.S.) organizations must follow policies described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, and procedures for foreign organizations described throughout the How to Apply- Application Guide.

    3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM)

    See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov

    4. Submission Dates and Times

    Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.

    Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time.  If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.

    Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.

    Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply-Application Guide.

    5. Intergovernmental Review (E.O. 12372)

    This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.

    6. Funding Restrictions

    All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

    Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.

    Requests of $500,000 or more for direct costs in any year

    Applicants requesting $500,000 or more in direct costs in any year (excluding consortium F&A) must contact a Scientific/ Research Contact at least 8 weeks before submitting the application and follow the Policy on the Acceptance for Review of Unsolicited Applications that Request $500,000 or More in Direct Costs as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. For more information, please seehttps://epi.grants.cancer.gov/funding/large-grant-applications/.

    Furthermore, applicants requesting $700,000 or more in direct costs in any year will be required to participate in a pre-submission consultation meeting with Program Staff at least 12 weeks prior to receipt date to ensure the scope of the application is appropriate to basic maintenance for existing cohorts to serve as a resource for research according to NIH data sharing policies. Additional information, including contact information and materials required, is outlined onhttps://epi.grants.cancer.gov/funding/large-grant-applications/. Applicants should contact NCI early enough to ensure the meeting will occur at least 12 weeks prior to submission. Failure to comply will result in the application being deemed non-responsive to the intent of the PAR.

    7. Other Submission Requirements and Information

    Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.

    Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.

    For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.

    Important reminders:

    All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.

    The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply Application Guide.

    See more tips for avoiding common errors.

    Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by NCI. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.

     

    Mandatory Disclosure

    Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.

    Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at [email protected].

    Post Submission Materials

    Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy

    Section V. Application Review Information

    1. Criteria

    Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.

    For this particular announcement, note the following:

    This NOFO supports cancer research in established cancer epidemiology cohort studies, defined as studies that have achieved their initial planned recruitment goal. .

    Successful applications will address important hypothesis-based research questions with strong scientific approaches that use the existing cohort resources. Support for developing and maintaining the cohort study related to the scientific research aims, will be evaluated on the appropriateness of methods proposed and future application of the data collected.

    Overall Impact

    Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following scored review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed). An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact.

    Scored Review Criteria

    Reviewers will consider Factors 1, 2 and 3 in the determination of scientific merit, and in providing an overall impact score. In addition, Factors 1 and 2 will each receive a separate factor score. 

     

    Significance

    • Evaluate the importance of the proposed research in the context of current scientific challenges and opportunities, either for advancing knowledge within the field, or more broadly. Assess whether the application addresses an important gap in knowledge in the field, would solve a critical problem, or create a valuable conceptual or technical advance.
    • Evaluate the rationale for undertaking the study, the rigor of the scientific background for the work (e.g., prior literature and/or preliminary data) and whether the scientific background justifies the proposed study.

    Innovation

    • Evaluate the extent to which innovation influences the importance of undertaking the proposed research. Note that while technical or conceptual innovation can influence the importance of the proposed research, a project that is not applying novel concepts or approaches may be of critical importance for the field.
    • Evaluate whether the proposed work applies novel concepts, methods or technologies or uses existing concepts, methods, technologies in novel ways, to enhance the overall impact of the project.

    Specific to this NOFO

    • Evaluate if important scientific questions and/or gaps in knowledge related to cancer etiology and cancer-related outcomes will be addressed by data collected in this cohort.
    • Evaluate if the proposed project provides information about a novel exposure, understudied group of participants, or less common cancer site.
    • Evaluate if the cohort study uses state-of-the-art tools and technologies to maintain and manage the CEC.
    • Evaluate if the application has developed a process that supports broad sharing of cohort data and biological specimens.
     

    Approach

    • Evaluate the scientific quality of the proposed work. Evaluate the likelihood that compelling, reproducible findings will result (rigor) and assess whether the proposed studies can be done well and within the timeframes proposed (feasibility).

    Rigor:

    • Evaluate the potential to produce unbiased, reproducible, robust data.
    • Evaluate the rigor of experimental design and whether appropriate controls are in place.
    • Evaluate whether the sample size is sufficient and well-justified.
    • Assess the quality of the plans for analysis, interpretation, and reporting of results.
    • Evaluate whether the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex or age, in the design, analysis, and reporting.
    • For applications involving human subjects or vertebrate animals, also evaluate:
      • the rigor of the intervention or study manipulation (if applicable to the study design).
      • whether outcome variables are justified.
      • whether the results will be generalizable or, in the case of a rare disease/special group, relevant to the particular subgroup.
      • whether the sample is appropriate and sufficiently diverse to address the proposed question(s).
    • For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, assess the adequacy of inclusion plans as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Considerations of appropriateness may include disease/condition/behavior incidence, prevalence, or population burden, population representation, and/or current state of the science.

    Feasibility:

    • Evaluate whether the proposed approach is sound and achievable, including plans to address problems or new challenges that emerge in the work. For proposed studies in which feasibility may be less certain, evaluate whether the uncertainty is balanced by the potential for major advances.
    • For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, evaluate the adequacy and feasibility of the plan to recruit and retain an appropriately diverse population of participants. Additionally, evaluate the likelihood of successfully achieving the proposed enrollment based on age, racial, ethnic, and sex or gender categories.
    • For clinical trial applications, evaluate whether the study timeline and milestones are feasible.

    Specific to this NOFO

    • Evaluate if there are appropriate plans for the rigorous management and quality control of data and biospecimens collected by the CEC.
    • Evaluate how well does the study population approximate the relevant US population.
    • Evaluate if the CEC research objectives described feasible and likely to be completed during the requested period. 
    • Evaluate the strength of the retention plan, including assessing the adequacy of the follow-up rates and/or response rates.
    • Evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed types and number of outcome variables for the intended research scope.
    • Evaluate the availabilities of the cohort's materials/resources, current age of distribution, and vital status of participants in follow-up to support the proposed scientific aims.
     

    Investigator(s)

    Evaluate whether the investigator(s) have demonstrated background, training, and expertise, as appropriate for their career stage, to conduct the proposed work. For Multiple Principal Investigator (MPI) applications, assess the quality of the leadership plan to facilitate coordination and collaboration.

    Environment

    Evaluate whether the institutional resources are appropriate to ensure the successful execution of the proposed work.

    Additional Review Criteria

    As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, but will not give criterion scores for these items, and should consider them in providing an overall impact score.

     

    For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects; 2) adequacy of protection against risks; 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others; 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained; and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.

    For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption; 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics; and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.

     

    When the proposed research includes Vertebrate Animals, evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals according to the following criteria: (1) description of proposed procedures involving animals, including species, strains, ages, sex, and total number to be used; (2) justifications for the use of animals versus alternative models and for the appropriateness of the species proposed; (3) interventions to minimize discomfort, distress, pain and injury; and (4) justification for euthanasia method if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.

     

    When the proposed research includes Biohazards, evaluate whether specific materials or procedures that will be used are significantly hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and whether adequate protection is proposed.

     

    As applicable, evaluate the full application as now presented.

     

    As applicable, evaluate the progress made in the last funding period.

     

    As applicable, evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed expansion of the scope of the project.

    Additional Review Considerations

    As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.

     

    For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, evaluate the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.

     

    Evaluate whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.

    2. Review and Selection Process

    Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by NCI, in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.

    As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.

    Applications may undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.

    Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the appropriate national Advisory Council or Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:

    • Scientific and technical merit of the proposed project as determined by scientific peer review.
    • Availability of funds.
    • Relevance of the proposed project to program priorities.

    If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.

    Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicant’s federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicant’s integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 “Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants.” This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.

    3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates

    After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.

    Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.

    Section VI. Award Administration Information

    1. Award Notices

    A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipient’s business official.

    In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.

    Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk.  For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.

    Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.

    2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

    The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:

    All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.

    Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable federal regulations.  NIH may terminate awards under certain circumstances.  See 2 CFR Part 200.340 Termination and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.5.2 Remedies for Noncompliance or Enforcement Actions: Suspension, Termination, and Withholding of Support

    Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that:

    Where the award funding involves implementing, acquiring, or upgrading health IT for activities by any funded entity, recipients and subrecipient(s) are required to: Use health IT that meets standards and implementation specifications adopted in 45 CFR part 170, Subpart B, if such standards and implementation specifications can support the activity.  Visit https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-D/part-170/subpart-B to learn more.

    Where the award funding involves implementing, acquiring, or upgrading health IT for activities by eligible clinicians in ambulatory settings, or hospitals, eligible under Sections 4101, 4102, and 4201 of the HITECH Act, use health IT certified under the ONC Health IT Certification Program if certified technology can support the activity. Visit https://www.healthit.gov/topic/certification-ehrs/certification-health-it to learn more.

    Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, Div. N, § 405, Pub. Law 114-113, 6 USC § 1533(d), the HHS Secretary has established a common set of voluntary, consensus-based, and industry-led guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes.

    Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that:

    When recipients, subrecipients, or third-party entities have:

    1. ongoing and consistent access to HHS owned or operated information or operational technology systems; and 
    2. receive, maintain, transmit, store, access, exchange, process, or utilize personal identifiable information (PII) or personal health information (PHI) obtained from the awarding HHS agency for the purposes of executing the award.

    Recipients shall develop plans and procedures, modeled after the NIST Cybersecurity framework, to protect HHS systems and data. Please refer to NIH Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting for additional information. 

    Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award

    The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) administrative guidelines, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grant administration regulations at 2 CFR Part 200, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.

    The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the recipients is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the recipients for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the recipients and NIH as defined below.

    The PD(s)/PI(s) will have the following primary responsibilities:

    • Define the overall research objectives;
    • Determine approaches, design protocols, set project-specific objectives (e.g., milestones), and oversee the conduct of the research;
    • Ensure compliance with the applicable mandatory regulations (including protection of human subjects) as required by specific research activities;
    • Adhere to the NIH policies regarding intellectual property, data release, and other policies;
    • Cooperate with NCI programmatic, technical, and administrative staff;
    • Participate in the Cohorts Program Steering Committee;
    • Attend annual meetings, be held either virtually and/or in-person at the Bethesda, Maryland, area;
    • In addition to standard annual Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) submissions, PD(s)/PI(s) may be expected to supply additional progress-related information to the NCI.

    The PD(s)/PI(s) assume(s) responsibility and accountability to the applicant organization officials and to the NCI for the performance and proper conduct of the research supported by the U01 award in accordance with these terms and conditions of the award.

    Awardees are required to provide annual progress reports and descriptive data to NCI, including counts of participants (including current age, vital status, response rates and losses to follow-up or withdrawals) and a summary of data shared (including number of requests, approvals, denials, and list of collaborators) when appropriate.

    NCI program staff have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards. The substantially involved NCI program staff member(s), acting as Project Coordinator(s), will coordinate in a centralized fashion various activities of the recipients. Specific responsibilities of the NCI Project Scientist(s)/Coordinator(s) will include the following aspects:

    • Facilitate collaborations between the awardees and other NCI-sponsored programs, investigators, or organizations;
    • Assist with the coordination of efforts that may contribute to the projects goals and NCI’s priorities;
    • Advise awardees on compliance with NIH policies, such as NIH data sharing policies;
    • Attend the cohort’s steering committee/external advisory board meetings and/or other standing/ad hoc meetings as appropriate;
    • Organize and conduct annual meetings to discuss progress and longer-term projects or activities.
    • Provide input on methodological work or approaches, assist in designing protocols, and consult on updates to project progress;
    • Provide advice to the awardees on specific scientific and analytical issues;
    • Organize and participate in webinars with PDs/PIs to monitor progress and facilitate cooperation;
    • Monitor progress of the projects and adherence to the strategic goals of the program;
    • Track accrual of study participants to ensure proper completion of this essential step;
    • Provide administrative management to convening the Cohort Program Steering Committee, organize meetings, and monitor implementation of its guidelines and procedures;
    • Stimulate interactions among awardees; and
    • Contribute to publications and presentations resulting from the project if appropriate.

    Additionally, an NCI Program Director acting as Program Official will be responsible for the normal scientific and programmatic stewardship of the award and will be named in the award notice.

    Areas of Joint Responsibility include:

    The NCI Project Scientist and the PD/PI of the Cooperative Agreement awards funded under this initiative will be jointly responsible for participating in initiative-wide and cohort-related activities and for establishing inter-project collaborations with other awardees of cancer epidemiology cohorts. In addition to the interactions defined above, the NCI Project Scientist and awardees shall share responsibility for the following activities via a Cohort Program Steering Committee, which will serve as a non-voting organizational body for the NCI and awardees.

    The Program Steering Committee will consist of:

    • Principal investigator(s) of each award;
    • Two NCI Project Scientists (Cohort Co-Coordinators); and
    • One NCI Director assigned to the awarded grant.

    The Cohort Program Steering Committee will be organized and administratively managed by the NCI program staff and will meet for at least one annual meeting (either virtually or in-person)during the grant period where all awardees will discuss award-related and program-related issues, including but not limited to progress on proposed specific aims, data collection meaures, methodologic work, recruitment/retention goals, data sharing, data deposition, and community-engagement activities. Additional webinar meetings will also be organized by the NCI program staff throughout the award period as needed. At the meeting(s), awardees will work together under the guidance of NCI program staff as a consortium of investigators to advance the objectives and goals of this initiative.

    The NCI Project staff and awarded PIs will serve on the Steering Committee. In addition, other NCI Program Officials, may serve on the committee to help with issues regarding recruitment, follow-up, quality control, protocol adherence, assessment of problems affecting the study and potential changes in the protocol, interim data and safety monitoring, final data analysis and interpretation, preparation of publications, and development of solutions to major problems such as insufficient participant enrollment. The Steering Committee may establish working groups/sub-committees as needed, e.g., to address specific scientific or administrative issues.

    Dispute Resolution:

    Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between recipients and NIH may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual recipient. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the recipient's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulation 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulation 45 CFR Part 16.

    3. Data Management and Sharing

    Consistent with the 2023 NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing, when data management and sharing is applicable to the award, recipients will be required to adhere to the Data Management and Sharing requirements as outlined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Upon the approval of a Data Management and Sharing Plan, it is required for recipients to implement the plan as described.

    4. Reporting

    When multiple years are involved, recipients will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.4.1 Reporting. To learn more about post-award monitoring and reporting, see the NIH Grants & Funding website, see Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting.

    A final RPPR, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.6 Closeout. NIH NOFOs outline intended research goals and objectives. Post award, NIH will review and measure performance based on the details and outcomes that are shared within the RPPR, as described at 2 CFR Part 200.301.

    Section VII. Agency Contacts

    We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.

    Application Submission Contacts

    eRA Service Desk (Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues)

    Finding Help Online: https://www.era.nih.gov/need-help (preferred method of contact)
    Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)

    General Grants Information (Questions regarding application instructions, application processes, and NIH grant resources)
    Email: [email protected] (preferred method of contact)
    Telephone: 301-480-7075

    Grants.gov Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and Workspace)
    Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726
    Email: [email protected]

    Scientific/Research Contact(s)

    Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Telephone: 240-276-6914
    Email: [email protected]

    Peer Review Contact(s)

    Referral Officer
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Telephone: 240-276-6390
    Email: [email protected]

    Financial/Grants Management Contact(s)

    Dawn M. Mitchum, MPH, CRA
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Telephone: 240-276-5699
    Email:[email protected]

    Section VIII. Other Information

    Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

    Authority and Regulations

    Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.

    NIH Office of Extramural Research Logo
    Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Home Page
    Department of Health
    and Human Services (HHS)
    USA.gov - Government Made Easy
    NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health®