National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Administrative Supplements to NCI Grant and Cooperative Agreement Awards to Support Collaborations with the Drug Resistance and Sensitivity Network (DRSN)(Admin Supp Clinical Trial Not Allowed)
Additional funds may be awarded as supplements to parent awards using the following Activity Code(s):
Administrative supplement requests must be submitted on paper for the following activity codes:
UM2 Program Project or Center with Complex Structure Cooperative Agreement
Administrative supplement requests may be submitted electronically for the following activity codes:
UM1 Multi-Component Research Project Cooperative Agreements
This administrative supplement funding opportunity announcement (FOA) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is part of the Cancer Moonshot initiative to accelerate cancer research, and was developed in response to a recommendation from the Blue Ribbon Panel of experts charged with advising the National Cancer Advisory Board on exceptional scientific opportunities that could be accelerated through this initiative. As part of the Cancer Moonshot initiative, the NCI created the Drug Resistance and Sensitivity Network (DRSN), a collaborative network of centers of excellence (supported by U54 cooperative agreement awards) focused on using advanced techniques and models to accelerate understanding of issues of cancer resistance or extreme sensitivity to anticancer agents. The DRSN was also developed to assist in issues of cancer drug resistance in the development of NCI investigational new drug (IND) agents (i.e., those that the NCI is developing in collaboration with pharmaceutical industry partners) in NCI-sponsored early phase clinical trials. This FOA supports supplemental funds to current NCI-funded research projects for new interdisciplinary collaborations between non-U54 investigators and DRSN U54-supported investigators to perform research within the scientific scope(s) of the parent grant and/or cooperative agreement award(s) that will lead to improved pre-clinical evaluations of novel discoveries in cancer drug resistance that could ultimately be tested in NCI-sponsored clinical trials.
April 11, 2018
April 15, 2018
June 30, 2018, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
August 1, 2018
July 1, 2018
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Application Guide (SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, eRA Commons Administrative Supplement User Guide or PHS 398 Application Guide, as appropriate) except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.
Part 1. Overview Information
Part 2. Full Text of the Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section II. Award Information
Section III. Eligibility Information
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
Section V. Application Review Information
Section VI. Award Administration Information
Section VII. Agency Contacts
Section VIII. Other Information
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) established a blue ribbon panel to assist the National Cancer Advisory Board by providing expert advice on the vision, proposed scientific goals, and
implementation of the Cancer Moonshot initiative. To meet the goals of the Cancer Moonshot Blue Ribbon Panel and to advance the concept of cancer precision medicine, a collaborative network of centers of excellence focused on studies of cancer drug resistance and sensitivity was formed to accelerate the development of innovative strategies to understand and circumvent mechanisms of tumor resistance to therapy or to exploit unique cancer vulnerabilities to chemotherapy. The Drug Resistance and Sensitivity Network (DRSN) is a collaborative network of centers of excellence supported by U54 cooperative agreement awards that are providing a critical preclinical component to NCI's clinical drug development. Research results generated from the DRSN have translational potential to assist the development of novel therapeutic strategies in clinical settings. More simply stated, the DRSN, which is part of the Cancer Moonshot initiative, is aimed towards accelerating cancer research and making more therapies available to patients.
The leaders of the DRSN will be advising NCI staff on issues of cancer drug resistance that will inform the development of NCI-IND investigational agents (i.e., agents NCI is developing in collaboration with pharmaceutical partners) in NCI-sponsored early phase clinical trials. Because DRSN investigators have valuable models and specialized expertise not usually accessible to most investigators, NCI wants to make the resources of these centers available to other investigators performing research in cancer drug resistance to develop their discoveries in this field.
The research project proposed in the administrative supplement should align with the overarching goal of the DRSN, which is to develop pre-clinical data to support novel concepts in cancer drug resistance that have a feasible path for clinical validation. Furthermore, each administrative supplement request must propose a collaborative project that is within the scope of work already peer reviewed and approved in the eligible parent awards.
Understanding and utilizing the underlying principles of cancer drug resistance and sensitivity can assist the development of DNA damaging and novel targeted anticancer therapeutics by anticipating which tumors may be dependent on specific growth and survival pathways, and by devising rational approaches or drug combinations to circumvent the development of adaptive drug resistance in malignant cells. Recent studies have identified complex adaptive feedback networks leading to reactivation of pathways inhibited by targeted anticancer drugs, as well as causing constraints on the cell death responses to those agents. Detailed mechanistic studies of drug resistance can identify common signaling nodes upon which multiple resistance mechanisms converge. Resistance to the immune system in trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors is a fast-growing area in the study of drug resistance which requires further detailed mapping to gain understanding of means to avoid such responses. Broader studies of the cancer microenvironment have demonstrated that inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and immune cells play a critical role in cancer survival after systemic therapy.
As more targeted agents become available, and as more refined tumor subtypes are defined in preclinical models and human tumor biospecimens, drug resistance studies can be performed with much greater precision and may be more predictive of benefit in clinical settings. Well-characterized patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), for example, may assist in determining the relationships between molecular characteristics or signatures of tumors and therapeutic response. PDX studies could potentially identify tumor characteristics that are associated with beneficial response to investigational anticancer drug regimens. To exploit the information available from such advanced tumor biospecimen-derived models, recent developments in tumor genomic profiling, comprehensive analyses in gene expression, and the development of genetic techniques to study cancer drug resistance by precise perturbation of particular genes or pathways have been crucially important. The analysis of huge amounts of data generated by these techniques to prioritize candidate drug resistance targets has only been made possible by the development of computational biology centers at institutions conducting such research.
As part of the Cancer Moonshot initiative, NCI created the DRSN, a network of centers of excellence that utilizes sophisticated techniques, models, and human-derived biospecimens to study cancer drug resistance on a large scale to address the challenges of overcoming clinical cancer drug resistance. The DRSN was formed in 2017, with five Drug Resistance and Sensitivity Centers (DRSCs)(U54) being funded in response to a Request for Applications (RFA-CA-17-009). The primary goal of the DRSN is to conduct systematic analysis of cancer drug resistance in a number of important tumor types and with many targeted tumor pathways. The DRSN centers use genomic profiling to identify genetic alterations that drive sensitivity and resistance to cancer drugs, and other computational methodologies to prioritize for functional validation among the many alterations in gene expression seen with the development of resistance. Investigators at the funded DRSCs have expertise in powerful technologies such as deep, droplet-based, single-cell RNA-seq analysis or CRISPR/Cas screens on parental and drug-resistant cancer models, which may not be available to many investigators with funded studies in cancer drug resistance. DRSN investigators also have expertise in advanced models of cancer drug resistance, such as organoid cancer models, wherein the tumor biopsies are cultured as both tumor epithelium and their endogenous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) en bloc as a cohesive unit. All of these capabilities make potential collaboration with DRSN investigators a very useful resource for non-DRSN cancer researchers who need assistance with conducting systematic studies of their discoveries in cancer drug resistance.
A secondary goal of the DRSN is to build cancer drug resistance resources that can be accessed by non-network investigators for rigorous evaluation and development of drug resistance discoveries through competitive administrative supplement awards as described below. Therefore, the goal of this solicitation is to provide eligible investigators the opportunity to use DRSN resources to advance therapeutic concepts within the scope of projects that have already been peer reviewed in applications and funded as grants and cooperative agreements. It is expected that these additional mechanistic studies might increase the likelihood that the results could feasibly lead to clinical validation of the concept to identify and circumvent cancer drug resistance in patients.
It is anticipated that the awarded funds will be used to support drug resistance research at the applicant’s institution, based on a novel discovery found during the course of the applicant's ongoing funded research under the parent award. It is expected that the institutions awarded these funds will provide the necessary administrative and information technology (IT) support structure to collaborate with the DRSN. These will be 1-year supplements to eligible NCI-funded grant and cooperative agreement awards only. Administrative supplement awardees may request a 1-year no-cost extension. However, the project and budget periods of any administrative supplement request must be within the currently approved project period for the existing parent award. Additional administrative supplement funds will separately be made available to one or more of the five DRSCs in the DRSN to cover the DRSC costs associated with the collaboration.
This request for administrative supplements supports NCI’s efforts to enhance the development of advanced models and technologies in cancer drug resistance to be used as tools for precision medicine that will guide research in issues of cancer drug sensitivity and resistance. Requests may include collaborative studies to advance discoveries or phenomena noted in cancer drug resistance studies by non-DRSN investigators. Applicants may request assistance from investigators at a particular DRSC, based on common studies of tumor histology, resistance pathways or mechanisms, or access to specific advanced drug resistance technology or models at that DRSC. A request for collaboration or assistance in performing analysis of large data sets in drug resistance studies, using computational data center expertise at the DRSC would also be within the scope of this supplement.
Scope of Support
The funding mechanism being used to support this program, i.e., administrative supplements, can be used to cover cost increases that are associated with achieving certain augmented/enhanced research objectives as long as they are within the original scope of the project and are related to using technology and models to further pre-clinical development of studies in cancer drug resistance. Any cost increases need to result from making modifications to the project in order to take advantage of opportunities that would increase the value of the project consistent with its originally approved objectives and purposes.
The research proposed under the administrative supplement program must be within the original scope of the parent award. Applicants should propose research that, if successful, would lead to identification of sensitivity to anticancer agents for use in future novel clinical trials, or to identification of resistance mechanisms that might be circumvented in such clinical situations. The following types of applications are considered to fall within the scope of this program:
The administrative supplement is intended to promote
collaborations between DRSN investigators and non-DRSN investigators. Therefore,
the applicant(s) should both commit to a collaborative effort with DRSN
investigators in the proposed studies and expect that the proposed research
plan of an approved administrative supplement could be adjusted based on input
from the DRSN investigators. It is anticipated that preclinical studies using
the DRSC’s technology or models would be performed at the DRSC, and that data
and relevant specimens, based on the applicant’s proposed research study, would
be sent to the awardee. Information regarding the research plans, drug
resistance technique and models that are available at the existing (five) DRSCs
can be found at https://nciphub.org/groups/drsn.
The scope of proposed projects of the research plan should fit within budget constraints of both the supplement award to the applicant and the separate supplement award to the collaborating DRSC.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to discuss their proposed supplement project with investigators of the DRSC program that the applicant has identified as being of the greatest potential assistance to the proposed research. A letter of support from investigators of that DRSC, sent to the applicant through the Program Directors/Principal Investigators of that U54 program, will be needed to apply to the FOA. The application submitted in response to this FOA (i.e., the administrative supplement request/application) should include a figure or table that outlines the plans for work to be performed by the applicant/awardee and work to be performed by the collaborating DRSC. The chosen approach should clearly separate the work that is planned for performance at the applicant’s laboratory from that proposed for performance at the specified DRSC within the DRSN, and vice versa. (Note: The collaboration can include any one of the DRSCs in the DRSN.) The application should also clearly show how the work planned for performance by each of the partners (i.e., by the applicant/awardee and by the DRSC) is intended to be collaborative. Applicants should also discuss their application with the NCI Program Official of the parent grant prior to submission of a supplement application in order to ensure that the content area of the supplement fits within the scientific priorities of the NCI and is within the scope of the parent grant. In addition to contacting the NCI Program Official for the parent grant, applicants are strongly encouraged to include the Scientific/Research Contact person listed in Section VII. Agency Contacts in these communications.
The funding instrument will be the same as the parent award.
Grant: A support mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.
Cooperative Agreement: A support mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this FOA.
Non-competing Administrative Supplements
Not Allowed: Only accepting applications that do not propose clinical trials.
The number of awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
NCI intends to commit $500,000 in FY 2018 to fund two awards awards.
Application budgets are limited to no more than $250,000 total costs over 1 year, regardless of the number of collaborating units. This is exclusive of consortium costs and must reflect the actual needs of the proposed project. The budget should not include the estimated expenses of the collaborating DRSC.
The funding mechanism being used to support this program, administrative supplements, can be used to cover cost increases that are associated with achieving certain new research objectives, as long as the research objectives are within the original scope of the peer reviewed and approved project, or the cost increases are for unanticipated expenses within the original scope of the project. Any cost increases need to result from making modifications to the project that would increase or preserve the overall impact of the project consistent with its originally approved objectives and purposes.
The project and budget periods must be within the currently approved project period for the existing parent award. The budget period must be for 1 year only.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this FOA.
All organizations administering an eligible parent award may apply for a supplement under this announcement.
Higher Education Institutions
The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
This announcement is for supplements to existing projects. To be eligible, the parent award must be active and the research proposed in the supplement must be accomplished within the competitive segment. The proposed supplement must be to provide for an increase in costs due to unforeseen circumstances. All additional costs must be within the scope of the peer reviewed and approved project.
IMPORTANT: The research proposed by the NIH grantee in the supplement application must be within the original scope of the NIH-supported grant project.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are
not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are not allowed.
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. Since administrative supplements are made against active grants and cooperative agreements, many of these registrations may already be in place. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. The NIH Policy on Late Submission of Grant Applications states that failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission.
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons.If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Individual(s) must hold an active grant or cooperative
agreement, and the research proposed in the supplement must be accomplished
within the competitive segment of the active award. Individuals are encouraged to
work with their organizations to develop applications for support.
For supplements to parent awards that include multiple PDs/PIs, the supplement may be requested by any or all of the PDs/PIs (in accordance with the existing leadership plan) and submitted by the awardee institution of the parent award. Do not use this administrative supplement application to add, delete, or change the PDs/PIs listed on the parent award. Visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide for more information.
This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each is sufficiently distinct from any other administrative supplement currently under consideration by the awarding NIH Institute or Center.
Applicants must prepare applications using current forms in accordance with the Application Guide.
Buttons to access the online ASSIST system or to download application forms are available in Part 1 of this FOA. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
All forms must be completed for the supplemental activities only and must not reflect funding or activities for the previously awarded parent award.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions for their submission option (SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, eRA Commons Administrative Supplement User Guide or PHS 398 Application Guide, as appropriate) including Supplemental Grant Application Instructions except where instructed in this funding opportunity announcement to do otherwise. Conformance to documented requirements is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
For information on Application Submission and Receipt, visit Frequently Asked Questions – Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.
All page limitations applicable to the parent award as described in the Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
Administrative supplement requests for most single-project activity codes can be submitted using either paper or electronic submission processes. Administrative supplement requests for multi-project activity codes must be submitted using the paper submission process. See Activity Code section in Part 1 to determine if electronic submission is an option for your activity code.
Applicants submitting paper applications must use the PHS 398 Application Forms and the PHS 398 Application Guide.
Instructions for Electronic Application Submission through Grants.gov
Use the “Apply” button(s) in Part I of this announcement to access the application forms package posted at Grants.gov. If presented with more than one form package, use the Competition ID and Competition Titles provided to determine the most appropriate application forms package for your situation.
Prepare applications using the SF424 (R&R) forms associated with the chosen package. Please note that some forms marked optional in the application package are required for submission of applications for this announcement. Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide to ensure you complete all appropriate required and optional forms, with the following additional guidance:
Special Instructions for Streamlined Submissions using the eRA Commons for electronic-based submissions
NIH offers a streamlined system through the eRA Commons for submitting administrative supplements. Login to the eRA Commons, identify the parent award, and prepare an administrative supplement request. A User’s Guide for submitting through this system is available, with the following additional guidance:
Instructions for Paper-based Submissions using the PHS 398 Application Forms
Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant application forms and instructions for preparing a research grant application, with the following additional guidance:
The grantee institution, on behalf of the PD/PI of the parent award, must submit the request for supplemental funds directly to the awarding component that supports the parent award. Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the checklist, to:
National Cancer Institute (NCI) -- Shady Grove campus
9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 5W604
For USPS: Bethesda, MD 20892-9741
For Express Courier: Rockville, MD 20850
See Part 1. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov.
Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates and Times. Applicants are encouraged to submit electronic applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their electronic application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
For electronic application submission, information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424(R&R) Application Guide.
For paper-based application submission, information on the process of receipt and determining if your application is considered on-time is described in detail in the PHS 398 Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Applications must be submitted using the instructions specified above.
Applicants must complete all required registrations prior to submission. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit Applying Electronically. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Guidelines for Applicants Experiencing System Issues. For assistance with application submission contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
For applications submitted electronically on the SF424 (R&R) Application forms, all PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form of the SF 424(R&R) Application Package. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH.
The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the (SAM). Additional information may be found in the Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Administrative Supplements do not receive peer review. Instead, the administrative criteria described below will be considered in the administrative evaluation process.
The staff of the NIH awarding component will evaluate requests for a supplement to determine its overall merit. The following general criteria will be used:
Budget and Period of Support
NIH staff will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
NIH staff will consider the ability of the proposed supplement activities to increase or preserve the parent award’s overall impact within the original scope of award:
In addition, each of the following criteria will be evaluated as applicable for the proposed supplement.
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, NIH staff will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, NIH staff will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion (or exclusion) of children to determine if it is justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
NIH staff will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following five points: (1) description of proposed procedures involving animals, including species, strains, ages, sex, and total number to be used; (2) justifications for the use of animals versus alternative models and for the appropriateness of the species proposed; (3) interventions to minimize discomfort, distress, pain and injury; and (4) justification for euthanasia method if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. Reviewers will assess the use of chimpanzees as they would any other application proposing the use of vertebrate animals. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animal Section.
NIH staff will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
Administrative supplement requests will undergo an
administrative evaluation by NIH staff, but not a full peer review. Applications
submitted for this funding opportunity will be assigned to the awarding
component for the parent award and will be administratively evaluated using the
criteria shown above.
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization for successful applications. This may be as an NoA for the supplemental activities only; alternatively, it may be as either a revision to the current year NoA or included as part of a future year NoA. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via email to the grantee’s business official.
Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs.
Any application awarded in response to this FOA will be subject to terms and conditions found on the Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants website. This includes any recent legislation and policy applicable to awards that is highlighted on this website. When calculating the award for additional funds, NIH will 1) prorate funding if the requested budget period is adjusted at the time of award, and 2) use the institution’s current F&A rate; i.e., the rate in effect when the new funding is provided.
All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities. More information is provided at Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants.
Recipients of federal financial assistance (FFA) from HHS must administer their programs in compliance with federal civil rights law. This means that recipients of HHS funds must ensure equal access to their programs without regard to a person’s race, color, national origin, disability, age and, in some circumstances, sex and religion. This includes ensuring your programs are accessible to persons with limited English proficiency. HHS recognizes that research projects are often limited in scope for many reasons that are nondiscriminatory, such as the principal investigator’s scientific interest, funding limitations, recruitment requirements, and other considerations. Thus, criteria in research protocols that target or exclude certain populations are warranted where nondiscriminatory justifications establish that such criteria are appropriate with respect to the health or safety of the subjects, the scientific study design, or the purpose of the research.
For additional guidance regarding how the provisions apply to NIH grant programs, please contact the Scientific/Research Contact that is identified in Section VII under Agency Contacts of this FOA. HHS provides general guidance to recipients of FFA on meeting their legal obligation to take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to their programs by persons with limited English proficiency. Please see http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/resources/laws/revisedlep.html. The HHS Office for Civil Rights also provides guidance on complying with civil rights laws enforced by HHS. Please see http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/understanding/section1557/index.html; and http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/understanding/index.html. Recipients of FFA also have specific legal obligations for serving qualified individuals with disabilities. Please see http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/understanding/disability/index.html. Please contact the HHS Office for Civil Rights for more information about obligations and prohibitions under federal civil rights laws at http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/office/about/rgn-hqaddresses.html or call 1-800-368-1019 or TDD 1-800-537-7697. Also note it is an HHS Departmental goal to ensure access to quality, culturally competent care, including long-term services and supports, for vulnerable populations. For further guidance on providing culturally and linguistically appropriate services, recipients should review the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care at http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlid=53.
In accordance with the statutory provisions contained in Section 872 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417), NIH awards will be subject to the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) requirements. FAPIIS requires Federal award making officials to review and consider information about an applicant in the designated integrity and performance system (currently FAPIIS) prior to making an award. An applicant, at its option, may review information in the designated integrity and performance systems accessible through FAPIIS and comment on any information about itself that a Federal agency previously entered and is currently in FAPIIS. The Federal awarding agency will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgement about the applicant’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants as described in 45 CFR Part 75.205 “Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants.” This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award
Any supplements to Cooperative Agreements will be subject to the same Cooperative Agreement terms and conditions as the parent award.
Reporting requirements will be specified in the terms and conditions of award as applicable to the supplemental activities. In most non-competing continuation applications, the progress report and budget for the supplement must be included with, but clearly delineated from, the progress report and budget for the parent award. The progress report must include information about the activities supported by the supplement even if support for future years is not requested. Continuation of support for the supplement activities in the remaining years of the competitive segment of the grant will depend upon satisfactory review by the NIH awarding component of progress for both the parent award and the supplement project, the research proposed for the next budget period, and the appropriateness of the proposed budget for the proposed effort. This information is submitted with the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act), includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later. All awardees of applicable NIH grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at www.fsrs.gov on all subawards over $25,000. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement.
In accordance with the regulatory requirements provided at 45 CFR 75.113 and Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75, recipients that have currently active Federal grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all Federal awarding agencies with a cumulative total value greater than $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of a Federal award, must report and maintain the currency of information reported in the System for Award Management (SAM) about civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings in connection with the award or performance of a Federal award that reached final disposition within the most recent five-year period. The recipient must also make semiannual disclosures regarding such proceedings. Proceedings information will be made publicly available in the designated integrity and performance system (currently FAPIIS). This is a statutory requirement under section 872 of Public Law 110-417, as amended (41 U.S.C. 2313). As required by section 3010 of Public Law 111-212, all information posted in the designated integrity and performance system on or after April 15, 2011, except past performance reviews required for Federal procurement contracts, will be publicly available. Full reporting requirements and procedures are found in Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75 – Award Term and Conditions for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
Desk (Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons registration, submitting and
tracking an application, documenting system problems that threaten submission
by the due date, post submission issues)
Finding Help Online: http://grants.nih.gov/support/ (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
GrantsInfo (Questions regarding application instructions and
process, finding NIH grant resources)
Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov (preferred method of contact)
L. Austin Doyle, M.D.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 75.
Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files.