EXPIRED
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
FDA disclaimer:
The FDA does not follow the NIH Page Limitation Guidelines or the Enhanced Peer Review Scoring Criteria. Applicants are encouraged to consult with FDA Agency Contacts for additional information regarding page limits and the FDA Peer Review Process.
Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA)
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN)
Center for Tobacco Products (CTP)
National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR)
Office of the Commissioner (OC)
The Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM)
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
FDA Scientific Conference Grant Program (R13/U13)
Reissue of PA-11-310
PAR-14-237
Not Applicable
93.103
The purpose of the FDA (R13) Conference Grant and (U13) Cooperative Agreement is to facilitate the provision of federal financial assistance in support of small conferences and scientific meetings clearly aligned with the FDA mission. Prior approval (advance permission) is required before submission of an application for conference support. Advance permission to submit an application must be requested early in the process and no later than 8 weeks before the application submission date. Permission to submit a conference grant application does not assure funding or funding at the level requested. FDA will not issue a conference grant award unless it can be issued before the conference start date.
May 23, 2014
June 1, 2014
Not Applicable
July 15, 2014 (previous PA-11-310 )
After July 15, 2014 deadline the July 15 date will no longer be valid.
January 15, 2015 and June 15, 2015 by 11:59 PM Eastern Time
January 15, 2016 and June 15, 2016 by 11:59 PM Eastern Time
January 16, 2017 (Monday) and June 15, 2017 by 11:59 PM Eastern Time
Applicants are encouraged to apply early (no later than 6 months prior to the anticipated conference date(s)) to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date. Late applications will not be accepted.
Not Applicable
Deadline - Tentative Review
July 15 - August (previous PA-11-310) After July 15, 2014 deadline the July 15 date will no longer be valid.
January 15 - March
June 15 - August
Generally objective review will occur two-three months after application receipt date. However, objective review date(s) depends on the availability of qualified reviewers and may not occur as listed above. Applicants are strongly encouraged to pursue funding for their small conferences and scientific meetings well in advance of the anticipated meeting date.
Not Applicable
Deadline - Earliest Start Date
January 15 - April 1
June 15 - September 1
Note: Earliest start date depends on objective review date(s) and may not occur as listed above. Applicants are strongly encouraged to pursue funding for their small scientific conference well in advance of (at least 6 months) the anticipated meeting date.
New Date July 27, 2016 per issuance of PAR-16-378. (Original Expiration Date: June 16, 2017)
Not Applicable
Required Application Instructions
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Part 1. Overview Information
Part 2. Full Text of the Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section II. Award Information
Section III. Eligibility Information
Section IV. Application and Submission
Information
Section V. Application Review Information
Section VI. Award Administration Information
Section VII. Agency Contacts
Section VIII. Other Information
Therefore, a conference grant application is required to contain a permission-to-submit letter from one of the participating FDA Centers listed under Components of Participating Organizations.
Advance Permission to Submit an Application:
A letter requesting advance permission-to-submit a conference application is required and must be received via e-mail no later than eight (8) weeks prior to the selected application receipt date. The application receipt dates for conference grants are January 15 and June 15.
To request an advance permission to submit letter from one of the participating FDA Centers/Offices, applicants must submit the following information on applicant organizational letterhead:
All advance permission to submit an application requests must be submitted via email to [email protected]. Applicants are urged to initiate contact well in advance of the chosen application receipt date and no later than 8 weeks before that date. Please note that agreement to accept an application does not guarantee funding. Late applications will not be accepted.
Grant: A support mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.
Cooperative Agreement: A support mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, FDA scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities.
New
Renewal
The OER Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types.
Funding availability and award volume are contingent upon FDA appropriations and the number of meritorious applications received.
Application budgets submitted to the following FDA Centers/Office for review and funding consideration may not exceed the following in total cost per year:
OC: up to $50,000
CVM: up to $50,000
CTP: up to $50,000
ORA: up to $25,000
NCTR: up to $25,000
CFSAN: Unlimited
CBER: Unlimited
CDER: Unlimited
**ALL Funding consideration is based on the availability of Funds**
Application budgets must reflect actual needs of the proposed project. The amount of financial assistance requested from FDA is unlimited. For more information related to budget preparation see Section IV.2.
Note: Grantees requesting funding in excess of $100,000.00 require additional approval. Another form must be filled out by the IC and submitted 60 days in advance for approval.
Awards in support of a single conference will be made for a project period commensurate with the time involved in planning and conducting the conference; including post-conference activities. Typically, this will be one year. Applicants may propose a multi-year project period, up to 5 years, for permanently sponsored conferences held annually or biennially on a recurring topic or theme. The availability of funding for subsequent years of multi-year project periods depends on annual appropriations and grantee performance
FDA grants policies as described in the HHS Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.
Higher Education Institutions
The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for FDA support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
For-Profit Organizations
Governments
Other
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are
not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible
to apply.
Foreign components, as HHS Grants
Policy Statement explains, are not eligible to apply.
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission.
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account and should work with their organizational officials either to create a new account or to affiliate an existing account with the applicant organization’s eRA Commons account. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources
necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program
Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with
his/her organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from
underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with
disabilities are always encouraged to apply for FDA support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple
Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the
Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the SF424 (R&R)
Application Guide.
This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the HHS Grants Policy Statement.
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
FDA will not accept any application in response to this FOA that is essentially the same as one currently pending objective review unless the applicant withdraws the pending application.
Applicants must download the SF424 (R&R) application package associated with this funding opportunity using the Apply for Grant Electronically button in this FOA or following the directions provided at Grants.gov.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed in this funding opportunity announcement to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
For information on Application Submission and Receipt, visit Frequently Asked Questions Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.
All page limitations described in the SF424 Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed, with the following exceptions or additional requirements:
The forms package associated with this FOA includes all applicable components, required and optional. Please note that some components marked optional in the application package are required for submission of applications for this FOA. Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide to ensure you complete all appropriate optional components.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this FOA.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed. with the following additional instructions:
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed with the following additional instructions:
Advance permission to submit an application is required for all FDA conference grant applications, including new and renewal applications. Advance permission to submit an application should be requested early in the process and no later than eight weeks before the receipt date. The letter from an FDA Center/Office documenting advance permission to submit an application (i.e., the permission-to-submit letter) must be submitted with the application and attached as a PDF document in the PHS398 Cover Letter Component. All applicants must include the permission-to-submit letter from the FDA staff member who has agreed to accept assignment of the application. If an application is received without an advance permission-to-submit letter, it will not be accepted for review. Note that advance permission to submit an application does not guarantee funding.
Only one advance permission-to-submit letter is required per application.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Note that this section will be called Conference Plan in the system-generated Table of Contents.
The Conference Plan section of the application (uploaded as the Research Strategy attachment, line item #3), is where applicants should attach their narrative responses to the selection criteria and requirements published in this FOA.
The following information must be included and addressed in the Conference Plan (Research Strategy):
Applications requesting multiple years of support must provide the following additional information for each future year requested, in as much detail as possible: Budget, meeting topics, tentative dates, locations, participants, and contingency plans for future meetings dependent upon, for example, the outcome of the first year’s conference/meeting or developments in the field.
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans (Data Sharing Plan, Sharing Model Organisms, and Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS)) as provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, with the following modification:
Appendix: Do not use the Appendix to circumvent page limits. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, with the following modification:
Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies) using ASSIST or other electronic submission systems. Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, FDA’s electronic system for grants administration. FDA and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All FDA awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the HHS Grants Policy Statement. Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the HHS Grants Policy Statement.
Allowable Costs:
A.
Limitations or restrictions on countries to which travel will be supported or
B.
Budgetary or other limitations on availability of funds for foreign travel.
Unallowable Costs:
Conference awards should be issued before the actual start date of the conference.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit Applying Electronically.
Important
reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the
Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the
SF424(R&R) Application Package. Failure to register in the Commons and to
include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the
successful submission of an electronic application to FDA. See Section III of this FOA for information on
registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the
application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA
Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be
found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
See more
tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the assigned Grants Management Specialist and responsiveness by the appropriate FDA Center/Office. Applications that are incomplete and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in NOT-OD-13-030.
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. As part of the FDA mission, all applications submitted to the FDA in support of biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the FDA objective review system.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Significance (20 Points)
Does this conference/scientific meeting address an important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge or clinical practice be advanced? What will be the effect of these endeavors on the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?
Investigator(s) (20 Points)
Is (are) the PD/PI(s) well suited for organizing and fulfilling the goals of this conference/scientific meeting? Are the qualifications and past performance of the PD/PI(s) appropriate, and are they well suited for their described roles in the conference/scientific meeting? Are the key personnel and selected speakers appropriate and well suited for their described roles in the conference/scientific meeting?
Innovation (20 Points)
Does the conference/meeting employ novel approaches or methods to fulfill its purpose? Does the conference/scientific meeting draw together appropriate experts who may otherwise not have an opportunity to meet?
Approach (20 Points)
Are the format and agenda for the conference/meeting appropriate for achieving the specified goals? Is the conference/meeting timely for the subject matter? For applications designating multiple PDs/PIs, is the Leadership Plan approach, including the designated roles and responsibilities, governance and organizational structure consistent with and justified by the topics of the conference/meeting and the expertise of each of the PD/PIs?
Environment (20 Points)
Is the conference/scientific meeting site appropriate? Does the applicant organization have the ability to contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed meetings, exhibits, interactions, etc., take advantage of unique features of the environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is institutional support evident?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Protections for Human Subjects
Generally not applicable. Reviewers should bring any concerns to the attention of the assigned Grants Management Specialist.
Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children
Generally not applicable. Reviewers should bring any concerns to the attention of the assignedGrants Management Specialist.
Vertebrate Animals
Generally not applicable. Reviewers should bring any concerns to the attention of the assigned Grants Management Specialist.
Biohazards
Generally not applicable. Reviewers should bring any concerns to the attention of the assigned Grants Management Specialist.
Renewals
Applicable
Revisions
Not Applicable
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Applications from Foreign Organizations
Not Applicable
Select Agent Research
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Resource Sharing Plans
Not Applicable
Budget and Period of Support
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
All applications determined to be complete and responsive will undergo an objective review process. An objective review panel will evaluate complete and responsive applications according to the criteria listed in the Scored Review Criteria section above. FDA will also consider current priorities when making funding decisions
As part of the objective review, all applications:
Appeals of initial objective review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this FOA.
Applications will be ranked on the basis of their Composite Score and will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the HHS Grants Policy Statement.
If the application is under consideration for funding, FDA
will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as
described in the HHS Grants
Policy Statement.
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided
to the applicant organization for successful applications. The NoA signed by
the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via
email to the grantee’s business official.
Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions.
Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin
performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the
recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered
allowable pre-award costs.
Any application awarded in response to this FOA will be subject to the DUNS,
SAM Registration, and Transparency Act requirements as noted in the HHS Grants
Policy Statement.
All FDA grant and cooperative agreement awards include the HHS Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA.
All conference material (promotional materials, agenda, publications and internet sites) related to this project must include an acknowledgement of FDA grant support and a disclaimer stating the following:
Funding for this conference was made possible [in part] by [insert grant number] from [insert FDA Center/Office name]. The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Additional terms and conditions regarding FDA regulatory and Programmatic requirements may be part of the Notice of Award.
Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award
The administrative and funding mechanism used for this program is cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism in which substantial FDA programmatic involvement with the awardees is anticipated during the performance of the activities.
Under the cooperative agreement, FDA's purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the awardees for the project, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the awardees and FDA as defined below.
a. All awardees are required to participate in a cooperative manner with FDA.
b. Awardees will retain custody of and have primary rights to the data and software developed under these awards, subject to Government rights of access consistent with current DHHS, PHS, and FDA polices.
c. An agency program official or a Center program director will be responsible for the normal scientific and programmatic stewardship of the award and will be named in the award notice. FDA staffs have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards as described below.
Principal Investigator(s) (PI)/Program Director (PD) responsibility
The Principal Investigator (PI)/Program Director (PD) will have responsibility for the scientific, technical, and programmatic aspects of the grant and for day-to-day management of the project or program. The PD/PI(s) will maintain general oversight for ensuring compliance with the financial and administrative aspects of the award, as well as ensuring that all staff has sufficient clearance and/or background checks to work on this project or program. This individual will work closely with designated officials within the recipient organization to prepare justifications; appropriately acknowledge Federal support in publications, announcements, news programs, and other media; and ensure compliance with other Federal and organizational requirements.
The awardee is responsible for submitting interim progress reports (e.g. at specified intervals), when requested, to the FDA Project Officer (PO) and the Grants Management Specialist (listed as contacts on the Notice of Grant Award) including summary data on progress and expenses to date.
The awardee is encouraged to publish and publicly release and disseminate results, data and other products of the cooperative agreement, concordant with the governance and the approved plan for making data and materials available to the scientific community and FDA. Awardee will work with the appropriate FDA staff to develop and implement an appropriate rapid data release policy.
Manuscripts shall be submitted to FDA Project Officer within two weeks of submission for publication. Publications or oral presentations of work performed under this Cooperative Agreement will require appropriate acknowledgement of FDA support. Timely publication of major findings is encouraged
The awardee is responsible for obtaining approval for the development and design of FDA projects prior to execution.
FDA Project Officer Responsibility
An FDA Project Officer (PO) with scientific/technical expertise and other members of the FDA staff will have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below:
The responsibilities of the PO include involvement during conduct of the activity, through technical assistance, advice, coordination, and/or other assistance activities.
As appropriate, the PO will participate in the definition of objectives and approaches, and in planning, conducting, and publishing resulting work from activities under this cooperative agreement. However, the dominant role and prime responsibility for the activity reside with the awardees(s) for the project.
The PO will be responsible for the administration and general programmatic stewardship of the award and have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below:
The FDA through the PO will have access to data generated under this Cooperative Agreement and may periodically review the data and progress reports. The FDA PO may use information obtained from the data for the preparation of internal reports on the activities of the cooperative agreement. However, awardees will retain custody of and have primary rights to all data developed under these awards or as stated in the terms and conditions of award.
Retain the right to have prior approval on the appointment of all key personnel substantially supported by the grant.
Be directly involved in the guidance and development of the program and the collaborative structure of for the program.
Participate with the grantee in determining and carrying out the approaches to be used. Collaboration will also include identifying topics, agendas, participants, and dissemination of findings and where appropriate, co-authorship of publications.
Arrange to have professional scientific and administrative/clerical personnel working in collaboration with the grantee as required.
Collaborative Responsibilities
As relevant, the PD/PIs in collaboration with PO will work collaboratively in evaluating the most appropriate methods, publication and dissemination of findings. Projects require FDA approval prior to implementation/initiation.
During performance of the award, the PO, with assistance from other program staff, designated based on their relevant expertise, may provide appropriate assistance, advice and guidance. The role of the PO will be to facilitate and not to direct the activities. It is anticipated that decisions in all activities will be reached by consensus between the PD/PI and the PO and that the FDA programmatic staff will be given the opportunity to offer input into this process. The PO will facilitate liaison activity for partnerships, and provide assistance with access to FDA supported resources and services.
The FDA will work collaboratively to identify and coordinate training, professional development and training-related scientific exchange opportunities.
Dispute Resolution Process
Any disagreements that may arise in technical or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between award recipients and the FDA may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened. It will have three members: a designee of the FDA staff, one recipient designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area that is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual awardee. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the awardees right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulation 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and DHHS regulation 45 CFR Part 16.Disallowance of Cost.
Copyright
Except as provided in the conditions of the award, when a publication or similar copyrightable material is developed from work supported by HHS, the author is free to arrange for copyright without approval of the FDA. Such copyrighted materials are subject to a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to the Federal government to reproduce them, translate them, publish them, and use and dispose of them, and to authorize others to do so for Federal government purposes.
When multiple years are involved, awardees will be required to submit the annual Non-Competing Progress Report (PHS 2590 or RPPR) and financial statements as required in the HHS Grants Policy Statement.
A final progress report, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the HHS Grants Policy Statement.
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act), includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later. All awardees of applicable FDA grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at www.fsrs.gov on all subawards over $25,000. See the HHS Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity
and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk (Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons registration, submitting and tracking an application, documenting system
problems that threaten submission by the due date, post submission issues)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
Finding Help Online: http://grants.nih.gov/support/index.html
TTY: 301-451-5939
Email: [email protected]
Grants.gov Customer Support (Questions
regarding Grants.gov registration and submission, downloading forms and
application packages)
Contact CenterTelephone: 800-518-4726 Web ticketing system: https://grants-portal.psc.gov/ContactUs.aspx
Email: [email protected]
Martin Bernard
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Office of Acquisitions and Grants Services
Grants and Assistance Agreements Team
Ph: 240-402-7564
Email: [email protected]
Martin Bernard
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Office of Acquisitions and Grants Services
Grants and Assistance Agreements Team
Ph: 240-402-7564
Email: [email protected]
Recently issued trans-FDA policy notices may affect your application submission. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the HHS Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241) and under Federal Regulations 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.