EXPIRED
NIH EXPLORATORY/DEVELOPMENTAL RESEARCH GRANT AWARD (R21)
RELEASE DATE: April 18, 2003
PA NUMBER: PA-03-107 (This PA has been reissued as PA-06-181)
(See NOT-OD-06-048 for information on May 1, 2006
Submission Date for AIDS and AIDS-related R03
and R21 Applications)
(Peer Review contact change for NLM, see NOT-LM-05-007)
(See NOT-MH-05-015 and see change NOT-LM-04-002)
(Also see NOT-AR-04-001)
EXPIRATION DATE: May 02, 2006
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
(http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
(http://www.nida.nih.gov/)
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
(http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/)
National Eye Institute (NEI)
(http://www.nei.nih.gov/)
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
(http://www.nia.nih.gov/)
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
(http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/)
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
(http://www.niaid.nih.gov/default.htm)
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
(http://www.nibib1.nih.gov/)
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
(http://www.nichd.nih.gov/)
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
(http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/)
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
(http://www.niehs.nih.gov/)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
(http://www.nimh.nih.gov/)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
(http://www.ninds.nih.gov/)
National Library of Medicine (NLM)
(http://www.nlm.nih.gov/)
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
(http://www.niams.nih.gov/)
CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER(S): 93.333, 93.306, 93.867,
93.866, 93.273, 93.855, 93.856, 93.286, 93.287, 93.209, 93.864, 93.865,
93.929, 93.279, 93.173, 93.121, 93.113, 93.114, 93.115, 93.242, 93.879,
93.853, 93.389, 93.846
THIS PA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
o Purpose of the PA
o Research Objectives
o Mechanism of Support
o Eligible Institutions
o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators
o Where to Send Inquiries
o Submitting an Application
o Peer Review Process
o Review Criteria
o Award Criteria
o Required Federal Citations
PURPOSE OF THIS PA
This announcement redefines the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Award (R21) mechanism, and extends
its use as an investigator-initiated mechanism to the Institutes and Centers
(ICs) listed above. The R21 is intended to encourage exploratory and
developmental research projects by providing support for the early and
conceptual stages of these projects. The characteristics, requirements,
preparation, and review criteria for the R21 application are described.
Investigators wishing to apply for an R21 grant should be aware that not all
ICs accept investigator-initiated R21 applications. Investigators are
strongly encouraged to consult the R21 website at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/r21.htm to identify participating ICs
and relevant programmatic areas. Consultation with NIH staff listed on the
website is also encouraged. ICs that do not accept investigator-initiated
R21 applications may also solicit R21 applications to meet specific program
needs. Information related to the use of R21 awards by ICs that do not
participate in this program is also listed on the R21 website. Additional
information about special initiatives can be found in the NIH Guide for
Grants and Contracts at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html#search,
on IC websites, and through consultation with NIH staff. All investigator-
initiated exploratory/developmental grant applications described in this
announcement will be assigned to ICs according to standard PHS referral
guidelines and specific program interests.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The evolution and vitality of the biomedical sciences require a constant
infusion of new ideas, techniques, and points of view. These may differ
substantially from current thinking or practice and may not yet be supported
by substantial preliminary data. By using the R21 mechanism, the NIH seeks
to foster the introduction of novel scientific ideas, model systems, tools,
agents, targets, and technologies that have the potential to substantially
advance biomedical research.
The R21 mechanism is intended to encourage new exploratory and developmental
research projects. For example, such projects could assess the feasibility
of a novel area of investigation or a new experimental system that has the
potential to enhance health-related research. Another example could include
the unique and innovative use of an existing methodology to explore a new
scientific area. These studies may involve considerable risk but may lead
to a breakthrough in a particular area, or to the development of novel
techniques, agents, methodologies, models or applications that could have
major impact on a field of biomedical, behavioral, or clinical research.
Applications for R21 awards should describe projects distinct from those
supported through the traditional R01 mechanism. For example, long-term
projects, or projects designed to increase knowledge in a well-established
area will not be considered for R21 awards. Applications submitted under
this mechanism should be exploratory and novel. These studies should break
new ground or extend previous discoveries toward new directions or
applications. Projects of limited cost or scope that use widely accepted
approaches and methods within well established fields are better suited for
the R03 small grant mechanism. Information on the R03 program can be found
at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/r03.htm.
MECHANISM OF SUPPORT
Applicants responding to this PA must use the NIH Exploratory/Developmental
Research Grant (R21) award mechanism. The applicant will be solely
responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project.
The applicant may request a project period of up to two years with a combined
budget for direct costs of up $275,000 for the two year period. For example,
the applicant may request $100,000 in the first year and $175,000 in the
second year. The request should be tailored to the needs of the project.
Normally, no more than $200,000 may be requested in any single year.
This PA uses just-in-time concepts. It also uses the modular budgeting
format. (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm). All
applications submitted in response to this announcement must use the modular
budget format. This program does not require cost sharing as defined in the
current NIH Grants Policy Statement at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2001/part_i_1.htm.
Exploratory/developmental grant support is for new projects only; competing
continuation applications will not be accepted. Two revisions of a
previously reviewed exploratory/developmental grant application may be
submitted as defined in NIH Policy at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/amendedapps.htm.
ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS
Applications may be submitted by institution with any of the following
characteristics:
o For-profit or non-profit organizations
o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals,
and laboratories
o Units of State and local governments
o Eligible agencies of the Federal government
o Domestic or foreign
o Faith-based or community-based organizations
INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO BECOME PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS
Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry
out the proposed research is invited to work with their institution to
develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial
and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always
encouraged to apply for NIH programs.
WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES
The NIH encourages inquiries concerning this PA and welcomes the opportunity
answer questions from potential applicants. Participating ICs and their
contacts are listed at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/r21.htm.
SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION
Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant application
instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). The PHS 398 is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in an interactive
format. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone (301) 710-0267,
Email: [email protected].
The title and number of this program announcement must be typed on line 2 of
the face page of the application form and the YES box must be checked.
APPLICATION RECEIPT DATES: Beginning with the June 1, 2003 receipt date,
applications submitted in response to this program announcement will be
accepted at the standard application deadlines, which are available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/dates.htm. Application deadlines are also
indicated in the PHS 398 application kit.
SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS: All instructions for the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001)
must be followed, with these exceptions:
o Research Plan
Items a - d of the Research Plan (Specific Aims, Background and Significance,
Preliminary Studies, and Research Design and Methods) may not exceed a total
of 15 pages. No preliminary data is required but may be included if it is
available. Please note that a Progress Report is not needed; competing
continuation applications for an exploratory/developmental grant will not be
accepted.
Appendix. Use the instructions for the appendix detailed in the PHS 398
except that no more than 5 manuscripts, previously accepted for publication,
may be included.
SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR MODULAR GRANT APPLICATIONS: All investigator
initiated R21 applications must be submitted in a modular grant format. The
modular grant format simplifies the preparation of the budget in these
applications by limiting the level of budgetary detail. Applicants request
direct costs in $25,000 modules. Section C of the research grant application
instructions for the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001) at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html includes step-by-step
guidance for preparing modular grants. Additional information on modular
grants is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm.
For the NIH Exploratory/Developmental Grant (R21), applicants may request
direct costs in $25,000 modules, up to a total direct cost of $275,000 for
the combined two year award period.
SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH: Submit a signed, typewritten original of
the application, including the checklist, and five signed photocopies in one
package to:
Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD 20892-7710
Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)
APPLICATION PROCESSING: Applications must be received by or mailed on or
before the receipt dates described at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/submissionschedule.htm. The CSR will
not accept any application in response to this PA that is essentially the
same as one currently pending initial review unless the applicant withdraws
the pending application. The CSR will not accept any application that is
essentially the same as one already reviewed. This does not preclude the
submission of a substantial revision of an R21 application already reviewed,
but such application must include an Introduction addressing the previous
critique.
Although there is no immediate acknowledgement of the receipt of an
application, applicants are generally notified of the review and funding
assignment within 8 weeks.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Applications submitted for this PA will be assigned on the basis of
established PHS referral guidelines. An appropriate scientific review group,
convened either by the relevant IC or by CSR in accordance with the standard
NIH peer review procedures (http://www.csr.nih.gov/refrev.htm), will evaluate
applications for scientific and technical merit.
As part of the initial merit review, all applications will:
o Receive a written critique
o Undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have
the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of applications under
review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score
o Receive a second level review by the appropriate national advisory council
or board
REVIEW CRITERIA
The NIH R21 exploratory/developmental grant is a mechanism for supporting
novel scientific ideas or new model systems, tools or technologies that have
the potential to significantly advance our knowledge or the status of health-
related research. Because the research plan is limited to 15 pages, an
exploratory/developmental grant application need not have extensive
background material or preliminary information as one might normally expect
in an R01 application. Accordingly, reviewers will focus their evaluation on
the conceptual framework, the level of innovation, and the potential to
significantly advance our knowledge or understanding. Reviewers will place
less emphasis on methodological details and certain indicators traditionally
used in evaluating the scientific merit of R01 applications including
supportive preliminary data. Appropriate justification for the proposed work
can be provided through literature citations, data from other sources, or,
when available, from investigator-generated data. Preliminary data are not
required for R21 applications.
The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of
biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In
the written comments, reviewers will be asked to discuss the following
aspects of the application in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed
research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals:
o Significance
o Approach
o Innovation
o Investigator
o Environment
The scientific review group will address and consider each of these criteria
in assigning the application's overall score, weighting them as appropriate
for each application. The application does not need to be strong in all
categories to be judged likely to significantly advance current knowledge and
thus deserve a meritorious priority score.
SIGNIFICANCE: Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of
the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What
will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive
this field?
APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses
adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the
project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider
alternative tactics?
INNOVATION: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or methods?
Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing
paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies?
INVESTIGATOR: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited to
carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level
of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)?
ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done
contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take
advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful
collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support?
ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA: In addition to the above criteria, the following
items will be considered in the determination of scientific merit and the
priority score:
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FROM RESEARCH RISK: The involvement of human
subjects and protections from research risk relating to their participation
in the proposed research will be assessed. (See criteria included in the
section on Federal Citations, below).
INCLUSION OF WOMEN, MINORITIES AND CHILDREN IN RESEARCH: The adequacy of
plans to include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic groups
(and subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the
research will be assessed. Plans for the recruitment and retention of
subjects will also be evaluated. (See Inclusion Criteria in the sections on
Federal Citations, below).
CARE AND USE OF VERTEBRATE ANIMALS IN RESEARCH: If vertebrate animals are to
be used in the project, the five items described under Section f of the PHS
398 research grant application instructions (rev. 5/2001) will be assessed.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested period
of support in relation to the proposed research.
AWARD CRITERIA
Applications submitted in response to this PA will compete for available
funds with all other recommended applications. The following will be
considered in making funding decisions:
o Scientific merit of the proposed project as determined by peer review
o Availability of funds
o Relevance to program priorities
REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION: Federal regulations (45CFR46) require that
applications and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated with
reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against
these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and
others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained.
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
MONITORING PLAN AND DATA SAFETY AND MONITORING BOARD: Research components
involving Phase I and II clinical trials must include provisions for
assessment of patient eligibility and status, rigorous data management,
quality assurance, and auditing procedures. In addition, it is NIH policy
that all clinical trials require data and safety monitoring, with the method
and degree of monitoring being commensurate with the risks (NIH Policy for
Data Safety and Monitoring, NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, June 12,
1998: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html).
INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH: It is the policy of
the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations
must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a
clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is
inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the
research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section
492B of Public Law 103-43).
All investigators proposing clinical research should read the "NIH Guidelines
for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research -
Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts
on October 9, 2001 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-
files/NOT-OD-02-001.html); a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm.
The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical
research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB
standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical
trials consistent with the new PHS Form 398; and updated roles and
responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy
continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a)
all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of
plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by
sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable;
and b) investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting
analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group
differences.
INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS:
The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of
21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported
by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include
them. This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for
receipt dates after October 1, 1998.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the
"NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as participants in
research involving human subjects that is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm.
REQUIRED EDUCATION ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECT PARTICIPANTS: NIH
policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants for
all investigators submitting NIH proposals for research involving human
subjects. You will find this policy announcement in the NIH Guide for Grants
and Contracts Announcement, dated June 5, 2000, at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS (hESC): Criteria for federal funding of research on
hESCs can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/stem_cells.htm and at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-005.html. Only
research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human Embryonic Stem
Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal funding (see http://escr.nih.gov).
It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the official NIH
identifier(s)for the hESC line(s)to be used in the proposed research.
Applications that do not provide this information will be returned without
review.
PUBLIC ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT: The
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to
provide public access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a
project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2)
cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action
that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed
through FOIA. It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope
of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm.
Applicants may wish to place data collected under this PA in a public
archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the
distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should
include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include
information about this in the budget justification section of the
application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure
informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the
potential for wider use of data collected under this award.
STANDARDS FOR PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIABLE HEALTH INFORMATION: The
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued final modification to
the "Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information",
the "Privacy Rule," on August 14, 2002. The Privacy Rule is a federal
regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually identifiable
health information, and is administered and enforced by the DHHS Office for
Civil Rights (OCR). Those who must comply with the Privacy Rule (classified
under the Rule as "covered entities") must do so by April 14, 2003 (with the
exception of small health plans which have an extra year to comply).
Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside
with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR website
(http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/) provides information on the Privacy Rule, including
a complete Regulation Text and a set of decision tools on "Am I a covered
entity?" Information on the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH
processes involving the review, funding, and progress monitoring of grants,
cooperative agreements, and research contracts can be found at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html.
URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES: All applications and proposals
for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations.
Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, Internet addresses (URLs)
should not be used to provide information necessary to the review because
reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites. Furthermore,
we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be compromised when they
directly access an Internet site.
HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to
achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy
People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This PA
is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may
obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS: This program is described in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance at http://www.cfda.gov/ and is not subject to the
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health
Systems Agency review. Awards are made under the authorization of Sections
301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284)
and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. All
awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other
considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The NIH Grants
Policy Statement can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm
The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free
workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition,
Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in
certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which
regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early
childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent
with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of
the American people.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
| ||||||
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health® |