This Program Announcement expires 3 years from the Release Date shown 
directly below.


Release Date:  May 24, 2000

PA NUMBER:  PA-00-100

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism


The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) invites 
applications to support the secondary analysis of existing data sets relevant 
to developing a knowledge base to improve the delivery of services for 
alcohol-related problems, including both treatment and preventive 
interventions. This program announcement replaces and supersedes PA-97-066 of 
the same title. 

Research grants for the Secondary Analysis of Existing Health Services Data 
Sets are intended to more fully utilize currently available data sets and to 
provide support for studies that increase knowledge related to improving the 
availability, accessibility, delivery, quality, effectiveness, cost-
effectiveness, and outcomes of alcohol-related treatment and prevention 
services. Data used in secondary analyses may be obtained from current or 
past investigator-initiated research activities or from other archival data 
sets from public or private sources. Of particular interest is research that 
employs analytic techniques that demonstrate or promote methodological 
advances in the area of alcohol-related health services research. 

Research objectives of this program announcement include, but are not limited 
to, six major areas:  (1) determining the effects of various financing and 
reimbursement mechanisms on alcohol-related health care program availability, 
accessibility, delivery, organization, content, quality, and outcomes; (2) 
assessing sources of variation in access to, and utilization of, treatment 
and prevention interventions for alcohol-related problems; (3) examining the 
possible impact of managed care on alcohol treatment and prevention services; 
(4) identifying organizational and managerial factors that influence the 
delivery of treatment and prevention services for alcohol-related problems, 
either within or across regions, populations, and settings; (5) evaluating 
the cost, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, and cost-utility of alcohol-
related treatment and prevention services; and (6) identifying and assessing 
the effectiveness and outcomes of alcohol-related treatment and preventive 


The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health 
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS 
led national activity for setting priority areas. This Program Announcement 
(PA), Secondary Analysis of Existing Health Services Data Sets, is related to 
one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of 
"Healthy People 2010" at:


Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign, for-profit and non-
profit organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges, 
hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and eligible 
agencies of the Federal Government. Racial/ethnic minority individuals, 
women, and persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply as Principal 

Research support may be obtained through applications for a research project 
grant (R01) or an exploratory/developmental grant (R21). Applications for 
R01s may request support for up to 5 years. Facilities and Administrative 
(F&A) costs will be awarded based on the negotiated rate at the time of the 
award. Applicants without extensive preliminary data are urged to submit 
applications for this PA using the exploratory/developmental grant mechanism. 
More detailed information on the R21 mechanism can be found at 
Exploratory/developmental grants cannot be renewed; however, a no-cost 
extension of up to one year may be granted prior to expiration of the project 
period. Investigators are encouraged to seek continued support after 
completing an exploratory/developmental grant project through a research 
project grant (R01). 

Applicants who anticipate submitting an application under this PA should 
contact the program staff listed under INQUIRIES or the NIAAA Home Page at for additional information. 

Specific application instructions have been modified to reflect "MODULAR 
GRANT" and "JUST-IN-TIME" streamlining efforts being examined by the NIH. 
Complete and detailed instructions and information on Modular Grant 
applications can be found at 

The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism seeks to promote the 
use of secondary analyses of data in the expansion of knowledge to improve 
the delivery of services for alcohol-related problems where appropriate data 
sets and analytic techniques are available.  The specific objectives of this 
announcement on the Secondary Analysis of Existing Health Services Data Sets 
are to provide support for (a) analyzing previously collected data that would 
advance -- in cost effective ways -- scientific knowledge of alcohol-related 
health services issues or (b) applying new approaches to analyze current data 
sets that would benefit from further exploration.  Grants under this 
announcement are not intended as a means to carry out currently ongoing data 
analysis or for the maintenance and distribution of data sets.
Biomedical research in general, and health services research in particular, 
typically generate data sets with potential utility beyond the specific 
hypotheses and questions for which a particular study was designed. Often 
these data are not fully analyzed, especially when unexpected research 
questions emerge subsequent to the close of the original funding period. 
Existing data sets can provide an expeditious and cost-effective means of 
testing specific hypotheses that have not yet been examined adequately. In 
addition, the analysis of existing research data may be prompted by a need to 
confirm new findings in the field or to aid in the development of new 
research questions.  

Other data sets, including survey and epidemiologic data as well as health 
care utilization, cost, and insurance claims data, are compiled by Federal, 
State, and local government agencies, or by private entities such as 
insurance companies, Health Maintenance Organizations, other third-party 
payers, and large to mid-size corporations. While such data sets may not have 
been intended initially for use within a research context, they are 
potentially rich sources of information that can illuminate a wide range of 
research questions and policy-relevant topics. When appropriate, secondary 
data analyses may serve as an economical alternative to expensive and time-
consuming data collection projects. 

Beyond the examination of specific research hypotheses, existing data sets 
may be used to cross-validate exploratory analyses in ongoing studies, to 
test complex statistical models, and in special circumstances to provide 
comparison groups for experimental studies.  Meta-analyses, in which results 
from multiple studies may be compared or combined, are considered to be a 
form of secondary data analysis for the purposes of this program 
announcement.  Moreover, potential applicants should note that secondary 
analysis may be appropriate to all types of data, including qualitative 
information, and also covers the integration of quantitative and qualitative 

Health services research is defined as "research endeavors that study the 
impact of the organization, financing and management of health services on 
the quality, cost, access to and outcomes of care" (P.L. 101-321, Section 
409).  Health services research also is concerned with assessing the 
effectiveness of health services in everyday practice. 

For the purposes of this announcement, this includes: (a) the impact of 
health services and the effects of organizational and financing arrangements 
in "real world" clinical settings on the quality and outcomes of care 
provided to patients with alcohol abuse and alcoholism or with medical 
problems consequent to alcoholism; and (b) the impact of prevention services 
on the demand for and utilization of alcohol-related services, as well as the 
financing, organization, management, implementation, cost, and utilization of 
the prevention services themselves. As directed by legislation (P.L. 103-43), 
health services research, for the purposes of this announcement, does not 
include studies of the efficacy of preventive, diagnostic, and treatment 

Applicants may choose to carry out analyses relevant to alcohol-related 
health services research using large, nationally representative data sets or 
smaller, regional, and locally based data sets. A number of such data sets 
exist in the public domain, which contain items relevant to alcohol use and 
abuse and may not have been fully analyzed.  Two resource documents which 
list data sets that may be of potential interest to health services 
researchers are readily available from NIAAA: 

(1) Inventory of Databases for Health Services Research on Alcohol Treatment 
and Prevention, which lists publicly- and privately-supported data sets 
containing information on the utilization, cost, financing, management, 
organization, or effectiveness of alcohol treatment or prevention services 
(copies may be obtained from the NIAAA Health Services Research Branch, 6000 
Executive Boulevard, MSC 7003, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003; 301/443-0786); and 

(2) Alcohol Epidemiologic Data Directory, which identifies national-scope and 
special population data sets that are available for expanded epidemiologic 
study (copies may be obtained from CSR Incorporated, Suite 200, 1400 Eye 
Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20005; 202/842-7600). 

Other examples include data sets collected or coordinated by agencies of the 
Federal Government (e.g., surveys carried out by the National Center for 
Health Statistics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
Medicaid and Medicare data compiled by the Health Care Financing 
Administration), various State governments, and regional or local 
governments.  Applicants may secure access to other data sets that may or may 
not be in the public domain, such as those collected under research grant 
funds, sponsored by private entities (e.g., philanthropic foundations, Health 
Maintenance Organizations, or commercial businesses) or originally collected 
for purposes other than research (e.g., health care or insurance data). 

Examples of general types of secondary analyses that may be considered within 
the scope of this announcement are given below. This list is illustrative and 
not exhaustive; prospective proposals need not be limited by these examples.  
Scientific considerations and the potential benefit of the proposed analyses 
should guide any proposed research. 

New analyses of a current (or past) study: Investigators may wish to take 
advantage of opportunities for additional analyses if they are justified as a 
new stand-alone research project grant for secondary data analysis. 
Additional analyses are ideal for investigating additional hypotheses beyond 
those tested in the original study.

Large sample or multiple sample comparisons: Investigators may seek large 
archival data sets with identified subgroups or multiple data sets for 
comparison with each other. For example, an investigator may wish to obtain 
two or more data sets for the development and testing of integrated research 
hypotheses for multiple cohorts, different genders, or different ethnic 

Methodology development: Single or multiple data sets may be obtained to 
demonstrate new or improved research design, measurement, or analytic 
techniques.  For example, researchers may wish to develop new analytic 
techniques for longitudinal designs that take into account transitions 
between alcohol and other drug use behaviors over time, or the simulation of 
complex systems that predict use of alcohol treatment at an individual, 
group, or community level.  Measurement issues may also be addressed for 
different variable and construct domains to facilitate more accurate item 
equating, norming and further validation of outcome measures, or the 
development of new measures. The development of improved techniques to 
measure the costs, cost-effectiveness, or cost-benefits of alcohol treatment 
and prevention services is encouraged under this announcement. 

Developmental Projects: Investigators may be interested in examining the 
feasibility of using certain types of data records or certain kinds of data 
sets for answering alcohol-related health services research questions, 
especially if the proposed analyses previously have not been widely used on 
those types of records or data sets.  Examples include abstracting from 
medical encounter records, accessing insurance claims and reimbursement data, 
and analyzing epidemiological or general health data. 


It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and 
their subpopulations must be included in all NIH supported biomedical and 
behavioral research projects involving human subjects, unless a clear and 
compelling rationale and justification are provided that inclusion is 
inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of 
the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 
(Section 492B of Public Law 103-43).

All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the 
"NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical 
Research," which have been published in the Federal Register of March 28, 
1994 (FR 59 14508-14513) and in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, Vol. 
23, No. 11, March 18, 1994 and is available on the web at the following URL 


It is the policy of NIH that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) 
must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by 
the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them. 
This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for 
receipt dates after October 1, 1998. 

All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the 
"NIH Policy and Guidelines on the Inclusion of Children as Participants in 
Research Involving Human Subjects" that was published in the NIH Guide for 
Grants and Contracts, March 6, 1998, and is available at the following URL 

Investigators also may obtain copies of these policies from the program staff 
listed under INQUIRIES. Program staff may also provide additional relevant 
information concerning the policy. 


All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within 
specified page limitations. Unless otherwise specified in an NIH 
solicitation, internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide 
information necessary to the review because reviewers are under no obligation 
to view the Internet sites. Reviewers are cautioned that their anonymity may 
be compromised when they directly access an Internet site. 


Applications are to be submitted on the grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 
4/98) and will be accepted at the standard application deadlines as indicated 
in the application kit. Application kits are available at most institutional 
offices of sponsored research and may be obtained from the Division of 
Extramural Outreach and Information Resources, National Institutes of Health, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7910, Bethesda, MD 20892-7910, telephone 301-710-0267, email: Applications are also available at: 

Applicants planning to submit an investigator-initiated new (type 1), 
competing continuation (type 2), competing supplement, or any amended/revised 
version of the preceding grant application types requesting $500,000 or more 
in direct costs for any year are advised that he or she must contact the 
Institute or Center (IC) program staff before submitting the application, 
i.e., as plans for the study are being developed. Furthermore, the 
application must obtain agreement from the IC staff that the IC will accept 
the application for consideration for award. Finally, the applicant must 
identify, in a cover letter sent with the application, the staff member and 
Institute or Center who agreed to accept assignment of the application. 

This policy requires an applicant to obtain agreement for acceptance of both 
any such application and any such subsequent amendment. Refer to the NIH 
Guide for Grants and Contracts, March 20, 1998 at

The modular grant concept establishes specific modules in which direct costs 
may be requested as well as a maximum level for requested budgets. Only 
limited budgetary information is required under this approach. The just-in-
time concept allows applicants to submit certain information only when there 
is a possibility for an award. It is anticipated that these changes will 
reduce the administrative burden for the applicants, reviewer's and Institute 
staff. The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 4/98) is to be used 
in applying for these grants, with the modifications noted below. 


Modular Grant applications will request direct costs in $25,000 modules, up 
to a total direct cost request of $250,000 per year for R01 applications and 
up to a total direct cost request of $100,000 per year for R21 applications. 
The total direct costs must be requested in accordance with the program 
guidelines and the modifications made to the standard PHS 398 application 
instructions described below: 

PHS 398 

o FACE PAGE - Items 7a and 7b should be completed, indicating Direct Costs 
(in $25,000 increments up to a maximum of $250,000 for R01 applications and a 
maximum of $100,000 for R21 applications) and Total Costs [Modular Total 
Direct plus Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs] for the initial budget 
period. Items 8a and 8b should be completed indicating the Direct and Total 
Costs for the entire proposed period of support. 

of the PHS 398. It is not required and will not be accepted with the 

categorical budget table on Form Page 5 of the PHS 398. It is not required 
and will not be accepted with the application. 

o NARRATIVE BUDGET JUSTIFICATION - Prepare a Modular Grant Budget Narrative 
page. (See for 
sample pages.) At the top of the page, enter the total direct costs requested 
for each year. This is not a Form page. 

o Under Personnel, list key project personnel, including their names, percent 
of effort, and roles on the project. No individual salary information should 
be provided. However, the applicant should use the NIH appropriation language 
salary cap and the NIH policy for graduate student compensation in developing 
the budget request. 

For Consortium/Contractual costs, provide an estimate of total costs (direct 
plus facilities and administrative) for each year, each rounded to the 
nearest $1,000. List the individuals/ organizations with whom consortium or 
contractual arrangements have been made, the percent effort of key personnel, 
and the role on the project. Indicate whether the collaborating institution 
is foreign or domestic. The total cost for a consortium/contractual 
arrangement is included in the overall requested modular direct cost amount. 
Include the Letter of Intent to establish a consortium. 

Provide an additional narrative budget justification for any variation in the 
number of modules requested. 

o BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH - The Biographical Sketch provides information used by 
reviewers in the assessment of each individual's qualifications for a 
specific role in the proposed project, as well as to evaluate the overall 
qualifications of the research team. A biographical sketch is required for 
all key personnel, following the instructions below. No more than three pages 
may be used for each person. A sample biographical sketch may be viewed at: 

o  Complete the educational block at the top of the form page.
o  List position(s) and any honors;
o  Provide information, including overall goals and responsibilities, on 
research projects ongoing or completed during the last three years. 
o  List selected peer-reviewed publications, with full citations. 

o CHECKLIST - This page should be completed and submitted with the 
application. If the F&A rate agreement has been established, indicate the 
type of agreement and the date. All appropriate exclusions must be applied in 
the calculation of the F&A costs for the initial budget period and all future 
budget years. 

o The applicant should provide the name and phone number of the individual to 
contact concerning fiscal and administrative issues if additional information 
is necessary following the initial review. 

o The applicant should provide the name and phone number of the individual to 
contact concerning fiscal and administrative issues if additional information 
is necessary following the initial review. 

Applications not conforming to these guidelines will be considered 
unresponsive to this PA and will be returned without further review. 

The title and number of the program announcement must be typed on line 2 of 
the face page of the application form and the YES box must be marked. 

Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the 
Checklist, and five signed photocopies in one package to: 

6701 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE, ROOM 1040, MSC 7710 
BETHESDA, MD 20892-7710 
BETHESDA, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)


Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral 
guidelines. Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit 
by an appropriate scientific review group convened in accordance with the 
standard NIH peer review procedures. As part of the initial merit review, all 
applications will receive a written critique and undergo a process in which 
only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, 
generally the top half of applications under review, will be discussed, 
assigned a priority score, and receive a second level review by the National 
Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 

Review Criteria 

The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of 
biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In 
the written comments reviewers will be asked to discuss the following aspects 
of the application in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed 
research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each 
of these criteria will be addressed and considered in assigning the overall 
score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. Note that the 
application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely 
to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For 
example, an investigator may propose to carry out important work that by its 
nature is not innovative but is essential to move a field forward. 

(1)  Significance: Does this study address an important problem? If the aims 
of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? 
What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that 
drive this field? 

(2)  Approach: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses 
adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the 
project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider 
alternative tactics? 

(3)  Innovation: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or 
method? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge 
existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? 

(4)  Investigator: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well-suited 
to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience 
level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)? 

(5)  Environment: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be 
done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments 
take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ 
useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional 

In addition to the above criteria, in accordance with NIH policy, all 
applications will also be reviewed with respect to the following: 

o The adequacy of plans to include both genders, minorities and their 
subgroups, and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the 

o The reasonableness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to the 
proposed research.

o The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans, animals or the 
environment, to the extent they may be adversely affected by the project 
proposed in the application. 

Additional consideration pertinent to the review of Exploratory/Developmental 
Grant (R21) applications: 

- Pilot/feasibility studies may contain little or no preliminary data. Review 
should focus on whether the rationale for the study is well developed and 
whether the proposed research is likely to generate data that will lead to a 
regular research project grant or full-scale clinical trial. Adequate 
justification for the proposed work may be provided through literature 
citations, data from other sources, or investigator-generated data. 

Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended 
applications assigned to the Institute.  The following will be considered in 
making funding decisions:  scientific merit of the proposed project as 
determined by peer review, availability of funds, and program priority.
Inquiries are encouraged.  The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions 
from potential applicants is welcome.  Direct inquiries regarding 
programmatic issues to:
Harold I. Perl, Ph.D.
Health Services Research Branch
Division of Clinical and Prevention Research
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
6000 Executive Boulevard, Suite 505, MSC 7003
Bethesda, MD  20892-7003
Telephone:  301-443-0788
FAX:  301-443-8774
Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Edward Ellis
Grants Management Branch
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Willco Building, Suite 504
6000 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7003
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7003
Telephone:  301-443-4703
FAX: 301-443-3891


This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 
93.273. Awards are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, 
Title IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410), as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42 USC 
241, 285 and 290) and administered under NIH grants policies and Federal 
Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. This program is not subject 
to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or 
Health Systems Agency review. 

The PHS strongly encourages all grant and contract recipients to provide a 
smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. In 
addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking 
in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which 
regular or routine education, library, day care, health care or early 
childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent 
with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of 
the American people. 

Return to Volume Index

Return to NIH Guide Main Index

Office of Extramural Research (OER) - Home Page Office of Extramural
Research (OER)
  National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Home Page National Institutes of Health (NIH)
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Home Page Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) - Government Made Easy

Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files.