Department of Health and Human Services
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Funding Opportunity Title
The Early Detection Research Network: Biomarker Developmental Laboratories (U01)
U01 Research Project – Cooperative Agreements
Reissue of RFA-CA-09-017
- March 17, 2016 - This RFA has been reissued as RFA-CA-16-009.
- November 20, 2014 - See Notice NOT-CA-15-003. Notice of Change in Application Due Date for RFA-CA-14-014 "The Early Detection Research Network: Biomarker Developmental Laboratories (U01)"
- November 17, 2014 - See Notice NOT-CA-15-002. Notice of Pre-application Teleconference for RFA-CA-14-014, RFA-CA-14-015, RFA-CA-14-016, and RFA-CA-14-017 for The "Early Detection Research Network" Program.
Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number
Companion Funding Opportunity
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s)
Funding Opportunity Purpose
The purpose of this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is to solicit applications for Biomarker Developmental Laboratories (BDLs), one of the four scientific units of the Early Detection Research Network (EDRN). The EDRN is a national infrastructure funded to discover, develop, and validate biomarkers for risk assessment, detection, and molecular diagnosis and prognosis of early cancer. The proposed BDLs will be responsible for the discovery, development, characterization, and testing of new, or the refinement of existing, biomarkers and biomarker assays for risk assessment, detection, and molecular diagnosis and prognosis of early cancer.
The other three scientific units of the continuing EDRN program are: the Biomarker Reference Laboratories (BRLs), which will serve as Network resources for clinical and laboratory validation of biomarkers; the Clinical Validation Centers (CVCs), which will conduct clinical research on the validation of biomarkers and will serve as resource centers for the EDRN by participating in collaborative biomarker validation studies with EDRN BDLs and BRLs; and the Data Management and Coordinating Center (DMCC), which will support statistical and computational analyses, informatics infrastructure, study design, coordination and support of EDRN-sponsored biomarker validation studies, and the coordination of Network-wide meetings and conferences.
November 6, 2014
Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)
New Date: December 20, 2014 per NOT-CA-15-003.
December 6, 2014
Letter of Intent Due Date(s)
New Date: December 20, 2014 per NOT-CA-15-003.
December 6, 2014
Application Due Date(s)
New Date: January 20, 2015 per NOT-CA-15-003
January 6, 2015, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization. All types of non-AIDS applications allowed for this funding opportunity announcement are due on this date.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
AIDS Application Due Date(s)
Scientific Merit Review
Advisory Council Review
Earliest Start Date
New Date: January 21, 2015 per NOT-CA-15-003.
January 7, 2015
Due Dates for E.O. 12372
Required Application Instructions
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Table of Contents
This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is part of the Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) initiative. EDRN (http://edrn.nci.nih.gov/) is a national, integrated infrastructure for the development of biomarkers and the assembly of necessary resources. The goal of EDRN is the development, evaluation, and validation of biomarkers for risk assessment, detection, and the molecular diagnosis and prognosis of early cancer.
The purpose of this FOA is to solicit applications for EDRN Biomarker Developmental Laboratories (BDLs). The proposed BDLs will be responsible for the development and characterization of new or the refinement of existing biomarkers and biomarker assays for early cancer detection, risk assessment, and molecular diagnosis and prognosis of early cancer. Prior affiliation with the EDRN is not required and all qualified investigators are invited to apply.
In addition to BDLs (this FOA), EDRN includes the following three scientific units, each supported by an independent FOA:
- Clinical Validation Centers (CVCs) (RFA-CA-14-015 U01), which will conduct clinical research to validate biomarkers for risk assessment, detection, and the molecular diagnosis and prognosis of early cancer. CVCs will also serve as resource centers for collaborative research within the EDRN by participating in collaborative biomarker validation studies and collaborating with EDRN BDLs and BRLs;
- Biomarker Reference Laboratories (BRLs) (RFA-CA-14-016 U24), which will serve as a Network resource for clinical and laboratory validation of biomarkers, including assay development and refinement; and
- Data Management and Coordinating Center (DMCC) (RFA-CA-14-017 U24), which will conduct statistical and computational analyses and data management, study protocol development, study design, and coordination of EDRN-sponsored biomarker validation studies, participate in the development and maintenance of informatics infrastructure, and coordinate Network-wide meetings and conferences.
Biomarker Definition. In the context of this FOA, biomarkers are defined as cellular, biochemical, and/or molecular (including genetic and epigenetic) characteristics by which normal and/or abnormal biological processes can be recognized and/or monitored. Biomarkers are measurable in biological materials, such as in tissues, cells, and/or bodily fluids.
EDRN Scientific Premise
Since its inception in 2000, the EDRN has followed a "vertical" approach to biomarker research that facilitates collaborations and hand-offs among technology developers, basic scientists, clinicians, epidemiologists, biostatisticians, and other health professionals. It also expedites efficacious clinical applications of the molecular knowledge that has burgeoned in recent years. The NCI anticipates that EDRN investigators will collaborate with industry both to develop biomarkers and/or reagents and to provide a clinical environment for the evaluation of new technologies. Early interactions with industry leading to research collaborations are likely to benefit both EDRN grantees and industry partners. Many EDRN investigators have or have had active collaborations with the industry. It is hoped that validated biomarkers may ultimately be commercialized into diagnostic products for early detection of cancer and cancer risk assessment. Structured around four main scientific units, the EDRN currently includes 20 BDLs, three BRLs, eight CVCs, and one DMCC.
The EDRN program is established to: (a) promote translational research to identify biomarkers for cancer risk, early detection, and molecular diagnosis and prognosis of early cancer; and (b) coordinate biomarker research within the extramural community and with other NCI programs in cancer prevention, screening, and treatment to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality (see EDRN Strategic Plan, http://edrn.nci.nih.gov/docs). In the future, candidate biomarkers are likely to be discovered by integromic approaches where genomics data will increasingly be integrated with other 'omic' data, such as proteomic, epigenomic, metabolomic, etc., to take advantage of the exponentially growing genomic knowledge of the cancer landscape.
EDRN's specific interests include but are not limited to the following:
- Discover, develop, evaluate, and validate promising 'omic' biomarkers (e.g., genomic, proteomic epigenomic, metabolomic) for effective cancer risk assessment, early detection, and early diagnosis and prognosis of cancer.
- Integrate biomarkers with imaging to reduce the false positive rate of imaging and to improve the detection of clinically significant cancers.
- Develop and validate biomarkers to improve the detection of cancer progression for patients on active surveillance.
- Develop assays for accelerating biomarker discovery and translation into the clinical area. This would include measures of diagnostic or predictive accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and, whenever possible, clinical impact/benefits.
- Develop and implement diagnostic assays in support of the EDRN objectives by using multiple biomarkers, gene expression patterns, post-translational changes, epigenetic changes, and changes in metabolic profiles.
- Facilitate the development of high-throughput, sensitive assay methods to identify and implement biomarkers that are useful in assessing cancer risk, detecting early stage cancers, cancer diagnosis and prognosis.
- Support collaboration among academic and industrial leaders, whose areas of interest are in molecular biology/molecular genetics, clinical oncology, computer science, public health and/or other related areas, leading to the development of cancer diagnostics.
- Conduct clinical/epidemiological studies (e.g., cross-sectional, prospective, retrospective, etc.) in order to evaluate the predictive value of biomarkers.
- Continue to expand the informatics infrastructure to facilitate pre-competitive data sharing on biomarker discovery, development, and validation.
- Serve as a core resource so that NCI and the cancer community at large can leverage the well-developed EDRN infrastructure and expertise in order to facilitate translational cancer research and cancer therapeutic trials.
These goals are achieved through a systematic, evidence-based discovery, development, and validation of biomarkers, based upon Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Common Data Elements (CDEs) developed by the EDRN investigators and described in the EDRN Manual of Operations (http://edrn.nci.nih.gov/docs). The EDRN has established a five-phase approach as a standard and a roadmap for successfully translating research on biomarker applications from the laboratory to the bedside. The five phases for biomarker discovery and validation are:
- Phase 1: The pre-clinical exploratory phase;
- Phase 2: The validation phase (case/control);
- Phase 3: The retrospective longitudinal phase;
- Phase 4: The prospective screening study phase; and
- Phase 5: The cancer control phase.
The EDRN has also proposed a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for biomarker discovery and validation studies for early cancer detection, diagnosis and prognosis, known as the prospective-specimen-collection, retrospective-blinded-evaluation (PRoBE) study design. The PRoBE study design includes four key units, which relate to: 1) the clinical context and outcomes; 2) criteria for measuring biomarker performance; 3) the biomarker itself; and 4) the sample size included in the study. The PRoBE design involves prospectively collected biological specimens from a cohort that represents the target population envisioned for clinical application of the biomarker. Nested case-control studies, as described in the PRoBE design, can improve the quality of discovery research and increase the chances of truly valuable markers to undergo definitive evaluation. The biomarker is assayed in a blinded fashion on the specimens collected prior to and near the time of diagnosis among the case subjects and at similar times in the control subjects in the cohort. Studies using such banked specimens and data collected prior to symptoms or diagnosis are increasingly recognized as precious resources for making comparisons that have strong internal validity. Clinical studies seldom have prediagnostic specimens on most subjects because obtaining them requires following large cohorts of asymptomatic people, ideally at periodic intervals, to ascertain if they develop cancer. One biological explanation as to why prediagnostic and clinical early stage specimens may differ is that acute phase plasma proteins may be increased by inflammatory and other conditions present near the time of symptomatic diagnosis.
The articles on five-phase approach and PRoBE design are provided on the EDRN website (http://edrn.nci.nih.gov/docs).
EDRN Administrative Structure (For Information Only)
EDRN will be structured around the four main scientific units, funded through separate FOAs, to include approximately 12-16 BDLs, 4-5 BRLs, 8-9 CVCs, and one DMCC. Although individual teams of EDRN awardees (BDLs, BRLs, CVCs, and DMCC) will operate independently, they will be required to interact closely with other EDRN awardees and engage in collaborative activities with them.
The EDRN administrative structure is composed of the following:
Steering Committee: The Steering Committee, which includes representatives of the EDRN awardees and the NCI, is the governing body of EDRN that integrates the efforts of all EDRN awardees and provides oversight of collaborative activities. The Chair and co-Chair of the Steering Committee are PDs/PIs of EDRN cooperative agreement awards and are elected by the Steering Committee. Any member of the Steering Committee can offer nominations for the Chair and co-Chair. The co-Chair serves as the Chair of a small subgroup of the Steering Committee, the Executive Committee. Other members of the Executive Committee include the leading PD/PI of the DMCC, a representative PD/PI of BRLs, the NCI Project Coordinator, and the Chairs of the EDRN Collaborative Groups. The latter are based on organ site and EDRN PDs/PIs can be members of one or more Collaborative Groups.
Assisted by the Executive Committee and NCI Program staff, duties of the Chair of the Steering Committee include:
- Preside at all meetings of the Steering Committee;
- Appoint and re-appoint members of Subcommittees, Review Groups, and designate special assignments;
- Appoint ad hoc committees as needed;
- Invite consultants as needed to Subcommittees, etc.;
- Appoint EDRN liaison members to other organizations;
- Serve as an ex-officio member of all Subcommittees, ad hoc Committees, and Task Forces;
- Submit annual EDRN Progress Reports to NCI and the Network Consulting Team.
Further details of Steering Committee composition and responsibilities are provided in Section VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions.
Headquarters: The institution of the Chair of the Steering Committee serves as the Headquarters of the EDRN. The Headquarters serve as a center for dissemination of information to investigators and institutions in EDRN, as well as to those outside the Network. The Chair serves as the PD/PI of the Headquarters and oversees the implementation of the scientific, operational, and organizational policies of the Network.
Core Fund: The EDRN will have a restricted Core Fund that will be made available to support post-award collaborative research projects, validation of new biomarkers, expansion of the EDRN portfolio, and making the Network inclusive by supporting non-EDRN investigators. Since the Core Fund is restricted and reserved for post-award activities, no requests for Core Fund support can be made in the application in response to this FOA.
The management of the EDRN Core Fund will be a responsibility of the DMCC and will be restricted via a term of award pending review of proposed projects by the EDRN Steering Committee and NCI approval of the projects. The solicitation of requests for use of Core Fund and the organization of their review will be the responsibility of the Steering Committee. The procedure for selecting activities and releasing the funds will involve the following steps: EDRN-affiliated investigators as well as non-EDRN investigators will be able to request Core Fund support for specific collaborative activities relevant to the EDRN goals. The Steering Committee will assign these requests for review to PDs/PIs from appropriate EDRN Collaborative Groups with the assistance of external reviewers as needed. Final review and selection of requests to be recommended for funding will be conducted by the Executive Committee. Following these recommendations and the NCI approval of funds release, the DMCC will distribute the approved funds under appropriate sub-award agreements.
In the past, $2-5 million was allotted to the Core Fund and was contingent upon the availability of funds. In the new EDRN funding cycle, it is anticipated that a similar amount will be set aside for the Core Fund.
Network Consulting Team: The Network Consulting Team is composed of a Chair and non-EDRN members appointed by NCI. The Network Consulting Team reviews the progress of the EDRN, recommends new research initiatives, and ensures that the Network is responsive to promising opportunities in early detection research and risk assessment. The Network Consulting Team can recommend new research projects to the Steering Committee or to NCI. Members of the Network Consulting Team can serve on ad hoc Committees of the EDRN, internal Review Groups, and as consultants to subcommittees.
Specific Research Objectives and Requirements
Scope: This FOA encourages the submission of applications in broad categories of biomarker discovery derived from complex cellular pathways, processes, and networks to identify the molecular and cellular signatures of cells, which can be used for risk assessment, detection, and molecular diagnosis and prognosis of early cancer. Use of integromic approaches, systems biology approaches, and/or signaling pathway analyses to identify biomarkers that not only predict onset of a certain cancer but also delineate the specific biochemical, cellular, and physiological characteristics associated with a particular neoplasia is desirable and encouraged. Use of information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), high throughput sequencing technologies and other molecular approaches to understand what types of molecular properties confer aggressiveness to some pre-neoplastic lesions, define and characterize pre-neoplastic lesions in order to improve current standards in histology and cytology, and more accurately predict tumor behavior at the tissue, cellular or molecular level is encouraged. Applicants can propose to utilize bodily fluids, readily available biopsy or tissue specimens procurable through minimally invasive technologies, circulating nucleic acids or cells, and other media as appropriate to the proposed study.
Examples of specific research areas include but are not limited to:
- Effectively delineate disease phenotypes or pre-cancerous lesions involving molecular abnormalities in many biological processes.
- Discover and develop promising 'omic' biomarkers (e.g., genomic, proteomic, epigenomic, metabolomic) for identification of cancer risk, early detection, and early diagnosis and prognosis of cancer.
- Identify secreted proteins, membrane-associated proteins, and/or protein profiles that correlate with the presence of pre-cancerous and cancerous lesions.
- Identify and evaluate biochemical, genetic, epigenetic, and/or cytological markers of risk of cancer development and/or progression.
- Develop new serum- and tissue-related biomarker tests for early detection and diagnosis in order to identify clinically significant cancers and predictions of clinical outcomes, with or without conventional tissue examination.
- Integrate the genetic, cell signaling, and biochemical pathways into biomarker discovery strategies to have a broader applicability across different tumor types. Determine the potential of novel network- and pathway-based markers to detect and diagnose cancer.
- Determine genes, proteins, cellular and/or subcellular features, and other molecules or molecular signatures that correlate with the presence of pre-cancerous and cancerous lesions or for risk assessment.
Types of Cancer: Applications for research on cancers of common occurrence (e.g., those of the prostate, breast, colon, and lung) are encouraged. Proposed studies may also focus on other cancers that are major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality (e.g., those of the ovary, pancreas, liver, esophagus, and stomach).
Non-responsive Applications: This FOA will not support research on mechanistic studies, such as studies on growth regulation, cell cycle control, or other basic studies, which are not explicitly focused on risk assessment, on early cancer detection, and on molecular diagnosis and prognosis of early cancer in humans. Applications using “convenience samples” (i.e., samples to be used were not collected based on SOPs and/or the intended clinical use of the biomarkers to be developed and not in compliance with the PRoBE or a similar study design for minimizing bias) will also be considered non-responsive. Non-responsive applications will not proceed to review.
Note: NCI will hold a pre-application informational webinar for this FOA. Date, time, and other details will be posted at http://edrn.nci.nih.gov/.
Cooperative Agreement: A support mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities.
Application Types Allowed
The OER Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types.
Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards
The NCI expects to commit $8 million in FY2015 to fund up to 16 BDL awards.
A budget of up to $400,000 per year (direct costs) may be requested. The indicated budget limit may be appropriate for larger projects involving multiple laboratories (and possibly multiple PD(s)/PI(s)). Smaller projects (e.g., involving one PD/PI and a single laboratory) are expected not to exceed $250,000 per year (direct costs).
Application budgets need to reflect the actual needs of the proposed project.
Award Project Period
An applicant may request a project period of up to 5 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.
1. Eligible Applicants
Higher Education Institutions
- Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education
- Private Institutions of Higher Education
The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:
- Hispanic-serving Institutions
- Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)
- Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs)
- Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions
- Asian American Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institutions (AANAPISIs)
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
- Nonprofits with 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education)
- Nonprofits without 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education)
- Small Businesses
- For-Profit Organizations (Other than Small Businesses)
- State Governments
- Eligible Agencies of the Federal Governments
- U.S. Territory or Possession
- Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. The NIH Policy on Late Submission of Grant Applications states that failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission.
- Dun and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) - All registrations require that applicants be issued a DUNS number. After obtaining a DUNS number, applicants can begin both SAM and eRA Commons registrations. The same DUNS number must be used for all registrations, as well as on the grant application.
- System for Award Management (SAM) (formerly CCR) – Applicants must complete and maintain an active registration, which requires renewal at least annually. The renewal process may require as much time as the initial registration. SAM registration includes the assignment of a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code for domestic organizations which have not already been assigned a CAGE Code.
- NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code – Foreign organizations must obtain an NCAGE code (in lieu of a CAGE code) in order to register in SAM.
- eRA Commons - Applicants must have an active DUNS number and SAM registration in order to complete the eRA Commons registration. Organizations can register with the eRA Commons as they are working through their SAM or Grants.gov registration. eRA Commons requires organizations to identify at least one Signing Official (SO) and at least one Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) account in order to submit an application.
- Grants.gov – Applicants must have an active DUNS number and SAM registration in order to complete the Grants.gov registration.
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Eligible Individuals (Program Director/Principal Investigator)
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with his/her organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
A proposed PD/PI may not serve as a contact PD/PI on more than one application submitted in response to this FOA.
2. Cost Sharing
This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Number of Applications
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time. This means that the NIH will not accept:
- A new (A0) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of an overlapping new (A0) or resubmission (A1) application.
- A resubmission (A1) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application.
- An application that has substantial overlap with another application pending appeal of initial peer review (see NOT-OD-11-101).
In addition, the NIH will not accept a resubmission (A1) application that is submitted later than 37 months after submission of the new (A0) application that it follows. The NIH will accept submission:
- To an RFA of an application that was submitted previously as an investigator-initiated application but not paid;
- Of an investigator-initiated application that was originally submitted to an RFA but not paid; or
- Of an application with a changed grant activity code.
1. Requesting an Application Package
Applicants must download the SF424 (R&R) application package associated with this funding opportunity using the “Apply for Grant Electronically” button in this FOA or following the directions provided at Grants.gov.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, including Supplemental Grant Application Instructions except where instructed in this funding opportunity announcement to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
For information on Application Submission and Receipt, visit Frequently Asked Questions – Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.
Letter of Intent
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
By the date listed in Part 1. Overview Information, prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
- Descriptive title of proposed activity
- Name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of the PD(s)/PI(s)
- Names of other key personnel
- Participating institution(s)
- Number and title of this funding opportunity
The letter of intent should be sent to:
Sudhir Srivastava, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Chief, Cancer Biomarkers Research Group
Division of Cancer Prevention
National Cancer Institute
9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 5E136, MSC 9790
Bethesda, MD 20892-9790 (for USPS Regular or Express delivery)
Rockville, MD 20850 (for non-USPS delivery)
All page limitations described in the SF424 Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed, with the following exceptions or additional requirements:
- For this specific FOA, the Research Strategy must not exceed 30 pages.
Instructions for Application Submission
The following section supplements the instructions found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this FOA.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
SF424(R&R) Other Project Information
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed. Additional instructions are defined below.
Facilities & Other Resources: In addition, applicants must describe the following:
- The specialized or unique facilities, core resources, and services each team member will provide towards achieving the objectives of the proposed studies.
- The PD/PI should not rely on core facilities of their institute as the primary resource to enable biomarker discovery – these resources must be within the laboratory under direct oversight of the PD/PI.
- Any relevant ongoing institutional, and/or private sector support and resources that augment or complement resources for which funding from this FOA is sought.
Other Attachments: Applicants should provide additional supporting materials relevant to the research for which funding from this FOA is sought in the categories defined below. Upload these materials as individual pdf files using the indicated file names (these file names will become bookmarks in the application).
- Filename: "Biomarker Tables": Provide in a tabular form the comprehensive lists of biomarkers investigated in current EDRN project period (for renewals) or in preliminary studies (for new applicants).
- Filename "Certifications": Provide documentation for the relevant certifications such as: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) etc..
- Filename "Patents": List patents that are relevant to the proposed study and are owned or licensed by the institutions of the PD(s)/PI(s) or other participating investigators. For all unpublished patents and patent applications, include their abstracts. For publically accessible patents, list the corresponding patent numbers/identifiers.
SF424(R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed. All Key Personnel must provide a detailed description of their expertise that is relevant to the proposed studies.
In addition, the following specific requirements must be addressed:
- Every Team should have access to a pathologist to provide expertise in specifying characteristics of the disease encountered in the clinical specimens being tested by this Team.
- Every Team should have involvement of a clinical epidemiologist (or a biostatistician with appropriate clinical epidemiology expertise in research design) to understand and apply principles of the PRoBE study design approach in biomarker pre-validation and validation studies, to help assure strength of results between the compared groups.
- Every Team should designate a Project Manager with whom NCI Program staff or other Network participants can communicate regarding various details and activities of the study. Usually, the Project Manager will be the Team Leader; however, another person can be specified to fulfill this role.
R&R or Modular Budget
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
The following additional instructions apply:
a) The contact PD/PI must commit a minimum of 1.8 person-months effort per year to the U01 application and award. This commitment cannot be reduced in later years of the award. For multiple PD/PI applications, the other PD(s)/PI(s) must devote a minimum of 1.2 person months effort per year to their respective projects.
b) Applicants must set aside 30 percent of their annual budget for Network collaborative studies as follows:
- The competing renewal applicant should set aside funds from the first year onward; and
- The new applicant should set aside funds from the second year onward.
The use of the set-aside funds will be restricted for collaborative studies proposed post-award and must be reviewed by the Steering Committee. The release of these funds from individual U01 awards will be contingent upon the advice of the EDRN Executive Committee and authorization by the NCI. The amount should be presented in the Other Expenses category under the heading “Network Collaborative Funds.”
c) Applicants must budget for travel and per diem expenses for Steering Committee meetings. In the first year, applicants should plan for at least two senior investigators (all PDs/PIs, if desirable, or the PD/PI and a senior investigator if multi-PDs/PIs option is not used), to attend a Planning Meeting and two Steering Committee meetings. In the second and subsequent years, applicants should plan for at least two senior investigators (all PDs/PIs, if desirable, or the PD/PI and a senior investigator if multi-PDs/PIs option is not used) to attend two Steering Committee meetings per year and an EDRN Scientific Workshop every 18 months (this usually coincides with one of the Steering Committee meetings).
R&R Subaward Budget
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Specific Aims: In addition to a brief description of the specific aims and approach(es) to be employed, applicants must outline the scope of the proposed research and its relevance to a specific unmet clinical need in the management of human malignancies.
Sub-section A: Overview
Outline the overall research theme of the proposed BDL, as well as the Significance and Innovation of the proposed study in the context of a specific unmet clinical need. Define clearly the clinical endpoint (outcome or condition the biomarker is to classify). Describe the overall translational potential and relevance of the proposed studies to the early detection of cancer. Explain how the proposed research will enhance existing biomarker detection systems or methodologies.
To address how the BDL will ensure the complementary multidisciplinary scientific expertise required for integrated and comprehensive approaches to the key research problems proposed, address the following aspects.
- Provide full details of the proposed Team structure and explain how specific expertise of each member of the Team contribute to achieving the objectives of the proposed studies. Applicants are encouraged to highlight how the diverse expertise of the Team members contributes to the innovation of which the Team is capable, the flexibility they possess to redirect research when scientific progress warrants it, and their ability to anticipate new directions, based on their individual experience and ability to contribute to a collective effort. Provide evidence of previous successful collaborations among members of the applicant team.
- Describe any relevant partnerships and/or collaborations with the for-profit private sector, if applicable. For EDRN-related public-private partnerships, please visit the EDRN website at http://edrn.nci.nih.gov. Industrial scientists or collaborators can provide valuable expertise, reagents and technology for biomarker discovery. EDRN encourages pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to participate in Network-sponsored studies for moving biomarkers through qualification for an FDA-approved clinical use. Applicants are encouraged to develop collaboration with industry or diagnostic companies to share precompetitive data on their proposed research to avoid competition and foster complementation. In structuring such partnerships or collaborations, take into account pre-existing intellectual property rights associated with the use of existing models/reagents and make appropriate licensing arrangements. List and summarize each of the agreements with industry collaborators, including a description of the materials, technologies and/or expertise to be provided by such collaborators. NCI will serve as a concierge to facilitate partnership with relevant laboratories and centers within EDRN. Applicants and their technology licensing offices are encouraged to seek assistance as needed from the NCI Technology Transfer Branch (http://ttc.nci.nih.gov/) in determining whether such arrangements are appropriate and/or adequate. Detailed documentation of license agreement(s), intellectual property arrangements, and data sharing concerning the proposed or existing collaboration with industrial partner(s) will be expected as appropriate if an applicant is selected for consideration for funding. The applicant institution's technology transfer office should be involved in reviewing such documents for the applicant institution prior to submission.
- Highlight, whenever applicable, the collaborative aspects in the study with justifications as to why collaboration is needed and how this collaboration would add value to the proposed study. Describe plans for any future collaboration for the proposed EDRN biomarker studies, both within and outside the Network. For new applications, applicants should describe their experience in collaborative programs and activities with academic and industry partners. Examples of collaborations that may be provided in support of the application include demonstrated evidence of:
- Collaborative projects and publications;
- Collaborative funding; and
- Sharing of data and resources, e.g., specimens, technologies, and study protocols.
Sub-section B: Previous Accomplishments
Relevant Recent Accomplishments (all applications): Applicants must provide a brief description of previous research accomplishments/preliminary studies on which the team builds the proposed biomarker development activities. .
Progress Report (renewal applications only): Include additional information in this section summarizing the current 5-year funding period and include the following items (a-d):
a) List the specific aims from your previously funded application. Describe the progress made relevant to these specific aims, and indicate the status of developed markers according to the EDRN-defined biomarker phases. Applicants should highlight their progress using the EDRN-developed Evaluation Metrics as described in the EDRN Manual of Operations (http://edrn.nci.nih.gov/docs).
b) Describe the progress made on biomarker research supported by other EDRN funding sources such as projects funded through the restricted set-aside funds or the EDRN Core Fund. If the applicant has participated in any Network-wide validation studies or other projects supported by the EDRN Core Fund, elaborate on the role(s) played and the contribution(s) made to the outcome of the studies.
c) Highlight the key findings for the biomarkers investigated during the current funding period that have progressed in terms of the EDRN-defined phases for validation. What steps have been taken to advance biomarkers beyond the discovery and development stage to pre-validation or to Phase 2/Phase 3 clinical validation? For any unsuccessful discovery efforts, describe the alternative approaches that can be taken in the present application to be more effective. For biomarkers that have been eliminated from further investigation, briefly explain the reasons for that decision.
d) Provide a synopsis of the reviews from the latest site visit by NCI Program staff and external consultants and describe steps taken to address any concerns in these reviews.
Note: Supplementary data for this sub-section are requested under "Other Attachments" in Section IV.2. Content and Form of Application Submission.
Sub-section C: Research Project
Define the major clinical question(s) to be addressed by the proposed project. Outline its rationale and significance as they relate to the objectives of the EDRN and on the basis of existing scientific evidence derived from epidemiologic, model systems or clinical studies. The focus of the proposed translational studies is expected to be on the discovery, development, characterization, and testing of biomarkers of cancer risk and/or early cancer. The development of diagnostic and/or prognostic markers may also be proposed, provided that: (a) the selection is sufficiently justified and reflects urgent clinical needs. Include a detailed description of the target population and clinical setting in accordance with the intended clinical endpoint of the biomarkers proposed to be developed; and (b) the effort proposed is part of the overall strategy to improve early detection and risk assessment. In the context of this FOA, development will encompass further studies to evaluate and validate promising candidate biomarkers identified by applicants themselves or by other investigators in accordance with EDRN-defined Phases 2 and 3 of the biomarker development approach. Applicants must describe the study design and approaches to be followed for the proposed studies.
Examples that illustrate the types of translational biomarker studies include but are not limited to the following:
- Development of molecularly-informed biomarkers or biomarker panels (e.g., based on the identification of novel genetic aberrations, changes in genomic/proteomic/metabolomic profiles, post-translational modifications of proteins, epigenetic changes) in tissues and bodily fluids (including serum/plasma, sputum, urine, and/or pancreatic juice) that are associated with cancer development in order to, for example, identify pre-cancerous and cancerous lesions, assess risk of cancer development and/or progression, develop new serum- and tissue-based biomarker tests, and identify network- and pathway-based markers.
- Development of biomarkers in preclinical specimens to discern which screen-detected lesions are aggressive and likely to cause significant morbidity and death from the ones that are indolent or slow-growing to reduce the burden of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
- Identification and evaluation of molecular and genomic profiles for risk stratification by improving pathological classification of early lesions. Expansion of marker identification to predict onset of disease and risk of recurrence in order to:
- Develop molecular markers that can augment or replace tissue-based assays; and
- Develop markers that improve current methods or modalities of detection.
- Development of biomarkers to detect molecular alterations in circulating nucleic acids or exfoliated cells in bodily fluids, including serum/plasma, urine, stool, sputum, and/or saliva, in order to:
- Develop reagents to detect cancer-specific signatures that may signal the presence of small numbers of pre-malignant and malignant cells.
- Development of highly specific and sensitive markers to detect molecular products of tumor cells, including exosomes in bodily fluids with emphasis on the identification of molecular determinants in accessible surrogate anatomic sites for the less accessible major cancer sites.
- Study of molecular signatures to identify risk of and early stage disease due to infectious agents, pathogens, and other environmental agents.
- Development of subcellular imaging biomarkers in tandem with molecular markers to interrogate the dynamic modulation of cancer progression correlated with results derived from clinical trials. Exploitation of these technologies could lead to biomarkers applicable to prognosis or targeted therapy.
- Study to improve cancer detection by proposing to integrate image-based diagnosis with innovations in molecular biology, genomics, proteomics and immunology.
Other approaches for the development of biomarkers for early detection, diagnosis, prognosis or assessment of cancer risk will be accepted as well.
Applicants should propose their discovery studies based on the EDRN-established Phase 1 and Phase 2 biomarker development guidelines and PRoBE (http://edrn.nci.nih.gov/docs) or similar study design criteria to avoid bias and make best use of available resources. This will strengthen “discovery” research and increase the likelihood of reproducibility of results.
In addition, a clear statement is required on how statistical power is defined in multiple tests and what sample size is required to achieve this power. Examples of power definition: (a) the probability to detect at least one of possible true non-zero effects; (b) the probability to detect all non-zero effects; and (c) true discovery rate, etc. Also, in case-control designs, clear descriptions are required of whether matching is involved and what cofounders are adjusted for and why.
The applicant is required, if applicable to their proposed research, to address the following in the proposed study:
- Whether the applicant has resources or access to resources for sample acquisition. Samples must be collected under rigorous standard operating procedures in compliance with PRoBE study design criteria.
- Specify features of specimen collection (e.g., study design and conduct) used to minimize bias between compared groups of cancer vs. non-cancer and to assure validity of study results (e.g., using principles defined by the PRoBE study design). By taking into account the clinical question to be addressed, the investigator may anticipate which details of study design and protocol are important to be considered.
- Studies encompassing preclinical samples and early stage disease are encouraged to rule out inflammatory or other acute reactant markers that may be present near the time of clinical sample collection.
- If proposing sample acquisitions from cohort consortia, NCI's National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN), Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) etc., it is expected that the custodian or authorized PD/PI of the cohort will be an active participant on the proposed studies. A letter of support alone will not suffice.
Sub-section D: Project Management Plan
The following three major requirements must be addressed:
a) A tentative timeline for conducting the proposed studies, with brief descriptions of how the goals of each of the proposed specific aims will be achieved on a year-by-year basis by providing tentative, interim milestones. In addition, the applicants should clearly delineate the time-line for transition of biomarkers from Phase 1 to Phase 2, and to Phase 3 validation.
b) Overall Project Milestones, which must be well described, quantitative, and scientifically justified. Discuss the milestones as a means of judging the success of the proposed studies during the initial 3 years of support by the U01 award. Specific aims may not be regarded as milestones (unless they include quantitative end points). The specific aims describe the goals and intended path of the proposed research. Quantitative milestones are a way of determining whether an applicant has successfully reached the specified goals. Generally, applicants are expected to provide milestones for each specific aim. Milestones should be clearly stated and presented in a quantitative manner, such as numerical specifications of sensitivity and specificity or a count of some newly discovered molecules or molecular pattern(s) that can be used as biomarkers for early cancer detection, risk assessment, diagnosis or prognosis of cancer.
Examples of quantitative milestones are listed below:
- Detection of one cancer cell in 106 normal blood cells;
- Conduct three consecutive screening cycles to refine the search for identifying the top 10 most specific proteins [DNAs, mRNAs, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), metabolites, etc.] associated with early stage pancreatic cancer;
- Identification of 10 new lung cancer-associated mRNAs;
- Phase 2 prevalidation of proteins “x, y, and z” as promising biomarkers to detect ovarian cancer in blood (plasma or serum), e.g., building and testing of a classifier model from a marker set with observed specificity of at least 95% among 100 cases and 300 benign pelvic mass controls.
Any application lacking acceptable milestones will be considered incomplete.
c) Applicants should also elaborate on a decision-tree scheme to be used during biomarker developmental studies for triaging biomarker candidates, as well as the criteria based on which specific biomarkers should continue to be pursued [‘go’ or ‘no go’ decision]. Should certain promising biomarkers be dropped at any stage during development, alternative steps or strategies to be followed must also be described.
Shortly before completion of the third year of award, the progress made towards these milestones will be reviewed by a site visit of the laboratory by Program staff members and external expert consultants. A decision by NCI will be made at that time based on the comments from the site visit review team as to whether or not funding for this BDL should continue for the remaining period of the 5-year term.
Multiple PD/PI Leadership Plan: In addition to following standard instructions, applicants should explain how the multiple PDs/PIs will divide their scientific responsibilities in terms of focus on different platforms for biomarker discovery and development. In this context, it is expected that each PD/PI will be responsible for a different platform (although overlap in types of tumors of focus across PDs/PIs is acceptable).
Letters of Support: In addition to standard items, provide:
- Letters of commitment for resources and/or technology made available by industry partners involved in the proposed research.
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans (Data Sharing Plan, Sharing Model Organisms, and Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS)) as provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide with the following modifications.
All applications, regardless of the amount of direct costs requested for any one year, should address a Resource and Data Sharing Plan.
In addition to the standard NIH rules, the following EDRN-specific expectations apply:
(a) Specimen Sharing: The success of EDRN is dependent on collaborative interactions of all its laboratories. Clinical specimen collections funded through EDRN cooperative agreements must become available to all investigators in the Network and must be made available for Network validation studies. Applicants seeking to use funding via this U01 mechanism to collect clinical specimens must state their willingness to share these samples with others in the Network.
(b) Intellectual Property: Collaboration among EDRN investigators, as well as between Network investigators and third-party industry partners is a core mission of the EDRN, which entails the sharing of intellectual property arising out of research resources developed in Network-related activities.
Applicants are expected to submit an Intellectual Property Management Plan (IPMP) in line with the accepted IP Rights and Responsibilities (http://edrn.nci.nih.gov/docs). The proposed plan should address the strategy to be followed for both solely or jointly owned inventions (including patents and licensing issues) and how these resources will be made available to the broader scientific community, consistent with the EDRN initiative. Any approved IPMP will become a condition of the award.
Appendix: Do not use the Appendix to circumvent page limits. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
Planned Enrollment Report
When conducting clinical research, follow all instructions for completing Planned Enrollment Reports as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
PHS 398 Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment Report
When conducting clinical research, follow all instructions for completing Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment Report as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
Foreign (non-U.S.) institutions must follow policies described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, and procedures for foreign institutions described throughout the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
3. Submission Dates and Times
Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
4. Intergovernmental Review (E.O. 12372)
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
6. Other Submission Requirements and Information
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit Applying Electronically.
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the SF424(R&R) Application Package. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this FOA for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by NCI, NIH. Applications that are incomplete and/or non-responsive will not be reviewed.
Post Submission Materials
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in NOT-OD-13-030.
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. As part of the NIH mission, all applications submitted to the NIH in support of biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Scored Review Criteria
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?
In addition, specific to this FOA: Is the clinical endpoint (outcome or condition the biomarker is to classify) clearly defined? How significant would be the proposed research in terms of complementing or augmenting existing biomarker detection systems or methodologies? What is the likelihood that this research during the next five years will succeed in moving biomarkers to Phase 2 or Phase 3 in light of the EDRN-established phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer? What is the likelihood that the proposed study will lead to a potentially routine use of a new biomarker in clinical practice?
Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, or in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project?
In addition, specific to this FOA: Has the applicant team demonstrated sufficient training and expertise in the biology of biomarker discovery and the use of proposed technology platforms?
Does this team of investigators show a significant measure of success in experimental approaches to biomarker discovery and development? Will this team of investigators contribute unique capabilities to the trans-Network activities? Is the commitment of the PD(s)/PI(s) and other key investigators in line with the scope of the proposed project? Is there evidence that different PDs/PIs and co-investigators have effectively worked together in the past? Are the investigators likely to participate in EDRN collaborative projects?
Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?
Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed?
In addition, specific to this FOA: Can the proposed approaches be used to derive biomarkers/reagents for a variety of malignant tumors? Are the target population and clinical setting for the intended use of the biomarker clearly defined? Has the applicant provided documentation as to the source of high quality, clinically-annotated preclinical and clinical specimens for the proposed discovery research? Are the samples to be used in the proposed study appropriate for the requirements of the PRoBE study design or a similar design? Has the applicant provided adequate scientific evidence from epidemiologic, model systems (cell culture, animal models) or clinical studies warranting success of the proposed study? Are parameters, such as sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value, chosen to characterize the biomarkers/reagents sufficient and appropriate? Are the study designs supported by adequate sample size and statistical reasoning? Is it clear how statistical power is determined in the context of multiple tests and the sample size that would be required to achieve this power? Are considerations given to minimize bias, chance, overfitting, and reproducibility issues in the proposed study design? Is it clear how the marker performance will be evaluated? How well does the applicant understand the nuances of biomarker discovery and address the problems/challenges in data reproducibility and quality of discovery in selecting appropriate specimens and for data analysis?
If the project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, are the plans to address 1) the protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion or exclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?
Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?
In addition, specific to this FOA: Are the primary resources for the proposed study within the laboratory under the direct oversight of the PD(s)/PI(s)?
Additional Review Criteria
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Are the proposed collaborations scientifically justified? Are the roles of collaborating units clearly defined and appropriate for the proposed goals? If applicable, how meaningful is the industry participation? Are there adequate plans and commitments for effective interactions and effort coordination with other Network units, the Steering Committee, the DMCC, and the NCI?
Project Management Plan
Are the proposed project management plan and study time-line acceptable? Are the proposed milestones quantitative and in line with the proposed research? Is there a decision-tree scheme for the biomarker developmental study to determine the stages at which specific biomarkers should continue to be pursued or whether to triage any biomarkers? Are the criteria used to make these decisions specified or the alternative steps that will be taken should certain biomarkers be dropped at any stage defined?
Protections for Human Subjects
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion (or exclusion) of children to determine if it is justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following five points: 1) proposed use of the animals, and species, strains, ages, sex, and numbers to be used; 2) justifications for the use of animals and for the appropriateness of the species and numbers proposed; 3) adequacy of veterinary care; 4) procedures for limiting discomfort, distress, pain and injury to that which is unavoidable in the conduct of scientifically sound research including the use of analgesic, anesthetic, and tranquilizing drugs and/or comfortable restraining devices; and 5) methods of euthanasia and reason for selection if not consistent with the AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animal Section.
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
For Renewals, the committee will consider the progress made in the current funding period. The following aspects will be evaluated:
Given the past accomplishments, what is the likelihood that the applicant team will be successful in developing viable clinical biomarker candidates? Did the applicants undertake and complete the biomarker development projects proposed in the previous application or supported with set-aside/Core funds? Have the applicants developed any biomarkers that have been tested or are currently being tested in prevalidation or validation studies? Did the PD(s)/PI(s) participate in EDRN Steering Committee meetings, workshops and other collaborative activities? Is the review from site visit conducted by NCI program staff members and external consultants described as positive and have the applicants addressed any concerns identified by the reviewers?
Additional Review Considerations
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Applications from Foreign Organizations
Reviewers will assess whether the project presents special opportunities for furthering research programs through the use of unusual talent, resources, populations, or environmental conditions that exist in other countries and either are not readily available in the United States or augment existing U.S. resources.
Select Agent Research
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Resource Sharing Plans
Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable: 1) Data Sharing Plan; 2) Sharing Model Organisms; and 3) Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS)
Intellectual Property Management Plan: Reviewers will comment, as appropriate, on the adequacy and feasibility of the sharing of research resources plan and the Intellectual Property Management Plan (IPMP). Comments on the plans and any concerns will be presented in an administrative note in the Summary Statement. NCI Program staff will consider the adequacy of the plans in determining whether to recommend an application for award.
Budget and Period of Support
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
2. Review and Selection Process
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by the NCI, in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications:
- May undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
- Will receive a written critique.
Appeals of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this FOA.
Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this FOA. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Cancer Advisory Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
- Scientific and technical merit of the proposed project as determined by scientific peer review.
- Availability of funds.
- Relevance of the proposed project to program priorities. This aspect will include the adequacy of the Intellectual Property Management Plan.
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
1. Award Notices
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization for successful applications. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via email to the grantee’s business official.
Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs.
Any application awarded in response to this FOA will be subject to terms and conditions found on the Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants website. This includes any recent legislation and policy applicable to awards that is highlighted on this website.
The award will also include a restricted Network Collaborative Fund that will be used to support research collaboration between the awardee and other EDRN units as recommended by the EDRN Steering Committee and approved by the NCI.
All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities. More information is provided at Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants.
Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award
The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS grant administration regulations at 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92 (Part 92 is applicable when State and local Governments are eligible to apply), and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the awardees is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the awardees for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the awardees and the NIH as defined below.
The PD(s)/PI(s) will have the primary responsibility for:
- Defining the scientific objectives and approaches for the individual BDL, including research design and study protocol development, if applicable, participant recruitment and follow-up, data collection, quality control, and interim data and safety monitoring, and to plan, conduct, analyze, and publish results;
- Accountability to the applicant organization officials and to the NCI for the performance and the proper conduct of the research supported by the U01 mechanism in accordance with the terms and conditions that are stated in this FOA;
- Participating in and being a voting member of the Steering Committee. In accordance with this cooperative agreement, the PD/PI together with an additional senior investigator (or two PD(s)/PI(s) for multi-PD/PI awards), will attend a Planning Meeting and two Steering Committee meetings in the first year, two Steering Committee meetings in each of the subsequent years of the award, and one EDRN-sponsored scientific workshop every 18 months (this usually coincides with one of the Steering Committee meetings);
- Accepting and implementing the goals, priorities, procedures, and policies agreed upon by the Steering Committee to the extent consistent with applicable grant regulations;
- Coordinating the BDL's efforts within EDRN and cooperating with the other units of the Network and with NCI staff members;
- Overseeing the implementation of the approved data sharing plan;
- Ensuring that experimental data and their format, analytical algorithms, computational modeling and visualizations, and other bioinformatics tools resulting from this FOA are compatible with the NIH-approved bioinformatics platforms, such as those designed and implemented by the NCI Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology (CBIIT; http://cbiit.nci.nih.gov/);
- In addition to these responsibilities and obligations, the PD(s)/PI(s) and their awardee institutions will be accountable for implementing the approved research resource sharing plan;
- All institutions/organizations participating in a given BDL will be expected to share with each other knowledge, data, research materials, and any other resources necessary and relevant to the EDRN BDL award;
- Each BDL and the entire EDRN program will be subject to external evaluation (coordinated by the NIH). EDRN Awardees will be expected to participate in such evaluations;
- Awardees will retain custody of and have primary rights to the data and software developed under these awards, subject to Government rights of access consistent with current HHS, PHS, and NIH policies;
- The PD(s)/PI(s) will be required to partner with at least one CVC for obtaining clinical or preclinical specimens for biomarker discovery or testing.
PD(s)/PI(s) Responsibilities for Network Collaborative Studies:
- Collaborate with CVCs and other EDRN units to advance promising biomarkers towards EDRN validation studies;
- Accept and implement the goals, priorities, common study protocols, procedures, and policies agreed upon by the Steering Committee for the individual and Network collaborative studies to the extent consistent with grant regulations;
- Ensure Network and NCI review and approval of study protocols, concepts, final protocol documents, informed consents, and study amendments, and advise NCI of changes in study protocol status;
- Collaborate on common study designs or protocols, including methods and requirements for joint participation and collaboration as recommended by the Steering Committee, and handling of data, including appropriate sharing of methods and data among collaborating organizations;
- Accrue subjects on collaborative studies approved by the Steering Committee. Awardees will be expected to submit information on specimen collections per the Network’s Common Data Elements (CDEs) and register their study protocols with the DMCC; and
- Advise any collaborating investigators outside of EDRN that their institutions will also need to agree to be subject to the EDRN resource sharing and intellectual property requirements.
NIH staff will have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below:
A designated NCI Program staff member serving as Project Coordinator will have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below. Additional NCI staff members may also become substantially involved as needed.
Main NCI responsibilities include the following:
- Coordinating and facilitating various activities of the EDRN program;
- Participating in the activities of the EDRN Steering Committee;
- Serving as a liaison between the Steering Committee, the EDRN awardees, and the NIH;
- Ensuring that there are effective mechanisms to enable electronic communication among the Network units, and between the EDRN and the NCI. The NCI Project Coordinator will oversee this in coordination with the NCI CBIIT;
- Assisting the Steering Committee in developing and drafting operating policies and policies for dealing with recurring situations that require coordinated action;
- Assisting the investigators in avoiding unwarranted duplications of effort across the Network;
- Co-organizing and participating in the EDRN-sponsored meetings;
- Monitoring the scientific progress of individual U01/U24 awards and the entire EDRN program; and
- Reviewing the compliance of EDRN awardees with the recommendations developed by the Steering Committee; and coordinating external evaluation of the Network.
- Authorizing the use of funds from the EDRN Core Fund and individual set-aside funds for activities reviewed and recommended by the Steering Committee.
The NCI reserves the right to adjust funding, withhold, suspend, or terminate the support to those Network awardee institutions that are unable to meet the performance requirements set forth in these Terms and Conditions of Award, or significantly change the level of performance.
Additionally, an NCI Program Director acting as Program Official will be responsible for the normal scientific and programmatic stewardship of the award and will be named in the award notice. Program Officials may also have substantial programmatic involvement (as Project Scientists).
Areas of Joint Responsibility Include:
Steering Committee: The EDRN Steering Committee will convene after all the Network units have been funded and will be composed of the following voting members:
- All PD(s)/PI(s) representing each EDRN U01/U24 award; and
- The NCI-designated Project Coordinator.
Each voting member will have one vote.
Additional NIH staff may participate in Steering Committee meetings as non-voting members as needed (for example to provide additional expertise). The non-voting members may include representatives from NCI extramural divisions and a representative from the NCI CBIIT.
Additional non-voting members may participate on the Steering Committee in an advisory capacity on an as needed basis and decided by the existing voting committee members.
The Chair of the Steering Committee (who cannot be NIH staff) will be selected by the Steering Committee. The awardee institution represented by the Chair of the Steering Committee will serve as the Headquarters (for definition, see Section I. Funding Opportunity Description. EDRN Administrative Structure).
The Steering Committee will meet twice every year, at locations selected by the Steering Committee in consultation with the NCI.
The Steering Committee may establish subcommittees for specific purposes. The NCI Project Coordinator/Scientists will serve on such subcommittees, as appropriate.
Primary responsibilities of the Steering Committee include, but are not limited to, the following activities:
- Updating and refining established Network policies and procedures;
- Updating and refining established policies and procedures for collaborative projects, protocols, and Network-defined projects;
- Updating and refining established policies and procedures for reviewing changes in projects not showing translational significance at the request of the laboratories/centers, and making recommendations to the NCI for replacing the project with more promising ones with revised scope and adjusted budget (increase in the budget will not be permitted);
- Updating and refining established standards or “decision criteria” for validating biomarkers/reagents for further clinical studies, such as testing early detection strategies, or as risk factors;
- Updating and refining established policies and procedures for accepting, reviewing, and recommending proposals from investigators outside the Network for supplemental funding and expanding the Network participation;
- Establishing a Data and Safety Monitoring Committee for clinical trials as appropriate to ensure protection of human subjects;
- Reviewing patient accrual, follow-up, study protocol compliance, results of audits, and regulatory requirements at the participating Centers and formally report the results of its reviews to the NCI;
- Promoting and fostering the inclusion of women and ethnic minorities in clinical studies and assure the completeness of informed consent;
- Tracking the Network research progress and assuring that the results of laboratory research and clinical studies are published in peer-reviewed journals in a timely manner and in accordance with the publication policies of the Network;
- Planning one Workshop every 18 months during the Network project period to inform the scientific community and relevant advocacy groups of the progress made toward development and clinical application of biomarkers developed through the Network. The NCI Project Coordinator, members of the Network Consulting Team, and other NCI staff will provide the Steering Committee with advice on participants for the workshops. The DMCC will manage the logistics for these meetings.
- At any time during the course of a Network project (e.g., collaborative research supported by the Core Fund), the Steering Committee may ask a BDL or CVC to serve as a BRL on an as needed basis with appropriate compensation from the Core Fund. The Steering Committee may also examine the validation data for biomarkers/reagents developed by the Network, and decide when a biomarker is sufficiently validated, or recommend when to stop non-productive experiments relating to biomarkers validation.
- Discussing and authorizing the development of reagents or assay refinement through BRLs, CVCs, or the private sector.
- Approving collaborative studies/study protocols. Data will be submitted centrally to the DMCC. The Steering Committee will define the rules regarding access to data and publications consistent with NCI policies.
- Determining the lead investigators of Network-wide validation studies in consultation with the NCI.
- Discussing and authorizing collaborative projects to be pursued with support of the set-aside funds from individual U01/U24 awards.
- Reviewing (with assistance of external reviewers, as needed) and discussing collaborative projects to be pursued with support of the EDRN Core Fund and individual set-aside funds.
- Advising NCI on activating funds for the recommended collaborative projects.
- Implementing the policy that the resource sharing and intellectual property requirements set forth for EDRN awardees are also adhered to by collaborating non-EDRN investigators and their institutions, including those involved in Core Fund supported activities (e.g., investigators/institutions participating in validation studies).
Dispute Resolution Process
Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between award recipients and the NIH may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened. It will have three members: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual awardee. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the awardee's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulations 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulations 45 CFR Part 16.
When multiple years are involved, awardees will be required to submit the annual Non-Competing Progress Report (PHS 2590 or RPPR) and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Approved Resource Sharing and Intellectual Property plans will become a condition of the grant award and Progress Reports must contain information on activities for the sharing of research resources and intellectual property.
A final progress report, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act), includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later. All awardees of applicable NIH grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at www.fsrs.gov on all subawards over $25,000. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
Application Submission Contacts
eRA Commons Help Desk (Questions regarding eRA Commons registration, submitting and tracking an application, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, post submission issues)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
Finding Help Online: https://grants.nih.gov/support/index.html
GrantsInfo (Questions regarding application instructions and process, finding NIH grant resources)
Sudhir Srivastava, Ph.D., M.P.H.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Peer Review Contact(s)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Financial/Grants Management Contact(s)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Authority and Regulations
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.