Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines
Entire Comment Period: 04/23/2009-05/26/2009

Browse Comments Beginning With:
Record ID:
Entry Date:
On April 23, 2009, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) published draft stem cell guidelines for public comment in the Federal Register. The purpose of these guidelines are to implement President Barack Obama’s Executive Order 13505 “Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells,” which was issued on March 9, 2009.

NIH received 49,015 comments by May 26, 2009, the closing date of the comment period, and have compiled these comments on this website. Any comments received via email or mail after the May 26 deadline are not included on this website. In reviewing the comments, NIH determined that 60 comments were inappropriate (i.e., contained SPAM responses or offensive language), and these comments have been excluded from this website. In addition, to protect the identities and personal information of individuals who submitted comments, NIH has removed personally identifiable information from the comments on this website even though individuals consented that the information provided could be made available for public review and posting.



|First 100 Records   Back 1000 Records   Back 100 Records   Records 4760 - 4859 of 49015 Forward 100 Records   Forward 1000 Records   Last 100 Records|

ID Entry Date Affiliation Organization
Name
Organization
Address
Comments Attachment
4760 05/01/2009 at 05:15:32 PM Self     As a U.S. taxpayer, I have great interest in how the funds paid to our government are used. I respectfully submit my comments concerning the guidelines for human stem cell research. After reading these guidelines from the draft from the Department of Health, I was, once again, bothered by the disregard that our government has for human life. I say this because of the following quote in the guidelines: "using human embryonic cells that were derived from embryos created by in vitro fertilization for reproductive purposes and were no longer needed for that purpose". In my personal belief, we are sacrificing a life for the purposes of another when this takes place. "no longer needed" sounds like we are ending a life with the same attitude that we would throw away something old and worn. It is my understanding that an embryo is a fertilized egg that is already a life. All it needs is a safe place to grow into a person. It is my great concern that if we start doing things like this with embryos, what will stop us from, on down the line, saying that we don't need other types or kinds of people anymore. The door is swinging wide open for this kind of activity when we treat those that have no voice like they are "no longer needed".

 
4761 05/01/2009 at 05:15:45 PM Self     The proposed regulations create a financial incentive for the creation of more human embryos to be destroyed to obtain their embryonic stem cells.

Expanding funding to new human embryonic stem cell lines will divert federal funds away from promising research treating people now with adult stem cells and will divert funds away from other sources of embryonic-like stem cells that have been generated without the use of any human embryos.

Instead of preventing any future expansion of funding for ESCR on unethical experiments involving human clones and human-animal hybrids, these regulations open the door for such funding whenever NIH wants in the future.

I oppose killing human embryos. The proposed regulations will force taxpayers like me to fund research I believe is unethical because it requires the destruction of human embryos.

 
4762 05/01/2009 at 05:16:01 PM Self     To Whom it Concerns:

I am writing to urge you to support all non-embryonic forms of stem cell research. These are the only forms that have shown promise, and they are the only ethical and morally acceptable forms of stem cell research. The United States government should in no way endorse embryonic stem cell research, nor any other research that betrays human life or our human dignity. In particular, it is an ethical crime to use taxpayer money to fund or support endeavors which its constituents reject as a fundamental violation of their conscience; in effect, this is forcing persons to fund that which their philosophical or faith beliefs compel them to reject.

We must not willfully create and destroy human life in an effort to aid it. Use the money of the American people to promote ethical and successful stem cell research, namely that which does not involve the production or destruction of human lives, however small they may be.

Thank you for your time.

Respectfully,

 
4763 05/01/2009 at 05:16:06 PM Self     I am pleased to see that the draft guidelines include the ability of embryonic stem cells from embryos created for in vitro fertilization but not used to be utilized in stem cell research.

We are waiting desperately for an additional treatment and a cure, if possible, for Parkinson's disease especially and other such diseases for which embryonic stem cell research holds promise.

Thank you!

 
4764 05/01/2009 at 05:16:31 PM Self     I want it to be noted that I oppose the use of federal tax dollars, or as far as that goes, any dollars at all, to be used to destroy life by using living human being embryos for any purpose other than to adopt the embryo to be implanted into a woman human being, as in adoption. Life begins at conception, which was proven in a court of law the day after President Obama was elected into office by a woman college student in Colorado. The research to this point has been unfruitful. However, the use of adult stem cell research has shown results. To destroy a human being at any stage of life is murder. The following definitions are taken from the Webster's NewWorld Dictionary the second concise edition.

MURDER - the unlawful and malicious or premeditated killing of one human being by another.

BEING - one that lives or exists, or is assumed to do so (a human being)

EXISTS - to have reality or actual being

Therefore to premeditate and take the action of killing a living human being embryo is murder. To kill human beings at any stage is WRONG.

Sincerely,

 
4765 05/01/2009 at 05:16:39 PM Self     I strongly disagree with the idea or consideration to Fund embryonic Human Stem cell research as ordered On March 9, 2009, President Barack H. Obama issued Executive Order 13505: Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells. The Executive Order states that the Secretary of Health and Human Services, through the Director of NIH, may support and conduct responsible, scientifically worthy human stem cell research, including human embryonic stem cell research, to the extent permitted by law. This is a travesty that the American taxpayer should have to fund such cause.

 
4766 05/01/2009 at 05:16:48 PM Self     Please do not allow embryonic stem cell research. There has never been any documented success in this research,the cells only create tumors. However, adult stem cell research has had great success. I am one of those who has benefited from that research as I have Multiple Myeloma. I would urge you to put your efforts into something that has proven to be helpful to people and not into killing human embryos.

 
4767 05/01/2009 at 05:17:27 PM Self     I strongly oppose the killing of human embryos. The proposed regulations will force taxpayers like myself to fund research I believe is unethical because it requires the destruction of human embryos. Specifically, this expansion of funding to new human embryonic stem cell lines will divert federal funds away from promising research treating people now with adult stem cells. Also, this expansion of federal funding will divert funds away from other sources of embryonic-like stem cells that have been generated without the use of any human embryos. I strongly believe that these concerns need to be addressed in the official NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines.

 
4768 05/01/2009 at 05:17:52 PM Self     Embryonic stem cell research holds great promise for millions of Americans suffering from many diseases and disorders. I am not a scientist, but I am a member of the Parkinson’s community and have been following progress in this field with great interest. Significant strides have been made over the past decade, and the final guidelines issued by NIH must build on this progress so that cures and new therapies can get to patients as quickly as possible. The final guidelines should not create new bureaucratic hurdles that will slow the pace of progress.

I am pleased that these draft guidelines -- in Section II B -- would appear to permit federal funding of stem cell lines previously not eligible for federal funding and for new lines created in the future from surplus embryos at fertility clinics. However, as drafted, Section II B does not ensure that any current stem cell line will meet the criteria outlined and thus be eligible for federal funding. It will be important for the final guidelines to allow federal funds for research using all stem cell lines created by following ethical practices at the time they were derived. This will ensure that the final guidelines build on progress that has already been made.

I also believe that the final guidelines should permit federal funding for stem cell lines derived from sources other than excess IVF embryos, such as somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Sections II B and IV of the draft guidelines do not permit such federal funding and I recommend that the final guidelines provide federal funding using stem cell lines derived in other ways. If not, it is essential that the NIH continue to monitor developments in this exciting research area and to update these guidelines as the research progresses.

 
4769 05/01/2009 at 05:18:30 PM Self     Embrionic stem cell research has not had sucessful results as has adult stem cell use. Furthermore it involves killing and introduces a big business of collecting the embrios. I am against it on these three counts.

 
4770 05/01/2009 at 05:19:18 PM Self     Please continue to use the successful adult stem cells for research and assistance to those with crippling diseases. Thank you.

 
4771 05/01/2009 at 05:19:41 PM Self     Using human ADULT stem cells has already been proven to work. Rather than pursuing human EMBRYONIC stem cell research, time would be better spent seeking more ADULT stem cell donors. Inform the public as to how to become a stem cell donor. Moral and religious issues aside, it makes sense to go with what is already proven to work. We believe the ban on funding of human EMBRYONIC stem cell research should REMAIN IN PLACE.

 
4772 05/01/2009 at 05:20:08 PM Self     Please consider using adult stem cells that have shown promise of physical benefit and do not use new baby cell that have no promise of benefit. The only thing we can accomplish is more abortions.

 
4773 05/01/2009 at 05:20:37 PM Self     I request that you direct funding for stem cell research toward adult stem cells where the results have been overwhelmingly positive and beneficial. To use taxpayer funds to pay for unseccessful embryonic is unethical - both financially and morally. As good scientists, surely you would want to focus on proven research. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. As a health professional, I have worked in bone marrow transplantation and know some of the benefits of adult stem cells. Please channel funding to this proven technology.

 
4774 05/01/2009 at 05:20:46 PM Self     I oppose killing human embryos. The proposed regulations will force taxpayers like me to fund research I believe is unethical because it requires the destruction of human embryos.

 
4775 05/01/2009 at 05:20:46 PM Self     Please do not go into the stem cell studies. There is enough of this going on now

 
4776 05/01/2009 at 05:21:23 PM Self     If I may, I prefer to reference the whole article. There is absolutely NO REASON to use human stem cells from embryos. For over three years now it has been known that adult human stem cells can and have been used in cases where there have been cures. This form of scientific research has been worked on and is being improved on a regular basis. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY CURE OR IMPROVEMENT OF ANY KIND USING EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS! There have also been stem cells used from umbilical cords after the birth of children. I have been a nurse for over 30 years having worked in various fields and though now retired I still have an interest in science. I learned about the advances using adult stem cells,and umbilical cord cells, and the non-advancement using embryonic stem cells through several different programs, two of which were news programs! Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this very important subject. I hope that this can be more fully investigated and that this controversy can be put to rest for good.

 
4777 05/01/2009 at 05:21:38 PM Self     I strongly oppose this legislation and any legislation that further supports embronic stem cell research. This is morally reprehensible and I resent tax dollars be used in this way.

 
4778 05/01/2009 at 05:21:49 PM Self     Please oppose this regulation ..thanks for your time

 
4779 05/01/2009 at 05:22:25 PM Self     Last week, April 23, NIH officially posted draft guidelines to open federal funding for research on human embryonic stem cells. These guidelines will send our tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these human embryos, these draft guidelines would require their death.

We are opposed to the destruction of human life at any stage of development. Our consciences and faith dictate that we should be protecting the most vulnerable and innocent in society, not murdering them. We do not want our tax dollars spent on this unnecessary and barbaric activity.

No scientific promise has been shown in this sort of destruction. In fact, alternatives to embryonic stem cell research, alternatives that do not require the destruction of life, have shown great promise.

There is no logical reason to pursue this path, and use of our tax dollars for this purpose is a violation of our rights as Americans.

 
4780 05/01/2009 at 05:22:25 PM Self     I oppose the use of fereral funds for research on human embryonic stem cells. There is success on the use of adult stem cells and none with embryonic. It is wrong to kill innocent babies for this purpose.

 
4781 05/01/2009 at 05:22:26 PM Self     I am opposed to using taxpayer money to destroy human embryos for research which has shown so little promise. Money could be much better spent on adult stem cell research with no ethical conflict.

 
4782 05/01/2009 at 05:22:36 PM Self     This is entirely against everything we believe about life. When such good research is coming out of other stem cell research why is this the way you are choosing to follow? We do NOT want our tax money ( coming from both our small business and our selves) spent in such a manner. We believe in the sanctity of life and this throws that aside into the gutter. Even family members who have Parkinson's do not agree with this. This is too high a cost to pay for a few more years of life, in my mother-in-law's eyes. Please reconsider - private funding is one thing but public funding is another. You have already trampled on our views in most other areas but this is too much!

 
4783 05/01/2009 at 05:22:49 PM Self     I am strongly opposed to the use of embryonic human stem cells for stem cell research, and the use of MY TAX DOLLARS to fund this research is a gross injustice. This practice will promote a whole new industry of embryo creation and destruction, including the creation of human embryos by cloning for research in which they are destroyed. This will force American taxpayers, including those who see the deliberate taking of human life in the embryonic stage as profoundly unjust, to be complicit in this practice. There are other options currently under development that would not require the taking of a life in its embryonic stage. Let us pursue these other options lest we be remembered in history as the nation that killed its own people.

 
4784 05/01/2009 at 05:23:47 PM Self     On March 9, 2009 President Barack Obama issued an executive order that overturned President Bush's policy and opened the floodgates for funding more embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) that creates an incentive to create and destroy human embryos. Last week, April 23, NIH officially posted draft guidelines to open federal funding for research on human embryonic stem cells. I oppose these regulations and I oppose the use of federal funds for research on human embryonic stem cells.

 
4785 05/01/2009 at 05:23:50 PM Self     We are strongly opposed to the use of embryonic stem cells for any research purpose for the prevention of disease or otherwise. We do approve of the use of skin cells.

 
4786 05/01/2009 at 05:24:01 PM Self     As adopting parents, we know that embryos "left over" from in vitro fertilization are in fact little babies just waiting to be born. Embryo adoption is an amazing way to give life to the frozen embryos! We implore you to oppose these draft regulations that would allow for these embryos to be sold to science! Thank you from all the waiting to be brought to life embryos!!!!!!!!!

 
4787 05/01/2009 at 05:24:13 PM Self     We OPPOSE being forced to have our taxpayer funds used in order to support embryonic stem cell research or the use of embryone stem cells in any way.

It has been amply shown that adult stem cells are much more effective in treating medical problems than embryonic stem cells, and there is no moral or ethical problem associated with the use of adult stem cells, as opposed to using embryonic stem cells, which involve destroying human beings.

 
4788 05/01/2009 at 05:24:20 PM Self     The exectutive order by President Obama, overturning G.W. Bush's resriction on stem cell research will open the flood gates of the killing of the unborn. This coupled with the murder of 1,000,000 children per year is placing this country in the ranks of the most despicable murderous governments in history.

It is no coincidence that the emergence of uthanasia and sexual perversion also comes from this moral cesspool we have created.

Any country endorsing this moral bankruptcy cannot survive.

 
4789 05/01/2009 at 05:24:46 PM Self     please do not alow federal funds for research on human embryonic stem cells

 
4790 05/01/2009 at 05:24:50 PM Self     NIH funding of the derivation of stem cells from human embryos is prohibited by the annual appropriations ban on funding of human embryo research (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2009, Pub. L. 110-161, 3/11/09), otherwise known as the Dickey-Wicker Amendment. There were good reasons for doing this and to once again allow it would be an assault to our conscience, as a people who would prefer to honor and protect life rather than destroy it. My understanding of the research that has been going on is that there has been much success with adult stem cells and very little with embryonic cells. Also I understand that in the private sector, this type of research is already going on. As it is our tax money that would fund this type of research and my conscience screams against it, I would object to using taxpayer funds to kill viable embryo for the sake of research. In this time of economic distress, why would the government want to add this to the list of items they need to pay for? Please consider these things in spite of Pres Obama's directive.

 
4791 05/01/2009 at 05:24:53 PM Self     I am not a scientist, but I have been following the progress in issues regarding stem cell research because I watched my Uncle deteriorate every year for years and eventually pass away due to parkinsons. I also had a dear friend from Missouri who passed away at the young age of 55 due to parkinsons.

Embryonic stem cell research holds great promise for millions of Americans suffering from many diseases and disorders. Significant strides have been made over the past decade, and the final guidelines issued by NIH must build on this progress so that cures and new therapies can get to patients as quickly as possible. The final guidelines should not create new bureaucratic hurdles that will slow the pace of progress.

I am pleased that these draft guidelines -- in Section II B -- would appear to permit federal funding of stem cell lines previously not eligible for federal funding and for new lines created in the future from surplus embryos at fertility clinics. However, as drafted, Section II B does not ensure that any current stem cell line will meet the criteria outlined and thus be eligible for federal funding. It will be important for the final guidelines to allow federal funds for research using all stem cell lines created by following ethical practices at the time they were derived. This will ensure that the final guidelines build on progress that has already been made.

I also believe that the final guidelines should permit federal funding for stem cell lines derived from sources other than excess IVF embryos, such as somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Sections II B and IV of the draft guidelines do not permit such federal funding and I recommend that the final guidelines provide federal funding using stem cell lines derived in other ways. If not, it is essential that the NIH continue to monitor developments in this exciting research are and to update these guidelines as the research progresses.

 
4792 05/01/2009 at 05:25:02 PM Self     Why use embryonic stem cells when these are not the best means for helping those with spinal cord injuries, Parkinson's, and other such difficulties? Please rethink this.

 
4793 05/01/2009 at 05:25:16 PM       I strongly object to the proposed``National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Human Stem Cell Research'' in regard to using human embryonic stem cells that were derived from embryos created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) for reproductive purposes and were no longer needed for that purpose. I object to any and all research on embryonic stem cells. First, I object on moral/ethical grounds since I consider that human personhood begins at conception. Secondly, and of less importance, to my knowledge there has not been found success in the use of human embryonic stem cells in the treatment and cure of disease. On the other hand, while I have no objection to research using adult stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells since these have been found respectively to be successful and showing promise, I DO NOT want the research to be funded by the Federal Government. The private sector can adequately and should be the one to handle this matter.

 
4794 05/01/2009 at 05:25:41 PM Self     I am opposed to the destruction of embryonic life for the purposes of stem cell research. I am certainly opposed to my tax money being used in this way.

 
4795 05/01/2009 at 05:26:55 PM Self     I strongly object to using federal money for embryonic stem cell projects Period! It's time the government gets out of medaling with anything, and start getting serious about the main duty of the government, and that is protecting the people from enemies foreign, and domestic. That means preserving the constitution, and securing our borders. No more waste, which the majority of the people do object to.

 
4796 05/01/2009 at 05:27:36 PM Self     This, foremost, against God's Law. We're taking life and messing with it. No good has come of it yet while lots of gains are being made with stem cell research from parts of the body. Makes no sense to me. Thanks

 
4797 05/01/2009 at 05:27:51 PM Self     Please be advised that I oppose any federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. To me thus far this research is based on a "maybe", but destroying "life" in this venture. I would only approve federal funded research using adult stem cells

 
4798 05/01/2009 at 05:28:07 PM Self     I am opposed to the Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines. Innocent human life should not be destroyed for utilitarian reasons. So called "leftover" embryos are known by all to be human individuals. they should not have been "produced" in the first place, but now that they are, they ought not be the subject of experiments ending in their destruction. They should be protected until such time as they can be implanted in a willing woman's womb and brought to birth. It is not only the strong who have an inherent right to life.

 
4799 05/01/2009 at 05:28:38 PM Self     The use of tax payer dollars to experiment on embryo stem cells is a blatant misuse of power. There is NO scientific evidence this form of stem cell has produced anything but dangerous cells, and it not only takes one life to experiment, it has harmed other lives who were being used as guina pigs. Stems cells from cord cells or one's own body have proven to be successful, and that is where federal dollars should be directed.

 
4800 05/01/2009 at 05:29:41 PM Self     I would like to comment on funding and allowing research on embryonic stem cells. I do not want my tax dollars spent on killing embryonic stem cells or using them for research.

 
4801 05/01/2009 at 05:29:41 PM Self     I strongly disagree with being forced to pay (through taxes) for research that requires the destruction of human embryos (and hence destruction of human life). Research on adult stem cells has yielded much more in the way of potential medical therapies than has research on embryonic stem cells, and research on adult stem cells does not involve the ethical problem of requiring the destruction of a human life. Scientific research should not be divorced from morality or ethics.

 
4802 05/01/2009 at 05:29:53 PM Self     We wish to express our deep concern about the used of embryonic stem cells for research. It is apparent that there are greater options available. Cordblood stemcells and adult stemcells have shown much greater prospects than embryonic. It is a shame on this nation when we think that taking innocent life in the name of science is appropriate. Life is life and we should seek to preserve the unborns right to life over anyones right to happiness. Thank you very much for your time and your willingness to hear the people.

 
4803 05/01/2009 at 05:30:55 PM Self     It is wrong to kill babies only to further research which might or might not improve the lives of other human beings.

We might just as well kill the infirm and disabled for the same reason. Why don't we do that?

 
4804 05/01/2009 at 05:31:12 PM Self     I personally do not want my tax dollars to fund this research. It is my understanding that adult stem cells have done quite well in research and actually helping to fight different diseases. Killing an embryonic stem cell is murder to me. There are so many couples wanting children to give loving homes to. I believe this is just morally wrong!!

 
4805 05/01/2009 at 05:31:15 PM Self     We do not wish our tax dollars to go toward funding embryonic stem cell testing.

 
4806 05/01/2009 at 05:31:16 PM Self     I do not support using my tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. The adoption of these human embryos--rather than drafting guidelines that require their death--is the ethical and moral action to take.

 
4807 05/01/2009 at 05:31:17 PM Self     I am writing to oppose amending the current regulations in any manner which would authorize any use of taxpayer dollars to fund embryonic stem cell research. I urge the agency to retain the current regulations without amendment. The government should not be involved in creating a perverse economic incentive to destroy embryos. This embryonic stem cell research has yet to yield any of the promised benefits which are used to justify it, whereas adult stem cell research, which does not carry the ethical baggage of destroying human beings, has already yielded medical breakthroughs. This agency should not redirect federal money into a morally and ethically questionable area of research with questionable utility when there is a viable alternative which is both morally and ethically solid and which provides great potential for medical breakthroughs.

Both of my grandmothers and one of my grandfathers all suffered from Alzheimer’s Disease before their deaths and I strongly support research that would cure this horrible disease. There are many other diseases out there that also are in desperate needs of effective treatments and cures. However, I cannot support a form of research which destroys human embryos with taxpayer dollars when there is a more effective and non-controversal alternative.

If embryonic stem cell research had the great potential that its supporters claim, then it wouldn't need a government subsidy to prod researchers into exploring it. The private sector, especially drug companies, would love to discover miracle cures which could fill their bank accounts. The fact that the private sector money has moved away from embryonic stem cell research to adult stem cell research shows where drug companies, who fund research into new treatments for various disorders constantly, believe that there would be the best return on their investment. The government should follow their lead and spend its money accordingly.

For all of these reasons, I oppose the current proposed amendments to the extent that they authorize federal funding of embryonic stem cell research and urge the agency to retain the current regulations without amendment.

 
4808 05/01/2009 at 05:32:17 PM Self     Please, DO NOT fund embryonic stem cell research! It has been proven that adult stem cells are more condusive than embryonic cells.

 
4809 05/01/2009 at 05:32:35 PM Self     I think what you are doing is wrong.

This is not the change we asked for.

 
4810 05/01/2009 at 05:32:41 PM Self     If you believe, as I do, that life starts at conception then the killing of embryos for research is murder. Since no cures have come from such killing it is criminal to continue this practice. Stem cells taken from umbilical cords could be used. Life is a gift and we have no right to deny that gift from ANY person--even one that is only a few cells big. It is truly a time to pray that such research ends. Prayer is what I will continue to do!

 
4811 05/01/2009 at 05:32:42 PM Self     I am against experimenting on embryos stem cells. These guidelines send my tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these human embryos, these draft guidelines would require their death. I do not want to pay for killing an unborn child.

 
4812 05/01/2009 at 05:33:06 PM Self     I am opposed to federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. There are many adult stem cell lines, as well as fetal stem cells from cord blood, that can be researched for use in medical diseases. To destroy a potential human life for research is immoral and not necessary.

Regardless of the safegaurds that the government puts in place, it will only be a matter of time before cloning occurs in humans. This will be an ethical and moral disaster for the human race.

 
4813 05/01/2009 at 05:33:17 PM Self     I think that Mr.Obma is wrong and many other demacrats when it comes to abortion and stem cell research. God does not condone such acts of sin. Mr. Obama said the other night in his 100 day speach that obortion was a moral issue and needs to be decided by the mother. Well murder rape inner marrage with family members are immoral issues as well and their against the law. So i think Mr. Obama and his fellow demacrats are making up there own laws as they go. This is against the law and our constitution. Its time we act and put people in jail for breaking the law. To heal this world we need to go to the Bible and take heed to second CHRONICLES chapter 7 verse 14.Then if My people who are called by My name will humble themselves and pray and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways, I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sins and heal their land. God bless you and all that you do to further the kingdom of JESUS the CHRIST. your fellow brother in CHRIST JESUS.

 
4814 05/01/2009 at 05:34:00 PM Self     Embryonic stem cells: 1) Come from the destruction of living human beings (embryos) 2) Have shown no success in treating disease. Adult stem cells have been very successful. 3) Item 1 above should stop this research immediately based on respect for human life 4) Item 2 should stop this research based on common sense

 
4815 05/01/2009 at 05:34:19 PM Self     Since Obama has absolutely no morals at all about the murder of the unborn, I doubt that he can be swayed from further murder of the unborn for research. He has no conscience, no morals, he is nothing but a bloody handed murderer of the unborn.

 
4816 05/01/2009 at 05:34:20 PM Self     Very simple and straight forward:

25 years of EMBRIONIC stem cell research has produced NOTHING.

Adult stem cells have produced dozens of uses and cures. They are much more stable and predictable.

Why throw more money at something that has done nothing instead of putting that money where we are getting a good return for our investment.

If this is about finding cures and helping people, then forget about embrionic stem cells and go for the stable adult version.

BUT, if this is about POLITICAL POSTURING, then of course you will do what is politically correct and destroy America's conscience by promoting the idea that they aren't human till the court says they are human. So, pour the people's money down the drain and forget about finding real cures.

 
4817 05/01/2009 at 05:34:41 PM Self     I am writing to oppose funding of embryonic stem cell research. It is both immoral and impractical -- it is wrong to use human beings for research and it is foolish to spend money in an unproductive area when adult stem cell research has already helped people and shown more promise.

 
4818 05/01/2009 at 05:36:11 PM Self     President Bush's policy was to allow funding for research that involved embryonic stem cells taken from human embryos so long as the cells were obtained on or prior to August 9, 2001. Since then, the government has funded research on over 22 stem cell lines. President Bush's policy erected a wall and did not encourage the further killing of human embryos for their cells. However, on March 9, 2009 President Barack Obama issued an executive order that overturned President Bush's policy and opened the floodgates for funding more embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) that creates an incentive to create and destroy human embryos. President Obama designated the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to draft guidelines for distributing funds for this research. Last week, April 23, NIH officially posted draft guidelines to open federal funding for research on human embryonic stem cells. These guidelines send my tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these human embryos, these draft guidelines would require their death.

Embryonic stem cells have only proven to be dangerous, causing unchecked tumor growth. Adult stem cells have proven successful in treatments of several diseases and do NOT require the death of a human being (embryo). I oppose the use of federal funds to support research on human embryonic stem cells.

 
4819 05/01/2009 at 05:36:19 PM Self     Please do not expand stem cell research to include embryonic stem cells. Adult cells is where we have been successful in past. We do not need to create or kill human embryos in the name of science. Thank you.

 
4820 05/01/2009 at 05:36:25 PM Self     Federal Funds ( tax payer monies) should not be used for embyonic stem cell research. It is against moral ethics to kill unborn babies to do research. All the amazing positive information has been obtained from adult stem cells without the need to kill anyone.

 
4821 05/01/2009 at 05:36:31 PM Self     Dear Sir/Madam, I am opposed to the use of embryonic stem cells for research. Currently, adult stem cell research is yielding positive results. Furthermore, the use of human embyros is unethical. If these embyros were implanted in a human, a human would develop. As stated in the guidelines, adult stem cell funding would continue, without the destruction of potential human life. Thank you for your reconsideration of this issue. Sincerely,

 
4822 05/01/2009 at 05:36:41 PM Self     Please do not allow the destruction of human embryos for stem cell research. These could be adopted by parents who are infertile. Adult stem cell research has been very promising. Let's just focus our money where there is hope without destroying human lives.

 
4823 05/01/2009 at 05:37:23 PM Self     I oppose the use of federal funds for research on human embryonic stem cells. You need to know than many Americans disagree with the recent executive order than President Barack Obama issued which paves the way for further embryonic stem cell research!

 
4824 05/01/2009 at 05:37:54 PM Self     Primary: to my knowledge nobody is qualified to determine when life is initiated. As such, to harvest embryonic cells and thereby to end a concieved life is barbaric, and is morally equivalent to cannibalism. Secondarily: to my knowledge and notwithstanding the value of stemcells, embryonic cells provide no advantage over other morally harvested cells.

Stop this Now!

 
4825 05/01/2009 at 05:38:42 PM Self     I believe this is wrong and should not be allowed. I know that althought Stem Cell research could have the potential to do a lot it still isn't right. If one was to steal from one to give to the needy does that make it just? The answer is no!

 
4826 05/01/2009 at 05:38:46 PM Self     Last month, when President Obama overturned the federal funding ban on embryonic stem cell (ESC) research, he left the parameters of that decision up to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The NIH officially posted draft guidelines on ESC, which open the floodgates for the destruction of embryos at taxpayers' expense. Under the rules, my dollars would pay for research on stem cells derived from embryos who are supposedly "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these tiny humans, the NIH guidelines will sentence them to death. I choose to use these comment pages to state that I do not want my tax dollars to pay for the killing of the tiny humans that remain from in vitro fertilization. I am tired of having my pro-life values ignored. therefore, I oppose the use of my tax dollars and everyone elses' tax dollars to experiment with embryonic human beings.

 
4827 05/01/2009 at 05:39:54 PM Self     Please consider changing your guidelines to represent a commitment to sustaining life and not destroying it.

There is no justifiable reason to kill embryos in order to promote the type of research you're doing.

Thank you for your consideration,

 
4828 05/01/2009 at 05:40:54 PM       Go with proven results of adult stem cells.

 
4829 05/01/2009 at 05:41:01 PM Self     I AM APPALLED AT PRESIDENT OBAMA FOR EVEN CONSIDERING THIS LEGISLATION THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO DO STEM CELL RESEARCH LEAVE THE EMBROY STEM CELLS ALONE PAY FOR THE PREGNANT WOMEN TO DONATE THE BLOOD FROM THE UMBILICAL CHORD...THAT IS A BETTER WAY THAN USING IT FOR ABORTION OR EXPERIMENTS SUCH AS THIS THIS IS A TRAVESTY AND AN INSULT TO HUMANITY NEXT, PRESIDENT OBAMA, YOU WILL BE IN AGREEMENT OF HUMAN CLONING WAKE UP AND DON'T CLAIM TO BELIEVE IN GOD AS THE LATE PAYNE STEWART WOULD SAY IN ANY ACTION THAT HE TOOK, "WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?" WELL, MR PRESIDENT, CAN YOU ANSWER THAT WITH FULL BELIEF THAT JESUS WOULD AGREE TO THIS? I DOUBT IT.....

 
4830 05/01/2009 at 05:41:04 PM Self     I am strongly opposed to President Obama's executive order that overturned President Bush's policy and opened the floodgates for funding more embryonic stem cell research. I am opposed to the NIH guidelines that propose using our tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these human embryos, these draft guidelines would require their death. Destroying human embryos is inhumane.

 
4831 05/01/2009 at 05:41:08 PM Self     Please do not approve Embryonic stem cell research.

Please continue support of nonembryonic stem cell research which already has a proven record of success.

 
4832 05/01/2009 at 05:41:14 PM Self     I oppose ESCR and do not support any measures to use embryonic stem cells for research. Adult stem cells have a success rate in treating diseases and illnesses 73:0 , in favor of ASC. This is bad research and should be left to the private sector.

 
4833 05/01/2009 at 05:41:19 PM Self     As one small taxpayer in the giant wheel of fortune in this misguided Country, I would like to submit my humble request that this madness of stem cell research be stopped. It is a sad state of affairs when an American citizen has no choice in the direction their tax dollars are spent. Use all the fancy terminology you choose, the bottom line is killing more unborn babies to further your scientific research. I shudder to think of what you have in store for us next!

 
4834 05/01/2009 at 05:41:29 PM Self     What if you are wrong? What IF life begins at conception? What IF each life is imbued with a God-given soul at conception? What IF you are promoting mass murder through abortion and embryonic stem cell research?

You can't be 100% certain of your position. It's convenient, sure. But what IF.....

Wouldn't society be better off erring on the side of caution? Aren't the risks of being wrong too great?

 
4835 05/01/2009 at 05:41:46 PM Self     There is no doubt in my mind that you can and will find "justification" for embryonic stem cell research. But just because you can, does not make it any less reprehensible. It would take some doing to take a position which essentially would state that adult stem cell research provides a more-than-adequate platform to reach the scientific goals that some think are only achievable through embryonic stem cell research.

 
4836 05/01/2009 at 05:41:54 PM Self     I oppose the use of federal funds for research on human embryonic stem cells.

 
4837 05/01/2009 at 05:41:59 PM Self     Concerning the statement: "Studies of human embryonic stem cells may yield information about the complex events that occur during human development"; Do we really need to kill embryonic human beings to know these things and is this really ethical? All humna life should be protected from conception to natural death. If we went along the lines that we need to do these studies to yield information about the complex events that occur during human development, what's to stop us from killing grandma so we could see what stage her cells are in.

Concerning the statement: "Stem cells,directed to differentiate into specific cell types, offer the possibility of a renewable source of replacement cells and tissues to treat diseases and conditions, including Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal cord injury, burns, heart disease, diabetes, and arthritis"; These maladies are already being treated successfully with ADULT and Pluripotent Stem cells. We don't need to spend the money on embryonic research for these purposes. Why spend money twice to get the same results. Why not increase the funding on the ethical ADULT and Pluripotenet stem cell therapies. The only time I've heard of embryonic stem cells being used was in a caes of parkinsons where the embryonic stem cells turned cancerous because of the uncontrolled cell divisions you mentioned in the guidelines. Also tremors were increased in these patients. Ther was NO relief.

 
4838 05/01/2009 at 05:44:10 PM Self     If Embryonic Cells had showed "any" promise, Commercial Companies would already be willing to invest large sums of money for Private development and research.

This is all about Money. Free Taxpayer money which can be used to build more research facilities, buy more equipment and conduct research in stem cell development in "OTHER" areas of stem cell research. This FREE Federal taxpayer money also enhances the prestige of the University and helps to increase their student enrollment.

The Universities are also interested in the "Patent Royalties" they may gain, which benefit them, but "NOT" the taxpayers. It would seem that the taxpayers should benefit from the money that is earned from their money being directly used for this research.

 
4839 05/01/2009 at 05:44:40 PM Self     Thank you for your dedication to the general health of the American public. Scientific research is cornerstone of our nation's medical advancement.

Please remember that America has a tradition of respecting human life. All human lives are valuable in our great country. As a medical student, I strive to improve the health of all people who are need of help. Even the "least of these" is worthy of such support.

Let us not forget that even the tinist American citizens deserve the right for life, liberty, and the pursuit of hapiness. You have enjoyed this American privelages. Please do not rob them from our unborn fellow humans.

Please consider guidelines that do not lead the death of more innocent human lives, even lives that are in womb of a mother. You began at the moment of your conception. Your life was spared, not by your own doing, but because other people recognized your life.

Please do not turn a blind eye to the many little lives who are unborn. They matter. They are our future. No society should destroy its own for the purpose of scientific advancement.

Thank you for your service and your time.

 
4840 05/01/2009 at 05:45:06 PM Self     Please do not use federal fund or other funds for research on human embryonic stem cells. You would be tinkering with mankind--created by God! Please read Genesis 1-3 and join me in awe of His creation story. Mankind can patch accident injuries, but even then it's God who does the healing.

 
4841 05/01/2009 at 05:45:18 PM Self     Stem cell research etc is just like abortions-plain and simple murder. This admnistration has overruled all the banned abortions and stem cell research. We are heading toward disaster by opening these thing back up. President Bush may have not done much to make people happy, but he RESPECTED life. Now all the cabinent members etc are for abortion, and just like the court justices will be to before its over with. Thank you.

 
4842 05/01/2009 at 05:45:27 PM Self     I am opposed to the particular type of unregulated stem-cell research that our current administration is trying to pass.This will lead our country down a path without the necessary ethical considerations that protect the sanctity of life.Please stop the political process currently in motion.

 
4843 05/01/2009 at 05:46:23 PM Self     I do not favor embryonic stem cell research. I am a taxpayer and a loyal American who served in our military for over twenty years. I believe that if discoveries cannot be made from the many sources of herbs, tree roots, and organic materials maybe you ought to back up and take notice. Is there a deficiency in the researchers practices? Is there any evidence that the research to this point has made medical improvements. If so, it has not been released and documented. I believe that we are responsible to God for allowing birth unobstructed to fetuses in the womb. Count me strongly as an opposer.

 
4844 05/01/2009 at 05:46:36 PM Self     you may know, President Bush's policy was to allow funding for research that involved embryonic stem cells taken from human embryos so long as the cells were obtained on or prior to August 9, 2001. Since then, the government has funded research on over 22 stem cell lines. President Bush's policy erected a wall and did not encourage the further killing of human embryos for their cells.

However, on March 9, 2009 President Barack Obama issued an executive order that overturned President Bush's policy and opened the floodgates for funding more embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) that creates an incentive to create and destroy human embryos. President Obama designated the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to draft guidelines for distributing funds for this research. Last week, April 23, NIH officially posted draft guidelines to open federal funding for research on human embryonic stem cells. What these guidelines do is send your tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these human embryos, these draft guidelines would require their death.

 
4845 05/01/2009 at 05:47:01 PM Self     I am opposed to the use of federal funds for research on human embryonic stem cells. Please do not use our tax dollars in this way. Thank you.

 
4846 05/01/2009 at 05:47:18 PM Self     As an American, I am strongly opposed to Preident Obama's overturning of President Bush's restriction on the funding of stem cell research. It has been proven both scientifically and medically that adult stem cell is already doing wonders in the field of research and treatment of rare diseases and illnesses. Besides, it is morally wrong to create embryos (life)and destroy it for the purpose of seeking a cure. We would only be a nation amusing ourselves to death as Neil Postman warned nearly three decades ago if we think that we can live with an amoral conscience.

 
4847 05/01/2009 at 05:47:25 PM Self     There are numerous cell line available for testing right now. Adult stem cells are proving very successful in treating many diseases,and conditions at the present time. Meanwhile opening more lines means destroying embryos(would be babies) Research is supposed to build up and cure humans, not destroy them before they have a chance at life!!

 
4848 05/01/2009 at 05:47:43 PM Self     Please do not allow U.S. taxpayer money to be used to kill human embryos just to do research. Plenty of benefits have come from research of adult stem cells. This type of research should continue. Using embryonic stem cells kills the embryo. If this same embryo were in a woman's uterus and anyone destroyed it, that person could be tried for murder. How is a scientist doing research any different if the outcome is the same - a dead embryo, rather than a living human being. Thank you for considering my request.

 
4849 05/01/2009 at 05:49:29 PM Self     Please do not use federal funding for research on human embryonic stem cells. Life begins at conception. In using embryonic stem cells you are killing the unborn child. Researches have had great success with adult stem cells and none with Embryonic stem cells. Why keep killing the unborn babies using my tax dollars when adult stem cells do a better job and no one is killed for the harvest.

 
4850 05/01/2009 at 05:49:32 PM Self     Please do not allow more embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) that creates an incentive to create and destroy human embryos. I especially do not want to fund this with MY tax dollarss. It is insane how much money has been spent with the Econimic stimulis package and all the bailouts. We are going to be saddled with a debt that this country and it's people cannot sustain!

 
4851 05/01/2009 at 05:49:39 PM Self     With such little evidence, and thus far no success, that embryonic stem cells can provide remedies, be prudent. Why put government money, which is our money, and my money, behind something that is not effective and that many people object to.

If remedies are to be found, let them be found on the dollars of private organizations and individuals. Then, if such findings are made, let our government dollars follow. But for the time being, be prudent, and do not waste our money. Sure it is not a waste in the absolute sense, for science is being promoted; however, the opportunity costs are too much. This money could go to more effective uses.

As a taxpayer and as a citizen, I ask that you not go forward with ESC research unless and until further evidence of its effectiveness is found. If our money is to go toward research, let it go toward stem cell research only.

Sincerely,

 
4852 05/01/2009 at 05:50:00 PM Self     Please oppose the use of federal funds to support embryonic stem cell research.

 
4853 05/01/2009 at 05:50:04 PM Self     If you wouldn't do it to your own chlid, why would you do it to an unborn child? Life begins at conception. What you are doing to unborn children is inhumane. I do NOT want my tax dollars paying for experiments on stem cell taken from human embryos.

 
4854 05/01/2009 at 05:50:31 PM Self     It breaks my heart to see human life treated with such indignity. And to use my tax money to pay for it. I beg of you to please quit this embryonic stem cell research now. It is not plausible to take one life to preserve another. I know that many believe that life is not sustained until birth. Unfortunately, this is a belief of convenience so that others may do as they wish. Maybe I can't stop that, but I appeal to everyone to not use my money to pursue this sick endeavor. Besides all of that, adult stem cells are the ones that hold promise. Please, rethink this. Sincerely,

 
4855 05/01/2009 at 05:51:00 PM Self     The ONLY effective research on stem cells has come from the research on ADULT stem cells!!!!!! We have had NO success from embryonic stem cell research! Check it out! It's the truth. Adult stem cell research has produced 72 cures and treatments. Embryonic stem cell research and human cloning has produced “0” cures and treatments. This doesn't even begin to touch on the ethical questions involved here! PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE look at the research FACTS! Please, start thinking of these embryos as precious human lives that are being slaughtered! All reading this started out as an embryo - thank God your Mother chose to keep you! Life is gift - not a lab project!!

 
4856 05/01/2009 at 05:51:52 PM Self     I Oppose the use of our taxpayer dollars for experiments that rely on killing embryonic human cells. This type of research has no success and has caused brain tumors when it has been used. Adult stem cells show far more promise and validated successful results. Why would anyone support embryonic research when adult stem cell research has shone great results. If all Americans new the facts of this issue, I am sure their would be strong support for Adult Stem Cell research.

 
4857 05/01/2009 at 05:51:52 PM Self     We strongly oppose any federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Research on adult stem cells has resulted in numerous medical advances while embryonic stem cell research has not been nearly as productive and cheapens our society's perception of life- a very slippery slope. Our voting record will reflect our strongly-held concerns.

 
4858 05/01/2009 at 05:52:15 PM Self     Killing human embryos for scientific research is unjustified. There are other sources of stem cells that do not require taking a human life. Maybe there are those within the government who do not mind taking the lives of their children or grandchildren, I call them "baby killers". But someone needs to defend the rights of the unborn. To do otherwise will bring down the wrath of God upon all of us.

 
4859 05/01/2009 at 05:52:27 PM Self     Embryonic stem cell research holds great promise for millions of Americans suffering from many diseases and disorders. I am not a scientist, but I am a member of the Parkinson’s community, due to the fact that I have a daughter (age 43) and a son-in-law (age 47) that both suffer from Parkinson's disease, and have been following progress in this field with great interest. Significant strides have been made over the past decade, and the final guidelines issued by NIH must build on this progress so that cures and new therapies can get to patients as quickly as possible. The final guidelines should not create new bureaucratic hurdles that will slow the pace of progress.

I am pleased that these draft guidelines -- in Section II B -- would appear to permit federal funding of stem cell lines previously not eligible for federal funding and for new lines created in the future from surplus embryos at fertility clinics. However, as drafted, Section II B does not ensure that any current stem cell line will meet the criteria outlined and thus be eligible for federal funding. It will be important for the final guidelines to allow federal funds for research using all stem cell lines created by following ethical practices at the time they were derived. This will ensure that the final guidelines build on progress that has already been made.

I also believe that the final guidelines should permit federal funding for stem cell lines derived from sources other than excess IVF embryos, such as somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Sections II B and IV of the draft guidelines do not permit such federal funding and I recommend that the final guidelines provide federal funding using stem cell lines derived in other ways. If not, it is essential that the NIH continue to monitor developments in this exciting research area and to update these guidelines as the research progresses.

 



Go to NIH Stem Cell Information Page