COVID-19

  • Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Information for NIH Applicants and Recipients of NIH Funding
  • Applicant/Recipient COVID-19 Update History
  • CDC COVID-19
  • Get the latest research information from NIH | Español
Expand for resources

n/a Warning! This browser is not supported - Some features might not work. Try using a different browser such as Chrome, Edge, Firefox, or Safari.

  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
Grants Home
  • eRA  |  new windowwNIH Staff   |  Glossary  |  FAQs  |  Help
  • Home
  • About Grants
    • Grants Process Overview
    • Get Started

    • Learn the Basics
    • Plan Your Application
    • How to Apply

    • Prepare to Apply
    • Write Application
    • Submit
    • How to Apply Video Tutorials

      Application Referral and Review

    • Receipt and Referral
    • Peer Review
    • Pre-Award and Post-Award Processes

    • Pre-Award and Award Process
    • Post Award Monitoring and Reporting
    • Forms Library

      Information For

    • Researchers
    • Research Administrators
    • Reviewers
    • Small Businesses Link to External Site
    • Foreign Grants
    • Media and the Public
    • NIH Staff Lock Icon
  • Funding
    • Find Grant Funding (NIH Guide to Grants and Contracts)
    • Other Transactions
    • Contracts
    • Research Training and Career Development Link to External Site
    • Loan Repayment Programs Link to External Site
    • Extramural Diversity Link to External Site
    • NIH Funding Strategies




      Notice IconAvoid Grant Scams
  • Policy & Compliance
    • NIH Grants Policy Statement
    • Notices of Policy Changes
    • Compliance & Oversight
    • Policy Topics

    • Animal Welfare Link to External Site
    • Application Submission Policies
    • Clinical Trial Requirements
    • Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    • Early Stage Investigator Policies
    • Family-Friendly Initiatives
    • Financial Conflict of Interest
    • Human Subjects Research
    • Inclusion Policies
    • Intellectual Property Policy
    • Lobbying Guidance for Grantee Activities
    • Natural Disasters
    • NIH Funding Strategies
    • Peer Review Policies and Practices
    • Protecting U.S. Biomedical Intellectual Innovation
    • Public Access Link to External Site
    • Research Integrity
    • Resources to Evaluate Workplace Climate
    • Rigor and Reproducibility
    • Sharing Policies Link to External Site
    • Supporting a Safe and Respectful Workplace
  • News & Events

      Latest News

    • News Highlights
    • "Open Mike" Blog Link to External Site
    • Extramural Nexus Link to External Site
    • Subscribe and Follow

    • Listservs
    • Social Media

      Virtual Learning

    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
    • NIH Grants YouTube Channel Link to External Site

      Connect In Person

    • NIH Regional Seminars on Program
      Funding & Grants Administration
    • SBIR-STTR Engage & Connect Link to External Site
    • Loan Repayment Program (LRP)
      Contact & Engage
       Link to External Site
    • Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)
      Workshops and Conference
      Link to External Site
    • Events Calendar
  • About OER
    • About the Office of Extramural Research
    • OER Offices

    • Immediate Office of the Director (IMOD)
    • Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration (OPERA)
    • Office of Research Reporting and Analysis (ORRA)
    • Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)
    • Strategic Management and Contracts Office (SMCO)
    • Office of Electronic Research Administration (eRA)
    • Division of Communication & Outreach (DCO)
    • Small Business Education and Entrepreneurial Development (SEED)
    • Division of Biomedical Research Workforce (DBRW)
    • Division of Human Subjects Research (DHSR)
  • eRA
    Link to External Site
  • NIH Staff Lock Icon
  • Home
  • FAQs
  • Help

Policy & Compliance

  • NIH Grants Policy Statement
  • Notices of Policy Changes
  • Compliance & Oversight
  • Select Policy Topics+
    • Animal Welfare
    • Application Submission Policies
    • Clinical Trial Requirements+
      • Clinical Trial Definition
      • Why the Changes
      • Good Clinical Practice
      • Specific Funding Opportunities
      • New Form
      • Single IRB Policy
      • Protocol Template
      • Registration and Reporting
    • NIH Funding Strategies
    • Human Subjects Research
    • Intellectual Property Policy
    • Lobbying Guidance for Grantee Activities
    • Early Stage and Early Established Investigator Policies
    • Peer Review Policies and Practices
    • Public Access
    • Research Integrity
    • Anti-Sexual Harassment
    • Sharing Policies
Home  »   Policy & Compliance   »  Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare   »  Innovative, But Not Compliant
Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare
Protocol Review
Jerald Silverman, DVM, Column Coordinator

Discussion Forum

Current Discussion


Innovative, But Not Compliant

To the Editor:

The NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) and USDA/APHIS, Animal Care (AC) have reviewed the February 2001 Lab Animal article, "An Innovative IACUC Protocol System" by Katie Traxel [30(2):32-35]. We recognize the many positive innovative and burden-reducing elements in the system (for example, the Investigator's Web). We also recognize that there are circumstances under which the PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (PHS Policy) and/or the Animal Welfare Act Regulations (AWAR) do not apply. Nevertheless, both OLAW and AC find elements of the system, as described, to be noncompliant with the federal requirements for protocol review.

Because many readers of Lab Animal are subject to these federal requirements, we believe that clarification of these inconsistencies is essential. Relatively minor modifications of the described system could be made to make it fully compliant.

Under the PHS Policy and AWAR there are only two protocol review modelsfull-committee review and designated-reviewer review. The "Innovative IACUC Protocol System" (IS) appears to be a hybrid of these two review methods, and fails to fully satisfy the requirements of either system.

The IS does not meet the full committee review model because full review must occur in real-time and with a convened quorum of the IACUC participating (see ILAR Journal 37(4):190-192; https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/ilar95.htm).

Under the designated-reviewer model, all members must be given the opportunity to call for full-committee review of a given protocol. This step appears to have been omitted in the IS. Designated reviewer(s) may only "approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or request full committee review" Designated reviewers do not vote. If the IS is attempting to follow the designated reviewer model, with all members being treated as designated reviewers, then every member must respond with one of the above three options. Under these circumstances, a quorum of designated reviewers approving the protocol is not sufficient and approval by all is required. If modification occurs at any stage of the review, all designated reviewers must see and approve the changes.

Other elements of the article require further clarification to determine whether they are compliant. It is unclear what role the IACUC Coordinator has in editing the IACUCs comments. Modification of the official record of review would seem to be highly inappropriate. Regarding the final approval role of the Coordinator, if it is simply administrative ("clicking the button"), then we recommend it be so stated.

The statement that the Coordinator may assign the protocol to veterinarians or safety personnel implies that these individuals might not be involved otherwise, and that the Coordinator would be referring the protocol to a veterinarian other than the one on the IACUC. Elsewhere, it is stated that protocols are not designated to specific reviewers. This appears to be contradictory.

In order to modify the IS to conform with federal requirements, it is first necessary to clearly recognize which mode of review (full or designated) is being emulated. The appropriate procedures, in the required sequence, can then be designed into the system. In this case, such modifications would appear to be minor and would not substantially diminish the intended benefits of the IS. We would be pleased to collaborate in the design of model electronic protocol review systems that are consistent with PHS/USDA requirements.

Nelson L. Garnett, DVM, Director, NIH, Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare W. Ron DeHaven, DVM, Deputy Administrator, USDA, APHIS, Animal Care

Editor's note: As stated above, the article in question was meant to showcase how one facility is attempting to reduce time and effort through an innovative online system. We regret that editing changes might have created the impression that the system is fully compliant, and appreciate that OLAW and USDA/APHIS took this opportunity to clarify federal policy and regulation regarding this important matter.

Director, Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare
Office of Extramural Research,
Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health
RKL 1, Suite 360
6705 Rockledge Dr .
Bethesda , MD 20892-7982
(For express or hand-delivered mail use zip code 20817)
Telephone (301) 496-7163
olaw@od.nih.gov

This page last updated on August 6, 2004 
Content Manager: olaw@od.nih.gov 
Technical Issues: E-mail OER Webmaster   

Back to Top
  • Contact Us
  • Bookmark & Share
  • E-mail Updates
  • RSS Feed
  • Podcast
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

  • Search
  • Help Downloading Files
  • Disclaimer
  • Older Versions of this Page
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility
  • HHS Vulnerability Disclosure
  • FOIA
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Grants.gov
  • USA.gov - Government Made Easy


  • National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

  • NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health