INITIATIVE FOR MINORITY STUDENTS: BRIDGES TO THE DOCTORATE Release Date: August 16, 1999 RFA: GM-99-011 National Institute of General Medical Sciences Letter of Intent Receipt Date: September 15, 1999 Application Receipt Date: October 21, 1999 PURPOSE The National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) and the Office of Research on Minority Health (ORMH), National Institutes of Health (NIH), reannounce two research initiatives directed at increasing the number of underrepresented minorities entering careers in biomedical research. The programs target two different underrepresented minority student populations - those in colleges and universities offering only Master of Science (M.S.) degree programs in biomedically-related sciences and those in two-year junior or community colleges. These have been identified as two key transition points for students considering careers in biomedical research. This is the seventh year of this program which seeks to encourage the development of new and innovative programs and the expansion of existing programs to improve the academic competitiveness of underrepresented minority students and facilitate their transition into the next stage towards careers in biomedical research. This Request for Applications (RFA) solicits new applications for partnership programs involving institutions awarding the M.S. degree and universities awarding the Ph.D. degree. A separate RFA (GM-99-010), describes a program targeting the transition from two-year colleges awarding the Associate's degree to institutions awarding the Baccalaureate degree. Former applicants of unfunded Bridge proposals are encouraged to submit revised applications that respond to the prior concerns of the National Advisory General Medical Sciences Council. HEALTH PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Health People 2000," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This Request for Applications (RFA), Initiative for Minority Students: Bridges to the Baccalaureate Degree, is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Health People 2000" at http://www.crisny.org/health/us/health7.html. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS General Applications may be submitted by domestic, private and public, educational institutions. State or local systems of higher education (also hereinafter referred to as institutions) may submit applications as well. An institution may be involved as a partner institution in more than one Bridge Program, but can be the APPLICANT institution for only one Bridges to the Baccalaureate Degree and one Bridges to the Doctoral Degree Program. Institutions with NIGMS Bridge Program (R25) awards ending on or before September 2000 may submit competing continuation applications for up to five years of continued support (see RFA GM-99-012 available from NIGMS staff listed under INQUIRIES). An institution or system of higher education may submit ONLY ONE application for this RFA. Institutions that submit applications in response to this RFA may also apply for support for a Bridge to the Baccalaureate Degree (RFA GM- 99-010) if they meet the eligibility requirements. However, a separate application for each RFA is required. Institutions submitting their own applications may participate in programs with other applicant institutions so long as these interactions are consistent with institutional resources and their institutional plans. Institutions participating in more than one application should provided a justification for each. Programs developed or modified under this initiative must be specifically designed to target underrepresented minority graduate students majoring in the sciences, including the natural, physical, and behavioral sciences, information sciences, and mathematics. For purposes of this RFA, underrepresented minority students are individuals belonging to a particular ethnic or racial group that has been determined by the grantee institution to be underrepresented in biomedical or behavioral research. Historically, individuals who have been found to be uderrepresented in biomedical or behavioral research include, but are not limited to, U.S. citizens who are African American, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans and natives of the U.S. Pacific Islands. Applications must include a partnership between an institution which offers the M.S. degree as the only post-graduate degree in the sciences within the participating departments AND has a significant enrollment of underrepresented minorities, and one research university providing Ph.D. degree programs in areas relevant to the biomedical sciences. All applications must involve a partnership of at least two colleges or universities, but may involve a consortium of several institutions and may include several institutions within a single state system. One participating institution must be designated as the applicant institution, must name the program director and must submit the application. Each participating institution must name one individual to act as its program coordinator. Proposals must include a description of the collaborative arrangement with all participating institutions. Institutions offering both the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees may not use funds from this program for graduates of their own M.S. degree programs to enter their own Ph.D. degree programs, even if the student is moving from one department, school, or college to another. The program seeks to promote and enhance partnerships BETWEEN institutions. For additional requirements see: SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS MECHANISM OF SUPPORT General Awards under this RFA will use the institutional education project (R25) grant. Responsibility for the planning, direction, and execution of the proposed project will be solely that of the applicant. The total project period for applications submitted in response to this RFA may not exceed two years. Requested direct costs are not to exceed $400,000 for the two-year period. Indirect costs will be paid at 8% of the direct costs, minus appropriate exclusions. A budget for each year should be provided. This RFA is a one-time solicitation. Future unsolicited competing applications will not be accepted. Allowable Costs If appropriate, the budget request may be divided into two phases. The planning phase provides for minor adjustment and/or refinement of the partnership program (not intended to serve as an opportunity to make major changes to the plan approved by peer review). The planning phase costs should be minimal and not exceed a period of six months. The implementation phase includes the costs of administering and coordinating the partnership program within and between each of the participating institutions. Faculty release time for planning and implementation of the program and faculty travel related to program development may be requested. Requests for equipment, supplies, travel, and other expenses should be limited to those necessary for program development and must be carefully and specifically justified. Requests for funds to implement an evaluation plan, including salaries, consultant fees, technical assistance, and travel are also allowable. The budget should include travel funds for the Program Director, a grants manager from the grantee institution, and the program coordinators from the participating institutions to travel to the Bridges Program Meeting each budget year. Each participating institution is responsible for data acquisition and data entry into E-STAR each year. E-STAR (Electronic Student Tracking and Reporting) is a program developed by NIGMS to facilitate the administration and evaluation of this program by the grantees and the agency. The budget should also include funds to defray the costs of data entry. Access to E-STAR will be through Internet and the World Wide Web (minimum computer needs for E-STAR: an IBM-compatible 386 with 4 meg of RAM, with Microsoft Windows(tm) 3.1 and WIN32S or a Macintosh 68020 with 4 meg of RAM; a 14.4 kb/s modem, and internet access. Any computer with Netscape will work). Student remuneration is limited to underrepresented minorities matriculated at the MS partner institution(s) and may include salary/wages and/or other forms of compensation paid in lieu of wages for participation in research experiences. Tuition remission (or other forms of compensation paid in lieu of wages) expenditures are allowable provided the following conditions are met: o the student is performing necessary work, o there is an employer-employee relationship between the student and the institution, o the total compensation is reasonable for the work performed, and o it is the institution's practice to provide compensation for all students in similar circumstances, regardless of the source of support for the activity. In summary, allowable costs include, but are not limited to, tuition remission, supplies, equipment, travel, other expenses, salary, wages, and fringe benefits for students and faculty. UNALLOWABLE COSTS: Stipends, housing, food, tuition (unless as stated above), and fees are not allowable costs under this program. FUNDS AVAILABLE An estimated total of $9.7 million will be available for the term of the awards made in response to this solicitation, RFA GM-99-010, and applications for competing continuations, RFA GM-99-012. NIH staff anticipate making a combined total of 20 to 40 new and competing continuation awards for these RFAs, if NIH receives sufficient numbers of highly meritorious applications and sufficient funds for this purpose. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background This program seeks to promote the initiation and development of new transitional programs, as well as the expansion and enhancement of existing programs between those institutions with departments offering only the Master's degree as the graduate academic degree in the sciences, and that have significant enrollments of underrepresented minority students, and research universities with Ph.D. degree programs. The objective is to facilitate the transition of underrepresented minority graduate students into Ph.D. programs after obtaining their M.S. degree. Students receiving their M.S. degree in one field of science may pursue a Ph.D. in a different area so long as it is in a discipline related to the biomedical sciences. Collaborative agreements should take the form that best fits the needs and situations of the institutions involved. The challenge for the program director, with the help of the participating partners, is to design a new partnership program, or enhance an existing program, that will focus attention and adequate resources to the M.S.-granting institution(s) to enhance the academic competitiveness of their degree programs and graduates in the sciences. Additional Information These transition programs must be designed with special attention to the needs and special requirements of the underrepresented minority graduate students enrolled in the M.S. degree program. They may include, but are not limited to, the following elements: o providing research opportunities for M.S. students at the Ph.D. institution or in private industrial laboratories (students may receive compensation for these activities); o establishing a mentoring program for M.S. students with faculty at the Ph.D. institution; o strengthening the research capability of the M.S. institution (e.g., by faculty research collaborations, joint seminar programs, etc.); o enhancing the curriculum of the M.S. institution (special courses, seminars, etc.); o enabling and encouraging students from either institution to take classes at the other institution; o academic counseling for M.S. students, with a particular focus on encouraging students to pursue research careers in the biomedical sciences. o nontraditional or other professional degree-granting institutions should describe those modifications or additions to their programs that would encourage and facilitate Bridge students to enter research careers. It is an expectation of NIGMS and ORMH that students who enter Ph.D. programs as a result of this enhancement program will receive support, if needed, while progressing satisfactorily in Ph.D. research training programs. Applicants should describe the type(s) of institutional support that would be available to such students. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Applicants should describe the proposed transition program in detail and explain how its design will meet the goals of this initiative. Applicants should describe the criteria to be used in the selection and retention of the student participants as well as the criteria for selecting participating faculty. Applicants with an existing transition program should describe that program and explain how it would be altered to meet the goals of this initiative. Applicants should describe the methods and facilities available for tracking student participants. Evaluation Institutions should note that evaluation is now a mandatory component of every Bridges to the Future Program. Each applicant institution must set its own specific goals and measurable objectives. The NIGMS recognizes that minority and minority-serving institutions have diverse missions, opportunities, and environments. Therefore, the emphasis of the evaluation activities of the Bridges to the Future Program will be on improvement as defined in the specific goals and measurable objectives which the applicant institution sets for itself. Central to each application are (1) a clear statement of program and institutional goals and (2) a set of measurable objectives which track progress toward those goals, (3) a plan for evaluating whether or not those objectives have been met, and (4) a measure of the efficacy of specific interventions. Unified Plan If an institution is involved in more than one Bridge Program, the applicant or the institution's program coordinator must describe how the various Bridge Programs interact and are consistent with the overall goals of the program. Institutions with active or pending NIH grants for the Support for Continuous Research Excellence (SCORE), Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement (RISE), or Minority Access to Research Careers (MARC programs or with other sources of funds, such as the National Science Foundation or the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, may also apply to the Bridges to the future program. The application must describe how the programs complement each other and how the students and faculty supported by each will interact. Consortium Agreements Each applicant institution should delineate appropriate agreements and consortium arrangements with other institutions consistent with its own unified institutional plan. The following statement, accompanied by signatures of the appropriate administrative officials from EACH of the collaborating institutions, must be included as part of the application: "THE APPROPRIATE PROGRAMMATIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL OF EACH INSTITUTION INVOLVED IN THIS GRANT APPLICATION ARE AWARE OF THE NIH CONSORTIUM GRANT POLICY AND ARE PREPARED TO ESTABLISH THE NECESSARY INTER-INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT(S) CONSISTENT WITH THAT POLICY." In addition, letters, signed by the appropriate institutional official and program coordinator, acknowledging participation in the program are required from each participating institution. Information on NIH policy regarding consortium agreements can be found at https://grants.nih.gov/archive/grants/policy/nihgps/part_iii_5.htm#Consortium. Reporting Requirements A progress report will be required at the end of the planning phase (if any) or at the end of the first year, whichever is shorter. A final report will be required 90 days after the termination date of the award and must include information for each student participant (E-STAR may be used to satisfy part of these requirements) and a summary of the impact of the program. Student Population and Career Tracking The applicant should also describe the M.S. institution's success in training its students in the sciences, including information on the numbers of minority students receiving the M.S. degree and data on subsequent careers or education of their graduates. The applicant should describe a system by which it would monitor and track the students participating in this program, including their future careers, in order to evaluate the success of the program. The applicant should maintain data to be able to demonstrate the benefits of this program on retention rates, graduation rates, transfer rates to the next higher degree program, and graduation rates from the next higher degree programs. These data should be compared to those of the non-minority students and the minority students that were not in the bridges program. E-STAR may be used to satisfy part of these requirements. A printout or other format of the data will be necessary because review groups will not have access to E-STAR. LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are requested to submit by, September 15, 1999, a letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed plan, the name, address, and telephone number of the program director, the identities of other key personnel and participating institutions, and the number and title of the RFA. Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information that it contains is helpful in planning for the review of applications. It allows NIH staff to estimate the potential review workload and to avoid conflict of interest in the review. The letter of intent is to be sent to the program director listed under INQUIRIES. APPLICATION PROCEDURES The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 4/98) is to be used in applying for these grants. These forms are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research; from the Division of Extramural Outreach and Information Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive MSC 7910, Bethesda, MD 20892-7910, telephone (301) 710-0267; email: grantsinfo@nih.gov. The forms are also available on at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html The RFA label in the PHS 398 application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the application. Failure to use this label could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. In addition, the RFA number and title must be typed on line 2 of the face page form, the "YES" box must be marked. The RFA label and line 2 of the application should both indicate the RFA number. The sample RFA label available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/label-bk.pdf has been modified to allow for this change. Please note this is in pdf format. Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the Checklist, and five photocopies of the signed application in one package to: CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 6701 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE, SUITE 1040, MSC 7710 BETHESDA, MD 20892-7710 BETHESDA, MD 20817 (for express/courier service) Applications must be received by October 21, 1999. Applications postmarked after that date will be returned to the applicant. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Upon receipt, applications will be administratively reviewed by NIH staff. Incomplete and/or unresponsive applications will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. Those applications that are complete and responsive will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria stated below for scientific and technical merit by appropriate peer review groups. The second level of review will be provided by the National Advisory General Medical Sciences Council. Review criteria: The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In the written comments, reviewers will be asked to discuss the following aspects of the application in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed and considered in assigning the overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. Note that the application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move a field forward. (1) Significance: If the aims of the program are achieved, what impact will they have on the diversity of the scientific workforce? Is a thorough evaluation plan, including specific goals and measurable objectives, in place? (2) Approach: Is the program adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? Does the program make good use of the skills and resources at the participating institutions? (3) Innovation: Does the project employ novel approaches or methods to recruiting, retaining, training, or mentoring students? Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? (4) Investigator: Is the program director appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Does the program director have the necessary leadership skills? Do the program director and coordinators have the qualifications and experience to carry out the proposed program? (5) Environment: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Is there evidence of institutional commitment for each institution? Is the strength of the collaborations sufficient to foster professional training of underrepresented minority students? (6) Pool Size: Are there sufficient numbers of underrepresented minority students in the participating science departments who are interested in studying further in biomedical science? Is there evidence that underrepresented minority students at the participating institutions progress to higher education? (7) Administration: Is the proposed system for tracking program participants adequate to monitor the effectiveness of the program? Is the administrative plan, including adequacy of space and other resources, adequate? AWARD CRITERIA The anticipated date of award is July 1, 2000. Award decisions will be based on the technical merit of the applications, the geographical distribution of the awardee institutions, and diversity of underrepresented minority student participants. Awards can be made only to institutions with financial management systems and management capabilities that are acceptable under NIH policy. Awards will be administered under the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Schedule Letter of Intent Receipt Date: September 15, 1999 Application Receipt Date: October 21, 1999 Council Review: May 2000 Earliest Anticipated Start Date: July 1, 2000 INQUIRIES Written and telephone inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to: Irene Eckstrand, Ph.D. National Institute of General Medical Sciences 45 Center Drive, Room 2AS-25K, MSC 6200 Bethesda, MD 20892-6200 Telephone: (301) 594-0943 FAX: (301) 480-2228 Email: EckstraI@nigms.nih.gov Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Bryan Clark Grants Management Specialist National Institute of General Medical Sciences 45 Center Drive, Room 2AN.44C MSC 6200 Bethesda, MD 20892-6200 Telephone: 301-594-3915 Fax: 301-480-3423 Email: ClarkB@nigms.nih.gov AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.93.960, Special Minority Initiatives Program. Awards are authorized by sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act, as amended, and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations 45 CFR Part 74 or 45 CFR Part 92. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. The PHS strongly encourages all grant and contract recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
![]() |
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
![]() |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
![]() |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
![]() |
||||