HEPATITIS C COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTERS Release Date: May 26, 1999 RFA: AI-99-007 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Institute of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse National Institute of Drug Abuse Letter of Intent Receipt Date: August 1, 1999 Application Receipt Date: November 24, 1999 APPLICATIONS IN RESPONSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS (RFA) MUST BE PREPARED USING SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS IN AN NIAID BROCHURE ENTITLED "INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICATIONS FOR MULTI-PROJECT AWARDS" (APRIL 1999). PURPOSE The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases NIDDK), the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), and the National Institute of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA) invite applications for the establishment of multi-project or single-project Hepatitis C Cooperative Research Centers (HC CRCs). The purpose of this RFA is to stimulate high quality, multidisciplinary, innovative yet systematic, collaborative research on hepatitis C virus (HCV). Such clinical and basic research is meant to provide further understanding of the stages and manifestations of hepatitis C infection, disease, and recovery. The HC CRCs also will have a mandate to build on new findings to explore new vaccine and therapy strategies. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a DHHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This RFA, Hepatitis C Cooperative Research Centers (HC CRCs), is related to the priority area of immunization and infectious diseases. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" at http://www.crisny.org/health/us/health7.html. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Research grant applications may be submitted by domestic for-profit and non- profit organizations, public and private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government. Foreign organizations are not eligible to apply but may be part of a collaborative arrangement. Racial/ethnic minority individuals, women, and persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply as Principal Investigators. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT The administrative and funding mechanism to be used to undertake this program will be the Cooperative Agreement (single project U01 or multi-project U19), an "assistance" mechanism, rather than an "acquisition" mechanism, in which substantial NIH scientific and/or programmatic involvement with the awardee is anticipated during performance of the activity. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and/or stimulate the recipient's activity by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipient in a partner role, but it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activity. Details of the responsibilities, relationships, and governance of a study funded under cooperative agreement(s) are discussed later in this document under the section Terms and Conditions of Award. The cooperative agreement-funding instrument can support HC CRC awards of either a multi-project program or a single project program, and both types of applications will be considered by NIAID. Single project applications should focus on a hypothesis driven discrete, circumscribed objective. Essential elements of the Multi-project Cooperative Agreement mechanism include: (1) a minimum of three inter-related individual research projects organized around a central theme; (2) collaborative efforts and interaction among independent projects and their investigators to achieve a common goal; (3) a single Principal Investigator who will be scientifically and administratively responsible for the group effort; (4) a single applicant institution that will be legally and financially responsible for the use and disposition of funds awarded; and (5)support provided, as necessary, for "core" resources or facilities, each of which is expected to be utilized by at least two research projects in order to facilitate the research efforts. Applications for multi-project programs should describe in detail their organizational and administrative structure. Whereas multi-project programs may take advantage of the "core" mechanisms to provide support for common resources (e.g., laboratory or clinical facilities), it is understood that support for such facilities will be included in the budget of a single project application as required. HC CRCs may involve collaboration among investigators at several institutions. These consortium arrangements should follow the NIH Guide outline in "Guidelines for Establishing and Operating Consortium Grants, January 1989." These are available from the individuals listed under INQUIRIES. The total project period for applications submitted in response to this RFA may not exceed 5 years. At this time, the NIAID has not determined whether and how this solicitation will be continued beyond the present RFA. If, by the end of the third year of the award, the NIAID has not announced its intent, due to budget uncertainties to reissue the RFA, incumbents should contact program staff to seek advice on the most appropriate method of application submission before preparing a recompeting application. FUNDS AVAILABLE The estimated total funds (direct and F&A costs) available for the first year of support for all HC CRC awards made under this RFA will be $4.4 million. The final number of awards to be made is dependent upon the availability of funds. In Fiscal Year 2000, the NIAID plans to fund approximately four to eight awards -- the variability dependent upon both the nature (U01 or U19) and size of the awards. The NIDDK, NIDA, and NIAAA each intend to fund one single- project award. The initial year's total costs, including direct and F&A costs, should not exceed $750,000 for each multi-project award and $250,000 for a single-project award. Exceptions to this budget limit must be discussed and approved by Dr. Leslye Johnson. (See Inquiries below.) The usual NIH policies governing grants administration and management will apply. Although this program is provided for in the financial plans of the NIAID, NIDDK, NIDA and NIAAA, awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the availability of funds for this purpose and the receipt of a sufficient number of applications of high scientific merit. Funding beyond the first and subsequent years of the grant will be contingent upon satisfactory progress during the preceding years and availability of funds. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background Hepatitis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is classified as an emerging infectious disease (IOM Report, 1992). After the cloning and sequencing of HCV about ten years ago, investigators identified HCV as the most important etiological agent of non-A, non-B hepatitis and its associated chronic liver disease. HCV infection and disease disproportionately affect African-Americans and Hispanics. The incidence of HCV infection has fallen from a peak of 150,000 in the late 1980's to approximately 30,000 in recent years. The major risks of transmission stem from percutaneous exposure to blood and multiple sexual partners. For a small percentage of individuals the source of infection remains unidentified. Approximately 1.8% of Americans - 4 million people - are persistently infected with HCV, i.e., are chronic carriers. The same 1-2 percent carrier rate is true around the world with the exception of a few high endemicity areas such as some inner city areas in the U.S., Egypt, the Sudan, and isolated villages in Asia. In the U.S. the total direct and time lost cost for HCV infection and chronic sequelae is estimated at $1.5 billion per year. The course of infection and disease is variable at an individual level. In general, the initial infection is often asymptomatic. Recovery from infection is exceedingly rare and estimates are that 85% of those infected become persistently infected, i.e., chronic carriers. Infection progresses to liver cirrhosis in 20-30% of individuals after about two decades of persistent infection. For others progression is either slower or muted. Since identification of HCV, considerable progress has been made. Molecular biological techniques have enabled investigators to: 1) clone, sequence and identify HCV genotypes and explore the importance of quasispecies; 2) identify several viral proteins, how they are made, and their functions; and 3) probe pathogenesis. Diagnostic tools have been developed that have been instrumental in: 1) verifying the agent causing liver disease in symptomatic patients as well as identifying asymptomatic patients; 2) preventing transmission in transfusion, transplantation and hemodialysis patients; and 3) identifying important cofactors for infection and disease progression. There are efforts ongoing to explore and quantify modes of transmission such as from mother to infant, from tattooing and body piercing and between monogamous sexual partners. Studies of (immuno) pathogenesis and viral replication are beginning. Despite these advances, infection and disease caused by HCV remain enigmatic. Available therapies - various interferons as well as interferon alpha in combination with ribavirin - are woefully inadequate and have considerable associated toxicity. Research is needed to further explore viral replication strategies, pathogenesis and disease outcomes, as well as to define possible new therapeutic strategies. Prevention of infection and disease, such as that possible with vaccines for other infectious agents, is currently impossible and there are numerous obstacles. One stems from the inadequate immune response to natural infection -- viral clearance is exceedingly rare even though neutralizing antibodies have recently been detected. The large number of HCV genotypes and their high rate of mutation as well as the existence of genetic variants, i.e., "quasispecies", also pose obstacles both to prevention and treatment. Largely unexplored are such areas as the: 1) intricate host-viral interactions that define recovery from and persistence of HCV infection; 2) role of host genetics in outcome, 3) pathogenesis, 4) protective mechanisms keeping disease at a minimum; 5) natural history and progression of disease, and 6) the impact of co-infection, drug and alcohol use, and immunosuppression. Finally, access to resources such as model systems and adequately sized patient populations is difficult. Vaccination to prevent infection and therapeutic strategies to cure or ameliorate persistent infection and disease are necessary to derive the greatest benefit for those at risk and affected respectively. For diseases like hepatitis B they have been shown to be highly cost-effective. Thus in this RFA, the NIAID and other participating Institutes are interested in research focused on acute and persistent disease or the role of alcohol, drugs, and co-infections in the progression rather than on liver failure or cancer therapy. Research Objectives and Scope This RFA seeks to support state-of-the-art, innovative research on hepatitis C virus. Using integrated approaches from multiple disciplines, the HC CRCs will serve as foci for generating the knowledge needed to further understanding of HCV infection, recovery, and pathogenesis. Building on this knowledge, the sponsoring ICs anticipate that the HC CRCs will devise original preventive and therapeutic interventions. The NIAID, NIDDK, NIDA and NIAAA expect clinical issues and needs to be a strong driving force for research performed by the HC CRCs and hopes to support research utilizing well-characterized clinical populations and/or their specimens. The NIAID also encourages research using available animal model systems including the chimpanzee and/or research specimens from them. The NIH is emphasizing the research areas identified below. However, applicants are not limited only to these areas. A central focus is the host-virus interface, an area crucial for understanding the immunology and pathogenesis of HCV infection and disease. There is an important balance struck between HCV and the host; this balance point set is critical for both infection outcome and disease activity. Hence, it is important to identify the host and viral factors/variables/ markers, e.g., viral sequence and variability, host genetics, etc. and to explore mechanisms: o associated with and responsible for natural recovery from acute infection and/or chronic infection; o of protective vs. injurious host responses especially immune responses as well as epitopes, etc. required for protective immunity; o of responses, especially immune responses, to repeat infections; o of recovery and non-recovery from chronic infection during treatment with various therapies; o involved in gender and racial/ethnic differences in susceptibility to and outcomes of infection; o of pathogenesis; o involved in moving from asymptomatic to symptomatic infection determining outcome and timing of disease progression including the impact of co-factors such as alcohol, injection drug use and co-infection; and o that cause and exacerbate liver disease. Research to enhance the understanding of immunological and pathological events in the liver is encouraged. With respect to the virus, it remains important to continue to: o develop an understanding of viral replication o identify key viral functions and conduct structure-function studies. The use of infectious clones or virus in animal models such as the chimpanzee currently is crucial to: o study immune responses and pathogenesis, and o investigate the relationship between specific viral sequences and infectivity, immune responses, pathogenesis and natural history. Investigation is still hampered by the lack of model systems. Hence, there is continued interest in developing small animal model and in vitro systems with relevance to basic research on recovery, persistence, pathogenesis, protective immunity, co-factors, and replication as well as applied research on therapies and vaccines. Of particular interest are infectious models that reproduce the full spectrum of human disease. In order to hasten the application of information gained from basic and clinical research to health care advances, this RFA encourages translational research for purposes including, but not limited to, development of: o diagnostic tools or markers to determine the outcome of acute infection, i.e., recovery vs. persistence as well as chronic infection, i.e., severity and timing of progression; o surrogate correlates of protection; o multiple vaccine types so as to protect broadly from infection and disease and/or to promote recovery from acute or chronic infection; o intervention strategies to broaden or enhance protective immunity or subvert persistence mechanisms; o surrogate endpoints of recovery from chronic infection and liver disease; and o new therapeutic approaches aimed at recovery from persistent infection. Relevant Disciplines In order to foster multidisciplinary research, each multi-project HC CRC should include broad approaches from a range of disciplines such as virology, immunology, cell and tissue biology, pathogenesis, clinical infection and disease, model system development, and applied research. Clinical Capability In order to undertake basic and clinical approaches in a complementary and synergistic manner, HC CRCs will need access to well-characterized and diverse patient samples and clinical experience with populations representing different disease stages, transmission modes, racial/ethnic background, co- factors, etc. All applicants are encouraged to include research utilizing human subjects to address research questions and validate basic research findings. The value of such basic research and clinical studies performed is directly related to the care exercised in selection and characterization of cases and controls. It is expected that HC CRCs investigators would provide samples to other investigators in order to enhance overall research efforts. Access to and experience with patient populations also will facilitate new vaccine and therapy development. NIAID, NIDDK, NIDA and NIAAA encourage: 1) collaborative arrangements with on-going studies or clinical care capable of providing the crucial patient populations, specimens and information; and 2) use of General Clinical Research Centers (GCRC) facilities supported by the NIH National Center for Research Resources as a resource for conducting research. If existing studies/cohorts or GCRC facilities will be used, letters of collaboration or agreement from the study PI or GCRC Program Director respectively must be included in the application material. HC CRC award funds may be utilized to support the following research-related activities: Optional Developmental Fund for Pilot Projects: NIAID strongly encourages multi-project U19 HC CRCs applications to include a request for a Developmental Fund. (Single project U01 applicants are not eligible.) This option sets aside and restricts funds solely to cover partial salary and research costs for pilot projects. Such pilot projects might develop methods or resources capable of enhancing basic and clinical research progress, follow-up on new observations and hypotheses, or perform short term high risk - high benefit research. It is envisioned that availability of funds for pilot studies will increase flexibility and responsiveness to important new technologies, scientific observations and opportunities and medical research findings. It will also permit entry of new investigators into the field and allow for the collection of preliminary data needed for submission of R01s. (See below: "APPLICATION PROCEDURES" for more details on the preparation of requests.) Pilot studies need not be restricted to the awardee institution. IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT PILOT STUDIES AWARDED FROM THE DEVELOPMENTAL FUND ARE DISTINCT FROM INDIVIDUAL HC CRC RESEARCH PROJECTS. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Terms and Conditions of Award The following terms and conditions will be incorporated into the award statement and provided to the Program Director as well as the institutional official at the time of award. These special Terms of Award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS Grant Administration Regulations at 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92, and other HHS, and NIH Grant Administration policy statements. The administrative and funding instrument used for this program is the Multi- project (U19) or Single-project (U01) Cooperative Agreement or, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH scientific and/or programmatic involvement with the awardee is anticipated during the performance of the activity. Under the Multi-project Cooperative Agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and/or stimulate the recipient's activity by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipient in a partner role, but it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activity. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility for the activity resides with the awardees for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities in carrying out the research will be shared among the awardees and the NIAID coordinator. Awards will be made to an institution on behalf of a Program Director who will be responsible for the coordination of HC CRC scientific and administrative activities. Support of all HC CRC activities will be coordinated through a Central Operations Office located within the applicant organization. 1. Awardee Rights and Responsibilities Awardees will have primary responsibility for defining the research objective, approaches and details for the project within the guidelines of the RFA and for performing the scientific activity. Awardees agree to accept close coordination, cooperation, and participation of NIAID staff in all aspects of scientific and technical management of the project as stated below under NIAID Staff Responsibilities. Awardees will retain custody of and have primary rights to the data developed under these awards, subject to Government rights to access consistent with current HHS, PHS and NIH policies. Under the Cooperative Agreement, a partnership relationship exists between the recipient of the award and NIAID in which successful applicants are responsive to the guidelines and conditions set forth in the RFA. At the same time, investigators are expected to define research objectives and approaches in accord with their own interests and perceptions of novel and exploitable approaches to the research which ultimately is likely to result in improved prevention and control of hepatitis C. It is the primary responsibility of the Program Director to clearly state the objectives and approaches of the research, to plan and conduct the research stipulated in the proposal, and to ensure that the results obtained are analyzed and published in a timely manner. NIAID may periodically review and generate internal reports from data and progress reports developed under this cooperative agreement. The data obtained will, however, be the property of the awardee. The multi-disciplinary and collaborative nature of the HC CRCs creates an extraordinary opportunity for information exchange and scientific advancement in hepatitis C research. Program Directors are expected to take advantage of this opportunity by participation in both formal events established expressly for this purpose and informal investigator-initiated dialogues. 2. NIAID Staff Responsibilities The NIAID will have substantial scientific/programmatic involvement during the conduct of this activity, through technical assistance, advice and coordination above and beyond normal program stewardship for grants, as described below. The NIAID will work closely with the Program Directors and shall be represented by the Scientific Coordinator (Program Officer). The Scientific Coordinator will be the Hepatitis Program Officer in the Enteric and Hepatic Diseases Branch of NIAID. During the award period, the NIAID Scientific Coordinator may provide appropriate assistance, advice, and guidance in: o overall design of studies, e.g., prospective or intervention especially those undertaken jointly by the HC CRCs, o linkage to special populations and vaccine production facilities funded through NIAID contracts, NIAID's data collection and analysis contracts, NIAID's repository contract, and staff capabilities with respect to Master File and IND filing, o coordination and facilitation of information, technology, reagent and pedigree specimen exchange between HC CRCs themselves and other grantees and contractors o assistance in review and selection of developmental fund awardees; and o technical and administrative activities of HC CRCs. However, it is again emphasized that the role of NIAID will be to facilitate and not to direct the activities of the HC CRCs. It is anticipated that decisions in all activities outlined within this RFA will be reached by consensus of the investigators and that the NIAID Scientific Coordinator will be given the opportunity to offer input to this process. 3. Collaborative Responsibilities The HC CRC Program Directors and NIAID Scientific Coordinator will form a Steering Committee that will meet at the NIH in Bethesda, Maryland (or at a site designated by NIAID) twice a year. Its functions include, but are not limited to: tracking and reviewing activities/progress over the six months between meetings, planning for the next six months and beyond, maintaining focus, and developing collaborative efforts. Issues for discussion and agendas will be a collaborative responsibility. The first such meeting will occur shortly Post Award. Three times during the project period and in conjunction with a semi-annual steering committee or other pertinent meeting, workshops for the Program Directors and Project Leaders will be convened to share hepatitis C research advances, to discuss research needs and opportunities, and to develop collaborations. It is likely that workshops will be convened towards the end of Years 1-3 of the project period at the NIH in Bethesda, Maryland (or at a site designated by NIAID). A critical element of the HC CRCs' success is the degree of communication among its members. Therefore, additional informal meetings among participants from different HC CRCs as well as regular telephone and written communication will be encouraged. Special Consideration: In the event that research supported by the Cooperative Agreement results in development of a therapeutic or other medical intervention, NIAID will retain the option to cross-file or independently file an application for an investigational clinical trial (i.e., an Investigational New Drug Application [IND]) to the United States Food and Drug Administration. To facilitate this, reports of data generated by the HC CRC or any of its members which are required for inclusion in INDs and Clinical Brochures and for cross-filing purposes will be submitted by the Program Director to the Scientific Coordinator upon request. Such reports will be in final draft form and include background information, methods, results, and conclusion. They will be subject to approval and revision by NIAID and may be augmented with test results from other Government sponsored projects prior to submission to the appropriate regulatory agency. 4. Arbitration Any disagreement that may arise on scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between award recipients and the NIAID may be brought to arbitration. An arbitration panel will be composed of three members -- one selected by the Program Director, a second member selected by the NIAID, and the third member with relevant expertise and selected by the two prior members and will be formed to review any scientific or programmatic issue that is significantly restricting progress. While the decisions of the Arbitration Panel are binding, these special arbitration procedures will in no way affect the awardee's right to appeal an adverse action in accordance with PHS regulations at 42 CFR part 50, subpart D, and HHS regulation at 45 CFR part 16. INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS A strong emphasis is placed on studying hepatitis C in populations that are disproportionately affected. These populations include African-Americans and Hispanics. Subjects may be recruited or specimens obtained from domestic sites or through collaborations with foreign institutions if the collaboration is beneficial to the foreign country and offers the potential for collection of hepatitis C data that are pertinent to U.S. populations and could not be generated as effectively in the United States. It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations must be included in all NIH supported biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects, unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification is provided that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research," which have been published in the Federal Register of March 28, 1994 (FR 59 14508-14513) and in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, Volume 23, Number 11, March 18, 1994. Available on the web at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-100.html. Investigators may obtain copies of the policy from these sources or from program staff listed under INQUIRIES who may also provide additional relevant information concerning the policy. INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS It is the policy of NIH that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific or ethical reasons not to included them. The policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for receipt dates after October 1, 1998. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines on the Inclusion of Children as Participants in Research Involving Human Subjects: that was published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, March 6, 1998, and is available at the following URL address: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-024.html LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by August 1, 1999, a letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the overall proposed research, the name, address including institution, and telephone number of the Program Director as well as those of all project leaders and collaborators, and the number and title of this RFA. Although the letter of intent is not required, is not binding, does not commit the sender to submit an application, and does not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information that it contains allows review to estimate the potential review workload and to avoid conflict of interest in the review. The letter of intent is to be sent to Dr. Madelon Halula at the address listed under INQUIRIES. APPLICATION PROCEDURES Applicants for multi-project (U19) grants must follow special application guidelines in the NIAID Brochure entitled INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICATIONS FOR MULTI-PROJECT AWARDS (April 1999); this brochure is available from NIAID staff listed in INQUIRIES below an via the WWW at: http://www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants/multibron.htm Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact program staff listed under INQUIRIES with any questions regarding the responsiveness of their proposed projects to the goals of this RFA. Clinical Capabilities and Laboratory Facilities: In describing the clinical capabilities and laboratory facilities, the application should include specific information on present patient load, projections for patient involvement in future clinical investigations, history of recruitment and study of subjects, and disease category and prevalence as well as on the availability of appropriate biohazard facilities and safety procedures. Collaborative Organization The application should include a plan to maintain close collaboration and communication among members of the HC CRC as well as an organizational chart showing the name, the organization and the scientific discipline of the Program Director, the Project Leaders, and the key personnel for the projects and cores. The application must also include a signed letter of agreement from each collaborator and/or consultant to the program indicating willingness to participate in the program and a description of the exact nature of the participation. Budget and Related Issues Travel: It is expected that HC CRC Program Directors will attend two (2) meetings each year with the NIAID Scientific Director. It is expected that HC CRC Project Leaders will attend HC CRC meetings/workshops three times during the program period. Such meetings will include scientific, technical and administrative topics of interest to the NIAID, Program Directors and Project Leaders. It is anticipated that they will provide greater synergy for the overall HC CRC program. Funds for travel to all meetings must be included in application budget. (See: SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS, Terms and Conditions of Award, 3. Collaborative Responsibilities.) Budget Issues Budget requests within each project may include research-related costs for supplies, patient involvement and medical care that are not covered by the patient's medical insurance plan, funds for limited investigator travel, and costs of publication. Proposals for studies that do not receive the majority of funding through the HC CRC will not be counted as a project but may support a project. There must be concordance between the science proposed and the budget requested. Furthermore, if additional sources of funding have been identified for a project, then letters documenting a funding commitment must be included in the application. The applicant Program Director must commit sufficient time to the administration of the HC CRC. The application must provide a written plan explaining how the Program Director will successfully and fully meet the responsibilities demanded by this endeavor. Developmental Funds Pool (U19 applications only): There is a ceiling of $60,000 per year in direct costs on the dollar amount of the developmental funds pool. Once identified as developmental funds these monies constitute a restricted portion of the total HC CRC budget and will not be available for other HC CRC activities. Funds reserved for pilot projects may not be rebudgeted into other budget categories except in unusual circumstances and following approval from the Grants Management Specialist and the Scientific Coordinator. The size of individual developmental awards is $20,000 and may be used for salary, technical support, laboratory supplies, and small equipment. Supplies and equipment expenditures for each award may not exceed $10,000 annually. Projects and investigators funded under the developmental core may not receive subsequent awards from this pool. The duration of support for each study typically would be one year, but may be up to two years. If the project or investigator achieves independent funding including, but not limited to, a traditional research grant (R01) award prior to the end of the developmental award, pilot study support from the developmental fund must be terminated, and unexpended funds must be returned to the developmental funds pool. Finally, the HC CRC must maintain detailed records of disbursements and expenditures of the Developmental Fund and report on progress. Potential awardees and specific pilot research projects to be pursued need not be identified in the application. However, the application should include a one-page description of the kind of project that might be funded under this mechanism and how it might interdigitate with other CRC projects. The application also must provide a description of the proposed review process and selection criteria for proposed projects. Examples of criteria are scientific merit of the proposal, medical relevance and need for data to advance the research objectives of the HC CRC and the field. It is recommended that a small committee be formed to review, rank and recommend pilot projects. It is also suggested that the committee include local individuals who are not part of the HC CRC but are part of the funded institution(s) and exclude individuals applying for a pilot project. The Scientific Coordinator will review both the proposed studies and the review committee recommendations make specific recommendations for funding. Like all other NIH supported projects studies involving Human Subjects or animals will require prior approval by the Institutional Review Board or the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee respectively. Approval of the developmental funds portion of the application does not in any way commit the program directors to the execution of the sample project. The annual direct costs of the developmental fund should be entered in the OTHER category in the Consolidated Budget (see pages 15 and 21 in the NIAID Multi-project brochure). Before preparing an application, the applicant should carefully read the new information brochure accompanying each RFA, NIAID Program Project Grants and Multi-project Cooperative Agreements (April 1999.) Instructions for formatting the application as outlined in the brochure should be followed carefully. Failure to follow the instructions may result in unnecessary delays in the review process. Applications are to be submitted on the standard research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 4/98). Application kits are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research and may be obtained from the Division of Extramural Outreach and Information Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7910, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892-7910, telephone (301) 710-0267, email: grantsinfo@nih.gov; and on the internet at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html. For purposes of identification and processing, item 2 on the face page of the application must be marked "YES" and the RFA number "AI-99-007" and the words "HEPATITIS C COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTERS HC CRCs)" must be typed in. The RFA label and line 2 of the application should both indicate the RFA number. The RFA label must be affixed to the bottom of the face page. Failure to use this label could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. The sample RFA label available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/label-bk.pdf has been modified to allow for this change. Please note this is in pdf format. Applications from multi-component consortia must contain a single face page, an overall budget page, and separate budget pages for each institution involved. Each consortium institution is allowed 25 pages for the research plan if different plans are proposed by the different member institutions. For additional information, refer to page 13 of the PHS 398 application form. Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the checklist, and three signed, exact, single-sided photocopies, in one package to: CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 6001 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE, ROOM 1040 - MSC 7710 BETHESDA, MD 20892-7710 BETHESDA, MD 20817 (for express/courier service) At the time of submission, two additional exact copies of the grant application and all five sets of appendix material must be sent to Dr. Madelon Halula listed below in INQUIRES. Applications must be received by the official receipt date as indicated in the RFA heading. All components, subparts and sections of the application must be collated into the application, and the packages sent to the CSR and to the NIAID must each be complete in themselves. Applications that are not received as a single package on the receipt date or that do not conform to the instructions contained in PHS 398 (rev. 4/98) Application Kit (as modified and superseded by the special instructions below) will be judged non-responsive and will be returned to the applicant. Current NIH policy permits a component research project of a multiproject grant application to be concurrently submitted as a traditional individual research project (R01) application. If, following review, both the multiproject application and the R01 application are found to be in the fundable range, the investigator must relinquish the R01 and will not have the option to withdraw from the multiproject grant. This is a NIH policy intended to preserve the scientific integrity of a multiproject grant, which may be seriously compromised if a strong component project(s) is removed from the program. Investigators wishing to participate in a multiproject grant must be aware of this policy before making a commitment to the Program Director and awarding institution. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review (CSR) and for responsiveness by NIAID staff; those judged to be incomplete or non-responsive will be returned to the applicant without review. Applications that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened by the NIAID in accordance with the review criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, a streamlining process may be used by the initial review group in which applications receive a written critique and undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of applications under review will be discussed, assigned a priority score, and receive a second level of review by the National Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council. CRITERIA: The general criteria for multi-project (U19) cooperative agreement applications are presented in the NIAID BROCHURE. The criteria to be used in the evaluation of single project applications are listed below. To put those criteria in context, the following information is contained in instructions to the peer reviewers. In addition, applicants are expected to address research priorities, objectives, and other requirements stated in this RFA. Additional language has been added to the basic aims to more closely focus them to the goals of this RFA. The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. The reviewers will comment on the following aspects of the application in their written critiques in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed and considered by the reviewers in assigning the overall score weighting them as appropriate for each application. These criteria are not listed in any order of priority. Note that the application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move a field forward. Significance. Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field? Specifically the understanding of HCV infection, recovery, persistence and pathogenesis. Approach. Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? Is there adequacy in the proposed plan for coordination and communication within the applicant HC CRC and NIAID and other HC CRCs? Are there documentation of integration of research with clinical capability, adequate and appropriate patient populations, disease prevalence, and historical success of recruitment and retention of subjects? Innovation. Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or method? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? Investigator(s). Are the investigator and team (U01) or the Program Director, the Project Leaders and key project and core personnel (U19) appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the principal investigator and other researcher? Environment. Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support? Is there documented sponsoring institution commitment to the cooperative program? The initial review group will also examine: the appropriateness of proposed project budget and duration; the adequacy of plans to include children and both genders and minorities and their subgroups as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research and plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects; the provisions for the protection of human and animal subjects; and the safety of the research environment. AWARD CRITERIA Funding decisions will be made on the basis of scientific and technical merit as determined by peer review, program balance, and the availability of funds. Program balance takes into account the need for multiple approaches and areas of study. The earliest anticipated date of award is August 1, 2000. INQUIRIES Written and telephone inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Direct inquiries regarding programmatic (research scope and eligibility) issues should contact: Dr. Leslye Johnson Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 3A-22 MSC 7630 Bethesda, MD 20892-7630 Telephone: (301) 496-7051 FAX: (301) 402-1456 Email: lj7m@nih.gov Tommie Sue Tralka Clinical Trials Program National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 45 Center Drive, Room 6-AN-12K, MSC 6600 Bethesda, MD 20892-6600 Telephone: (301) 594-8879 Email: tt30m@nih.gov Thomas F. Kresina, Ph.D. Division of Basic Research National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 6000 Executive Boulevard, Suite 402, MSC-7003 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003 Telephone: (301) 443-6537 FAX: (301) 594-0673 Email: tk13v@nih.gov Henry Francis, M.D. Center on AIDS & Other Medical Consequences of Drug Abuse National Institute on Drug Abuse 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 5198, MSC 9593 Bethesda, MD 20892-9593 Telephone: (301) 443-1801 FAX: (301) 594-6566 Email: hf23n@nih.gov Direct inquiries regarding review issues and special instructions for application preparation, address the letter of intent to, and mail two copies of the application and all five sets of appendices to: Dr. Madelon Halula Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 6000-B Rockledge Drive, Room 2150, MSC 7616 Bethesda, MD 20892-7616 Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service) Telephone: (301) 402-2636 FAX: (301) 402-2638 Email: mh30x@nih.gov Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Ms. Victoria Putpush Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 4B29, MSC 7610 Bethesda, MD 20892-7610 Telephone: (301) 402-6245 FAX: (301) 480-3780 Email: vp8g@nih.gov Donna Huggins Grants Management Specialist National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 45 Center Drive, Room 6-AS-49J, MSC 6600 Bethesda, MD 20892-6600 Telephone: (301) 594-8848 FAX: (301) 480-3504 Email: dh8v@nih.gov Linda Hilley Grants Management Branch National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 6000 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7003 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003 Telephone: (301) 443-0915 FAX: (301) 443-3891 Email: lhilley@willco.niaaa.nih.gov Gary Fleming, JD Chief, Grants Management Branch National Institute on Drug Abuse 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 3131, MSC 9541 Bethesda, MD 20892-9541 Telephone: 301-443-6710 FAX: 301-443-6847 Email: gf6s@nih.gov Schedule Letter of Intent Receipt Date: August 1, 1999 Application Receipt Date: November 24, 1999 Scientific Review Date: March 1, 2000 Advisory Council Date: May 1, 2000 Earliest Award Date: August 1, 2000 AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.855 Immunology, Allergic and Immunological Diseases Research and 93.856 Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research. Grants are awarded under the authority of the Public Health Service Act, Section 301 (42 USC 241) and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations, most specifically at 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of the Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. The PHS strongly encourages all grant and contract recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
![]() |
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
![]() |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
![]() |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
![]() |
||||