EXPIRED
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
See Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
The purpose of this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) is to develop multi-organ automated microphysiological systems (MPS) for studying the effects of microgravity conditions on human body in low Earth orbit at the International Space Station National Laboratory (ISS-NL). This program will provide insights on human patho(physiology), especially aging-related functional decline and age-related diseases. The multi-organ MPS configuration will allow better modeling of the whole organism. Improved automation with extended longevity of MPS will facilitate longer experiments in space and the collection of more physiologically relevant data. The inclusion of samples representing the broad spectrum of diversity in the human population will allow for better modeling of aging progression and development of interventions. Funds from the NIH will be made available through the UG3/UH3 cooperative agreement mechanism. During the initial UG3 phase, support will be provided to develop robust complex organ systems, which can manifest the hallmarks of human age-related tissue and organ dysfunction and recapitulate the progression of aging-associated diseases when exposed to prolonged microgravity. The multi-organ integrated systems will be validated and tested on the ground to assess capability of chips to sustain flight-related stresses and to provide evidence of the functional utility of the proposed models for experiments at the ISS-NL. Following administrative review, the UH3 phase will build upon successful UG3-developed models to facilitate the assessment on the ISS-NL of the hallmarks of aging, biomarkers of associated diseases, bioavailability, efficacy, and toxicity of therapeutic agents. It is anticipated that these studies will lead to the identification of novel treatment mechanisms through better understanding of age-related disease biology, pathways and mechanisms underlying age-related tissue and organ functional decline and age-related diseases, drug screening, assessment of candidate therapies for efficacy and safety. This program will establish the pre-clinical foundation to inform clinical studies on Earth.
September 16, 2024
Application Due Dates | Review and Award Cycles | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New | Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) | AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed | Scientific Merit Review | Advisory Council Review | Earliest Start Date |
October 18, 2024 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | March 2025 | May 2025 | July 2025 |
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Not Applicable
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the How to Apply - Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the How to Apply - Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
This Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) invites applications for the NIH/Center for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS) Coordinated Microphysiological Systems Program for Translational Research in Space (Tissue Chips in Space 2.0), for projects designed to develop automated, complex organ Microphysiological Systems (MPS) representing the broad spectrum of population diversity to assess the effects of microgravity on the human body. The overall objective of the program is to better understand the effects of microgravity on human physiology as models of disease, to gain insight into the hallmarks of human age-related tissue and organ functional decline, to uncover the mechanisms underlying age-related disorders, and to provide opportunities for the development of new therapies for age-related dysfunction and associate diseases leveraging MPS operating in microgravity. This NOFO focuses on further development of tissue-on-chip technology applied to research conducted on the International Space Station National Laboratory (ISS-NL) in low Earth orbit to advance the discovery of diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic interventions for diseases of aging, including MPS platforms that leverage recent advances in the longevity extensions of MPS. An essential feature of this NOFO is an expectation for a multidisciplinary approach that brings together experts in bioengineering, computational biology, aging biology, diseases of aging and pathology, pharmacology, drug development and clinical science. This NOFO will ultimately advance biomedical research and clinical technologies for terrestrial and space use that could improve human health on Earth and in space.
Funds from the NIH will be made available through the cooperative agreement award mechanism using the UG3/UH3 activity code. The initial UG3 phase will support studies to develop multi-organ automated MPS and test them on the ground and onboard the ISS-NL. Funds will be utilized to conduct preflight ground development and validation of multi-organ MPS, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) flight certification to support in-orbit experiment operations, and post flight data processing. The UH3 phase will support studies that build upon findings from the UG3 phase. Funds will be utilized to conduct preflight ground optimization and validation, NASA flight certification to support in-orbit experiment operations, and post-flight data processing to facilitate the assessment of biomarkers, bioavailability, efficacy, and toxicity of therapeutic agents. CASIS, Inc., a nonprofit organization that manages the ISS National Laboratory on the International Space Station, will facilitate access to the services of commercial implementation partners with expertise in the execution of microgravity research in space, provide access to NASACargo Resupply Services vehicles for the transportation of experiments to the ISS-NL, support for the execution of experiments on the ISS-NL by crew, and return of the experiments from the ISS-NL to the ground for both the UG3 and UH3 phases.
The International Space Station National Laboratory (ISS-NL) provides an extraordinary research platform for experiments in the biological and medical sciences. Microgravity induces a vast array of changes in organisms ranging from bacteria to humans, including global alterations in gene expression and 3-dimensional aggregation of cells into tissue-like structures. Moreover, studies of astronauts reveal a variety of space flight-induced health conditions, many of which may serve as models of ground-based ailments such as aging, age-related diseases and trauma. Many of these alterations in human physiology resemble those observed during the process of aging, but at accelerated pace in microgravity conditions. Microphysiological Systems (MPS) are bioengineered microfluidic devices seeded with human cells and tissues that recapitulate organ systems and function. MPS have emerged as powerful tools for biomedical research and are gaining essential roles in drug discovery, regulatory approval, safety and efficacy assessment and precision medicine studies. NCATS has consistently shown leadership in the development of tissue chip technology, in the demonstration of its utility in drug development for safety, efficacy and precision medicine, and in the dissemination of the technology (https://ncats.nih.gov/tissuechip/about). NCATS previously funded a Chips-in-Space consortium which further developed MPS systems to be used in low Earth orbit (LEO) biomedical research under microgravity conditions (https://ncats.nih.gov/research/research-activities/tissue-chip/projects/space). Through partnerships between NCATS, NASA and CASIS, the Tissue-Chips-in-Space program has enabled advances in the study of microgravity-associated human physiology. The Tissue-Chips-in-Space program has also promoted key technological improvements in the tissue chips instrumentation systems towards automation and miniaturization required for space flight.
Research into the effects of the space environment on human tissues and organs promises to advance pharmaceutical development and augment Earth-based studies in human biology. The NIH and CASIS have partnered and executed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to collaborate and coordinate efforts that will help refine tissue chip technology for biomedical research use at the ISS-NL. The ability to conduct research in space using tissue chip technology provides unprecedented opportunities to study the effects of microgravity, reduced-gravity environments at the ISS-NL, and radiation exposure and its effects on many of the human body's systems. Several human body systems weaken or deteriorate when subjected to a microgravity environment during spaceflight mimicking earth-bound functional changes – cardiac dysfunction, sarcopenia, bone density loss, decreased visual acuity, fibrosis, wound healing and immuosenescence. These physiological changes closely mirror some age-related disease states, except that microgravity-induced changes often manifest clinically-relevant markers more rapidly in space, resulting in detectable changes that occur over weeks or months compared to years and decades on Earth. In addition, host-microbial interactions can be affected due to the impact of microgravity on the immune system and provide an opportunity to understand shifts of microbial communities (e.g. pathobionts) that promote a dysbiotic state, and the systemic effects of microbially-derived metabolites on host physiology. This accelerated onset and progression provides an opportunity to model diseases in space and to gain insights into the mechanisms controlling age-related dysfunction at a faster pace. Similarly, the identification and testing of therapeutic targets could be accelerated. The development of potential therapeutics targeting aging-related dysfunctions is notoriously difficult. In clinical trials, progression is slow with a typical clinical trial length and optimal timing of intervention not aligning with symptoms, progression is not formally captured in routine care and is difficult to ascertain. Therefore, microgravity conditions could potentially provide unique opportunities for conducting clinical trials for therapeutics targeting aging dysfunction and age-associated diseases. This Tissue-Chips-in-Space 2.0 program will support development of multi-organ integrated tissue chip and organ-on-a-chip platforms to more closely approximate human body-on-chip systems and better model physiological changes associated with aging and related diseases. Multi-organ platform integration will enable the study of multiple organ (patho)physiology including organ-to-organ communication and host-microbiome interactions in diseased and healthy models. The use of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived organ-specific cell types from diverse groups of donors, which may, in the future, include those from NASA and commercial astronauts who will serve as their own avatars, will enable advances in the study of microgravity-associated age-related conditions mimicking accelerated aging pathophysiology that take into account disease heterogeneity and/or population diversity.
To improve MPS platform technology for utilization as model systems to better understand the effects of space on humans during long-duration spaceflights, NASA partnered with the NIH, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to develop extended longevity tissue chips for development and testing on Earth with a focus on the development of systems requiring minimal human intervention. The funded projects seek to adapt existing 3D tissues and MPS to expand tissue viability and robust function for a minimum of 6 months and fully test and validate these models in response to acute and chronic stressors (https://science.nasa.gov/mission/3d-tissue-chips). This program will incorporate automated engineering capabilities for real-time online readouts for longitudinal data capturing. The Tissue Chips in Space 2.0 program may incorporate these and other advancements in tissue chips technology, such as extending MPS culture viability beyond a month in order to extend experimental time to advance our understanding of age-related conditions. The Tissue-Chips-in-Space 2.0. program is intended to benefit from lessons learned during the development of improved automation and miniaturization of these MPS platforms and contribute to the development of integrated automated and miniaturized MPS systems supported by the MATChS program. These technologies, further developed in the Tissue-Chips-in-Space 2.0 program, will provide opportunities to study the effects of long duration space flight on the human body that not only inform us about the effects of space on human health, but also advance our understanding of human (patho)physiology on Earth. It is anticipated that this NIH/CASIS NOFO will delve into the molecular basis of physiological events in a microgravity environment which recapitulate human aging processes at an accelerated rate. This program will provide information on human age-related dysfunction and age-associated diseases and will accelerate the discovery of molecular mechanisms providing information for novel targets for drug development and innovative treatment modalities. Thus, the program will contribute to the development of drugs that can slow the process of aging and will lead to new interventions that can target a range of common human age-related disorders.
Partner Organizations
The highly collaborative nature of these projects will require close interactions with the following Partner Organizations. A collaborative partnership with both CASIS and an Implementation Partner is required. In addition, award recipients will be required to participate in the Tissue Chip Consortium, as described below.
CASIS:
CASIS manages the International Space Station ("ISS") National Laboratory ("NL") in accordance with NASA Cooperative Agreement No. 80JSC018M0005, CFDA 0043-007. In partnership with NASA, CASIS works to enable access to the ISS National Lab for research, technology development, STEM education, and workforce development by U.S. commercial companies, U.S. government agencies, and U.S. educational and nonprofit organizations that require the unique environment of space for projects seeking to improve lives and the health of patients on Earth. As with the prior Tissue-Chips-in-Space program and at no cost to the recipients, CASIS will again allocate in-kind resources that will be utilized to enable the NIH-awarded spaceflight investigations. These in-kind resources will include, but are not limited to, a portion of the total scope spaceflight mission management, the required services for the transportation of flight hardware, experiments, and samples to and from the International Space Station, the in-orbit astronaut crew time required for experiment execution, as well as other resources and coordination activities as are necessary to conduct the awarded microgravity investigations. CASIS will also provide the following to NCATS recipients:
Recipients of an NIH award will be required to enter into a User Agreement with CASIS for the support of the ISS National Lab to sponsor the research investigation on the International Space Station. The ISS-NL User Agreement template is available here ( https://www.issnationallab.org/user-agreements/ ) and includes additional requirements from NASA as well as the terms and conditions that will govern the partnership between NIH grant recipients and CASIS for payload development and the execution of the research investigation on the International Space Station.
Implementation Partners:
Each recipient will be required to select and work with an Implementation Partner. Implementation Partners are experienced commercial companies who design and build spaceflight hardware and provide services to the research community as science payload developers. In partnership with CASIS, their expertise in hardware design and the payload integration process coupled with demonstrated experience in space is intended to ensure scientific success even for recipients who may have no or limited prior spaceflight research. Implementation Partners provide unique suites of flight certified hardware and services including:
Contact information for ISS-NL Implementation Partners and introductory information on their capabilities can be found at https://www.issnationallab.org/implementation-partners/. It is anticipated that the applicants determine the detailed plan for integration of the developed multi-organ MPS system with hardware for space experiments in collaboration with the selected Implementation partner. Such plans should be included in the Research Strategy section of the application and appropriately budgeted in the Budget section of the application.
The Tissue Chip Consortium (The TC Consortium)
The NIH Tissue Chip Programs are led and managed by NCATS and utilize expertise (organ physiology, regulatory science, stem cells, bioengineering, etc.) from NIH experts, as well as experts from the FDA and industry. The TC Consortium, which comprises all these partnerships, holds an in-person meeting every 6 months and plays a pivotal role in advancing MPS technology. Recipients from this NOFO will become members of the TC Consortium and will be expected to attend these semi-annual meetings.
This initiative supports translational research using tissue chips to investigate the effects of microgravity and the spaceflight environment on the human body. The findings will provide mechanistic insights into how the microgravity environment models aging and diseases associated with aging, particularly, but not exclusively, in integumentary, skeletal, muscular, nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, immune, respiratory, digestive, urinary, and reproductive systems. Research designed to improve the translation of existing knowledge into strategies for the prevention and treatment of such diseases or conditions in humans will be responsive to this NOFO. Development of integrated complex organ system by using iPSC-derived organ-specific cell types from diverse groups of people is expected in this NOFO. A complex organ system may be a multi-organ or single organ MPS well mimicking organismal function, for example by introducing hormones or lymphokines/chemokines. Multi-organ Integrated MPS system may be a system comprised of more than one tissue/organ affected in healthy aging and age-related diseases. Multi-organ system can be comprised of individual organ/tissue integrated in one MPS, or co-culture of different organ/tissues including vascularization, innervation, incorporation of immune cells. This complex organ system should allow for modeling of aging and age-related conditions with higher precision. Multi-organ signals are regulated during aging and aging-related changes in interorgan communication may play a significant role in aging pathology. In this multi-organ system, it is also of interest to assess any changes in the physical and functional characteristic of exosomes or extracellular vesicles as important mediators of intercellular signaling and communication under microgravity. Understanding the mechanisms that coordinate organ interactions may lead to new insights into multi-morbidities. Incorporation of population diversity in the MPS will allow for better understanding of the complexity and heterogeneity of aging and associated pathologies and will lead to better characterization of the hallmarks of aging, such as epigenetic alterations, changes in telomere length, shift in multi-omic (transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic) profiles, post-translational modifications and dysbiosis. Cellular senescence may be triggering aging and could be considered as a therapeutic target for treating aging-related pathologies and chronic diseases, e.g., cancer, neurodegeneration, heart disease and osteoarthritis. The outcomes of this program will contribute to the development of senescence biomarkers and identification of therapeutic targets.
The identification of targetable molecular pathways will contribute to facilitating translation into strategies for the prevention and treatment of aging-related conditions and diseases. It is anticipated that the funded projects will develop integrated automated and miniaturized MPS capable of functioning autonomously for extensive periods of time. These systems should be equipped with capabilities to maintain culture without external intervention and to be monitored remotely through real-time biosensing and readout capabilities, including telemetry operations. MPS will be subject to post flight recovery for tissue (e.g., histological) and multiomic (e.g., genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, epigenomic) analyses to elucidate the pathways affected by microgravity, to identify hallmarks of aging accelerated by the permanence in space, and to assess biomarkers of aging-related conditions. The newly acquired knowledge will enable novel pharmaceutical design/targets based on a better mechanistic insight of the biology.
Each UG3/UH3 application should be structured to meet the NIH/CASIS program goals. It is anticipated that the UG3 phase will involve on-ground development of multi-organ automated tissue chip technology to be used in microgravity environments. That includes, but it is not limited to, working with the ISS-NL and ISS-NL Implementation Partners to design, develop, and execute ground testing of flight hardware in pilot experiments to validate that all of the science objectives defined for the proposed experiment can be completed prior to flight integration for launch to the International Space Station and execution on orbit. Successful UG3 projects may transition into the UH3 phase for re-flight and more extensive experiments and analyses, with no more than 5 years of support for UG3/UH3 phases. The models are expected to recapitulate critical aspects of human physiology and to provide a measurable output for the representative systems. It is expected that iPSC from diverse groups of donors will be used in developing multi-organ tissue chips that will allow more accurately represent human physiology and pathology. Factors contributing to diversity that can influence the risk and likelihood of developing a disease, experiencing a long-term health outcome, and responding to treatment include (but are not limited to):
Essential characteristics of the models should include all or some of the following features: 1) multi-cellular architecture that represents characteristics of the healthy tissues or organs and their pathology; 2) functional representation of normal and diseased human biology; 3) reproducible and viable operation under physiological conditions maintained for extended periods of time; and 4) representation of diversity and heterogeneity of human population. The platform used should be compatible for operation at the ISS-NL using ground-based controls, transmit to ground control assay outputs that include telemetry operation for different types of read-outs depending on particular multi-organ system architecture. The platform should also provide spatial and temporal control of the cellular microenvironment, while enabling continuous monitoring (sensing), probing (direct in-cell measurements), and sampling (testing and continuous data collection and analysis) of the system. Particularly, the monitoring of fluidic control, oxygen and pH in-line sensors is expected.
At least one flight opportunity is expected for each of the UG3 and UH3 phases, and therefore a flight experiment should be proposed for each of the UG3 and UH3 phases. Selected projects should be flight ready within 18 months of the specific award period, but it will not be possible to secure flight allocation resources on the International Space Station for all flight-ready projects in this time interval if multiple investigations mature at the same time. If flight schedules change, investigators may modify proposed timelines, subject to review and approval by the NIH Program Officer in coordination with ISS-NL.
This application will be administered as a bi-phasic award. The entire project period (combined UG3 and UH3) should not exceed five years. Applicants may propose a project period of up to two to three years for each phase depending on project needs. Please note below the major goals that are anticipated to be accomplished under each phase of award.
Major Goals of the UG3 phase:
(1) develop complex-organ MPS system using iPSC-derived or primary patient cell sources on tissues/organ-on-chips platforms with platform integration to study organ pathology and organ-to-organ communication. Strong justification and rational for cell source used should be provided. Models should demonstrate a functional representation of normal and diseased human states representing population diversity. These MPS systems should be developed to be functional in automatic regime for prolonged periods of time and be capable of telemetry for continuous monitoring of the system. These miniaturized systems should be capable of integrating with the flight-certified hardware for payload and functioning in an automatic regime. (2) determine the relevance of models via preliminary testing of key experimental features and outcomes on the ground and during the initial flight to the ISS-NL. The successful outcome will determine which UG3 projects will proceed to the UH3 phase of the study. This would include, for example, inclusion of non-invasive endpoints that generate reproducible data under physiological conditions over a prolonged culture conditions at the ISS-NL. The functional validation of the tissue chips may be model-specific.
Major Goals of the UH3 phase:
(1) to demonstrate the functional utility of the models for understanding the effects of microgravity on human physiology, (2) to correlate these effects with hallmarks of aging and markers of age-associated conditions, (3) to identify novel targets for drug screening, (4) to assess candidate therapies for efficacy and safety. These goals will lead to the establishment of pre-clinical foundations that will inform clinical trial design. To achieve this, the applications should focus on outcomes that may include:
Transition from the UG3 to the UH3 Award
Transition to the UH3 award will depend on the successful achievement of general and model-specific benchmarks, the feasibility of study continuation, a proven ability to work within a consortium arrangement with other recipients and ISS-NL Implementation Partners, and the availability of funds. Not all award recipients may transition from the UG3 to the UH3 phase of award. The UH3 award consideration will be determined through an administrative review of progress in the UG3 phase focused on UG3 recipients who successfully met their milestones, demonstrated functionality and validity of their model systems, and have well-conceived plans to fully utilize the models for more extensive testing on the ISS-NL during the UH3 phase. The Administrative review determining conversion to the UH3 phase will be conducted by a panel derived from the Tissue Chip Project team, composed of NIH extramural program staff from the participating NIH Institutes. Successful completion of the UG3 milestones will be the basis for determination on whether the application should progress to the UH3 phase. ISS-NL will provide input to NIH extramural program staff on the feasibility of the projects for the next phase.
Recipients will submit a progress report to both the Grants Management Specialist and the NIH Program Official upon completion of the UG3 milestones. The progress report may also include updates and revisions to the originally proposed UH3 aims based on the results of the UG3 phase. Prior to initiation of the UH3 stage, an updated human subjects protection plan (e.g., protocol amendment, IRB approval of amendments to the protocol or consent form, etc.) and a detailed data and safety monitoring plan (DSMP), if appropriate, must be approved by NIH.
Milestones and Timeline:
A timeline (Gantt chart) to include milestones is required for all studies. Milestones are benchmarks that create go/no-go decision points in the project and must include clear and quantitative criteria for success. Yearly quantitative milestones are required to provide clear indicators of a project's continued success or emergent difficulties. Milestones will be used to evaluate the application, not only in peer review, but also in consideration of the awarded project for funding of non-competing award years. This NOFO is designed as a two-stage cooperative agreement. Applications must include the anticipated milestones for both the UG3 and the UH3 phase. The UG3 must include milestones to determine the success of the project at the end of the UG3 phase. Support for the UH3 is contingent upon progress made during the UG3 phase, meeting the milestones, programmatic priorities, the original UG3/UH3 peer review recommendations, and the availability of funds. Some projects may not transition from the UG3 to the UH3 phase.
Prior to funding an application, the Program Official will contact the applicant to discuss the proposed UG3 and UH3 milestones and any changes suggested by NIH staff or the NIH review panel. The Program Official and applicant will negotiate and agree upon a final set of approved milestones which will be specified in the Notice of Award. Selected projects must be flight-ready within 18 months of the UG3 award start date.
Technical Feasibility
In order to utilize the ISS National Lab, NASA has specified details regarding payload integration requirements available at https://www.nasa.gov/missions/station/quick-start-guide-to-payload-design/. The ISS-NL requires that recipients identify an Implementation Partner that has experience developing NASA flight certified payloads and to develop with the Implementation Partner an experimental concept with defined science requirements in the flight hardware and/or facility supported by the Implementation Partner. A list of Implementation Partners is available at https://www.issnationallab.org/implementation-partners/ and general questions regarding the capabilities of flight hardware and facilities on the International Space Station may be sent to a CASIS representative at [email protected]. Please contact CASIS and NIH program staff with any questions or concerns.
Investigators must contact a CASIS representative, at [email protected], as early as possible to receive guidance on the technical feasibility component of their applications prior to submission to the NIH. This interaction with CASIS is crucial for providing guidance on which ISS-NL Implementation Partner would be most appropriate for partnering with the applicant. Implementation Partners are experienced payload developers and subject matter experts who can provide a wide range of products and services to aid in the payload integration process and have demonstrated experience to ensure scientific success. It is expected that the effort of the Implementation Partner will be budgeted as a subcontract.
Recipients may be required to travel to support critical project activities related to experiment design/development, payload development, experiment and payload verification testing, design reviews, ISS crew training, and/or other required ISS payload integration process requirements.
National Institute on Aging ( NIA )
The National Institute on Aging (NIA) is interested in using the unique ISS-NL environment to study aging and age-related processes in humans with a focus on understanding molecular, cellular, and physiological mechanisms.
While applications are primarily centered around MPS technology development for experimentation in space to improve human health, one or more of the aims should address specific questions about the biology of aging in low gravity and on earth. NIA is interested in approaches that promote understanding of aging cells and tissues.
Examples of meritorious projects that NIA may consider include but are not limited to: 1) comparisons between the mechanisms of aging-like phenotypes in space to aging phenotypes observed on the ground and 2) investigations of the influence of space flight on the hallmarks of aging.
Applications that do not contain all of the required elements of the Research Strategy and attachments in the R&R Other Project Information Form, Other Attachments section will be deemed incomplete and will not be reviewed.
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Cooperative Agreement: A financial assistance mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this NOFO.
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply - Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Not Allowed: Only accepting applications that do not propose clinical trials.
The following NIH components intend to commit the following amounts in FY2025:
NCATS intends to commit $5M in FY2025 to fund 4-5 awards.
NIA intends to commit $ 600,000 in FY2025 to co-fund 1 award
Application budgets are limited to $750,000 direct costs per year.
The scope of the proposed project should determine the project period. The project period may be 2- 3 years for the UG3 phase. The project period may be up to 2 - 3 years for the UH3 phase. The maximum project period for the entire UG3/UH3 award is 5 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Higher Education Institutions
The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
For-Profit Organizations
Local Governments
Federal Governments
Other
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are not allowed.
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from diverse backgrounds, including underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, individuals with disabilities, and women are always encouraged to apply for NIH support. See, Reminder: Notice of NIH's Encouragement of Applications Supporting Individuals from Underrepresented Ethnic and Racial Groups as well as Individuals with Disabilities, NOT-OD-22-019.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply - Application Guide.
This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
Number of Applications
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the How to Apply - Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
By the date listed in Part 1. Overview Information, prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
The letter of intent should be sent to:
NCATS Letters of Intent
Telephone: 301-827-9549
Email: [email protected]
All page limitations described in the How to Apply – Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply – Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Other Attachments:
Milestone Plan (required): The filename "Milestone Plan.pdf" should be used.
The Milestone Plan attachment is limited to 2-page maximum. Applications lacking a Milestone Plan attachment will be considered incomplete and will not be reviewed.
The applicant is required to provide detailed information and timelines for completing all proposed activities according to the Specific Aims. A separate timeline and milestones must be included for each phase (UG3 and UH3), and Milestones should refer to Specific Aims and include the following:
Milestones that reflect progress in each specific aim should be easily measurable and realistic. Include specific criteria against which project progress will be assessed.
Go/No-Go Transition Milestone for transition from the UG3 Phase to the UH3 Phase
Provide a graphical display summarizing the timeline of the milestones plan in the form of a Gantt Chart.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Within the biosketches, examples must be included of the PD(s)'/PI(s) experience in directing research activities related to Microphysiological systems.
Within the biosketches, include information about the personnel's expertise of the scientific fields relevant to this NOFO, i.e., expertise in bioengineering, computational biology, aging biology, diseases of aging and pathology, pharmacology, drug development and clinical science.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
A Senior/Key personnel representative from a team is required to attend a semi-annual NIH TC Consortium Meetings in the Washington, D.C. area. Funds to support travel of this representative to attend the Consortium Meetings should be included in the budget.
Applicants should also request funds for travel expenses related to critical project activities related to experiment design/development, payload development, experiment and payload verification testing, design reviews, ISS crew training, and/or other required ISS payload integration process requirements after interaction with Implementation Partner to define the anticipated frequency, location, and approximate budget of travel.
Applicants must include the proposed budget for both the UG3 and UH3 phases of the award.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Funds required for ISS payload optimization by Implementation Partner and MPS ISS payload integration should be included in the budget as a subcontract to Implementation Partner.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Specific Aims: Provide the overall goals or hypotheses for the entire project period and indicate separate Specific Aims to be accomplished in the UG3 phase and in the UH3 phase.
Research Strategy: Applicants should provide a rationale for the choice organs and human body systems modeled in multi-organ MPS system and the rationale for how experiments in space will advance the study of human (patho)physiology, in particular the process of aging and associated diseases. A detailed description of plans to develop a bioengineered platform using advances in Microphysiological systems engineering, biosensing and other cutting-edge technologies is expected. These plans should include characterization of these systems duration or length of culture, discussion of candidate therapies including timing of administration, appropriate assays, biomarkers and physiological readouts, and statistical analyses, including experimental replicates and ground controls. It is required that the plans will include the use of iPSC-derived organ-specific cell types from diverse groups of people, to enable advances in the study of microgravity-associated age-related conditions mimicking accelerated aging pathophysiology considering disease heterogeneity and/or population diversity. Applicants are required to include an identified implementation partner from the list of CASIS Implementation Partners, which can be found at https://www.issnationallab.org/implementation-partners/, and should include a description of the proposed interactions with CASIS Implementation Partners to satisfy NASA payload integration requirements, as well as the approaches to characterize the models and identify novel biology/mechanisms that could aid in novel targets for treatment.
Technical Feasibility (required)
Applications must clearly describe how the NASA payload integration requirements will be met. Specifically, the technical feasibility details should include logistics, hardware, projected time frame, hazards, and research questions. Applications may be considered technically incomplete for flight research if a detailed description of proposed flight hardware with spatial and temporal control of the cellular microenvironment is not included, and the NASA payload integration requirements are not addressed. Such applications deemed incomplete will not be reviewed.
Specifically, the technical feasibility details should include the following elements:
Applications must contain the following elements/items to be considered complete. All applications that do not contain these elements will be considered incomplete and will not be reviewed:
Letters of Support: A Letter of Support from the Implementation Partner is required.
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply - Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered Yes to the question Are Human Subjects Involved? on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Delayed Onset Study
Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIHs electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organizations profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by NCATS, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
In order to expedite review, applicants are requested to notify the NCATS Referral Office by email at [email protected] when the application has been submitted. Please include the FON number and title, PD/PI name, and title of the application.
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at [email protected].
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Any instructions provided here are in addition to the instructions in the policy.
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? Is the prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project rigorous? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?
Specific to this NOFO: How strong and appropriate is the rationale for potential translational benefit derived from the use of the proposed models? How strong is the justification for the disease, condition or intervention of focus? To what extent will the proposed model recapitulate the process of aging and/or progression of aging-related associated diseases? To what degree will the created models be able to advance understanding of effects of microgravity on the human body? To what extent will the proposed models advance the knowledge on particular genomic, proteomic, metabolomic and other biological hallmarks of aging and markers of associated diseases? To what extent will research findings with the proposed Microphysiological systems model and translate to understanding (patho) physiology in humans?
To what extent will successful completion of the research aims improve the understanding of disease pathogenesis and advance the development of diagnostics and interventions?Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or those in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance, and organizational structure appropriate for the project?
Specific to this NOFO: To what extent does the application provide a feasible strategy for collaboration among the scientific fields relevant to this NOFO, i.e., expertise in bioengineering, computational biology, aging biology, diseases of aging and pathology, pharmacology, drug development and clinical science, including with the Implementation Partner? How adequate is the expertise of the key personnel in the areas of project leadership and directing research activities related to Microphysiological systems?
Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?
Specific to this NOFO: To what extent does the project utilize the current advances in Microphysiological systems engineering, biosensing and other cutting-edge technologies? How suitable are the tissue chip platform and cells being proposed to capture the features for the disease? To what extent are novel approaches being developed, or novel outcomes likely, through the planned MPS development and subsequent integration into payloads?
Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Have the investigators included plans to address weaknesses in the rigor of prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project? Have the investigators presented strategies to ensure a robust and unbiased approach, as appropriate for the work proposed? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed? Have the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex, for studies in vertebrate animals or human subjects?
If the project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, are the plans to address 1) the protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion or exclusion of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults), justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?
Specific to this NOFO: To what extent are the proposed MPS technologies state-of-the-art and scientifically justified for experiments at the ISS-NL? How suitable is the proposed tissue chip platform for capturing the features for the disease representing diverse populations? To what extent are the conceptual frameworks, testable hypotheses, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well integrated, well-reasoned and appropriate to the disease to be modeled? How well justified is the choice of the bioengineered platform, microfluidics, and biomechanics and cell sources or the model system? To what extent will the description proposed flight hardware enable spatial and temporal control of the cellular microenvironment? How well do the technical feasibility details address payload integration requirements? How feasible is the strategy provided for collaboration and partnership among the scientific fields relevant to this NOFO? To what extent are the overall goals of the application conducive to generating novel models for studies of human aging and associated pathology? How well-reasoned and appropriate are the overall strategies, methodologies and analyses for conducting a translatable aging hallmark and biomarker study?
Milestones: How appropriate and clearly defined are the milestones provided for the UG3 and UH3 phases? To what degree are the UG3 and UH3 milestones feasible, developed and quantifiable with regard to the specific aims of each phase? How appropriate are the timeline and critical decision points (i.e., go/no go decision points) for the UG3 and UH3 phases? How adequate are the criteria provided to assess UG3 milestone completion in order to make a decision to advance studies to the UH3 phase during UG3/UH3 transition?
Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment, and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?
Specific to this NOFO: How well does the project justify the necessity to utilize the unique environment present on the ISS-NL? How well-documented are the proposed collaborations, including provision of Letters of Support? To what extent will all members of the proposed consortium, including Implementation Partners, provide an adequate environment for the proposed project?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Not Applicable
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults) to determine if it is justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following three points: (1) a complete description of all proposed procedures including the species, strains, ages, sex, and total numbers of animals to be used; (2) justifications that the species is appropriate for the proposed research and why the research goals cannot be accomplished using an alternative non-animal model; and (3) interventions including analgesia, anesthesia, sedation, palliative care, and humane endpoints that will be used to limit any unavoidable discomfort, distress, pain and injury in the conduct of scientifically valuable research. Methods of euthanasia and justification for selected methods, if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, is also required but is found in a separate section of the application. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals Section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Not Applicable
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Reviewers will comment on whether the Resource Sharing Plan(s) (e.g., Sharing Model Organisms) or the rationale for not sharing the resources, is reasonable.
For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, reviewers will comment on the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, in accordance with NIH peer review policies and practices, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
Applications may undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Appeals of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this NOFO.
Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Advisory Council. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.
Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicants federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicants integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants. This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipients business official.
In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.
Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk. For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:
All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.
Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable federal regulations. NIH may terminate awards under certain circumstances. See 2 CFR Part 200.340 Termination and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.5.2 Remedies for Noncompliance or Enforcement Actions: Suspension, Termination, and Withholding of Support.
The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) administrative guidelines, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grant administration regulations at 2 CFR Part 200, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the recipients is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the recipients for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the recipients and NIH as defined below.
The PD(s)/PI(s) will have the primary responsibility for:
Publications
The PD(s)/PI(s) will be responsible for the timely submission of all abstracts, manuscripts and reviews (co)authored by project investigators and supported in whole or in part under this Cooperative Agreement. The PD(s)/PI(s) and Project Leaders are requested to submit manuscripts to the NIH Program Officer and Project Scientist(s) within two weeks of acceptance for publication so that an up-to-date summary of program accomplishments can be maintained. Publications and oral presentations of work conducted under this Cooperative Agreement are the responsibility of the PD(s)/PI(s) and appropriate Project Leaders and will require appropriate acknowledgement of NIH support. Timely publication of major findings is encouraged.
Communication Plans
The PD(s)/PI(s) will be responsible for:
NIH staff have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below:
NCATS will designate program staff, including a Program Officer to provide stewardship and administrative oversight of the cooperative agreement. The Program Officer will be responsible for the normal scientific and programmatic stewardship of the award and will be named in the Notice of Award. The Program Officer will make the final determination on the negotiated milestones and will also make the final determination on whether the milestones are met.
NIH Project Scientist(s)
Project Scientists are members of the trans-NIH Microphysiological Systems Working Group that will have substantial scientific/programmatic involvement in the technical assistance, advice and coordination of this team; Project Scientist(s) will facilitate and not direct the activities of the team.
Specifically, Project Scientist(s) will be substantially involved in this project as follows:
The NIH will enlist additional scientific experts as necessary from within the NIH, other government agencies, whose function will be to advise the PD(s)/PI(s) in carrying out the goals and aims of the approved studies.
The NIH reserves the right to curtail or phase out the award in the event of (1) a substantial shortfall in accomplishing the management goals and responsibilities as stated in the reviewed application, (2) failure to meet procedures and milestones, and/or (3) substantive changes in the management of award(s) that are not in keeping with the objectives of the NOFO.
Areas of Joint Responsibility include:
Dispute Resolution:
Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between recipients and NIH may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual recipient. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the recipient's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulation 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulation 45 CFR Part 16.
Consistent with the 2023 NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing, when data management and sharing is applicable to the award, recipients will be required to adhere to the Data Management and Sharing requirements as outlined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Upon the approval of a Data Management and Sharing Plan, it is required for recipients to implement the plan as described.
When multiple years are involved, recipients will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.4.1 Reporting. To learn more about post-award monitoring and reporting, see the NIH Grants & Funding website, see Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting.
A final RPPR, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.6 Closeout. NIH NOFOs outline intended research goals and objectives. Post award, NIH will review and measure performance based on the details and outcomes that are shared within the RPPR, as described at 2 CFR Part 200.301.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk (Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues)
Finding Help Online: https://www.era.nih.gov/need-help (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
General Grants Information (Questions regarding application instructions, application processes, and NIH grant resources)
Email: [email protected] (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-480-7075
Grants.gov Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and Workspace)
Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726
Email: [email protected]
Dmitriy Krepkiy, Ph.D.
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Office of Special Initiatives
Phone: 301-451-2232
Email: [email protected]
Tiziana Cogliati, Ph.D.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Division of Aging Biology
Telephone: 240-397-4596
Email: [email protected]
Marilyn Moore-Hoon, Ph.D.
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Telephone: 301-827-9549
Email:[email protected]
Tiangay Waines
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Phone: 301-496-1132
Email: [email protected]
Jeni Smits
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Telephone: 301-827-4020
Email: [email protected]
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.