Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS)
and Human Services (HHS)
EXPIRED
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
New
None
RFA-TR-21-002 - Virtual Approaches Towards New Chemistries for Un-drugged Targets through A Specialized Platform for Innovative Research Exploration (ASPIRE) Collaborative Research Program (U18 Clinical Trials Not Allowed)
Only one application per institution is allowed, as defined in Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
93.350
The purpose of the ASPIRE Collaborative Research Program is to facilitate translational and clinical research between NCATS intramural scientists and the extramural community to develop approaches that will enhance the ability to discover and develop new chemistries towards previously undrugged biological targets (i.e., biological targets with no known drugs to modulate their function) across many human diseases and conditions. NCATS intramural scientists have established an integrated NCATS ASPIRE platform consisting of physical and virtual modules for automated synthetic chemistry, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), engineering, informatics, and biological testing. The FOA will support intramural - extramural collaborations to develop additional physical modules that will enhance the platform’s capabilities. The anticipated outcome includes identification, design, synthesis, and validation of new chemical entities as starting points for drug development of novel targets, and the expansion of chemical space available for drug screening.
June 8, 2021
July 8, 2021. No late applications will be accepted for this Funding Opportunity Announcement.
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization. All types of non-AIDS applications allowed for this funding opportunity announcement are due on the listed date(s).
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Not Applicable
October 2021
January 2022
April 2022
Not Applicable
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Purpose
This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) aims to promote partnerships between NCATS intramural investigators (e.g., those conducting research within the labs and clinics of NCATS) and extramural investigators (e.g., those conducting research in labs and clinics outside of the NIH). Specifically, The FOA will provide support for extramural investigators to take advantage of the unique research opportunities available at the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory within the NCATS Division of Pre-clinical Innovation (DPI), and develop innovative ASPIRE modules that will facilitate identification of novel chemical entities targeted towards currently undrugged biological space. Funds from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) will be made available through the bi-phasic UG3/UH3 cooperative agreement award mechanism. While its companion FOA, RFA-TR-21-002, focuses on development of virtual, cloud-based modules, this FOA focuses on physical modules that will enhance the existing capabilities of NCATS ASPIRE infrastructure, initially established at NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory. Details about the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory and current platform’s capabilities are provided at the laboratory’s site (ncats.nih.gov/aspire/about/intramural-laboratory). Physical modules developed through this extramural-intramural collaboration will be incorporated into the NCATS ASPIRE platform to enhance the process of drug discovery and development and bring novel, safe and effective treatments to more patients more quickly, and at lower cost.
Background
The NCATS ASPIRE Program has the central goal of expanding the set of small-molecule chemical structures needed to modulate biological targets. Currently, progress on the vast number of possible chemical structures in drug-like chemical space (~1060), and the smaller but still substantial number of biological targets in human and pathogen biological space (~106), has been slow and incremental. Using today’s approaches to chemical synthesis, only ~3% of biological space is drugged and a further ~7% is tractable via small-molecule probes. In addition, the percentage of drug-like chemical space that has been synthesized is relatively small compared to the untapped potential. NCATS ASPIRE is a catalytic and transformative drug design and development program that aims to advance our ability to match undrugged biological targets to the corresponding drug-like chemical space and increase our arsenal of novel tools and technologies to fight human diseases.
As artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) become increasingly important to the biomedical research community, NCATS ASPIRE leverages these advances in automated synthetic chemistry and high-throughput biology. The exploration of biologically active chemical space will be accelerated, thereby enabling new avenues for translation and drug development. AI/ML will be used in searching the chemical space for compounds to bind to a biological target; searching both known and novel synthetic routes for producing the compounds; and using the biological assay results as training sets for further optimization of compound structure and function. AI/ML coupled to big data and cheminformatics, will have tremendous potential to improve design of novel therapeutics and to provide safe and effective drugs to patients.
The long-term goal of the NCATS ASPIRE initiative is to expand the chemical space from which new and improved therapeutics can be drawn upon through the identification, synthesis, and validation of new chemical entities. The short-term goal is to sustain an innovative and collaborative eco-system where the intramural NCATS ASPIRE platform provides access to capabilities that are not readily available in extramural laboratories, while the extramural investigators provide complementary, as well as disease and disease-relevant assay expertise to jointly develop cutting-edge techniques for potential integration.
Leveraging Existing Research Resources
This initiative will leverage the ASPIRE infrastructure built at the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory (ncats.nih.gov/aspire/about/intramural-laboratory) with the support of the NIH Helping to End Addiction Long-term Initiative (NIH HEAL Initiative). Applicants are required to utilize the expertise and infrastructure available at the NCATS. In addition, utilizing the resources and support from patient advocacy groups, private research foundations, academic institutions, for profit organizations and other government agencies and the NIH Intramural Program is also encouraged.
Pre-Application Consultation
Applicants must consult with NCATS Extramural Program Staff early in the planning of an application. This early contact will provide an opportunity to discuss and clarify NIH policies and guidelines, including the scope of the project and intent of this FOA.
Prospective applicants are required to discuss their proposed projects with the DPI Director of Compound Management and Automation and include in their application a letter of collaborationfrom the Scientific Director of NCATS/DPI that documents agreement to participate in the proposed collaboration. See Letters of Support and the Intramural Program contacts below.
See also Applicant Webinar information under Section IV.7 below ("Other Submission Requirements and Information").
NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory Capabilities
This FOA requires partnerships with intramural investigators at the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory (ncats.nih.gov/aspire/about/intramural-laboratory). The NCATS ASPIRE platform uses a modular approach including but not limited to reagent preparation and dispensing, reaction execution and workup, purification, and characterization of new drug candidates in a high-throughput manner and with AI/ML capabilities. The overall intent is to keep the capabilities of the platform as diverse and cutting edge as possible by partnering with extramural collaborators who are engaged in next generation research and who can bring the research for further development, validation and deployment on the platform. The role of the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory will be to optimize these technologies such that they can be scaled-up to industrial scale to meet the vision of developing, operating and maintaining a next generation translational discovery platform accessible to a wide community of scientists.
Research Objectives and Scope
For this FOA, the focus is to expand the chemical space from which new and improved therapeutics can be drawn upon through the identification, synthesis, and validation of new chemical entities. Extramural investigators will collaborate with the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory (ncats.nih.gov/aspire/about/intramural-laboratory) to develop a physical module that will be integrated with the overall NCATS ASPIRE platform to help address a translational problem proposed by the extramural laboratory. The module will be initially designed and developed in the extramural PI/PDs laboratory based on the technical and functional specifications provided by the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory. The module will then be transferred to NCATS on an agreed upon timeline, validated at the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory and coupled to NCATS ASPIRE platform’s chemical synthesis and biological screening capabilities. The goal is to enhance the overall capabilities of the NCATS ASPIRE platform and, ultimately, open the platform to non-chemists who can formulate a molecular hypothesis and utilize the platform to translate their ideas into testable compounds.
Active engagement with open communication channels is expected between the extramural researchers and NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory. To promote collaborative efforts from the outset, the partnering intramural and extramural investigators must work jointly in developing the application for this FOA. Extramural collaborators will provide expertise relevant to the development of a physical module of interest. Where applicable, this must include disease and disease-relevant biological assay development expertise. The applicants must have infrastructure and experiences that will allow them to immediately begin designing and building a proposed module. This includes adequate facilities that allow for development of complex mechanical, electrical and chemical interfaces, as well as access to software, mechanical electrical, chemical and automation engineering resources, strong familiarity with complex laboratory instrumentation, and experience with distributed software development projects using shared cloud shared repositories and cloud resources. The role of NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory will be to provide additional expertise relevant to development of the module and how it will be integrated with the overall platform to address a scientific question posed by the investigator. Depending upon the type of a physical module selected, the involvement of NCATS may vary, ranging from cloud computing, expertise in a biological target of interest, small molecule or biological synthesis, automation, informatics analysis, or other related computational, chemistry and biology disciplines.
The collaborations in this FOA will sustain an innovative and collaborative ecosystem where the intramural ASPIRE platform provides access to capabilities that may be beyond the capabilities of extramural investigators. In turn, the extramural investigators will provide access to, for example, disease expertise and the latest cutting-edge techniques for potential integration. Specifically, this FOA is seeking collaborators with:
Prior to submitting an application, applicants are expected to have already completed the following activities relevant to the project:
Phased Innovation Awards
This FOA will use the UG3/UH3 bi-phasic, innovation award mechanism of funding. During the UG3 phase, support will be provided for development of a scientific module that is compatible with the capabilities and goals of the NCATS ASPIRE platform.
The UG3 phase:
The UG3 module development phase must include quantifiable milestones (see below) within a proposed project period not exceeding two years. A UG3 project that successfully meets the milestones will be administratively considered by NIH for transition to the UH3 phase.
The module must augment the overall capabilities of the NCATS ASPIRE platform and be able to work in both a standalone and fully integrated fashion. Example of module types include, but are not limited to:
The module will be required to meet the standards as set by a functional specification with regards to physical dimensions, electrical and network connections, communication protocols, and pneumatic and other gas connections as required. The specifications can be found at NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory’s site (ncats.nih.gov/aspire/about/intramural-laboratory) and will be provided to applicants during the initial discussions with the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory staff. Applicants must adhere to these specifications to design, build, operate, test, and validate the functions of the module during this phase.
UG3 projects that have met the scientific milestones and technical requirements (see below) will be eligible for transition to the UH3 Phase after NIH administrative review (two projects maximum for UH3 phase).
The UH3 phase:
The UH3 Phase involves activities in both intramural and extramural laboratories. NCATS intramural scientists will work towards the initial validation of a module and its eventual full integration in the NCATS ASPIRE platform. Extramural investigator(s) will work towards validation of any active compounds from the screens in additional in vitro and in vivo assays. The proposed project period for the UH3 phase must not exceed 4 years. The first 6 months of the UH3 phase are expected to focus on transfer of the modules and associated protocol to NCATS for validation and incorporation in the platform.
Activities supported during the UH3 Phase may include, but are not limited to:
UG3/UH3 Milestones
All projects must be milestone-driven with clear go/no-go criteria that are quantifiable. Prior to funding an application, the Program Official will contact the applicant to discuss the proposed UG3 and UH3 milestones and any changes suggested by NIH staff or the NIH review panel. The Program Official and the applicant will negotiate and agree on a final set of approved UG3 milestones that will be specified in the Notice of Award. These milestones will be the basis for judging the successful completion of the work proposed in the UG3 stage and progress towards interim milestones in the UH3 stage. Only projects that meet their UG3 milestones will have an opportunity to move to the UH3 phase. UH3 milestones will be the basis for judging progress towards and completion of the UH3 phase.
Additional Considerations
NCATS Computing resources:
The NCATS Information Resources Technology Branch (ITRB) will provide awardees access to various public cloud services, and high-performance computing services for the needs of the awardees. This enables the awardees to offer their systems, projects, and research in a secure environment with simplified implementation, deployment, and operational reliability. Through these services, NCATS ITRB will enable the awardees to gain a self-service capability. NCATS ITRB will provide the following:
IaaS Services
NCATS ITRB will provide the awardee with a cloud instance on any of the following public cloud service providers: Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure or Google Cloud Platform. This instance would be co-managed by the awardee and NCATS ITRB. Access to the awardees cloud instance would be managed using NCATS' Federated Authorization System and the awardees would have complete rights to all services provided by the Cloud Service Provider.
Federated Authorization Services SaaS
If requested, at no cost to the awardee, NCATS ITRB would provide access to NCATS' Federated Authorization Service. The awardee could use NCATS' Authorization Service to provide for federated access to any of their systems and applications.
Cloud Engineering Support
If requested, NCATS IRTB will provide access to and administrative support for various common cloud services including configuration, patching, backups, and user account management. These services include, but are not limited to: Automated Configuration Management Services; Continuous Integration Services; Automated Deployment Services; Code Analysis Services; Log Aggregation and Analysis; Usage and Performance Monitoring Services; Aggregated Search Services; Cache management services; and Message Queue and Notification services.
Cloud based High Performance Computing (HPC)
If requested, NCATS ITRB can also provide a cloud based elastic HPC service designed to automate and scale, giving the scientists the ability to model and deploy their HPC applications in a cloud that can provide the scale and performance needed. The cloud HPC provides resources without undue access restrictions, while addressing the security concerns surrounding cloud deployments. The cloud HPC solution addresses use cases that deal with various storage, hypervisor, and network services. The cloud HPC offers higher utilization and operational savings while providing a high speed, secure and federated access.
Subject Matter Experts:
Extramural investigator(s) are advised to recruit all the expertise that is needed for the development of the specific module of interest and leverage it with the existing NCATS expertise.
Visiting investigator(s) at NCATS:
Extramural teams must identify a visiting investigator who will spend time at NCATS during the module transfer period. The role of the visiting investigator(s) at NCATS will be to ensure that the integration of the extramurally developed module goes smoothly. This will involve delivery, reconstruction, and validation of the individual module, including training for NCATS staff on the operation of the module and its components. Once that is complete, the next step will be to validate the integration of the module with the overall NCATS ASPIRE platform to ensure functionality. Once the module is fully installed and integrated, the role of the visiting investigator(s) will transition to utilizing the entire NCATS ASPIRE platform to help address the scientific question(s) of interest. The extent of visit will vary depending upon the module that the extramural collaborator has developed.
Collaboration Plan:
Applications for this program will be submitted by the extramural institution with the NCATS intramural scientist(s) integrated into the application as described in the Collaboration Plan. Annual progress reports will be prepared and submitted by the extramural institutions, with the participation and input of the intramural investigator(s) and should include the project findings, publications, data and resource-sharing and impact of the collaborative project. This collaborative translational research between NCATS intramural scientists and extramural investigators will involve either a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) or Research Collaboration Agreement (RCA), which will need to be executed for projects deemed scientifically meritorious by peer review and prior to funding. NCATS will provide CRADA or RCA template documents to help streamline the interaction between NCATS intramural scientists and extramural investigators. These template agreements can be found on https://ncats.nih.gov/alliances/forms.Questions regarding any of these agreements can be referred to the NCATS Office of Strategic Alliances at [email protected]. Applicants should review this document and consult with their institutes about their willingness to agree to the conditions well in advance of submitting an application to this FOA. The CRADA or RCA will need to be executed after the application has been identified for funding. While the CRADA or RCA may not be in place prior to application submission, a statement from the applicant’s Sponsored Research Office that they agree, in principle, to the conditions of the CRADA/RCA should be included in the application.
Important: As indicated above, potential applicants are required to consult with the Director of Automation and Compound Management, NCATS DPI (refer to the NCATS Intramural Program contacts below). Early contact provides an opportunity for NCATS staff to discuss the program scope and goals and to provide information and guidance. Applications submitted without prior consultation with the NCATS DPI staff will be deemed incomplete and will not undergo review.
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Cooperative Agreement: A support mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this FOA.
The OER Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this FOA.
Need help determining whether you are doing a clinical trial?
NCATS intends to commit $4,000,000 in FY 2021 to fund 2 awards. Future year amounts will depend on annual appropriations.
Application budgets are limited to $750,000 direct costs per year for the UG3 phase and $1,000,000 in direct costs per year for the UH3 phase. Application budgets need to reflect the actual needs of the proposed project.
The project period is limited to 2 years for the UG3 phase and 4 years for the UH3 phase.
The total project period is limited to a maximum of 5 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this FOA.
Higher Education Institutions
The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
For-Profit Organizations
Local Governments
Federal Governments
Other
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
Applicant organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. The NIH Policy on Late Submission of Grant Applications states that failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission.
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with his/her organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
This program requires the full collaboration of the extramural PD/PI of the applicant institution and the intramural investigator(s). Accordingly, the Multiple PD/PI model is allowed, but not required. For those applicants opting not to use the Multiple PD/PI model, the intramural investigator can hold any role other than the multiple PD/PI role. Applications must include at least one intramural scientist as either a Program Director/Principal Investigator or collaborator.
This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Only one application per institution (normally identified by having a unique DUNS number or NIH IPF number) is allowed.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time. This means that the NIH will not accept:
Only one application per institution (normally identified by having a unique DUNS number or NIH IPF number) is allowed.
The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this FOA. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
Letter of Intent
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
By the date listed in Part 1. Overview Information, prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
The letter of intent should be sent to:
Carol Lambert, Ph.D.
Telephone: 301-435-0814
Email: [email protected]
All page limitations described in the SF424 Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this FOA.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
Other Attachments:
The following attachments must be included, as applicable.
Collaboration Plan:
Applications must include a Collaboration Plan, describing how the proposed collaboration will be maintained throughout the duration of the award.
The following areas should be addressed:
The filename "Collaboration Plan-PI-NAME.pdf" should be used, must not exceed 50 characters, and will be reflected in the final image bookmarking for easy access by reviewers. The Collaboration Plan is limited to 5 pages. Applications that do not include the Collaboration Plan will be considered incomplete and will not be reviewed.
Milestone Plan:
Applications must include a Milestone Plan. The Milestone plan should:
The filename "Milestone Plan-PI-NAME.pdf" should be used, must not exceed 50 characters, and will be reflected in the final image bookmarking for easy access by reviewers. The Milestone Plan is limited to 3 pages. Applications that do not include the Milestone Plan will be considered incomplete and will not be reviewed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be with the following modifications. .
Budget Justification:
Because of the anticipated complexity of the budget information and the need to clearly delineate costs for the extramural awardee, applicants must submit a detailed R&R budget. Submission of a Modular Budget is not allowed for this FOA.
The budget request for this FOA must distinguish between extramural costs and the NIH intramural investigator costs. Extramural costs are associated with the extramural investigator and the applicant organization. NIH intramural investigator costs are those required by the intramural investigator for carrying out the proposed work and which are specifically identified with the project.
During the UG3 phase, it is anticipated that most of the work will be performed at the extramural laboratory, while during the UH3 phase work will be primarily performed at NCATS. The extramural budget needs to be scientifically justified and reflect the work that will be carried by the extramural laboratory.
Extramural Grantee Costs:
Extramural costs may include such items as salary support for the extramural PD/PI and staff at the applicant organization, supplies, laboratory animals, data analysis, and other allowable costs for work performed at the (extramural) applicant organization, as well as travel costs for the extramural investigator(s).
F&A (Indirect) Costs: Applicant organizations are reminded that Facilities and Administrative (F&A) or “indirect costs” are allowable for only the allowable extramural costs of the project.
Intramural Investigator Costs:
The requests by NIH intramural scientists will be limited to the incremental costs required for participation. Intramural investigator costs may include salary for contract staff to be specifically hired under a temporary appointment for the project, consultant costs, supplies, and other items typically listed under Other Expenses. Budget requests from the NIH intramural program may not include any salary and related fringe benefits for career, career conditional or other federal employees (civilian or uniformed service) with permanent appointments under existing position ceilings or any costs related to administrative or facilities support (equivalent to Facilities and Administrative costs). Although the budget request may not include salary support for such individuals, it should indicate person months for any key personnel. Resources required need to be determined before the research protocol can be approved by the respective NIH Institute/Center. Prospective applicants are strongly encouraged to contact NCATS staff to discuss intramural investigator costs.
Once the intramural investigator costs are known, the extramural applicant will enter this amount as a "subaward" budget in the application, and attach appropriate justification and documentation, including any spreadsheets as appropriate. The intramural investigator's costs will not be included in the award paid to the grantee. Support for intramural participation will be provided by a budget allocation within the NIH.
Peer reviewers will evaluate the appropriateness of the IRP staff and budget request for the work proposed and will therefore need to know the level of effort being proposed to conduct the work.
Additional Guidance on Budget Preparation
The project will initially focus on development of a module at the extramural site. Once a module is completed at the end of the UG3 phase, extramural investigators will transfer the module and associated protocol to NCATS site for validation and incorporation into NCATS ASPIRE platform. Extramural team is advised to identify an extramural laboratory member who will spend time at NCATS during the UH3 phase in order to facilitate the success of the project. The application budget should reflect actual needs of the proposed project and align with the distribution of the work during the project.
The budget requests for this FOA are more complex and will require more coordination than those of other programs. Therefore, extramural investigators are encouraged to begin discussions about logistics and budget issues with their intramural collaborators and with NIH staff in the early phases of application preparation.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Letters of Support:
1. Letter of Collaboration from NCATS DPI:
Applications submitted in response to this FOA must include a current (i.e., within 2 months of application due date) letter from the Scientific Director of the NCATS Division of Preclinical Innovation to confirm that the NCATS ASPIRE Laboratory will be able to accommodate the proposed research and that the NCATS intramural scientist will be able to collaborate on the project. Applications submitted without this letter of support will be considered incomplete and will not be reviewed. Note: the letter of collaboration from Scientific Director of NCATS/DPI does not constitute pre-approval of the application or award.
2. Letter of Support from Applicant Institution on CRADA:
The application should include a statement from the applicant’s Sponsored Research Office (or equivalent) that they agree, in principle, to the conditions of the CRADA/RCA. Failure to include this statement could result in delays should the application be identified for funding. For more details please see Collaboration Plan in Additional Considerations Section above.
3. Letter(s) of Support from Collaborator(s):
Letter(s) from other collaborators/consultants confirming participation should also be included.
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
The following modifications also apply:
Only limited Appendix materials are allowed.
Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered “Yes” to the question “Are Human Subjects Involved?” on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start).All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.
Foreign (non-U.S.) institutions must follow policies described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, and procedures for foreign institutions described throughout the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
See Part 1. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov.
Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Policy on Late Application Submission.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the SF424(R&R) Application Package. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this FOA for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Applications Involving the NIH Intramural Research Program
The requests by NIH intramural scientists will be limited to the incremental costs required for participation. As such, these requests will not include any salary and related fringe benefits for career, career conditional or other Federal employees (civilian or uniformed service) with permanent appointments under existing position ceilings or any costs related to administrative or facilities support (equivalent to Facilities and Administrative or F&A costs). These costs may include salary for staff to be specifically hired under a temporary appointment for the project, consultant costs, equipment, supplies, travel, and other items typically listed under Other Expenses. Applicants should indicate the number of person-months devoted to the project, even if no funds are requested for salary and fringe benefits.
If selected, appropriate funding will be provided by the NIH Intramural Program. NIH intramural scientists will participate in this program as PDs/PIs in accord with the Terms and Conditions provided in this FOA. Intellectual property will be managed in accord with established policy of the NIH in compliance with Executive Order 10096, as amended, 45 CFR Part 7; patent rights for inventions developed in NIH facilities are NIH property unless NIH waives its rights.
Should an extramural application include the collaboration with an intramural scientist, no funds for the support of the intramural scientist may be requested in the application. The intramural scientist may submit a separate request for intramural funding as described above.
Pre-Application Webinar
A technical assistance webinar will be held for potential applicants from 12:00 - 1:00 pm (ET) on Wednesday, April 7, 2021. NIH staff will be available to answer questions related to this and companion FOA.
To join the webinar, pre-registration is required. Webinar information will be provided upon request to [email protected].
Potential applicants are encouraged to submit questions by March 31, 2021 to [email protected].
Slides and FAQs will be available at https://ncats.nih.gov/aspire/funding approximately 7 days following the completion of the webinar. Participation in this webinar, although encouraged, is optional and is not required for the submission of an application.
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy. Any instructions provided here are in addition to the instructions in the policy.
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
For this particular announcement, note the following:
The UG3/UH3 phased innovation grant supports investigation of novel scientific ideas or new interventions, model systems, tools, or technologies that have the potential for significant impact on biomedical or behavioral and social sciences research. A UG3/UH3 grant application is not required to have extensive preliminary data, background material or preliminary information, but these may be included if available. Appropriate justification for the proposed work can also be provided through literature citations, data from other sources, or, when available, from investigator-generated data. Accordingly, reviewers will focus their evaluation on the conceptual framework, the level of innovation, and the potential to significantly advance our knowledge or understanding. Reviewers will assign a single impact score for the entire application, which includes the UG3 and UH3 phases.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Significance
Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? Is the prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project rigorous? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?
Specific to this FOA:
Investigator(s)
Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or those in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project?
Specific to this FOA:
Collaboration Plan
Innovation
Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?
Specific to this FOA:
Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Have the investigators included plans to address weaknesses in the rigor of prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project? Have the investigators presented strategies to ensure a robust and unbiased approach, as appropriate for the work proposed? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed? Have the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex, for studies in vertebrate animals or human subjects?
Specific to this FOA:
Milestones:
If the project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, are the plans to address 1) the protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion or exclusion of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults), justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?
Environment
Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?
Specific to this FOA:
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Protections for Human Subjects
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Individuals Across the Lifespan
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults) to determine if it is justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
Vertebrate Animals
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following criteria: (1) description of proposed procedures involving animals, including species, strains, ages, sex, and total number to be used; (2) justifications for the use of animals versus alternative models and for the appropriateness of the species proposed; (3) interventions to minimize discomfort, distress, pain and injury; and (4) justification for euthanasia method if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. Reviewers will assess the use of chimpanzees as they would any other application proposing the use of vertebrate animals. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animal Section.
Biohazards
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
Resubmissions
Not applicable
Renewals
Not applicable
Revisions
Not applicable
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Applications from Foreign Organizations
Reviewers will assess whether the project presents special opportunities for furthering research programs through the use of unusual talent, resources, populations, or environmental conditions that exist in other countries and either are not readily available in the United States or augment existing U.S. resources.
Select Agent Research
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Resource Sharing Plans
Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable: (1) Data Sharing Plan; (2) Sharing Model Organisms; and (3) Genomic Data Sharing Plan (GDS).
Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources:
For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, reviewers will comment on the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Budget and Period of Support
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by NCATS, in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
Applications may undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Appeals of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this FOA.
Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this FOA. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the NCATS Advisory Council. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization for successful applications. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via email to the grantee’s business official.
Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs.
Any application awarded in response to this FOA will be subject to terms and conditions found on the Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants website. This includes any recent legislation and policy applicable to awards that is highlighted on this website.
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Grantee institutions must ensure that protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the awardee must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities. More information is provided at Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants.
Recipients of federal financial assistance (FFA) from HHS must administer their programs in compliance with federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, age and, in some circumstances, religion, conscience, and sex. This includes ensuring programs are accessible to persons with limited English proficiency. The HHS Office for Civil Rights provides guidance on complying with civil rights laws enforced by HHS. Please see https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-providers/provider-obligations/index.html and http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/understanding/section1557/index.html.
HHS recognizes that research projects are often limited in scope for many reasons that are nondiscriminatory, such as the principal investigator’s scientific interest, funding limitations, recruitment requirements, and other considerations. Thus, criteria in research protocols that target or exclude certain populations are warranted where nondiscriminatory justifications establish that such criteria are appropriate with respect to the health or safety of the subjects, the scientific study design, or the purpose of the research. For additional guidance regarding how the provisions apply to NIH grant programs, please contact the Scientific/Research Contact that is identified in Section VII under Agency Contacts of this FOA.
Please contact the HHS Office for Civil Rights for more information about obligations and prohibitions under federal civil rights laws at https://www.hhs.gov/ocr/about-us/contact-us/index.html or call 1-800-368-1019 or TDD 1-800-537-7697.
In accordance with the statutory provisions contained in Section 872 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417), NIH awards will be subject to the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) requirements. FAPIIS requires Federal award making officials to review and consider information about an applicant in the designated integrity and performance system (currently FAPIIS) prior to making an award. An applicant, at its option, may review information in the designated integrity and performance systems accessible through FAPIIS and comment on any information about itself that a Federal agency previously entered and is currently in FAPIIS. The Federal awarding agency will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgement about the applicant’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants as described in 45 CFR Part 75.205 “Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants.” This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) administrative guidelines, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) grant administration regulations at 45 CFR Parts 75, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the awardees is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the awardees for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the awardees and the NIH as defined below.
The PD(s)/PI(s) will have the primary responsibility as follows:
Upon completion or termination of the project, ensuring all study materials, tools, databases and procedures developed from the project are broadly available (e.g., putting into the public domain) or made accessible to the research community according to the NIH-approved plan submitted for each project, for making data and materials available to the scientific community and the NIH for the conduct of research. The data sharing plan should include a plan to accomplish this within 90 days of the end of the study.
Publications
The Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) will be responsible for the timely submission of all abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews (co)authored by project investigators and supported in whole or in part under this Cooperative Agreement. The PD/PI and Project Leaders are requested to submit manuscripts to the NIH Project Scientist within two weeks of acceptance for publication so that an up-to-date summary of program accomplishments can be maintained. Publications and oral presentations of work conducted under this Cooperative Agreement are the responsibility of the Principal Investigator and appropriate Project Leaders and will require appropriate acknowledgement of NIH support. Timely publication of major findings is expected.
Communication Plans
The Principal Investigator(s) will be responsible for:
Intellectual Property
The awardee is solely responsible for the timely acquisition of all appropriate proprietary rights, licenses, and all materials needed for the applicant to perform the project.
Before, during, and subsequent to the award, the U.S. Government is not required to obtain for the awardee any proprietary rights, including intellectual property rights, or any materials needed by the awardee to perform the project. The awardee is required to report to the U.S. Government all inventions made in the performance of the project, as specified by 35 U.S.C. Sect. 202 (Bayh-Dole Act). Awardees will retain custody of and have primary rights to the data and resources developed under these awards, subject to Government rights of access consistent with current HHS, PHS, and NIH policies.
NIH staff have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below:
NCATS will designate program staff, including a Program Officer, to provide stewardship and administrative oversight of the cooperative agreement. The Program Officer will be named in the Notice of Award (NoA).
The Program Official will:
The NIH Intramural Scientist will be responsible for:
The NIH intramural scientist is subject to the same publication/authorship policies as the official NIH publication policy.
The NIH reserves the right to curtail or phase out the award in the event of (1) a substantial shortfall in accomplishing the management goals and responsibilities as stated in the reviewed application, (2) failure to meet procedures and milestones, and/or (3) substantive changes in the management of award(s) that are not in keeping with the objectives of the FOA.
Areas of Joint Responsibility include:
Since the purpose of this FOA is to establish and/or further develop collaborative arrangements between extramural and intramural investigators, many responsibilities are shared between awardees and NIH staff and will require close coordination. Responsibilities will be divided between awardees and NIH staff, as described above. As stated above under primary PI/PD responsibilities, awardees will participate in monthly calls with the NIH and semi-annual meetings. Quarterly reports will be submitted per e-mail to NCATS ASPIRE program staff. Annual progress reports will be prepared and submitted by the extramural institutions, with the participation and input of the intramural investigator(s) and should include the project findings, publications, impact of the project, a description of what NCATS ASPIRE laboratory unique resources were utilized and the new intramural-extramural partnerships that developed. This will be evaluated by the program official/IC program director.
Data
Awardees will retain custody of and have primary rights to the data and resources developed under these awards, subject to Government rights of access consistent with current HHS, PHS, and NIH policies.
Performance Requirements:
Dispute Resolution:
Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between award recipients and the NIH may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened. It will have three members: a designee of the awardee, and NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the awardee's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulation 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and DHHS regulation 45 CFR Part 16.
T&C Inclusions and Modifications
The Terms and Conditions of Award will include references to the currently approved versions of the Collaboration Plan and the Sharing Plans for Resources and Data. Before the initial award is made, NIH and the awardees may negotiate changes or additions to the versions of these plans in the application. Future changes or additions to these plans may be developed by the NIH and the PD(s)/PI(s) and negotiated with the awardee. Changes will be documented by an exchange of correspondence and the updated plans will become part of the Terms and Conditions of a revised Notice of Award.A final RPPR, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act), includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later. All awardees of applicable NIH grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at www.fsrs.gov on all subawards over $25,000. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement.
In accordance with the regulatory requirements provided at 45 CFR 75.113 and Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75, recipients that have currently active Federal grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all Federal awarding agencies with a cumulative total value greater than $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of a Federal award, must report and maintain the currency of information reported in the System for Award Management (SAM) about civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings in connection with the award or performance of a Federal award that reached final disposition within the most recent five-year period. The recipient must also make semiannual disclosures regarding such proceedings. Proceedings information will be made publicly available in the designated integrity and performance system (currently FAPIIS). This is a statutory requirement under section 872 of Public Law 110-417, as amended (41 U.S.C. 2313). As required by section 3010 of Public Law 111-212, all information posted in the designated integrity and performance system on or after April 15, 2011, except past performance reviews required for Federal procurement contracts, will be publicly available. Full reporting requirements and procedures are found in Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75 – Award Term and Conditions for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk (Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues)
Finding Help Online: http://grants.nih.gov/support/ (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
General Grants Information (Questions regarding application instructions, application processes, and NIH grant resources)
Email: [email protected] (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-945-7573
Grants.gov Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and Workspace)
Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726
Email: [email protected]
Extramural Program
Dobrila D. Rudnicki, Ph.D.
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Telephone: 301-594-2080
Email: [email protected]
Danilo A. Tagle, Ph.D.
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Telephone: 301-594-8064
Email: [email protected]
Leah Croucher, Ph.D.
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Telephone: 301-594-8921
Email: [email protected]
Intramural Program:
Anton Simeonov, Ph.D.
Director, NCATS Division of Preclinical Innovation
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Telephone: 301-217-5721
Email: [email protected]
Sam Michael, Ph.D.
CIO, Director of Compound Management and Automation
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Telephone: 301-827-7796
Email: [email protected]
Carol Lambert, Ph.D.
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Telephone: 301-435-0814
Email: [email protected]
Shannon Oden
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Telephone: 301-594-3028
Email: [email protected]
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 75.