Full Text RR-94-002 INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AWARD (IDeA) NIH GUIDE, Volume 22, Number 44, December 10, 1993 RFA: RR-94-002 P.T. 14 Keywords: Biomedical Research, Multidiscipl Behavioral/Social Studies/Service National Center for Research Resources Letter of Intent Receipt Date: January 17, 1994 Application Receipt Date: February 23, 1994 PURPOSE The National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) invites research grant applications for the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) program. The NIH IDeA is a merit-based, peer reviewed program initiated in response to Congressional intent to broaden the geographical distribution of NIH funding for biomedical/behavioral research. Primary goals of the IDeA program are to (1) enhance the competitiveness of research institutions in the IDeA eligible states (see below) for NIH-funded grants and (2) increase the probability of long-term growth of NIH-competitive funding to investigators at institutions from these eligible states. This Request For Application (RFA) describes a two-year development program to increase, strengthen, and sustain the biomedical/behavioral research competitiveness of institutions within selected states. It is expected that institutional development goals will be proposed beyond that period. The program will be similar in some aspects to the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) initiated by the National Science Foundation (NSF). For example, EPSCoR-like committees are responsible for selecting the one application that will be submitted by an institution on behalf of that state. In addition to the IDeA eligible states and in response to specific Congressional intent, all accredited Schools of Chiropractic Medicine are also invited to apply. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This RFA, IDeA, is related to all priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report: Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238). ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Eligibility is limited to institutions in IDeA eligible states, and Schools of Chiropractic Medicine. IDeA eligible states include all NSF-EPSCoR states and all those states with a total funding level of less than $30 million from the NIH in FY 1992. Eligible institutions in those states include domestic for-profit and non-profit organizations public and private, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, research foundations, and laboratories. It is the responsibility of the State-EPSCoR committees or comparable committees to select institutions in their states that have limited NIH funding but for which both the states and the institutions have a mutual agreement and commitment to the development of the biomedical/behavioral research infrastructure. Collaborative and cooperative programs between or among institutions are allowable. The applicant institution must perform a substantive role in the conduct of the planned research project activities and may not serve primarily as a conduit for the transmission of funds to another party or multiple parties. States which were awarded grants under RFA RR-93-001 may also submit new applications from the same or a different institution under this RFA; however, renewal applications will not be accepted. Only one application can be submitted per state. IDeA eligible states under these criteria are: Alabama Nebraska Alaska Nevada Arkansas New Mexico Delaware North Dakota Hawaii Oklahoma Idaho Puerto Rico Kansas South Carolina Kentucky South Dakota Louisiana Vermont Maine West Virginia Mississippi Wyoming Montana Applications from Schools of Chiropractic Medicine do not have to be reviewed at the state level but only one application can be submitted per institution. Eligible Schools of Chiropractic Medicine are accredited by the Council on Chiropractic Education and include: Cleveland Chiropractic College of Cleveland University - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA Cleveland Chiropractic College, Kansas City, MO Life Chiropractic College, Marietta, GA Life Chiropractic College - West, San Lorenzo, CA Logan College of Chiropractic, Chesterfield, MO Los Angeles College of Chiropractic, Whittier, CA National College of Chiropractic, Lombard, IL New York Chiropractic College, Seneca Falls, NY Northwestern College of Chiropractic, Bloomington, MN Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, LA Palmer College of Chiropractic - West, Sunnyvale, CA Parker College of Chiropractic, Dallas, TX Texas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, TX Western States Chiropractic College, Portland, OR Applications from institutions with significant minority enrollments are especially encouraged. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT This RFA will use the for exploratory grants (P20) mechanism. Applicants will be responsible for the planning, direction, and content of the proposed programs. Except as otherwise stated in this RFA, awards will be administered under PHS grants policy as stated in the Public Health Service Grants Policy Statement. The total project period for applications submitted in response to this RFA may not exceed two years. FUNDS AVAILABLE This RFA is a one-time solicitation. Approximately $785,000 will be available from NCRR in FY 1994 to support this initiative. Subject to the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications, it is anticipated that approximately six to eight awards will be made. Total direct costs requested by the applicant institution, including the direct and indirect costs required for the third party participants, may not exceed $100,000 for each year. Indirect costs will be provided. This initiative is provided for in the FY 1994 NCRR appropriation. The anticipated award date is September 1, 1994. Matching Requirement To ensure that adequate resources are available, IDeA awards require a minimum of one-to-one non-Federal match. Each dollar of NIH support requested including both direct and indirect costs, must be matched by at least one dollar from state, institutional, or private sector sources. In-kind contributions of faculty or technical support salaries, facilities and equipment supporting existing biomedical/behavioral activities may not be used to satisfy the one-to-one matching funds requirement. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background The mission of the NIH is to expand fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems, to apply that knowledge to extend the health of human lives, and to reduce the burdens resulting from disease and disability. Through its institutes and centers, each with its own research mission, the NIH provides funds for research and research training activities to institutions. Each funding unit makes awards on a competitive basis after applications are assessed for technical and scientific merit and program relevance through a two-stage process of peer-review. For many years, the NIH has made a special effort to stimulate research in educational institutions that traditionally have not received significant levels of funding through the NIH. For example, the purpose of the Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) program, initiated in 1985, is to enhance the research environment at such institutions by providing support to individual faculty at domestic institutions offering baccalaureate or advanced degrees in the health-related sciences. Research Goals The IDeA program will address objectives similar to those of the AREA program, but on institutional and state-wide levels. NCRR acknowledges that, due to variability among potential applications, the size and scope of the IDeA program will depend in large part upon the current size and extent of the biomedical/behavioral research environment of the applicant institutions. It is recommended that, in order to achieve maximum impact of the available funds, institutions propose innovative research activities that will stimulate sustainable improvements in the capacities of institutions in eligible states to compete successfully for NIH funds and to enhance the research competitiveness of the institutions in future years. Examples of activities include: o development of infrastructure necessary for multidisciplinary approaches for conducting broad-based research; o faculty development; o mentoring of junior faculty as they participate in research projects. In general, the applicant institution should provide evidence that an IDeA award is necessary to enhance its capability for health-related research and that there are state/institutional or other private resources committed to improve and sustain their programs. The research plan should provide sufficient information to allow the reviewers to assess the program in terms of the stated Review Criteria. The narrative portion should provide: (a) comprehensive information about the institution's current involvement in biomedical and health-related behavioral research; (b) a description of the long-range institutional research development goals to be achieved; (c) a complete description of the specific activities to achieve the goals of the program, including an evaluation plan to measure the progress of the program and the procedures to sustain the achievements obtained with IDeA funds after termination of the award; (d) a description of the administrative mechanisms to organize and oversee implementation of the plan; (e) evidence of the institution's commitment to achievement of the program goals; and (f) letters of commitment from those persons whose cooperation is critical to the success of the program including a statement from the institution's highest ranking administrative authority explaining how the IDeA application is consistent with the institution's (and/or the state's) long-range objectives to enhance the biomedical/behavioral research infrastructure and to achieve research competitiveness at the national level. Biographical data for participating scientists and chief administrative personnel and a detailed budget explaining and justifying the support requested should be prepared according to the form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) format. Requests to develop institutional research infrastructure should be made in sufficient detail to assess the potential impact on investigators and/or departments. If support for research projects is requested, up to a maximum of four research projects may be included and must be described in sufficient detail to permit evaluation of the scientific merit of each project. This information is necessary to justify an IDeA award and to provide evidence that the research that will result from the award will be of high quality and be likely to compete successfully for future Federal funding. A separate detailed budget must be provided for each of these activities. Budget Considerations Allowable Costs In general, the direct costs listed in the PHS Grants Policy Statement as allowable for research grants are also allowable for the IDeA. Funds requested for the IDeA program may be used to support the following: o central shared equipment and other research resources o recruitment of faculty and other research personnel o development of research data to be included in research grant applications submitted to NIH for support through established support mechanisms o development of research skills by investigators o research salary support of key investigators o consultants o establishment of research laboratories o grant related support personnel o other direct costs of development of institutional research capability Costs Not Allowable o training o construction o salary for teaching and other non-research activities o institutional grants and contract office, central accounting, and similar activities o research project support for established investigators unless necessary for temporary start-up costs as in recruitment, or relocation or initiation of new research directions. Support provided through the IDeA program may not replace existing state, institutional or Federal research support. IDeA support may not be used to maintain current biomedical/behavioral activities, but must be used to develop innovative ways to enhance the quality and competitiveness of the state institutional biomedical/behavioral research base. STUDY POPULATIONS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF NIH POLICIES CONCERNING INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY POPULATIONS NIH policy is that applications for NIH clinical research grants and cooperative agreements are required to include minorities and women in study populations so that research findings can be of benefit to all persons at risk of the disease, disorder or condition under study; special emphasis must be placed on the need for inclusion of minorities and women in studies of diseases, disorders and conditions which disproportionately affect them. This policy is intended to apply to males and females of all ages. If women or minorities are excluded or inadequately represented in clinical research, particularly in proposed population-based studies, a clear compelling rationale must be provided. The composition of the proposed study population must be described in terms of gender and racial/ethnic group. In addition, gender and racial/ethnic issues must be addressed in developing a research design and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the study. This information must be included in the Form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) in Sections 1-4 of the Research Plan and summarized in Section 5, Human Subjects. Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of including the broadest possible representation of minority groups. However, NIH recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in all research projects to include representation of the full array of United States racial/ethnic minority populations (i.e., Native Americans including American Indians or Alaskan Natives}, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics). The rationale for studies on single minority population groups should be provided. For the purpose of this policy, clinical research is defined as human biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention (and preventive strategies), diagnosis, or treatment of diseases, disorders or conditions, including, but not limited to, clinical trails. The usual NIH policies concerning research on human subjects also apply. Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues cannot be identified or linked to individuals are excluded. However, every effort should be made to include human tissues from women and racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to apply the results of the study broadly, and this should be addressed by applicants. If the required information is not contained within the application, the application will be returned. Peer reviewers will address specifically whether the research plan in the application conforms to these policies. If the representation of women or minorities in a study design is inadequate to answer the scientific question(s) addressed and the justification for the selected study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific weakness of deficiency in the study design and reflected in assigning the priority score to the application. All applications for clinical research submitted to NIH are required to address these policies. NIH funding components will not award grants or cooperative agreements that do not comply with these policies. LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by January 17, 1994, a letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed program, the name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator, and the number and title of the RFA in response to which the application may be submitted. Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information contained is helpful in planning for the review of applications. It allows NCRR staff to estimate the potential review workload and to avoid possible conflict of interest in the review. The letter of intent is to be sent to Dr. Marjorie A. Tingle at the address listed under INQUIRIES. APPLICATION PROCEDURES Applications are to be submitted using form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91). These forms are available in most institutional offices of sponsored research and may be obtained from the Office of Grants Information, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, 5333 Westbard Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone (301) 710-0267. Applicants must follow the instructions provided in the PHS 398 and clarifying instructions, below. There is a 25-page limitation for the "Research Plan". Note that the appendix is not to be used to circumvent the page limitations in the Research Plan (see page 24 of form PHS 398 for specific instructions in using an appendix). Applications that do not follow all of the instructions for the form PHS 398 will be returned. A mini workshop will be held in the Washington, DC area in early February to provide technical assistance in the preparation of applications and to assist in the development and implementation of such plans. Additional instructions for application face page and budget: The RFA label in the PHS 398 kit must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the application. Failure to use this label could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. In addition, the RFA number and title must be typed on line 2a of the face page form, the "YES" box must be checked, and "P20" typed in item 2b. Items 4 and 5 on the face page of the application must be completed. Where appropriate, IRB (Institutional Review Board) or IACUC (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee) approval must be obtained for each research project for which NIH support is requested. Item 6 - Dates of Entire Proposed Project Period. The total proposed project period should begin on September 1, 1994, and may not exceed two years in length. Item 7 - Costs Requested for Initial Budget Period. In 7a. enter the Total Direct Costs for Initial Budget Period as requested on (Form Page 4). In 7b. enter the Total Costs Requested for Initial Budget Period. This is the total of the direct costs from (Form Page 4) and the indirect costs for the initial budget period (3a) from the Checklist. Item 8 - Costs Requested for Entire Proposed Project Period. In 8a. enter the Total Direct Costs for Entire Project Period as requested on (Form Page 5). In 8b. enter the Total Costs Requested for Entire Proposed Project Period. This is the sum of the total direct costs from (Form Page 5) and the indirect costs for the entire proposed project period (3b) from the Checklist. Item 9 - Performance Sites. Indicate names and addresses of all sites where work described in the Research Plan will be conducted. (See also page 14 in Form PHS 398.) (Form Page 4) - Detailed Budget for Initial Budget Period This budget must detail only the funds being requested from NIH for the first year. Matching funds from the institution or third-parties are to be described (or detailed on a budget page) separately. A separate detailed budget page must be submitted for each consortium institution. (See also page 18 in Form PHS 398.) If funds are being requested for more than one project, then a detailed budget for each project must be submitted. (Form Page 5) - Budget for Entire Proposed Project Period. This page must detail only the funds being requested from NIH for the two-year project period. The signed, typewritten original of the application, including the Checklist, and three exact photocopies of the signed application must be submitted to: Division of Research Grants National Institutes of Health Westwood Building, Room 240 Bethesda, MD 20892** At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application must also be sent to Dr. Marjorie A. Tingle at the address listed under INQUIRIES. Applications must be submitted by February 23, 1994. Applications submitted after this date will be returned to the applicant. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Review of IDeA applications for scientific and technical merit will be performed by an ad hoc review committee convened by the Office of Review, NCRR. Applications will undergo a second level of review by the National Advisory Research Resources Council. Criteria for review of the overall application include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Merit of the research development goals to be achieved by the institution and described in sufficient detail within the IDeA application; 2. Merit of the plan proposed to achieve the research development goals; and, 3. Quality of the research for which support is requested from NIH. Criteria for review of infrastructure and research projects include: o Relevance of proposed project to institutional plan for expansion of biomedical/behavioral research capacity; o Significance and relevance of the proposed research problem and potential for publishable results and continued future funding; o The technical merit and appropriateness of the research plan, including specific aims, experimental design, methodology, consideration of alternatives, data analysis, scope and timetable; o Adequacy of resources, including background and training of the principal investigator and other personnel and availability and suitability of specialized facilities and equipment; 4. Research qualifications of existing and proposed personnel related to the IDeA award; 5. Overall administrative strengths of the program; 6. Evidence of the commitment of the applicant institution and the state to achieve the research development goals and to sustain those achievements; and, 7. Probability that the research development goals will be achieved and sustained, and that high quality health research will result. Special emphasis will be placed on the impact of the proposed program on the institution(s) and the state and its potential to obtain additional NIH research support to continue and expand its activities. AWARD CRITERIA In making funding decisions, NCRR will give consideration to ensure program balance among the various types of programs and/or geographic distribution. Consideration will also be given to focus on reaching minority, rural, and other underserved and disadvantaged individuals. INQUIRIES Written and telephone inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Prospective applicants are advised to communicate with NCRR program and grants management staff who are available to assist applicants to ensure that the objectives, structure and budget format for the application are acceptable. Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues and address the letter of intent to: Dr. Marjorie A. Tingle Biomedical Research Support Program National Center for Research Resources Westwood Building, Room 848 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 594-7947 Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Ms. Mary V. Niemiec Office of Grants and Contracts Management National Center for Research Resources Westwood Building, Room 849 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 594-7955 AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS Awards will be made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Title III, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended, 42 USC 241) and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Part 74. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. .
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||||