Release Date:  October 22, 2001


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, (NIOSH)

Letter of Intent:          November 7, 2001
Application Receipt Date:  December 27, 2001



The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
invites applications for Exploratory/Developmental Grants (R21) in 
research areas that are relevant to the research goals described 
in the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA).  The overall 
purpose of NORA is to provide a framework for research programs 
that provide the critical knowledge that can be used in preventing 
occupational diseases and injuries and foster our understanding of 
their underlying pathophysiology.  For this RFA, research projects 
must address one of the following areas: 1) Work Organization: 
Cardiovascular Disease, 2)Work Organization: Depression, 3) Health 
Care Workers Including Violence, 4)Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary 
Disease (COPD)and Work, 5) Traumatic Injury, 6) Hearing loss, 
7)Agricultural Injuries To Children, and 8) Intervention 
Effectiveness Research In Occupational Health.  Applications for 
other areas should be submitted to the regular grants program of NIOSH. 

The objective of the exploratory/developmental mechanism (R21) is 
to encourage applications from institutions that are interested in 
testing innovative or conceptually creative ideas that are 
scientifically sound and may advance our understanding of safety 
and occupational health.  Another objective is to encourage 
necessary initial development to provide a basis for important 
future research. 

These are short-term awards (up to two years) with limited funding 
(maximum $75,000 per year for direct costs).  Applicants are 
encouraged to use this mechanism to explore the feasibility of an 
innovative research question or approach, which may not qualify 
through existing research grant programs, or may not be 
competitive as a standard research project grant (R01). 

Potential applicants should also be aware of the program 
announcements for the NIOSH Small Grant (R03) Program PA-99-144.  
This small grant program is for pilot studies with funding 
requests for a maximum of  $25,000 direct costs per year for up to 
two years.  This program announcement is also available on the 
NIOSH Home Page; You may also 
refer to


CDC is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease 
prevention objectives of Healthy People 2010, a national 
activity to reduce morbidity and mortality and improve the quality 
of life.  This announcement is related to the focus area of 
Occupational Safety and Health.  The internet site is:


Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign, public and 
private nonprofit and for-profit organizations and by governments 
and their agencies; that is, universities, colleges, research 
institutions, hospitals, other public and private nonprofit and 
for-profit organizations, State and local governments or their 
bona fide agents, including the District of Columbia, the 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth 
of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the 
Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall 
Islands, and the Republic of Palau, federally recognized Indian 
tribal governments, Indian tribes, or Indian tribal organizations, 
and small, minority, and women-owned businesses that meet the 
above criteria.  Racial/ethnic minority individuals, women, and 
persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply as Principal 

Note: Title 2 of the United States Code section 1611 states that 
an organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal 
Revenue Code that engages in lobbying activities is not eligible 
to receive Federal funds constituting an award, grant, or loan.


This mechanism of support will be the individual research project 
grant (R21).  Responsibility for the planning, direction, and 
execution of the proposed project will be solely that of the 
applicant.  The total requested project period for an application 
submitted in response to this RFA may not exceed two (2) years.  
This RFA is a one-time solicitation.


Approximately $3,200,000 is available in FY 2002 to fund 32 awards 
under this RFA. The maximum amount that may be requested for an 
award is $75,000 direct cost.  Facilities and Administrative (F&A) 
costs will be awarded based on the negotiated rate at the time of 
the award.  It is expected that the awards will begin on or about 
June 1, 2002 and will be made for a 12-month budget period within 
a project period of up to 2 years.  Funding estimates may change. 
Continuation awards within an approved project period will be made 
on the basis of satisfactory progress as evidenced by required 
reports and the availability of funds.

Use of Funds

Applicants should include in their budgets funds for one trip per 
year for an annual meeting of grantees to be held in Washington, 
D.C.  The purpose of this meeting is to provide an opportunity for 
the exchange and dissemination of scientific information.


In 1996, NIOSH and its partners in the public and private sectors 
developed the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) to 
provide a framework to guide occupational safety and health 
research into the next decade not only for NIOSH, but also for the 
entire occupational safety and health community.  Approximately 
500 organizations and individuals outside NIOSH provided input 
into the development of NORA.  This attempt to guide and 
coordinate research nationally is responsive to a broadly 
perceived need to address systematically those topics that are 
most pressing and most likely to yield gains to the worker and the 

Potential applicants may obtain a copy of the "National 
Occupational Research Agenda" (HHS, CDC, NIOSH Publication 
No.96-115) from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and 
Health, telephone (800) 356-4674.  It is also available on the 
internet at

While applications may involve a wide variety of biomedical, 
behavioral, clinical, socio-culture, or other disciplines, 
relevance to the mission of NIOSH must be clear.  The Institute's 
mission statement, extramural research program descriptions, list 
of special emphasis areas, and active program announcements may be 
found at NIOSH's Internet web site:

This NIOSH Exploratory/Developmental Grant (R21) Program provides 
limited financial support for exploring the feasibility of 
innovative or creative research questions within the research 
interests of NORA.  The overall purpose of this RFA is to 
stimulate investigations in eight priority areas (see below) that 
either have received few applications, have limited grant support 
from NIOSH, or have been identified as priority research needs.

The Research Areas for this RFA are:

o   Work Organization: Cardiovascular Disease 

In the U.S., cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a health problem of 
staggering proportions.  An estimated 58 million Americans have 
CVD, of whom 50 million have hypertension.  Over 7 million 
Americans suffer from coronary heart disease which is responsible 
for more deaths each year in the U.S. than all forms of cancer 
combined.  That occupational factors play a role in the etiology 
of CVD is undisputed.  However, the nature and role of work 
organization as an etiologic factor is unclear.  

Types of research applications that are appropriate for this topic 
include but are not limited to the following areas: (1) role of 
work organization on CVD, and (2) work organization on worker 
groups such as miners, women etc. 


Harlan WR, Sharret AR, Weill H, Turino GM, Berhani NO, Resnekow L. 
Impact of the environment on cardiovascular disease, report of the 
American Heart Association Task Force on environment and the 
cardiovascular system. Circulation 1981;63:243A-6A.

Roseman KD. Cardiovascular disease and environmental exposure. Br 
J Ind Med 1979;36:85-97.

o Work Organization: Depression

Depression has been judged as one of if not the most disabling 
health condition worldwide, judged by sheer prevalence.  Worker 
illness results in nearly 175 million lost workdays and 
productivity losses of $24 billion annually in the U.S. alone.  
However, unlike CVD and other health condition, there is limited 
information on the occupational aspects of depression.  In the 
present environment, the rapid organizational changes expose 
workers to a broad range of stressors with suspected links to 

Types of research applications that are appropriate for this topic 
include but are not limited to the following areas: (1) role of 
work organization on depression, and (2) work organization on 
worker groups such as miners, women etc.


Sauter, SL, Hurrell, JJ Jr, Roberts-Fox, H, Tetrick, LE, and 
Barling, J. 1999. Occupational health psychology: An emerging 
discipline. Industrial Health,37:199-211.

Grosch, J and Murphy, LR. 1998. Occupational differences in 
depression and global health: Results from a national sample of US 
workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 

Revoke DA and May, HJ Occupational stress, social support, and 
depression. Health Psychology, 4 (1), 61-77. 1985 via George Wise, 
Missouri Extension Child and Family Development Specialist, July 

o Health Care Workers, Including Violence

Currently, there are approximately 10 million health care workers 
in the U.S. performing in numerous professional and support 
positions in various work environments (hospitals, laboratories, 
home health care, and emergency services). This number is 
projected to increase to 13 million by 2006. Health care workers 
are at risk to injury or illness from occupational exposures for 
example; hazardous chemicals (solvents and  chemotheraputic 
agents), infectious agents (viruses and bacteria), physical 
(violence and noise), biomechanical (lifting and standing), and 
psychological (stress and work shift).  Approaches to reduce and 
prevent injury and illness seen in other industries and consistent 
with the concept of healthy work organizations have not been 
realized in the heath care system, particularly in the area of 
work-related violence.

Types of research applications that are appropriate for this topic 
include but are not limited to: 1) identification of risk factors 
associated with injury or illness of health care workers, 
2)innovative prevention strategies to reduce injury and illness 
among health care workers, and 3) role of work organizations on 
health care worker violence.


U.S. Department of Labor (OSHA): Guidelines for Preventing 
Workplace Violence for Health Care and Social Service Workers. 
Publication no. 3148, 1998.

o Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Work

COPD is one of the leading respiratory diseases in the U.S. and a 
major cause of morbidity and mortality. Many occupational 
exposures (both by themselves or in combination with smoking) are 
known to cause COPD.  In addition, workplace exposures contribute 
to the development, persistence, and exacerbation of COPD brought 
about through non-occupational causes.  The proportion of COPD 
attributable to occupational exposure in the general population is 
estimated to be 14 percent, providing a point estimate of 14,257 
COPD deaths annually in the United States attributable to 
occupational dust exposure.  

The causal relationship between occupational exposures such as 
coal mine dust and COPD development has been well researched and 
now generally accepted. However, the evidence is either limited, 
suggestive, or non-existent, for other types of occupational 
exposures such as >nuisance dusts=, now called >particulate=.  
Further investigation is required to improve the understanding of 
the contribution of work exposures to the overall population 
burden of COPD, as well as to better understand the types, 
severity, and distribution of the occupational exposures that 
contribute to or result in lung dysfunction.  

Types of research applications that are appropriate for this topic 
include but are not limited to the following areas: 1) the 
assessment of the true extent of COPD associated with workplace 
exposures, including the contribution from exacerbation of non-
occupationally caused COPD by workplace exposures; 2) the 
identification of exposures which cause COPD, including assessment 
of the group of dusts termed >particles not otherwise regulated or 
classified= (PNOR/PNOC) and study of the effects of mixed dust 
exposures; 3) the relationship between various work environments, 
symptom development, accelerated lung function loss, and the 
subsequent development of COPD; 4) documentation of the beneficial 
effects of substantially reducing or eliminating exposure to 
occupational respiratory hazards on the reduction or prevention of 
COPD; 5) evaluation of workplace medical screening/surveillance 
programs or data, obtained from on-going and completed population-
based studies, to improve the understanding of the occupational 
contribution to COPD; and 6) animal models of occupational COPD. 


American Lung Association. 1996. Trends in chronic bronchitis and 
emphysema: morbidity and mortality. New York, NY. pp.1-5.
Frank E. Speizer. Occupational and environmental lung diseases: an 
overview. Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 108, Supplement 
4, August 2000.

Becklake MR.1994. The work relatedness of airways dysfunction. In: 
Proceedings of the 9th international symposium in epidemiology in 
occupational health. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No.94-112:1-28. 

o Traumatic Injury

The risk of occupational traumatic injuries affects all 130 
million U.S. workers to some degree.  In 1998, 2.6 million of the 
5.5 million nonfatal occupational injuries in U.S. private sector 
industries resulted in lost work days, restricted duty, or both.  
Traumatic occupational injuries killed 6,026 Americans in 1998.  
The economic burden from traumatic occupational injuries has been 
estimated at approximately $145 billion (in 1992), in the same 
range as the costs ($160-170 billion) for cancer and circulatory 
diseases. Lack of a well coordinated or integrated approach has 
resulted in the inability of some previous research activities to 
reach a point of impacting the workplace, while others have been 
applied in only limited situations with no plans or mechanism for 
broad-based dissemination.

The proposed projects should take advantage of existing knowledge 
regarding high-risk work activities and known and potential 
interventions.  Intervention projects which assess the practical 
effectiveness of occupational injury prevention interventions 
(e.g., strategies, technologies, and programs) in reducing risks, 
exposures, injuries and their negative economic and social effects 
are of particular interest.  Research should consider feasibility 
and cost effectiveness, as well as disincentives and other 
potential barriers to implementation. 

Topics for this project area include, but are not limited to: 1) 
systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of intervention 
methodologies; 2) practical and usefulness of specific control 
strategies, technologies, or personal protective equipment; 3) 
components of effective programs that reduce traumatic injuries, 
including worker participation, training, engineering solutions, 
and organization or administrative aspects; and 4) identification 
of critical factors( risk factors, prevention strategies, 
evaluation techniques, dissemination and technology transfer 
approaches) for implementing and conducting effective programs 
that reduce or prevent traumatic injuries. Dissemination and 
technology transfer mechanisms could be developed to inform at-
risk populationsBemployers, safety and health practitioners, and 
workers of effective interventions, that would persuade them to 
implement new methods, policies, and partnerships to effect 
positive injury prevention changes in workplaces and companies.

o Hearing Loss

Work-related hearing loss from exposure to noise has long been 
recognized.  However, job-related hearing loss from exposure to 
chemicals in combination with noise has been recognized only 
recently.  Research from the 1990s showed that some workers 
exposed only to chemicals have more risk of occupational hearing 
loss than workers exposed to noise alone  In addition, studies 
have found that workers exposed to both noise and chemicals were 
at much greater risk of hearing loss than workers exposed to 
either noise or chemicals alone.  There is a need for studies that 
will support development of dose-response relationships so that 
exposure limits can be established to protect workers= hearing 
from combined noise and chemical exposures.  

Noise exposure parameters of interest include, but are not limited 
to steady state, fluctuating, intermittent and impulse/impact.  
The chemicals of interest include solvents, metals, insecticides, 
herbicides, pesticides, and asphyxiates.  Populations of interest 
include, youths, miners, construction and agricultural workers.

Types of research applications that are appropriate for this topic 
include but are not limited to the following areas:
(1) systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions 
(2) biological effects and biological responses induced by noise 
or other ototoxic agents including secondary risk factors such as 
hypertension, head trauma, diabetes, blood lipids, and clinical 
therapeutic drugs; (3) individual susceptibility to hearing loss 
induced by noise and/or chemicals and the role of free-radicals 
and antioxidants in the auditory system=s response to noise and 
ototoxic chemicals; (4) evaluation of the dose-response 
relationships between hearing loss and exposure to noise, 
chemicals, or noise and chemicals; and (5) laboratory studies that 
mimic work place noise/chemical exposures are appropriate as long 
as the results are directly applicable to the work place.

o  Agricultural Injuries To Children

Agricultural production consistently ranks among industries with 
the highest rates of work-related injuries and deaths in the 
United States, and is unique with respect to children and 
adolescents.  Projects are sought but not limited to research 
topics that develop new or enhance existing control technologies 
developed to reduce injury to youth exposed to agricultural 
production hazards. Other research topics related to the area of 
agricultural injuries to children are also allowed.  Applications 
should identify the types and geographical distribution of 
agricultural production which will be addressed, and the size and 
characteristics of child and adolescent populations which can 
potentially be impacted by the research findings. Research topics 
of interest include but are not limited to:

Develop New or Enhance Existing Control Technologies

Control technologies, include any strategy which will control the 
exposure of children to agricultural hazards.  Examples of 
research efforts which are appropriate under this priority area 
include, but are not limited to: a) engineering controlsBthese 
could include the development of new or the application and 
evaluation of existing equipment or devices which could prevent 
childhood agricultural injuries (for example, ensuring that 
agricultural structures have proper barriers and warnings, 
developing and evaluating play area designs to reduce child 
exposures to hazards, and developing and evaluating sensor 
technology to notify operators or automatically shut down machines 
when children are in harms way) and/or b) administrative controlsB 
these could include evaluating the impact of changes in work 
practices, such as limiting the type of work a youth does (i.e., 
not allowing youth under 16 to drive tractors), modification of 
work periods, (such as limiting the amount of time a youth works), 
limiting the exposure of the youth (ensuring equipment in the work 
environment is properly shielded), and the type and amount of 
training and supervision given to the young worker. 


Myers JR, Hendricks K. 2001. Injuries Among Youth on Farms in the 
United States, 1998. NIOSH Publication No. 2001-154.

Castillo DN, Adekoya N, Myers JR. 1999. Fatal Work-Related 
Injuries in the Agricultural Production and Services Sectors Among 
Youth in the United States, 1992-1996. Journal of Agromedicine 

o  Intervention Effectiveness Research In Occupational Health

The purpose of this initiative is to stimulate research that 
evaluates the effectiveness of intervention techniques which have 
been implemented or proposed for reducing or preventing workplace 
injuries and illnesses.  While many workplace interventions have 
been developed and implemented, there has been little research on 
the effectiveness of these activities.  Before work place 
intervention strategies can be applied universally, there is a 
critical need for information on how effective are the currently 
used or planned strategies and approaches.  The results of these 
investigations will contribute significantly to improving worker 
health and safety by identifying intervention strategies that are 
effective.  Because the issue of intervention effectiveness is of 
importance to many membership groups (unions, professional 
associations, etc), industries, and state health departments, 
collaborative research projects between these organizations and 
academic researchers are particularly encouraged. 

Research applications are sought that focus on the systematic 
evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions that address but 
are not limited to any of the following disease or injury areas: 
1) Traumatic Injuries including Violence 2)Allergic and Irritant 
Dermatitis, 3)Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 
4)Fertility and Pregnancy Abnormalities, 5)Hearing Loss, 
6)Infectious Diseases, and 7)Low Back Disorders.

Fully-developed interventions either implemented or ready for 
implementation are of interest, as well as applications for 
comparative analysis of the effectiveness of alternate options 
(e.g., cost effectiveness).  The interventions to be evaluated 
could be defined at any level of complexity, and range from a 
regulatory or voluntary occupational safety or health standard to 
the change of a single, specific work process, control technology, 
training program, or informational campaign.  Evaluations may 
address but are not limited to (1) the practicality and usability 
of specific control strategies, technologies and/or personal 
protective equipment in the elimination or reduction of hazards; 
(2) the identification of critical factors for implementing and 
conducting effective occupational safety and health programs; (3) 
the components of effective occupational safety and health 
programs, including worker participation programs, training or 
other organizational and administrative aspects, as well as 
engineering solutions; and (4) identification and elimination of 
barriers to the implementation of interventions, such as a lack of 
acceptance due to practicality, perception that cost is 
prohibitive, etc.

Examples of potential health, economic, and social outcome 
measures may include but are not limited to, health and safety 
outcomes (e.g., reductions in injury, disability, stress, or 
hazard exposure); economic outcomes (e.g, the effect of the 
intervention on productivity, employee turnover, income, medical, 
and or societal costs); and/or social outcomes (e.g., social roles 
and relationships at work and in the family and other aspects of 
the work-family interface). 


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. National 
Occupational Research Agenda. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of 
Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No.96-115 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.  A Model 
for Research on Training Effectiveness.  Cincinnati, OH: U.S. 
Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No.96-142 


It is the policy of the CDC to ensure that individuals of both 
sexes and the various racial and ethnic groups will be included in 
CDC-supported research projects involving human subjects, whenever 
feasible and appropriate. Racial and ethnic groups are those 
defined in OMB Directive No. 15 and include American Indian or 
Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or 
Latino, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.  Applicants 
shall ensure that women, racial and ethnic minority populations 
are appropriately represented in applications for research 
involving human subjects.  Where clear and compelling rationale 
exist that inclusion is inappropriate or not feasible, this 
situation must be explained as part of the application.  This 
policy does not apply to research studies when the investigator 
cannot control the race, ethnicity, and/or sex of subjects.  
Further guidance to this policy is contained in the Federal 
Register, Vol. 60, No. 179, pages 47947-47951, and dated Friday, 
September 15, 1995.

All investigators proposing research involving human subjects 
should read the "NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and 
Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research," published in the NIH 
Guide for Grants and Contracts on August 2, 2000 
 a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at


It is the policy of NIH that children (i.e., individuals under the 
age of 21) must be included in all human subjects research, 
conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and 
ethical reasons not to include them. This policy applies to all 
initial (Type 1) applications submitted for receipt dates after 
October 1, 1998.  This policy will be followed by NIOSH for this 

All investigators proposing research involving human subjects 
should read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines on the Inclusion of 
Children as Participants in Research Involving Human Subjects" 
that was published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, 
March 6, 1998, and is available at the following URL address:

Investigators also may obtain copies of these policies from the 
program staff listed under INQUIRIES. Program staff may also 
provide additional relevant information concerning the policy.


If the proposed project involves research on human subjects, the 
applicant must comply with the Department of Health and Human 
Services (DHHS) Regulations (Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations 
Part 46) regarding the protection of human research subjects.  All 
awardees of CDC grants and cooperative agreements and their 
performances sites engaged in human subjects research must file an 
assurance of compliance with the regulations and have continuing 
reviews of the research protocol by appropriate institutional 
review boards.

In order to obtain a federal-wide Assurance (FWA) of Protection 
for Human Subjects, the applicant must complete an on-line 
application at the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) 
website or write to the OHRP for an application.  OHRP will verify 
that the signatory official and the Human Subjects Protections 
Administrator have completed the OHRP Assurance Training/Education 
Module before approving the FWA.  Existing Multiple Project 
Assurances (MPAs), Cooperative Project Assurances (CPAs), and 
Single Project Assurances (SPAs) remain in full effect until they 
expire or until December 31, 2003, whichever comes first.

To obtain a FWA contact the OHRP at: 
or write to:

Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)
Department of Health and Human Services
6100 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3B01, MSC 7501
Rockville, Maryland  20892-7507
(Note: For Express or Hand Delivered Mail, Use Zip Code 20852)

Note: In addition to other applicable committees, Indian Health 
Service (IHS) institutional review committees must also review the 
project if any component of IHS will be involved with or will 
support the research.  If any American Indian community is 
involved, its tribal government must also approve the applicable 
portion of that project.


NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject 
participants for all investigators submitting NIH proposals for 
research involving human subjects.  This policy announcement is 
found in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts Announcement dated 
June 5, 2000, at the following website:


If the proposed project involves research on animal subjects, 
compliance with the PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of 
Laboratory Animals by Awardee Institutions is required.  An 
applicant (as well as each subcontractor or cooperating 
institution that has immediate responsibility for animal subjects) 
proposing to use vertebrate animals in CDC-supported activities 
must file (or have on file) the Animal Welfare Assurance with the 
Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) at the National 
Institutes of Health. The applicant must provide in the 
application the assurance of compliance number and evidence of 
review and approval (including the date of the most recent 
approval) by the Institutional Care and Use Committee (IACUC).  
Web page

All applications must be self-contained within specified page 
limitations.  Unless otherwise specified, internet addresses 
(URLs) should not be used to provide information necessary to the 
review because reviewers are under no obligation to view the 
internet sites.  Reviewers are cautioned that their anonymity may 
be compromised when they directly access an internet site.


By regulation (45 CFR 74.36), grantees that are institutions of 
higher education, hospitals, or non-profit organizations are 
required to provide public access to research data through the 
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances (OMB 
Circular A-110).  Data that are (1) first produced in a project 
that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2) 
cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an 
action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) 
may be accessed through FOIA.  It is important for applicants to 
understand the basic scope of this amendment.  For further 
information on this policy refer to page 52 in the PHS 398 grant 
application or access the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts 
Announcement at:

Applicants may wish to place data collected under this RFA in a 
public archive, which can provide protections for the data and 
manage the distribution for an indefinite period of time.  If so, 
the application should include a description of the archiving plan 
in the study design and include information about this in the 
budget justification section of the application. In addition, 
applicants should think about how to structure informed consent 
statements and other human subjects procedures given the potential 
for wider use of data collected under this award.  


Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by November 7, 2001, a 
letter of intent that includes the number and title of the RFA, a 
descriptive title of the proposed research, the name, address, and 
telephone number of the Principal Investigator, and the identities 
of other key personnel and participating institutions.  Although a 
letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and is not used 
in the review of an application, the information that it contains 
is used to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.

The letter of intent is to be submitted to: 

Pervis C. Major, Ph.D.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1095 Willowdale Rd
Morgantown, WV  26505
Telephone:  304-285-5979
Fax:  304-285-6147


The PHS 398 research grant application instructions and forms 
(rev. 5/2001) at 
must be used in applying for these grants. This version of PHS 398 is 
available in an interactive, searchable format. Although 
applicants are strongly encouraged to begin using the 5/2001 
revision of the PHS 398 as soon as possible, the NIOSH will 
continue to accept applications prepared using the 4/1998 revision 
until January 9, 2002. Beginning January 10, 2002, however, the 
NIOSH will return applications that are not submitted on the 
5/2001 version.  For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, 
Telephone 301/710-0267, Email:


The modular grant concept establishes specific modules in which 
direct costs may be requested as well as a maximum level for 
requested budgets. Only limited budgetary information is required 
under this approach.  The just-in-time concept allows applicants 
to submit certain information only when there is a possibility for 
an award. It is anticipated that these changes will reduce the 
administrative burden for the applicants, reviewers and NIH staff. 
 The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001) at is to be 
used in applying for these grants, with modular budget 
instructions provided in Section C of the application 
instructions.  Applicants are permitted, however, to use the 
4/1998 revision of the PHS 398 for scheduled application receipt 
dates until January 9, 2002.  If you are preparing an application 
using the 4/1998 version, please refer to the step-by-step 
instructions for Modular Grants available at  
Additional information about Modular Grants is also available on 
this site.

The RFA label available in the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001) application 
form ( must be 
affixed to the bottom of the face page of the application.  Type 
the RFA number on the label.  Failure to use this label could 
result in delayed processing of the application such that it may 
not reach the review committee in time for review.  In addition, 
the RFA title and number must be typed on line 2 of the face page 
of the application form and the YES box must be marked.  

Submit a signed original of the application and three exact 
photocopies, including the checklist, in one package to:

BETHESDA, MD  20892-7710
BETHESDA, MD  20817 (for express/courier service)

At the time of submission, two additional copies of the 
application must also be sent to:

Pervis C. Major, Ph.D.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1095 Willowdale Rd
Morgantown, WV  26505
Telephone:  304-285-5979
Fax:  304-285-6147

Applications must be received by December 27, 2001.  If an 
application is received after that date, it will be returned to 
the applicant without review.  CSR and NIOSH will not accept any 
application in response to this RFA that is essentially the same 
as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant 
withdraws the pending application.  CSR and NIOSH will not accept 
any application that is essentially the same as one already 
reviewed.  This does not preclude the submission of a substantial 
revision of an application already reviewed, but such an 
application must follow the guidance in the PHS Form 398 
application instructions for the preparation of revised 
applications, including an Introduction addressing the previous 


Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by 
CSR and responsiveness by NIOSH.  Applications determined to be 
incomplete or unresponsive to this RFA will be returned to the 
applicant without further consideration.  Applications that are 
complete and responsive to the RFA will be reviewed for technical 
merit by a scientific review group convened by NIOSH.

All applications will be judged on the basis of the scientific 
merit of the proposed project and the documented ability of the 
investigators to meet the research objectives of the RFA.  As part 
of the scientific merit review, all applications will receive a 
written critique and undergo a process in which only those 
applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, 
generally the top half of applications under review, will be 
discussed and assigned a priority score.

The criteria that NIOSH will use to review applications for 
scientific merit and for meeting program objectives are provided 

Scientific Review Criteria

o  Significance - Does this study address an important problem 
related to the topical research issues outlined in this 
announcement?  If the aims of the application are achieved, how 
will scientific knowledge be advanced?  What will be the effect of 
these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field?

o  Approach - Are the conceptual framework, design (including 
composition of study population), methods, and analyses adequately 
developed, well-integrated and appropriate to the aims of the 
project?  Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas 
and consider alternative tactics?

o  Innovation - Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches 
or methods?  Are the aims original and innovative? Does the 
project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies 
or technologies?

o  Investigator - Is the investigator appropriately trained and 
well-suited to carry out this work?  Is the work proposed 
appropriate to the experience level of the principal investigator 
and other researchers, if any?

o  Environment - Does the scientific environment in which the work 
will be done contribute to the probability of success?  Do the 
proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the 
scientific environment or employ useful collaborative 
arrangements?  Is there documentation of cooperation from 
industry, unions, communities, or other participants in the 
project, where applicable?  Is there evidence of institutional 
support and availability of resources necessary to perform the 

o Adequacy of plans to include both genders, minorities and their 
subgroups, and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of 
the research.  Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects 
will also be evaluated.  

o The adequacy of the proposed protection of humans, animals, or 
the environment, to the extent that they may be adversely affected 
by the project proposed in the application.  

o Availability of special opportunities for furthering research 
programs through the use of unusual talent resources, populations, 
or environmental conditions in other countries which are not 
readily available in the United States or which provide 
augmentation of existing U.S. resources.  

Programmatic Review Criteria

o  Magnitude of the problem in terms of numbers of workers 

o  Severity of the disease or injury in the worker population.

o  Likelihood of developing applied technical knowledge for the 
prevention of occupational safety and health hazards on a national 
or regional basis.


Letter of Intent Receipt Date:  November 7, 2001
Application Receipt Date:       December 27, 2001
Anticipated Award Date:         June 1, 2002


Applications will be considered for award based upon (a) 
scientific merit, (b) program importance, (c) program balance of 
research areas, and (d) availability of funds.  


Inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged.  The opportunity to 
clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is 
welcome.  This RFA and other CDC/NIOSH Announcements can be found 
on the CDC HomePage ( under the "Funding" section (see 
Grants and Cooperative Agreements scroll down to Occupational 
Safety and Health).  This RFA can also be found on the NIOSH 
HomePage ( under "Extramural Programs, Current 
Funding Opportunities.

Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:

Adele M. Childress, Ph.D. M.S.P.H.
Office of Extramural Programs
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Road, N.E.
Building 1, Room 3053, MS D-30
Atlanta, GA  30333
Telephone:  404/639-1493
FAX:  404/639-0035

Direct inquiries regarding grants business management matters to:

Joanne Wojcik
Grants Management Branch
Procurement and Grants Office
CDC Announcement Number CDC 02014
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2920 Brandywine Road, Suite 3000
Atlanta, GA  30341-4146
Telephone:  770/488-2717
FAX:  770/488-2777


The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number is: 93.262 for 
the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 
 This program is authorized under the Public Health Service Act, 
as amended, Section 301(a) [42 U.S.C. 241(a)], and the 
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Section 20(a) [29 
U.S.C. 669(a)].  The applicable program regulation is 42 CFR Part 52. 


Applicants should be aware of restrictions on the use of Health 
and Human Services (DHHS) funds for lobbying of Federal or State 
legislative bodies.  Under the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Section 
1352, recipients (and their subtier contractors) are prohibited 
from using appropriated Federal funds (other than profits from a 
Federal contract) for lobbying congress or any Federal agency in 
connection with the award of a particular contract, grant, 
cooperative agreement, or loan.  This includes grants/cooperative 
agreements that, in whole or in part, involve conferences for 
which Federal funds cannot be used directly or indirectly to 
encourage participants to lobby or to instruct participants on how 
to lobby.

In addition, no part of the Center for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) appropriated funds shall be used, other than for 
normal and recognized executive-legislative relationships, for 
publicity or propaganda purposes, for the preparation, 
distribution, or use of any kit, pamphlet, booklet, publication, 
radio, television, or video presentation designed to support or 
defeat legislation pending before the Congress or any State or 
local legislature, except in presentation to the Congress or any 
State or local legislature itself.  No part of the appropriated 
funds shall be used to pay the salary or expenses of any grant or 
contract recipient, or agent acting for such recipient, related to 
any activity designed to influence legislation or appropriations 
pending before the Congress or any State or local legislature.

Any activity designed to influence action in regard to a 
particular piece of pending legislation would be considered 
"lobbying."  That is lobbying for or against pending legislation, 
as well as indirect or "grass roots" lobbying efforts by award 
recipients that are directed at inducing members of the public to 
contact their elected representatives at the Federal or State 
levels to urge support of, or opposition to, pending legislative 
proposals is prohibited.  As a matter of policy, CDC extends the 
prohibitions to lobbying with respect to local legislation and 
local legislative bodies.

The provisions are not intended to prohibit all interaction with 
the legislative branch, or to prohibit educational efforts 
pertaining to public health.  Clearly there are circumstances when 
it is advisable and permissible to provide information to the 
legislative branch in order to foster implementation of prevention 
strategies to promote public health.  However, it would not be 
permissible to influence, directly or indirectly, a specific piece 
of pending legislation.

It remains permissible to use CDC funds to engage in activity to 
enhance prevention; collect and analyze data; publish and 
disseminate results of research and surveillance data; implement 
prevention strategies; conduct community outreach services; 
provide leadership and training; and foster safe and healthful 

Recipients of CDC grants and cooperative agreements need to be 
careful to prevent CDC funds from being used to influence or 
promote pending legislation.  With respect to conferences, public 
events, publication, and "grassroots" activities that relate to 
specific legislation, recipients of CDC funds should give 
attention to isolating and separating the appropriate use of CDC 
funds from non-CDC funds.  CDC also cautions recipients of CDC 
funds to be careful not to give the appearance that CDC funds are 
being used to carry out activities in a manner that is prohibited 
under Federal law.


CDC strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a 
smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco 
products, and Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, 
prohibits smoking in certain facilities that receive Federal funds 
in which education, library, day care, health care, and early 
childhood development services are provided to children.


It is a national policy to place a fair share of purchases with 
small, minority and women-owned business firms. The Department of 
Health and Human Services is strongly committed to the objective 
of this policy and encourages all recipients of its grants and 
cooperative agreements to take affirmative steps to ensure such 
fairness. In particular, recipients should:

1. Place small, minority, women-owned business firms on bidders 
mailing lists.

2. Solicit these firms whenever they are potential sources of 
supplies, equipment, construction, or services.

3. Where feasible, divide total requirements into smaller needs, 
and set delivery schedules that will encourage participation by 
these firms.

4. Use the assistance of the Minority Business Development Agency 
of the Department of Commerce, the Office of Small and 
Disadvantaged Business Utilization, DHHS, and similar state and 
local offices.


The signature of the institution official on the face page of the 
application submitted under this Program Announcement is 
certifying compliance with the Department of Health and Human 
Services (DHHS) regulations in Title 42 Part 50, Subpart A, 
entitled "Responsibility of PHS Awardee and Applicant Institutions 
for Dealing with and Reporting Possible Misconduct in Science."
The regulation places several requirements on institutions 
receiving or applying for funds under the PHS Act that are 
monitored by the DHHS Office of Research Integrity's (ORI) 
Assurance Program.

For examples:

Section 50.103(a) of the regulation states: "Each institution that 
applies for or receives assistance under the Act for any project 
or program which involves the conduct of biomedical or behavioral 
research must have an assurance satisfactory to the Secretary 
(DHHS) that the applicant: (1) Has established an administrative 
process, that meets the requirements of this subpart, for 
reviewing, investigating, and reporting allegations of misconduct 
in science in connection with PHS-sponsored biomedical and 
behavioral research conducted at the applicant institution or 
sponsored by the applicant; and (2) Will comply with its own 
administrative process and the requirements of this Subpart."

Section 50.103(b) of the regulation states that: "an applicant or 
recipient institution shall make an annual submission to the [ORI] 
as follows: (1) The institution's assurance shall be submitted to 
the [ORI], on a form prescribed by the Secretary,...and updated 
annually thereafter...(2) An institution shall submit, along with 
its annual assurance, such aggregate information on allegations, 
inquiries, and investigations as the Secretary may prescribe."

Return to Volume Index

Return to NIH Guide Main Index

Office of Extramural Research (OER) - Home Page Office of Extramural
Research (OER)
  National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Home Page National Institutes of Health (NIH)
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Home Page Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) - Government Made Easy

Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files.