CENTER FOR COLLABORATIVE GENETIC STUDIES ON MENTAL DISORDERS
RELEASE DATE: March 28, 2002
RFA: MH-03-003
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
(http://www.nimh.nih.gov)
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING: May 15, 2002
LETTER OF INTENT RECEIPT DATE: September 16, 2002
APPLICATION RECEIPT DATE: October 16, 2002
THIS RFA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
o Purpose of this RFA
o Research Objectives
o Mechanism of Support
o Funds Available
o Eligible Institutions
o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators
o Special Requirements
o Where to Send Inquiries
o Letter of Intent
o Submitting an Application
o Peer Review Process
o Review Criteria
o Receipt and Review Schedule
o Award Criteria
o Required Federal Citations
PURPOSE OF THIS RFA
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) invites applications for
support of a Center for Collaborative Genetic Studies on Mental Disorders,
which will contribute to the improvement and enrichment of research resources
to be distributed for genetic studies of mental disorders under the rubric of
the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative (http://zork.wustl.edu/nimh/NIMH
_initiative/NIMH_initiative_link.html). The Center, which will function
as a integrated team of investigators with expertise in molecular biology,
statistical genetics, bioinformatics and psychiatric genetics within a single
institution or across institutions, will facilitate and accelerate free and
open sharing among researchers in the scientific community by providing on a
fee-for-service basis: DNA, cell lines, electronic data files, and services
for the genetic analysis of mental disorders.
The goal of this initiative will be to enrich and distribute clinical
information, genotypic data, DNA samples, and cell lines from large numbers
of unrelated affected individuals and from pedigrees of affected individuals
and their relatives. Such research resources will provide adequate
statistical power for discovering genes that produce vulnerability to mental
disorders. Data and biomaterials collected and produced by the Center will
augment pre-existing resources in the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative for
genetic analyses by the wider scientific community.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Background
The free and open sharing of genetic material and clinical data among
researchers has been essential in accelerating discoveries in human genetics.
A recent national survey of life scientists found that over 70% of
geneticists felt that lack of data sharing detracted from the level of
communication in science and slowed the rate of progress in their field; the
major conclusion was that the impact of data withholding in academic genetics
is widespread and adversely affects essential scientific activities such as
the ability to confirm published results. For mental disorders and other
genetically complex diseases in which gene effects are modest, sharing is
often absolutely necessary to achieve sample sizes that have adequate
statistical power for gene mapping. Other specific scientific advantages of
sharing research resources include facilitating the rapid replication of new
findings, stimulating multidisciplinary research among clinical and basic
scientists, providing needed clinical resources to promising young
investigators, avoiding duplicative data collection efforts and laboratory
work, and facilitating the rapid application of state-of-the-art genomic
technologies and analytic methods to clinical data sets. These advantages
are expected to facilitate our understanding of disease pathophysiology, and
accelerate the development of new therapeutic compounds and diagnostic tests.
In the late 1980s, NIMH launched a Human Genetics Initiative
(http://zork.wustl.edu/nimh/NIMH_initiative/NIMH_initiative_link.html)
to study the genetic basis of vulnerability to schizophrenia, Alzheimer's
disease, and bipolar disorder. The main goal of this effort was to accelerate
gene discovery through the sharing of electronic databases of clinical
information, DNA samples, and cell lines as a national resource for the
scientific community. In 1997, a workgroup of the National Advisory Mental
Health Council reviewed the NIMH genetics research portfolio and recommended
that NIMH continue to fund large-scale data collection efforts and to
maintain a repository of DNA and clinical data for sharing with the scientific
community (see the report summary at http://www.nimh.nih.gov/research/
genetics.htm). The Workgroup also discussed future expansion of these
efforts to include other mental disorders. At a joint meeting in September
2000, the National Advisory Councils of the NIMH and the National Institute
of Neurological Disorders and Stroke strongly recommended that data sharing
for the genetic analysis of complex diseases supported by these Institutes
continue to be strongly encouraged.
In order to enhance and enrich research resources in the NIMH Human Genetics
Initiative for free and open sharing with the scientific community, the NIMH
plans to fund one Center under this RFA. An example of the benefits of data
sharing expected from Center activities is the recent successful effort to
promote collaboration across investigators involved in the collection of
families with Crohn disease. Whereas individual data sets reporting linkage
to three different chromosomes did not have sufficient power alone to yield
conclusive evidence, pooling the data from investigators in 13 countries
provided unequivocal replication of linkage for Crohn disease to a marker on
chromosome 16.
The long-term objective of data sharing and research resource enrichment
under this RFA is to accelerate gene discovery in mental disorders that
include Alzheimer's disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism
and related spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder and other related mood
disorders, recurrent early-onset depression, eating disorders, obsessive-
compulsive disorder and other anxiety disorders, panic disorder,
schizophrenia, and other psychotic disorders.
Research Objectives
The NIMH will utilize the U24 Resource-Related Research Projects –
Cooperative Agreements funding mechanism to establish one Center for
Collaborative Genetic Studies on Mental Disorders to serve as a national and
international resource to the scientific community. The Center funded under
this RFA will be directed by a Principal Investigator (PI) and will receive
guidance from NIMH program staff to assist with identification and
implementation of appropriate strategies and priorities. It is expected that
the Center will be comprised of an integrated team of investigators (within a
single institution or across institutions) with expertise in molecular
biology, statistical genetics, bioinformatics and psychiatric genetics.
Regardless of how many institutions are involved, it is expected that the
efforts of the Center will be strategically and functionally coordinated such
that the Center will function as a single, national resource. It is expected
that the principal investigator and the proposed collaborative team have
direct experience in providing to the scientific community research resources
and services for genetic studies. Specific areas of scientific expertise
required by the Center include the following:
o Molecular biology, with a primary focus on the Epstein-Barr virus
transformation of lymphocytes from fresh blood samples received from national
and international sites to create contaminant-free cell lines, and the
extraction of high-quality DNA from these cell lines.
o Bioinformatics, with a primary focus on the receipt and production of
pedigree, clinical (including information obtained from structured
psychiatric interviews), genotypic and other genetic data for the
establishment of documented web-based data files for the genetic analysis of
mental disorders. This work will also encompass the development and
application of novel technological or computational methods for the
production and analysis of comprehensive genomic data sets.
o Statistical genetics of complex diseases, with a primary focus on the
development of algorithms and well-documented software for meta-analytic
genetic studies and clustering and other classification techniques in genetic
analysis. This work will also encompass the development of novel statistical
approaches by which linkage findings from multiple genomic scans may be
jointly analyzed to fine map disease susceptibility loci.
o Analysis of psychiatric family data, with a primary focus on the
development of analytic methods by which psychiatric diagnostic information
can be analyzed to identify biologically meaningful phenotypes and clinical
subtypes.
Coordination of the Center's activities will be accomplished through close
collaboration between the Center scientific staff, NIMH program staff, and a
scientific steering committee (Genetics Steering Committee (GSC)). A
Genetics Advisory Panel (GAP), composed of experts not affiliated with the
Centers or the GSC, also will be formed to provide scientific oversight of
the Center and to address long-term strategic issues and policies related to
the gene discovery and characterization of the genetic basis of mental
disorders. GSC, GAP, PI, and NIMH responsibilities are described under
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS.
Specific functions and services to be performed by the Center for the
scientific community include:
o Resolution of the discrepancies in linkage findings obtained in multiple
data sets for mental disorders.
o Exploration of explanations for discrepancies - either at the level of the
phenotype definition, characterization of DNA markers, or statistical methods
- which would provide a stronger base for a priori testing of particular
candidate regions in future genetic studies.
o Development of analytic approaches for the pooling of data on therapeutic
drug response, in order to accelerate gene discovery.
o Development of novel statistical approaches by which linkage findings from
multiple genomic scans may be jointly analyzed to fine map disease
susceptibility loci.
o Receipt from national and international research projects supported under
the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative of blood samples for cell line
immortalization and of clinical and genetic data files. This includes blood
samples drawn from unrelated affected individuals in NIMH-supported large-
scale clinical trials.
o Creation and maintenance of contaminant-free lymphoblastoid cell lines,
immortalized from fresh whole blood samples with a success rate of greater
than 98% (for samples shipped from both domestic and foreign sites), and
extraction of high-quality DNA.
o Verification of sample identity, gender, and pedigree relationships on
blood samples received from research projects supported under the NIMH Human
Genetics Initiative.
o Distribution of datafiles and biomaterials (cell lines and DNA) to the
scientific community, according to the unique needs of investigators.
o Consultation on the experimental design of pharmacogenomic and other
genetic studies, and development of analytic methods by which clinical and
genotypic data may be pooled for meta-analytic genetic studies of mental
disorders.
o Provision of algorithms and well-documented software for meta-analytic
studies of genotypic data, and consultation on applying clustering and other
classification techniques in genetic analysis.
o Consultation on the analysis of psychiatric family study data obtained
from diagnostic interviews.
o Establishment and distribution of pedigree datasets, in which non-
Mendelian inheritances and other errors determined from genome scans and
other genetic analyses are resolved.
o Receipt, production and distribution of databases of genotypic information
received from multiple laboratories, in which genotyping inconsistencies are
reconciled.
o Provision of novel technological or computational methods for the
production and analysis of comprehensive genomic data sets.
These services and research resources will be provided to the scientific
community by the Center on a fee-for-service basis. Fees charged will
recover costs and service delivery costs. Applications in response to this
RFA should include detailed plans for the advisory, research and development,
and other fee-for-service functions of the Center.
MECHANISM OF SUPPORT
This RFA will use the NIH Resource-Related Research Projects – Cooperative
Agreements award mechanism (U24). As an applicant, you will be solely
responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project.
This RFA is a one-time solicitation. The earliest anticipated award date is
July 1, 2003.
The NIH U24 is a cooperative agreement award mechanism in which the Principal
Investigator retains the primary responsibility and dominant role for
planning, directing, and executing the proposed project, with NIH staff being
substantially involved as a partner with the Principal Investigator, as
described under the section "Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of
Award."
FUNDS AVAILABLE
The NIMH intends to commit approximately $4.7 million in FY 2003 to fund one
new cooperative agreement in response to this RFA. An applicant may request
a project period of up to 5 years. Although the financial plans of the NIMH
provide support for this program, awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent
upon the availability of funds and the receipt of a sufficiently meritorious
application. At this time, it is not known if this RFA will be reissued.
ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS
You may submit an application if your institution has any of the following
characteristics:
o For-profit or non-profit organizations
o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals,
and laboratories
o Units of State and local governments
o Eligible agencies of the Federal government
o Domestic
INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO BECOME PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS
Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry
out the proposed research is invited to work with their institution to
develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial
and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always
encouraged to apply for NIH programs.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
I. Definitions
ARBITRATION PANEL: A panel that would be formed to arbitrate scientific or
programmatic disagreement, should any arise, between award recipients and the
NIMH within the scope of the award.
AWARDEE: The institution to which a cooperative agreement is awarded.
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT: An assistance mechanism in which there is anticipated
substantial NIMH programmatic involvement with the recipient organization
during the performance of the planned activity.
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI): The researcher who assembles the project,
submits an application in response to this RFA, and assumes responsibility
for the overall performance of the project. The PI will coordinate project
activities scientifically and administratively.
NIH PROGRAM DIRECTOR: A scientist of the NIMH program staff who has
substantial scientific/programming involvement.
GENETICS STEERING COMMITTEE (GSC): The main governing board of the Center
funded under this RFA, through which the NIMH formally interacts with the
Center. Membership includes the NIMH Program Director, the PI, and two
extramural scientists with relevant expertise who are not affiliated with the
funded project.
GENETICS ADVISORY PANEL (GAP): A panel of extramural researchers who provide
scientific oversight of the Center. GAP evaluates the goals and objectives
of the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative, the progress of the Center in relation
to the ongoing needs of the scientific community in genetic studies of mental
disorders, and the inclusion of state-of-the-art genomic tools and
technologies in Center activities.
II. Pre-Application Meeting
Prospective applicants are invited to attend a pre-application meeting on May
15, 2002, at the NIMH in Rockville, MD. This meeting will provide the
opportunity for NIH staff to clarify any requirements of the RFA. At the
pre-application meeting, NIH staff will explain the purpose of this RFA,
provide detailed instructions about the application process, and answer
questions. Interested scientists should contact the NIMH program staff
contact listed under WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES to obtain further information.
Potential applicant institutions are urged to send a representative to this
meeting. Anyone who cannot attend this meeting will be provided with any
distributed materials and with a summary of the discussion within two weeks
of the meeting.
III. Program Income
Fees charged by the Center will constitute Program Income. Program Income is
gross income earned by the awardee that is directly generated by a supported
activity or earned as a result of the award (see 45 CFR 74.2 and 74.24 for
additional information). An estimate of the amount and source of Program
Income that will be generated as a result of the award must be included on
the Checklist Page of all competing and non-competing continuation
applications. Net program income earned during a budget period must be
reported on the annual Financial Status Report (FSR) (except for Program
Income earned as a result of inventions, to which special rules apply).
Costs incident to the generation of Program Income may be deducted from gross
income to determine Program Income to be reported on the FSR, provided that
these costs have not been charged to the award.
Program Income earned during the project period shall be retained by the
award recipient and is to be deducted from the total project or program
allowable costs in determining the net allowable costs on which the federal
share of costs is based. The NIMH may offset a future award by this amount
or reauthorize it for expenditure on a future award.
IV. Quarterly Meetings
The GSC will meet quarterly at the NIMH. Applications in response to this
RFA should include a request for funds to cover the expense of attending
these meetings in Rockville, MD.
V. Data Sharing
The sharing of biomaterials, data, and software in a timely manner has been
an essential element in the rapid progress that has been made in the genetic
analysis of human diseases. NIH policy requires that investigators make
unique research resources produced with DHHS funding available for research
purposes to qualified individuals within the scientific community (NIH Grants
Policy Statement - March 2001, Part II Subpart A, Availability of Research
Results: Publications, Intellectual Property Rights, and Sharing Biomedical
Research Resources, page 120-122, "Sharing Biomedical Research Resources,"
available at
https://grants.nih.gov/archive/grants/policy/nihgps_2001/nihgps_2001.pdf); see also
PHS policy relating to the distribution of unique research resources produced
with PHS funding at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not96-
184.html). Principles and guidelines for sharing biomedical research
resources also can be found in online NIH reports at
http://www.nih.gov/science/models/sharing.html and
http://www.nih.gov/news/researchtools/index.htm. A draft NIH Statement on
sharing research data that extends these policies has recently been published
(https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-035.html.
Providing access to data collected in human genetic studies for qualified
investigators in the wider scientific community has been a guiding principle
of the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative (http://zork.wustl.edu/nimh/
NIMH_initiative/NIMH_initiative_link.html).
To address the joint interests of the government in the availability of, and
access to, the results of publicly funded research and in the opportunity for
economic development based on these results, the NIMH requires applicants who
respond to this RFA to develop and propose detailed plans for sharing and
disseminating the data and biomaterials produced and received through the
Center. It is expected that the information to be shared includes clinical,
diagnostic, and pedigree structure information, in addition to cell lines and
DNA. Policies and procedures in the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative specify
that DNA, cell lines, and datafiles be widely accessible by investigators in
the scientific community. The NIMH Human Genetics Initiative employs
procedures by which data and biomaterials are widely disseminated to
qualified investigators in the scientific community
(http://zork.wustl.edu/nimh/NIMH_initiative/NIMH%20Human%20Genetics%20
Initiative%20Access%20Information.htm). It is preferable that the
procedures for sharing data and biomaterials are comparable to those
currently employed in the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative.
It is expected that the investigator's data sharing plan will specify the
following elements: (1) the production of comprehensive and verified
databases that contain clinical, diagnostic, pedigree structure, and
genotypic information collected and produced by the Center; (2) the
establishment of cell lines, from which DNA will be extracted and stored, for
all subjects studied from whom blood samples have been received by the
Center; (3) mechanisms by which all databases and biomaterials (DNA samples,
cell lines) are widely distributed to qualified investigators in the
scientific community; (4) a protocol and criteria for free and open sharing
of these data and biomaterials; and (5) an assurance that data and
biomaterials are shared in a manner comparable to pre-existing protocols and
procedures for sharing such research resources in the NIMH Human Genetics
Initiative.
The Scientific Review Group will comment on the proposed plan for sharing and
data access. The plan will be considered as an important part of the
methodology for carrying out the research and, as such, the adequacy of the
plan will be considered by NIMH staff in determining whether the grant shall
be awarded. The sharing plan as approved, after negotiation with the
applicant when necessary, will be a condition of the award.
VI. Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award
The following special Terms and Conditions will be incorporated into the
cooperative agreement award statement and are in addition to, and not in lieu
of, otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS grant
administration regulations at 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92 (Part 92 is applicable
when State and local Governments are eligible to apply), and other HHS and
NIH grant administration policies:
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the
U24, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in
which substantial NIH scientific and/or programmatic involvement with the
awardees is anticipated during performance of the activities. Under the
cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and/or stimulate the
recipient's activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with
the award recipients in a partnership role. The NIH purpose is not to assume
direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities.
Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility
resides with the awardee for the project as a whole, although specific tasks
and activities will be shared among the awardee, GSC, and NIMH program staff.
1. Awardee Rights and Responsibilities
The awardee, as Center PI, will coordinate project activities scientifically
and administratively at the awardee institution, and will have primary
responsibility for performing all scientific and fee-for-service activities.
The Center PI must agree to participate with NIMH program staff and GSC in
coordinating the activities of the Center, with the result that all
investigators included in the application function as a single functioning
Center. The PI agrees to accept the close coordination, cooperation, and
participation of the Program Director, GSC, and GAP in those aspects of
scientific and technical management of the project as described below.
Specifically, the PI will:
o Determine experimental approaches, design protocols, oversee the provision
of services and research resources to the scientific community, and work
cooperatively to set project milestones, in consultation with NIMH program
staff, GSC, and GAP.
o Distribute biomaterials and datafiles for researchers granted access by
the NIMH to research resources in the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative. Access
determinations will be made by the NIMH with input as required from GAP.
o Maintain a log of Center usage that records the products and services
provided and the fees charged.
o Prior to each non-competing renewal, submit progress reports in a standard
format, as agreed upon by GSC. The progress report will describe the
activities and accomplishments of the Center for the preceding award period,
and the goals to be accomplished during the renewal period. The progress
report will include the log of Center usage. The contents of the progress
report will be used by NIMH program staff, along with other information, to
determine the amount of funding the Center will receive for the renewal
period.
o Accept and implement the common guidelines and procedures approved by GSC
and GAP.
o Attend and participate in GSC meetings (budget requests should include
travel funds for the PI and other critical staff to attend GSC meetings at
the NIMH in Rockville, MD, on a quarterly basis). The awardee will have one
vote on GSC and will accept any modification, deletion, or addition of Center
activities approved by GSC.
2. NIMH Program Staff Responsibilities
The NIMH Program Director will have substantial scientific/ programmatic
involvement during the conduct of this activity through technical assistance,
advice, and coordination. This includes functioning as a peer with the PIs,
facilitating the partnership relationship between the NIMH and the Center,
helping to maintain the overall scientific balance in the program
commensurate with new research and emerging research opportunities, and
ensuring that the activities of the Center are consistent with the scientific
mission of the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative
(http://zork.wustl.edu/nimh/NIMH_initiative/NIMH%20Human%20Genetics%20
Initiative%20Mission.htm). The role of the NIMH will be to facilitate
and not to direct activities. Access to research resources maintained in the
NIMH Human Genetics Initiative will be determined by NIMH staff, with input
as required from GAP. The NIMH Program Director shall participate as a
member of GSC and will have one vote. Specifically, the NIMH Program
Director will:
o Provide relevant scientific expertise and overall knowledge.
o Recruit and select the members of GSC, who will each serve a three-year
term. The Program Director will also have the responsibility of replacing
GAP or GSC members that choose to leave. The Program Director may, but is
not required to, consult with Center PIs, GSC members, GAP members, or other
outside advisors when recruiting GSC and GAP members.
o Attend GSC meetings as one voting member and assist in developing
operating guidelines, quality control procedures, and consistent policies for
dealing with recurrent situations that require coordinated action. The
Program Director must be informed of all major interactions of members of
GSC. The Program Director will be responsible for preparing within 30 days a
concise summary of each GSC meeting.
o Participate with other GSC members in the group process of setting
research priorities and milestones, deciding optimal research approaches and
protocol designs, and contributing to the adjustment of research protocols or
approaches as warranted. The Program Director will assist and facilitate the
group process and not direct it.
o Serve as administrative liaison to GAP, attending GAP meetings as a non-
voting member, to help coordinate Center activities with the development of
evolving tools and technologies in genomic and genetic science. The Program
Director will also coordinate Center activities with the scientific mission
and evolving goals of the Human Genetics Initiative, with input as required
from GAP. The Program Director will also coordinate Center activities with
other US and international efforts that focus on sharing research resources
for genetic analyses of complex diseases.
o Appoint the GSC and GAP Chairs, based on recommendations from GSC and GAP
members.
o Serve as scientific liaison between the Center and other NIH staff.
o Assist in promoting and encouraging the sharing of unique research
resources for genetic studies of mental disorders by the scientific community
at large.
o Develop timetables for the timely, open, and free sharing of research
resources received and produced by the Center to the scientific community.
o Coordinate Center activities to ensure the efficient long-term storage of
research resources.
o Retain the option to recommend re-allocating NIMH support provided to the
Center, as scientific goals evolve.
o Determine the amount of support that will be awarded to the Center as a
non-competing renewal. The progress report received from each Center, along
with other information, will be used to make this determination. The
criteria used for this decision will include, but not be limited to, Center
production, customer satisfaction, and successful performance of the Center
as a member of the consortium.
3. Collaborative Responsibilities - Genetics Steering Committee (GSC)
All collaborative activities of the awardee and NIMH staff will occur through
the activities of GSC, which will serve as the governing board of the Center.
The NIMH will formally interact and collaborate with the Center through GSC,
which will include the PI, the NIMH Program Director, and two researchers
(advisors) with relevant scientific expertise who are not affiliated with the
Center. These advisors will be appointed by the NIMH Program Director. One
of the two advisors will be appointed by the Program Director to be GSC's
chair, after consideration of recommendations made by GSC. After appointment
by the Program Director, the GSC Chair will be responsible for developing
meeting agendas and chairing meetings. GSC will meet quarterly. Additional
GSC members may be added by action of GSC or GAP. Other NIH staff may attend
GSC meetings, when their expertise is required for specific discussions. The
Program Director, PI, and each advisor will have one vote each. In cases
where members do not agree, any member may ask the chairperson to solicit a
vote. In order for a decision or course of action to be finalized by GSC, a
majority of the possible votes must be cast in favor of the decision or
course of action.
The GSC will coordinate the activities of the Center and the distribution of
data, biomaterials, and services to the wider scientific community. GSC will
discuss scientific progress, make recommendations regarding the enhancement
of research resources and facilitation of free and open sharing. GAP
recommendations will be addressed by GSC. The awardee will be required to
accept and implement the common protocol and procedures approved by GSC.
4. Scientific Oversight - Genetics Advisory Panel (GAP)
The GAP will meet at least once each year and will oversee Center activities
to assure that the needs of the broader scientific community for research
resources necessary for the genetic analysis of mental disorders are being
met. GAP will provide oversight of the Center, and scientific advice to GSC
and NIMH. GAP members will provide scientific and operational oversight
concerning both long-term developments and distribution activities at the
Center. GAP also will consult on the incorporation of emerging genomic and
genetic tools and technologies into Center activities.
The GAP will consist of about 10 scientists (advisors) who are not affiliated
with the Center, and who are not members of any advisory committee of the
Center. GAP members will be appointed by the NIMH Program Director and will
be selected for their broad expertise in relevant topics such as molecular
biology, molecular genetics, genomics, pharmacogenomics, statistical
genetics, bioinformatics and psychiatric genetics. The NIMH will select one
member to be GAP's chair, after considering GAP recommendations. Additional
GAP members may be added by an action of GAP. The NIMH Program Director will
attend GAP meetings as a non-voting member and will act as a representative
of GSC. Other NIH staff and GSC members may attend GAP meetings, when their
expertise is required for specific discussions. GAP members will not vote on
GSC but may be invited to attend GSC meetings if attendance would
significantly facilitate GSC business.
Periodically, at intervals determined by GSC, a formal request for advice on
specific subjects will be submitted to GAP. The GAP will convene to consider
and formulate opinions on the questions submitted to it. NIMH program staff
will consider GAP opinions with regard to overall Center functioning and when
making determinations for renewal funding.
5. Arbitration
Any disagreement that may arise on scientific/programmatic matters (within
the scope of the award), between award recipients and the NIMH may be brought
to arbitration. An arbitration panel will be composed of three members – one
chosen by GSC (with NIMH not voting) or by the awardee in the event of an
individual disagreement, a second member selected by the NIMH, and the third
member with expertise in the relevant area who is selected by the two prior
selected members. This special arbitration procedure in no way affects the
awardee's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in
accordance with the PHS regulations at 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS
regulation at 45 CFR Part 16.
6. Milestones and Evaluations
Applicants should define yearly milestones in their applications, and the
selected awardee will have the opportunity to modify these milestones at the
time of award. The awardee's milestones will be reviewed by GSC and GAP. It
is expected that the milestones should be adjusted annually at the award
anniversary dates, both to incorporate a group's scientific accomplishments
and progress in the field in general, as well as to reflect GSC and GAP
recommendations. Following the evaluation of milestones, NIMH program staff
may recommend augmenting any activity or reducing or withholding funds for an
activity that substantially fails to meet its milestones or to remain state-
of-the-art. Augmentation of funds must be in the scope of work of the
Center's activities and subject to approval by the NIMH and the National
Advisory Mental Health Council.
WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES
We encourage inquiries concerning this RFA and welcome the opportunity to
answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into three
areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management
issues:
o Direct questions about scientific/research issues to:
Steven O. Moldin, Ph.D.
Genetics Research Branch
Division of Neuroscience and Basic Behavioral Science
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 7189, MSC 9643
Bethesda, MD 20892-9643
Telephone: (301) 443-2037
FAX: (301) 443-9890
Email: smoldin@mail.nih.gov
o Direct questions about peer review issues to:
Camilla Day, Ph.D.
Chief, Genetic Sciences IRG
Center for Scientific Review
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2212, MSC 7890
Bethesda, MD 20892-7890
Telephone: (301) 435-1037
FAX: (301) 480-2067
Email: dayc@csr.nih.gov
o Direct questions about financial or grants management matters to:
Carol J. Robinson
Grants Management Branch
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6118, MSC 9605
Bethesda, MD 20892-9605
Telephone: (301) 443-3858
FAX: (301) 443-6885
Email: crobinso@mail.nih.gov
LETTER OF INTENT
Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes
the following information:
o Descriptive title of the proposed research
o Name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator
o Names of other key personnel
o Participating institutions
o Number and title of this RFA
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not
enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it
contains allows NIMH staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan
the review.
The letter of intent is to be sent by the date listed at the beginning of
this document. The letter of intent should be sent to:
Steven O. Moldin, Ph.D.
Genetics Research Branch
Division of Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral Science
National Institute of Mental Health
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 7189, MSC 9643
Bethesda, MD 20892-9643
Telephone: (301) 443-2037
FAX: (301) 443-9890
Email: smoldin@mail.nih.gov
SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION
Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant application
instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). The PHS 398 is available at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in an interactive
format. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone (301) 710-0267,
Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov.
USING THE RFA LABEL: The RFA label available in the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001)
application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the
application. Type the RFA number on the label. Failure to use this label
could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not
reach the review committee in time for review. In addition, the RFA title
and number must be typed on line 2 of the face page of the application form
and the YES box must be marked. The RFA label is also available at:
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/label-bk.pdf.
SENDING AN APPLICATION TO NIH: Submit a signed, typewritten original of the
application, including the Checklist, and five signed, photocopies, in one
package to:
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD 20892-7710
Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)
APPLICATION PROCESSING: Applications must be received by the application
receipt date listed in the heading of this RFA. If an application is
received after that date, it will be returned to the applicant without
review.
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will not accept any application in
response to this RFA that is essentially the same as one currently pending
initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. CSR
will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already
reviewed. This does not preclude the submission of substantial revisions of
applications already reviewed, but such applications must include an
Introduction addressing the previous critique.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by CSR and
responsiveness by NIMH. Incomplete and/or non-responsive applications will
be returned to the applicant without further consideration. Applications
that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be evaluated for scientific
and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened by CSR in
accordance with the review criteria stated below. As part of the initial
merit review, all applications will:
o Receive a written critique
o Undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the
highest scientific merit, generally the top half of the applications under
review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score
o Receive a second level review by the National Advisory Mental Health
Council.
REVIEW CRITERIA
The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of
biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In
the written comments, reviewers will be asked to discuss the following
aspects of your application in order to judge the likelihood that the
proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these
goals:
o Significance
o Approach
o Innovation
o Investigator
o Environment
The scientific review group will address and consider each of these criteria
in assigning your application's overall score, weighting them as appropriate
for each application. Your application does not need to be strong in all
categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus
deserve a high priority score. For example, you may propose to carry out
important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move
a field forward.
(1) SIGNIFICANCE: If the aims of the application are achieved and research
resources for genetics studies are freely shared with the scientific
community, how will knowledge on the genetic basis of mental disorders be
advanced? What will be the effect of these research resources on other
scientific activities that drive this field?
(2) APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design, and methods to be used
for the receipt and sharing of research resources and provision of services
to the scientific community adequately developed, well-integrated, and
appropriate? Will the meta-analytic methods to be developed, and the
statistical genetic services to be provided, succeed in accelerating the
discovery of genes producing vulnerability to mental disorders? Does the
applicant utilize state-of-the-art methods to create efficient web-based
databases of clinical and genotypic data? Does the investigator utilize
appropriate molecular biological techniques to assure a high rate of success
(98% or greater) in establishing cell lines from both domestic and foreign
sites?
(3) INNOVATION: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches, or
methods for the production and sharing of research resources, for the
development of analytic methods for meta-analytic studies, and for resolution
of the discrepancies in linkage findings obtained in multiple data sets for
mental disorders? Does the project employ novel methods by which linkage
findings from multiple genomic scans may be jointly analyzed to fine map
disease susceptibility loci?
(4) INVESTIGATOR: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well-suited
to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience
level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)? Does the
principal investigator have demonstrated experience in providing high-quality
research resources and services for genetic studies on mental disorders to
the scientific community? Is the principal investigator highly committed to
the principals of free and open sharing of research resources for genetic
studies of mental disorders?
(5) ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be
done contribute to the probability of success? Does the proposed work take
advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful
collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support?
ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA: In addition to the above criteria, your
application will also be reviewed with respect to the following:
o PROTECTIONS: The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans or the
environment, to the extent they may be adversely affected by the project
proposed in the application.
o INCLUSION: The adequacy of plans to include subjects from both genders,
all racial and ethnic groups (and subgroups), and children as appropriate for
the scientific goals of the research. Plans for the recruitment and
retention of subjects will also be evaluated. (See Inclusion Criteria
included in the section on Federal Citations, below)
o DATA SHARING: The adequacy of the proposed plan to share data, and to
provide research resources and scientific services to the community.
o BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested
period of support in relation to the proposed research.
o OTHER REVIEW CRITERIA: The adequacy of the proposed fee-for-service plan,
including administration and funds management.
RECEIPT AND REVIEW SCHEDULE
Pre-Application Meeting: May 15, 2002
Letter of Intent Receipt Date: September 16, 2002
Application Receipt Date: October 16, 2002
Peer Review Date: February/March 2003
Council Review: May 2003
Early Anticipated Start Date: July 1, 2003
AWARD CRITERIA
Criteria that will be used to make award decisions include:
o Scientific merit, as determined by peer review
o Availability of funds
o Programmatic priorities and program balance
o Commitment to the long-term scientific mission, goals, and objectives of
the NIMH Human Genetics Initiative
REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS
INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH: It is the policy of
the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations
must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a
clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is
inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of
the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993
(Section 492B of Public Law 103-43).
All investigators proposing clinical research should read the AMENDMENT "NIH
Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical
Research - Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and
Contracts on October 9, 2001 (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-
files/NOT-OD-02-001.html); a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are
available at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm.
The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical
research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB
standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical
trials consistent with the new PHS Form 398; and updated roles and
responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy
continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a)
all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of
plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by
sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable;
and b) investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting
analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group
differences.
INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS:
The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of
21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported
by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include
them. This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for
receipt dates after October 1, 1998.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the
"NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as participants in
research involving human subjects that is available at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm.
REQUIRED EDUCATION ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECT PARTICIPANTS: NIH
policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants for
all investigators submitting NIH proposals for research involving human
subjects. You will find this policy announcement in the NIH Guide for Grants
and Contracts Announcement, dated June 5, 2000, at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
PUBLIC ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT: The
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to
provide public access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a
project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2)
cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action
that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed
through FOIA. It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope
of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm.
Applicants may wish to place data collected under this RFA in a public
archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the
distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should
include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include
information about this in the budget justification section of the
application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure
informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the
potential for wider use of data collected under this award.
URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES: All applications and proposals
for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations.
Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, Internet addresses (URLs)
should not be used to provide information necessary to the review because
reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites. Furthermore,
we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be compromised when they
directly access an Internet site.
HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to
achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy
People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This
RFA is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants
may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at
http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS: This program is described in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.242, and is not subject to the
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health
Systems Agency review. Awards are made under authorization of Sections 301
and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and
administered under NIH grants policies described at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm and under Federal Regulations
42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.
The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free
workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition,
Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in
certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which
regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early
childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent
with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of
the American people.