Department of Health and Human Services

Part 1. Overview Information
Participating Organization(s)

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Components of Participating Organizations

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Funding Opportunity Title

Limited Competition for the Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating Center (U01)

Activity Code

U01 Research Project – Cooperative Agreements

Announcement Type

Reissue of RFA-DK-08-010

Related Notices

  • September 21, 2018 - This RFA has been reissued as RFA-DK-18-508.
  • August 21, 2013: Removed reference to ASSIST in section IV.3, since ASSIST is currently only available for multi-project applications.

Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number


Companion Funding Opportunity

RFA-DK-13-012, U01 Research Project – Cooperative Agreement

Number of Applications

See Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s)

93.847, 93.855 

Funding Opportunity Purpose

This FOA invites a limited competition, renewal application to participate in the Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium (ISCC) as the Coordinating Center. The consortium Coordinating Center will facilitate activities of the consortium and facilitate communication of research results, data and methods within the consortium and to the community.  

Key Dates
Posted Date

August 5, 2013

Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)

October 21, 2013

Letter of Intent Due Date(s)

October 21, 2013

Application Due Date(s)

November 21, 2013, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.

Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.

AIDS Application Due Date(s)

Not Applicable

Scientific Merit Review

February/March, 2014

Advisory Council Review

May, 2014

Earliest Start Date

July, 2014

Expiration Date

November 22, 2013

Due Dates for E.O. 12372

Not Applicable

Required Application Instructions

It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

Table of Contents

Part 1. Overview Information
Part 2. Full Text of the Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section II. Award Information
Section III. Eligibility Information
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
Section V. Application Review Information
Section VI. Award Administration Information
Section VII. Agency Contacts
Section VIII. Other Information

Part 2. Full Text of Announcement

Section I. Funding Opportunity Description


This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) will continue the Coordinating Center (CC) for a research consortium, the Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium (ISCC).  In order to maximize scientific exchange and accelerate this area of research, information, data, biomaterials, models, reagents, resources and methods will be shared within the ISCC and with the research community.  The consortium Coordinating Center will facilitate activities of the consortium and facilitate communication of research results, data and methods within the consortium and to the community.  The Research Projects are being considered under RFA-DK-13-012 "Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Research Projects (U01)."


The absorptive and protective functions of the intestine depend in part on the intestinal epithelium.  This epithelium is characterized by continual turnover, with cells lost at the surface (large intestine) or villi (small intestine) and replaced from stem and progenitor cells in the crypts.  These stem cells, influenced by other cells, extracellular factors and factors in the lumen, produce the multiple cell types necessary for healthy epithelial function and self-renew to continue to replenish the epithelium.  However, in diseased or inflamed conditions, the epithelium may not be renewed at the pace needed to maintain a barrier against the potentially harmful contents of the digestive tract.  The resulting exacerbation of inflammation is thought to contribute to the development and/or maintenance of inflammation-related conditions and diseases of the intestine.  Thus, the ability of resident stem cells to heal and maintain the epithelial barrier, commensurate with the need resulting from epithelial cell loss, is essential to normal function of the intestine.

While the existence of stem cells in the intestinal epithelium has been known for decades, these cells have only been isolated more recently.  The isolation and characterization of the stem cells are key to research on their roles in biology and disease of the intestine, determining the influence of environmental (niche) factors, and to development of therapies influencing or using the stem cells to contribute to healing or modulation of inflammation. 

In the mouse, several different molecular markers of putative intestinal stem cells have been described.  The different markers and methods label cells in sometimes different and sometimes overlapping locations in the epithelium in vivo.  The functional significance of the differences and overlaps in labeling of cells at these locations is an active area of study, and some labeled populations have been demonstrated to generate the full complement of intestinal epithelial cell types.  Evidence points to the existence of more than one population of stem cells and in some cases, either inter-conversion between populations, or derivation of other populations from upstream populations, under conditions that require healing from injury.  As yet, it is unclear how stem cell populations identified with different markers in the mouse relate to each other in normal or disease and healing conditions.  It is unclear how the populations found in mouse relate to those that may exist in the human, and how human populations may interact as a system to renew and heal epithelium.  Considerable work needs to be done to more fully understand which populations act as stem cells to maintain or heal the epithelium, the regulation of stem cells and what cells and factors in the environment control activity of the stem cells.  Further work is needed on how this knowledge can best be used to develop therapies that will enhance epithelial repair, and allow for replacement or regeneration of intestinal segments. 

Studies in these areas have been aided by a coordinated, collaborative effort established with the first project period of the ISCC.  The ISCC web site can be found at and describes ongoing studies to isolate and characterize intestinal stem cells, compare populations, and determine how their activity is controlled.  This initiative began as a result of the NIDDK workshop on Local Influences on Health and Repair of Intestinal Epithelium held March 25-26, 2008.  In addition, this research underpins multiple goals in the Research Plan of the National Commission on Digestive Diseases (  While this announcement emphasizes stem cells of the small intestine, it is anticipated that the methods and research results from the supported ISCC projects will aid similar studies in other areas of the gastrointestinal tract and other organs.

Coordinating Center (CC) Objectives and Scope

The CC will be responsible for facilitating administration, study development and analysis; obtaining standardized resources; and data and information sharing within the ISCC, as well as data and information sharing with the research community.  The continuation of the ISCC will likely provide new opportunities for investigators to collaborate on research and for the CC to develop new data analysis and interface functions.  Thus, the CC must include scientific expertise appropriate to the research area of this FOA.

The CC project must include but is not limited to:

Activities of the CC will be undertaken with input from, and through cooperation with, the Steering Committee and with advice from the External Consultants.  It is expected that the CC will make necessary adjustments to accommodate changes to research projects, new collaborations and new research needs as research advances.

Organization of the ISCC

The ISCC will consist of the following components:  the NIH, research projects, a Coordinating Center (CC), a Steering Committee and its Subcommittees, External Consultants, Working Groups and other committees as needed.

The NIDDK will be responsible for organizing and providing support for the ISCC and will be involved substantially with the awardees as a “partner” consistent with the Cooperative Agreement mechanism.  Designated NIDDK Program Officers will provide programmatic oversight, and will monitor progress and adherence to NIH policies.  An NIDDK Project Scientist will also be designated and will have one vote on the Steering Committee.  The NIDDK will appoint the Chairperson of the Steering Committee, and the External Consultants. 

Steering Committee

A network of synergistic projects will be established through this program to enable multiple, but coordinated, approaches to advance this area of research.  The Consortium will be governed by a Steering Committee to coordinate and facilitate research activities for the overall program and to ensure synergy and efficiency.  In addition, the Steering Committee will determine policies and implement processes for quality assurance of any data and information disseminated through public resources or activities of the CC.  The Steering Committee will also be responsible for establishing and implementing a process for recommendation of pilot projects for consideration for funding consistent with expectations set forth in this announcement.  The Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PDs/PIs) (or the Contact PD/PI, in the case of Multiple PDs/PIs grants) from all awarded U01 cooperative agreements (research projects and CC) will be members of the Steering Committee.  In the case of projects with multiple PDs/PIs, the designation of the member, Contact PD/PI, must be a part of the Multiple PD/PI Leadership Plan.

ISCC members will cooperate within the Consortium to share resources, materials, models, methods, information and data to facilitate progress.  All research groups will share responsibility for program development and resource coordination through the ISCC Steering Committee that will be established upon award of the grants.  When appropriate, and in accordance with NIH policies ( and, U01 awardees will be expected to collaborate; share novel reagents, biomaterials, methods, models and resources; and share both positive and negative results that would help guide the research activities of other ISCC members.  The NIDDK, in concert with the ISCC Steering Committee, will have the option to redirect research activities within the ISCC grants if it is considered beneficial to the overall program.

During the course of the funding period, knowledge and technologies will likely improve, and the rate of progress and focus of work supported by the cooperative agreement may change.  It is expected that the PDs/PIs, in consultation with NIH Program staff and the Steering Committee, will make necessary adjustments to accommodate the changing research environment, to remain focused on appropriate goals, to maintain excellent coordination with the other projects to avoid overlaps and competition within the Consortium, and to incorporate new research advances.

Bi-annual Meetings of the ISCC Steering Committee

Members of the Steering Committee must participate in person in an initial meeting soon after award, as well as meetings to be held at least bi-annually thereafter.  Meetings are expected to be 1-2 days long.  In addition, Subcommittees and Working Groups of the Steering Committee may be established and require participation by the members through in-person, electronic, or teleconference meetings as appropriate.  Steering Committee meetings will be organized and administered by the CC in order to determine the final coordinated research projects to be conducted by the research grantees; determine the administrative and scientific needs to be fulfilled by the CC in coordination with the final research projects; share both positive and negative results; share materials including reagents and techniques; evaluate progress; and identify new research opportunities.  At the initial meeting, and thereafter as needed, the Steering Committee members will develop policies for confidentiality, what information and materials will be shared, when they will be shared, and how they will be shared within the ISCC and with the research community.  All participants will be obligated to abide by the policies adopted by majority vote of the Steering Committee.    The CC is responsible for providing and maintaining a record of minutes of the meetings, which will be approved by the Steering Committee Chair and Committee membership.  The CC budget should include costs to arrange the Steering Committee meetings, costs of travel for External Consultants, and costs to generate minutes.  Any Subcommittee and conference call meetings will be similarly documented by the CC.  The External Consultants will meet approximately yearly with the Steering Committee.

External Consultants

The NIDDK will appoint 3-5 External Consultants to meet with the Steering Committee.  This group will be updated on progress and give feedback to the Steering Committee and NIH on adjustments and future directions for the ISCC research projects and CC.  The CC will support costs for consultants to meet once yearly with the Steering Committee.

Pilot and Feasibility Studies

Depending on availability of funds, and as unexpected research opportunities arise, the NIH plans to use administrative supplements to support small exploratory pilot and feasibility research projects recommended by the Steering Committee and approved by the NIH, including external review as appropriate, in order to capitalize on emerging opportunities.  The Steering Committee will establish goals, priorities, and evaluation criteria for their recommendations of projects to the NIH.  PDs/PIs awarded under this FOA will have an opportunity to request funds, but, optimally, projects proposed for these funds will include outside collaboration and clearly have the potential to lead to ancillary studies (see PAR-13-066).  Expenditure of funds will be restricted until a process for the prioritization, solicitation and evaluation of proposals is established and agreed upon in writing by the Steering Committee.

Annual continuation of funds for the CC is dependent on demonstrated progress from the previous year’s funding.  

Section II. Award Information
Funding Instrument

Cooperative Agreement: A support mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities.

Application Types Allowed


The OER Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types.

Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards

NIDDK intends to commit an estimated total of $600,000 to fund one award in FY 2014.

Award Budget

Application budgets are limited to $350,000 direct costs per year.

Award Project Period

The maximum project period is 5 years. 

NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.

Section III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants

Eligible Organizations

Higher Education Institutions

The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:

Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education

For-Profit Organizations



This is a limited competition FOA. Only the currently awardee is eligible to apply for this FOA.   

Foreign Institutions

Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are not allowed.

Required Registrations

Applicant Organizations

Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. The NIH Policy on Late Submission of Grant Applications states that failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission.

Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))

All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account and should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate an existing account with the applicant organization’s eRA Commons account. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.

Eligible Individuals (Program Director/Principal Investigator)

Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with his/her organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support.

For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

Only the currently participating ISSC Coordinating Center Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) is eligible to apply for this FOA.  

2. Cost Sharing

This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

3. Additional Information on Eligibility

Number of Applications

Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.

NIH will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed within the past thirty-seven months (as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement), except for submission:

Section IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Requesting an Application Package

Applicants must download the SF424 (R&R) application package associated with this funding opportunity using the “Apply for Grant Electronically” button in this FOA or following the directions provided at

2. Content and Form of Application Submission

It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed in this funding opportunity announcement to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

For information on Application Submission and Receipt, visit Frequently Asked Questions – Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.

Letter of Intent

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.

By the date listed in Part 1. Overview Information, prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:

The letter of intent, preferably electronically, should be sent to:

Francisco Calvo, Ph.D.
Chief, Review Branch
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707 Democracy Boulevard
Room 752, MSC 5452
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452
Telephone: 301-594-8897

Page Limitations

All page limitations described in the SF424 Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.

Required and Optional Components

The forms package associated with this FOA includes all applicable components, required and optional. Please note that some components marked optional in the application package are required for submission of applications for this FOA. Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide to ensure you complete all appropriate “optional” components.

Instructions for Application Submission

The following section supplements the instructions found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this FOA.

SF424(R&R) Cover

All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.

SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations

All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.

SF424(R&R) Other Project Information

All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.

SF424(R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile

All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:

The Biographical Sketch must include a Personal Statement that addresses experiences that make the investigator particularly well suited for their role.  For this FOA, this statement must address past collaborative interactions leading to research progress as evidence of ability to participate in a consortium with shared and collaborative research projects and objectives.

R&R Budget

All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:

The meetings of the Consortium are the responsibility of the CC and the CC budget should include costs for travel and attendance of the External Consultants at one meeting per year.  There will be bi-annual meetings of the Steering Committee, anticipated to take place in Bethesda, MD or sites housing the research projects.  There will also be conference calls for meetings of Subcommittees and Working Groups.  The CC application should request a budget for costs of the Steering Committee meetings except for costs for research project investigators to travel and attend the meetings.

Budget requests must include costs for the PD/PI and other essential members of the CC to attend the initial meeting and the bi-annual meetings.

Budget requests should include $20,000 per year for purchase of common reagents for collaborative projects and shared protocols.

PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement

All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed.

PHS 398 Research Plan

All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:

Research Strategy: Applications should describe ways the Coordinating Center for the Consortium will increase opportunities for the proposed research and maximize its benefits.  Projects to be conducted by the consortium will be shaped by the Steering Committee and may incorporate or alter the proposed research to maximize coordination and efficiency of the consortium.  Applications for the CC must demonstrate within the research plan the ability to interface with the scientific areas of investigation that are included within this consortium.  Because of the central role of the CC to interact with the other PDs/PIs and the scientific community, in order to synthesize and usefully present research results and information, purely administrative responses, without the demonstrated scientific interface, are not appropriate in response to this FOA.  The Research Strategy should include a plan for scientific interface with the PDs/PIs and scientific community.  The Research Strategy should describe the capacity and flexibility for meeting the needs of the consortium and the research community and for integration of information from the projects.  The final plans of the CC will be adjusted to accommodate the final projects undertaken by the consortium.

Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans (Data Sharing Plan, Sharing Model Organisms, and Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS)) as provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, with the following modification:

Appendix: Do not use the Appendix to circumvent page limits. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

Planned Enrollment Report

When conducting clinical research, follow all instructions for completing Planned Enrollment Reports as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. 

PHS 398 Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment Report

When conducting clinical research, follow all instructions for completing Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment Report as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. 

3. Submission Dates and Times

Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission.

Organizations must submit applications to, the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies. Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration. NIH and systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to on or before the application due date.  If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late.

Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.

Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

4. Intergovernmental Review (E.O. 12372)

This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.

5. Funding Restrictions

All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

6. Other Submission Requirements and Information

Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.  Paper applications will not be accepted.

Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.

For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit Applying Electronically.

Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the SF424(R&R) Application Package. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this FOA for information on registration requirements.

The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

See more tips for avoiding common errors.

Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by NIDDK, NIH. Applications that are incomplete and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.  

In order to expedite review, applicants are requested to notify the NIDDK Referral Office by email at  when the application has been submitted. Please include the FOA number and title, PD/PI name, and title of the application.

Post-Submission Materials

Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in NOT-OD-13-030.

Section V. Application Review Information

1. Criteria

Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. As part of the NIH mission, all applications submitted to the NIH in support of biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.

Overall Impact

Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).

Scored Review Criteria

Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.


Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?  


Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, or in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project?   


Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?   


Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed? 

If the project involves clinical research, are the plans for 1) protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion of minorities and members of both sexes/genders, as well as the inclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?  


Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?   

Additional Review Criteria

As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.


Are the proposed plans for accessibility of information and data from the research projects adequate to maximize the potential of the ISCC research results to be of benefit to the Consortium members and the scientific community?  Does the application demonstrate that the proposed CC has the scientific expertise to communicate with the research projects and to synthesize a variety of information into a usable, quality-controlled and actively maintained interface for the user research community? 

Protections for Human Subjects

For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.

For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.

Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children 

When the proposed project involves clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion of minorities and members of both genders, as well as the inclusion of children. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.

Vertebrate Animals

The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following five points: 1) proposed use of the animals, and species, strains, ages, sex, and numbers to be used; 2) justifications for the use of animals and for the appropriateness of the species and numbers proposed; 3) adequacy of veterinary care; 4) procedures for limiting discomfort, distress, pain and injury to that which is unavoidable in the conduct of scientifically sound research including the use of analgesic, anesthetic, and tranquilizing drugs and/or comfortable restraining devices; and 5) methods of euthanasia and reason for selection if not consistent with the AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animal Section.


Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.


Not Applicable.


For Renewals, the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.


Not Applicable

Additional Review Considerations

As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.

Applications from Foreign Organizations

Not Applicable

Select Agent Research

Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).

Resource Sharing Plans

Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable: 1) Data Sharing Plan; 2) Sharing Model Organisms; and 3) Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS).

Budget and Period of Support

Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.

2. Review and Selection Process

Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by the NIDDK, in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.

As part of the scientific peer review, all applications:

Appeals of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this FOA.

Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this FOA. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Advisory Council or Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:

3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates

After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons

Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Section VI. Award Administration Information

1. Award Notices

If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization for successful applications. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via email to the grantee’s business official.

Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs.      

Any application awarded in response to this FOA will be subject to the DUNS, SAM Registration, and Transparency Act requirements as noted on the Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants website.

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General  and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities. More information is provided at Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants.

Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award

The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS grant administration regulations at 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92 (Part 92 is applicable when State and local Governments are eligible to apply), and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.

The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the awardees is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the awardees for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the awardees and the NIH as defined below.

The ISCC consists of Research Project sites and a Coordinating Center, cooperating through a Steering Committee as described above.

The PD(s)/PI(s) will have the primary responsibility for:

NIH Project Scientists will have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below.

Areas of Joint Responsibility include:

Dispute Resolution
Disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between award recipients and the NIH may be brought to arbitration after first attempting to resolve the issue through the Steering Committee or its subcommittees, as appropriate. An Arbitration Panel composed of three members will be convened. It will have three members: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual awardee. This special dispute resolution procedure in no way affects the awardee's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulations 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulations 45 CFR Part 16.

3. Reporting

When multiple years are involved, awardees will be required to submit the annual Non-Competing Progress Report (PHS 2590 or RPPR) and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

A final progress report, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act), includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later.  All awardees of applicable NIH grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at on all subawards over $25,000.  See the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement. 

Section VII. Agency Contacts

We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.

Application Submission Contacts

eRA Commons Help Desk (Questions regarding eRA Commons registration, submitting and tracking an application, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, post submission issues)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)

Web ticketing system:
TTY: 301-451-5939
Email: Customer Support (Questions regarding registration and submission, downloading forms and application packages)
Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726

Web ticketing system:

GrantsInfo (Questions regarding application instructions and process, finding NIH grant resources)
Telephone: 301-710-0267
TTY: 301-451-5936

Scientific/Research Contact(s)

Jill Carrington, Ph.D;
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Telephone: 301-402-0671

Peer Review Contact(s)

Francisco Calvo, Ph.D.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Telephone:  301-594-8897

Financial/Grants Management Contact(s)

Kieran Kelley
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Telephone: 301-594-2193

Section VIII. Other Information

Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Authority and Regulations

Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.

Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices

NIH Office of Extramural Research Logo
  Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Home Page Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) - Government Made Easy
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health®

Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files.