Department of Health and Human Services
Participating Organizations
National Institutes of
Health (NIH) (http://www.nih.gov)
Components of Participating
Organizations
National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) (http://www.niddk.nih.gov)
Title: Clinical Nutrition Research Unit Core Centers (P30)
Announcement Type
New
Request For Applications (RFA) Number: RFA-DK-06-013
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number(s)
93.848
Key Dates
Release Date: May 16, 2006
Letters of Intent
Receipt Date(s): October 24, 2006
Application Receipt
Date(s): November
21, 2006
Peer Review Date(s): February-March 2007
Council Review Date(s): May 2007
Earliest Anticipated
Start Date(s): July
2007
Expiration Date: November 22, 2006
Due Dates for E.O. 12372
Not Applicable
Additional Overview
Content
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Part I
Overview Information
Part II Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity
Description
1. Research Objectives
Section II. Award Information
1. Mechanism(s) of Support
2. Funds Available
Section III. Eligibility
Information
1. Eligible Applicants
A. Eligible Institutions
B. Eligible Individuals
2.Cost Sharing or Matching
3. Other - Special Eligibility Criteria
Section IV. Application and
Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application
Information
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
3. Submission Dates and Times
A. Receipt and Review and
Anticipated Start Dates
1. Letter of
Intent
B. Sending an Application to
the NIH
C. Application Processing
4. Intergovernmental Review
5. Funding Restrictions
6. Other Submission Requirements
Section V. Application Review
Information
1. Criteria
2. Review and Selection Process
A. Additional Review Criteria
B. Additional Review
Considerations
C. Sharing Research Data
D. Sharing Research Resources
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award
Dates
Section VI. Award Administration
Information
1. Award Notices
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
3. Reporting
Section VII. Agency Contact(s)
1. Scientific/Research Contact(s)
2. Peer Review Contact(s)
3. Financial/ Grants Management Contact(s)
Section VIII. Other Information
- Required Federal Citations
Part II
- Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Research Objectives
The objective of the Clinical Nutrition Research Units is to bring together basic science and clinical investigators from relevant disciplines to enhance and extend the effectiveness of research related to nutritional sciences, obesity, and related disorders, with clinical and/or translational applications in these areas. A Core Center must be an identifiable unit within a university or medical center or a consortium of cooperating institutions, including an affiliated university. An existing program of excellence in biomedical basic and clinical research in the areas of nutritional sciences, obesity, and related disorders is required. The research must be in the form of research project grants (R01), program project grants (P01), or other peer-reviewed research that is already funded by NIH, other Federal Agencies, or non-federal groups at the time of submission of the Center grant application. It is required that at least fifty percent of the nutritional sciences and obesity or other related disorders research comprising the research base be supported by Federal Agencies. Close cooperation, communication, and collaboration among all involved personnel of various professional disciplines are ultimate objectives.
The availability of a subject population with adequate representation of women and minorities that can be readily utilized by investigators will play a major role in attracting investigators to the field of nutritional sciences, obesity and related disorders research and will serve as a resource in the design of pilot and feasibility projects. Close cooperation, communication, and collaboration among all involved personnel of all professional disciplines are ultimate objectives. Applicants should consult with NIDDK staff concerning plans for the development of the Center and the organization of the application.
The Clinical Nutrition Research Units are based on the core concept. Four to six cores are usually included in a Center. Cores are defined as shared resources that enhance productivity or in other ways benefit a group of investigators working in nutritional sciences, obesity and related disorders research to accomplish the stated goals of the Center. Examples of such resources include biostatistics, imaging, biotechnology, and instrumentation facilities. It is appropriate and may be beneficial to have one or more central themes around which core center research investigations are focused.
Centers are encouraged to include a clinical component or core that deals with patients. This clinical component can exist as a stand alone core or part of another core such as the administrative core. Besides leading to a better understanding of disease etiology and natural history of disease, such cores might provide biostatistics support; enhance clinical study design; enhance collaboration among researchers and recruitment of subjects for clinical studies; provide for epidemiological studies; or provide modest funding for tissue, DNA, or serum storage. In addition, a clinical or epidemiology core may more effectively address NIH policies concerning issues of children, women, and ethnic minority participation in clinical studies.
Two other types of activities should also be supported with Center funding: a pilot and feasibility (P/F) program and an enrichment program. The P/F program provides modest support for new initiatives or feasibility research studies. This program is directed at new investigators, at investigators established in other research disciplines with expertise that may be applied to obesity and nutritional sciences research, and at established investigators who wish to make a substantial change in the direction of their nutritional sciences or obesity-related research. It is expected that the majority of P/F project investigators will fall into the first category and only in exceptional circumstances will investigators in the third category be supported. In addition, temporary salary support for one Named New Investigator in a specified area of research with a defined P/F study may be requested for up to 24 months, with subsequent individuals to be named by the Center Director and approved by the Center's External Advisory Board and the NIDDK. The Core Center grant may include limited funds for program enrichment such as seminars, visiting scientists, consultants, and workshops.
See Section VIII, Other Information - Required Federal
Citations, for policies related to this announcement.
Section
II. Award Information
1. Mechanism(s) of Support
This
funding opportunity will use the Core Center (P30) award mechanism. As an applicant, you
will be solely responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed
project.
This funding opportunity
uses the just-in-time budget concepts. It also uses the non-modular budget
format described in the PHS 398 application instructions (see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html).
A detailed categorical budget for the "Initial Budget Period" and the
"Entire Proposed Period of Support" is to be submitted with the
application.
2. Funds Available
The National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) intends to commit approximately $2,000,000 dollars in FY 2007 to fund two new and/or
competing continuation grants in response to this RFA. An applicant may request
a project period of up to five years and a budget for direct costs of up to 750,000 dollars per
year.
Because the nature and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application, it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary. Although the financial plans of the NIDDK provide support for this program, awards pursuant to this funding opportunity are contingent upon the availability of funds and the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
Facilities and administrative costs requested by
consortium participants are not included in the direct cost limitation, see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-05-004.html .
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
1.A. Eligible Institutions
You may submit an
application if your organization has any of the following characteristics:
1.B.
Eligible Individuals
Any
individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the
proposed research is invited to work with his or her institution to develop an
application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic
groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply
for NIH support.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
There is
no cost sharing, matching, or cost participation required for this application. The most
current Grants Policy Statement can be found at: https://grants.nih.gov/archive/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm#matching_or_cost_sharing
3. Other-Special Eligibility Criteria
The CNRU Director, who is
the Principal Investigator on the P30 application and Director of the
Administrative Core, should be a scientist who can provide effective
administrative and scientific leadership and can demonstrate proficiency in
managing a large, multi-component project. The Director will be responsible for
the organization and operation of the CNRU and for communication with the NIDDK
on scientific and operational matters. Center Directors are required, and their
administrators are strongly encouraged, to attend an annual meeting to be held
at a location to be determined by the NIDDK. Funds for travel to this meeting
should be included in the budget for the Administrative Core of the Center.
Successful CNRU applications require an existing program of excellence in biomedical research in the areas of basic and clinical research related to the nutritional sciences, obesity, and related disorders. To justify Core Center support, the CNRU must serve a strong research base that has a consistent and outstanding record in NIH and other peer-reviewed funding. The research base grants must be summarized in accordance with the Administrative Guidelines for NIDDK Clinical Nutrition Research Units (CNRU). (See Application Procedures.) http://www.niddk.nih.gov/fund/other/centers/cnru-guidelines.pdf
At least 50 percent of the nutritional sciences, obesity, and related disorders research comprising the research base must be supported by Federal Agencies. As stated under the Review Criteria in this document, the most important component of a CNRU is an ongoing, strong research base in nutritional sciences, obesity, and related disorders.
Scientific personnel and institutional resources capable of supporting the research base must be available. In addition, the institution and pertinent departments must show a strong commitment to the Center’s support. Such commitment may be provided as dedicated space, staff recruitment, salary support for investigators, dedicated equipment, or other financial support for the proposed Center.
Each core unit proposed for funding under the CNRU must be utilized by a minimum of two federally funded research projects. A detailed description of each core unit proposed as part of the Center must be provided, with a detailed budget and budget justification. A Core director must be named for each core proposed. The description of each core unit proposed should include a rationale, indicating how it will support the research effort in a cost-effective manner. Facilities must be available for the primary needs of the CNRU Program because funds for new construction are not available.
Promoting interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary collaboration among scientists working within a Center is a major goal of the CNRU Program. Each Center application should describe how continuing and new interactions will be fostered and encouraged by the CNRU.
Another
goal of the CNRU is to attract scientists to the fields of nutritional
sciences, obesity, and related disorders. Therefore, a Pilot and Feasibility
(P/F) program will be supported to provide modest support for new initiatives
or feasibility research studies. Further, the CNRU may include limited funds to
support an Enrichment Program such as seminars, visiting scientists,
consultants, and workshops. For the purpose of this RFA, the NIDDK will not
support more than one CNRU grant (P30) in an applicant institution.
Section
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Information
The PHS 398 application
instructions are available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in an interactive format. Applicants must use the currently approved version of
the PHS 398. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone (301)
710-0267, Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov.
Telecommunications for
the hearing impaired: TTY 301-451-5936.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Applications must be
prepared using the most current PHS 398 research grant application instructions
and forms. Applications must have a D&B Data Universal Numbering System
(DUNS) number as the universal identifier when applying for Federal grants or
cooperative agreements. The D&B number can be obtained by calling (866)
705-5711 or through the web site at http://www.dnb.com/us/.
The D&B number should be entered on line 11 of the face page of the PHS 398
form.
The title and number of this funding opportunity must
be typed on line 2 of the face page of the application form and the YES box
must be checked.
The CNRU Guidelines provide
more detailed information on the Centers and on preparing the application. The
guidelines are accessible at http://www.niddk.nih.gov/fund/other/centers/cnru-guidelines.pdf or from the program director listed below under Scientific/Research Contact (Section
VII.1).
3.
Submission Dates and Times
Applications must be
received on or before the receipt date described below (Section
IV.3.A).
3.A.
Receipt, Review and Anticipated Start Dates
Letter of Intent Receipt
Date(s): October 24, 2006
Application Receipt
Date(s): November 21, 2006
Peer Review Date(s): February-March 2007
Council Review
Date(s): May 2007
Earliest Anticipated
Start Date(s): July
2007
3.A.1. Letter of Intent
Prospective applicants
are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
The letter of intent is to be sent by the date listed above
and at the beginning of this document.
The letter of intent
should be sent to:
Francisco O. Calvo, Ph.D.
Chief, Review
Branch
National
Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707 Democracy
Boulevard,
Rm. 752
Bethesda, MD
20892-5452
(for
express/courier service: Bethesda, MD 20817)
Telephone: (301) 594-8897
FAX: (301) 480-3505
Email: fc15y@nih.gov
3.B. Sending an
Application to the NIH
Applications must be
prepared using the research grant applications found in the PHS 398
instructions for preparing a research grant application. Submit a signed,
typewritten original of the application, including the checklist, and three signed photocopies in one package
to:
Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD 20892-7710 (U.S. Postal Service Express
or regular mail)
Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service;
non-USPS service)
Personal deliveries of
applications are no longer permitted (see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-040.html).
At the time of
submission, two additional copies of the application and all copies of the
appendix material must be sent to:
Francisco O. Calvo, Ph.D.
Chief, Review Branch
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Rm. 752
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452
(for express/courier service: Bethesda, MD 20817)
Telephone:
(301) 594-8897
FAX:
(301) 480-3505
Email: fc15y@nih.gov
Using the RFA Label: The RFA label available in
the PHS 398 application instructions must be affixed to the bottom of the face
page of the application. Type the RFA number on the label. Failure to use this
label could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may
not reach the review committee in time for review. In addition, the RFA title
and number must be typed on line 2 of the face page of the application form and
the YES box must be marked. The RFA label is also available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/labels.pdf.
3.C. Application
Processing
Applications must be received on or before the
application receipt date described above (Section IV.3.A.).
If an application is received after that date, it will be returned to the
applicant without review. Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for
completeness by the CSR and responsiveness by the NIDDK. Incomplete and non-responsive
applications will not be reviewed.
The NIH will not accept
any application in response to this funding opportunity that is essentially the
same as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws
the pending application. However, when a previously unfunded application,
originally submitted as an investigator-initiated application, is to be
submitted in response to a funding opportunity, it is to be prepared as a NEW
application. That is, the application for the funding opportunity must not
include an Introduction describing the changes and improvements made, and the
text must not be marked to indicate the changes from the previous unfunded
version of the application.
Information on the
status of an application should be checked by the Principal Investigator in the
eRA Commons at: https://commons.era.nih.gov/commons/.
4. Intergovernmental Review
This initiative is not
subject to intergovernmental
review.
5. Funding Restrictions
All NIH awards are
subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations
described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The Grants Policy Statement can
be found at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm.
Pre-Award Costs are
allowable. A grantee may, at its own risk and without NIH prior approval, incur
obligations and expenditures to cover costs up to 90 days before the beginning
date of the initial budget period of a new or competing continuation award if
such costs: are necessary to conduct the project, and would be allowable under
the grant, if awarded, without NIH prior approval. If specific expenditures
would otherwise require prior approval, the grantee must obtain NIH approval
before incurring the cost. NIH prior approval is required for any costs to be
incurred more than 90 days before the beginning date of the initial budget
period of a new or competing continuation award.
The incurrence of
pre-award costs in anticipation of a competing or non-competing award imposes
no obligation on NIH either to make the award or to increase the amount of the
approved budget if an award is made for less than the amount anticipated and is
inadequate to cover the pre-award costs incurred. NIH expects the grantee to be
fully aware that pre-award costs result in borrowing against future support and
that such borrowing must not impair the grantee's ability to accomplish the
project objectives in the approved time frame or in any way adversely affect
the conduct of the project. See NIH Grants Policy Statement https://grants.nih.gov/archive/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm.
6. Other Submission Requirements
Additional application
instructions are available in the Clinical Nutrition Research Unit Guidelines
available on the internet at http://www.niddk.nih.gov/fund/other/centers/cnru-guidelines.doc or from the Program Director
listed below under Scientific/Research Contacts (Section VII.1).
Plan for Sharing Research
Data
NA
Since
these are P30 applications to set up core services to support other research
projects, these cores will not maintain data that can be shared.
Sharing Research Resources
NA
Section
V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
Only the review criteria
described below will be considered in the review process.
The following will be
considered in making funding decisions:
2. Review and Selection Process
Applications that are complete
and responsive to the RFA will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit
by an appropriate peer review group convened by NIDDK in accordance with the
review criteria stated below.
As part of the initial
merit review, all applications will:
The goals of NIH supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, to improve the control of disease, and to enhance health. In their written critiques, reviewers will be asked to comment on each of the following criteria in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed and considered in assigning the overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application.
All applications responding to this RFA will be evaluated according to the review criteria as outlined in the Clinical Nutrition Research Unit Administrative Guidelines available on the Internet at http://www.niddk.nih.gov/fund/other/centers/cnru-guidelines.doc or from the Program Director listed under Scientific/Research Contacts (Section VII.1), below.
As part of the initial scientific review, which will result in one overall priority score for the entire P30 application, reviewers will rate and assign an adjectival descriptor to each individual research core and, if requested, the clinical component, as well as the P/F program, the research base, the Administrative Core, and the Center Director. The evaluation of the Enrichment program will be reflected in the adjectival descriptor of the Administrative Core. The merit descriptors for each of these components will appear in the summary statement.
Review Criteria
The most important component of a CNRU is an ongoing, strong base of research in the areas of nutritional sciences, obesity, and related disorders.
Specific review criteria for CNRU Core Centers are:
• The scientific excellence of the Center's research base (its strengths and depth) as well as the relevance and interrelation of these separately funded research projects to the central theme(s) or focus of the Center and the likelihood for meaningful collaborations among Center investigators. The existence of a base of established, independently supported biomedical research of high quality is a prerequisite for the establishment of a CNRU Core Center and is the most important component of the review.
• The strength of the clinical research components of the center
• The qualifications, experience, and commitment of the Center investigators responsible for the individual research projects, and their willingness to interrelate with each other and contribute to the overall objectives of the CNRU Core Center.
• The appropriateness and relevance of the proposed Cores and their modes of operation (such as how usage will be prioritized), facilities, and potential for contribution to ongoing research. Competing continuation applications must document the use, utility, quality control, and cost effectiveness of each Core requested to continue as part of the Center. Progress will be judged in part by the list of publications arising from the utilization of the cores. At least two users (projects) are required to establish a core. However, a greater number of users will be considered to be more cost effective.
• For all applications, a description of current or proposed P/F studies should be submitted for evaluation as part of the review of the P/F program. In general, for new applications, the proposed P/F projects will be examined to assess the eligibility of the P/F applicant and the adequacy of the selection process by which the individual studies were selected. For competing renewal applications emphasis is accorded to the program as a whole, including past track record and management of the program. Applicants should refer to the Administrative Guidelines for CNRUs (http://www.niddk.nih.gov/fund/other/centers/cnru-guidelines.doc) for specific details regarding the P/F program and its review.
• A Named New Investigator, if requested, will be considered separately.
• The scientific and administrative leadership abilities of the proposed Center Director and Associate Director and their commitment and ability to devote adequate time to the effective management of the program.
• The administrative organization proposed for the following:
• Coordination of ongoing research between the separately funded projects and the Center, including mechanisms for internal monitoring;
• Establishment and maintenance of internal communication and cooperation among the Center investigators;
• Mechanism for selecting and replacing professional or technical personnel within the Core Center;
• Mechanism for reviewing the use of and administering of funds for the P/F program;
• Management capabilities that include fiscal administration, procurement, property and personnel management, planning, budgeting, and other appropriate capabilities;
• The institutional commitment to the program, including lines of accountability regarding management of the Center grant and the institution's contribution to the management capabilities of the Center;
• The academic environment and resources in which the activities will be conducted, including the availability of space, equipment, facilities, and the potential for interaction with scientists from other departments and institutions;
• Efficient and effective use and/or planned use of the limited enrichment funds, including the contribution of these activities in enhancing the objectives of the Center;
• Although the CNRUs do not specifically support research training, it should be a training environment, and demonstration of accomplishments and future plans related to the training of investigators necessary to conduct research in obesity and nutritional sciences will be considered in assessing the potential to meet Center objectives. The integration of these efforts into the overall Center, including core facilities, is of particular importance.
• The appropriateness of the budgets for the proposed and approved work to be done in Core facilities, for P/F studies (these are restricted funds), and for enrichment in relation to the total Center program.
The
application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to
have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score.
2.A.
Additional Review Criteria:
In addition to the
above criteria, the following items will continue to be considered in the
determination of scientific merit and the priority score:
Protection
of Human Subjects from Research Risk: The involvement of human subjects and protections from
research risk relating to their participation in the proposed research will be
assessed (see the Research Plan, Section E on Human Subjects in the PHS Form
398).
Inclusion
of Women, Minorities and Children in Research: The adequacy of plans to
include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic groups (and
subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the
research will be assessed. Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects
will also be evaluated (see the Research Plan, Section E on Human Subjects in
the PHS Form 398).
Care and
Use of Vertebrate Animals in Research: If vertebrate animals are to
be used in the project, the five items described under Section F of the PHS
Form 398 research grant application instructions will be assessed.
Biohazards: If materials or procedures
are proposed that are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the
environment, determine if the proposed protection is adequate.
2.B. Additional Review
Considerations
Budget: The reasonableness of the
proposed budget and the requested period of support in relation to the proposed
research. The priority score should not be affected by the evaluation of the
budget.
2.C. Sharing Research Data
Since these are P30 applications to set up core services to support other
research projects, these cores will not maintain data that can be shared.
2.D. Sharing Research
Resources
NA
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
Applicants can expect to
learn about the disposition of their applications, whether successful or
unsuccessful by June 2007.
Section
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
After the peer review of
the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her
Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons.
If the application is under consideration for funding,
NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant. For
details, applicants may refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms
and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General (https://grants.nih.gov/archive/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm).
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award
(NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization. The NoA signed by the
grants management officer is the authorizing document. Once all administrative
and programmatic issues have been resolved, the NoA will be generated via email
notification from the awarding component to the grantee business official
(designated in item 12 on the Application Face Page). If a grantee is not email
enabled, a hard copy of the NoA will be mailed to the business official.
Selection of an application for award is not an
authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA
are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent
considered allowable pre-award costs. See Also Section
IV.5. Funding Restrictions.
2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
All NIH grant and
cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of
the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II:
Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General (https://grants.nih.gov/archive/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm)
and Part II Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and
Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities (https://grants.nih.gov/archive/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm).
3. Reporting
Awardees will be
required to submit the PHS Non-Competing Grant Progress Report, Form 2590
annually (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/2590/2590.htm)
and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Section
VII. Agency Contacts
We
encourage your inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity
to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into three
areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management
issues:
1. Scientific/Research Contacts:
Carolyn W. Miles, Ph.D.
Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Disease
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 665
Bethesda, MD 20892-5450
Telephone: (301) 451-2759
FAX: (301) 480-8300
Email: cm294e@nih.gov
2. Peer Review Contacts:
Francisco O. Calvo, Ph.D.
Division
of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Diabetes and digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707
Democracy Boulevard, Room 752
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452
Telephone:
(301) 594-8885
FAX:
(301) 480-3505
Email: fc15y@nih.gov
3. Financial or Grants Management Contacts:
Ms.
Sharon Bourque
Division
of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6707
Democracy Boulevard, Room 719
Bethesda, MD 20892-5456
Telephone:
(301) 594-8846
FAX:
(301) 480-3504
Email: sb114m@nih.gov
Section VIII. Other Information
Required Federal Citations
Use of Animals in
Research:
Recipients of PHS
support for activities involving live, vertebrate animals must comply with PHS
Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/PHSPolicyLabAnimals.pdf)
as mandated by the Health Research Extension Act of 1985 (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/hrea1985.htm),
and the USDA Animal Welfare Regulations (http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/usdaleg1.htm)
as applicable.
Human Subjects
Protection:
Federal regulations
(45CFR46) require that applications and proposals involving human subjects must
be evaluated with reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of
protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the
subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained
(http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm).
Data and Safety
Monitoring Plan:
Data and safety
monitoring is required for all types of clinical trials, including physiologic
toxicity and dose-finding studies (phase I); efficacy studies (Phase II);
efficacy, effectiveness and comparative trials (Phase III). Monitoring should
be commensurate with risk. The establishment of data and safety monitoring
boards (DSMBs) is required for multi-site clinical trials involving interventions
that entail potential risks to the participants (NIH Policy for Data and Safety
Monitoring, NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html).
Access to Research
Data through the Freedom of Information Act:
The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to provide access to research
data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances.
Data that are (1) first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in
part with Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a Federal
agency in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a
regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is important for applicants to
understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm.
Applicants may wish to place data collected under this funding opportunity in a
public archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the
distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should
include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include
information about this in the budget justification section of the application.
In addition, applicants should think about how to structure informed consent
statements and other human subjects procedures given the potential for wider
use of data collected under this award.
Sharing of Model
Organisms:
NIH is committed to
support efforts that encourage sharing of important research resources
including the sharing of model organisms for biomedical research (see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/model_organism/index.htm).
At the same time the NIH recognizes the rights of grantees and contractors to
elect and retain title to subject inventions developed with Federal funding
pursuant to the Bayh Dole Act (see the NIH Grants Policy Statement https://grants.nih.gov/archive/archive/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm).
All investigators submitting an NIH application or contract proposal, beginning
with the October 1, 2004 receipt date, are expected to include in the
application/proposal a description of a specific plan for sharing and
distributing unique model organism research resources generated using NIH
funding or state why such sharing is restricted or not possible. This will
permit other researchers to benefit from the resources developed with public
funding. The inclusion of a model organism sharing plan is not subject to a
cost threshold in any year and is expected to be included in all applications
where the development of model organisms is anticipated.
Inclusion of Women
And Minorities in Clinical Research:
It is the policy of the
NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations must be
included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a clear and
compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is inappropriate
with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This
policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public
Law 103-43). All investigators proposing clinical research should read the
"NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in
Clinical Research (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html);
a complete copy of the updated Guidelines is available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm.
The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical
research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB
standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical
trials consistent with the new PHS Form 398; and updated roles and
responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy
continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) all
applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans
to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender
and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and b)
investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting analyses,
as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group differences.
Inclusion of Children
as Participants in Clinical Research:
The NIH maintains a
policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included
in all clinical research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are
scientific and ethical reasons not to include them.
All investigators proposing research involving human
subjects should read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion
of children as participants in research involving human subjects (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm).
Required Education on
the Protection of Human Subject Participants:
NIH policy requires
education on the protection of human subject participants for all investigators
submitting NIH applications for research involving human subjects and
individuals designated as key personnel. The policy is available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
Human Embryonic Stem
Cells (hESC):
Criteria for federal
funding of research on hESCs can be found at http://stemcells.nih.gov/index.asp and at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-005.html.
Only research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human Embryonic
Stem Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal funding (http://escr.nih.gov). It is the responsibility
of the applicant to provide in the project description and elsewhere in the
application as appropriate, the official NIH identifier(s) for the hESC
line(s)to be used in the proposed research. Applications that do not provide
this information will be returned without review.
NIH Public Access
Policy:
NIH-funded investigators
are requested to submit to the NIH manuscript submission (NIHMS) system (http://www.nihms.nih.gov) at PubMed Central
(PMC) an electronic version of the author's final manuscript upon acceptance
for publication, resulting from research supported in whole or in part with
direct costs from NIH. The author's final manuscript is defined as the final
version accepted for journal publication, and includes all modifications from
the publishing peer review process.
NIH is requesting that
authors submit manuscripts resulting from 1) currently funded NIH research
projects or 2) previously supported NIH research projects if they are accepted
for publication on or after May 2, 2005. The NIH Public Access Policy applies
to all research grant and career development award mechanisms, cooperative
agreements, contracts, Institutional and Individual Ruth L. Kirschstein
National Research Service Awards, as well as NIH intramural research studies.
The Policy applies to peer-reviewed, original research publications that have
been supported in whole or in part with direct costs from NIH, but it does not
apply to book chapters, editorials, reviews, or conference proceedings.
Publications resulting from non-NIH-supported research projects should not be
submitted.
For more information
about the Policy or the submission process please visit the NIH Public Access
Policy Web site at http://publicaccess.nih.gov/ and
view the Policy or other Resources and Tools including the Authors' Manual (http://publicaccess.nih.gov/publicaccess_Manual.htm).
Standards for Privacy
of Individually Identifiable Health Information:
The Department of Health
and Human Services (DHHS) issued final modification to the "Standards for
Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information", the
"Privacy Rule", on August 14, 2002 . The Privacy Rule is a federal
regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually identifiable health
information, and is administered and enforced by the DHHS Office for Civil
Rights (OCR).
Decisions about applicability and implementation of
the Privacy Rule reside with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR
website (http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/)
provides information on the Privacy Rule, including a complete Regulation Text
and a set of decision tools on "Am I a covered entity?" Information
on the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH processes involving the review,
funding, and progress monitoring of grants, cooperative agreements, and
research contracts can be found at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html.
URLs in NIH Grant
Applications or Appendices:
All applications and
proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page
limitations. Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, Internet
addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide information necessary to the
review because reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites.
Furthermore, we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be compromised when
they directly access an Internet site.
Healthy People 2010:
The Public Health
Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease
prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS-led national
activity for setting priority areas. This PA is related to one or more of the
priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People
2010" at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
Authority and
Regulations:
This program is described in
the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance at http://www.cfda.gov/ and is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive
Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. Awards are made under the authorization
of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241
and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.
All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other
considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The NIH Grants Policy
Statement can be found at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm.
The PHS strongly
encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and
discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227,
the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in
some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education,
library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are
provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and
advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Loan Repayment Programs:
NIH encourages
applications for educational loan repayment from qualified health professionals
who have made a commitment to pursue a research career involving clinical,
pediatric, contraception, infertility, and health disparities related areas. The
LRP is an important component of NIH's efforts to recruit and retain the next
generation of researchers by providing the means for developing a research
career unfettered by the burden of student loan debt. Note that an NIH grant is
not required for eligibility and concurrent career award and LRP applications
are encouraged. The periods of career award and LRP award may overlap providing
the LRP recipient with the required commitment of time and effort, as LRP
awardees must commit at least 50% of their time (at least 20 hours per week
based on a 40 hour week) for two years to the research. For further
information, please see: http://www.lrp.nih.gov.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
![]() |
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
![]() |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
![]() |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
![]() |
||||
Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files. |