Full Text CA-94-015 RESEARCH IN INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES TO REDUCE TOBACCO USE NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 19, May 20, 1994 RFA: CA-94-015 P.T. 34 Keywords: Smoking Behavior Disease Prevention+ National Cancer Institute Letter of Intent Receipt Date: June 29, 1994 Application Receipt Date: September 22, 1994 PURPOSE The Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) invites research grant applications to study strategies to develop, implement, and disseminate effective tobacco control interventions. Tobacco control interventions are those interventions that can influence large populations to reduce tobacco use. These interventions include, but are not necessarily limited to, restrictions on sales of tobacco to minors, restrictions on indoor smoking, increases in tobacco excise taxes, and restrictions on tobacco advertising. The goal of this research is to assist policy makers and public health professionals in the enactment and enforcement of effective tobacco control policy interventions. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This Request for Application (RFA), Research in Innovative Strategies to Reduce Tobacco Use, is related to the priority area of tobacco. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474- 0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report: Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238). ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign, for-profit and non-profit organizations, public and private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government. Applications from minority individuals and women are encouraged. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT This RFA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) individual research project grant (R01) mechanism. Responsibility for the planning, direction, and execution of the proposed project will be solely that of the applicant. The total project period for applications submitted in response to the present RFA may not exceed four years. The anticipated award date is March 1, 1995. Because the nature and scope of the research proposed in response to this RFA may vary, it is anticipated that the size of an award will also vary. This RFA is a one-time solicitation. Future unsolicited competing continuation applications will compete with investigator-initiated applications and be reviewed according to the customary NIH peer review procedures. FUNDS AVAILABLE Approximately $4 million in total costs for four years ($1 million per year for each of four years) will be committed to fund applications submitted in response to this RFA. It is anticipated that three or more new awards will be made, dependent on the receipt of a sufficient number of applications of high scientific merit. Although this program is provided for in the financial plans of the National Cancer Institute, the award of grants pursuant to this RFA is also contingent upon the availability of funds for this purpose. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background Early efforts to reduce the prevalence of cigarette smoking in the U.S. focused on individualized approaches to help adult smokers to stop and on educational programs to prevent youth from starting to smoke. Later research programs also included the use of mass media interventions. In more recent years, interventions have included efforts at altering the environment of smokers and potential smokers, through the use of public and private policies on tobacco use. Such policies can influence the cost of tobacco products, the prevalence of mass media messages that encourage tobacco use, the kinds of places where smoking is allowed, and the ability of youth to purchase tobacco. Policies are often promulgated by legislative bodies at local, state, and national levels. However, regulatory agencies and private corporations also produce important policies on tobacco use. Currently, there is widespread agreement among tobacco control scholars that the most effective intervention programs are comprehensive in nature, and include policy interventions, mass media interventions, and more traditional cessation and prevention services. Many scholars consider policy interventions as perhaps the most effective of these interventions. The impact of increases in cigarette excise taxes has been documented more thoroughly than most other tobacco control policies. The rapid, predictable, and widespread impact of significant increases in excise taxes makes it one of the most effective of tested tobacco control interventions. The impact of clean indoor air policies on cigarette consumption is less definitive. Additional studies may provide more complete information, but there is growing evidence that smoking restrictions may be causally related to reductions in smoking prevalence. The effect of cigarette advertising on cigarette consumption, especially among youth, has recently been examined. Investigations have documented reductions in smoking prevalence in association with restrictions on advertising, bans on smoking, and counter-advertising campaigns. A final area of tobacco control policies that appears to reduce consumption are those policies that effectively restrict the sale of tobacco to minors. In spite of the recognition that legislation and other policies can decrease tobacco use, there remain many questions about the most effective strategies to develop, implement, enforce, and disseminate tobacco control policies. Included among these are questions about barriers to the passage of effective legislation, especially the role of tobacco companies in opposing public health legislation. Only a small number of studies have documented the large-scale and organized efforts to stop policy interventions. Continued documentation of these efforts is critical to refining future policy initiatives. Project Description This program is intended to stimulate innovative behavioral, public health, and economic research on tobacco control policy interventions, including the analysis of their feasibility, effectiveness and consequences of implementation. The results of this research should be useful to policy makers and public health professionals in the enactment and enforcement of effective tobacco control policies. A variety of research questions may be addressed. Investigators are encouraged to discuss more than one research question in their applications and to propose research that will address several such questions. Below are examples of research questions that could be addressed. Tobacco Product Pricing and Taxation o What would be the effect on consumption of very large increases in tobacco product taxes? o What are the consequences of earmarking tobacco product tax revenues for specific programs? o What are the most effective strategies for increasing tobacco excise product taxes? Restrictions on Indoor Smoking o What is the effect of smoking bans in schools on the smoking behavior of students? o What are the most effective strategies for implementing clean indoor air policies? o What strategies facilitate and accelerate compliance with policies that restrict smoking? o What are the economic costs and benefits of ordinances and policies that restrict smoking? Tobacco Product Marketing and Promotion o What is the role of advertising in: recruiting new smokers/users, reducing the cessation rate among current users, and increasing the relapse rate in former smokers/users? o What are the consequences of restricting tobacco advertising, for example, through the removal of billboards near schools or in sports stadiums, or through bans on sponsorship of sporting events? o How are youth, women, and minority populations targeted by tobacco advertising? Access to Tobacco Products o What are the most effective interventions to reduce tobacco sales to minors? o What effects do restrictions on vending machine sales have on youth access to tobacco? o What strategies can be used to increase enforcement of existing laws that ban sales to minors? o What are the effects of penalties directed at retailers, minors, or parents? In selecting topics for this research, applicants must address the possible study results and how these results will help policy makers develop and improve future initiatives. These and other research questions will require a variety of study designs and outcome measures. Outcome measures may include, but are not limited to, measures of smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption, initiation, cessation, and relapse rates, financial information, enactment and enforcement of policies, and changes in knowledge and attitudes about tobacco use and tobacco control policies. While randomized, controlled trials are usually preferred, the nature of these research questions and the realities of policy processes may preclude such a design. In such cases, applicants must clearly justify the choice of their design. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS It is expected that grantees will participate in a series of collaborative meetings at NCI. Although independence and originality are encouraged in the approaches of the various investigators, they are expected to share ideas, experiences, and information in attempting to reach the common goal. Funds should be budgeted to permit travel of senior staff to Bethesda, Maryland twice a year over the course of the grant. Funds awarded for travel to these meetings will be restricted for this purpose only. Failure to participate in these meetings may adversely affect NCI evaluation of the project's progress when the non-competing continuation application for the following year is reviewed. STUDY POPULATIONS INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their subpopulations must be included in all NIH-supported biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects, unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification is provided that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This new policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43) and supersedes and strengthens the previous policies (Concerning the Inclusion of Women in Study Populations, and Concerning the Inclusion of Minorities in Study Populations) which have been in effect since 1990. The new policy contains some new provisions that are substantially different from the 1990 policies. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research," which was reprinted in the Federal Register of March 28, 1994 (59 FR 14508-14513) to correct typesetting errors in the earlier publication,and reprinted in the NIH GUIDE FOR GRANTS AND CONTRACTS of March 18, 1994, Volume 23, Number 11. Investigators may obtain copies from these sources or from the program staff or contact person listed below. Program staff may also provide additional relevant information concerning the policy. LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by June 29, 1994, a letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed research, the name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator, and the number and title of the RFA in response to which the application may be submitted. Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information that it contains allows NCI staff to estimate the potential review workload and to avoid conflict of interest in the review. The letter of intent is to be sent to Dr. Marc Manley at the address listed under INQUIRIES. APPLICATION PROCEDURES The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) is to be used in applying for these grants. These forms are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research; from the Office of Grants Information, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, 5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone 301/710-0267; and from the NIH program administrator listed under INQUIRIES. The RFA label available in the PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the application. Failure to use this label could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. In addition, the RFA title and number must be typed on line 2a of the face page of the application form and the YES box must be marked. Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the Checklist, and three signed, photocopies, in one package to: Division of Research Grants National Institute of Health Westwood Building, Room 240 Bethesda, MD 20892** At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application must also be sent to: Ms. Toby Friedberg Referral Office Division of Extramural Activities National Cancer Institute Executive Plaza North, Room 636 Bethesda, MD 20892 Applications must be received by September 22, 1994. If an application is received after that date, it will be returned to the applicant without review. The Division of Research Grants (DRG) will not accept any application in response to this announcement that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. The DRG will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed. This does not preclude the submission of substantial revisions of applications already reviewed, but such applications must include an introduction addressing the previous critique. No addenda or appendix materials will be accepted after the receipt date unless requested by the Scientific Review Administrator. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by DRG and responsiveness by the NCI. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. If the application is not responsive to the RFA, NCI staff will contact the applicant to determine whether to return the application to the applicant or submit it for review in competition with unsolicited applications at the next review cycle. Applications that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened by the NCI in accordance with the review criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, a process (triage) may be used by the initial review group in which applications will be determined to be competitive or non-competitive based on their scientific merit relative to other applications received in response to the RFA. Applications judged to be competitive will be discussed and be assigned a priority score. Applications determined to be non-competitive will be withdrawn from further consideration and the Principal Investigator and the official signing for the applicant organization will be notified. The second level of review will be provided by the National Cancer Advisory Board. Review Criteria o The extent to which the proposed research will meet the goal of the RFA. o The extent to which the proposed research will meet the project goal to better understand strategies to develop, implement, and disseminate effective tobacco control policy interventions. o Scientific significance and originality of the proposed research. o Appropriateness and adequacy of the methodology proposed to carry out the research. o Availability of resources and facilities to perform the proposed research. o Qualifications and experience of the Principal Investigator and staff. o Documented support for the project from participating agencies and organizations, if any, including previous relationships and relevant experience in conducting other collaborative efforts, as well as a clear delineation of each agency's responsibilities for the project. o Appropriateness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to the proposed research. AWARD CRITERIA The anticipated date of award is July 1, 1995. Awards will be made based on the following criteria: priority score, availability of funds, and programmatic priorities. INQUIRIES Written and telephone inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues and address the letter of intent to: Marc Manley, M.D., M.P.H Division of Cancer Prevention and Control National Cancer Institute Executive Plaza North, Room 233 Bethesda, MD 20893 Telephone: (301) 496-8584 FAX: (301) 496-8675 Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Marci Bollt Grants Administration Branch National Cancer Institute Executive Plaza South, Room 243 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-7800 AUTHORITIES AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.339. Awards are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Title IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42 USC 241 and 285) and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52, 45 CFR Part 74, and 45 CFR Part 92. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. The Public Health Service (PHS) strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people. .
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||||