RELEASE DATE:  April 23, 2004

RFA:  RFA-AI-04-017 (This RFA has been reissued as RFA-AI-09-010. Also see amendment NOT-AI-04-030)

EXPIRATION DATE:  October 14, 2004

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) 

National Institutes of Health (NIH) 

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 

No. 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research
No. 93.855, Immunology, Allergy, and Transplantation Research



o Purpose of this RFA
o Research Objectives
o Mechanism(s) of Support 
o Funds Available
o Eligible Institutions
o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators
o Special Requirements 
o Where to Send Inquiries
o Letter of Intent
o Submitting an Application
o Peer Review Process
o Review Criteria
o Receipt and Review Schedule
o Award Criteria
o Required Federal Citations


Diseases caused by tropical parasites are a global health problem 
disproportionately affecting populations residing in less developed 
countries.  The tropical infectious diseases research program of the National 
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is predicated on the 
view that we live in a global community and, therefore, the health problems 
of the United States cannot be separated from those of the rest of the world.  
NIAID’s ultimate goal in this research area is attainment of the highest 
standard of health for a greater proportion of the global health community 
through the development of new and improved vaccines, diagnostics, and 
treatments.  Fulfillment of NIAID’s commitment to tropical infectious 
diseases requires the capacity to carry out research in endemic areas. 

The goals of the NIAID International Collaborations in Infectious Disease 
Research (ICIDR) program are to: support high-quality, collaborative research 
that will lead to or result in prevention, amelioration, and/or improved 
treatment of tropical infectious diseases caused by protozoa and helminth 
parasites; increase relevant research experience for both U.S. and foreign 
investigators; and facilitate and enhance scientific linkages between U.S. 
and foreign investigators to enhance the independent research capacity of the 
collaborating foreign institutions and strengthen their scientific 
infrastructure for further international collaborative arrangements.  NIAID 
seeks to support research that will result in scientifically sound 
information that can guide relevant clinical and public health policy in 
endemic countries.



Diseases caused by protozoan and helminth parasites affect billions of people 
and result in the death and disability of millions annually.  One out of ten 
persons worldwide is infected with one or more of the five major tropical 
parasitic diseases - malaria, schistosomiasis, filariasis, trypanosomiasis, 
and leishmaniasis.  Children are disproportionately affected by these 
infections due to their immature immune systems and overlapping malnutrition. 
The impact of parasitic diseases is often cited as a key impediment to 
further social and economic progress.  No effective vaccines have been 
identified for any human parasitic diseases and many existing therapeutics 
for parasitic diseases are toxic and only partially effective.  Very few new 
therapeutics have been developed in recent years for parasitic infections.  
Therefore, the challenges of parasitic infections continue to outpace 
solutions.  Previous methods of control and treatment of malaria are no 
longer effective due, in part, to the emergence and spread of drug 
resistance.  As a result, mortality for malaria is over one million deaths 
per year.  Furthermore, it is estimated that more than 300 million people 
suffer from severe disease associated with schistosomiasis and soil-
transmitted helminth infections.

To confront the challenges in international health more effectively, NIAID 
established the International Centers for Tropical Disease Research (ICTDR) 
network in 1991.  Since 1991, all ICIDRs have been part of the NIAID ICTDR 
network.  This network incorporates Institute-supported intramural and 
extramural tropical disease research centers into a cooperative research 
program on tropical infectious disease problems.  The ICTDR network stresses 
an interactive approach, emphasizing the development of partnerships between 
domestic and foreign scientists in order to enhance transfer of modern 
technology to institutions in endemic areas and increase opportunities for 
U.S. scientists to work in endemic areas; between NIAID and other U.S. 
government, private, and international agencies with interests in tropical 
disease research in order to most effectively utilize available resources; 
and between individual investigators, funding organizations, and industry in 
order to encourage the relevant application of recent scientific advances 
toward critical issues of international health.

Objective and Scope 

This RFA invites applications for collaborative research focused on parasitic 
infectious diseases in endemic areas that disproportionately affect the 
health of people living in the tropics.  The ICIDR program is intended to 
support research requiring access to populations of infected human and other 
mammalian hosts, parasites, and vectors that are limited or unavailable in 
the U.S. and other developed countries.  Therefore, the majority of research 
supported under the ICIDR program must be conducted at endemic foreign sites 
with an emphasis on field and clinical studies.  A non-U.S. co-investigator 
at the foreign site will serve as a Major Foreign Collaborator (MFC).  The 
MFC should have an appointment at the foreign institution. The U.S. Principal 
Investigator must collaborate with the MFC in the design, implementation, 
monitoring, and administrative management of the research projects.  The 
research should not be limited to sample collection for detailed sample 
evaluation in developed countries.  In addition, support will not be provided 
for research that can be conducted in the U.S. or in U.S.-based laboratories.

All applications must be focused on a single pathogen or disease entity.  
Both single and multi-project research programs will be supported under this 
RFA.  Multi-project applications must propose at least two interrelated 
projects focused around a central theme.  Multi-project applications 
submitted in response to this RFA must include an interventional component 
which is defined as experimental studies in clinical or field situations to 
investigate the safety and/or efficacy of a drug, vaccine, or vector control 
strategy.  Multi-project applications must have at least two cores: an 
administrative core and a data management/biostatistical core.  In addition, 
multi-project applications may propose one or more scientific cores to serve 
as a central resource for two or more of the proposed research projects.  
Additional information on multi-project cores is provided under “Special 
Requirements” below.  

Research areas relevant to this RFA include studies of epidemiology, natural 
history, pathogenesis, interventional studies including Phase I, II and III 
preventive and therapeutic clinical trials, and vector control.  
Multidisciplinary collaborations are encouraged to ensure the appropriate 
breadth of scientific expertise in contributing fields, including but not 
limited to infectious diseases, biochemistry, immunology, genetics, 
pharmacology, molecular biology, microbiology, zoology, nutrition, and 
medical entomology.  Studies focused solely on HIV or the impact of HIV 
infection on other tropical diseases, as well as studies of non-parasitic 
infections in developing countries are supported by other NIAID activities 
and will not be considered responsive to this solicitation.


This RFA will use the NIH multi-project cooperative agreement (U19) and 
single project cooperative agreement (U01), "assistance" mechanisms, rather 
than "acquisition" mechanisms in which substantial NIH scientific and/or 
programmatic involvement with the awardee is anticipated during the 
performance of the activity.  This RFA is a one-time solicitation. Future 
unsolicited, competing-continuation applications based on this program will 
compete with all investigator-initiated applications and will be reviewed 
according to the customary peer review procedures. The anticipated award date 
is July, 2005. Applications that are not funded in the competition described 
in this RFA may be resubmitted as NEW investigator-initiated applications 
using the standard receipt dates for NEW applications described in the 
instructions to the PHS 398 application 

The NIH U19 and U01 are cooperative agreement award mechanisms in which the 
Principal Investigator retains the primary responsibility and dominant role 
for planning, directing, and executing the proposed project, with NIH staff 
being substantially involved as a partner with the Principal Investigator, as 
described under the section "Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of 

The total project period for applications submitted in response to this RFA 
may not exceed five years.

This RFA uses just-in-time concepts.

NIAID intends to commit approximately $7.5 million in FY 2005 to fund 8 to 12 
new and/or competitive continuation grants in response to this RFA.  An 
applicant may request a project period of up to five years and a budget for 
direct costs of up to $400,000 per year for single component applications and 
up to $800,000 per year for multi-project applications.  Because the nature 
and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application, 
it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary.  
Although the financial plans of NIAID provide support for this program, 
awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the availability of funds and 
the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications. 

At this time, the NIAID has not determined whether or how this solicitation 
will be continued beyond the present RFA.  


The following may submit an application: 

o Domestic for-profit or non-profit organizations 
o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, 
and laboratories 
o Faith-based or community-based organizations

Foreign institutions are not eligible to apply as the primary awardee 


Any U.S.-based individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary 
to carry out the proposed research is invited to work with their institution 
to develop an application for support.  Individuals from underrepresented 
racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always 
encouraged to apply for NIH programs.


1.  Overall Research Goals and Objectives, and Strategic Plan

The application must identify and describe overall goals and objectives of 
the ICIDR, the potential importance of the proposed research to the health 
and well being of the population in the endemic country, the ICIDR 
organization, the participating institutions, and the role of all consortium 
members.  The application should include a strategic plan for strengthening 
research capacity at the endemic site and disseminating research findings to 
host country health leaders.  The strategic plan should include an outcome 
evaluation plan for capacity building and research and training objectives.  
The following areas should be included in the strategic plan:

o Strengths - Identify and describe the strengths of the proposed consortium 
including a brief summary of the research and development experience and 
expertise of ICIDR participants, as well as the current facilities and other 
research resources available.  Identify and evaluate the potential 
opportunities to establish high quality research, and the capacity of the 
host country research team to function independently through the ICIDR 
collaboration. Discuss how collaborations with endemic institutions will be 
further developed and target opportunities that will address the goals of the 
NIAID tropical disease research program and how the specific project(s) will 
enhance clinical research capacity at the host site e.g. laboratory and/or 
clinical infrastructure.

o Research Focus - The intent of the ICIDR Program is to support research 
with potential to significantly improve the health and well being of 
individuals living in tropical countries.  Describe how the proposed research 
might translate into improved disease control, vaccines, therapeutics and/or 
diagnostics. The application should state how the research may potentially 
impact on future public health policy.  

o Structure - Provide a detailed plan for the organizational structure, lines 
of authority and communications, and staffing of the proposed ICIDR.  This 
includes:  (1) an organizational diagram showing the various ICIDR 
participating institutions, projects, and proposed staffing for scientific, 
technical and administrative functions; (2) a narrative description of the 
roles and responsibilities of all scientific and administrative staff and 
their level of effort; and (3) a narrative description of plans and 
procedures for ensuring adequate coordination among participating 
institutions and personnel, with special emphasis on data sharing, 
publication agreements and publication goals.

2. Research Plan

Applicants must provide a detailed description of the proposed research 
project(s), including:  (1) the pathogen or disease entity proposed for 
study; (2) the research question(s) to be addressed and a description of the 
facilities available as needed for the proposed research projects; (3) the 
proposed methodology; (4) where appropriate, the study population, 
documentation of access to necessary patients and/or samples, and plans for 
the recruitment and retention of study participants; (5) quality control and 
analysis plans; and (6) training as required by investigators and field staff 
to conduct research.  The Research Plan must also include the proposed 
timelines for the planning, implementation, conduct and completion of 
research projects.

In addition, all projects proposing clinical studies must include a brief 
concept proposal for each clinical study, detailing the following aspects of 
the proposed clinical research:

Study Title
Hypothesis to be tested
Study objectives
Clinical sites     
Intervention and comparators (if any)  
Regimen (if any)
Study design (not all parts may be relevant)
     Eligibility/exclusion criteria
     Randomization/stratification plan
     Number of subjects
     Anticipated duration of recruitment phase
     Total study duration
     Interim study progress and safety monitoring plan, if applicable
     Primary endpoints/outcomes
     Secondary endpoints/outcomes
     Study visit schedule and primary evaluations (including laboratory 
     Sample size justification
Any proposed sub-studies
Data analyses planned

3. Collaborative Arrangements and Capacity Building 

The domestic applicant institution is responsible for developing an 
affiliation(s) with an established institution(s) (e.g., university, research 
institute, federal or state health department, hospital) in the tropical host 
country.  ICIDR research activities conducted at the foreign affiliate must 
be supported under a consortium agreement made with the U.S.-based 
institution.  The U.S. Principal Investigator must designate one MFC from the 
foreign institution(s) to serve as the co-investigator and provide 
documentation of an off-site component as the foreign base of operations.  
Proposed research projects must be acceptable to the collaborating foreign 
investigators and their institutions.  A countersigned letter of intent from 
the foreign institution documenting off-site components and investigators 
must be included in the application.  Applications that do not provide such 
documentation will be considered unresponsive and will not be reviewed.  

In addition, it may be necessary to establish a working agreement with the 
government of the host country to expedite exchange of personnel, equipment 
and supplies from the U.S. to the off-site facility, and to provide assurance 
that study data can be exported for public use.  The agreement may be 
developed directly between the domestic applicant institution and the 
representatives of the foreign government, or it may be more convenient for 
the domestic institution to arrange such an agreement through a regional 
organization, such as the Pan American Health Organization or the relevant 
office of the World Health Organization.

4.  Percent Effort of ICIDR Personnel

It is expected that ICIDR scientists from the U.S. institution will travel to 
the foreign affiliate for long-term collaborations with the resident 
scientists.  It is anticipated that the Principal Investigator will spend up 
to 2 months per year at the foreign site.  Other U.S. ICIDR investigators are 
expected to spend longer periods of time at the foreign site.  The Principal 
Investigator for single-project ICIDRs must expend at least 20% effort on the 
ICIDR program.  It is anticipated that the demands of multi-project ICIDR 
programs will require even greater effort on the part of the Principal 
Investigator.  The MFC must be substantially involved in the project, 
committing at least 40% effort for single projects and a higher level of 
effort for multi-project programs.  Each ICIDR must have a designated 
biostatistician and data manager; multi-project programs must have a core 
designated for these functions. The biostatistician must expend no less than 
5% effort for single projects and 10% effort for multi-project programs.  A 
full-time data manager is required at the endemic site for both U01s and 

5.  Administration/Administrative Core

It is expected that there will be both a domestic and a foreign 
administrative structure with intentional transfer of administrative capacity 
to the foreign site.  The Principal Investigator and the MFC are responsible 
for administration of the ICIDR program.  A well-developed administrative 
plan is integral to the ICIDR success, and must be clearly defined in the 
application.  The plan should include discussion of the structure and roles 
of administrative staff including:  the training and experience of proposed 
staff; the functions to be performed; the plans for the transfer of 
administrative capacity to the foreign site; and the time frame within which 
such responsibilities will be transferred to the foreign site.  For multi-
project U19 applications, an administrative core must be included.  This 
administrative core is responsible for managing, coordinating, and 
supervising the entire range of ICIDR activities, monitoring progress, and 
ensuring the strategic plan is implemented effectively and within proposed 
timelines.  This administrative core should clearly identify personnel and 
resources needed to oversee the overall program.  The description must 
provide a clear and explicit discussion of how fiscal and other resources 
will be allocated and prioritized, how communications throughout the ICIDR 
will be facilitated, and how research- related travel will be organized and 

In the proposed budget, both single-project (U01) and multi-project (U19) 
applications must include funding for overall administrative staff and 
services, expenses for publications for collaborative efforts, communication 
expenses, travel, as well as administrative capacity building at the foreign 
institution to meet reporting and oversight requirements of the program.

6.  Data Management and Biostatistical Component/Core 

A data management system, managed by the MFC, and a full-time data manager 
must be present at the foreign site.  Applications must provide a detailed 
description of the existing or planned data management system.  The data 
management system should ideally include: security features for controlled 
access to project data; a tracking system for data forms and activities; 
double data entry of data forms; date and time of stamping of all data 
records with electronic signatures; and audit trails to track all changes 
made to data records.  In addition, it is expected that U.S. and foreign 
staff will collaborate on the design, development and testing of databases 
and data management software, training of data management and field personnel 
on data collection activities, maintenance of the database and software 
systems, documentation of changes, and preparation of standard operating 
procedures for all aspects of data management.  Applications must also 
address how such a collaborative onsite approach will be planned and 
implemented, as well as the time frame within which all design, development, 
testing and training activities will take place to achieve a fully 
operational data management system and appropriately trained staff.   
Applicants with inadequate data systems and data management support currently 
in place should budget at least $50,000 each year in the first two years of 
the program to ensure development of robust and comprehensive data management 
systems and for related training needs.  It is recommended that data 
management systems for clinical trials be developed using FDA guidelines on 
electronic records issued in 21 CFR part 11 

Biostatistical support is required for assisting with protocol design, 
development and analysis.  This support should provide for activities such as 
developing randomization procedures, developing stopping rules, monitoring 
study progress, and analyzing interim and final study results.  For clinical 
trials that require Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) oversight, 
biostatistical support will include analytical plans, DSMB reports, and the 
preparation of responses to DSMB requests.  A designated biostatistician must 
expend no less than 5% effort for single projects and 10% effort for multi-
project programs.  

U19 multi-project applications must include the data management and 
biostatistical support requirements in a separate core.

7.  Meetings 

An ICIDR Executive Committee (IEC), comprised of the ICIDR Principal 
Investigators and the NIAID Program Officers, will be formed to address the 
need for communication, collaboration, and flexibility to meet emerging 
research challenges within the ICIDR and the ICTDR programs, as well as 
within the tropical medicine research community.  The IEC will have primary 
responsibility for identification of emerging research projects for support 
from the ICIDR Opportunity Pool (see below) and assisting with the planning 
of an annual ICTDR meeting.

The initial meeting of the IEC, to be convened by NIAID, will be held within 
six (6) months of award.  The IEC will meet twice annually thereafter, once 
at the annual ICTDR meeting and one additional meeting that may be scheduled 
around the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene annual meeting.  
Meeting budget requests should include funds for travel by the ICIDR 
Principal Investigator to two IEC meetings per year including the ICTDR 
meeting; and travel for the MFC, and one or two additional ICIDR staff, if 
needed, to the annual ICTDR meetings.  

8.  Opportunity Pool

The NIAID has established an ICIDR Opportunity Pool 
( to respond to unanticipated 
scientific needs and opportunities in tropical medicine in order to enhance 
translation from basic research to field research and site-to-site 
collaboration.  Scientific needs and opportunities eligible for support by 
the ICIDR Opportunity Pool include, but are not limited to, research-oriented 
investigations of anticipated or unanticipated outbreaks of infectious 
diseases, evaluation of new diagnostics or therapeutics, and pilot studies. 
It is anticipated that the research supported under this Opportunity Pool 
would produce scientific advances as a result of multi-site cooperation and 
collaboration. ICIDR Opportunity Pool proposals are not part of the ICIDR 
application.  Therefore, budgets for Opportunity Pool funds should not be 
included in the ICIDR application.  At the initial IEC meeting, one of the 
awardees will be selected by the IEC to manage the Opportunity Pool funds.  
The IEC will be responsible for the administration and scientific review of 
Opportunity Pool proposals once the ICIDR awards are made.

9.  Pathogen Study Groups

Pathogen Study Groups (PSGs) focused on a specific pathogen or disease entity 
and Interest Groups (IG) focused on research approaches will be established 
or continued by ICIDR investigators and the NIAID Program staff.  
Responsibilities of these groups will include:  facilitation of information 
exchange including research advances; fostering collaboration and 
translational research; coordination of activities to minimize duplication; 
and identification of emerging research opportunities.  The PSGs may be 
comprised of ICIDR investigators, other investigators participating in the 
ICTDR network, other members of the NIAID-supported research community, 
international organizations such as WHO, trainees supported by the NIH 
Fogarty International Center, and other interested participants.  Each PSG or 
IG will be responsible for electing a chairperson who will work with NIAID 
Program Staff to organize communication and activities.  Each applicant must 
budget $15,000 per year for PSG or IG activities such as conference calls, 
internet connectivity, attending special training courses or workshops, and 
organizing interest group meetings.  Support for this activity should be 
included in the administrative budget.


The following terms and conditions will be incorporated into the award 
statement and provided to the Principal Investigator as well as the 
institutional official at the time of award.

These special Terms of Award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, 
otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS Grant Administration 
Regulations at 45 CFR part 74 and 92, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH Grant 
Administration policy statements.

The administrative and funding instruments used for this program are the 
single project (U01) and multiproject (U19) cooperative agreements, 
"assistance", rather than "acquisition", mechanisms, in which substantial NIH 
scientific and/or programmatic involvement with the awardee is anticipated 
during the performance of the activity. Under the cooperative agreement, the 
NIH purpose is to support and/or stimulate the recipient's activity by 
involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipient in a 
partner role, but it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a 
dominant role in the activity. Consistent with this concept, the dominant 
role and prime responsibility for the activity resides with the awardees for 
the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities in carrying 
out the research will be shared among the awardees, and the NIAID Program 

1.  Monitoring Clinical Studies

When clinical studies or trials are a component of the research proposed, 
NIAID policy requires that studies be monitored commensurate with the degree 
of potential risk to study subjects and the complexity of the study.  An 
Updated NIAID policy was published in the NIH Guide on July 8, 2002 and is 
available at
The full policy, including terms and conditions of award, is 
available at; Guidance for 
Compliance with NIAID Clinical Terms of Award at; and the DMID Policies 
and Guidance for Data and Safety Monitoring at

Award of a cooperative agreement does not constitute approval for initiation 
of human subjects research.  ICIDR investigators will be required to develop 
and conduct all studies involving human subjects using Good Clinical Practice 
Standards as defined and published by the International Conference on 
Harmonization (ICH) and adopted by the FDA (Federal Register Vol.62 No. 90 
(5/9/97) (

Prior to study initiation, NIAID staff will review all studies involving 
human subjects at two stages.  The first stage will be a review of the 
research concept and the second review will be during protocol development.  
Both stages will be reviewed for scientific content, design, safety, 
feasibility, statistical, and regulatory compliance.  Use of the NIAID 
protocol template, found at the International Clinical Studies Support Center 
website (, is encouraged.

All ICIDR protocol documents for interventional studies should include the 
ICH protocol requirements outlined in part 6 of the ICH Harmonized Tripartite 
Guideline for Good Clinical Practice website  or at

2.  Awardee Rights and Responsibilities

Awardees will have primary responsibility for collaborating with the foreign 
sites; for defining the research objectives, approaches and details of the 
projects within the guidelines of the RFA; and for performing the scientific 
activity. Specifically, awardees have primary responsibility to: 

o Develop affiliations with one or more established institutions in the 
tropical host country (e.g., university, research institute, federal or state 
health department, hospital).  ICIDR research activities conducted at foreign 
sites must be supported under a consortium agreement between the tropical 
host country/institution(s) and the U.S. institution 
Signed copies of the consortium agreements should be submitted to 
NIAID Grants Management Staff and Program Staff within 60 days after the 
issue date of the Notice of Grant Award.

o Maintain a mutually acceptable arrangement with the host country affiliate 
institution(s) and any relevant governmental agencies.  This includes 
communicating with and seeking required approvals, and complying with all 
requirements of regulatory and health governmental agencies in the host 
country.  Where applicable, procedures must be established for all 
participating institutions to comply with FDA regulations for studies 
involving investigational agents, and to comply with the requirements of 45 
CFR Part 46 for the protection of human subjects.

o Develop protocols that clearly state the rationale, objectives and methods 
for proposed research projects.  This includes the definition of objectives 
and approaches, planning, implementation, participant recruitment and follow-
up, data collection, quality control, interim data and safety monitoring, 
final data analysis and interpretation, and publication of results. Study 
protocols should be reviewed and endorsed by all participating investigators 
prior to submission to NIAID.

o Submit for approval final protocols, informed consent documents, relevant 
procedure manuals and all required amendments to the NIAID Program Officer, 
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at all participating institutions as per 
the Office of Human Research Protection (OHRP) guidelines, and all relevant 
regulatory agencies.  

o Provide for quality assurance/quality control, data management, drug 
distribution and drug accountability (pharmacy plans), and appropriate 
laboratory procedures and standards. The Principal Investigator will provide 
and document necessary training for clinical research staff in protection of 
human subjects training as required by NIH policy
, Good Clinical Practices, regulatory adherence, protocol specific 
procedures, and other training as needed, e.g., for trial-related medical 
management issues prior to initiation of the study.

o Establish a statistical and data management capacity, and when required, 
prepare statistical reports for DSMBs.  The requirements, criteria, and 
procedures for serious adverse events (SAE) reporting and any other types of 
study safety monitoring reporting as determined by NIAID must be followed for 
each study.

o Cooperate with the NIAID Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 
(DMID) clinical site monitoring contractor and other federally supported site 
monitoring staff or regulatory auditors who will inspect records to ensure 
compliance with all federal regulations, Good Clinical Practice, accurate 
protocol implementation, internal quality management, NIH policies on patient 
safety, and quality management and data completeness and accuracy.  Typical 
visits will consist of the monitoring of protocol adherence, review of the 
regulatory file, review of case report forms and source documents, review of 
internal quality management plans, and audit pharmacies for care and 
accountability of investigational products.  The Principal Investigator will 
be responsible for the response to monitor findings.

o Ensure the accurate and timely assessment of the progress of research.  
This includes, but is not limited to, the development of adequate internal 
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) procedures for data collection and 
management and laboratory performance, ensuring adequate supervision at all 
field sites, laboratories, and data facilities, and generation of periodic 
reports addressing study conduct quality and progress. 

o Cooperate in the reporting of the study findings.  It is specifically 
intended that publications resulting from collaborative research will be 
primary authored and/or co-authored by involved foreign scientists(s) and 
that the data will be made readily available to the government of the host 
country.  The NIAID will have access to and may periodically review all data 
generated under an award.  NIH policies governing possible co-authorship of 
publications with NIAID staff will apply in all cases.  Publications or oral 
presentation of work done under this award will require appropriate 
acknowledgement of NIAID/DHHS support. 

o Domestic and Foreign Opportunity Pool Funds. The manager of the ICIDR 
Opportunity Pool must include in his/her annual progress report a listing of 
the recipients of the pool funds, the awarded amount, the time period, and a 
brief statement of progress submitted to NIAID Grants Management and Program 
Staff.  Recipients of ICIDR Opportunity Pool funds should also include a 
statement detailing the progress in their annual report submitted to NIAID 
Grants Management Staff and Program Staff.

o Foreign Opportunity Pool Funds.  For Foreign Opportunity Pool Funds 
(approved by the IEC) involving international studies, the awardee 
institution must submit a copy of the application to NIAID Grants Management 
and Program Staff prior to obtaining support.  No funds may be provided for 
projects involving foreign sites unless specifically indicated on a revised 
Notice of Grant Award.

o Provide NIAID with all the necessary information and documentation for 
filing the IND application with the FDA when NIAID holds the IND, amend after 
comments are provided by the Program Officer, local IRB, and regulatory 
authorities, and submit safety reports and annual IND reports.

3.  NIAID Program Responsibilities

NIAID staff assistance will be provided by a Program Officer who will serve 
as NIAID's Scientific Coordinator. The NIAID Scientific Coordinator will have 
substantial scientific/programmatic involvement during the conduct of this 
activity through technical assistance, advice and coordination above and 
beyond normal program stewardship for grants, as described below.

During performance of the award, the NIAID Scientific Coordinator, with 
assistance from other scientific program staff who are designated based on 
the research topic and their relevant expertise, may provide appropriate 
assistance, advice, and guidance by participating in the design of the 
activities; by advising in the selection of sources or resources (e.g., 
determining where a particular reagent can be found); by coordinating or 
participating in the collection and/or analysis of data; by advising in 
management and technical performance; or by participating in the preparation 
of publications. The NIAID Scientific Coordinator will serve as a 
liaison/facilitator between the awardee, pharmaceutical and biotech 
industries, and other government agencies (e.g., FDA, USDA, CDC) and will 
serve as a resource of scientific and policy information related to the goals 
of the awardee's research. However, the role of NIAID will be to facilitate 
and not to direct the activities. It is anticipated that decisions in all 
activities will be reached by consensus and the NIAID staff will be given the 
opportunity to offer input into this process. The manner of reaching this 
consensus and the final decision-making authority will rest with the 
Principal Investigator.

o Provide substantial assistance in the design and conduct of research 
activities, including advice on the design, development, and technical 
performance of clinical protocols and statistical evaluations of data; and 
access to and use of reagents, assays, and other resources available through 
NIAID contractors and awardees, as appropriate. For interventional studies, 
NIAID Program Staff are responsible for coordinating with DMID’s Office of 
Regulatory Affairs (ORA) for advice and assistance in meeting FDA 
requirements for investigational agents.

o Coordinate protocol review and consent review using standard NIAID 
procedures.  The NIAID Program Officer will return comments and 
recommendations to the Principal Investigators in a timely manner.

o Make decisions regarding the need for a U.S. FDA IND, and who would hold 
the IND when needed. 

o Receive and review all reports of adverse events and serious adverse 

o Review progress and make recommendations for continued funding based on a 
review of annual and periodic reports on progress, findings, and future 
plans; periodic site visits for discussions with research teams; observation 
of field data collection and management, quality control, fiscal review, and 
other relevant matters; publications; study subject and/or data accrual; 
cooperation in carrying out the research; and/or maintenance of a high 
quality of research.

o Provide for clinical site monitoring contractors or regulatory auditors to 
make site visits and assessments at endemic sites when deemed necessary, to 
ensure site capacity and evaluate progress of the proposed research.

o Determine whether it is necessary to terminate an ongoing study for any of 
a number of reasons which include, but are not limited to, risk to subject 
safety; the scientific question is no longer relevant or the objectives will 
not be met; failure to comply with Good Clinical Practices, applicable 
federal regulations, or Terms of Award; occurrence of unforeseen drug safety 
issues or data from preclinical studies indicate a presence of unanticipated 
toxicity; risks that cannot be adequately quantified; ethical concerns raised 
by the local community or local medical care/health care authorities; failure 
to remedy deficiencies identified by site monitoring teams; substandard data; 
inadequate progress in fulfilling the research plan; or successful completion 
of study not feasible with prevailing accrual rates.  

o Assist, where warranted, in data analyses and interpretation, and the 
dissemination of study findings to the research community and health care 
recipients, including co-authorship of the publication of results of studies 
conducted by the ICIDRs, subject to NIH publication policies.

o Phase III and selected Phase II interventional studies will be monitored by 
a DSMB, to be selected and overseen by NIAID staff (see DMID Policies and 
Guidance for Data and Safety Monitoring  All Phase I and II 
interventional studies will be monitored by interim monitoring boards that 
will be established jointly by NIAID program staff, the ICIDR Executive 
Committee, and the Principal Investigator.

4.  Collaborative Responsibilities 

In addition to the interactions defined above, awardees and NIAID staff shall 
share responsibilities for the scientific coordination and communication of 
the ICIDR network through the IEC, PSGs, and IGs. In the event that 
opportunities arise and funds become available for multi-center research 
studies, the IEC will work with the relevant PSG to develop common protocol, 
manuals, questionnaires, data sharing, analysis, and publications.  

5.  Arbitration

Any disagreement that may arise on scientific/programmatic matters (within 
the scope of the award) between award recipients and NIAID may be brought to 
arbitration. An arbitration panel will be composed of three members – one 
chosen by the awardee, a second member selected by NIAID, and the third 
member selected by the two prior selected members. This special arbitration 
procedure in no way affects the awardee's right to appeal an adverse action 
that is otherwise appealable in accordance with the PHS regulations at 42 CFR 
Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulation at 45 CFR Part 16.

These special Terms of Award are in addition to and not in lieu of otherwise 
applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS Grant Administration 
Regulations at 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH Grant 
Administration policy statements


We encourage inquiries concerning this RFA and welcome the opportunity to 
answer questions from potential applicants.  Inquiries may fall into three 
areas:  scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management 

o Direct questions about scientific/research issues to:

Elizabeth S. Higgs, MD, DTMH, MIA
Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Room 5067, MSC-6604
6610 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892-6603 
Telephone: 301-402-8372 
FAX: 301-402-0659 

Malla R. Rao, DrPH, M.Eng
Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, DHHS
Room 5095, MSC-6604
6610 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: 301- 451-3749
FAX: 301-402-0659

o Direct questions about peer review issues to: 

Gary Madonna 
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Room 3135, MSC-7616
6700-B Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616
Telephone: 301-496-3528
FAX: 301-402-2638 

o Direct questions about financial or grants management matters to:

Donna R. Sullivan
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Room Number 2232, MSC-7614
6700-B Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892-7614
Telephone: 301-594-6361
FAX: 301-480-3780 


Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes 
the following information:

o Descriptive title of the proposed research
o Name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator
o Names of other key personnel 
o Participating institutions
o Number and title of this RFA 

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not 
enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it 
contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan 
the review.

The letter of intent is to be sent by the date listed at the beginning of 
this document.  The letter of intent should be sent to:

Gary Madonna
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Room 3135, MSC-7616
6700-B Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616
Telephone: 301-496-3528
FAX: 301-402-2638 


Applicants for U19 grants must follow special application guidelines in the 
AWARDS; this brochure is available via the WWW at: 

Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant application 
instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001).  Applications must have a DUN and 
Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number as the 
Universal Identifier when applying for Federal grants or cooperative 
agreements. The DUNS number can be obtained by calling (866) 705-5711 or 
through the web site at The DUNS number 
should be entered on line 11 of the face page of the PHS 398 form.  The PHS 
398 document is available at in an interactive 
format.  For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone (301) 710-0267, 

USING THE RFA LABEL: The RFA label available in the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001) 
application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the 
application.  Type the RFA number on the label.  Failure to use this label 
could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not 
reach the review committee in time for review.  In addition, the RFA title 
and number must be typed on line 2 of the face page of the application form 
and the YES box must be marked. The RFA label is also available at:

SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH : Submit a signed, typewritten original of 
the application, including the Checklist, and three signed, photocopies, in 
one package to:

Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD  20892-7710
Bethesda, MD  20817 (for express/courier service)

At the time of submission, two additional exact copies of the grant 
application and all five sets of any appendix material must be sent to:

Gary Madonna
Division of Extramural Activities
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Room 3135, MSC-7616
6700-B Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616
Telephone: 301-496-3528
FAX: 301-402-2638 

Applications that are not received as a single package on or before the 
October 13, 2004 or that do not conform to the instructions contained in PHS 
398 (rev. 5/01) Application Kit (as modified in, and superseded by, the NIAID 
will be judged non-responsive and will be returned to the applicant. 

It is highly recommended that the appropriate NIAID program contact be 
consulted before submitting the letter of intent and during the early stages 
of preparation of the application.  (See program contact under INQUIRIES).


(See also the SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS section above for additional application 
instructions and requirements.)

Applicants for U19 grants must follow special application guidelines in the 
AWARDS; this brochure is available via the WWW at  This brochure presents 
specific instructions for sections of the PHS 398 (rev. 5/01) application 
form that should be completed differently than usual.  For all other items in 
the application, follow the usual instructions in the PHS 398.

U01 Single Project Applications 

For this initiative, the overall page limit for Sections a-d of the Research 
Plan is increased from the normal 25 page limit of the PHS 398 to a total of 
35 pages to accommodate the special requirements listed below: 

a. Specific Aims 
b. Background and Significance 
    o Overall Research Goals and Objectives, and Strategic Plan
    o Collaborative Arrangements and Capacity Building
    o Administrative requirements
c. Preliminary Studies/Progress Report 
d. Research Design and Methods 
o Research Plan
o Concept Proposal for Clinical Studies (5 pages recommended) 
o Data Management and Biostatistical support requirements

U19 Multi-Project Applications

The Overall Research Goals and Objectives, and Strategic Plan and the 
Collaborative Arrangements and Capacity Building sections should be included 
in the overview of the application.  
Sections a-d of each individual project should not exceed 30 pages.  This 
increases the normal 25 page limit outlined in the NIAID Multiproject 
Brochure to accommodate the special requirements listed below:
a. Specific Aims 
b. Background and Significance 
c. Preliminary Studies/Progress Report 
d. Research Design and Methods 
    o Research Plan
    o Concept Proposal for clinical studies (5 pages recommended) 
e. Administrative Core – 5 pages recommended
f. Data Management and Biostatistical Core – 5 pages recommended
g. Scientific Cores, if proposed – 5 pages recommended

APPLICATION PROCESSING:  Applications must be received by the application 
receipt date listed in the heading of this RFA.  If an application is 
received after that date, it will be returned to the applicant without 

The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will not accept any application in 
response to this RFA that is essentially the same as one currently pending 
initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application.  
However, when a previously unfunded application, originally submitted as an 
investigator-initiated application, is to be submitted in response to an RFA, 
it is to be prepared as a NEW application.  That is, the application for the 
RFA must not include an Introduction describing the changes and improvements 
made, and the text must not be marked to indicate the changes from the 
previous unfunded version of the application.

Concurrent submission of an R01 and a Component Project of a Multi-project 
Application:  Current NIH policy permits a component research project of a 
multi-project grant application to be concurrently submitted as a traditional 
individual research project (R01) application.  If, following review, both 
the multi-project application and the R01 application are found to be in the 
fundable range, the investigator must relinquish the R01 and will not have 
the option to withdraw from the multi-project grant.  This is an NIH policy 
intended to preserve the scientific integrity of a multi-project grant, which 
may be seriously compromised if a strong component project(s) is removed from 
the program.  Investigators wishing to participate in a multi-project grant 
must be aware of this policy before making a commitment to the Principal 
Investigator and awarding institution.

Although there is no immediate acknowledgement of the receipt of an 
application, applicants are generally notified of the review and funding 
assignment within 8 weeks.


Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the CSR and 
responsiveness by the NIAID.  Incomplete and/or nonresponsive applications 
will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.  
Applications that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be evaluated 
for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group 
convened by the NIAID in accordance with the review criteria stated below.  
As part of the initial merit review, all applications will:

o Undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have 
the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of applications under 
review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score
o Receive a written critique
o Receive a second level review by the National Advisory Allergy and 
Infectious Diseases Council



The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of 
biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In 
the written comments, reviewers will be asked to evaluate the application in 
order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a 
substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. The scientific review group 
will address and consider each of the following criteria in assigning the 
application’s overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each 
application.  The application does not need to be strong in all categories to 
be judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high 
priority score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out 
important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move 
a field forward.

SIGNIFICANCE: Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of 
the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What 
will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive 
this field?

APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses 
adequately developed, well integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the 
project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider 
alternative tactics?

INNOVATION: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or methods? 
Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing 
paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies?

INVESTIGATOR: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well-suited to 
carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level 
of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)?

ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done 
contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take 
advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful 
collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support?


The general review criteria for U19 multi-project cooperative agreement 
applications are presented in the NIAID brochure entitled "INSTRUCTIONS FOR 
APPLICATIONS FOR MULTI-PROJECT AWARDS” at  Each scientific research 
project proposed in a multi-project (U19) application will be reviewed 
according to the criteria stated above for single project applications.  In 
addition, the following items will also be considered in the determination of 
scientific merit and the priority score:

Overall Application:

The initial review group will judge the relationship and contributions of 
each component research project and core to the overall theme of the 
application. This evaluation is separate from the merit evaluation of 
individual projects and cores. Reviewers assess the overall application after 
rating individual research projects and cores according to the following 

o Scientific merit of the program as a whole as well as that of the 
individual research projects and cores. 

o Significance of the overall program goals. 

o Scientific gain achieved by combining the component projects into a multi-
project program beyond that achievable if each project were pursued 

o Cohesiveness and multi-disciplinary scope of the program and the 
coordination and interrelationships-of individual projects and core or cores 
to the common theme. 

o Leadership and scientific ability of the principal investigator: ability to 
develop a program of integrated research projects with a well-defined central 
research focus, and commitment and ability to devote adequate time and effort 
to the program. 

o Qualifications, experience, and commitment of investigators responsible for 
the individual research projects or core or cores and their contribution to 
the program, including their ability to devote adequate time and effort to 
the program. 

o For competing renewal and supplement applications, accomplishments of the 
program to date. 
Note: If peer reviewers deem that fewer than the required minimum number of 
research projects (two) have substantial and significant scientific merit, 
the application will not be recommended for further consideration.  NIAID 
will not award such applications or consider a strong project within a multi-
project application for a separate award. As stated above, you can submit 
your application simultaneously as an independent R01.

the above criteria, the following items will be considered in the 
determination of scientific merit and the overall priority score:

o Strength of the proposed collaborative relationships and strategic plan 
including scientific, administrative and organizational structures, 
communications, defined scientific and administrative roles and 
responsibilities and decision-making processes that facilitate attainment of 
the objective or objectives of the program.

o Potential for the project to enhance the clinical research capacity at the 
host site, including strengthening of administrative, laboratory, or clinical 
infrastructure and strengthening capacity of the host country research team 
to function independently on this and other research projects.

o Features and strengths of the existing field sites and/or scientific and 
clinical facilities where the research will be conducted and abilities of the 
key foreign staff to conduct the proposed study.

o Strengths of the proposed study design and conduct of the field or clinical 
research described in the five-page concept proposal.

o Adequacy of the time and effort proposed by the Principal Investigator, 
MFC, Data Manager, and Biostatistician. 

o Adequacy of existing or planned data management systems and proposed plans 
to enhance the capabilities and quality of the onsite data management system 
and expertise.  

o Importance of the proposed project to public health in the endemic country 
and likelihood that the proposed project would have an impact on the health 
of those in the host country.

o Adequacy of outcome evaluation plan to evaluate success of research, 
collaboration, strengthening of research capacity, training, and impact of 
research results.

subjects and protections from research risk relating to their participation 
in the proposed research will be assessed. (See criteria included in the 
section on Federal Citations, below).

plans to include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic groups 
(and subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the 
research.  Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be 
evaluated. (See Inclusion Criteria in the sections on Federal Citations, 

be used in the project, the five items described under Section f of the PHS 
398 research grant application instructions (rev. 5/2001) will be assessed.  


SHARING RESEARCH DATA: Applicants requesting more than $500,000 in direct 
costs in any year of the proposed research are expected to include a data 
sharing plan in their application. The reasonableness of the data sharing 
plan or the rationale for not sharing research data will be assessed by the 
reviewers. However, reviewers will not factor the proposed data-sharing plan 
into the determination of scientific merit or priority score. (See 
instructions and URL to policy in the Federal Citations, below.)

BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested period of 
support in relation to the proposed research.


Letter of Intent Receipt Date:      September 13, 2004
Application Receipt Date:           October 13, 2004
Peer Review Date:                   February, 2005
Council Review:                     May, 2005
Earliest Anticipated Start Date:    July, 2005


Award criteria that will be used to make award decisions include:

o Scientific merit of the proposed project as determined by peer review
o Availability of funds
o Programmatic priorities.

HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION:  Federal regulations (45CFR46) require that 
applications and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated with 
reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against 
these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and 
others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained.

DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING PLAN:  Data and safety monitoring is required for 
all types of clinical trials, including physiologic, toxicity, and dose-
finding studies (phase I); efficacy studies (phase II), efficacy, 
effectiveness and comparative trials (phase III). The establishment of data 
and safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) is required for multi-site clinical 
trials involving interventions that entail potential risk to the 
participants. (NIH Policy for Data Safety and Monitoring, NIH Guide for 
Grants and Contracts, June 12, 1998:  

SHARING RESEARCH DATA:  Investigators submitting an NIH application seeking 
$500,000 or more in direct costs in any single year are expected to include a 
plan for data sharing or state why this is not possible. Investigators should seek 
guidance from their institutions, on issues related to institutional 
policies, local IRB rules, as well as local, state and Federal laws and 
regulations, including the Privacy Rule. Reviewers will consider the data 
sharing plan but will not factor the plan into the determination of the 
scientific merit or the priority score.

the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations 
must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a 
clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is 
inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of 
the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 
(Section 492B of Public Law 103-43).

All investigators proposing clinical research should read the AMENDMENT "NIH 
Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical 
Research - Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and 
Contracts on October 9, 2001 
a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at
The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical 
research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB 
standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical 
trials consistent with the new PHS Form 398; and updated roles and 
responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community.  The policy 
continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) 
all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of 
plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by 
sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; 
and b) investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting 
analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group 

The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 
21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported 
by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include 

All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the 
"NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as participants in 
research involving human subjects that is available at

policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants for 
all investigators submitting NIH proposals for research involving human 
subjects.  This policy announcement is in the NIH Guide for Grants and 
Contracts Announcement, dated June 5, 2000, at

HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS (hESC): Criteria for federal funding of research 
on hESCs can be found at and at  Only 
research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human Embryonic Stem 
Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal funding (see   
It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide, in the project 
description and elsewhere in the application as appropriate, the official NIH 
identifier(s) for the hESC line(s)to be used in the proposed research.  
Applications that do not provide this information will be returned without 

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to 
provide public access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act 
(FOIA) under some circumstances.  Data that are (1) first produced in a 
project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2) 
cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action 
that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed 
through FOIA.  It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope 
of this amendment.  NIH has provided guidance at

Applicants may wish to place data collected under this RFA in a public 
archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the 
distribution for an indefinite period of time.  If so, the application should 
include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include 
information about this in the budget justification section of the 
application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure 
informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the 
potential for wider use of data collected under this award.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued final modification to 
the “Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information”, 
the “Privacy Rule,” on August 14, 2002.  The Privacy Rule is a federal 
regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 
(HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually identifiable 
health information, and is administered and enforced by the DHHS Office for 
Civil Rights (OCR).  

Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside 
with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR website 
( provides information on the Privacy Rule, including 
a complete Regulation Text and a set of decision tools on “Am I a covered 
entity?”  Information on the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH 
processes involving the review, funding, and progress monitoring of grants, 
cooperative agreements, and research contracts can be found at

URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES: All applications and proposals 
for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations. 
Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, Internet addresses (URLs) 
should not be used to provide information necessary to the review because 
reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites.   Furthermore, 
we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be compromised when they 
directly access an Internet site.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to 
achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy 
People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This 
RFA is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may 
obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at 


This program is described in the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance at in the following citations: No. 93.855, Immunology, 
Allergy, and Transplantation Research and No. 93.856, Microbiology and 
Infectious Diseases Research.  Awards are made under authorization of 
Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 
and 284) and administered under NIH grants policies and Federal Regulations 
42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. This program is not subject to the 
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health 
Systems Agency review.

The NIH Grants Policy Statement is available at This document includes 
general information about the grant application and review process; 
information on the terms and conditions that apply to NIH Grants and 
cooperative agreements; and a listing of pertinent offices and officials at 
the NIH.  All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost 
principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy 

The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free 
workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products.  In addition, 
Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in 
certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which 
regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early 
childhood development services are provided to children.  This is consistent 
with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of 
the American people.

Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices

H H S Department of Health
and Human Services

  N I H National Institutes of Health (NIH)
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland 20892