HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH ON ALCOHOL-RELATED PROBLEMS Release Date: March 6, 1998 PA NUMBER: PAS-98-037 P.T. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism PURPOSE The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) seeks health services research grant proposals which are aimed at developing a knowledge base to improve the delivery of services for alcohol-related problems. Such a knowledge base includes both treatment and preventive interventions. This program announcement (PA) invites research proposals to test strategies for improving the availability, accessibility, delivery, quality, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and outcomes of alcohol-related treatment and prevention services. The research objectives include, but are not limited to, the broad goal of advancing scientific understanding of the effects of organizational structures and processes, as well as financing and reimbursement mechanisms (specifically the combination of organizational structures and financing mechanisms that constitute managed care) on the availability, accessibility, utilization, delivery, content, quality, outcomes, cost, and cost-effectiveness of alcohol treatment services. Objectives also include studying the effectiveness and cost- effectiveness of alcohol prevention services in reducing the demand for health care services. Also of key importance is improving the methodological tools, data reporting systems, and analysis techniques useful for conducting health services research. This program announcement replaces the announcement "Health Services Research on Alcohol-Related Problems" (PA-96-021) issued February 1996. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This program announcement, is related to the priority areas of alcohol abuse reduction and alcoholism treatment. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0 or Summary Report: Stock No.017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402-9325 (Telephone: 202-512-1800). ELIGIBILITY Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign, for-profit and non-profit, public and private organizations, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal Government. Racial/ethnic minority individuals, women, and persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply as Principal Investigators. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT Research support may be obtained through applications for a regular research project grant (R01) or Small Grant (R03). Applications are also encouraged for Exploratory/Developmental Grants (R21), which are limited to up to 2 years for up to 100,000 for direct costs per year. Applicants for Exploratory/ Developmental Grants will need to cite the program announcement for Secondary Analysis of Existing Health Services Data Sets PA-97-066 in addition to this announcement in their application. Applicants may also submit Investigator- Initiated Interactive Research Project Grants under this program announcement. Interactive Research Project Grants require the coordinated submission of related regular research project grant applications from investigators who wish to collaborate on research. Potential applicants for Exploratory/Developmental Grants may obtain copies of the specific announcements from the NIAAA Home Page at http://www.niaaa.nih.gov or from the Office of Scientific Affairs, NIAAA, 6000 Executive Boulevard, Suite 409, MSC 7003, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, telephone: 301-443-4375 or FAX 301-443- 6077. Further information on grant mechanisms and areas of research interest may be obtained from program staff listed under INQUIRIES. FUNDS AVAILABLE It is estimated that up to $6 million will be available for FY 1998 and FY 1999 to fund approximately 24 grant awards under this announcement. This level of support is dependent on the receipt of a sufficient number of applications of high scientific merit. Awards must be made within NIH cost containment guidelines. Applicants are encouraged to contact NIAAA program staff to review these guidelines. Although the financial plans of the NIAAA provide for the support of this program, the award of grants pursuant to this program announcement is contingent upon the availability of funds for this purpose. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Health services research is defined as "research endeavors that study the impact of the organization, financing and management of health services on the quality, cost, access to and outcomes of care" (PL 101-321, Section 409). Health services research also is concerned with assessing the effectiveness of health services in applied clinical settings. For the purposes of this program announcement, health services research includes: (a) the assessment of the impact of treatment services and the effects of organizational and financing arrangements in "real world" clinical settings on the quality and outcomes of care provided to patients with alcohol abuse and alcoholism or with medical problems consequent to alcoholism, and (b) the assessment of the effectiveness of prevention services as well as their financing, organization, management, implementation, cost, and utilization. As directed by subsequent legislation (P.L. 103-43), for the purposes of this program announcement, health services research does not include studies of the efficacy of specific preventive, diagnostic, and treatment modalities. Applications whose main objective is to establish and support treatment or prevention service programs are not eligible for funding under this program announcement. Support for the costs of research-related treatment, rehabilitation, or prevention services and programs may be requested only for those particular costs related to the implementation of the research project and for that period of time required by the research project. These costs must be justified in terms of research objectives, methods, and designs that promise to yield important generalizable knowledge and/or to make a significant contribution to theoretical concepts. Applicants should adopt research designs appropriate to alcohol-related treatment and prevention services research studies (see Lettieri 1992; Sechrest, Persin, and Bunker 1990; Cook and Campbell 1979; Gold et al. 1996). Research designs should contain a judicious mixture of both scientific rigor and thoughtful responses to the exigencies of conducting research in "real world," applied settings. Applicants may wish to consult publications in health services research (e.g., Altman and Reinhardt 1996) as well as alcohol-specific examples of prevention and treatment research. The following list of research topics is for illustrative purposes. Proposals on topics not explicitly mentioned below, but which fall within the research objectives of this program announcement, will also be accepted. However, highest program priority is for research on the topics listed below. These were identified by the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism as the most promising areas for continued investment in health services research. Of the areas listed below, organization, financing, managed care, and cost- effectiveness are least well-represented in the portfolio of currently-funded grants. By contrast, effectiveness and outcome studies are relatively more numerous. The desire to balance the portfolio consequently gives greater priority to the former topics and less to the latter. However, strong applications in all areas will be considered for funding. Managed Care. Few issues have generated as much controversy in the general health care arena and in the delivery of alcohol services as the consequences of managed care. Despite the rapid growth of managed behavioral health care, little is known about how alcohol services are delivered under managed care arrangements. To address this knowledge gap, researchers should: 1. Conduct research on the financial, organizational, and management arrangements known as "managed care" and their effects on the accessibility, utilization, quality, cost, and outcomes of alcohol treatment services. 2. Conduct research that describes and monitors the characteristics and trends of managed care plans for alcohol treatment. Organization. The system that delivers alcohol treatment and prevention services is complex with many interconnected elements. The task of understanding this system is made more difficult in the current era of rapid change, in which new structures and roles are quickly emerging as others are re-defined. This rapid change creates a special need for research to: 1. Develop comprehensive models of the varied elements of the alcohol treatment system and explain the relationships, structure, incentives, integration, and interaction at work in those components. 2. Study the role played by Government -- as purchaser, provider, and regulator -- in the provision, delivery, and quality of alcohol treatment services. 3. Identify the factors that impede or facilitate the receipt of care by different client populations and the characteristics of the treatment services received by those client populations. Financing. Arrangements for financing alcohol services are similarly undergoing rapid and fundamental change. It is critical to understand the intended and unintended consequences of these changes. To understand these impacts, research should: 1. Study the allocation of risks and incentives within private and public arrangements for the financing of alcohol treatment services and the consequences of alternate financing arrangements. 2. Identify the factors that determine which individuals will be insured for alcohol-related services and the extent of the insurance coverage for those services. Access and Utilization. Issues of access to and utilization of services focus on whether individuals who need services actually receive them, as well as on the quantity and mix of services that are received. These questions are particularly important for planning purposes, as well as for promoting equitable access to treatment services. Research should: 1. Study the individual-, organizational-, and sociocultural-level factors that affect access to and utilization of alcohol treatment, with emphasis on exploring the interaction of these factors . 2. Determine whether group differences in utilization rates reflect differences in need or the existence of inequities in access to treatment. Effectiveness and Outcomes. Some of the most compelling questions about alcohol treatment have to do with what works -- that is, "What are the outcomes of different treatment modalities, for different types of clients, in different settings," and "What factors help to make treatment services effective?" In health services research, the focus is on outcomes in practice settings and under typical rather than ideal conditions. Efficacy studies of treatment outcomes under ideal, experimental conditions are not appropriate under the terms of this announcement but may be submitted in regular research grant applications. Instead research should: 1. Study whether treatments that have been shown to be efficacious in controlled trials are also effective in real life clinical settings. 2. Investigate the relative effectiveness of competing treatment strategies for specific forms of disorders and affected populations. Costs and Cost-Effectiveness. As the health care system changes, payers, providers, governments and consumers will make a host of decisions that will determine how dollars are spent for alcohol treatment. Making wise choices involves balancing costs against outcomes. These considerations suggest that future research should: 1. Compare the costs of alcohol treatment programs with their outcomes, benefits, and cost offsets. Prevention. While there have been many studies assessing prevention outcomes in terms of reduced drinking, fewer traffic accidents, or reduced incidence of cirrhosis or other chronic diseases, researchers have seldom taken the additional step of assessing whether these reductions have lowered subsequent demand for health care. To close this gap in current knowledge, research should: 1. Measure the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol prevention in reducing the demand for health care services. 2. Assess the outcomes of prevention activities among populations having a high level of health care services use or at risk for high-cost care events. Methodology. In health services research, as in other areas of research, advances in methodology are needed to produce the sophisticated tools that are used to build the knowledge base. To facilitate such progress, researchers should: 1. Improve existing measures of alcohol services delivery by working towards common definitions and measures and by testing the reliability and validity of those measures. 2. Enhance national-level data collection and reporting systems suitable for monitoring and analyzing alcohol health services delivery. 3. Refine methods used to analyze existing data sets relevant to alcohol health services research. INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their subpopulations must be included in all NIH supported biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects, unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification is provided that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43) and supersedes and strengthens the previous policies (Concerning the Inclusion of Women in Study Populations, and Concerning the Inclusion of Minorities in Study Populations), which have been in effect since 1990. The new policy contains some provisions that are substantially different from the 1990 policies. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research," which have been published in the Federal Register of March 20, 1994 (FR 59 14508-14513) and reprinted in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, Volume 23, Number 11, March 18, 1994. Investigators also may obtain copies of the policy from the program staff listed under INQUIRIES. Program staff may also provide additional relevant information concerning the policy. APPLICATION PROCEDURES Applications are to be submitted on the grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 5/95) and will be accepted at the standard application deadlines as indicated in the application kit. Application kits are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research and may be obtained from the Division of Extramural Outreach and Information Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7710, Bethesda, MD 20892-7910, telephone 301-710-0267, email, asknih@od.nih.gov. The title and number of the program announcement must be typed in section 2 of the face page of the application. The completed original application and five legible copies must be sent or delivered to: CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW (formerly Division of Research Grants) NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 6701 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE, ROOM 1040 - MSC 7710 BETHESDA, MD 20892-7710 BETHESDA, MD 20817-7710 (for express/courier service) REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Applications that are complete will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened in accordance with the standard NIH peer review procedures. As part of the initial merit review, all applications will receive a written critique and undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of the applications under review, will be discussed, assigned a priority score, and receive a second level review by the appropriate national advisory council. Review Criteria The five criteria to be used in the evaluation of grant applications are listed below. To put those criteria in context, the following information is contained in instructions to the peer reviewers. The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. The reviewers will comment on the following aspects of the application in their written critiques in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed and considered by the reviewers in assigning the overall score weighting them as appropriate for each application. Note that the application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move a field forward. Significance: Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field? Approach: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? Innovation: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? Investigator: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well-suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)? Environment: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support? Budget: Is the requested budget and estimation of time to completion of the project appropriate for the proposed research? In addition, plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will be evaluated as will the adequacy of plans to include both genders and minorities and their subgroups as appropriate for the scientific goal of the research. The initial review group will also examine the provisions for the protection of human and animal subjects and the safety of the research environment. AWARD CRITERIA Applications recommended for approval by the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism will be considered for funding on the basis of the overall scientific and technical merit of the application as determined by peer review, NIAAA programmatic needs and balance, and the availability of funds. INQUIRIES Inquiries concerning this program announcement are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Inquiries regarding programmatic issues may be directed to: For general information: Robert Huebner, Ph.D. Division of Clinical and Prevention Research National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 6000 Executive Boulevard MSC 7003 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003 Telephone: (301) 443-0787 FAX: (301) 443-8774 Email: bhuebner@willco.niaaa.nih.gov For studies on access, utilization, cost, and prevention: Mike Hilton, Ph.D. Division of Clinical and Prevention Research National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 6000 Executive Boulevard MSC 7003 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003 Telephone: (301) 443-8753 FAX: (301) 443-8774 Email: mhilton@willco.niaaa.nih.gov For studies on effectiveness, outcomes, and methods: Harold Perl, Ph.D. Division of Clinical and Prevention Research National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 6000 Executive Boulevard MSC 7003 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003 Telephone: (301) 443-0788 FAX: (301) 443-8774 Email: hperl@willco.niaaa.nih.gov For studies on organization, financing, and managed care: Wendy Smith, Ph.D. Division of Clinical and Prevention Research National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 6000 Executive Boulevard MSC 7003 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003 Telephone: (301) 443-8771 FAX: (301) 443-8774 Email: wsmith@willco.niaaa.nih.gov Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Edward Ellis Grants Management Branch National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 6000 Executive Boulevard MSC 7003 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003 Telephone: (301) 443-4706 FAX: (301) 443-3891 Email: eellis@willco.niaaa.nih.gov AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, No. 93.273. Awards are made under the authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Sections 301 and 464H, and administered under the PHS policies and Federal Regulations at Title 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74 or 45 CFR Part 95, as applicable. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency Review. The Public Health Service (PHS) strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people. References Altman, S.H. and Reinhardt, U.E. Strategic Choices for a Changing Health Care System. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 1996. Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979. Gold, M.J., Siegel, J.E., Russell, L.B., and Weinstein, M.C. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Lettieri, D.J. A Primer of Research Strategies in Alcoholism Treatment Assessment. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM) 92-1882. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1992. Sechrest, L.; Persin, E.; and Bunker, J., eds. Research Methodology: Strengthening Causal Interpretations of Nonexperimental Data. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 90-3454. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1990.
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
![]() |
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
![]() |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
![]() |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
![]() |
||||