Full Text PAR-97-103 PILOT CLINICAL TRIAL GRANT FOR NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE NIH Guide, Volume 26, Number 29, August 29, 1997 PA NUMBER: PAR-97-103 P.T. Keywords: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke PURPOSE The NINDS is committed to identifying effective treatments for neurological disorders by supporting well-executed clinical trials. Before proceeding to a full-scale clinical trial, pilot clinical studies are often required. The NINDS announces its interest in supporting pilot studies required to obtain necessary information to clearly establish the clinical basis for proceeding to a full-scale trial. The purpose of NINDS Pilot Clinical Trial Grant For Neurological Disease is to obtain preliminary data and conduct studies to support the rationale for a subsequent full-scale clinical trial of an intervention to treat or prevent neurological disease. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This PA, NINDS PILOT CLINICAL TRIAL GRANT FOR NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE, is related to the priority area of chronic disabling conditions. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0 or Summary Report: Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202- 512-1800). ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Applications may be submitted by foreign and domestic, for-profit and non-profit organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government. Racial/ethnic minority individuals, women, and persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply as principal investigators. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT The mechanism of support for the NINDS Pilot Clinical Trial Grant is the research project grant (R01). It is expected that most grants will not exceed $350,000 per year in direct costs for 3 years. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The research project should directly address how the Pilot Grant will advance the design of a subsequent full-scale clinical trial. The application should also address the intrinsic scientific merit of the study conducted under the Pilot Grant, whether or not a full-scale trial is performed. The NINDS Pilot Clinical Trial Grant may include: -Studies to refine the intervention strategy (dosage, duration, delivery system) -Studies to define and refine the target population -Collection of preliminary data for establishing measures of efficacy and safety In preparing for the definitive clinical trial, a pilot study will address questions that are formulated to optimize the design of the eventual trial rather than address the clinical question with lower power. The objective of the NINDS Pilot Clinical Trial Grant is to increase the quality of clinical research to evaluate interventions for the treatment or prevention of neurological disease. To meet this objective the proposed pilot study must successfully incorporate creative and realistic solutions to difficult problems in clinical neurological research for the particular intervention being evaluated. INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their subpopulations must be included in all NIH supported biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects, unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification is provided that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research," which have been published in the Federal Register of March 20, 1994 (FR 59 14508-14513) and in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, Vol. 23, No. 11, March 28, 1994. APPLICATION PROCEDURES Applications are to be submitted on the grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 5/95) and will be accepted at the standard application deadlines as indicated in the application kit. Applications kits are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research and may be obtained from the Division of Extramural Outreach and Information Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7910, Bethesda, MD 20892-7910, telephone 301/710-0267, email: [email protected]. The title and number of the program announcement must be typed in Section 2 on the face page of the application. As with most applications to NIH, the research plan is limited to 25 pages. All information for review of the NINDS Clinical Trial Planning Grant application must be included in the body of the application; appendices will not be considered during the review for this mechanism. The completed original application and four legible copies must be sent or delivered to: DIVISION OF RESEARCH GRANTS NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 6701 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE, ROOM 1040 - MSC 7710 BETHESDA, MD 20892 BETHESDA, MD 20817 (for express/courier service) In order to facilitate the review of applications assigned to the NINDS, the applicant should, at the same time, mail or deliver one copy of the application to: Dr. Lillian Pubols Chief, Scientific Review Branch NINDS, NIH Federal Building, Room 9C10 7550 Wisconsin Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9175 EMAIL: [email protected] REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines. Applications that are complete will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened in accordance with the standard NIH peer review procedures. For applications given primary assignment to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the initial peer review group will be convened by the Institute. As part of the initial merit review, all applications will receive a written critique and undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of applications under review, will be discussed, assigned a priority score, and receive a second level review by the appropriate national advisory council or board. Review Criteria for research grant applications: The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In the written review, comments on the following aspects of the application will be made in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed and considered in the assignment of the overall score. (1) Significance. Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field? In addition, the following must be addressed: - The state of equipoise in the medical and patient communities - The scientific basis for the proposed intervention including discussion of current practice and alternative interventions - Impact of the proposed intervention on health care and quality of life (2) Approach. Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? The following should be addressed: (a) Study Design and Procedures. - Sequence of clinical studies, including the proposed pilot study, that will produce a definitive clinical trial - Translation of the clinical question into statistical hypotheses - Selection of outcome measure(s) - Inclusion and exclusion criteria - Secondary questions (including capacity for post hoc analyses) - Detailed protocol with standardized procedures that will be used for this pilot study - Ethical and safety issues, and quality control procedures - Necessity for randomization and masking (b)Data Analysis - Specific methods to be used for data analysis - The sample size for the pilot study may not be adequate to detect any but the largest treatment differences; however, the data from this study should provide a basis for providing sample size estimates for future trials. - Population and demographics of the clinical condition (3) Innovation. Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or method? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? (4) Investigator. Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)? The following should be addressed: - Training and expertise in the clinical problem and the proposed intervention - Training and expertise in clinical trials (5) Environment. Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support? In addition, the adequacy of plans to include both genders and minorities and their subgroups as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research will be reviewed. Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be evaluated. The initial review group will also examine the provisions for the protection of human subjects, the safety of the research environment, and conformance with the NIH Guidelines for the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. AWARD CRITERIA Applications will compete for available funds with all other approved applications assigned to that IC. The following will be considered in making funding decisions: Quality of the proposed project as determined by peer review, availability of funds, and program priority. INQUIRIES Inquiries are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to: Joseph S. Drage, M.D. Training and Special Programs Officer, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Telephone: (301) 496-4188 FAX: 301-402-0302 Email: [email protected] Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Ms. Angeline Wilson Grants Management Branch National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Telephone: (301) 496-9231 FAX: 301-402-0219 Email: [email protected] AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.853. Awards are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Title IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42 USC 241 and 285) and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Part 74. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. The PHS strongly encourages all grant and contract recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people. .
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
![]() |
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
![]() |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
![]() |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
![]() |
||||