National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
R24 Resource-Related Research Projects
Only one application per institution is allowed, as defined in Part 2, Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
The purpose of the Tribal Institutional Review Board Establishment and Enhancement (TIRBEE) award is to support federally recognized American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) Tribes, Tribal colleges and universities, Tribal health programs, or Tribal organizations (collectively, eligible Tribal entities) to establish Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) or enhance the capacity of existing Tribal IRBs.
Not Applicable
Application Due Dates | Review and Award Cycles | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New | Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) | AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed | Scientific Merit Review | Advisory Council Review | Earliest Start Date |
January 27, 2025 | January 27, 2025 | Not Applicable | July 2025 | October 2025 | December 2025 |
January 27, 2026 | January 27, 2026 | Not Applicable | July 2026 | October 2026 | December 2026 |
January 27, 2027 | January 27, 2027 | Not Applicable | July 2027 | October 2027 | December 2027 |
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Not Applicable
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the How to Apply - Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the How to Apply - Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
IMPORTANT: Per NOT-OD-24-086 updated application forms (FORMS-I) will be used for this opportunity. The updated forms are not yet available and will be posted 30 calendar days or more prior to the first application due date. Once posted, you will be able to access the forms using one of the following submission options:
American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations have long experienced health disparities compared with other U.S. populations. Multiple factors, including limited access to health care, distrust of health-related research due to trauma inflicted on AI/AN communities by past unethical research practices, and limited opportunities for AI/AN Tribes to lead health research involving their communities have contributed to these disparities. The Native American Research Centers for Health (NARCH) program was launched in 2000 to help reduce the distrust of health research by AI/AN communities and promote AI/AN health research prioritized and led by eligible AI/AN Tribal entities, with the goal of ultimately improving AI/AN health. The program is one of the federal governments primary funding sources that support AI/AN health research.
To enhance the programs efficacy in meeting its goals, NIGMS completed a comprehensive NARCH program evaluation (NIGMS Evaluation and Tribal Consultation) culminating in a formal Tribal Consultation in 2021. The Tribal Consultation recommended that both research projects and research infrastructure supported under NARCH be primarily conducted by Tribal Nations and communities rather than traditional academic institutions or partners. This Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) is part of the NIGMS response to that recommendation. The Tribal Institutional Review Board Establishment and Enhancement (TIRBEE) award is aimed at building biomedical research capacity and infrastructure in AI/AN communities by expanding their Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and oversight capabilities, reducing reliance on external IRB mechanisms, and supporting Tribal autonomy over research administration.IRBs are a critical component of research involving human participants, ensuring protection of their rights, welfare, and well-being when involved in research conducted or supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (review the Office of Human Research Protections and FDA Guidance on IRBs and Protection of Human Subjects in Clinical Trials).
Applicant Organizations
The TIRBEE program supports federally recognized AI/AN Tribes, Tribal colleges and universities, Tribal health programs, or Tribal organizations (collectively termed Tribal entities, see Section III. 1. Eligible Applicants for details). Applications will be accepted from both individual and consortia of eligible Tribal entities to:
Activities Supported
Applicants may propose activities suitable to establishing or enhancing a Tribal IRB. Activities may include but are not limited to:
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Grant: A financial assistance mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply - Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Not Allowed: Only accepting applications that do not propose clinical trials.
The number of awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations and the number of meritorious applications received.
Application budgets must not exceed $350,000 in annual direct costs, excluding consortium facilities and administrative (F&A) costs. For applications that include partner organizations that are not eligible Tribal entities, the requested direct costs of subcontracts to these organizations, combined, must be 25% or less of the applications overall direct cost budget, excluding consortium F&A.
The project period is limited to 5 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
This funding opportunity is limited to the following eligible organizations:
Local Governments
The applicant organization must meet one of the following criteria:
An application may include foreign components only if one or more AI/AN Tribes with ancestral catchment areas crossing the U. S. border will participate in the proposed Tribal Institutional Review Board Establishment and Enhancement (TIRBEE) application.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from diverse backgrounds, including underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, individuals with disabilities, and women are always encouraged to apply for NIH support. See, Reminder: Notice of NIH's Encouragement of Applications Supporting Individuals from Underrepresented Ethnic and Racial Groups as well as Individuals with Disabilities, NOT-OD-22-019.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply - Application Guide.
The PD/PI or the contact PD/PI of a multi-PI (MPI) application must have a primary appointment with the applicant organization. Non-contact PDs/PIs' primary appointments may be with the applicant organization or a partner organization that is an eligible Tribal entity. PDs/PIs employed at eligible Tribal entities through special employment arrangements, such as interorganizational personnel agreements among federally recognized AI/AN Tribes, are allowable.
This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
Number of Applications
Only one application per institution (normally defined by having a unique UEI or NIH IPF number) is allowed.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the How to Apply - Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
All page limitations described in the How to Apply – Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply – Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Mentors are considered as senior/key personnel even if they are not committing any specified measurable effort to the proposed application. Enter Other Professional for the Project Role field and enter Mentor in the Other Project Role Category field. Biographical Sketches for mentors (if applicable) should be provided.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
The PD(s)/PI(s), the TIRBEE director (if different), IRB committee chair(s), administrators, and other staff are expected to devote adequate effort to the proposed activities. Mentors may be supported for up to 1 calendar month effort per year. Consultants' level of effort is not limited but must be well justified.
Funding may be requested for the activities described in Section I and for other justified activities.
Allowable costs include but are not limited to:
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
For applications that include partner organizations that are not eligible Tribal entities, the requested direct costs of subcontracts to these organizations combined must be 25% or less of the applications overall direct cost budget, excluding consortium F&A.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Specific Aims: The Specific Aims should state clearly the objectives of the application and how meeting them will enable IRB establishment or enhancement.
Research Strategy: The goal of the TIRBEE award is to build the capacity and infrastructure for biomedical research involving human participants in AI/AN communities by expanding their Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and oversight capabilities. Accordingly, the Research Strategy section should outline the objectives and approaches for IRB workforce development and infrastructure enhancement, with the goal of supporting Tribal autonomy over research conducted by, with, and for Tribal communities.
Use the following headings in the Research Strategy:
Program Description: Describe the goals of the application (IRB establishment or enhancement) in the context of currently available IRB-related resources and participation in existing IRBs. Applicants should:
Regulatory Competencies Plan: Describe plans for providing culturally appropriate and federally required education and training to individuals administering and coordinating an IRB and/or those who will participate in IRB review. The Regulatory Competencies Plan should:
IRB Development Plan: Describe the overall development strategy, operational plan, and organizational structure of the IRB. The IRB Development Plan should:
Sustainability Plan: A primary goal of the TIRBEE Program is to develop and support sustainable IRB research infrastructure. The Sustainability Plan should:
Letters of Support (Required): The application must include a Tribal Letter of Commitment from the applicant organization that is signed by an authorized senior organizational official from the applicant Tribal entity such as a Tribal council leader or president of a Tribal college/university. The letter should describe the organizations commitment to develop and sustain IRB-related research infrastructure.
Applications that do not include a Tribal Letter of Commitment from a senior organizational official will be withdrawn without review.
Additional letters of support as well as Tribal Resolutions and Agreements may be included in the application and should cite the application grant title. .
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply - Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered Yes to the question Are Human Subjects Involved? on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Delayed Onset Study
Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIHs electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organizations profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and NIGMS. Applications that are incomplete or non-compliant will not be reviewed.
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at [email protected].
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
For this particular NOFO, note the following: The goal of the TIRBEE award is to build capacity and infrastructure for biomedical research involving human participants in AI/AN communities by expanding their Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and oversight capabilities. The program will support federally recognized American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) Tribes, Tribal colleges and universities, Tribal health programs, or Tribal organizations (collectively, eligible Tribal entities) to establish Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) or enhance the capacity of existing Tribal IRBs.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the capacity of AI/AN communities to conduct research involving human participants, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Do the proposed Tribal IRB activities address the research needs of the communities that it will serve? How will successful completion of the aims bring unique advantages or capabilities to the Tribal Health research communities and advance Tribal autonomy over research with human subjects?
How well justified is the need for a new or enhanced Tribal IRB? Is the size of the pool of potential IRB users sufficient to merit development/enhancement of the IRB?
Are the PD(s)/PI(s) and other personnel well suited to their roles in the IRB activities? Do they have appropriate experience and training in overseeing human subjects research regulatory compliance? If the Center is multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise and skills; are their leadership approaches, governance, plans for conflict resolution, and organizational structure appropriate for the proposed IRB activities? Does the applicant organization have experience overseeing selection and management of subawards, if needed?
If additional partner organizations and/or collaborators are proposed, how well suited is their expertise for their proposed roles? In what ways do their skills and knowledge augment the expertise of the PD(s)/PI(s) and other personnel from the submitting organization? How strong is the proposed commitment of the applicant organization and partners/collaborators (if applicable) to the goals of the project and to supporting Tribal control of research?
Does the application propose refinement, improvement or new organizational concepts, management strategies or other culturally-appropriate approaches in coordinating the proposed IRB activities?
Are the overall strategy, operational plan, and organizational structure of the IRB well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the goals of the proposed IRB activities? How robust are plans and milestones for evaluating progress? How appropriate are plans to address unanticipated challenges and to improve the proposed activities based on participant feedback? Does the proposed strategy adequately establish feasibility associated with its activities? How suitable are plans to sustain improvements to Tribal IRB capacity beyond TIRBEE funding?
How appropriate are the plans to encourage and recruit Tribal members to participate in the proposed training and then serve as IRB members? How suitable are plans to promote a culturally appropriate research environment and respect for Tribal sovereignty?
How robust is the Regulatory Competencies Plan? Will the proposed educational modules and courses that will be taken result in a well-trained IRB staff and provide Tribal members who participate in IRB reviews with expertise in federal, institutional, and Tribal regulatory research policies? How strong are the plans to track the progress of individuals through the courses, maintain records of certifications and renew competencies as required, and monitor participation in IRB reviews?
How well-developed are plans to facilitate the coordination between investigators and Tribal entities to obtain Tribal approvals for research projects? How appropriate are plans to provide mentoring to the TIRBEE staff?
To what extent do the succession plans for recruiting or replacing personnel with the appropriate skills and knowledge provide confidence that there will be continuity in providing IRB services?
Is the organizational environment sufficient to support the proposed activities?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults) to determine if it is justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
For Resubmissions, the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by the National Institute for General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), in accordance with NIH peer review policies and practices, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
Applications may undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the appropriate national Advisory Council or Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.
Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicants federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicants integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants. This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipients business official.
In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.
Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk. For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:
All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.
Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable federal regulations. NIH may terminate awards under certain circumstances. See 2 CFR Part 200.340 Termination and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.5.2 Remedies for Noncompliance or Enforcement Actions: Suspension, Termination, and Withholding of Support.
Not Applicable
Consistent with the 2023 NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing, when data management and sharing is applicable to the award, recipients will be required to adhere to the Data Management and Sharing requirements as outlined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Upon the approval of a Data Management and Sharing Plan, it is required for recipients to implement the plan as described.
When multiple years are involved, recipients will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.4.1 Reporting. To learn more about post-award monitoring and reporting, see the NIH Grants & Funding website, see Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting.
A final RPPR, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.6 Closeout. NIH NOFOs outline intended research goals and objectives. Post award, NIH will review and measure performance based on the details and outcomes that are shared within the RPPR, as described at 2 CFR Part 200.301.
In carrying out stewardship of grant programs, NIGMS will periodically evaluate the TIRBEE program, employing the representative measures identified below. In assessing the effectiveness of research resource investments, NIGMS may use information from progress reports and public databases, PD/PIs, and from participants themselves. Where necessary, PD/PIs and participants may be appropriately contacted after the completion of the grant period for updates on participants subsequent outcomes, respecting Tribal sovereignty and data ownership.
The overall evaluation of the program will be based on metrics that may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Characteristics of the applicant and awardee pool for the program, such as:
Measures of resource development and utilization, such as:
Indicators of research community outreach and engagement, such as:
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk (Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues)
Finding Help Online: https://www.era.nih.gov/need-help (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
General Grants Information (Questions regarding application instructions, application processes, and NIH grant resources)
Email: [email protected] (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-480-7075
Grants.gov Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and Workspace)
Contact Center Telephone: 800-518-4726
Email: [email protected]
Crystal Richards, Ph.D.
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Email: [email protected]
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Email: [email protected]
Christy Leake
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Email: [email protected]
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.