EXPIRED
Department of Health and Human Services
Issuing Organization
Office of
Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR), (http://obssr.od.nih.gov/)
Participating Organizations
Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ), (http://www.ahrq.gov/)
National
Institutes of Health (NIH), (http://www.nih.gov)
Components of Participating Organizations
Office of Behavioral
and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR), (http://obssr.od.nih.gov/)
National
Cancer Institute (NCI), (http://www.nci.nih.gov/)
National
Institute on Aging (NIA), (http://www.nia.nih.gov/)
National
Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), (http://www.nibib.nih.gov/)
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD),(http://www.nichd.nih.gov/)
National
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), (http://www.nidcr.nih.gov)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), (http://www.niddk.nih.gov/)
National
Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), (http://www.nida.nih.gov/)
National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), (http://www.niehs.nih.gov/)
National
Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), (http://www.nimh.nih.gov/)
National
Library of Medicine (NLM), (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/)
Title: Understanding and Promoting Health Literacy (R03)
Announcement Type
This is a reissue of PAR-04-117,
which was previously released June 22, 2004.
Update: The following update relating to this announcement has been issued:
NOTICE: Applications submitted in response to this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) for Federal assistance must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov) using the SF424 Research and Related (R&R) forms and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE SUBMITTED IN PAPER FORMAT.
This FOA must be read in conjunction with the application guidelines included with this announcement in Grants.gov/Apply for Grants (hereafter called Grants.gov/Apply).
A registration process is necessary before submission and applicants are highly encouraged to start the process at least four weeks prior to the grant submission date. See Section IV.
Two steps are required for on time submission:
1) The application must be submitted to Grants.gov by 5:00 p.m. local time (of the applicant institution/organization) on the submission date (see Key Dates below).
2) Applicants must complete a verification step in the eRA Commons within two (2) business days of notification from NIH. Note: Since email can be unreliable, it is the responsibility of the applicant to periodically check on their application status in the Commons.
Program Announcement (PA) Number: PAR-06-132
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number(s)
93.113, 93.121,
93.242, 93.279, 93.286, 93.393, 93.847, 93.865, 93.866, 93.879
Key Dates
Release/Posted
Date: March 2, 2006
Opening Date: May 2,
2006 (Earliest date and application may be submitted to Grants.gov)
Letters of Intent Receipt Date: September 13, 2006
Application Submission Date: October 13, 2006
Peer
Review Date(s): February March 2007
Council
Review Date(s): May-June 2007
Earliest
Anticipated Start Date: July 2007
Additional Information
To Be Available Date (Url Activation Date): Not applicable
Expiration Date: October
14, 2006
Due Dates for E.O. 12372
Not Applicable
Additional Overview
Content
Executive Summary
The ultimate goal of this funding opportunity announcement (FOA) is to encourage the development of empirical research on health literacy concepts and theory as these relate to the NIH public health goal of improving health outcomes for persons with medical and behavioral disorders and conditions.
Table of Contents
Part I Overview Information
Part
II Full Text of Announcement
Section
I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Research
Objectives
Section
II. Award Information
1. Mechanism of
Support
2. Funds Available
Section
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible
Applicants
A.
Eligible Institutions
B.
Eligible Individuals
2.Cost Sharing or
Matching
3. Other - Special
Eligibility Criteria
Section
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Request
Application Information
2. Content and Form
of Application Submission
3. Submission Dates
and Times
A.
Submission, Review and Anticipated Start Dates
1. Letter of Intent
B.
Sending an Application to the NIH
C.
Application Processing
4. Intergovernmental
Review
5. Funding
Restrictions
6. Other Submission
Requirements
Section
V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
2. Review and
Selection Process
A.
Additional Review Criteria
B.
Additional Review Considerations
C.
Sharing Research Data
D.
Sharing Research Resources
3. Anticipated
Announcement and Award Dates
Section
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award
Notices
2.
Administrative and National Policy Requirements
3. Reporting
Section
VII. Agency Contact(s)
1.
Scientific/Research Contact(s)
2. Peer Review
Contact(s)
3. Financial/
Grants Management Contact(s)
Section VIII. Other Information - Required Federal
Citations
Part
II - Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Research Objectives
Background
Health literacy is a complex phenomenon that involves individuals, families, communities and systems. For instance, consumers, patients, caregivers, or other laypersons may vary with respect to:
Too often people with the greatest health burdens have limited access to relevant health information. In part, this is due to the complex and cumbersome ways health information often is presented, and due to individuals limited abilities to fully interpret and understand complex health terminology and instructions, and to make personal decisions related to risk avoidance or risk reduction strategies. For instance, to follow health care instructions, patients need to be able to comprehend written and oral prescription instructions, directions for self-care, and plans for follow-up tests and appointments. In addition, health care providers may not communicate effectively with individuals with limited levels of literacy. For instance, achieving informed consent for treatment is difficult when health care personnel cannot explain biological processes or treatment procedures in simplified language and patients cannot interpret health information. These situations hamper the effectiveness of health professionals efforts to prevent, diagnose and treat medical conditions, and limit many health care consumers abilities to make important health care decisions.
Low health literacy is a wide spread problem, affecting more than 90 million adults in the United States (Kirsch, Jungeblut, Jenkins & Kolstad, 1993). Low health literacy results in patients inadequate engagement in, and benefit from, health care advances as well as medical errors. Low health literacy is likely to be a major contributor of adverse health outcomes (AMA, 1999; Baker, Gazmararian, Williams, Scott, Parker, Green, Ren, & Peel, 2002; Baker, Parker, Williams, & Clark, 1998). Research has linked low or limited health literacy with such adverse outcomes as poorer self-management of chronic diseases, less healthy behaviors, higher rates of hospitalizations, and overall poorer health (Gazmararian, Baker, Williams, Parker, Scott, Green, Fehrenbach, Ren, & Koplan, 1999; Schillinger, Grumbach, Piette, Wang, Osmond, Daher, Palacios, Sullivan, & Bindman, 2002; Williams, Parker, Baker, Pitkin, Coates, & Nurss, 1995).
Specific Objectives
This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) invites applications to develop research on health literacy in general areas that include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Nature and Scope
2. Lifespan and Cultural Differences
Applications addressing health literacy as an age-differentiated phenomenon might explore the developmental precursors of low health literacy and the age-related changes in reading and other cognitive skills throughout the life course that may contribute to these difficulties. Research might include, but is not limited to:
3. Mediators and Moderators of Health Literacy: Protective and Risk Factors
4. Impacts and Consequences of Low Health Literacy
5. Preventative Interventions: Education and Training
6. Other Health Literacy Interventions
7. Methodology and Research Technology Development
Approaches:
A wide variety of research approaches are encouraged under this Program Announcement:
The research must involve either:
Studies to develop, or evaluate, the readability or utility of specific materials that are intended for single uses or single audiences are not responsive to this program announcement unless these investigations are integral to testing a significant research hypothesis related to health literacy.
Projects may employ any one or combination of study designs, research approaches, and data collection techniques. Secondary analyses of existing datasets as well as meta-analytic studies are also suitable for this announcement. Multilevel, multidisciplinary, and interdisciplinary research is also encouraged, especially studies that incorporate individual, family, community and societal mediators of health literacy in childhood and adulthood, or state-of-the-art health communication theory and knowledge.
Researchers are encouraged to address ongoing investigations of prevention, healthy living, chronic disease management, patient-based health care, cultural competence, and health disparities to inform the research on health literacy. Research questions can focus on consumers, patients, clients or other population groups; the strategies and tactics used by providers of medical and health information/communication to enable them to effectively reach literacy challenged population; or the influences of health literacy upon interactions between consumers, patients, clients, providers, and organizations or systems.
Additional Resources:
Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) may provide a valuable resource to applicants interested in responding to this PA, particularly those that have an active collaboration with colleges and universities. These FQHCs include Community Health Centers and Migrant Health Centers across the country. Information may be found at the DHHS Health Resources and Services Administration website for the Bureau of Primary Health Care: http://bphc.hrsa.gov/chc/lookalikes.htm.
The Indian Health Service (IHS) through its direct federal programs, Tribal programs and urban programs serves more than 1.6 million American Indian and Alaska Native people. These programs may also be of interest to applicants. Information can be found at the IHS website at: www.ihs.gov
Reference Report:
The Institute of Medicine’s recent report, Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion (2004) reviews the current body of knowledge about health literacy, and identifies actions for the promotion of health literacy in society. Potential applicants are encouraged to consult this report as a general reference:
Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. (2004). L. Nielsen-Bohlman, A. M. Panzer, and D. A. Kindig, Editors. Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, Institute of Medicine. (Available at http://www.iom.edu/report.asp?id=19723)
See Section VIII, Other Information
- Required Federal Citations, for policies related to this announcement.
Section
II. Award Information
1. Mechanism of Support
This
funding opportunity will use the NIH Small Research
Grant R03 award mechanism. As an applicant, you will be solely responsible for planning,
directing, and executing he proposed project.
The R03 mechanism should be used for support of pilot and/or feasibility studies for concepts that are sound and justifiable, but not sufficiently developed for the Research Project Grant (R01) mechanism. The R03 mechanism may also be appropriate for projects involving secondary analysis of existing data; small, self-contained research projects; development of research methodology; and the development of new research technology.
A project period of up to two years and a budget for direct costs of up to $50,000 per year for a maximum of $100,000 direct costs over a two-year project period may be requested for the R03 mechanism.
This FOA uses just-in-time concepts. It also uses the modular budget formats (see the Modular Applications and Awards section of the NIH Grants Policy Statement. All applications submitted in response to this FOA must use the modular budget format. Specifically, if you are submitting an application with direct costs in each year of $250,000 or less (excluding consortium Facilities and Administrative [F&A] costs), use the PHS398 Modular Budget component provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Package and Instructions Guide (see specifically the PHS398 Modular Budget component).
Competing renewal (formerly competing continuation ) applications will not be accepted. Small grant support may not be used for thesis or dissertation research. Up to two resubmissions (formerly revisions") of a previously reviewed R03 grant application may be submitted. See NOT-OD-05-046, April 29, 2005.
An R03 is not renewable.
Submission of an application under this funding opportunity precludes concurrent submission of any other Public Health Service (PHS) application containing substantially the same research proposal. In addition, these R03 awards may not be used to supplement research projects currently supported by Federal or non-Federal funds, or to provide interim support of projects under review by the PHS.
2. Funds Available
Applications received in response to this program announcement will compete for funds in the general funding pool of the participating NIH ICs. No specific funds have been set aside for this announcement.
Because the nature and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application, it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary. Although the financial plans of the ICs provide support for this program, awards pursuant to this funding opportunity are contingent upon the availability of funds and the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
F&A
costs requested by consortium participants are not included in the direct cost
limitation. See NOT-OD-05-004, November 2, 2004.
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
1.A. Eligible
Institutions
You
may submit an application(s) if your organization has any of the following
characteristics:
1.B.
Eligible Individuals
Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources
necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Project Director/Principal
Investigator (PD/PI) is invited to work with his/her institution to develop an
application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic
groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply
for NIH support.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
This
program does not require cost sharing as defined in the current NIH Grants Policy Statement.
3. Other-Special Eligibility Criteria
Investigators
wishing to apply for an R03 grant should be aware that not all NIH Institutes
and Centers (ICs) accept investigator-initiated R03 applications and that the
different ICs may have specific purposes for which they use this funding
mechanism. Therefore, all investigators should consult the R03 website at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/r03.htm as well as the IC staff listed on this Web site to determine if an R03
application is appropriate.
Information related to the use of R03 awards by ICs that do not participate in this FOA is also listed on the R03 Web site. Additional information about special initiatives involving R03 awards can be found by searching the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html#search, by examining IC Web sites, and by consulting with NIH staff. All investigator-initiated small grant R03 applications described in this FOA will be assigned to the ICs according to standard PHS referral guidelines and specific program interests.
Applicants may submit more than one application, provided each application is scientifically distinct. Small grant support may not be used for thesis or dissertation research.
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
Registration and Instructions for Submission via Grants.gov
To download an Application
Package and Application Guide for completing the SF424 (R&R) forms for this
FOA, link to http://www.grants.gov/Apply/ and follow
the directions provided on that Web site.
A one-time registration is required for institutions/organizations at both:
PD/PIs should work with their institutions/organizations to make sure they are registered in the NIH eRA Commons.
Several additional separate actions are required before an applicant institution/organization can submit an electronic application, as follows:
1) Organizational/Institutional Registration in Grants.gov/Get Started
2) Organizational/Institutional Registration in the eRA Commons
3) Project Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) Registration in the NIH eRA Commons: Refer to the NIH eRA Commons System (COM) Users Guide.
Note that if a PD/PI is also an NIH peer-reviewer with an Individual DUNS and CCR registration, that particular DUNS number and CCR registration are for the individual reviewer only. These are different from the DUNS number and CCR registration used by an applicant organization. Individual DUNS and CCR registration should be used only for the purpose of personal reimbursement and should not be used on any grant applications submitted to the Federal Government.
Several of the steps of the registration process could take four weeks or more. Therefore, applicants should immediately check with their business official to determine whether their institution is already registered in both Grants.gov and the NIH eRA Commons. The NIH will accept electronic applications only from organizations that have completed all necessary registrations.
1. Request
Application Information
Applicants must download the SF424 (R &R)
application forms and SF424 (R&R) Application Guide for this FOA through Grants.gov/Apply.
Note: Only the forms package directly attached to a
specific FOA can be used. You will not be able to use any other SF424 (R&R)
forms (e.g., sample forms, forms from another FOA), although some of the
"Attachment" files may be useable for more than one FOA.
For further assistance contact GrantsInfo, Telephone 301-710-0267,
Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov.
Telecommunications for the hearing impaired: TTY 301-451-5936.
2. Content and Form
of Application Submission
Prepare all applications using the SF424
(R&R) application forms and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide (MS
Word) or PDF)
instructions.
The SF424 (R&R) Application Guide is critical to submitting a complete and accurate application to NIH.
There are fields within the SF424 (R&R) application components that, although not marked as mandatory, are required by NIH (e.g., the Credential log-in field of the Research & Related Senior/Key Person Profile component must contain the PD/PI s assigned eRA Commons User ID). Agency-specific instructions for such fields are clearly identified in the Application Guide. For additional information, see Tips and Tools for Navigating Electronic Submission on the front page of Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.
The SF424 (R&R) application is comprised of data arranged in separate components. Some components are required, others are optional. The forms package associated with this FOA in Grants.gov/APPLY will include all applicable components, required and optional. A completed application in response to this FOA will include the following components:
Required Components:
SF424
(R&R) (Cover component)
Research & Related Project/Performance Site Locations
Research &
Related Other Project Information
Research &
Related Senior/Key Person
Research &
Related Budget
PHS398 Cover Page
Supplement
PHS398 Research Plan
PHS398 Checklist
PHS 398 Modular Budget
Optional Components:
PHS398
Cover Letter File
Research & Related
Subaward Budget Attachment Form
Foreign Organizations
Several special
provisions apply to applications submitted by foreign organizations:
Proposed research should provide a unique research
opportunity not available in the United States.
3. Submission Dates and Times
See Section IV.3.A for details.
3.A. Submission, Review and Anticipated Start Dates
Opening Date: March 2, 2006 (Earliest date an application may be submitted to Grants.gov)
Letters of Intent Receipt Date: September 13, 2006
Application Submission Date: October 13, 2006
Peer Review Date(s):
February March 2007
Council Review Date(s):
May June 2007
Earliest Anticipated
Start Date: July 2007
3.A.1. Letter of
Intent
Prospective
applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following
information:
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not
binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the
information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review
workload and plan the review.
The letter of intent
is to be sent by the date listed in Section IV.3.A.
The
letter of intent should be sent to:
Susan Solomon, Ph.D.
Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
Office of
the Director
National
Institutes of Health
31 Center
Drive, Room
B2B37, MSC 2027
Bethesda MD 20892-2027
Telephone:
301-496-0979
Fax:
301-402-1150
Email: SSolomon@NIH.Gov
3.B. Sending an
Application to the NIH
To
submit an application in response to this FOA, applicants should access this
FOA via http://www.grants.gov/Apply and follow steps 1-4. Note: Applications must only be submitted electronically.
PAPER
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
3.C. Application Processing
Applications may be submitted
to Grants.gov on or after the opening date and must be submitted
no later than 5:00 p.m. local time (of the applicant institution/organization) on the application submission date(s).
(See Section IV.3.A. for all dates.) If an application is not submitted
by the submission date(s) and time, the application may be delayed in the
review process or not reviewed.
Upon receipt, applications will be transferred from
Grants.gov to the NIH Electronic Research Administration process for validation.
Both the PD/PI and the Signing Official for the organization must verify the
submission via Commons within two (2) business days of notification of the NIH validation.
Upon receipt applications will be evaluated for completeness by the
Center for Scientific Review , NIH. Incomplete applications will not be
reviewed.
The NIH will not accept any application in response to this FOA that
is essentially the same as one currently pending initial merit review unless
the applicant withdraws the pending application. The NIH will not accept any
application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed. This does not
preclude the submission of an application already reviewed with substantial changes,
but such application must include an Introduction addressing the previous
critique. Note such an application is considered a "resubmission" for
the SF424 (R&R).
There will be an acknowledgement of receipt of
applications from Grants.gov and the Commons. Information related to the
assignment of an application to a Scientific Review Group is also in the Commons.
4. Intergovernmental Review
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental
review.
5. Funding Restrictions
All NIH awards are subject to the
terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in
the NIH
Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-Award
Costs are allowable. A grantee may, at its own risk and without NIH prior
approval, incur obligations and expenditures to cover costs up to 90 days
before the beginning date of the initial budget period of a new award if such
costs: are necessary to conduct the project, and would be allowable under the
grant, if awarded, without NIH prior approval. If specific expenditures would
otherwise require prior approval, the grantee must obtain NIH approval before
incurring the cost. NIH prior approval is required for any costs to be incurred
more than 90 days before the beginning date of the initial budget period of a
new award.
The incurrence of
pre-award costs in anticipation of a competing or non-competing award imposes
no obligation on NIH either to make the award or to increase the amount of the
approved budget if an award is made for less than the amount anticipated and is
inadequate to cover the pre-award costs incurred. NIH expects the grantee to be
fully aware that pre-award costs result in borrowing against future support and
that such borrowing must not impair the grantee's ability to accomplish the
project objectives in the approved time frame or in any way adversely affect
the conduct of the project. See the NIH Grants
Policy Statement.
6. Other Submission Requirements
The NIH requires the PD/PI to fill in his/her Commons User ID in the PROFILE Project Director/Principal Investigator section, Credential log-in field of the Research & Related Senior/Key Person Profile component. The applicant organization must include its DUNS number in its Organization Profile in the eRA Commons. This DUNS number must match the DUNS number provided at CCR registration with Grants.gov. For additional information, see Tips and Tools for Navigating Electronic Submission on the front page of Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.
Renewal (formerly competing continuation or Type 2 ) applications are not permitted.
All application instructions outlined in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide (MS Word or PDF) are to be followed, with the following requirements for R03 applications:
Research Plan
The Specific Aims, Background and Significance, Preliminary Studies, and Research Design and Methods components of the Research Plan must not exceed 10 pages. All tables, graphs, figures, diagrams, and charts must be included with the 10-page limit. Be succinct and remember that there is no requirement to use all 10 pages allotted to the Research Plan.
Please note that a Progress Report is not needed.
For resubmission of an application, an Introduction (not to exceed one page) in addition to the Research Plan is required. This Introduction, which is not included in the ten-page limit, must include responses to the criticisms and issues raised in the summary statement. The changes in the Research Plan must be clearly marked by appropriate bracketing, indenting or changing of typography, unless the changes include most of the text. Changes should be summarized in the Introduction.
Appendix. (New and Resubmission Applications)
The appendix may include graphic images of gels, micrographs, etc. provided that the image (which may be reduced in size) is also included within the 10-page limit of Items 2-5 of the Research Plan. No images may be included in the Appendix that are not also represented within the Research Plan. No publications or other printed material, with the exception of pre-printed questionnaires or surveys, may be included in the appendix.
Specific Instructions for Modular Grant applications.
All R03 applications must be submitted in the modular budget format. The modular budget format simplifies the preparation of the budget by limiting the level of budgetary detail. Applicants may request direct costs for two $25,000 modules, up to a total annual direct cost of $50,000 per year, for up to two years ($100,000 maximum, four modules of $25,000 each).
The SF 424 R&R Application Guide (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/424/SF424_RR_Guide_General_Ver2.doc) includes step-by-step guidance for preparing modular budgets. Additional information on modular budgets is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm.
Note: While each section of the Research Plan needs to be uploaded separately as a PDF attachment, applicants are encouraged to construct the Research Plan as a single document, separating sections into distinct PDF attachments just before uploading the files. This approach will enable applicants to better monitor formatting requirements such as page limits. All attachments must be provided to NIH in PDF format, filenames must be included with no spaces or special characters, and a .pdf extension must be used.
Plan for Sharing
Research Data
Not
applicable
Sharing Research
Resources
NIH policy requires that grant awardee recipients make unique research
resources readily available for research purposes to qualified individuals
within the scientific community after publication (NIH Grants Policy Statement http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part7.htm#_Toc54600131).
Investigators responding to this funding opportunity should include a plan for
sharing research resources addressing how unique research resources will be
shared or explain why sharing is not possible.
The adequacy of the
resources sharing plan and any related data sharing plans will be considered by
Program staff of the funding organization when making recommendations about
funding applications. The effectiveness of
the resource sharing will be evaluated as part of the administrative review of
each Non-Competing
Grant Progress Report (PHS 2590). See Section VI.3.,
Reporting.
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the
review process.
2. Review and Selection Process
Applications submitted for this funding opportunity will be assigned
to the ICs on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines.
Appropriate
scientific review groups convened in accordance with the standard NIH peer review
procedures (http://www.csr.nih.gov/refrev.htm)
will evaluate applications for scientific and technical merit.
As part of the initial merit review, all applications will:
Applications submitted in response to this funding opportunity will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
The NIH R03 small grant is a mechanism for supporting discrete, well-defined projects that realistically can be completed in two years and that require limited levels of funding. Because the research plan is restricted to 10 pages, a small grant application will not have the same level of detail or extensive discussion found in an R01 application. Accordingly, reviewers should evaluate the conceptual framework and general approach to the problem, placing less emphasis on methodological details and certain indicators traditionally used in evaluating the scientific merit of R01 applications, including supportive preliminary data. Appropriate justification for the proposed work can be provided through literature citations, data from other sources, or from investigator-generated data. Preliminary data are not required, particularly in applications proposing pilot or feasibility studies.
The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, to improve the control of disease, and to enhance health. In their written critiques, reviewers will be asked to comment on each of the following criteria in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed and considered in assigning the overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. Note that an application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move a field forward.
Significance: Does this study address an
important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will
scientific knowledge or clinical practice be advanced? What will be the effect
of these studies on the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services,
or preventative interventions that drive this field?
Approach: Are the
conceptual or clinical framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately
developed, well integrated, well reasoned, and appropriate to the aims of the
project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider
alternative tactics?
Innovation: Is the
project original and innovative? For example: Does the project challenge
existing paradigms or clinical practice; address an innovative hypothesis or
critical barrier to progress in the field? Does the project develop or employ
novel concepts, approaches, methodologies, tools, or technologies for this
area?
Investigators: Are the
investigators appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is
the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the PD/PI and other
researchers? Does the investigative team bring complementary and integrated
expertise to the project (if applicable)?
Environment: Does the
scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the
probability of success? Do the proposed studies benefit from unique features of
the scientific environment, or subject populations, or employ useful
collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support?
In the
review of small grant (R03) applications, because the research plan is
restricted to 10 pages, a small grant application will not have the same level
of detail or extensive discussion found in a typical Research Project (R01)
grant application. Accordingly, reviewers should evaluate the conceptual
framework and general approach to the problem, placing less emphasis on
methodological details and certain indicators traditionally used in evaluating
the scientific merit of R01 applications including supportive preliminary data.
Appropriate justification for the proposed work can be provided through
literature citations, data from other sources, or from investigator-generated
data. Preliminary data are not required, particularly in applications
proposing pilot or feasibility studies.
2.A. Additional Review
Criteria:
In addition to the above criteria, the following items will continue
to be considered in the determination of scientific merit and the priority
score:
Protection
of Human Subjects from Research Risk: The involvement of human subjects
and protections from research risk relating to their participation in the
proposed research will be assessed. See item 6 of the Research Plan component
of the SF424 (R&R).
Inclusion
of Women, Minorities and Children in Research: The
adequacy of plans to include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic
groups (and subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of
the research will be assessed. Plans for the recruitment and retention of
subjects will also be evaluated. See item 7 of the Research Plan component of
the SF424 (R&R).
Care and Use of Vertebrate Animals in
Research: If vertebrate animals are to be used in the project, the five items
described under item 11 of the Research Plan component of the SF424 (R&R)
will be assessed.
Biohazards: If materials or
procedures are proposed that are potentially hazardous to research personnel
and/or the environment, determine if the proposed protection is adequate.
2.B. Additional
Review Considerations
Budget
and Period of Support: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the
appropriateness of the requested period of support in relation to the proposed
research may be assessed by the reviewers. Is the effort listed for the PD/PI
appropriate for the work proposed? Is each budget category realistic and
justified in terms of the aims and methods?
2.C.
Sharing Research Data
Not applicable
2.D. Sharing Research Resources
NIH policy requires that grant awardee recipients make unique research resources readily available for research purposes to qualified individuals within the scientific community after publication (See the NIH Grants Policy Statement http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part7.htm#_Toc54600131). Investigators responding to this funding opportunity should include a sharing research resources plan addressing how unique research resources will be shared or explain why sharing is not possible.
Program staff will be responsible for the administrative review of the plan for sharing research resources.
The adequacy of the resources sharing plan will be considered by Program staff of the funding organization when making recommendations about funding applications. Program staff may negotiate modifications of the data and resource sharing plans with the awardee before recommending funding of an application. The final version of the data and resource sharing plans negotiated by both will become a condition of the award of the grant. The effectiveness of the resource sharing will be evaluated as part of the administrative review of each Non-Competing Grant Progress Report (PHS 2590). See Section VI.3. , Reporting.
Model Organism Sharing Plan: Reviewers are asked to assess the sharing plan in an administrative note. The sharing plan itself should be discussed after the application is scored. Whether a sharing plan is reasonable can be determined by the reviewers on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the organism, the timeline, the applicant's decision to distribute the resource or deposit it in a repository, and other relevant considerations. For the R03 mechanism, the presence or adequacy of a plan should not enter into the scoring of the application.
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
Although there is no immediate acknowledgement of the receipt of an application, applicants generally are notified of the review and funding assignment within 8 weeks.
Section VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
After the peer review of the application is completed,
the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written
critique) via the NIH eRA
Commons.
If the application
is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time"
information from the applicant. For details, applicants may refer to the NIH
Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and
Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General.
A formal
notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the
applicant organization. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the
authorizing document. Once all administrative and programmatic issues have been
resolved, the NoA will be generated via email notification from the awarding
component to the grantee business official.
Selection of an
application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs
incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may
be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs. See Also Section IV.5., Funding Restrictions.
2. Administrative and
National Policy Requirements
All NIH grant and
cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH
Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards,
Subpart A: General and Part
II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions
for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities.
The following Terms and Conditions
will be incorporated in the NoA and will be provided to the PD/PI as well as
to the appropriate institutional official, at the time of award.
3.
Reporting
When
multiple years are involved, awardees will be required to submit the Non-Competing Grant Progress Report
(PHS 2590) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Section VII. Agency Contacts
We encourage your inquiries concerning this funding
opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential
applicants. Inquiries may fall into three areas: scientific/research, peer
review, and financial or grants management issues:
1. Scientific/Research Contacts:
Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo, MD, MSc, PhD
Senior
Advisor on Women's Health
Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality
John M. Eisenberg Building
540
Gaither Road
Rockville, Maryland 20850
Telephone
(301) 427-1550
Fax (301)
427-1562
Email: rcorrea@ahrq.gov
Sabra F.
Woolley, Ph.D.
Program
Manager
Health
Communication and Informatics Branch
Behavioral
Research Program
Division
of Cancer Control and Population Sciences
National
Cancer Institute
6130
Executive Boulevard, Room 4078
Bethesda Maryland 20892
Telephone:
(301) 435-4589
Fax:
(301) 480-2087
Email: sabra_woolley@nih.gov
Jeffrey
W. Elias, Ph.D.
Health
Scientist Administrator
Chief,
Cognitive Aging
Behavioral
and Social Research Program (BSR)
National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health
7201
Wisconsin Ave. #533
Bethesda, Md. 20892-9205
Telephone:
(301) 402-4156
Email: eliasj@nia.nih.gov
Grace
C.Y. Peng, Ph.D.
Program
Director
Division
of Discovery Science & Technology
National
Institute of Biomedical Imaging & Bioengineering
6707 Democracy
Blvd., Suite 200, MSC 5469
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone:
301-451-4778
Fax:
301-480-1614
Email: penggr@mail.nih.gov
Daniel B.
Berch, Ph.D.
Child
Development and Behavior Branch
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
6100
Executive Blvd., Room 4B05
Bethesda, MD 20892-7510
Telephone:
(301) 402-0699
Fax:
(301) 480-0230
Email: berchd2@mail.nih.gov
Patricia
S. Bryant, Ph.D.
Division
of Clinical Research
National
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Bldg. 45
Rm. 4AS-43A
Bethesda, MD 20892-6401
Telephone:
(301) 594-2095
Fax:
(301) 480-8322
Email: Patricia.Bryant@nih.gov
(Note:
Appropriate NIDCR contact if application emphasizes behavioral or social
science methods and issues)
Ruth
Nowjack-Raymer, MPH, PhD
Clinical
Research Branch
National
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Bldg. 45
Rm. 4AS-43J
Bethesda, MD 20892-6401
Telephone:
301-594-5394
Fax:
301-480-8322
Email: ruth.nowjack-raymer@nih.gov
(Note:
Appropriate NIDCR contact if application emphasizes health disparities)
Dr. Sanford Garfield
Biometry
and Behavioral Research Program
Division
of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases (DDEMD)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
2
Democracy Plaza, Room 685
6707
Democracy Blvd
Bethesda, MD 20892-5460
Telephone:
301-594-8803
Email: sg50o@nih.gov
Elizabeth
Ginexi, Ph.D.
Health
Scientist Administrator
Prevention
Research Branch
Division
of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention Research (DESPR)
National
Institute on Drug Abuse
6001
Executive Blvd,
Room 5185
Rockville, MD 20892
Telephone:
(301) 402-1755
Email: Lginexi@nida.nih.gov
Kimberly
Gray, Ph.D.
Susceptibility
and Population Health Branch
Division
of Extramural Research and Training
National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
MD EC-21
111
Alexander Drive
P.O. Box 12233
Research
Triangle Park,
NC 27709-2233
Telephone:
(919) 541-0293
Fax: (919)
316-4606
Email: gray6@niehs.nih.gov
David
Stoff, Ph.D.
Chief, HIV
& Mentally Ill Program
Division
of Mental Disorders, Behavioral Research and AIDS
National
Institute of Mental Health
6001
Executive Blvd.
Room 6210
MSC 9619
Bethesda, MD 20892-9619
Telephone:
(301)443-4625
Email: dstoff@mail.nih.gov
(Note:
Appropriate NIMH contact for applicants interested in promoting health literacy
about the causes, risk for, and diagnosis of mental disorders or in health
literacy about HIV/AIDS.)
Carmen P.
Moten, M.P.H., Ph.D.
Chief,
Primary Care in Mental Health Services Research Program
Chief,
Disparities in Mental Health Services Research Program
Division
of Services and Intervention Research
National
Institute of Mental Health
Neuroscience Center, Room 7130
6001
Executive Boulevard, MSC 9631
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9631
Telephone:
(301) 443-3364
Fax: (301)443-4045
Email: cmoten@mail.nih.gov
(Note:
Appropriate NIMH contact for applicants interested in promoting health literacy
in the context of mental health services.)
Dr.
Hua-Chuan Sim
NLM
Extramural Programs
National
Library of Medicine
Rockledge
1, Suite 301
6705
Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone:
(301) 594.4882
Fax: (301)
402-2952
Email: simh@mail.nih.gov
Susan
Solomon, Ph.D.
Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
Office of
the Director
National
Institutes of Health
31 Center
Drive Rm.
B2B37, MSC 2027
Bethesda MD 20892-2027
Telephone:
(301) 496-0979
Fax: (301)
402-1150
E-mail: SSolomon@NIH.Gov
2. Peer Review Contacts:
Michael Micklin, Ph.D.
Chief
Risk,
Prevention, and Health Behavior Integrated Review Group
SRA for
SPIP Study Section
Center
for Scientific Review
National
Institutes of Health
6701
Rockledge Drive, Rm. 3136 MSC 7759
Bethesda, MD 20892-7759 (20817 for overnight mail)
Telephone:
(301) 435-1258
Fax: (301)
594-6363
Email: micklinm@csr.nih.gov
3. Financial or Grants Management Contacts:
Crystal Wolfrey
Grants
Administration Branch
National
Cancer Institute
Building
EPS, Room 243
Rockville, MD 20852
Telephone:
(301) 496-8634
Fax: (301)
496-8601
Email: crystal.wolfrey@nih.gov
Angelos
Bacas
Grants
Management Branch
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
6100
Executive Boulevard, Room 8A07F, MSC 7510
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7510
Telephone:
(301) 435-6976
Fax:
(301) 480-4783
Email: ab329b@nih.gov
Mr. Brian Albertini
Grants
Management Branch
National
Institute of Mental Health
6001
Executive Boulevard, Room 6115
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone:
(301) 443-0004
Fax: (301)
443-0219
Email: albertib2@mail.nih.gov
Section VIII. Other Information
Required Federal Citations
Use of Animals in
Research:
Recipients of PHS support for activities involving live, vertebrate animals
must comply with PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/PHSPolicyLabAnimals.pdf)
as mandated by the Health Research Extension Act of 1985 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/hrea1985.htm),
and the USDA Animal Welfare Regulations (http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/usdaleg1.htm)
as applicable.
Human Subjects Protection:
Federal regulations (45CFR46) require that applications and proposals involving
human subjects must be evaluated with reference to the risks to the subjects,
the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the
research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained
or to be gained (http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm).
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan:
Data and safety monitoring is required for all types of clinical trials,
including physiologic toxicity and dose-finding studies (Phase I); efficacy
studies (Phase II); efficacy, effectiveness and comparative trials (Phase III).
Monitoring should be commensurate with risk. The establishment of data and
safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) is required for multi-site clinical trials
involving interventions that entail potential risks to the participants (NIH
Policy for Data and Safety Monitoring, NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html).
Sharing Research Data:
Investigators
submitting an NIH application seeking $500,000 or more in direct costs in any
single year are expected to include a plan for data sharing or state why this
is not possible (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing).
Investigators
should seek guidance from their institutions, on issues related to
institutional policies and local IRB rules, as well as local, State and Federal
laws and regulations, including the Privacy Rule. Reviewers will consider the
data sharing plan but will not factor the plan into the determination of the
scientific merit or the priority score.
Access
to Research Data through the Freedom of Information Act:
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to
provide access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a project that is
supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and
officially by a Federal agency in support of an action that has the force and
effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is
important for applicants to understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH
has provided guidance at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm.
Applicants may wish to place data collected under this funding opportunity in a
public archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the
distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should
include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include information
about this in the budget justification section of the application. In addition,
applicants should think about how to structure informed consent statements and
other human subjects procedures given the potential for wider use of data
collected under this award.
Sharing of Model Organisms:
NIH is committed to support efforts that encourage sharing of important
research resources including the sharing of model organisms for biomedical
research (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/model_organism/index.htm).
At the same time the NIH recognizes the rights of grantees and contractors to
elect and retain title to subject inventions developed with Federal funding
pursuant to the Bayh Dole Act (see the NIH Grants Policy Statement http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/index.htm).
Beginning October 1, 2004, all investigators submitting an NIH application or
contract proposal are expected to include in the application/proposal a
description of a specific plan for sharing and distributing unique model
organism research resources generated using NIH funding or state why such
sharing is restricted or not possible. This will permit other researchers to
benefit from the resources developed with public funding. The inclusion of a
model organism sharing plan is not subject to a cost threshold in any year and
is expected to be included in all applications where the development of model
organisms is anticipated.
Inclusion of Women And Minorities in Clinical Research:
It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their
sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research
projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided indicating
that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or
the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization
Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). All investigators proposing
clinical research should read the "NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women
and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html);
a complete copy of the updated Guidelines is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm.
The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical
research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB
standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical
trials consistent with the SF424 (R&R) application; and updated roles and
responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy
continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) all
applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans
to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender
and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and b)
investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting analyses,
as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group differences.
Inclusion of Children as Participants in Clinical Research:
The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21)
must be included in all clinical research, conducted or supported by the NIH,
unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the
"NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as
participants in research involving human subjects (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm).
Required Education on the Protection of Human Subject Participants:
NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants
for all investigators submitting NIH applications for research involving human
subjects and individuals designated as key personnel. The policy is available
at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESC):
Criteria for Federal funding of research on hESCs can be found at http://stemcells.nih.gov/index.asp and at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-005.html.
Only research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human Embryonic
Stem Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal funding (http://escr.nih.gov). It is the responsibility
of the applicant to provide in the project description and elsewhere in the
application as appropriate, the official NIH identifier(s) for the hESC line(s)
to be used in the proposed research. Applications that do not provide this
information will be returned without review.
NIH Public Access Policy:
NIH-funded investigators are requested to submit to the NIH manuscript
submission (NIHMS) system (http://www.nihms.nih.gov)
at PubMed Central (PMC) an electronic version of the author's final manuscript
upon acceptance for publication, resulting from research supported in whole or
in part with direct costs from NIH. The author's final manuscript is defined as
the final version accepted for journal publication, and includes all
modifications from the publishing peer review process.
NIH is requesting that authors submit manuscripts resulting from 1) currently
funded NIH research projects or 2) previously supported NIH research projects
if they are accepted for publication on or after May 2, 2005. The NIH Public
Access Policy applies to all research grant and career development award
mechanisms, cooperative agreements, contracts, Institutional and Individual
Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards, as well as NIH intramural
research studies. The Policy applies to peer-reviewed, original research
publications that have been supported in whole or in part with direct costs
from NIH, but it does not apply to book chapters, editorials, reviews, or
conference proceedings. Publications resulting from non-NIH-supported research
projects should not be submitted.
For more information
about the Policy or the submission process, please visit the NIH Public Access
Policy Web site at http://publicaccess.nih.gov/ and view the Policy or other Resources and Tools, including the Authors' Manual.
Standards
for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information:
The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued final modification to
the "Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health
Information", the "Privacy Rule", on August 14, 2002. The
Privacy Rule is a Federal regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually
identifiable health information, and is administered and enforced by the DHHS
Office for Civil Rights (OCR).
Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside
with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR Website (http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/) provides
information on the Privacy Rule, including a complete Regulation Text and a set
of decision tools on "Am I a covered entity?" Information on the
impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH processes involving the review,
funding, and progress monitoring of grants, cooperative agreements, and
research contracts can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html.
URLs in NIH Grant Applications or Appendices:
All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within
specified page limitations. Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation,
Internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide information necessary
to the review because reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet
sites. Furthermore, we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be
compromised when they directly access an Internet site.
Healthy People 2010:
The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion
and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS-led
national activity for setting priority areas. This PA is related to one or more
of the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy
People 2010" at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
Authority and Regulations:
This program is described in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance and is not subject to the intergovernmental
review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public
Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal
Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. All awards are subject
to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations
described in the NIH Grants
Policy Statement.
The
PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace
and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law
103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities
(or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine
education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development
services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to
protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Loan Repayment Programs:
NIH encourages applications for educational loan repayment from qualified
health professionals who have made a commitment to pursue a research career
involving clinical, pediatric, contraception, infertility, and health
disparities related areas. The LRP is an important component of NIH's efforts
to recruit and retain the next generation of researchers by providing the means
for developing a research career unfettered by the burden of student loan debt.
Note that an NIH grant is not required for eligibility and concurrent career award
and LRP applications are encouraged. The periods of career award and LRP award
may overlap providing the LRP recipient with the required commitment of time
and effort, as LRP awardees must commit at least 50% of their time (at least 20
hours per week based on a 40 hour week) for two years to the research. For
further information, please see: http://www.lrp.nih.gov.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
| ||||||
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health® |