and Human Services (HHS)
EXPIRED
NLM RESOURCE GRANT IN BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS/BIOINFORMATICS (P41)
RELEASE DATE: August 13, 2004
PA NUMBER: PAR-04-142 - June 11, 2008 - This PAR has been reissued as (RFA-LM-08-001).
(This PA has been suspended until further notice, see NOT-LM-05-001)
(See, NOT-LM-04-010 for clarification of scope.)
EXPIRATION DATE: February 7, 2005
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATION:
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
(http://www.nih.gov)
COMPONENT OF PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATION:
National Library of Medicine (NLM)
(http://www.nlm.nih.gov)
CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER(S): 93.879 Medical Library
Assistance
THIS PA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
o Purpose of the PA
o Research Objectives
o Mechanism(s) of Support
o Eligible Institutions
o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators
o Special Requirements
o Where to Send Inquiries
o Submitting an Application
o Supplementary Instructions
o Peer Review Process
o Review Criteria
o Award Criteria
o Required Federal Citations
PURPOSE OF THIS PA
The purpose of this program announcement is to reissue and update the
National Library of Medicine’s grant program for support of the development,
maintenance and dissemination of databases or software tools that are unique,
of major importance to an important research domain, and sufficiently mature
to have a broad, describable community of users. These tools and resources
should advance research or practice in the biomedical sciences, clinical
medicine or health services research. To quality for support, biomedical
informatics resources software, algorithms, knowledge resources must be
of proven value to a large community of users. The NLM Biomedical Informatics
Resource grant supports ongoing research, development and maintenance of the
tool or resource, user training and services, and wide dissemination of the
tool or resource.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
NLM defines biomedical informatics as the intersection of basic informational
and computing sciences with an application domain in biomedicine, as
discussed in the work of the American College of Medical Informatics
referenced below. The term biomedical informatics encompasses the closely-
aligned field of bioinformatics, which can be defined as the intersection of
basic informational and computer sciences with an application domain in
biological/biochemical sciences. NLM’s research funding centers on
understanding data, information and knowledge their nature, forms and uses
in the domains of health and basic biological sciences. In clinical
medicine, health services administration, education and basic biomedical
sciences, there are information needs and problems that transcend
organizational, regional and national boundaries. Biomedical informatics
resources software, algorithms and knowledge resources that are of proven
value to a large community of users, should be improved, sustained and widely
shared. The kinds of tools and resources appropriate for support by NLM’s
Biomedical Informatics Resource grant program include:
o Software for information and knowledge processing, including natural
language processing, information extraction, integration of data from
heterogeneous sources or domains, event detection, feature recognition;
o Tools for analyzing and/or storing very large datasets, including genomic
and proteomic data; data supporting clinical trials; and other data used in
clinical or health services research;
o Systems for knowledge representation, including vocabularies, ontologies,
simulations and virtual reality;
o Algorithms for linking clinical and genomic information to benefit health
care;
o Technology-based tools for clinical decision support, error reduction,
outcomes analysis, and the delivery of usable, useful information at the
point of care;
o Effective human-machine interfaces, retrieval tools and intelligent agents
for health and scientific information;
o Unique collections of data, information or knowledge that support learning,
decision making, research and administration at national /international
levels;
o Tools and resources that foster translation of research findings into
health care practice.
NLM’s Biomedical Informatics Resource Grant can not be used to support
research and development intended as proof of concept, to ascertain
feasibility, or to underwrite the initial development of a tool or resource.
NLM offers several kinds of informatics research grants. Applicants who wish
to undertake biomedical informatics research, to develop and test novel
information technologies, or to perform feasibility or proof-of-concept
studies, should use one of NLM’s other research grant mechanisms.
NLM’s Biomedical Informatics Resource grants are not intended to support
research projects that utilize a tool or database being supported through
this resource grant program. Such projects should seek funding through
customary NIH research grant mechanisms. These grants are not intended to
support tools and resources that duplicate activities of the National Library
of Medicine.
MECHANISM(S) OF SUPPORT
This PA will use the NIH P41 award mechanism. As an applicant, you will be
solely responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed
project. The applicant may request a project period of up to 4 years. These
grants may renewed by submission of a competing continuation application.
The budget request should be tailored to the needs of the project. Applicants
who wish to request$500,000 or more in direct costs per year must obtain
permission in advance from NLM’s Extramural Programs Division. Applications
received without proof of this advance permission will be returned without
review.
This PA uses just-in-time concepts. It also uses the modular budgeting as
well as the non-modular budgeting formats (see
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm). Specifically, if
you are submitting an application with direct costs in each year of $250,000
or less, use the modular budget format. Otherwise follow the instructions
for non-modular budget research grant applications. This program does not
require cost sharing as defined in the current NIH Grants Policy Statement at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part2.htm.
ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS
You may submit (an) application(s) if your institution has any of the
following characteristics:
o For-profit or non-profit organizations
o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals,
and laboratories
o Units of State and local governments
o Eligible agencies of the Federal government
o Foreign institutions are not eligible to apply--however, domestic
applications with foreign components are permitted.
INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO BECOME PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS
Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry
out the proposed research is invited to work with their institution to
develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial
and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always
encouraged to apply for NIH programs.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
NLM’s Biomedical Informatics Resource grants provide funds to support an
operations center whose functions include: (1) maintenance of scalable,
appropriate infrastructure to support local and distant users; (2) support
services and/or collaboration with users and stakeholders; (3) research and
development to improve the longevity, effectiveness and value of the
resource; (4) user training; and (5) dissemination of information about the
resource. Applicants must provide plans for each of these areas.
1. Maintenance of the resource: A unique, widely-used resource requires
expertise, equipment and a plan to keep up with the pace of technological
change and evolving approaches to information handling. Such maintenance is a
principal purpose of NLM’s Biomedical Informatics Resource grant, and
evidence of plans to assure continued usefulness and sustainability are a
major component of the application for support.
2. Service: Assisting the biomedical investigators and clinicians who use or
want to use a tool or database is a fundamental activity of a biomedical
informatics resource center. Providing access to the resource's technology
should include techniques for helping users obtain, install and use a tool or
database, and offering consultation and technical assistance.
3. Technological Research and Development: A biomedical informatics resource
requires continuing development of its features and components to sustain
value for the user community, and to meet changing needs of health care and
biomedical research. Such research and development may involve modification
or even reconceptualization of databases and software. Informatics research
and development to improve a biomedical informatics resource is most
effective when it responds to perceived, unfulfilled needs of those who use
it.
4. Training: This includes educational programs designed to inform the user
community about the features of a tool or database, demonstrating new
features as they are developed, and attracting new users to the community.
Training may encompass many techniques, including short courses, workshops,
and individual training of visiting scientists and students. Applicants
should include some training approaches that involve in-person, hands-on
training.
5. Dissemination: This activity involves informing the scientific community
about the resource and its potential for science by publishing articles or
books, conducting conferences, distributing software products, or
transferring technologies to industry where they will be distributed widely.
In biomedical informatics resource centers that are developing software,
emphasis should be placed on producing portable software. Open source
software is strongly encouraged as is cooperation with complementary
resources. Biomedical informatics resource centers that are providing
databases should have techniques for supporting localization of the resource,
and open access policies. Requests to charge for access must be approved in
advance by NLM staff.
Applicants for this grant are strongly encouraged to establish an advisory
committee for the resource. Members of this committee should be knowledgeable
about the resource's technology and its value to the user community. The
committee should have members that represent the geographical regions served,
and the types of users served. The chair of the Advisory committee should
have knowledge of the resource's value, but should not be a member of the
resource center’s staff or the major external user of the resource. The
Advisory Committee should provide guidance to the principal investigator on
all aspects of the 5 areas discussed above, including future directions,
growth, marketing, guidelines for the resource's use, and sustainability
plans. The Advisory Committee should meet at least annually. Funds should be
budgeted to support yearly meetings of the committee. Proposed members of
the Advisory Committee should not be contacted in advance of the application.
Applicants should plan for one progress visit each year, to discuss and
coordinate plans and activities with NLM.
WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES
We encourage your inquiries concerning this PA and welcome the opportunity to
answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into three
areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management
issues:
o Direct your questions about scientific/research issues to:
Dr. Valerie Florance
Deputy Director
Extramural Programs Division
National Library of Medicine
Rockledge 1, Suite 301
6705 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: (301) 594-4882
FAX: 301-402-2952
Email: [email protected]
o Direct your questions about peer review issues to:
Dr. Hua-Chuan Sim
Scientific Review Administrator
Extramural Programs Division
National Library of Medicine
Rockledge 1, Suite 301
6705 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: (301) 496-4253
FAX: 301-402-2952
Email: [email protected]
o Direct your questions about financial or grants management matters to:
Dwight Mowery
Grants Management Officer
Extramural Programs Division
National Library of Medicine
Rockledge 1, Suite 301
6705 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: (301) 496-4221
FAX: 301-402-2952
Email: [email protected]
SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION
Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant application
instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). Applications must have a Dun and
Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number as the
Universal Identifier when applying for Federal grants or cooperative
agreements. The D&B number can be obtained by calling (866) 705-5711 or
through the web site at http://www.dunandbradstreet.com/. The D&B number
should be entered on line 11 of the face page of the PHS 398 form. The PHS
398 is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html
in an interactive format. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo,
Telephone (301) 710-0267, Email: [email protected].
The title and number of this program announcement must be typed on line 2 of
the face page of the application form and the YES box must be checked.
APPLICATION RECEIPT DATES: Applications submitted in response to this program
announcement will be accepted at the standard application deadlines, which
are available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/dates.htm. Application
deadlines are also indicated in the PHS 398 application kit.
SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR MODULAR BUDGET GRANT APPLICATIONS: Applications
requesting up to $250,000 per year in direct costs must be submitted in a
modular budget grant format. The modular budget grant format simplifies the
preparation of the budget in these applications by limiting the level of
budgetary detail. Applicants request direct costs in $25,000 modules.
Section C of the research grant application instructions for the PHS 398
(rev. 5/2001) at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html
includes step-by-step guidance for preparing modular grants. Additional
information on modular grants is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm.
SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICATIONS REQUESTING $500,000 OR MORE PER YEAR:
Applications requesting $500,000 or more in direct costs for any year must
include a cover letter identifying the NIH staff member within one of NIH
institutes or centers who has agreed to accept assignment of the application.
Applicants requesting $500,000 or more must carry out the following steps:
1) Contact the IC program staff at least 6 weeks before submitting the
application, i.e., as you are developing plans for the study;
2) Obtain agreement from the IC staff that the IC will accept your
application for consideration for award; and,
3) Identify, in a cover letter sent with the application, the staff member
and IC who agreed to accept assignment of the application.
This policy applies to all investigator-initiated new (type 1), competing
continuation (type 2), competing supplement, or any amended or revised
version of these grant application types. Additional information on this
policy is available in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, October 19,
2001 at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-004.html.
SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH: Submit a signed, typewritten original of
the application, including the checklist, and five signed photocopies in one
package to:
Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD 20892-7710
Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)
APPLICATION PROCESSING: Applications must be mailed on or before the receipt
dates described at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/submissionschedule.htm. The CSR will not
accept any application in response to this PA that is essentially the same as
one currently pending initial review unless the applicant withdraws the
pending application. The CSR will not accept any application that is
essentially the same as one already reviewed. This does not preclude the
submission of a substantial revision of an unfunded version of an application
already reviewed, but such application must include an Introduction
addressing the previous critique.
Although there is no immediate acknowledgement of the receipt of an
application, applicants are generally notified of the review and funding
assignment within 8 weeks.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Applications submitted for this PAR will be assigned on the basis of
established PHS referral guidelines. Applications that are complete and
responsive to the PAR will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by
an appropriate peer review group convened by the NLM in accordance with the
review criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, all
applications will:
o Undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have
the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of applications under
review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score
o Receive a written critique
o Receive a second level review by the Board of Regents of the National
Library of Medicine.
REVIEW CRITERIA
The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of
biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In
the written comments, reviewers will be asked to evaluate application in
order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a
substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. The scientific review
group will address and consider each of the following criteria in assigning
the application’s overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each
application.
o Significance
o Approach
o Innovation
o Investigator
o Environment
The application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged
likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority
score. For example, an investigator may propose to carry out important work
that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move a field
forward.
SIGNIFICANCE: Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of
the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What
will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive
this field?
APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses
adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the
project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider
alternative tactics?
INNOVATION: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or methods?
Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing
paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies?
INVESTIGATOR: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited to
carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level
of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)?
ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done
contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take
advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful
collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support?
ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA: In addition to the above criteria, the following
items will be considered in the determination of scientific merit and the
priority score:
A Biomedical Informatics Resource grants is not a research grant, thus the
traditional NIH criteria describe above are used, but modified to suit the
purposes of the grant program. In a well-developed Biomedical Informatics
Resource grant application, the following criteria are of high importance:
o Significance: Convincing evidence that the resource is unique and of
substantial value to biomedical research or practice
o Approach: Provisions are made for insightful, timely development, sound
maintenance, quality assurance, and project evaluation
o Innovation: The plans for improvement of the resource incorporate new
techniques and technologies
o Investigator: An appropriate and sufficient array of expertise is
available for planning, training and service
o Environment: The technological infrastructure is adequate to meet
current needs and scalable to meet future needs.
o Users: Evidence of a broad, describable existing community of users.
In addition, reviewers will expect to see an evaluation plan that documents
(1) sustained use by the community of users for which a resource is intended,
(2) increasing number of new users, (3) examples of advances in research or
practice that can be traced to the resource.
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FROM RESEARCH RISK: The involvement of human
subjects and protections from research risk relating to their participation
in the proposed research will be assessed. (See criteria included in the
section on Federal Citations, below).
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
INCLUSION OF WOMEN, MINORITIES AND CHILDREN IN RESEARCH: The adequacy of
plans to include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic groups
(and subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the
research will be assessed. Plans for the recruitment and retention of
subjects will also be evaluated. (See Inclusion Criteria in the sections on
Federal Citations, below).
CARE AND USE OF VERTEBRATE ANIMALS IN RESEARCH: If vertebrate animals are to
be used in the project, the five items described under Section f of the PHS
398 research grant application instructions (rev. 5/2001) will be assessed.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS
Sharing Research Data
Applicants requesting $500,000 or more in direct costs in any year of the
proposed research are expected to include a data sharing plan in their
application. The reasonableness of the data sharing plan or the rationale for
not sharing research data will be assessed by the reviewers. However,
reviewers will not factor the proposed data sharing plan into the
determination of scientific merit or priority score.
BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested period
of support in relation to the proposed research.
AWARD CRITERIA
Applications submitted in response to a PA will compete for available funds
with all other recommended applications. The following will be considered in
making funding decisions:
o Scientific merit of the proposed project as determined by peer review
o Availability of funds
o Relevance to program priorities
REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS
ANIMAL WELFARE PROTECTION: Recipients of PHS support for activities
involving live, vertebrate animals must comply with PHS Policy on Humane Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/PHSPolicyLabAnimals.pdf), as
mandated by the Health Research Extension Act of 1985
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/hrea1985.htm), and the USDA
Animal Welfare Regulations
(http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/usdaleg1.htm), as applicable.
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION: Federal regulations (45CFR46) require that
applications and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated with
reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against
these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and
others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained.
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING PLAN: Data and safety monitoring is required for
all types of clinical trials, including physiologic, toxicity, and dose-
finding studies (phase I); efficacy studies (phase II), efficacy,
effectiveness and comparative trials (phase III). The establishment of data
and safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) is required for multi-site clinical
trials involving interventions that entail potential risk to the
participants. (NIH Policy for Data and Safety Monitoring, NIH Guide for
Grants and Contracts, June 12, 1998:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html).
SHARING RESEARCH DATA: Investigators submitting an NIH application seeking
$500,000 or more in direct costs in any single year are expected to include a
plan for data sharing or state why this is not possible.
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing
Investigators should seek guidance from their institutions, on issues related
to institutional policies, local IRB rules, as well as local, state and
Federal laws and regulations, including the Privacy Rule. Reviewers will
consider the data sharing plan but will not factor the plan into the
determination of the scientific merit or the priority score.
INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH: It is the policy of
the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations
must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a
clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is
inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the
research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section
492B of Public Law 103-43).
All investigators proposing clinical research should read the "NIH Guidelines
for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research -
Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts
on October 9, 2001
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html);
a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm.
The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical
research; updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB
standards; clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical
trials consistent with the new PHS Form 398; and updated roles and
responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy
continues to require for all NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials that: a)
all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of
plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by
sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable;
and b) investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting
analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group
differences.
INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS:
The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of
21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported
by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include
them.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the
"NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as participants in
research involving human subjects that is available at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm.
REQUIRED EDUCATION ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECT PARTICIPANTS: NIH
policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants for
all investigators submitting NIH proposals for research involving human
subjects. You will find this policy announcement in the NIH Guide for Grants
and Contracts Announcement, dated June 5, 2000, at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
PUBLIC ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT: The
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to
provide public access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a
project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2)
cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action
that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed
through FOIA. It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope
of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm.
Applicants may wish to place data collected under this PA in a public
archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the
distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should
include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include
information about this in the budget justification section of the
application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure
informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the
potential for wider use of data collected under this award.
STANDARDS FOR PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIABLE HEALTH INFORMATION: The
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued final modification to
the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information ,
the Privacy Rule, on August 14, 2002. The Privacy Rule is a federal
regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA) of 1996 that governs the protection of individually identifiable
health information, and is administered and enforced by the DHHS Office for
Civil Rights (OCR).
Decisions about applicability and implementation of the Privacy Rule reside
with the researcher and his/her institution. The OCR website
(http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/) provides information on the Privacy Rule, including
a complete Regulation Text and a set of decision tools on Am I a covered
entity? Information on the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on NIH
processes involving the review, funding, and progress monitoring of grants,
cooperative agreements, and research contracts can be found at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-025.html.
URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES: All applications and proposals
for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations.
Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, Internet addresses (URLs)
should not be used to provide information necessary to the review because
reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites. Furthermore,
we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be compromised when they
directly access an Internet site.
HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to
achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy
People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This PA
is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may
obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at http://www.healthypeople.gov/.
AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS: This program is described in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance at http://www.cfda.gov/ and is not subject to the
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health
Systems Agency review. Awards are made under the authorization of Sections
301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284
and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. All
awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other
considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. The NIH Grants
Policy Statement can be found at
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm
The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free
workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition,
Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in
certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which
regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early
childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent
with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of
the American people.
REFERENCES:
1. Charles P. Friedman, Russ B. Altman, Isaac S. Kohane, Kathleen A.
McCormick, Perry L. Miller, Judy G. Ozbolt, Edward H. Shortliffe, Gary D.
Stormo, M. Cleat Szczepaniak, David Tuck, and Jeffrey Williamson Training the
Next Generation of Informaticians: The Impact of "BISTI" and Bioinformatics A
Report from the American College of Medical Informatics J. Am. Med. Inform.
Assoc. 2004;11(3):167-172.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
|
|||
|
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health® |
||||||