EXPIRED
DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES (PHASED INNOVATION AWARD) Release Date: April 27, 2000 PA NUMBER: PAR-00-089 National Cancer Institute National Center for Research Resources Letter of Intent Receipt Dates: June 14, 2000 and February 9, 2001 Application Receipt Dates: July 19, 2000 and March 16, 2001 PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute (NCI) invites applications on the development of novel image acquisition or enhancement methods, incorporating limited pilot or feasibility evaluations using either pre-clinical models or clinical studies. This initiative is intended to facilitate the development of novel imaging technologies for early detection, screening, diagnosis and image guided treatment of cancer and other diseases. The intent is to stimulate: (a) the development of highly innovative image acquisition and enhancement methods, including high risk/high gain research on technologies that exploit our knowledge of the molecular basis of cancer or other disease, and (b) the integration of these emerging technologies with traditional imaging methods for more effective health care delivery. The motivation for this Program Announcement (PA) is that current technologies for the molecular analysis of disease are largely restricted to in-vitro methods and need to be extended to the in-vivo situation. Furthermore, the use of molecular probes or tracers for imaging molecular events in pre-clinical or human investigations is considered essential for detection of molecular changes in-vivo. The development of innovative high- resolution imaging methods at the cellular or molecular scales is needed, with a particular emphasis on identification and characterization of either the early formation of disease processes or early molecular changes during intervention or therapy. This solicitation (Development of Novel Imaging Technologies) will utilize the Phased Innovation Award Mechanism that is designed to encourage technology development. Specific features of this mechanism include: o Single submission and evaluation of both the R21 and R33 phases as one application. An R33 application alone may be submitted. o Expedited transition of feasibility phase (R21) to development phase (R33), based on completion of negotiated Milestones. o Flexible staging of feasibility (R21) and development (R33) phases. Industry applications or industry partnerships with other groups are encouraged. Small businesses are encouraged to respond to a parallel PA PAR-00-090 (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-00-090.html) of identical scientific scope that uses the SBIR and STTR mechanisms, but with similar expedited review and transition, as well as cost and duration limits, as the Phased Innovation Awards. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS led national activity for setting priority areas. This PA, Development of Novel Imaging Technologies (Phased Innovation Award), is related to the priority area of cancer and several other priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople/. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Applications may be submitted by foreign and domestic, for-profit and non- profit organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, laboratories, companies, units of State and local governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government. Racial/ethnic minority individuals, women, and persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply as principal investigators. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT The following are points to note about the mechanism of support and its implementation: o Responsibility for the planning, direction, and execution of the proposed project will be solely that of the applicant. Awards will be administered under NIH grants policy as stated in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, NIH Publication Number 99-8, October 1998. o Support for this program will be through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant (R21) and the Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Phase 2 (R33). The R33 is a relatively new NIH grant mechanism that provides a second phase to support innovative exploratory and developmental research initiated under the R21 mechanism. Transition of the R21 to the R33 phase will be expedited and is dependent on completion of negotiated Milestones. o Under this PA, applicants can submit either a combined R21/R33 application (Phased Innovation Award application) or an R33 application alone, if feasibility can be documented, as described in the APPLICATION PROCEDURES section of this PA. o Applications for R21 support alone will not be accepted, but may be eligible to apply under PA-98-008 (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-98-008.html) or PAR-98-047 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-98-047.html) o The total project periods for an application submitted in response to this PA may not exceed the following durations: R21, 2 years, R33, 3 years, combined R21/R33 application, 4 years. In the combined application the R21 phase cannot extend beyond 2 years. o For combined R21/R33 applications, the R21 phase may not exceed $100,000 direct costs per year. R21 budgets can exceed this cap to accommodate Facilities and Administrative costs to subcontracts to the project. Although the R33 application has no official budgetary limit, applications requesting in excess of $500,000 direct costs in any single year of the grant period require prior approval by NCI or NCRR program staff before submission. o It is strongly recommended that applicants contact NCI or NCRR staff at an early stage of application development to convey critical information, such as potentially large budget requests or to discuss programmatic responsiveness of the proposed project. Early contact with NCI or NCRR staff is particularly helpful for this PA because it uses a relatively new grant mechanism (R33). Refer to the INQUIRIES sections of this PA for NCI and NCRR staff contacts. o The combined R21/R33 application offers two advantages over the regular application process: 1. Single submission and evaluation of both the R21 and the R33 as one application. 2. Minimal or no funding gap between R21 and R33. The award of R33 funds will be based on program priorities, on the availability of funds and on successful completion of negotiated scientific Milestones as determined by NCI and NCRR staff in the context of peer review recommendations. To be eligible for the Phased Innovation Award, the R21 phase must include well-defined, quantifiable Milestones that will be used to judge the success of the proposed research, as well as a credible plan for the development of technology in the R33 phase. The Phased Innovation Award must have a separate section labeled Milestones at the end of the Research Plan of the R21 application. This section must include well-defined, quantifiable Milestones for completion of the R21 part of the application, a discussion of the suitability of the proposed Milestones for assessing the success in the R21 phase, and a discussion of the implications of successful completion of these Milestones for the proposed R33 study. Through a separate program announcement PAR-00-090 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-00-090.html), the NCI and NCRR are inviting applications for SBIR and STTR support, focusing on the same research areas as described in the RESEARCH OBJECTIVES section of this solicitation. For SBIR/STTR solicitation, the expedited NCI review and cost allowance policies and procedures will be identical to this PA. Qualified applicants are strongly encouraged to consider responding to the SBIR/STTR program announcement. SBIR and STTR application information is available at the following website: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/sbir.htm Potential applicants who believe that they may be eligible for the SBIR/STTR award should contact the NCI staff listed under INQUIRIES to discuss this issue. In addition, potential applicants are encouraged to access the PHS SBIR and STTR Omnibus Solicitation for information on eligibility requirements at the following website: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/sbirsttr1/index.htm BACKGROUND Significant advances in medical imaging technologies have been made over the last 25 years in such areas as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), nuclear medicine and ultrasound. However, these advances largely focused on structural or anatomic imaging at the organ or tissue level. There is clearly a need and opportunity now to stimulate the development and integration of novel imaging technologies that exploit our current knowledge of the genetic and molecular bases of cancer. Those molecular biological discoveries have great implications for prevention, detection and targeted therapy. Imaging technologies that can provide in vivo the same kind of cellular and molecular information that is currently available only from in vitro techniques would be very useful. This is commonly referred to as in vivo molecular imaging. Participants at several NCI-supported forums over the last few years [Imaging Sciences Working Group (ISWG) July 1997, Lung Imaging Workshop: Technology Transfer, Jan 1997, Computer Aided Diagnosis and 3D Image Analysis, Oct 1998, Quantitative In-Vivo Functional Imaging in Oncology, Jan 1999, Focus Group on Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) in Clinical Oncology, April 1999, and NIH BECON Symposium, June 1999] stressed the need for NCI to support bioengineering and technology development by academia and industry. The needs are to (a) promote the development of very novel (high risk, high gain) technologies, including continued support for their maturation and full exploitation, (b) promote system integration of technologies for targeted applications, and (c) improve technology transfer by promoting partnerships between academia and industry. Development of novel imaging technologies will require a multidisciplinary team approach with broad expertise in a variety of research areas. Such varied expertise, potentially including but not limited to, expertise in imaging physics, molecular and cellular biology, informatics and biostatistics exists in ongoing cancer centers and clinical trials cooperative groups. The coordination and collaboration of investigators from these various disciplines to demonstrate the utility and applicability of new imaging methods is considered to be a high priority. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The intent of this PA is to stimulate: (a) the development of highly innovative image acquisition and enhancement methods, including high risk/ high gain projects that exploit our expanding knowledge of the molecular basis of cancer and other diseases, and (b) the integration of these emerging technologies with traditional imaging modalities for more effective solutions for cancer and other diseases. In particular, the development of innovative high-resolution imaging methods at the cellular or molecular scales is needed, with emphasis on identification and characterization of either the early formation of disease or early molecular changes during intervention or therapy. For many technologies that have potential for molecular imaging, the use of probes or tracers is considered essential for detection of molecular changes in-vivo. The following clinical applications are appropriate for inclusion in proposed projects: *Imaging to detect early changes. The development of innovative high-resolution imaging methods at the cellular or molecular scales is encouraged, with a particular intent to identify and characterize pre-malignant abnormalities or other early changes. Novel solutions for in-vivo microscopic imaging sensors, or microscopic implanted devices with high spatial, contrast and temporal resolution are encouraged. Similarly the use of contrast enhancement methods and imaging probes is also encouraged. The imaging methodologies proposed should emphasize analysis of molecular events on the path to disease. *Large scale screening applications for cancer and other diseases. Development and optimization of efficient low-cost imaging systems for rapid and automated large-scale screening with the intent of achieving significantly higher sensitivity and specificity for cancer and other disease detection are encouraged. Applications could address significant innovative improvements to current imaging methods or new emerging imaging sensors. Research topics of interest include, but are not limited to, technologies for molecular imaging, means to significantly reduce imaging time or motion effects, use of novel contrast agents or imaging probes, and use of technologies that do not involve ionization radiation. System integration could include a variety of image processing techniques including temporal analysis of serial studies, close to real-time image processing, novel image display methods, and related imaging informatics and information reduction methods for more cost-effective solutions for screening. *Imaging for diagnosis, staging, or monitoring the effects of therapy. This initiative encourages the development of novel imaging methods such as functional or molecular imaging or spectroscopy methods that would significantly improve the specificity of diagnosis of cancer and other diseases, allow deterministic methods or patient-specific staging, or measure early effects of therapy. Examples of system integration would include image fusion or registration from the different modalities employed, development of software methods that would estimate the probability of malignancy or other specific disease identification, quantitative information for monitoring the effects of therapy, and close to real-time image analysis. *Image guided biopsy (IGB) and therapy (IGT). Novel approaches using imaging technologies are needed to significantly improve specificity, to identify lesion extent and microscopic involvement, and to minimize the tissue damage accompanying biopsy and therapy. Of particular interest are innovative approaches to IGB or IGT that include novel imaging sensors that provide information at the cellular or molecular level. Examples of system integration that are of interest include, but are not limited to, navigational systems, registration methods for several imaging modalities, real-time feedback mechanisms for controlling therapy or the use of methods that are adaptive or allow patient-specific optimization of treatment. This list is not meant to be all-inclusive and prospective applicants are encouraged to discuss program relevance issues with program staff cited under INQUIRIES. Partnerships of appropriate medical institutions with medical device manufacturers to facilitate the integration of system components are encouraged. INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their subpopulations must be included in all NIH supported biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects, unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification is provided that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research", which have been published in the Federal Register of March 28, 1994(FR 59 14508-14513) and in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, Volume 23, Number 11, March 18, 1994, available on the web at the following URL address: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-100.html INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS It is the policy of NIH that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are clear and compelling scientific and ethical reasons not to include them. This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for receipt dates after October 1, 1998. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines on the Inclusion of Children as Participants in Research Involving Human Subjects" that was published in the "NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts", March 6, 1998, and is available at the following URL address: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-024.html Investigators also may obtain copies of the policy from the program staff listed under INQUIRIES. Program staff may also provide additional relevant information concerning the policy. LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by the date listed at the beginning of this PA, a letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed research, the name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address of the Principal Investigator, the identities of other key personnel and participating institutions, and the number and title of the PA in response to which the application may be submitted. Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows NCI and NCRR staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review. The letter of intent is to be sent to Dr. Barbara Croft at the address listed under INQUIRIES. APPLICATION PROCEDURES SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING THE COMBINED R21/R33 PHASED INNOVATION AWARD APPLICATION: Applications for R21/R33 grants are to be submitted on the grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 4/98) and prepared according to the instructions provided unless specified otherwise within this section. Application kits are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research and may be obtained from the Division of Extramural Outreach and Information Resources, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7910, Bethesda, MD 20892-7910, telephone 301/435- 0714, email: grantsinfo@nih.gov. See also the website for PHS 398: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html The R21/R33 application must include the specific aims for each phase and the Milestones that would justify transition to the R33 phase. See below, Item d., "Research Design and Methods" for directions for including Milestones in the application. For applications that are funded through this solicitation, completion of the R21 Milestones will elicit an NCI expedited review that will determine whether or not the R33 should be awarded. The release of R33 funds will be based on successful completion of negotiated scientific Milestones, program priorities, and on the availability of funds. The expedited review may result in additional negotiations of award. The R21/R33 Phased Innovation Award application must be submitted as a single application, with one face page. Although it is submitted as a single application, it should be clearly organized into two phases. To accomplish a clear distinction between the two phases, applicants are directed to complete Sections a-d of the Research Plan twice: one write-up of sections a-d and Milestones for the R21 phase and sections a-d again for the R33 phase. The Form 398 Table of Contents should be modified to show sections a-d for each phase as well as the Milestones. There is a page limit of 25 pages for the composite a-d text (i.e., sections a-d and Milestones for the R21 and sections a-d for the R33 phase all must be contained within the 25-page limit.) In preparing the R21/R33 application, investigators should consider the fact that applications will be assigned a single priority score. In addition, as discussed in the REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS section, the initial review panel has the option of recommending only the R21 phase for support. However, a Phased Innovation Award Application with an R33 Phase that is so deficient in merit that it is not recommended for support will reflect upon the judgment of the applicant. For these reasons, the clarity and completeness of the R21/R33 application with regard to specific goals and feasibility Milestones for each phase are critical. The presentation of Milestones that are not sufficiently scientifically rigorous to be valid for assessing progress in the R21 phase will reflect upon the scientific judgment of the applicant. 1. Face Page of the application: Item 2. Check the box marked "YES" and type the number and title of this PA. Also indicate if the application is a R21/33 or R33. Item 7a, DIRECT COSTS REQUESTED FOR INITIAL PERIOD OF SUPPORT: This PA does NOT use the "Modular Grant" and "Just-in-time" concepts. For the R21 phase of the combined R21/R33 application, direct costs are limited to a maximum of $100,000 per year for a maximum of two years and the award may not be used to supplement an ongoing project. The requested budgets can exceed this cap to accommodate for Facilities and Administrative costs to subcontracts to the project. Insert the first year of R21 support in item 7a. Modular Grant Application instructions in PHS 398 do NOT apply to this PA. Item 8a, DIRECT COSTS REQUESTED FOR PROPOSED PERIOD OF SUPPORT: For the R21 phase, direct costs requested for the proposed period may not exceed $100,000 per year for two years of support. The statement in item 7a above pertaining to subcontract costs also applies here. Insert sum of all years of requested support in item 8a. 2. Page 2 - Description: As part of the description, identify concisely the technology or methodology to be developed, its innovative nature, its relationship to presently available capabilities, and its expected impact on imaging technology. 3. Budget: The application should provide a detailed budget for Initial Budget Period (form page 4), for each of the initial years of the R21 and R33 phases as well as a budget for the entire proposed period of support (form page 5). Form pages should indicate which years are R21 and R33. All budgets should include a written justification. An annual meeting of all investigators funded through this program will be held to share progress and research insights that may further progress in the program. Applicants should request travel funds in their budgets for the principal investigator and one additional senior investigator to attend this annual meeting. 4. Research Plan: Item a., Specific Aims. The applicants must present specific aims that the applicant considers scientifically appropriate for the relevant phases of the project. The instructions in the PHS 398 booklet for this section of research grant applications suggest that the applicant state the hypotheses to be tested. Since the goal of this PA is the development of innovative imaging technologies, hypothesis testing per se may not be the driving force in developing such a proposal and, therefore, may not be applicable. For the R21 portion of the grant application, preliminary data are not required, although they should be included when available. For both the R21 and R33 phase, research that develops new technologies is likely to require the application of principles from fields such as engineering, biomedical engineering, materials science, physics, mathematics, and computer science. Clear statements of these underlying principles within this section are essential. Item b., Background and Significance Elaborate on the innovative nature of the proposed research. Clarify how the technology development proposed in this project is a significant improvement over existing approaches, based on a literature review of this topic. Explain the potential of the proposed technology and technology integration for having a broad impact on research, diagnosis or treatment of cancer and/or other diseases. Clearly identify how the project, if successful, would result in new capabilities for diagnosis and treatment, the immediacy of the opportunity, and how these proposed technologies would differ from existing technologies. Item c., Preliminary Studies/Progress Report While preliminary data are not required for submission of the R21 phase, this section should provide current thinking or evidence in the field to substantiate feasibility of the R21 phase. The R33 need not repeat information already provided in the R21. In the event that an applicant feels that technology is too proprietary to disclose, applicants at a minimum should provide a demonstration (results) of the capabilities of the proposed technology. Item d., Research Design and Methods Follow the instructions in the PHS 398 booklet. In addition, for the R21 phase only, the following information must be included as a final section of Item d: Applications must include a specific section labeled Milestones following the Research Design and Methods of the R21 phase. The Milestones are a measure of whether the specific aims have been accomplished and whether proof of principle has been established for the R21 phase. Milestones should be well described, quantifiable, and scientifically justified and not be simply a restatement of the specific aims. A discussion of the Milestones relative to the success of the R21 phase, as well as the implications of successful completion of the Milestones for the R33 phase and the page number of the Milestones section should be listed. This separate section should be indicated in the Table of Contents. Applications lacking Milestone information as determined by the NCI program staff, will be returned to the applicant without review. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF THE R33 APPLICATION WHEN SUBMITTED WITHOUT THE R21 PHASE. Applications for R33 grants are to be submitted on the grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 4/98) and prepared according to the instructions provided unless specified otherwise within items 1-5 below. Application kits are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research and may be obtained from the Division of Extramural Outreach and Information Resources, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7910, Bethesda, MD 20892-7910, telephone 301/435- 0714, email: grantsinfo@nih.gov. See also the website for PHS 398: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html 1. Face Page of the application: Item 2. Check the box marked "YES" and type the number and title of this PA and indicate R33. 2. Page 2 Description: As part of the description, identify concisely the technology or methodology to be developed, its innovative nature, its relationship to presently available capabilities and its expected impact on the diagnosis or treatment of cancer and/or other diseases. 3. Research Plan: Item a., Specific Aims. The instructions in the PHS 398 booklet for this section of research grant applications suggest that the applicant state the hypotheses to be tested. Because the goal of this PA is to develop innovative technologies, hypothesis testing per se may not be the driving force in developing such a proposal and, therefore, may not be applicable. Item b., Background and Significance Elaborate on the innovative nature of the proposed research. Clarify how the technology development or any related technology integration for effective solutions proposed in this project is a significant improvement over existing approaches. Explain the potential of the proposed technology for having a broad impact on research, diagnosis or treatment of cancer and other diseases. Clearly identify how the project, if successful, would result in new capabilities for diagnosis and treatment, the immediacy of the opportunity, and how these proposed technologies would differ from existing technologies. Item c., Preliminary Studies/Progress report This section must document that feasibility (proof of principle) studies have been completed, and progress achieved, equivalent to that expected through the support of an R21 project. The application must clearly describe how the exploratory/developmental study is ready to scale up to an expanded development stage. In the event that an applicant feels that the technology is too proprietary to disclose, applicants at a minimum should provide a demonstration (results). Ideally, performance capabilities of the proposed technology, or quantitative performance characteristics, should be provided that may be objectively evaluated and compared to the published literature. Item d., Research Design and Methods Follow the instructions in the PHS 398 booklet. FOR ALL APPLICATIONS Appendix: All instructions in the Form 398 application kit apply. All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations. Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide information necessary to the review because reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites. Reviewers are cautioned that their anonymity may be compromised when they directly access an Internet site. (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-004.html). Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the Checklist, and three signed photocopies, in one package to: Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health 6701 Rockledge Drive Room 1040 - MSC 7710 Bethesda, MD 20892-7710 (20817 for express service) At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application must be sent to: Ms. Toby Friedberg Referral Officer National Cancer Institute 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8062, MSC 8239 Bethesda, MD 20892-8239 Rockville, MD 20852 (for overnight/courier service) Telephone: (301) 496-3428 FAX: (301) 402-0275 Applications must be received by dates given above. If an application is received after that date, it will be returned to the applicant without review. The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will not accept any application in response to this PA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. The CSR will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed by the CSR for completeness and by NCI program staff for adherence to the guidelines of this PA. Applications not adhering to application instructions described above and those applications that are incomplete as determined by CSR or by NCI program staff will be returned to the applicant without review. Applications that are complete and adhere to the guidelines of this PA will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened by the NCI in accordance with the review criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, all applicants will receive a written critique and may undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of the applications, will be discussed, assigned a priority score, and receive a second level review by the appropriate national advisory board/council. Review Criteria: The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. The reviewers will comment on the following aspects of the application in their written critiques in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed and considered by the reviewers in assigning the overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. Note that the application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. 1. Significance. Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field? To what degree does the technology support the needs for the targeted disease? 2. Approach. Are the conceptual framework, design, and methods adequately developed, well integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? What is the time frame for developing the proposed technologies and suitability of this time frame for meeting the community"s needs? How easy will it be to use the proposed technology? Are the plans for the proposed technology, its integration as an effective solution for implementation and dissemination adequate? If industry partnerships are proposed, how will they facilitate the development and integration of system components? 3. Milestones (for R21/R33 applications) and Proof of Principle (for R33 applications). For the R21/R33 applications, how appropriate are the proposed Milestones against which to evaluate the demonstration of feasibility for transition to the R33 development phase? For the R33 applications, how well has feasibility or proof of principle been demonstrated? 4. Innovation. Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? What is the throughput and cost effectiveness of the proposed technology? What additional uses can be projected for the proposed technology? 5. Investigator. Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)? 6. Environment. Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support? Additional Considerations For the R21/R33 Phased Innovation Award Application, the initial review group will evaluate the specific goals for each phase and the feasibility Milestones that would justify expansion to the R33 phase. A single priority score will be assigned to each scored application. As with any grant application, the initial review group has the option of recommending support for a shorter duration than that requested by the applicant, and basing the final merit rating on the recommended portion of the application. For the R21/R33 application, this may result in a recommendation that only the R21 phase be supported, based on concerns related to the applicant specific goals and the feasibility Milestones justifying expansion to the R33 phase. Deletion of the R33 phase by the review panel or inadequate Milestones will affect the merit rating of the application. The initial review group will also examine: the appropriateness of the proposed project budget and duration, the adequacy of plans to include minorities and their subgroups, both genders, and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research as well as plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects, the provisions for the protection of human and animal subjects, and the safety of the research environment. AWARD CRITERIA Applications recommended by the appropriate national advisory board/council will be considered for award based upon (a) quality of the proposed project as determined by peer review, (b) availability of funds, and (c) program priority. INQUIRIES Inquiries are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to: Barbara Y. Croft, Ph.D. Biomedical Imaging Program National Cancer Institute 6130 Executive Plaza, Suite 800 Bethesda, MD 20892-2590 Rockville, MD 20852 (for express/courier service) Telephone: (301) 496-9531 FAX: (301) 480-5785 Email: bc129b@nih.gov Abraham Levy, Ph.D. Biomedical Technology National Center for Research Resources 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 6150 Bethesda, MD 20892-7965 Telephone: (301) 435-0755 FAX: (301) 480-3659 Email: al26y@nih.gov Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Ms. Kathleen Shino Grants Administration Branch National Cancer Institute Executive Plaza South, Suite 243 6120 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-7150 Telephone: (301) 496-8635 FAX: (301) 496-8601 Email: shinok@gab.nci.nih.gov Ms. Judith Musgrave OGM/NCRR One Rockledge Center 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965 Bethesda, MD 20892-7965 Phone: (301) 435-0841 FAX: (301) 480-3777 Email address: judithm@ep.ncrr.nih.gov Direct inquiries regarding review matters to: Ms. Toby Friedberg Referral Officer National Cancer Institute 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8062, MSC 8239 Bethesda, MD 20892-8239 Rockville, MD 20852 (for overnight/courier service) Telephone: (301) 496-3428 FAX: (301) 402-0275 Email: tf12W@nih.gov AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research (NCI) and No.93.371, Biomedical Technology (NCRR). Awards are made under authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and administered under NIH grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
| ||||||
![]() |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
![]() |
||||
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health® |