RESISTANCE TO ANTIVIRALS TARGETED TO HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 44, December 11, 1992 PA NUMBER: PA-93-31 P.T. 34 Keywords: AIDS Antivirals Drug Resistance+ Screening of Drugs/Agents National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Application Receipt Dates: January 2, May 1, September 1, 1993 PURPOSE This Program Announcement (PA) is designed to stimulate research to: (1) elucidate mechanisms of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) drug resistance, (2) determine the effects of viral drug resistance in lentivirus pathogenesis, (3) identify improved methods to screen for drug resistant HIV and animal lentivirus variants, and (4) design and evaluate novel therapies for treating or preventing drug resistance, utilizing in vitro and animal model systems as applicable. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This PA, Resistance to Antivirals Targeted to HIV, is related to the priority area of HIV infection. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000: (Summary Report: Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238). ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Applications may be submitted by domestic, foreign, for-profit and non-profit organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government. Foreign institutions are not eligible for First Independent Research Support and Transition (FIRST) (R29) awards. Applications from minority individuals and women are encouraged. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT This PA solicits R01 and R29 applications. While no funds have been set aside specifically for supporting applications submitted in response to this PA, the NIAID regards additional quality research in this area to be of high programmatic priority. The total project period for awards made in response to this PA will not exceed four years for domestic institutions and three years for foreign institutions. If an R29 application is submitted, three reference letters are required to be submitted with the application and stapled to the face page of the original application. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background The Developmental Therapeutics Branch (DTB), Basic Research and Development Program (BRDP), Division of AIDS (DAIDS), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) supports basic and applied research grants leading to the discovery of new therapies for the treatment of HIV infection and the opportunistic infections (OIs) associated with AIDS. This goal is accomplished through: (1) management of investigator-initiated research for HIV; (2) fostering of innovative, multidisciplinary efforts leading to the discovery and design of new anti-HIV and anti-OI therapies through the National Cooperative Drug Discovery Group programs for treatment of HIV infection (NCDDG-HIV) and for treatment of the OIs associated with AIDS (NCDDG-OI); and (3) preclinical drug development contract resources to confirm activity of anti-HIV and anti-OI compounds, and to evaluate combination and immune-based therapies in vitro and in animal models. The DTB released a Request for Applications (RFA) entitled "Drug Resistance and the Human Immunodeficiency Virus" in 1989. Applications funded in response to that RFA focused predominantly on methodologies for detecting HIV variants with reduced susceptibility to antivirals. During the past few years, our understanding of the emergence of drug-resistant HIV has increased dramatically. For example, diminished in vitro susceptibility of HIV clinical isolates from patients undergoing treatment with AZT for as few as six to twelve months is well documented. Associated with this phenotype of reduced susceptibility to AZT is a characteristic pattern of genetic alterations at codons 41, 67, 70, 215, and 219 of reverse transcriptase (RT) that appear to emerge in a temporal fashion conferring progressively increasing resistance. The complex interplay among these mutations as evidenced by (1) the disappearance of the codon 70 mutation in sequential clinical isolates that show increased resistance and (2) the stability of the mutation at codon 215 in isolates from patients switched to ddI therapy that have reverted to AZT susceptibility is not well understood. The precise mechanism by which these mutations confer the resistant phenotype in cell culture remains unknown. More recently, a decrease in in vitro sensitivity to ddI of HIV isolates obtained from patients who changed to ddI therapy after prolonged treatment with AZT has been reported. An initial report describing resistance to ddC in one patient has also appeared. In addition, preliminary results from clinical trials indicate that HIV drug resistance to several non-nucleoside RT (NNRT) inhibitors, as determined in vitro, develops rapidly in patients. Novel mutations in HIV RT that correlate with in vitro resistance to ddI, ddC and the NNRT inhibitors have been identified in clinical isolates. Introduction of these specific mutations into the genetic background of a replication competent, fully susceptible virus confers a resistant phenotype that mimics the susceptibility profile of the original clinical isolates. In summary, characteristic patterns of mutations in HIV-1 RT have been identified at the molecular level in resistant variants and genetic signatures appear to be distinct for each inhibitor or class of inhibitors. These observations notwithstanding, the exact mechanism(s) by which the resistant phenotype is manifested in vivo via these alterations is not known, and the clinical significance of HIV-related drug resistance remains unknown at this time. Research Scope Molecular, enzymatic and biologic effects of drug resistance: Given the precedence of resistance to several nucleoside analogs and to NNRT inhibitors in clinical isolates, it is expected that resistance to inhibitors directed against other viral targets is likely to occur. With the introduction of anti-HIV agents other than RT inhibitors into clinical trials and the preclinical development of others, studies involving therapeutic modalities directed against non-RT targets, e.g., protease, TAT, myristoylation, as well as against RT, are urgently needed. Crucial clinical studies to determine whether or not emergence of drug resistant variants is correlated with disease progression are underway. Of equal importance are studies that decipher the molecular, enzymatic and biological aspects of HIV drug resistance that can serve as the basis for developing therapeutic strategies to overcome or delay the emergence of drug resistant HIV in the clinic. While clinical relevance awaits further corroboration, research focussed on understanding the mechanisms underlying resistance and the biological properties of the resistant virus that are implicated in disease progression is encouraged. As mentioned above, in spite of the identification of characteristic genetic alterations conferring a drug resistant phenotype on HIV, the precise mechanism(s) by which these mutations mediate their enzymatic and biological impact on the resistant phenotype is unknown. The following areas of research are particularly encouraged: o Elucidation of the basis for the apparent inability of cell-free assays to distinguish RT purified from AZT-resistant vs. AZT-sensitive isolates may shed additional light on this dilemma. This is contrasted by retention of the drug resistant phenotype in RT purified from NNRT- resistant HIV. o Structure/function studies of drug resistant viral targets in the presence and absence of drug may also contribute to delineating the mechanisms by which genetic alterations result in loss of drug effect. o The biological effects the genetic alterations conferring the resistant phenotype have on the properties of the virus in terms of its pathogenicity and capacity to accelerate or attenuate disease progression are not well studied. Information is also incomplete regarding the relationship between HIV variants capable of forming syncytium upon cocultivation of infected patient peripheral blood lymphocytes with MT-2 cells, viral drug resistance and clinical progression. o The effect of drug resistance on viral transmission needs to be elucidated. If drug resistant HIV variants are transmitted, is the frequency comparable to that of their drug sensitive counterparts? Phenotypic and genotypic detection of drug resistance: Sensitive and reproducible methods for (1) detection of drug resistant HIV mutants, including primary isolates within phenotypic mixtures and (2) quantitation of levels of drug resistance and proportion of resistant HIV variants are urgently needed to delineate the mechanism(s) and impact of resistance and to predict the efficacy of new therapies. Methods for the expansion of primary HIV isolates to adequate titers with minimal selection for specific viral variant(s) are also critical. Recent evidence suggests that passage of clinical isolates in cell lines may rapidly select for specific genotypes. Specifically o Additional culture systems should be developed that closely model the in vivo situation. Currently, assays utilizing fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) have received the predominant focus. However, variable infectability of donor cells may preclude the standardization of this assay system. Methods for expansion of primary HIV isolates to adequate titers with minimal selection for specific viral variant(s) are also critically needed. o Genotypic assays also suffer from certain limitations, particularly those imposed by the possibility that the genetic signature of resistance associated with a specific therapeutic may not yet be comprehensive. Technical difficulties also exist in designing polymerase chain reaction primers that can accurately, specifically, and reproducibly amplify the associated mutations. Because of these current limitations and deficiencies in evaluating HIV drug resistance, development of novel and/or validation of existing assays to measure viral susceptibility to antivirals is/are strongly encouraged. For example, innovative, highly sensitive biophysical methods recently developed may be modified and implemented to identify alterations previously undetectable at the protein level that correspond to mutations conferring the resistant phenotype. Such changes may represent markers for HIV resistance to drugs or may, themselves, be directly responsible for the drug resistant phenotype. Animal models of drug resistance: Development and implementation of relevant animal models of lentivirus infection are critically needed to address these resistance issues. Efforts to establish an animal model of viral drug resistance may include development of protocols for detection and quantitation as well as expansion of isolates, as the problems addressed above for HIV-specific susceptibility assays are likely to be similar. Animal models of lentiviral infection (e.g., SIV and FIV) of potential relevance are available. Thus, systematic evaluation of virus isolates from drug-treated animals may define an animal model that parallels documented resistance in HIV-infected patients. Once developed, such model(s) may be exploited for assessing drug therapy and drug resistance. Novel strategies for circumventing HIV drug resistance: The ultimate goal of these studies is to design novel strategies to circumvent and/or delay the development of viral drug resistance. As an example, one approach can focus on highly conserved functional domains identified in several HIV proteins (RNA-dependent and DNA-dependent activities, and RNaseH and RNaseD activities of RT; transactivation, nuclear-targeting, and RNA/protein binding activities of Tat). The observation that these domains are spared from sequence variations suggests that most mutations in these regions would be lethal to the virus and, therefore, to have no or minimal consequence on drug treatment. This and other research objectives include, but are not limited to: o Exploiting other viral targets believed to be essential for viral survival, and thus incompatible with resistance-conferring mutations o Investigating combination therapies designed to inhibit more than one distinct step in the HIV infectious cycle that may delay the development of viral drug resistance by virtue of a multipronged action o Designing studies to reduce the overall rate at which HIV mutates. While not specifically addressed in this PA, evaluation of the role of host-mediated processes in the resistant phenotype may also provide insight into developing new therapeutic approaches. The rationale for any potential approach should first be tested and analyzed in an appropriate in vitro system, if applicable. For example, a new therapeutic regimen may be evaluated for its effect on in vitro emergence of resistant HIV variants. Alternatively, a novel therapeutic strategy may be tested for its activity against established resistant mutants. Subsequent evaluation of new drug strategies in relevant animal models should yield important information on the applicability of the proposed strategies to the clinical setting. The approaches outlined above are examples of potential research directions bearing on the emergence of HIV drug resistance and are not intended to be comprehensive. STUDY POPULATIONS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES NIH policy is that applicants for NIH clinical research grants and cooperative agreements will be required to include minorities and women in study populations so that research findings can be of benefit to all persons at risk of the disease, disorder or condition under study; special emphasis should be placed on the need for inclusion of minorities and women in studies of diseases, disorders and conditions which disproportionately affect them. This policy is intended to apply to males and females of all ages. If women or minorities are excluded or inadequately represented in clinical research, particularly in proposed population-based studies, a clear compelling rationale should be provided. The composition of the proposed study population must be described in terms of gender and racial/ethnic group, together with a rationale for its choice. In addition, gender and racial/ethnic issues should be addressed in developing a research design and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the study. This information should be included in the form PHS 398 in Items 1-4 of the Research Plan AND summarized in Item 5, Human Subjects. Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of including the broadest possible representation of minority groups. However, NIH recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in all research projects to include representation of the full array of United States racial/ethnic minority populations (i.e., Native Americans (including American Indians or Alaskan Natives), Asian/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics). The rationale for studies on single minority population groups must be provided. For the purpose of this policy, clinical research is defined as human biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention (and preventive strategies), diagnosis, or treatment of diseases, disorders or conditions, including but not limited to clinical trials. The usual NIH policies concerning research involving human subjects also apply. Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues cannot be identified or linked to individuals are excluded. However, every effort should be made to include tissues from women and racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to apply the results of the study broadly, and this should be addressed by applicants. For foreign awards, the policy on inclusion of women applies fully; since the definition of minority differs in other countries, the applicant must discuss the relevance of research involving foreign population groups to the United States' populations, including minorities. If the required information is not contained within the application, the application will be deferred until the information is provided. Peer review will address specifically whether the research plan in the application conforms to these policies. If the representation of women or minorities in the study design is inadequate to answer the scientific question(s) addressed AND the justification for the selected study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific weakness or deficiency in the study design and will be reflected in assigning the priority score to the application. All applications for clinical research submitted to NIH are required to address these policies. NIH funding components will not award grants or cooperative agreements that do not comply with these policies. APPLICATION PROCEDURES Applications are to be submitted on grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91). Receipt dates are January 2, May 1, and September 1. Application kits are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research and may be obtained from the Office of Grants Inquiries, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, Westwood Building, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone 301/496-7441. The title and number of the announcement must be typed in Section 2a on the face page of application and the "YES" box marked. The completed original application and five legible copies must be sent or delivered to Division of Research Grants National Institutes of Health Westwood Building, Room 240 Bethesda, MD 20892** REVIEW PROCEDURES Applications in response to this announcement are expected to be assigned to the NIAID. However, whenever there is inter-institute programmatic overlap in the proposed research, the PHS Referral Guidelines will prevail in the assignment of applications to the different institutes. Applications will be reviewed for scientific and technical merit by study sections of the Division of Research Grants, NIH, in accordance with the standard NIH peer review procedures. Applications focusing on AIDS will be assigned to study sections constituted to review AIDS-related grant applications. Following scientific-technical review, the applications will receive a second-level review by an appropriate national advisory council. For AIDS-related applications, the earliest award date for successful applications will be no more than six months from the receipt date. AWARD CRITERIA Applications will compete for available funds with all other approved applications. The following criteria will be considered in making funding decisions: o Quality of the proposed project as determined by peer review o Availability of funds o Program balance among research areas of the announcement. Applications from institutions that have a General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources may identify the GCRC as a resource for conducting the proposed research by including a letter of agreement from either the GCRC program director or the principal investigator. INQUIRIES Written and telephone inquiries are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Direct inquiries of a scientific nature to: Roberta Black, Ph.D. Basic Research and Development Program, Division of AIDS National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 2C12 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-8197 FAX: (301) 480-5703/402-3211 Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Ms. Jane Unsworth Chief, AIDS Grants Management Section National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 4B22 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-7075 FAX: (301) 480-3780 AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, 93.856 - Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research and 93.855 - Immunology, Allergy and Transplantation Research. Awards are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Title IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42 USC 241 and 285) and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. .
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
![]() |
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
![]() |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
![]() |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
![]() |
||||
Note: For help accessing PDF, RTF, MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Audio or Video files, see Help Downloading Files. |