HOME HEALTH CARE AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FOR OLDER ADULTS
NIH GUIDE, Volume 21, Number 18, May 15, 1992
PA NUMBER: PA-92-79
P.T. 34
Keywords:
HEALTH CARE
Health Services Delivery
Aging/Gerontology
Nursing
Community/Outreach Programs
Biomedical Research, Multidiscipl
National Institute on Aging
National Center For Nursing Research
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
PURPOSE
The National Institute on Aging (NIA), the National Center for Nursing
Research (NCNR), and the Center for General Health Services Extramural
Research, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), invite
qualified researchers to submit applications to investigate the nature,
use, and outcomes of different types of in-home health and supportive
services. In-home health care and supportive services (hereafter
called home care) are defined broadly to include post-acute and
long-term health care and social services provided at home. This
definition excludes nursing homes but includes individual residences
and the wide range of community-based residential settings (e.g.,
assisted living facilities) where supportive services and specialized
environments enable a dependent individual to remain in the community
for as long as possible. Research is encouraged on home care in
general or on particular types of care (e.g., high technology home
care; skilled home health care; low technology/custodial care).
This program announcement supplements but does not replace earlier NIA
program announcements on related topics such as: Aging and Formal
Health Care (NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, Vol. 16, No. 19, June
1987) and Economics of Aging, Health, and Retirement (NIH Guide for
Grants and Contracts, Vol. 20, No. 15, April 1991). It also
complements an earlier Program Note, "Research Agenda on Home Health
Care" by the AHCPR (September 1988). Also relevant is the forthcoming
report by the NCNR on Long-Term Care of Older Persons.
The NIA was established to conduct and support research and training on
the biomedical, social, and behavioral aspects of the aging process, as
well as diseases and other special issues and needs of older people.
In line with the Congressional mandate for both medical and non-medical
research, long-term care needs of older people and their families is a
major priority. The NIA is specifically interested in social and
behavioral research on the interaction between older people and their
caregivers with the health care system, the linkages between formal and
informal care, and the structure, processes, and outcomes of new models
of care. Of particular interest is research on home care and supportive
services including high technology care, skilled home health care, low
technology/custodial care, respite care, and board and care.
The NCNR supports basic and clinical research and research training in
patient care relevant to nursing including studies involving home
health care and other community-based settings. The major NCNR
emphases in building the science related to long-term care in the home
have been on the processes and outcomes of care including the testing
of intervention strategies to encourage independence, facilitate
management of commonly experienced symptoms or health problems, prevent
the onset of disabilities in those who are chronically ill, improve
functional status and quality of life, maintain caregiver and other
family support mechanisms, and facilitate transitions between health
care settings and home.
The AHCPR was created to enhance the quality, appropriateness, and
effectiveness of health care services and access to such services. The
Center for General Health Services Extramural Research (CGHSER)
supports multidisciplinary extramural research, demonstrations, and
evaluation activities on a broad range of health service research and
health care technology issues. Studies focus on improvements in
clinical practice, delivery, cost, quality, and access to care.
Research on the elderly at CGHSER deals with issues of the
organization, delivery, quality, cost, and financing of health services
and the role of primary care in long-term care.
Approximately seven million older Americans require assistance with
basic tasks of daily living, a number that is expected to increase
dramatically as the baby boom generation ages. Though nursing home
care is often equated with long-term care, it is but one part of the
long-term care continuum. For every person who is institutionalized,
an estimated four or more persons in the community require some form of
long-term care. The burgeoning long-term care needs of an aging
society and less restrictive eligibility requirements for Federal
reimbursement have fueled the expansion of the home-care industry.
Care for dependent, older Americans living in the community is a
priority area needing the attention of researchers, planners,
practitioners, and policy analysts. The Bi-partisan Commission on
Comprehensive Health Care (The Pepper Commission) called for
substantial increases in long-term care research. The Commission
emphasized the need for intensified research on home and
community-based care to guide programmatic and policy decisions and to
strengthen the current health care system.
Due to an interest in cost-containment of health care services, home
care has been proclaimed to be a "cost- effective" alternative to
institutionalized care. Yet, existing research on home care simply
does not provide an adequate basis for policy and program development.
Previous studies of cost-effectiveness of in-home and community-based
care have been limited by inconsistencies in definitions of services
and inadequate data sources. The resulting contradictory
cost-effectiveness studies point to the need for further study on this
issue and the need for studies focusing on broader quality of life
outcomes.
In collaboration with the Administration on Aging, the NIA sponsored a
conference in 1990 focussing on in-home care to identify a research
agenda in this area. A detailed summary of identified research
concerns is available by writing the National Institute on Aging (see
INQUIRIES). In an edited volume on In-Home Care for Older People (Ory
and Duncker, 1992), the authors identified three areas highlighted at
the conference that need immediate attention: (1) the use of in-home
services for older people with different functional needs; (2) the
effectiveness of different types or packages of services for different
populations, and (3) the coordination (or lack of coordination) of
in-home services with physician-provided care. In addition, the
significant contributions made by family and friends, the burdens
experienced by families providing care, and the need for better
integration and coordination of services and care providers across the
total continuum of health and social care were issues requiring further
investigation.
The lack of a clear conceptualization of home and community-based,
long-term care has been a major research obstacle. There is a need for
further development of theoretical concepts, including definitions of
home care and the boundaries between home care and institutional care.
To increase current understanding of home care, it is necessary for
investigators to begin to specify variations in the nature and types of
care currently used by older adults; to examine clinical strategies and
other processes of care on different populations; and to determine the
effects of different settings of home and community-based care. More
attention is needed on the quality of life and functional outcomes that
are of crucial concern to older people and their families. Cost
questions also need to be considered in research on in- home health
care and other community-based residential care alternatives.
Research is encouraged that specifies the broad conceptual boundaries
of home care and gives the field a strong base of data and
methodologies. Advances will come through an awareness of the need to
draw upon interdisciplinary expertise in nursing, medicine and other
clinical sciences, behavioral sciences, and health service aspects of
health and aging. For example, current models of health care
utilization can be expanded to pay more attention to the complex
interactions of clinical and social influences. Similarly, researchers
are urged to design innovative sampling strategies for minimizing
typical methodological problems such as population selection bias.
Researchers should also be sensitive to all participants in the care
process, including clients, their families, and/or other informal care
providers, as well as the potential for variability across cultural,
ethnic, or gender lines.
HEALTHY PEOPLE
The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health
promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000,"
a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This RFA, Home
Health Care and Supportive Services for Older Adults, is related to the
priority area of educational and community based programs. Potential
applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report:
Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report:
Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents,
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone
202-783-3238).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT
Applications for research grants may be made by domestic and foreign,
public and private, for-profit and non-profit organizations, such as
universities, colleges, hospitals, and laboratories. Women and
minority investigators, in particular, are encouraged to apply.
Foreign applicants are not eligible for the First Independent Research
Support and Transition (FIRST) (R29) awards.
MECHANISMS OF SUPPORT
The primary mechanisms for support of research under this program
announcement are the research project grant (R01), and FIRST Award
(R29). Applicants are advised to contact the program staff of the NIA,
the NCNR, or the AHCPR for further information on levels and duration
of support. The AHCPR does not support the FIRST Award.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
This announcement seeks grant applications for studies on in-home
health care and supportive services to increase understanding of this
growing segment of the health care industry. It is anticipated that
research funded under this initiative will contribute to the scientific
base for informed policy recommendations and changes. Utilization and
availability of in-home health care and supportive services, process
and outcome of care, and populations requiring specialized care are a
few of the issues that require more attention. Examples of relevant
research topics include, but are not limited to:
o Nature Or Type Of Home Care
A broad range of studies, (i.e., clinical, epidemiological,
sociological, anthropological) are needed to examine the range of
existing in-home health and supportive services. Specific examples
include: the impact of new health care policies on the nature and type
of community care options available (e.g., eligibility criteria for
coverage); impact of high-tech clinical care in the home and its impact
on the individual, caregivers, and/or the health care industry; the
specific content of home care services (e.g., the duration, place and
frequency of respite services and how these relate to caregiver use).
o Use Of And Need For Home Care
Utilization of in-home health care and supportive services by older
people and their families, the extent to which needs remain unmet, and
the complex interactions between service need, service expectations,
and service receipt are important areas for study. Others may include:
epidemiological studies of the use of in-home health care and
supportive services and changes in use over the course of an illness;
development of criteria to measure "need for care" and examination of
relationships between need and preferences; development of forecasting
models to predict need for and use of in-home health care.
o Process Of Home Care
How care is provided in the home and what structures are available to
assist the older person, family, and/or other care providers are issues
of continued importance. Research that examines different models of
home care and/or links specific outcomes to particular interventions is
needed. Still more information is needed on the process of care from
the perspective of the client, the caregiver, or both. Areas that need
further investigation are: alternative approaches to care (e.g., board
and care) and structures for organizing care (e.g., shared-aide
services); efforts to link care providers (e.g., board and care
providers) with the larger community-based system; clinical
intervention strategies designed to effectively impact health-related
quality of life, functional status, and/or family relationships;
transitions, such as initiation of informal or formal care services or
transfer to and from nursing homes, and how they relate to the stage of
caregiving and changing need for services.
o Outcomes Of Home Care
An especially crucial aspect of in-home health care and supportive
service research is defining and measuring quality. Therefore,
research should focus on definitional and measurement issues related to
quality as well as effectiveness for specific interventions being
examined. Research may include: the effect of alternative approaches
to in-home health care (e.g., personal assistance, respite care, high
technology care or environmental modifications) on clients, family
members, and other care providers as well as the development of more
sensitive measures of stress, burden, satisfaction, and other outcomes;
relevant outcomes of care, especially those that lead to determination
of effective forms of relief that could be offered to caregivers;
strategies for increasing quality of life, health and/or socially
related; and strategies to improve the functional status of clients;
the cost and effectiveness of services, how services fit into the
caregiver's living arrangements, and how services fit into the dynamics
of kinship, friendship, and neighborhood networks.
o Special Care Populations
Many subpopulations are served by in-home health care and supportive
services. To target services more effectively, the identification of
care needs for specific subpopulations is necessary. Areas requiring
additional study are: access to and utilization of care in special
populations (e.g., the oldest old, women, minority and ethnic
populations, rural elderly), and; the needs and resources of adults of
all ages. Comparative research is encouraged on models of care for
younger disabled ("independent living") populations and their relevance
to care for older persons.
o Data Resources
Maximum use should be made of existing data. Primary data collection,
however, may be necessary and certain types of databases have been
highlighted as especially relevant. Both large-scale studies and
smaller state, regional or local ones, as well as studies of board and
care homes serving particular subgroups are appropriate. Moreover, it
is important that studies capture the diversity of various forms of
home care (e.g., large v. small, ownership, urban/suburban/rural) and
the residents they serve (e.g., primarily private-pay v. SSI
recipients, racial and ethnic subgroups). Studies may investigate:
(a) the characteristics of the environment, (b) extent and
characteristics of unmet care needs among residents, (c) relationships
between different forms of in-home health care and the larger system,
or (d) resident, owner/operator and staff "transitions". Attention
should be given to specific forms of the home care industry that remain
understudied, such as non- certified home health agencies, small,
unlicensed board and care homes, and unlicensed social service
providers.
STUDY POPULATIONS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF NIH
POLICIES CONCERNING INCLUSION OF WOMEN IN CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY
POPULATIONS
NIH and ADAMHA policy is that applicants for NIH/ADAMHA clinical
research grants and cooperative agreements will be required to include
minorities and women in study populations so that research findings can
be of benefit to all persons at risk of the disease, disorder or
condition under study; special emphasis should be placed on the need
for inclusion of minorities and women in studies of diseases, disorders
and conditions which disproportionately affect them. This policy is
intended to apply to males and females of all ages. If minorities and
women are excluded or inadequately represented in clinical research,
particularly in proposed population- based studies, a clear compelling
rationale should be provided.
The composition of the proposed study population must be described in
terms of gender and race/ethnic group. In addition, gender and
racial/ethnic issues should be addressed in developing a research
design and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the
study. This information should be included in the form PHS 398 in
Sections 1-4 of the Research Plan AND summarized in Section 5, Human
Subjects. Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of
including the broadest possible representation of minority groups.
However, NIH recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in
all research projects to include representation of the full array of
United States racial/ethnic minority populations (i.e., Native
Americans (including American Indians or Alaskan Natives),
Asian/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics). The rationale for studies
on single minority populations groups should be provided.
For the purpose of this policy, clinical research includes human
biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention
(and preventive strategies), diagnosis, or treatment of diseases,
disorders or conditions, including but not limited to clinical trials.
The usual NIH policies concerning research on human subjects also
apply. Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues
cannot be identified or linked to individuals are excluded. However,
every effort should be made to include human tissues from women and
racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to apply the results of
the study broadly, and this should be addressed by applicants.
For foreign awards, the policy on inclusion of women applies fully;
since the definition of minority differs in other countries, the
applicant must discuss the relevance of research involving foreign
population groups to the United States' populations, including
minorities.
If the required information is not contained within the application,
the review will be deferred until the information is provided.
Peer reviewers will address specifically whether the research plan in
the application conforms to these policies. If the representation of
minorities or women in a study design is inadequate to answer the
scientific question(s) addressed AND the justification for the selected
study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific
weakness or deficiency in the study design and will be reflected in
assigning the priority score to the application.
All applications for clinical research submitted to NIH are required to
address these policies. NIH funding components will not award grants
or cooperative agreements that do not comply with these policies.
APPLICATION PROCEDURES
Applicants are to use the research grant application form PHS 398 (rev.
9/91), available at the applicant's institutional Application Control
Office and from the Office of Grants Inquiries, Division of Research
Grants, National Institutes of Health, Westwood Building, Room 240,
Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone (301) 496-7441. Complete item 2a on the
face page of the application indicating that the application is in
response to this announcement and print (next to the checked box)
IN-HOME HEALTH AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES.
The application (with five copies) must be mailed to:
Division of Research Grants
National Institutes of Health
Westwood Building, Room 240
Bethesda, MD 20892**
REVIEW PROCEDURES
Applications will be reviewed for scientific and technical merit by
study sections of the Division of Research Grants, NIH, or by the
AHCPR. Following scientific-technical review, the applications will
receive a second-level review by the appropriate national advisory
council.
AWARD CRITERIA
Applicants will compete for available funds with all other approved
applications assigned to the Institute/ Center/Division. The following
will be considered in making funding decisions:
o Quality of the proposed project as determined by peer review
o Availability of funds
o Program balance among research areas of the announcement
INQUIRIES
Written and telephone inquiries are encouraged. The opportunity to
clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome.
Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:
Dr. Marcia G. Ory
Behavioral and Social Research Program
National Institute on Aging
Gateway Building, Room 2C234
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: (301) 496-3136
Dr. Patricia Moritz
Nursing Systems Branch
National Center for Nursing Research
Westwood Building, Room 754
5333 Westbard Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: (301) 496-0523
Ms. Anne Bavier or Ms. Linda Siegenthaler
Center for General Health Services Extramural Research
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
Executive Office Center, Suite 502
2101 East Jefferson Street
Rockville, MD 20852-4908
Telephone: (301) 227-8357
Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:
Ms. Linda Whipp
Grants and Contracts Management Office
National Institute on Aging
Gateway Building, Room 2N212
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: (301) 496-1472
Sally A. Nichols
Grants Management Officer
National Center for Nursing Research
Westwood Building, Room 748
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: (301) 496-0237
Ralph Sloat
Grants Management Officer
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
2101 East Jefferson Street, Suite 601
Rockville, MD 20852-4908
Telephone: (301) 227-8447
AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS
This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
No. 93.866, No. 93.336 (Nursing Research), No. 93.180, and 93.226.
Awards are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act,
Title IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158,
42 USC 241 and 285) and Title IX, as amended (Public Law 101-239), and
administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR
52 and 45 CFR Part 74 and 42 CFR 67, Subpart A. This program is not
subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order
12372 or Health Systems Agency review.
.
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
|
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
|
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
|
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
|
||||