EXPIRED
DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENDOCRINE PANCREAS RELEASE DATE: August 30, 2002 PA NUMBER: PA-02-161 (Reissued as PA-06-271 for R01s and PA-06-272 for R21s) EXPIRATION DATE: After October 1, 2005, unless reissued. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases(NIDDK) (http://www.niddk.nih.gov) THIS PA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION o Purpose of the PA o Research Objectives o Mechanism(s) of Support o Eligible Institutions o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators o Where to Send Inquiries o Letter of Intent o Submitting an Application o Peer Review Process o Review Criteria o Award Criteria o Required Federal Citations PURPOSE This program announcement is intended to stimulate the application of advances in developmental biology, specifically in developmental genetics, embryology, and stem cell biology, to study pancreatic development. Collaborative efforts that link expertise in basic developmental biology or stem cell biology and diabetes are strongly encouraged. It is anticipated that this research will ultimately lead to a better understanding of the pathways required for the development and regeneration of the endocrine pancreas, both in vivo and in vitro. The NIH will allow federal funding for research using human embryonic stem cells and an NIH registry for human embryonic stem cell lines has been established (http://escr.nih.gov). This PA will support efforts in the characterization of these human embryonic cell lines, as well as human fetal and adult stem cells as they relate to the specification of endoderm and differentiation of pancreatic islet cell types. This PA is intended to intensify investigator-initiated research, to attract new investigators to the field, and to encourage interdisciplinary approaches to research in this area. This program announcement replaces PAS 00-015. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background Processes fundamental to the development of all organ systems include germ layer specification, cell fate determination, pattern formation, proliferation, and differentiation. Inductive signals, including those of the TGF beta family and FGF family, are produced by the notochord, the tissue adjacent to the endoderm, and are thought to be responsible for specifying endoderm. These signals induce downstream endodermal- specific transcriptional factors such as the Mix-type homeobox proteins, Gata factors, and Sox proteins. During embryogenesis, endoderm-derived organ formation is accomplished through an orchestration of signaling pathways that specify the distinct organ anlagen. Signals such as sonic hedgehog must be excluded from the developing pancreatic anlagen for proper pancreas development, while signals produced by the mesenchyme are necessary for pancreatic differentiation into specified cell types. Development of endocrine organs involves the "budding morphogenesis" of an epithelial layer in order to create a specific organ. Additionally, developmental signals that arise from blood vessels can regulate pancreatic organogenesis. Some factors, such as Hex, do not influence specific cell type decisions but may control competence. Initiation of bud formation requires the transcriptional factor HlxB9 while the pdx1/IDX1 is necessary for pancreas development and outgrowth. Genes of the Notch/Delta pathway regulate the ability of a cell to initiate differentiation in the endocrine pancreas. For example, ngn3, a key component of the Notch pathway is required for the formation of the endocrine pancreas. Cell fate decisions in the endocrine pancreas involve a host of transcriptional regulators, which include Pax4, Nkx2.2, Nkx 6.1, Pax6, Isl1 and NeuroD. For the endocrine pancreas, this ultimately means differentiation into the cell types responsible for production of insulin, glucagon, etc. TGF alpha/betas and hedgehog signaling pathways, in their regulation of the extracellular matrix, may be key activators in islet morphogenesis. Little is known about the mechanisms that regulate the migration of islet precursors, but it is likely that cell adhesion molecules such as integrins and perhaps some of the molecules involved in cell guidance in the nervous system could play a role. In the last decade, studies in non-vertebrate genetic models of C. elegans and Drosophila have provided a wealth of scientific advances in the definition of early developmental pathways. In the next decade, the emerging genetic model, zebrafish, can be exploited for dissecting events in endoderm development and morphogenesis of the pancreas. Non- genetic models such as Xenopus and chick have proven useful in identifying and characterizing novel signals and associated components of signaling pathways as well as transcriptional regulators in endoderm development and organ morphogenesis. Understanding the regulation of cell and tissue-specific gene expression in pancreatic development has lead to the generation of useful transgenic mouse models of diabetes. Some of these and future mouse models will be useful for determining pancreatic cell lineage and for prospectively isolating and characterizing stem/progenitor cells from the pancreas. Public databases such http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/EPConDB/index.shtml focused on the developing endocrine pancreas will serve as a resource in identifying novel genes that play a role in pancreas development and in identifying potential cell-specific surface markers at different stages of pancreatic development. Furthermore, the use of cDNA microarrays enriched in genes expressed in the developing endocrine pancreas will aid in the characterization of pancreatic stem/progenitor cells by establishing gene expression profiles and also aid in the phenotypic characterization of the growing number of mouse models of diabetes. In the future, related resources will be available through the NIDDK- funded Beta Cell Biology Consortium (http://www.betacell.org). Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes result from the loss or dysfunction of insulin-producing cells of the pancreas. Replacement of these cells, through transplantation, could offer lifelong treatment for diabetics. However, a major problem in implementing treatment is the lack of sufficient islet cell tissue for transplantation. Embryonic stem cells and other tissue-specific stem cells could potentially provide a limitless source of islet cells for transplantation therapies. Experimentation on mouse and human embryonic stem cells has shown that, in principle, these cells are capable of giving rise to pancreatic islet-like structures that produce insulin under certain culture conditions. Putative stem/progenitor cells have been isolated from human pancreatic duct and islet tissue, however further characterization of these cell populations is needed. These studies are still in their infancy, and a more fundamental understanding of the how to efficiently generate large numbers of functioning pancreatic islets from embryonic or tissue-specific stem cells remains a challenge. Scope and Objectives o Developmental genetic screens for identifying mutations that affect pancreas development. o Identification of signals, signaling pathway components and transcriptional factors that regulate endoderm specification, dorsal pancreatic bud formation, and pancreatic fate determination. o Role of cell-cell interactions, differential cell adhesion, and cell motility in morphogenesis of the pancreatic islet. o Role of extracellular matrix in islet cell morphogenesis. o Molecular markers for defining all stages of pancreatic development, including cell-specific markers of stem/progenitor cells of the endocrine pancreas. o Studies examining endocrine pancreatic cell lineage, including alpha, beta, and delta cell fate determination and differentiation. o Molecular characterization and comparison of human embryonic stem cell lines and other human tissue-specific stem/progenitor cells to produce endoderm and ultimately differentiated cells of the endocrine pancreas. o Prospective isolation, purification and characterization of pancreatic stem/progenitor cells. o Development of clonogenic assays, both in vitro and in vivo, for characterizing stem/progenitor cells of the pancreas. o Identification of growth conditions required to generate differentiated cells of the endocrine pancreas from mammalian stem/progenitor cells. o Use of model systems for the study of regeneration of the endocrine pancreas. o Studies to understand the molecular basis of transdifferentiation of gut, liver, and exocrine pancreatic stem/progenitor cells to produce pancreatic islets. o Studies examining the plasticity of hematopoietic, mesenchymal, liver, neural and other tissue-specific stem/progenitor cells in the formation of pancreatic islets. MECHANISMS OF SUPPORT This PA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) research project grant (R01) and Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant (R21) award mechanisms. The R21 awards are to demonstrate feasibility and to obtain preliminary data testing innovative ideas that represent a clear departure from ongoing research interests. These grants are intended to: (1) provide initial support for new investigators, (2) allow exploration of possible innovative new directions for established investigators, and (3) stimulate investigators from other areas to limit their expertise to research within the scope of this solicitation. Applicants for the R21 must limit their requests to $100,000 direct costs per year and are limited to two years. These R21 grants are not renewable, continuation of projects developed under this program will be through the regular research grant (R01) program. Responsibility for the planning, direction, and execution of the proposed project will be solely that of the applicant. The total project period for an R01 application submitted in response to this PA may not exceed 5 years. This PA uses just-in-time concepts. It also uses the modular as well as the non-modular budgeting formats (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm). Specifically, if you are submitting an application with direct costs in each year of $250,000 or less, use the modular format. Otherwise follow the instructions for non-modular research grant applications. ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS You may submit (an) application if your institution has any of the following characteristics: o For-profit or non-profit organizations o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, and laboratories o Units of State and local governments o Eligible agencies of the Federal government o Domestic or foreign INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO BECOME PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS Any individual with the skills, knowledge and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research is invited to work with their institution to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH programs. WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES We encourage your inquiries concerning this PA and welcome the opportunity answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into two areas: scientific/research and financial or grants management issues: Direct your questions about scientific/research issues to: Sheryl M. Sato, Ph.D. Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 2 Democracy Plaza, Room 6105 6707 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-5460 Telephone: (301)594-8811 FAX: (301)480-3503 Email: ss68z@nih.gov Direct your questions about financial or grants management matters to: Kathleen Shino Division of Extramural Activities 2 Democracy Plaza, Room 708 6707 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-5456 Telephone: (301) 594-8869 FAX: (301) 594-9523 Email: ks48e@nih.gov SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant application instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). The PHS 398 is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in an interactive format. For further assistance contact Grants Info, Telephone (301) 710-0267, Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov APPLICATION RECEIPT DATES: Applications submitted in response to this program announcement will be accepted at the standard application deadlines, which are available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/dates.htm. Application deadlines are also indicated in the PHS 398 application kit. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR R21 APPLICATIONS All application instructions outlined in the PHS 398 application kit are to be followed, with the following requirements for R21 applications: 1. R21 applications will use the "MODULAR GRANT" and "JUST-IN-TIME" concepts, with direct costs requested in $25,000 modules, up to the total direct costs limit of $100,000 per year. 2. Although preliminary data are not required for an R21 application, they may be included. 3. Sections a-d of the Research Plan of the R21 application may not exceed 15 pages, including tables and figures. 4. R21 appendix materials should be limited, as is consistent with the exploratory nature of the R21 mechanism, and should not be used to circumvent the page limit for the research plan. Copies of appendix material will only be provided to the primary reviewers of the application and will not be reproduced for wider distribution. The following materials may be included in the appendix: o Up to five publications, including manuscripts (submitted or accepted for publication), abstracts, patents, or other printed materials directly relevant to the project. These may be stapled as sets. o Surveys, questionnaires, data collection instruments, and clinical protocols. These may be stapled as sets. o Original glossy photographs or color images of gels, micrographs, etc., provided that a photocopy (may be reduced in size) is also included within the 15 page limit of items a-d of the research plan SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR MODULAR GRANT APPLICATIONS: Applications requesting up to $250,000 per year in direct costs must be submitted in a modular grant format. The modular grant format simplifies the preparation of the budget in these applications by limiting the level of budgetary detail. Applicants request direct costs in $25,000 modules. Section C of the research grant application instructions for the PHS 398 (rev. 5/2001) at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html includes step- by-step guidance for preparing modular grants. Additional information on modular grants is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICATIONS REQUESTING $500,000 OR MORE PER YEAR: Applications requesting $500,000 or more in direct costs for any year must include a cover letter identifying the NIH staff member within one of NIH institutes or centers who has agreed to accept assignment of the application. Applicants requesting more than $500,000 must carry out the following steps: 1) Contact the IC program staff at least 6 weeks before submitting the application, i.e., as you are developing plans for the study, 2) Obtain agreement from the IC staff that the IC will accept your application for consideration for award, and, 3) Identify, in a cover letter sent with the application, the staff member and IC who agreed to accept assignment of the application. This policy applies to all investigator-initiated new (type 1), competing continuation (type 2), competing supplement, or any amended or revised version of these grant application types. Additional information on this policy is available in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, October 19, 2001 at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-004.html. SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH: Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the checklist, and five signed photocopies in one package to: Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710 Bethesda, MD 20892-7710 Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service) APPLICATION PROCESSING: Applications must be received by or mailed before the receipt dates described at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/submissionschedule.htm. The CSR will not accept any application in response to this PA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial review unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. The CSR will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed. This does not preclude the submission of a substantial revision of an application already reviewed, but such application must include an Introduction addressing the previous critique. PEER REVIEW PROCESS Applications submitted for this PA will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines. An appropriate scientific review group convened in accordance with the standard NIH peer review procedures(http://www.csr.nih.gov/refrev.htm) will evaluate applications for scientific and technical merit. As part of the initial merit review, all applications will: o Receive a written critique o Undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of applications under review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score o Receive a second level review by the appropriate national advisory council or board REVIEW CRITERIA The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health. In the written comments, reviewers will be asked to discuss the following aspects of your application in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals: o Significance o Approach o Innovation o Investigator o Environment The scientific review group will address and consider each of these criteria in assigning your application"s overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application. Your application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For example, you may propose to carry out important work that by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move a field forward. (1) SIGNIFICANCE: Does your study address an important problem? If the aims of your application are achieved, how do they advance scientific knowledge? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field? (2) APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Do you acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? (3) INNOVATION: Does your project employ novel concepts, approaches or methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does your project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? (4) INVESTIGATOR: Are you appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to your experience level as the principal investigator and to that of other researchers (if any)? (5) ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which your work will be one contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support? ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA: In addition to the above criteria, your application will also be reviewed with respect to the following: PROTECTIONS: The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans, animals, or the environment, to the extent they may be adversely affected by the project proposed in the application. INCLUSION: The adequacy of plans to include subjects from both genders, all racial and ethnic groups (and subgroups), and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be evaluated. (See Inclusion Criteria included in the section on Federal Citations, below) DATA SHARING: The adequacy of the proposed plan to share data. BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested period of support in relation to the proposed research. AWARD CRITERIA Applications submitted in response to a PA will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications. The following will be considered in making funding decisions: o Scientific merit of the proposed project as determined by peer review o Availability of funds o Relevance to program priorities REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS MONITORING PLAN AND DATA SAFETY AND MONITORING BOARD: Research components involving Phase I and II clinical trials must include provisions for assessment of patient eligibility and status, rigorous data management, quality assurance, and auditing procedures. In addition, it is NIH policy that all clinical trials require data and safety monitoring, with the method and degree of monitoring being commensurate with the risks (NIH Policy for Data Safety and Monitoring, NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, June 12, 1998: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html. INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH: It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their subpopulations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided indicating that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). All investigators proposing clinical research should read the AMENDMENT "NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research - Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts on October 9, 2001 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html), a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm. The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition of clinical research, updated racial and ethnic categories in compliance with the new OMB standards, clarification of language governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials consistent with the new PHS Form 398, and updated roles and responsibilities of NIH staff and the extramural community. The policy continues to require for all NIH- defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) all applications or proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable, and b) investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group differences. INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS: The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them. This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for receipt dates after October 1, 1998. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as participants in research involving human subjects that is available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm. REQUIRED EDUCATION ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECT PARTICIPANTS: NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject participants for all investigators submitting NIH proposals for research involving human subjects. You will find this policy announcement in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts Announcement, dated June 5, 2000, at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html. HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS (hESC): Criteria for federal funding of research on hESCs can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/stem_cells.htm and at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-005.html. Only research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal funding (see http://escr.nih.gov). It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the official NIH identifier(s)for the hESC line(s)to be used in the proposed research. Applications that do not provide this information will be returned without review. PUBLIC ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been revised to provide public access to research data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1) first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in part with Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is important for applicants to understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH has provided guidance at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm. Applicants may wish to place data collected under this PA in a public archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application should include a description of the archiving plan in the study design and include information about this in the budget justification section of the application. In addition, applicants should think about how to structure informed consent statements and other human subjects procedures given the potential for wider use of data collected under this award. URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES: All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page limitations. Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation, Internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide information necessary to the review because reviewers are under no obligation to view the Internet sites. Furthermore, we caution reviewers that their anonymity may be compromised when they directly access an Internet site. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This PA is related to one or more of the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at ttp://www.health.gov/healthypeople. AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS: This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.847 and is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. Awards are made under authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284 and administered under NIH grants policies described at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke- free workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices
| ||||||
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health® |