NIMH POLICY FOR CAREER AWARDS (K-SERIES): CHANGE OF INSTITUTION NIH GUIDE,Volume 26, Number 15, May 9, 1997 P.T. 34 Keywords: Grants Administration/Policy+ National Institute of Mental Health This notice is intended to provide current National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) career award (K-series) holders with the latest policy clarification regarding change of institution. This policy applies to all existing individual career development awards, including those awarded under previous program announcements (such as the K20 and K21 awards), prior to the issuance of the new NIH-wide career award program announcements (see below), but does not apply to programmatic career development awards (K12). This notice supplements the two previous notices, which appeared in the NIH Guide: (1) NIMH Supplemental Information to the NIH Career Development Announcements (K Awards) (NIH Guide, Vol. 24, No. 18, May 19, 1995); and (2) NIMH Policy Changes for Career Awards (K-Series) and Supplemental Instructions to the NIH K Award Program Announcements (NIH GUIDE, Vol. 25, No. 31, Sept. 20, 1996). The program announcements addressed in this Notice are the following: PA-95-049: Mentored Research Scientist Development Award (K01) PA-95-050: Independent Scientist Award (K02) PA-95-051: Senior Scientist Award (K05) PA-95-052: Academic Career Award (K07) PA-95-053: Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Award (K08) PAR-95-040: Mentored Scientist Development Award for New Minority Faculty (K01) POLICY STATEMENT Effective immediately, this notice applies to the "Termination or Change of Institution" section of the above listed Program Announcements. More specifically, however, this policy applies to Change of Institution: If the individual is moving to another eligible institution, and wishes to transfer the K Award to the new institution, the following steps should be carried out: o An abbreviated (see below) application must be submitted by the new institution. o The period of support requested can be no more than the time remaining within the existing original award project period. o The request must be submitted at least three months in advance of the desired effective date to allow the necessary time for staff review. No transfer will be allowed for awards with less than six months remaining in the project period. Note: NIMH will continue to allow an awardee to transfer from one institution to another for the last year of the award, with prior approval of the responsible Program Official (Project Officer). However, no transfer will be allowed during a period of administrative extension or after the project has terminated. The abbreviated application (use Form PHS 398, Research Career Award Section), which will initially be evaluated by the Project Officer, should provide detailed information in the areas outlined below: Section I: Basic Administrative Data A complete face page (AA) should provide information on all items and include all appropriate signatures. The "abstract" page (BB) should include a brief summary of the goals of the research and career plans, as well as the reason(s) for the transfer of institution, and identify key personnel. The table of contents substitute page (LL) should be used to indicate the page numbers for appropriate sections (see ahead). The budget pages (DD and EE) should provide information for the period of support remaining within the existing award project period. Budgets in the new application cannot exceed the amounts previously approved for the same project periods. Justifications are required for any costs that differ significantly from previously approved budget items (e.g., personnel costs, equipment, other expenses). The biographical sketch and other support pages (FF and GG) should include only information relevant to the transfer. The resources page (HH) and continuations, as necessary, should provide detailed information about the new institution. A completed checklist (page II) is required, and the personnel effort report page (JJ) should be included if new collaborators have been added. The personal data page (KK) should be omitted. Section II: Specialized Information 1. The Candidate. Part (a). Letters of Reference (for mentored awards): New letters of reference are not required. Parts (b, c, d). Candidate's background, Career Goals, and Career Development: Since this is an important aspect of a career development award, provide (where pertinent) detailed information on these topics. Give examples of how the career goals and development might be enhanced by the move to the new institution. 2. Statement by Sponsor(s), Consultant(s), and Collaborator(s). Provide detailed information, if sponsor(s), consultant(s) and/or collaborator(s) will change from the original application, or the applicant's modes of interaction with these individuals will differ. It is critically important to provide a detailed statement by any new sponsor(s) for mentored career development awards (K01, K07, K08, K20, K21), especially indicating the scientific credentials of the new sponsor. 3. Environment and Institutional Commitment to Candidate. Parts (a, b). This section is perhaps the most important in terms of evaluation of the merit of the request to transfer the grant to another institution. Applicants should carefully read and follow not only the guidelines in form PHS 398, but should pay particular attention to the section on Institutional Environment and Commitment in the "NIMH Policy Changes for Career Awards (K-Series) and Supplemental Instructions to the NIH K Award Program Announcements" (NIH GUIDE, Vol. 25, No. 31, Sept. 20, 1996). 4. Research Plan. Describe any changes to the original research plan, and explain how the research plan may be enhanced by the move to the new institution. K02 and K05 awardees should give examples of potential new collaborations (provide letters of commitment under #2 above) which might improve the overall plan. NIMH Staff Review: Prior to the final year of awards, transfer of career grants to another institution may be approved, without peer review, under the circumstances stipulated below. Therefore, early consultation with NIMH Program staff is critical for transfer of the grant to a new institution. It is strongly recommended that potential applicants contact the individuals identified below under INQUIRIES for consultation and guidance, prior to contacting the responsible Project Officer, to whom the abbreviated application should be sent. The Project Officer's review will be based on the degree to which the goals of the original peer reviewed application (as evidenced in the most recent summary statement) will be met in the new institution. Critical among these considerations will be the continued capacity to carry out full-time research; potential to contribute significantly to the scientific field of study as evidenced by research productivity; clear and high likelihood that the new environment will contribute to scientific development and productivity; scientific and technical merit of the research plan and its consistency with the career development plan; the new mentor's research and mentoring qualifications in the scientific area of study; and strong institutional environment and commitment. After consideration, the Project Officer will recommend, to the Director of the funding Division, either approval or disapproval of the requested transfer. In the event of disapproval (which will not be subject to request for reconsideration), the grantee has the option of submitting a new, complete application from the new institution which will be peer reviewed in the next review cycle. INQUIRIES Henry Khachaturian, Ph.D. Division of Neuroscience and Behavioral Science 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 11-103 Rockville, MD 20857 Telephone: (301) 443-8033 FAX: (301) 443-1731 Email: [email protected] Kenneth G. Lutterman, Ph.D.
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||||