Request for Information (RFI): Registration and Results Reporting Standards for Prospective Basic Science Studies Involving Human Participants

Notice Number: NOT-OD-18-217

Key Dates
Release Date: August 10, 2018

Related Announcements
None

Issued by
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Purpose

In the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (Public Law 115-141), Congress reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring access to the results of the NIH-funded clinical trials through timely registration and results information reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov. However, researchers conducting fundamental research studies involving human participants are requesting the opportunity to provide additional consultation regarding NIH’s Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information. The policy was published in the Federal Register on September 21, 2016 (81 FR 64982).

Through this Request for Information, NIH is requesting input on the standards NIH should use in assuring adequate registration and results information reporting for fundamental research studies involving human participants hereafter referred to as “prospective basic science studies involving human participants.”

As stated in NOT-OD-18-212, NIH is defining “fundamental research” as stated in the 2018 appropriations bill as equivalent to “basic research” as defined in 32 CFR 272.3 as a “systematic study directed toward greater knowledge or understanding of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and of observable facts without specific applications towards processes or products in mind.”

Background

Over the past six years, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has considered, developed, issued, and begun to implement policies designed to enhance transparency and oversight of the clinical trials it conducts or funds. These policies addressed two overarching problems:

  • Many investigators who conduct NIH-funded clinical trials fail to publicize their trials’ main results, in a timely manner (e.g. within two years of completion). This serious under-reporting problem was first noted in 2012, was confirmed in 2013, and was confirmed again in 2016. Furthermore, it appears that the problem is particularly serious for those trials which don’t focus on classic “clinical” endpoints (like death or heart attack).

In October 2014 NIH issued a definition of clinical trials. In November 2014, NIH issued a proposed policy to require registration and reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov of all trials it funds, not just those trials covered under the FDAAA. NIH received ~240 comments, comments from individuals, organizations, and societies (including the Federation of American Societies of Experimental Biology which represents over 100,000 basic scientists). In September 2016 NIH issued its policy on registration and reporting. At the same time, it issued policies to assure, as recommended by the GAO, proper oversight of trials; these policies covered processes affecting applications and training.

Since September 2016 the NIH has taken steps to communicate its clinical trials policies. These steps include the original Federal Register notice, multiple blogs, posts in the NIH Guide, published articles in high-circulation medical journals, dedicated web pages, presentations at major meetings, and published articles / interviews (e.g. in Nature Human Behavior).

NIH recognizes that not all studies that meet the definition of “clinical trial” are “clinical,” that is a study that occurs within a clinical environment or that tests a clinical intervention (like a drug or implanted device). For example, some trials test public health interventions (like programs to enhance physical activity in schools) which occur entirely outside the clinical sphere. Other trials are aimed at answering basic science questions; in other words, they are conducting prospective experiments on human participants without any specific applications towards processes or products in mind. As of August 1, 2018, ClinicalTrials.gov contains 10,199 interventional study records listing
"basic science" as the primary purpose. Of those, over 1700 also list a study start date of after January 18, 2017, the effective date of the Final Rule and NIH policy.

NIH recognizes that there is concern about applying its registration and reporting policy (as described in the Federal Register on September 21, 2016) to research studies that meet the NIH definition of clinical trials as described here and meet the definition for basic research, but do not meet the FDAAA definition of “applicable clinical trials.” Basic research is “systematic study directed toward greater knowledge or understanding of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and of observable fact without specific applications towards processes or products in mind.” We have designated basic research studies that meet the NIH definition of a clinical trial as “prospective basic science studies involving human participants.”

Request for Information

This RFI seeks additional input from stakeholders throughout the scientific research community and the general public regarding how best to implement the NIH Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information (NOT-OD-16-149) for prospective basic science studies involving human participants. NIH is specifically interested in learning more about studies that meet the NIH definition of a clinical trial (NOT-OD-15-015) but are not defined as applicable clinical trials (42 CFR Part 11), and also meet the definition of fundamental research.

NIH is equating “fundamental research” as stated in the 2018 appropriations act with “basic research” as defined in 32 CFR 272.3 as a “systematic study directed toward greater knowledge or understanding of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and of observable facts without specific applications towards processes or products in mind.” NIH is considering prospective basic science studies involving human participants to be those that overlap with both the definition of fundamental research and the definition of a clinical trial.

The NIH seeks comments on any of the following topics:

  • Specific examples of prospective basic science studies involving human participants that pose the greatest challenges in meeting the registration and results information submission requirements at ClinicalTrials.gov, including specific reasons for these challenges (e.g., specific data elements);
  • Strengths and weaknesses of potential alternative platforms that might function as conduits for timely registration and reporting of prospective basic science studies involving human participants;
  • Additional data elements or modification to existing data elements that could be applied to ClinicalTrials.gov to better meet the needs of the public and of researchers in assuring timely registration and results information submission of prospective basic science studies involving human participants;
  • Other existing reporting standards for prospective basic science studies involving human participants and how such standards would fulfill the aims described in the NIH Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information; and
  • Any other point the respondent feels is relevant for NIH to consider in implementing this policy for timely registration and reporting of prospective basic science studies involving human participants.

To inform comments on this RFI, NIH recommends reviewing the ClinicalTrials.gov registration and results information submission requirements as described in the PRS User’s Guide. The guide provides an overview of the submission process and requirements for registration and results data elements, validation rules, as well as the quality control (QC) review criteria. Sections 9 and 10 of the PRS User’s Guide also describes how content can be transferred to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study sponsor or investigator using the XML upload mechanism. ClinicalTrials.gov requirements can be further explored using the test version of the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS); contact [email protected] to request access to the PRS Test system.

Responses

Responses to this RFI must be submitted electronically at: 
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/rfi/rfi.cfm?ID=80

Responses must be received by November 12, 2018.

Responses to this RFI are voluntary. Do not include any proprietary, classified, confidential, trade secret, or sensitive information in your response. The responses will be reviewed by NIH staff, and individual feedback will not be provided to any responder. The Government will use the information submitted in response to this RFI at its discretion. The Government reserves the right to use any submitted information on public NIH websites, in reports, in summaries of the state of the science, in any possible resultant solicitation(s), grant(s), or cooperative agreement(s), or in the development of future funding opportunity announcements.

This RFI is for information and planning purposes only and shall not be construed as a solicitation, grant, or cooperative agreement, or as an obligation on the part of the Federal Government, the NIH, or individual NIH Institutes and Centers to provide support for any ideas identified in response to it. The Government will not pay for the preparation of any information submitted or for the Government’s use of such information. No basis for claims against the U.S. Government shall arise as a result of a response to this request for information or from the Government’s use of such information.

NIH looks forward to your input and we hope that you will share this RFI document with your colleagues.

Inquiries

Please direct all inquiries to:

NIH Grants Information
Email: [email protected] (preferred method of contact)