Full Text HD-94-004 GENETICS AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HUMAN OOCYTES NIH GUIDE, Volume 22, Number 17, April 30, 1993 RFA: HD-94-004 P.T. 34 Keywords: Human Reproduction/Fertility Physiology, Human Genetics National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Letter of Intent Receipt Date: July 26, 1993 Application Receipt Date: September 8, 1993 PURPOSE The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) invites research grant applications for the support of studies of the genetics and physiology of human oocytes that may lead to improvements in the alleviation of infertility or the acquisition of a better understanding of mechanisms regulating fertility that may lead to new approaches to contraception. An important part of the mission of the NICHD is to gain new knowledge about human reproduction and this Request for Applications (RFA) is intended to address that charge. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This RFA, Genetics and Physiology of Human Oocytes, is related to the priority area of family planning. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report: Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202/783-3238). ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign for-profit and non-profit organizations, public and private. Minority individuals, persons with disabilities, and women are encouraged to apply. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT This RFA will use the NIH individual research project grant (R01). Responsibility for the planning, direction and execution of the proposed project will be solely that of the applicant. The total project period for applications submitted in response to the present RFA may not exceed five years. The earliest expected award date is April 1, 1994. This RFA is a one-time solicitation. Future unsolicited competing continuation applications will compete with all investigator-initiated applications and be reviewed according to the customary peer review procedures. Because the nature and scope of the research proposed in response to this RFA may vary, it is anticipated that the size of an award will vary also. It is anticipated that most of the awards will go to new applications but competing renewal applications for an ongoing research project may be submitted in response to this RFA. FUNDS AVAILABLE It is expected that up to four new applications will be funded, within the direct cost limit of $800,000 available for the first year. This level of support is dependent upon the receipt of a sufficient number of applications of high scientific merit. Although this program is provided for in the financial plans of the NICHD, awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the availability of funds for this purpose. BACKGROUND The overall goal of this RFA is to stimulate and support research on the gain of knowledge of genetic and physiological regulatory mechanisms in human oocytes. The motivation to learn more about the basic biology of human oocytes is that they are of enormous scientific and medical importance; there are demonstrable needs for this information; there is availability of human oocytes through current medical procedures; and there are dramatic new technological advances that can be applied to human oocytes. Among the most pressing needs are: (1) the need for improved methods to alleviate infertility and to understand the causes of infertility, (2) the need for new contraceptive leads that are effective before fertilization, (3) the need for improved genetic analysis before fertilization, and (4) in the support of the above three needs, the need to assess the quality of an individual human oocyte in the context of its potential for fertilization and development into a healthy offspring. Beneficiaries of this initiative will be those who are interested in the various problems represented by the needs given above, such as infertility, contraception, environmental, aging and disease effects upon female germ cells, birth defects, as well as the fundamental developmental biology of human oocytes. Despite this display of profound needs and numerous beneficiaries, our scientific knowledge of the human oocyte is negligible at a time when our current molecular genetic and cell physiological techniques are of such high resolution that they can be applied to single cells, such as oocytes. The results of studies generated by this RFA are expected to substantially advance our knowledge base of the genetic and physiological mechanisms that regulate the developmental program of human oocyte maturation. There is much evidence that substantial differences exist among the species for a number of experimental and observational parameters, such that increased knowledge about human oocytes must be obtained directly through experiments and observations on human oocytes. Even with our present, rapidly improving technology, there are many unanswered questions about mammalian reproduction owing partly to the complexity of mammalian reproduction and to the difficulty in doing experiments on the relatively small numbers of mammalian oocytes. The complexity of reproduction in humans is magnified owing to the long fertile period for both males and females. Indeed, it is of great importance to better understand the reasons for the unusually high incidence of infertility in humans compared with other mammals. It has been estimated that as many as 60 percent of human fertilized eggs do not develop into a live offspring under normal conditions, owing to immunological causes, chromosome or genetic abnormalities, and other physiological causes. Some of this failure is likely to be due to the estimated 30 percent of ovulated human eggs that have obvious chromosomal abnormalities. There is also the complication that, for many purposes and reasons, mammalian oocytes and embryos must be studied as single eggs or embryos. Now, the recent development and refinement of a number of cell physiological and molecular genetic techniques that can be applied to single cells or embryos can be applied to single human oocytes. There have been recent dramatic advances in our ability to culture oocytes of mice and other mammals. Also, through a variety of medical procedures in common practice, there is availability of sufficient human oocytes that would otherwise be discarded. Thus, it is evident that the need, the availability and the technology exist for high resolution studies on single human oocytes. The end result is expected to be a greatly increased ability to obtain, identify and characterize high quality human oocytes. Three recent NIH conferences and a detailed Institute of Medicine study have emphasized the dramatic new advances in mammalian oocyte culture systems and the rapidly advancing high resolution technologies for cell physiological and molecular genetic analysis of single mammalian oocytes. At the same meetings, discussions were held of the future research needs in the field of mammalian gametogenesis and other areas of reproduction. Among these was a need for application of these recent advances to human oocytes. The conferences and study were October 1991, "Meiosis II: Contemporary Approaches;" February 1992, "Opportunities in Contraception: Research and Development;" May 1992, "Physiology of Mammalian Oocytes and Preimplantation Embryos;" 1989, "Medically Assisted Conception," (National Academy Press). It should be noted that the use of federal funds for research on human in vitro fertilization presently requires the review, prior to award, by an authorized Ethics Advisory Board. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Owing to the recognition that the key endpoint of experiments on human oocytes will be the production of high quality eggs, a principal, but not exclusive, target of this RFA is to study oocyte maturation in which the oocyte undergoes germinal vesicle break down (GVBD), first polar body release, and progression to metaphase of Meiosis II. This competence to mature can indicate that an egg is fertilizable and is therefore a particularly important criterion for egg quality. In addition, successful maturation itself is a valuable endpoint for studies conducted on earlier phases of oocyte growth and development. In this context, studies of the development of preantral follicles would be another principal target of this competition. In general, the entire range of genetic, molecular, and cell physiological assessments of human oocytes would be within the research objectives of this RFA, including approaches that would lead to improved culture conditions. Noninvasive assessments or steps leading to the development of noninvasive assessments of single human oocytes would be of particular interest and importance to the goals of this RFA. For the purpose of this RFA, genetics and physiology of human oocytes would include, but not be limited to, the following topics that would primarily focus upon oocytes in culture: o regulation of growth and differentiation of oocytes o regulation of meiosis o role of hormones in oocyte maturation in vitro o cytoplasmic and nuclear maturation o interaction between oocytes and surrounding somatic cells o culture of oocyte-cumulus complexes o regulation of oocyte cell cycle events Experimental designs could include, but are not limited to, molecular, genetic, cell physiological, biochemical, and nutritional approaches. It is anticipated that some of these approaches would include high-resolution, noninvasive methods to assess the quality or condition of single human oocytes. STUDY POPULATIONS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF NIH POLICIES CONCERNING INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY POPULATIONS NIH policy is that applicants for NIH clinical research grants and cooperative agreements are required to include minorities in study populations so that research findings can be of benefit to all persons at risk of the disease, disorder or condition under study; special emphasis must be placed on the need for inclusion of minorities in studies of diseases, disorders and conditions which disproportionately affect them. If minorities are excluded or inadequately represented in clinical research, particularly in proposed population-based studies, a clear compelling rationale must be provided. The composition of the proposed study population must be described in terms of racial/ethnic group. In addition, racial/ethnic issues must be addressed in developing a research design and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the study. This information must be included in the form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) in Sections 1-4 of the Research Plan AND summarized in Section 5, Human Subjects. Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of including the broadest possible representation of minority groups. However, NIH recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in all research projects to include representation of the full array of United States racial/ethnic minority populations (i.e., Native Americans [including American Indians or Alaskan Natives], Asian/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics). The rationale for studies on single minority population groups should be provided. For the purpose of this policy, clinical research is defined as human biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention (and preventive strategies), diagnosis, or treatment of diseases, disorders or conditions, including, but not limited to, clinical trials. The usual NIH policies concerning research on human subjects also apply. Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues cannot be identified or linked to individuals are excluded. However, every effort should be made to include human tissues from racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to apply the results of the study broadly, and this should be addressed by applicants. For foreign awards, since the definition of minority differs in other countries, the applicant must discuss the relevance of research involving foreign population groups to the United States' populations, including minorities. If the required information is not contained within the application, the application will be returned. Peer reviewers will address specifically whether the research plan in the application conforms to these policies. If the representation of minorities in a study design is inadequate to answer the scientific question(s) addressed AND the justification for the selected study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific weakness or deficiency in the study design and reflected in assigning the priority score to the application. All applications for clinical research submitted to NIH are required to address these policies. NIH funding components will not award grants or cooperative agreements that do not comply with these policies. LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are strongly encouraged, but not required, to submit, by July 26, 1993, a letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the proposed research, the name, address and telephone number of the Principal Investigator, the identities of other key personnel and participating institutions, and the number and title of the RFA in response to which the application may be submitted. Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of subsequent applications, the information that it contains allows NICHD staff to estimate the potential review workload and to avoid conflict of interest circumstances in the review process. The letter of intent is to be sent to Dr. Richard J. Tasca at the address listed under INQUIRIES. APPLICATION PROCEDURES The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) is to be used in applying for these grants. These forms are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research and from the Office of Grants Inquiries, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, Westwood Building, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone 301/710-0267. The RFA label available in the PHS 398 application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the application. Failure to use this label could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. In addition, the RFA title and number must be typed on line 2a of the face page of the application form and the YES box must be marked. Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the Checklist, and three signed photocopies, in one package to: Division of Research Grants National Institutes of Health Westwood Building, Room 240 Bethesda, MD 20892** At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application must be sent to: Susan Streufert, Ph.D. Division of Scientific Review National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5E03 Bethesda, MD 20892 Applications must be received by September 8, 1993. If an application is received after that date, it will be returned to the applicant. The Division of Research Grants (DRG) will not accept any application in response to this announcement that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. The DRG will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed. This does not preclude the submission of substantial revisions of applications already reviewed, but such applications must include an introduction addressing the previous critique. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed by NICHD staff for completeness and responsiveness. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. If the application is not responsive to the RFA, it will be returned to the applicant, who may then submit it to DRG for review in competition with unsolicited applications at the next available review cycle. Responsive applications may be triaged by a peer review group to determine their relative competitiveness. The NIH will withdraw from further competition those applications judged to be noncompetitive for award and notify the applicant Principal Investigator and institutional official. Those applications judged to be competitive will undergo further evaluation for scientific merit. Those applications that are complete and responsive will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria stated below for scientific/technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened by the NICHD. The second level of review will be provided by the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development (NACHHD) Council. Review criteria for RFAs are generally the same as those for unsolicited research grant applications, including: o scientific, technical, or medical significance and originality of proposed research; o appropriateness and adequacy of the experimental approach and methodology proposed to carry out the research; o qualifications and research experience of the Principal Investigator and staff, and of collaborators, if applicable; o adequacy of time and effort dedicated to the project; o availability of the resources necessary to perform the research; o appropriateness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to the proposed research. AWARD CRITERIA The earliest anticipated date of the award is April 1, 1994. Funding decisions will be based upon peer review and NACHHD Council recommendations, program relevance, and availability of funds. INQUIRIES Written and telephone inquiries concerning this RFA are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Direct inquiries regarding scientific issues and address the letter of intent to: Richard J. Tasca, Ph.D. Center for Population Research National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 8B01 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-6515 FAX: (301) 496-0962 Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Melinda Nelson Office of Grants and Contracts National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 8B17 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-5481 AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.864, Population Research. Awards are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Title IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42 USC 241 and 285) and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Part 74. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12374 or Health Systems Agency review. .
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||||