CORE CENTERS FOR MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
RELEASE DATE: November 21, 2002 (see reissue RFA-AR-05-003)
RFA: AR-03-004
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
(NIAMS)
(http://www.niams.nih.gov)
LETTER OF INTENT RECEIPT DATE: April 13, 2003
APPLICATION RECEIPT DATE: May 13, 2003
THIS RFA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
o Purpose of this RFA
o Research Objectives
o Mechanism(s) of Support
o Funds Available
o Eligible Institutions
o Individuals Eligible to Become Principal Investigators
o Special Requirements
o Where to Send Inquiries
o Letter of Intent
o Submitting an Application
o Peer Review Process
o Review Criteria
o Receipt and Review Schedule
o Award Criteria
o Required Federal Citations:
PURPOSE OF THIS RFA
The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin
Diseases (NIAMS) invites applications for research core centers (P30s)
for musculoskeletal disorders. The Core Centers for Musculoskeletal
Disorders (CCMDs) will provide the resources for a number of
established, currently funded investigators, often from different
disciplines, to adopt a multidisciplinary approach to common research
problems in musculoskeletal disorders and to ensure greater
productivity than from each of the separate projects.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Research in musculoskeletal disorders is at a stage where a number of
areas are making broad advances that can be effectively fostered by
research core centers. Examples of these areas include, but are not
limited to:
o Regulation of skeletal growth and remodeling by systemic and local
factors; diagnostic markers of skeletal remodeling; genetic basis of
skeletal morphogenesis, growth, and disease.
o Mechanisms of bone repair and regeneration, including fracture
healing; development of techniques for growth plate repair,
reconstitution of large defects, and limb lengthening, including use of
autografts and allografts, and distraction osteogenesis.
o Mechanisms of cartilage repair and regeneration, including
chondroprogenitor cell biology, genetics, and biomechanical signaling;
development of techniques for chondroprotection and repair of the
articular surface, including gene therapy approaches.
The investigators make the choice of research area upon which the CCMD
would focus.
The CCMDs will provide support for:
1. Core resources and facilities to be used by investigators of
individually supported research projects in order to enhance and
coordinate their activities. This support may include personnel,
equipment, supplies, services, and facilities.
2. Up to $100,000 yearly in direct costs for pilot and feasibility
studies.
3. Program enrichment activities.
4. Administrative Core
A CCMD should be an identifiable organizational unit within a
university-affiliated medical center. An Administrative Core should be
proposed to coordinate the Center and administer the program enrichment
activities. Two or more research cores must be proposed. A research
core is a facility shared by two or more Center investigators that
enables them to conduct their independently funded individual research
projects more efficiently and/or more effectively. Cores generally
fall into one of four categories: (1) provision of a technology that
lends itself to automation or preparation in large batches (e.g.,
histology and tissue culture); (2) complex instrumentation (e.g.,
electron microscopy); (3) animal preparation and care; and (4) service
and training (e.g., molecular biology, biostatistics); (5)
genetics/sequencing and (6) bioengineering.
A pilot and feasibility study program provides modest research support
($20,000 - $50,000 yearly) for a limited time (1 to 3 years) to enable
eligible investigators to explore the feasibility of a musculoskeletal
disorders-related concept and amass sufficient data to pursue it
through other funding mechanisms. An investigator is eligible only
once every 5 years. Eligible investigators include:
1. An established investigator in musculoskeletal disorders or related
areas with a proposal for testing the feasibility of a new or
innovative idea that is musculoskeletal disorders-related but
represents a clear and distinct departure from the investigator's
ongoing research interest;
2. An established, supported investigator with no previous work in
musculoskeletal disorders or related areas who is willing to test the
applicability of his/her expertise on a musculoskeletal disorders-
related problem; and
3. A new investigator who has not been a principal investigator in a
past or current NIH research project grant (R01, R29, P01) or a current
R55 grant. New investigators should be clearly independent and have a
faculty appointment higher than that of postdoctoral fellow or research
associate.
Applicants from institutions which have a General Clinical Research
Center (GCRC) funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources
may wish to identify the GCRC as a resource for conducting the proposed
research. Details of the interactions of the CCMD staff with the GCRC
staff and research personnel may be provided in a statement describing
the collaborative linkages being developed. A letter of agreement from
the GCRC Program Director must be included with the application.
MECHANISM OF SUPPORT
This RFA will use NIH P30 award mechanism. As an applicant you will be
solely responsible for planning, directing, and executing the proposed
project. This RFA is a one-time solicitation. Future competing-
continuation applications based on this project will be the subject of
a future RFA. The anticipated award date is April 1, 2004.
This RFA uses just-in-time concepts.
FUNDS AVAILABLE
NIAMS intends to commit approximately $1.2 million in FY 2004 to fund
up to 2 new and/or competing-continuation grants in response to this
RFA. An applicant should request a project period of 5 years and a
budget for direct costs of up to $400,000 per year. Although the
financial plans of the NIAMS provide support for this program, awards
pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the availability of funds and
the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS
You may submit (an) application(s) if your institution has any of the
following characteristics:
o For-profit or non-profit organizations
o Public or private institutions, such as universities, colleges,
hospitals, and laboratories
o Faith-based or community-based organizations.
Applications from foreign institutions will not be accepted.
INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO BECOME PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS
Any individual with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to
carry out the proposed research is invited to work with their
institution to develop an application for support. Individuals from
underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with
disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH programs.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
The director and co-director should budget for an annual one-day
meeting in Bethesda, MD with NIAMS staff.
WHERE TO SEND INQUIRIES
We encourage inquiries concerning this RFA and welcome the opportunity
to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries may fall into
three areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants
management issues:
The Guidelines for Core Centers are available at:
http://www.niams.nih.gov/rtac/funding/grants/sdrcwww.htm
General information about the NIAMS Core Center Program may be found
at:
http://www.niams.nih.gov/rtac/funding/grants/centers_programs.htm#P30
o Direct your questions about scientific/research issues to:
Dr. Julia B. Freeman
Centers Program, EP,
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
One Democracy Plaza
6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872 (20817 for courier service)
Telephone: (301)-594-5053
FAX: (301)-480-4543
Email: freemanb@exchange.nih.gov
o Direct your questions about peer review issues to:
Dr. Cheryl A. Kitt
Director, Extramural Program
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
One Democracy Plaza
6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872 (20817 for courier service)
Telephone: (301) 594-2463
FAX: (301) 480-4543
Email: kittc@mail.nih.gov
o Direct your questions about financial or grants management matters
to:
Melinda Nelson
Chief Grants Management Officer, GMB
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
One Democracy Plaza
6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872 (20817 for courier service)
Telephone: (301) 435-5278
FAX: 301-480-5450
Email: nelsonm@exchange.nih.gov
LETTER OF INTENT
Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that
includes the following information:
o Descriptive title of the proposed research
o Name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator
o Names of other key personnel
o Participating institutions
o Number and title of this RFA
Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does
not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information
that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review
workload and plan the review.
The letter of intent is to be sent by the date listed at the beginning
of this document. The letter of intent should be sent to:
Dr. Julia B. Freeman
Centers Program, EP,
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
One Democracy Plaza
6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872 (20817 for courier service)
Telephone: (301)-594-5053
FAX: (301)-480-4543
Email: freemanb@exchange.nih.gov
SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION
Applications must be prepared using the PHS 398 research grant
application instructions and forms (rev. 5/2001). The PHS 398 is
available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html in
an interactive format. For further assistance contact GrantsInfo,
Telephone (301) 710-0267, Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov.
SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS: The Guidelines for Core Centers are
available at: http://www.niams.nih.gov/rtac/funding/grants/sdrcwww.htm
General information about the NIAMS Core Center Program may be found
at:
http://www.niams.nih.gov/rtac/funding/grants/centers_programs.htm#P30
USING THE RFA LABEL: The RFA label available in the PHS 398 (rev.
5/2001) application form must be affixed to the bottom of the face page
of the application. Type the RFA number on the label. Failure to use
this label could result in delayed processing of the application such
that it may not reach the review committee in time for review. In
addition, the RFA title and number must be typed on line 2 of the face
page of the application form and the YES box must be marked. The RFA
label is also available at:
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/label-bk.pdf.
SENDING AN APPLICATION TO THE NIH: Submit a signed, typewritten
original of the application, including the Checklist, and three signed,
photocopies, in one package to:
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, MD 20892-7710
Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service)
At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application
must be sent to:
Review Branch
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
One Democracy Plaza
6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872 (20817 for courier service)
APPLICATION PROCESSING: Applications must be received by the
application receipt date listed in the heading of this RFA. If an
application is received after that date, it will be returned to the
applicant without review.
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will not accept any application
in response to this RFA that is essentially the same as one currently
pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending
application. The CSR will not accept any application that is
essentially the same as one already reviewed. This does not preclude
the submission of substantial revisions of applications already
reviewed, but such applications must include an Introduction addressing
the previous critique.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by the CSR
and responsiveness by the NIAMS. Incomplete and/or non-responsive
applications will be returned to the applicant without further
consideration.
Applications that are complete and responsive to the RFA will be
evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer
review group convened by the NIAMS in accordance with the review
criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, all
applications will:
o Receive a written critique
o Undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the
highest scientific merit, generally the top half of the applications
under review, will be discussed and assigned a priority score
o Receive a second level review by the NIAMS National Advisory Council.
REVIEW CRITERIA
The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of
biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health.
In the written comments, reviewers will be asked to discuss the
following aspects of your application in order to judge the likelihood
that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the
pursuit of these goals:
o Significance
o Approach
o Innovation
o Investigator
o Environment
ADDITIONAL REVIEW CRITERIA: In addition to the above criteria, your
application will also be reviewed with respect to the following:
o PROTECTIONS: The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans,
animals, or the environment, to the extent they may be adversely
affected by the project proposed in the application.
o INCLUSION: The adequacy of plans to include subjects from both
genders, all racial and ethnic groups (and subgroups), and children as
appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Plans for the
recruitment and retention of subjects will also be evaluated. (See
Inclusion Criteria included in the section on Federal Citations, below)
o DATA SHARING: The adequacy of the proposed plan to share data.
o BUDGET: The reasonableness of the proposed budget and the requested
period of support in relation to the proposed research.
o OTHER REVIEW CRITERIA
Applicants should clearly demonstrate the ways in which the CCMD will
build the local research program, will support on-going projects and
will attract both senior and new investigators to research in
musculoskeletal disorders. Review criteria that will be used by the
initial review group (IRG) in the evaluation of the Core Center
applications follow:
1. Evaluation of Cores
A research core is evaluated on the facilities and/or services
provided. Important factors include:
Significance: Will the core have utility to the Core Center research
base (minimum: two independently funded investigators)?
Approach: Are the quality of services high? Are there procedures for
quality control? Is the core cost effective? How is cost
reimbursement proposed?
Innovation: Will the core likely promote interdisciplinary research?
Are unique services offered?
Investigator: Are the personnel appropriate?
Environment: Are the facilities and equipment adequate? Is there
institutional commitment to the core?
2. Evaluation of Pilot and Feasibility Studies (P&Fs)
For individual P&Fs:
Significance: Will the proposed work likely yield meaningful
preliminary data leading to a research proposal?
Approach: Are the experimental approaches adequate?
Innovation: Is the research topic one that promotes innovative new
research related to the core center?
Investigator: Does the investigator meet one of the criteria for P&F
investigators? (If not, the project should not be considered further.)
Environment: Is the project appropriate to the research base of the
core center? Does one or more of the cores offer needed
materials/assistance?
3. Evaluation of the Administrative Core
The Administrative Core is evaluated on the leadership provided.
Important factors include:
Significance: Does the proposed Core Center document coordination of
ongoing research between the separately funded projects and the Core
Center including mechanisms for internal monitoring?
Approach: Is the management proposed appropriate for 1) fiscal
administration, procurement, property and personnel management,
planning, budgeting, etc.; 2) reviewing the use of, and
administering funds for, the pilot and feasibility program? Are the
Core Center budgets appropriate for the proposed and approved work to
be done in core facilities, for pilot and feasibility studies, and for
enrichment in relation to the total Core Center program?
Innovation: Is there a plan for the establishment and maintenance of
internal communication and cooperation among the Core Center
investigators and for an enrichment program that provides outside
review and input?
Investigators: Is there scientific and administrative leadership,
commitment and ability, and adequate time commitment of the Core Center
Director and Associate Director for the effective management of the
Core Center program?
Environment: Have institutional lines of authority and sanction been
documented for the Core Center?
4. Overall Core Center Evaluation
An overall priority score will be assigned to the application. This
score will reflect not only the quality of the cores, administration,
and pilot and feasibility studies, but also the quality of the
research base and how the proposed Core Center will enhance the
research base.
The following elements will be evaluated:
a. The scientific excellence of the Core Center's research base as
well as the relevance and interrelation of these separately funded
research projects to the central themes of the Core Center and the
likelihood for meaningful collaboration among Core Center
investigators. Existence of a base of established independently
supported biomedical research of high quality is a prerequisite
for establishment of a Core Center.
b. The application must convey how the proposed Core Center will
enhance significantly the cited research base established at the host
institution. In a competing continuation application, the application
should document an impact of the Core Center. This includes the
qualifications, experience, and commitment of the Core Center
investigators and their willingness to interact with each other. This
also includes efficient and effective use and/or planned use of
enrichment funds including the contribution of these activities in
enhancing the realization of the Core Center concept.
c. The appropriateness, quality and relevance of the proposed cores,
and the modes of operation, facilities, and potential for contribution
to ongoing research.
d. The proposed management of the pilot and feasibility program and
the scientific merit of the pilot and feasibility projects for which
funds are requested from the Core Center grant. The effectiveness of
the proposed program will serve as a basis for recommendations
concerning the level at which pilot and feasibility studies will be
supported throughout the project period.
e. The overall environment for a Core Center. This includes the
institutional commitment to the program, including lines of
accountability regarding management of the Core Center, and the
institution's partnership with the Core Center, and the institutional
commitment to individuals responsible for conducting essential Core
Center functions. This also includes the academic environment and
resources in which the activities will be conducted, including the
availability of space, equipment, facilities, and the potential for
interaction with scientists from other departments and schools.
Since the NIAMS is interested in funding only the best research,
individual components of lesser quality may not be funded, even if
approved, under the "umbrella" of the Core Center grant mechanism. It
is primarily for this reason that each component will be assigned a
separate merit rating, taking into consideration only its merit as an
individual pilot and feasibility study or core.
RECEIPT AND REVIEW SCHEDULE
Letter of Intent Receipt Date: April 13, 2003
Application Receipt Date: May 13, 2003
Peer Review Date: October/November 2003
Council Review: January 2004
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: April 1, 2004
AWARD CRITERIA
Award criteria that will be used to make award decisions include:
o Scientific merit (as determined by peer review)
o Availability of funds
o Programmatic priorities.
REQUIRED FEDERAL CITATIONS
MONITORING PLAN AND DATA SAFETY AND MONITORING BOARD: Research
components involving Phase I and II clinical trials must include
provisions for assessment of patient eligibility and status, rigorous
data management, quality assurance, and auditing procedures. In
addition, it is NIH policy that all clinical trials require data and
safety monitoring, with the method and degree of monitoring being
commensurate with the risks (NIH Policy for Data Safety and Monitoring,
NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, June 12, 1998:
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html).
INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH: It is the
policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their
sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported clinical research
projects unless a clear and compelling justification is provided
indicating that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of
the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from
the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43).
All investigators proposing clinical research should read the AMENDMENT
"NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in
Clinical Research - Amended, October, 2001," published in the NIH Guide
for Grants and Contracts on October 9, 2001
(https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-001.html); a
complete copy of the updated Guidelines is available at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_amended_10_2001.htm.
The amended policy incorporates: the use of an NIH definition
of clinical research; updated racial and ethnic categories in
compliance with the new OMB standards; clarification of language
governing NIH-defined Phase III clinical trials consistent with the new
PHS Form 398; and updated roles and responsibilities of NIH staff and
the extramural community. The policy continues to require for all NIH-
defined Phase III clinical trials that: a) all applications or
proposals and/or protocols must provide a description of plans to
conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender
and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and b)
investigators must report annual accrual and progress in conducting
analyses, as appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group
differences.
INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN
SUBJECTS: The NIH maintains a policy that children (i.e., individuals
under the age of 21) must be included in all human subjects research,
conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and
ethical reasons not to include them. This policy applies to all initial
(Type 1) applications submitted for receipt dates after October 1,
1998.
All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should
read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the inclusion of children as
participants in research involving human subjects that is available at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm.
REQUIRED EDUCATION ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECT PARTICIPANTS:
NIH policy requires education on the protection of human subject
participants for all investigators submitting NIH proposals for
research involving human subjects. You will find this policy
announcement in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts Announcement,
dated June 5, 2000, at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html.
HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS (hESC): Criteria for federal funding of
research on hESCs can be found at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/stem_cells.htm and at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-005.html.
Only research using hESC lines that are registered in the NIH Human
Embryonic Stem Cell Registry will be eligible for Federal funding (see
http://escr.nih.gov). It is the responsibility of the applicant to
provide the official NIH identifier(s)for the hESC line(s)to be used in
the proposed research. Applications that do not provide this
information will be returned without review.
PUBLIC ACCESS TO RESEARCH DATA THROUGH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT:
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 has been
revised to provide public access to research data through the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) under some circumstances. Data that are (1)
first produced in a project that is supported in whole or in part with
Federal funds and (2) cited publicly and officially by a Federal agency
in support of an action that has the force and effect of law (i.e., a
regulation) may be accessed through FOIA. It is important for
applicants to understand the basic scope of this amendment. NIH has
provided guidance at
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/a110/a110_guidance_dec1999.htm.
Applicants may wish to place data collected under this RFA in a public
archive, which can provide protections for the data and manage the
distribution for an indefinite period of time. If so, the application
should include a description of the archiving plan in the study design
and include information about this in the budget justification section
of the application. In addition, applicants should think about how to
structure informed consent statements and other human subjects
procedures given the potential for wider use of data collected under
this award.
URLs IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES: All applications and
proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within specified page
limitations. Unless otherwise specified in an NIH solicitation,
Internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide information
necessary to the review because reviewers are under no obligation to
view the Internet sites. Furthermore, we caution reviewers that their
anonymity may be compromised when they directly access an Internet
site.
HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010: The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to
achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of
"Healthy People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority
areas. This RFA is related to one or more of the priority areas.
Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2010" at
http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS: This program is described in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.846, Arthritis,
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research. and is not subject to the
intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or
Health Systems Agency review. Awards are made under authorization of
Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42
USC 241 and 284) and administered under NIH grants policies described
at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/policy.htm and under Federal
Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.
The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-
free workplace and discourage the use of all tobacco products. In
addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits
smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a
facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care,
health care, or early childhood development services are provided to
children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and
advance the physical and mental health of the American people.