Full Text AI-93-019 NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DRUG DISCOVERY GROUPS FOR THE TREATMENT OF OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME (NCDDG-OI): TUBERCULOSIS NIH GUIDE, Volume 22, Number 32, September 3, 1993 RFA: AI-93-019 P.T. 34 Keywords: Pulmonary Diseases Screening of Drugs/Agents AIDS National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Letter of Intent Receipt Date: November 15, 1993 Application Receipt Date: January 21, 1994 PURPOSE The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) invites applications for the establishment of National Cooperative Drug Discovery Groups for the Treatment of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (NCDDG-OI) focusing on tuberculosis. It is the purpose of this Request for Applications (RFA) to invite applications focused on the discovery of new, more effective, selective, and diverse therapeutic agents to treat and prevent infection caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Research in the following areas is needed to provide the foundation for improvements in therapeutics for tuberculosis (TB), particularly in the setting of HIV infection: unique metabolic activities for drug targeting; biochemistry and molecular mechanisms of M. tuberculosis-host interactions; inhibitors of enzymatic and regulatory functions and biochemical pathways; mechanisms of overcoming drug resistance; and identification of natural products or synthetic chemical compounds with promise for development as TB therapies. Research activities should be directed toward discovery of selective drugs or molecular strategies that are lethal for M. tuberculosis with minimal toxicity for the host. It is anticipated that multidisciplinary approaches by scientists from a combination of academic, non-profit research, and commercial organizations, with the assistance of the NIAID, will be necessary to effectively accelerate discovery of new therapeutics. Applications that include research projects or core components from the private sector (e.g., pharmaceutical, chemical, or biotechnological companies) are encouraged. M. tuberculosis is the single opportunistic infection targeted in this RFA because of the compelling public health emergency and the need for additional therapies to overcome multi-drug resistant infections. Investigators pursuing similar drug discovery for other AIDS-associated opportunistic infections (OIs) are strongly encouraged to apply through other research support mechanisms. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This RFA, National Cooperative Drug Discovery Groups for the Treatment of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (NCDDG-OI), is related to the priority area of HIV infection. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report: Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238). ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Applications may be submitted by domestic for-profit and non-profit organizations, public and private organizations, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State or local governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government. Applications from minority individuals and women are encouraged. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT Awards will be made as Cooperative Agreements (U01s). The Cooperative Agreement is an assistance mechanism, rather than an acquisition mechanism, in which substantial NIAID programmatic involvement is anticipated. The NIAID will support and/or stimulate research activity by collaborating and otherwise working jointly with the award recipient in a partner role, but is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activity. Details of the responsibilities, relationships, and governance of studies funded under a cooperative agreement are discussed later under SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS. In applying for a cooperative agreement, the Principal Investigator defines his/her objectives in accord with his/her interests and perceptions of approaches to the discovery of new treatments against tuberculosis. The applicant institution and the Principal Investigator will be responsible for the Group's application. Awards will be made to the Principal Investigator's institution on behalf of the Group as a whole and not to individual research projects within the Group. Respondents to this RFA may include new applications for a maximum period of four years support and competitive supplements to currently funded NCDDG-OI Groups for research focused on M. tuberculosis. Because the varied talents and commitment required for effective drug discovery will be from diverse disciplines and may be located at geographically disparate locations, it is anticipated that Project Leaders within a Group may be associated with different institutions. Each application must include two projects from independent laboratories. For the purpose of encouraging new collaborations under this RFA, projects within a single private company will not be considered independent. Similarly, two projects within the same academic department will not be considered independent. The Group will be led by a Principal Investigator who will also lead a scientific project. The applicant institution of the Principal Investigator will provide a Central Operations Office for the Group (usually as part of the Principal Investigator's research project), will be responsible for the performance of the entire Group, and will be accountable for the funds awarded. This RFA is a one-time solicitation. Plans for continued support in this area are indefinite at this time. If by the end of the third year of the award, the NIAID has not announced its intent to re-issue the RFA, incumbents should contact NIAID program staff and consider submitting investigator-initiated (R01) applications that will compete with all investigator-initiated applications and be reviewed according to the customary peer review procedures. Under the Cooperative Agreement, a negotiated partner relationship exists between the recipient of the award and the NIAID in which the Group is responsive to the requirements and conditions set forth in this RFA. The interaction of academic and non-profit research institutions with commercial organizations and the Government is encouraged and is expected to favor expeditious discovery and preclinical development of agents active against tuberculosis and to facilitate their subsequent development for clinical trials. All policies and requirements that govern the grant program of the U.S. Public Health Service and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) apply. FUNDS AVAILABLE At the present time, it is estimated that no more than one to two new Groups will be funded for drug discovery against M. tuberculosis as a result of this RFA. Approximately $3.4 million (including direct and indirect costs) will be available over the four year period, including approximately $0.8 million (direct and indirect) during the first year. Any application received with a budget in excess of $0.8 million total costs (direct and indirect) for the first year will be returned without review. Awards and level of support are dependent on the receipt of a sufficient number of applications of high scientific merit. Because the nature and scope of the research proposed in response to this RFA may vary, it is anticipated that the size of awards will vary also. Budget requests must be adequately justified and commensurate with the complexity of the project. Although this program is provided for in the financial plans of the NIAID, awards pursuant to this RFA are contingent upon the availability of funds for this purpose. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a disease that destroys host immunological defenses against a variety of infections. As of December 31, 1992, 253,448 cases of AIDS had been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and more than 171,890 (67.8%) of these patients have died. Recent projections indicate that between 800,000 to 1,200,000 persons in the United States may be infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the infectious virus associated with AIDS. Opportunistic infections (OIs) are the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in people with AIDS and are the principal reasons for hospitalization. Individuals infected with HIV are susceptible to a range of protozoal, fungal, viral, and bacterial infections. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) remains the most common opportunistic infection reported to the CDC for new cases of AIDS (approximately 50% of cases in 1990). Because of a strong epidemiological association between HIV infection and the development of TB, the CDC has recently included pulmonary TB in the 1993 expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS. Persons co-infected with HIV and TB have an increased risk of developing active and rapidly fatal pulmonary TB compared with persons without HIV infection. In addition, there is an association between lowered CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts in HIV-infected individuals and localized extrapulmonary TB or disseminated or miliary TB. Available drugs to treat opportunistic infections including TB lack the potency to completely eradicate infecting microorganisms without assistance from immune mechanisms. Prolonged HIV-mediated immunosuppression requires prolonged treatment schedules, and prophylaxis regimens against recurrences must often be maintained throughout the remaining lifetime of people with AIDS. Combined infection with HIV and M. tuberculosis has contributed to a public health crisis in many areas of the United States, particularly where health care delivery systems are inadequate. Recent outbreaks of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and the emergence of certain strains resistant to all approved anti-tuberculous therapies poignantly illustrate the critical requirement to identify more effective therapeutic approaches. The need exists for more potent and selective therapeutic agents with activity against the OIs, and particularly multi-drug resistant forms of M. tuberculosis. The NCDDG-OI program was launched in 1990 for the purpose of stimulating discovery research in order to lay the foundation for development and commercialization of therapeutic agents targeted against the AIDS-associated OIs. Within the currently funded NCDDG-OI program, the following approaches are presently being pursued for OIs other than TB, and therefore serve as examples of research approaches: molecular modelling of chemical structures to inhibit vital metabolic enzymes; macrolide transport and activity; immunotherapy; gene cloning, expression, and structure-activity relationships of candidate drugs; inhibitors of protein N-myristoylation, cell wall biosynthesis, topoisomerases; synthesis and assay of drug analogs, unique chemical classes, heterocyclics; development of improved animal models for in vivo drug evaluations. M. tuberculosis is included as an opportunistic pathogen associated with AIDS by the CDC and within the NCDDG-OI program. Previous RFA issuances have focused on: Pneumocystis carinii, Toxoplasma gondii, Cryptosporidium parvum, Mycobacterium avium, Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida albicans, and cytomegalovirus. Similarities that exist between drug targets in M. avium and M. tuberculosis will provide a framework for information exchange between investigators supported as a result of this RFA and those already funded as Groups within the NCDDG-OI program. As part of the cooperative nature of this program, compounds identified as active against any of the OIs may be shared and evaluated by all Groups. Because of the compelling public health need for new, more effective therapies to overcome the threat of multi-drug resistant TB, only research focused on M. tuberculosis will be supported under this re-issuance of the NCDDG-OI program RFA. Research Goals and Objectives of the NCDDG-OI Program The goals of the NCDDG-OI program relative to this RFA are: to foster innovative, multi-disciplinary research, conceptualization and targeted discovery of drugs and strategies to treat and prevent tuberculosis (TB); to support efficacy and pharmacological evaluations leading to selection of candidate therapies through collaboration among investigators and with the NIAID; and to assist in the preclinical development of therapies for evaluation in clinical trials supported by other mechanisms. Scientific Scope, Restrictions, and Exclusions Applications for this NCDDG-OI RFA should stress creative approaches to the discovery of effective therapies to treat TB through a comprehensive team effort. It is recognized that the ultimate objective of selective therapy against microbial infection requires a solid knowledge base of the biology, composition, physiology, molecular biology, and host defense mechanisms against infectious agents. Applications should emphasize the following: specific scientific objectives focusing on targeted drug discovery; integration and coordination of research aims from different scientific disciplines; and research rationales, plans, and approaches designed to identify candidate therapeutics within the support period requested. The Group's objectives and goals must be relevant and compatible with the NCDDG-OI program's missions and directions as stated in this RFA. It is not a requirement of this RFA that a complete development plan for new drugs or biological agents be proposed, although applications which include research projects or core components from the private sector (e.g., pharmaceutical, chemical, or biotechnological companies) are encouraged. Projects focusing on the early phases of new target identification and drug development are appropriate. However, each application must clearly state in an introductory section how information from the proposed projects will directly accelerate new drug discovery and what therapeutic approaches are likely to ultimately derive from these studies. Priority will be given to proposed therapies with potential for combatting multi-drug resistant tuberculosis, improving prophylaxis approaches, practicality of administration to HIV-infected people, and low toxicity. Examples of research projects considered responsive to this RFA include, but are not necessarily restricted to, the following: o Identification and development of drug evaluation assays for molecular targets with selectivity for M. tuberculosis, such as recombination repair mechanisms, elongation factors, cell wall assembly, and others with potential for mycobactericidal consequences of inhibition. o Development of drug evaluation assays for essential mycobacterial gene products, particularly biochemical activities expressed in vivo and associated with pathogenicity. o In vitro and in vivo evaluation of new chemical entities with potential for mycobactericidal activity within a framework of logical plans that examine structure-activity relationships and potential toxicities. o Development, validation, and implementation of drug evaluation systems capable of predicting bactericidal and sterilizing activity of new agents, or combinations of agents against M. tuberculosis. o Studies on the effects of drugs on slow-growing M. tuberculosis, such as those found in granulomatous tubercular lesions, identification of drugs with extended lengths of biological activity, and development of methods to assess post-antibiotic effect on M. tuberculosis. o Development, validation, and implementation of improved models for in vivo drug evaluations, such as immunosuppressed animals, or animals with disrupted interferon-gamma or other immune effector genes. o Development and evaluation of biological entities, such as recombinant mycobacteriophage as drug or suicide gene delivery vehicles, and evaluation of these for efficacy and safety. o Identification and development of systems to predict emergence of resistance to established and newly identified antibiotics, and to evaluate new therapies for their ability to prevent or overcome resistance. Discovery and evaluation of new potential therapeutics is the major goal of this initiative. It is anticipated that no more than one or two Groups will be supported to pursue drug discovery research against M. tuberculosis as a result of this RFA. Projects or cores that include proposed animal model development must be integrated within the major goal of targeted drug discovery and required to attain the Group's objectives. Funds for evaluation of new agents in animal models may be withheld until compounds generated by the Group are available for animal efficacy studies. It is strongly encouraged that discovery of new mycobactericidal targets and associated therapies with selectivity for these targets be the focus of all applications. Exclusions: Random or large scale screening of compounds will not be supported. Organisms other than M. tuberculosis causing infections associated with AIDS have been excluded from this RFA. Scientists studying opportunistic infections whose research does not lie within the areas defined as responsive to this RFA are strongly encouraged to apply for investigator-initiated grants through the R01, R29, R43 (Small Business Innovative Research Program), Interactive Research Project Grants, or other existing funding mechanisms. No clinical trials will be supported under this RFA. Although studies required for the clinical development of identified potential treatments are beyond the scope of this RFA, development through private venture capital is encouraged. Alternatively, an NCDDG may request that the NIAID assist in certain developmental tasks supported by other mechanisms (NIAID Staff Responsibilities: Nature of NIAID Participation). DEFINITIONS ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT - Administrative efforts that provide support for the overall management of the cooperative agreement and services shared by the Group as a whole. Administrative support for the Group's activities should be included in that of the Principal Investigator's project, and be administered by the Principal Investigator's organization. ARBITRATION PANEL - A panel that may be formed to review any scientific or programmatic activity that is impeding progress within a Group. It will be composed of one Group designee, one NIAID designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area and chosen by the other two. The interaction of this panel is detailed in "Terms of Award". AWARDEE INSTITUTION - The awardee institution establishes and operates the Central Operations Office that funds Group members and is legally and fiscally accountable for the disposition of funds awarded in accordance with PHS policies. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - An assistance mechanism in which substantial NIAID programmatic involvement with the recipient organization during the performance of the planned activity is anticipated. DISCOVERY - The term "discovery" is used explicitly to limit activities of the NCDDG-OI to preclinical identification, design and development of new therapeutic entities. DRUG - In the context of the NCDDG-OI program, the term "drug" is used broadly to encompass new synthetic agents, natural and biological products or novel therapeutic strategies designed to effectively treat tuberculosis. INVENTION - A new drug or innovative treatment that is or may be patentable under Title 35 of the United States Code. NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DRUG DISCOVERY GROUP for the Treatment of Opportunistic Infections (NCDDG-OI) - In this RFA the terms NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DRUG DISCOVERY GROUP, NCDDG-OI, and "Group" are synonymous. Two laboratory research projects representing diverse scientific disciplines and organizations which join together under a single Principal Investigator and which function as a unit with a common goal: the conceptualization, invention, and evaluation of new entities and strategies for the treatment of tuberculosis. All applications must consist of two independent Projects conducted by at least two independent laboratories. For the purpose of this RFA, two projects within a single company or within a single academic department will not be considered independent. This limitation on the number of independent projects from the same academic department or private sector company is intended to increase the diversity and multi-disciplinary expertise available to the Group. An NCDDG-OI Group consists of the following: (1) a Principal Investigator, (2) two research projects, (3) a Scientific Advisors Panel, and (4) an NIAID Scientific Coordinator (see below). NIAID NCDDG-OI PROGRAM DIRECTOR - A Senior Scientist of the NIAID extramural staff who coordinates NIAID's participation in the NCDDG-OI program. NIAID SCIENTIFIC COORDINATOR - A Senior or Associate Scientist of the NIAID extramural staff who functions as a peer with the Principal Investigator and Project Leaders and facilitates the partnership relationship between NIAID and the Group. The Scientific Coordinator will be assigned to each Group by the NCDDG-OI program director. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR - The person who assembles the NCDDG-OI, who is responsible for the performance of the Group as a whole and who submits the single application in response to this RFA. The Principal Investigator will coordinate Group activities scientifically and administratively and should be project leader of one of the Research Projects of the Group. PROJECT LEADER - The leader of one of the scientific research projects of the NCDDG-OI who is directly responsible to the Principal Investigator. Project Leaders will not be supported by more than one Cooperative Agreement awarded under this RFA unless the research is clearly and separately delineated in each application. Individuals currently supported under an existing NCDDG-OI or other programs may be funded under this RFA provided there is no scientific or budgetary overlap in funded activities. RESEARCH PROJECT - A discrete, specified project with a separate budget that relates to the overall theme and objectives of the NCDDG-OI. A maximum of two research projects per Group is stipulated. SCIENTIFIC ADVISORS PANEL - A panel, comprised of two to three peers from the scientific community, whose mission is to provide the Principal Investigator with comprehensive review of the Group's activities and progress, consult on future goals and strategies, and recommend alternative directions, as appropriate. Selection and appointment of the Panel is the responsibility of the Principal Investigator. Members of the Panel will not be affiliated with any of the institutions comprising the Group. A Scientific Advisors Panel is required of all Groups. The composition of the designated Panel will be provided to the NIAID within the first year of funding. The Panel will provide the Principal Investigator and the NIAID Scientific Coordinator with a comprehensive written review of the Group's activity during the second and third years of funding. Reviews will encompass timeliness of progress in individual projects relative to original projections; progress relative to the Group's objectives and needs; continued relevance of a given project to the Group's function; continued coordination of the Group's objectives with the objectives of the NCDDG-OI program; and recommendations for new directions, as appropriate. The Principal Investigator will invite the Scientific Coordinator to all meetings of the Panel, which may be combined with Group meetings. SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT CORE COMPONENT - Facilities for equipment and services which are shared by two projects of the NCDDG-OI may be provided for within a Research Project. Examples of Scientific Support Core components are: biochemical assays, in vitro or animal model testing, production of monoclonal antibodies, scale-up synthesis of drugs. The core can be defined as a component with established techniques and assays which perform a service function resulting in an economy of effort and savings in the overall costs of the NCDDG-OI. The core unit is to be described in the research plan of the projects and in adequate detail to enable the evaluation of its scientific and technical merit. A CORE COMPONENT cannot be considered toward fulfilling the required two research projects per Group. (See details for preparation of the budgets under XI. APPLICATION PROCEDURES). SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Terms and Conditions of Award NOTE: Failure to abide by any of the Terms of Award pertaining to awardee responsibilities stipulated in this Section may result in the withholding of funds by the NIAID until compliance with the Terms is restored. A. Working Relationships Within a Cooperative Agreement Under the Cooperative Agreement, a negotiated partner relationship exists between the recipient of the award and NIAID in which the Group is responsive to the requirements and conditions set forth in this RFA. The participation of the Government through the NIAID extramural staff is intended to facilitate a concerted effort by all members of the network of Groups by providing appropriate scientific input, by coordinating efforts among Groups, by making available to Groups biological materials for testing, by accessing appropriate data bases, and by providing ancillary testing and other resources, such as reagents, samples or experimental animals, available under existing Government contracts. The interaction of academic and non-profit research institutions with commercial organizations and Government is strongly encouraged and is expected to favor expeditious preclinical discovery and development of new drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis. B. Patent coverage Since the discovery of agents active against tuberculosis is the objective of this effort, and since active involvement by industrial laboratories is facilitated by the existence of adequate patent coverage, it is essential that applicants provide plans to assure such coverage. With the potential for involvement of multiple institutions, the patent situation could be complicated. Each applicant Group must, therefore, provide a detailed description of the approach to be used for obtaining patent coverage and for licensing where appropriate, in particular where the invention may involve investigators from more than one institution. In addition each Group must provide a detailed description of the procedures to be followed for the resolution of legal problems that may develop. Attention is drawn to the reporting requirements of 35 U.S.C. Parts 200-212 and 37 CFR Part 401 or FAR 55.227-11. Instructions were also published in the NIH GUIDE FOR GRANTS AND CONTRACTS, Vol. 19, No. 23, June 22, 1990. Note that non-profit organizations (including universities) and small business firms retain the rights to any patent resulting from Government contracts, grants or Cooperative Agreements. Also, a Presidential memorandum of February 18, 1983 extended to all business concerns, regardless of size, the first option to the ownership of rights to inventions as provided in P.L. 96-517. As a result of this memorandum, the relationships among industrial organizations and other participants are simplified, since all Group members can now be full partners in the research and in any inventions resulting therefrom. The specific patenting arrangements among the institutions may vary, and could include joint patent ownership, exclusive licensing arrangements, etc. Applicants are encouraged to develop an arrangement that is most suitable for their own particular circumstances. Federal regulation clause 37CFR401 and HHS Inventions regulations at 45 CFR Parts 6 and 8 require that NIH be informed of inventions and licensing occurring under NIH funded research. Invention and licensing reports must be submitted to Extramural Invention Reports Office, Office of Extramural Research, Building 31, Room 5B41, NIH. C. Awardee Rights and Responsibilities and Nature of NIAID Participation It is the primary responsibility of the Principal Investigator to clearly define the objectives and approaches of the Group, to plan and conduct the research stipulated in the proposal, and to ensure that the results obtained are analyzed and published in a timely manner. The data obtained will be the property of the awardee. Meetings a. Two mandatory Group meetings are required per year. The Principal Investigator and Project and Core Leaders will meet to review progress, plan and design research activities, and establish priorities within the Group. The Principal Investigator will be responsible for scheduling the time and place (generally at one of the performance sites), for notifying the Scientific Coordinator at least thirty days prior to the meeting date, and for preparing concise (2-3 pages) minutes or summaries of the Group meetings which will be delivered to the members of the Group including the Scientific Coordinator within thirty days following the meeting. NIAID Scientific Coordinator will participate but not chair Group meetings. b. One mandatory meeting of the entire NCDDG-OI program will be held each year at a site designated by NIAID (Bethesda, Maryland is anticipated) during which all Principal Investigators and Project Leaders will present significant findings in symposium format. Data presented at this meeting are selected by the individual presenters in consultation with their Principal Investigator thus affording appropriate protection of proprietary or commercially sensitive information. c. Group communications. A critical determinant of Group success will be the degree of communication among members. Therefore, in addition to the three meetings listed above, additional meetings for coordination of Group activities may be necessary. Regular telephone and written communication will be important and are encouraged. d. Groups will designate a Scientific Advisors Panel within the first year of funding. The Principal Investigator will convene a meeting, or meetings, of the Group with the Panel during the second and third years which may be in conjunction with the required Group meetings (see item 1, above). The Panel will meet with the Group, and advise the Principal Investigator on the Group's progress, future goals, strategies and new directions, as appropriate. The Panel will provide the Principal Investigator with a comprehensive written review (2 to 3 pages) of the Group's activity each year. Members of the Panel will not be affiliated with any of the institutions comprising the Group. Publications The Principal Investigator will be responsible for the timely submission to the Scientific Coordinator of all abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews (co)authored by members of the Group and supported in part or in total under this Agreement. The Principal Investigator and Project Leader are requested to submit manuscripts to the Scientific Coordinator within three weeks of acceptance for publication so that an up-to-date summary of program accomplishments can be maintained. Publications or oral presentations of work done under this Agreement are the responsibility of the Principal Investigator and appropriate Project Leader. All publications (abstracts, peer reviewed manuscripts, reviews) and oral presentations of work supported in part or in total by the NCDDG-OI cooperative agreement must be acknowledged as part of the presentation and will include the mechanism, cooperative agreement number and Institute; for example, "This work was supported in whole (or in part) by the NCDDG-OI program, cooperative agreement number U01-AI-12345, NIAID." Progress Reports An annual Progress Report will be submitted with the Application for Continuation Grant which must include significant experimental data obtained and a complete and cumulative list of all publications (abstracts, manuscripts, reviews) (co)authored by Group members and supported in part or in total under this Agreement. Each Progress Report should also include a brief section outlining intra-Group interactions which have augmented activities, citing specific occurrences (e.g., compound X was synthesized under Project 1 and transferred to Project 2 for bioassays). Inter-Group collaboration with other NCDDG-OIs should be specified, where applicable. Interaction with the Scientific Coordinator and the NIAID during the reporting period should be described. The Progress Report must also include basic information as instructed with PHS 2590 Noncompeting Continuation Application forms. Rights to Data Although the NIAID Scientific Coordinator has a right of access to the data (see NIAID staff responsibilities below), the applicant will retain custody of and rights to the data. Information obtained from the data may be used by the Scientific Coordinator for the preparation of internal reports on the Group's activities. Timely publication of major findings is strongly encouraged. The NIAID Scientific Coordinator may assist the Groups by providing them with compounds for voluntary initial and confirmatory testing. In testing compounds supplied by the NIAID, the Groups agree to abide by any confidentiality agreement between the NIAID and a third party who may have supplied the compounds for testing through NIAID. The applicant institution and the Principal Investigator will be responsible for the Group's application. The award will be made to the applicant institution on behalf of the Group as a whole and not to individual research projects within the Group. The applicant institution will provide a Central Operations Office for the Group, will be responsible for the performance of the entire Group, and will be accountable for the funds awarded. D. NIAID Staff Responsibilities: Nature of NIAID Participation Assistance via a Cooperative Agreement differs from the traditional research grant in that, in addition to the normal programmatic and administrative stewardship responsibilities, the awarding component (NIAID) anticipates substantial programmatic involvement during performance of the research program. NIAID shall participate as a member of the Group and shall be represented by a Scientific Coordinator or the NCDDG-OI program director. The Coordinator shall be selected from the Developmental Therapeutics Branch of the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, or from the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, which are extramural programs of the NIAID. During performance of the award, the NIAID Scientific Coordinator, may provide appropriate assistance, advice, and guidance by: participating in the design of Group activities; advising in the selection of sources or resources; coordinating or participating in collection and/or analysis of data; advising in management and technical performance; or participating in the preparation of publications. However, the role of NIAID will be to facilitate and not to direct the activities. It is anticipated that decisions in all activities will be reached by consensus of the Group and that NIAID staff will be given the opportunity to offer input to this process. The manner of reaching this consensus and the final decision-making authority will rest with the Principal Investigator. o NIAID Participation in Design of Group Activities, Development of Research Protocols and Evaluation of Results a. The NIAID Scientific Coordinator, like other Group members, may suggest studies within the scope of the Group's objectives and research activities; may present to the Group experimental findings from published sources or from contract projects in support of these suggestions; may participate in the design, but not in the execution, of experiments agreed to by the Group; and may participate in the analysis of results. b. The NIAID Scientific Coordinator may assist the Group or other individual members in research planning, particularly by: o providing needed resources and information that may not be otherwise be available to the Group; o providing data from testing conducted in resource contract laboratories; o providing information concerning work being conducted in other NIAID-supported extramural projects, in order to reduce or prevent duplication of efforts. c. The Scientific Coordinator may serve as a resource for information, laboratory testing, and biological supplies, when such resources are not a normal requirement of the Group's day-to-day research activities but may be required on an occasional basis. The NIAID has a contract program for the preclinical development of compounds for the treatment of AIDS-associated opportunistic infections, including animal models. These resources are intended for initial studies and may not be available on a continual basis. Examples of potential assistance include: reference compounds for standardization of test systems, facilitation of confirmatory testing at research sites including other NCDDG-OI Groups, limited testing in appropriate animal model(s), focused searches of NIAID's computer files of chemical structures and biological activity, chemical re-synthesis, analysis, formulation, and toxicology testing through existing pre-clinical development contracts (contingent upon NIAID's recommendation and prioritization), and networking with other NIH staff, NCDDGs, other collaborators and other Government and non-Government researchers who may provide guidance, expertise or resources to facilitate development of therapies identified by the Group. In addition, the NIAID supports Phase I, Phase II and Phase III clinical trials through a variety of mechanisms. These clinical development resources are available to study promising therapies brought forward from sources such as the NCDDG-OI program. It is understood that the Government provides its consulting and testing services in the interest of promoting experimental anti-infective agents through preclinical and clinical testing and development in the most expeditious fashion, and that newly marketed agents that have utilized this service will be offered to the public at a reasonable cost. NIAID Participation in Collection and Analysis of Data, Procedures for Submission of Results to NIAID, and Preparation of Group Findings for Presentation and Publication In addition to the special reports and stipulations described below, reporting requirements will be identical to those currently in existence for awardees of traditional NIH research project grants. a. The principal end product of NCDDG-OI activities will be the discovery of new entities and strategies for development to clinical trials for AIDS-associated OIs including tuberculosis. Subsequent developmental work through private resources is encouraged. Alternatively, the Group may recommend that development be sponsored by NIAID (see below). In the latter case, it will be necessary for the Principal Investigator, appropriate Project Leaders and NIAID Scientific Coordinator to collaborate in the analysis, summarization, preparation, and presentation of data to the appropriate NIAID staff and its advisory committees. b. NIAID will retain the option to cross-file or independently file an application for investigational clinical trial; e.g., an Investigational New Drug (IND) application to the United States Food and Drug Administration of any invention resulting from these NIAID supported Cooperative Agreements. Reports of data generated by the Group or any of its members required for inclusion in INDs and Clinical Brochures and for cross-filing purposes will be submitted by the Principal Investigator to the Scientific Coordinator upon request. Such reports will be in final draft form and include background information, methods, results, and conclusions. They will be subject to approval and revision by NIAID and may be augmented with test results from other Government sponsored projects prior to submission to the appropriate regulatory agency. E. Arbitration Process Inasmuch as certain activities under VIII. Special Requirements: Terms and Conditions of Award require approval by NIAID staff during performance of this Cooperative Agreement, specifically, reports intended for inclusion in INDs and Clinical Brochures, change in Principal Investigator or Project Leader, redistribution of biological materials received through the Scientific Coordinator and dissemination of research findings resulting from the use of these materials, NIAID will establish an arbitration process to resolve any differences of opinion with regard to scientific-programmatic matters. An arbitration panel, composed of one Group designee, one NIAID designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area and chosen by the other two, will be formed to review any disagreements regarding scientific-programmatic issues that are restricting progress. This arbitration process in no way affects the right of an award recipient to appeal selected post award administrative decisions in accordance with HHS, PHS, and NIH regulations. These special arbitration procedures for scientific-programmatic matters in no way affect the awardee's right to appeal an adverse action in accordance with PHS regulations at 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D, and HHS regulations at 45 CFR Part 16. These special Terms and Conditions of Award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS Grant Administration Regulations at 45 CFR Part 74, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policy statements. STUDY POPULATIONS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF NIH POLICIES CONCERNING INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY POPULATIONS NIH policy is that applicants for NIH clinical research grants and cooperative agreements are required to include minorities and women in study populations so that research findings can be of benefit to all persons at risk of the disease, disorder or condition under study; special emphasis should be placed on the need for inclusion of minorities and women in studies of diseases, disorders and conditions which disproportionately affect them. This policy is intended to apply to males and females of all ages. If women or minorities are excluded or inadequately represented in clinical research, particularly in proposed population-based studies, a clear compelling rationale should be provided. The composition of the proposed study population must be described in terms of gender and racial/ethnic group. In addition, gender and racial/ethnic issues must be addressed in developing a research design and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the study. This information must be included in the form PHS 398 in Section 1-4 of the Research Plan AND summarized in Section 5, Human Subjects. Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of including the broadest possible representation of minority groups. However, NIH recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in all research projects to include representation of the full array of United States racial/ethnic minority populations (i.e., native Americans [including American Indians or Alaskan Natives], Asian/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics). The rationale for studies on single minority populations groups should be provided. For the purpose of this policy, clinical research is defined as human biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention (and preventive strategies), diagnosis, or treatment of diseases, disorders or conditions, including, but not limited to, clinical studies. The usual NIH policies concerning research on human subjects also apply. Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues cannot be identified or linked to individuals are excluded. However, every effort should be made to include human tissues from women and racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to apply the results of the study broadly, and this should be addressed by applicants. For foreign awards, the policy on inclusion of women applies fully; since the definition of minority differs in other countries, the applicant must discuss the relevance of research involving foreign population groups to the United States' populations, including minorities. If the required information is not contained within the application, the application will be returned. Peer reviewers will address specifically whether the research plan in the application conforms to these policies. If the representation of women or minorities in the study design is inadequate to answer the scientific question(s) addressed AND the justification for the selected study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific weakness or deficiency in the study design and will be reflected in assigning the priority score to the application. All applications for clinical research submitted to NIH are required to address these policies. NIH funding components will not award grants or cooperative agreements that do not comply with these policies. Applicants from institutions that have a General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources may wish to identify the GCRC as a resource for conducting the proposed research. If so, a letter of agreement from either the GCRC program director or Principal Investigator could be included with the application. LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by November 15, 1993, a letter of intent that includes a descriptive title of the overall proposed research, the name, address, telephone number, and institution of the Principal Investigator, descriptive title, name of prospective project leaders and other key investigators, and the institution for each component research project, and the number and title of this RFA in response to which the application may be submitted. Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of applications, the information that it contains is helpful in planning for the review of applications. It allows NIAID staff to estimate the potential workload of the reviewers and to avoid possible conflict of interest in the review. The letter of intent is to be sent to Dr. Dianne Tingley at the address listed under INQUIRIES. APPLICATION PROCEDURES Special Instructions for Preparing Applications These instructions for preparing the NCDDG-OI application supplement the instructions found in form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91), which is available as an application kit at most grantee institutions and from the Division of Research Grants, Office of Grants Information, National Institutes of Health 5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone 301-710-0267. Additional instructions are required because the form PHS 398 is designed primarily for individual research grant (R01) applications, whereas the Group application consists of research projects interrelated by a common theme. Items that require modification for U01 applications, in addition to other information not requested in form PHS 398, are detailed below: A. Introductory Section Face Page of Form PHS 398 Complete items 1 through 18 as instructed. Please note that this should be Page 1 of the entire application; all succeeding pages should be numbered consecutively. To ensure the identification of your application with this RFA, the application form must have "National Cooperative Drug Discovery Group for Treatment of Opportunistic Infections (NCDDG-OI) RFA AI-93-019" typed on item 2a of the face page of the application form and the YES box must be marked. o Overall Description. Use Page 2 of Form PHS 398 Provide a succinct but accurate description of the OVERALL goals of the NCDDG-OI, addressing the major, common theme of the Group. Do not exceed space provided. Under "Key Personnel Engaged on Project," list the Principal Investigator of the overall NCDDG-OI, followed by the Project Leaders of the component research projects and cores and then the other key personnel. o Table of Contents. Use Page 3 of Form PHS 398 The NCDDG-OI application should be assembled and paginated as one complete application. Bearing in mind that the application will be scientifically reviewed project by project, prepare a detailed table of contents that will enable reviewers to readily locate specific information pertinent to the overall U01 application as well as to each component research project and core. A page reference should be included for each summary budget (overall) as well as the budget for each project. Further, each project should be identified by number, title and responsible Project Leader. Page locations of summary tables following suggested formats shown in Tables I-IV of this document (APPENDIX) should be indicated in the Table of Contents. o Composite Budget To aid in peer review, applicants are requested to prepare a Composite Budget for the first twelve month budget period using a format such as that shown in Table I of this RFA. Do not use page 4 of form PHS 398 for this purpose. Detailed justification for budget elements should not be presented here, but in the individual budget of the projects and cores. Summary budgets should be prepared for the total Group application. The maximum dollar request permitted under this RFA is $0.8 million total costs (direct and indirect) during the first year, and $3.4 million over the four year period. o Summary Budget by Category. Use page 5 from the Form PHS 398 Prepare a Summary Budget by category for ALL YEARS of the requested support. o Personnel Listing and Distribution of Effort for "Other Support" Applicants are requested to list all professional and non-professional participants in the Group, including those with no salary requested, for the first year of requested support using a format such as that shown in Table II. Using a format such as Table III, a similiar distribution of professional effort (%) for other support would be helpful for peer review. o Research Plan a. Program Introduction - Statement of Group Objectives The NCDDG-OI should be viewed as a program of interrelated research projects -- each capable of standing on its own scientific merit, but complementary to one another. It is very important to establish the programmatic theme in the first few sentences describing the collaboration. The introduction is an important section, for it provides the investigator an opportunity to give conceptual wholeness to the overall program by giving a statement of the general problem area and by laying out a broad strategy for attacking the problems. The introductory section should briefly state the rationale of the research proposed in each project describing how it relates to drug discovery and the anticipated approach to achieve the work proposed. It is essential to demonstrate that each component research project contributes to the attainment of the Group's objectives and that each has available the professional and technical personnel to permit efficient and successful conduct of the proposed research; i.e., it is important to show that the total personnel of the Group are sufficient in quality, number, and committed time and effort to assure successful conduct of the proposed research. Therefore, the first section of the NCDDG-OI application should contain: o A clear, concise plan in narrative and diagrammatic form that depicts the interrelationships among the members of the NCDDG-OI and the contribution of each to fulfillment of Group objectives. o An organizational chart of the NCDDG-OI showing the name, organization, and scientific discipline of the investigators comprising the Group. o A plan to ensure maintenance of close collaboration and effective communication among members of the Group in accord with Section VIII, Special Requirements. The application should include plans for scheduling Group meetings, notifying Group members, including the NIAID Scientific Coordinator, and documenting and disseminating Group meeting proceedings. o Letters of commitment to the overall plan and acceptance of the participation of the NIAID Scientific Coordinator. o A rationale for the drug discovery approach(es) proposed and discussion of the therapeutic approaches which may derive from the research projects. o The anticipated unique advantages to be expected from the Group operating within the proposed collaborative efforts; how the projects are mutually reinforcing; and how collectively they will further the stated goals of the proposed research. b. Organizational and Administrative Structure of the NCDDG-OI Describe in detail and by diagram the chain of responsibility for decision-making and administration beginning at the level of Principal Investigator and including the different research Project Leaders and other investigators. Indicate where in the chain of responsibility advisory groups will be used. Describe their role in establishing quality control of the research efforts. c. Consortium Arrangements An application that includes research activity involving institutions other than the sponsoring organization is considered a consortium effort. It is imperative that care be taken in preparing any consortium application so that the programmatic, fiscal, and administrative considerations are fully explained. The policy governing consortia is described in the NIH GUIDE FOR GRANTS AND CONTRACTS (Vol. 14, No. 7, June 21, 1985), which should be available at the sponsoring institution's business office, or in the Office of Grants Inquiries' publication entitled, "Guidelines for Establishing and Operating Consortium Grants," January 1989, which may be obtained by calling 301-710-0267. These guidelines should be read carefully before an application is developed. If clarification of the guidelines is needed, the applicant is encouraged to contact grants management staff, Ms. Jane Unsworth, at 301-496-7075. d. Patent Coverage Provide a description of the Group's plan for assuring adequate patent coverage of new inventions that may issue as a result of Government funding of this U01. NOTE: A formal statement of Patent Agreement among all Group members and their institutions as well as a detailed description of procedures to be followed for the resolution of legal problems which may develop, signed and dated by the organizational official authorized to enter into patent arrangements for each Group member and member institution, is to be submitted to Dr. Barbara Laughon in advance of the application receipt date (for Dr. Laughon's complete address see INQUIRIES, below.) Should the Group wish to place all inventions and discoveries resulting from these studies within the public domain, a letter to that effect must be submitted to Dr. Laughon in lieu of the patent agreement prior to submission of the application. The letter must be co-signed by the Principal Investigator, Project Leaders, and each of the business officials representing the respective institutions. B. Individual Research Projects The strength of the application will be judged mainly on the basis of the quality of each research project. Therefore, the reviewers will expect each project to be described in the same detail as for a regular research grant application, to enable them to judge the scientific merit solely on the basis of the written applications. The portion of the application for each component research project should be prepared in the same manner as an R01 application, following carefully the instructions found in the grant application kit form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91). A few modifications are pointed out below for selected items, to address the interactive, collaborative contributions of the individual project. Face Page of Form PHS 398. Complete a Face Page of form PHS 398 for each project. Page 2 of form PHS 398. Provide an abstract of the research proposed in the project. Prepare the abstract according to the instructions provided on page 2 of form PHS 398. In addition, the abstract should contain a brief description of how the research project will contribute towards attainment of the Group's objectives. Under "Personnel Engaged on Project", follow instructions on page 2 of PHS 398, listing all individuals participating in the project, beginning with the Project Leader. Page 3 of Form PHS 398. Prepare a Table of Contents for the research project using page 3 of form PHS 398. Pages 4 and 5 of Form PHS 398. Detailed first year budget and budget for entire project period: follow instructions on pages 16-19 of the form PHS 398 instructions. The budget pages should have the project number and the project leader's name in the upper left hand of each budget page. Funds for attending the Group meetings and the annual NCDDG-OI program meeting (section VIII.C.1) should be included in the budget. Funds to cover operating costs of the NCDDG-OI program annual meeting may be contributed by one or more Groups. NIAID will provide administrative supplements for this purpose, as needed. Funds to cover expenses incurred by the Scientific Advisors Panel should be included in the Principal Investigator's component of the application. Pages 6 - 7 of Form PHS 398. Provide the biographical sketches and information on "Other Support" of all participating investigators in the Project. FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY. If a similar R01 or R29 is submitted concurrently or is pending, it should be so stated in this section. Incomplete, inaccurate or ambiguous information about OTHER SUPPORT, whether active or pending, may lead to delays in the review of the application. Research Plan: Follow the instructions indicated in IV. C., pages 19 through 22 of the form PHS 398 Instructions, completing items 1 through 4 in detail. In addition, attention should be given to integration of the component project into the overall Group project. As with a regular research grant application, the overall research plan for each project should not exceed 25 pages (from Specific Aims through Research Design and Methods). The following points should be addressed in the appropriate sections. Item 1 - Specific Aims: In addition to listing the specific objectives for the total period of requested support for the component, state the overall objective or long-term goal of the research and its relationship to the goals of the NCDDG-OI and how it relates to other projects or cores in the Group. Item 2 - Significance: In addition to the overall biological significance of the proposed research, this section should indicate the relevance of the project to the drug discovery efforts of the Group. Item 7 - Collaborative Arrangements: This item should include a brief statement of the collaborative contribution that this project will make towards the achievement of the Group's objectives, and with which component projects it will actively interact. Collaborative arrangements anticipated, either internal or external to the Group should be described and documents with letters from collaborating investigators. C. Scientific Core Support Scientific core support units, if required, must be included as subprojects within the budgets of one of the Projects. Core support may be provided as consortia if performed at institutions different from that of the Principal Investigator (see Consortium Arrangements, above.) Describe the role and importance of the core as a resource to the NCDDG-OI as a whole. Indicate the specific service(s) such core support will provide and the projects it will serve, e.g., production of monoclonal antibodies and distribution to research projects 1 and 2. This section should present a clear description of the facilities, techniques, and professional skills that the core will provide. The role of the core leader and each of the key participants should be described. The portion of the application describing each scientific core should be prepared with the same level of detail as an R01 application in order for the technical merit and appropriateness of each core to be evaluated. A summary table following the format suggested in Table IV (Appendix) should be submitted listing any cores and showing the apportionment of core resources between the research projects. In the event that any core support subproject is located at an institution other than that of the project it supports, the following form PHS 398 pages should be used and the instructions for preparing a consortium budget should be followed: Face Page Form PHS 398. Complete the form and enter a descriptive name of the requested core (e.g., Administrative Core, Monoclonal Antibody Production Core) in item 1, Title of Project. Pages 4 and 5 of Form PHS 398: Complete the budget pages providing justifications with the same detail as in research projects. The budget for core units should be presented according to the instructions indicated on pages 16-19 of the form PHS 398 Instructions. A detailed budget is required for the first year (form PHS 398, page 4) and a budget summary for all additional years (form PHS 398, page 5). Explicit detailed budget justifications for all years should be included. Pages 6 - 8 of form PHS 398. Provide the biographical sketches and information on "Other Support" of all participating investigators in the Core. FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY. Incomplete, inaccurate or ambiguous information about OTHER SUPPORT, whether active or pending, may lead to delays in the review of the application. Include information required to describe Resources and Environment available to the Core as well as appropriate sections pertaining to vertebrate animals. D. General Instructions The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) is to be used in applying for cooperative agreements. These forms are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research, and from the Office of Grants Information, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, 5333 Westbard Avenue, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone (301) 710-0267. The RFA label available in form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the original signed application. Failure to use this label could result in delayed processing of the application such that it may not reach the committee in time for review. Applications that are not received as a single package from the Principal Investigator and that do not conform to the instructions contained in PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) applications kit will be judged non-responsive and will be returned to the applicant. The applicant may include additional detailed information in an appendix, but this should be limited only to information essential to the application. Item D of form PHS 398: "Specific Instructions, Appendix" should be carefully followed in preparing appendix material. Applicants are advised to place data or information crucial to the research plan within the application itself and not in the appendix; failure to abide by this requirement may result in an inadequate review. All appended material must be clearly labelled and cross-referenced to indicate the specific project to which it applies. Prepare five sets of the appendix, including only relevant reprints, making sure that the reprints are cross-referenced to specific projects as well. Submit a signed, original of the application, including the Checklist, and three signed, single-sided photocopies, in one package to: Division of Research Grants National Institutes of Health Westwood Building, Room 240 Bethesda, MD 20892** At the same time as the submission to DRG, send two additional exact copies of the application with the five sets of appendices, in a separate package, directly to: Dianne Tingley, Ph.D. Division of AIDS National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 4C16 6003 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-0818 Applications must be received by January 21, 1994. Applications received after that date will be returned without review. The Division of Research Grants (DRG) will not accept an application in response to this RFA which is essentially the same as one pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. DRG will not accept an application which is essentially the same as one already reviewed. Simultaneous submission of identical applications will not be allowed, nor will essentially identical applications to be reviewed by different review committees. This restriction is superseded by an NIH policy permitting concurrent submission of a duplicate R01 and a component of a multi-project application. The NIH policy however, further stipulates that should both the R01 and the multi-project application be considered for funding, the R01 will be relinquished in favor of the multi-project application. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Applications will be reviewed by the Division of Research Grants for completeness and by NIAID staff to determine administrative and programmatic responsiveness to this RFA; those judged to be non-responsive will be returned to the applicant without review. Applications with budgets in excess of $800,000 total (direct and indirect) first year costs will be returned without review. Those applications that are complete and responsive may be subjected to triage by an NIAID peer review group before or during the scientific review, to determine their scientific merit relative to the other applications received in response to this RFA. The NIAID will remove from further competition those applications judged to be noncompetitive for award and will notify the applicant (Principal Investigator) and responsible institutional official. Those applications that are complete and responsive will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria stated below for scientific/technical merit by an appropriate review committee convened by the NIAID. In the event of multiple, highly qualified applications, final funding recommendations will be based on highest Program priorities. The second level of review will be provided by the National Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council. Review Criteria The application must be directed towards the attainment of the stated programmatic goals (see Research Objectives). The following factors are the criteria used by peer review groups in the scientific and technical review of applications for drug discovery: o The scientific and technical merit of the program as a whole, as well as that of each individual research project and core components, for realization of drug discovery objectives; the scientific and technical significance of the overall program goals; the development of a well-defined central research focus; and originality and uniqueness of proposed research. Each project must be supportable on its own merit. o Relevance of the Group's objectives to the discovery of new entities and strategies for the treatment of tuberculosis and the likelihood that new potential therapies will be identified during the course of the proposed study. Priority will be given to proposed therapies with potential for combatting multidrug resistant tuberculosis, improving prophylaxis approaches, practicality of administration to HIV-infected people, and low toxicity. o Specific competencies of the Principal Investigator and Project Leaders to conduct the proposed work: documented research experience, commitment, and time availability of Principal Investigator, Project Leaders, and other key personnel. While there is no mandatory percent effort set, it is anticipated that, due to the complexity and time required to maintain a well-coordinated and productive research effort, a minimum 20 percent effort by the Principal Investigator and each Project Leader may be important to the success of the Group. o Documented research experience and accomplishments of investigators in the research areas outlined in the RFA; accomplishments of the Group to date (for competitive supplement applications). o Technical merit of proposed methods for producing and evaluating test materials, and technical sufficiency of methods for evaluation of new discoveries, test systems, models, etc. o Administrative experience and competence of Principal Investigator in the development, implementation, and management of comprehensive research programs; and plans for effective intra-Group communication and for assuring Group cohesiveness within each project and within the Group as a whole. o Adequacy of existing physical facilities and resources of the Principal Investigator and Project Leaders, including biohazard containment facilities. o Documented commitment of institutions represented by Group members; documented capability of Principal Investigator's institution to serve as Central Operations Office for the Group. The initial review group may make recommendations regarding appropriateness of applicants' specific aims to programmatic goals, deletion of projects or cores not essential to drug discovery, administrative oversight by program staff, and disaggregation of outstanding projects for consideration as individual research grants. The initial review group will review each project and core within the application individually, followed by scoring of the application as a whole. AWARD CRITERIA The primary criterion for award is the scientific and technical merit of the application as judged by peer reviewers and reflected in the priority score. Additional award criteria are the availability of funds, receipt of a sufficient number of scientifically meritorious applications that are responsive to this RFA, and overall programmatic relevance and priority. INQUIRIES The opportunity to clarify issues or questions about the RFA from potential applicants is welcome. Direct inquiries regarding the RFA and programmatic issues should be sent to: Barbara Laughon, Ph.D. Division of AIDS National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 2C35 6003 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 402-2304 FAX: (301) 402-3211 Inquiries pertaining to review of applications may be directed to: Dianne Tingley, Ph.D. Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 4C16 6003 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-0818 FAX: (301) 402-2638 Inquiries regarding fiscal matters may be directed to: Ms. Jane Unsworth Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 4B22 6003 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-7075 FAX: (301) 480-3780 Schedule Letter of Intent Receipt Date: November 15, 1993 Application Receipt Date: January 21, 1994 Scientific Review Date: March 1994 Advisory Council Date: June 1994 Award Date: July/August 1994 AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, 93.856 - Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research and 93.855 - Immunology, Allergic and Immunologic Diseases Research. Awards are made under the authority of the Public Health Service Act, Title IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42 USC 241 and 285) and administered under PHS grant policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency Review. .
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||||