Full Text AI-93-012 IMMUNE RECONSTITUTION OF HIV-INFECTED INDIVIDUALS (IRPG) NIH GUIDE, Volume 22, Number 28, August 6, 1993 RFA: AI-93-012 P.T. 34 Keywords: AIDS Immunology Immune System Antivirals Gene Therapy+ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Letter of Intent Receipt Date: October 27, 1993 Application Receipt Date: December 8, 1993 PURPOSE The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) invite Interactive Research Project Grant (IRPG) applications for collaborative research efforts that combine immune reconstitution and gene-based strategies to develop new treatment modalities for HIV-1 infection. The NIAID and NIDDK wish to promote research on: interactions of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) with the immune system that may impact on the immunologic reconstitution of infected individuals; cytokines to facilitate stem cell reconstitution of HIV-infected individuals or ameliorate/reverse HIV-related damage to the immune system; and gene-based strategies to counteract detrimental effects of HIV-1 on the immune system, to prevent infection of stem cells transplanted into HIV-infected individuals, and to improve the characteristics of ex vivo expanded lymphocytes to enable them to function more effectively in vivo. Although clinical trials will not be supported under this Request for Applications (RFA), the basic and preclinical research accomplished is expected to lay the foundation for future clinical trials. The NIAID and NIDDK request the coordinated submission of related individual research project grant applications from investigators who wish to collaborate on research, but do not require extensive shared physical resources. These applications must share a common theme and describe the objectives and scientific importance of the interchange of ideas, data, and materials among the collaborating investigators. This collaborative research will be supported by investigator-initiated Interactive Research Project Grant (IRPG) awards. For further information, potential applicants should refer to the document, Special Instructions for Preparing Applications for Interactive Research Project Grants. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a PHS-led national activity for setting priority areas. This RFA, Immune Reconstitution of HIV-Infected Individuals, is related to the priority area of HIV infection. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report: Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (telephone 202-783-3238). ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign, for-profit and non-profit organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges, hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and eligible agencies of the Federal government. Applications from minority individuals and women are encouraged. Applicants for IRPGs may not concurrently submit additional R01 applications (either investigator-initiated or in response to another RFA) that represent significant duplications of the efforts described in the IRPG application. Concurrent submission of program project (P01) or cooperative agreement (U01) applications that request support for essentially similar work is also prohibited. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT The support mechanism for this RFA will be the individual research project grant (R01) from investigators who wish to collaborate on research efforts directed at the development of treatment strategies utilizing immune reconstitution. The independent research projects will be organized into an IRPG that must consist of a minimum of two independent R01 applications. For this RFA, each IRPG group submission should include at least one application proposing research on stem cell or somatic cell therapies and one application proposing gene-based therapeutic strategies. Each application must clearly identify the research that will be carried out independently and that which will be carried out collaboratively and include a succinct description of the scientific relationships among the investigators and plans for collaboration, interaction, and communication. Refer to the document, Special Instructions for the Preparation of Applications for Interactive Research Project Grants. An IRPG Coordinator should be identified from among the participating R01 Principal Investigators. Since the Coordinator will be responsible for facilitating communication and collaboration among the investigators, he/she may request a modest amount of funds for an administrative core to support the time and effort contributed to these activities. See additional instructions on preparation of a IRPG application. All applicable PHS and NIH grants policies will apply to applications received in response to this RFA. Because the nature and scope of the research proposed in response to this RFA may vary, it is anticipated that the size of the awards will vary also. The budget request for the initial year's total costs (direct and indirect) for the R01 applications in the IRPG group may not exceed an average of $250,000 per R01 application. (For example, one application that requests $350,000 might be combined with two applications requesting $200,000.) Any budgets in excess of this amount must be approved by the NIAID prior to submission of the IRPG application. Requests for expensive equipment are not encouraged. Up to four years of support may be requested. Reissuance of this RFA is anticipated but not certain. If by the end of the third year, the NIAID has not announced its intent to re-advertise this RFA, incumbents should prepare unsolicited competing continuation R01 or IRPG applications that will compete with all investigator-initiated applications and will be reviewed by traditional peer review procedures. Those Principal Investigators who wish to continue collaborative efforts should consult NIAID staff before preparing their applications. FUNDS AVAILABLE The NIAID and NIDDK anticipate awarding two to four IRPGs (a total of six to eight R01 awards), for a total cost of $1.9 million for the initial year of funding. The NIAID has set aside $1.2 million for applications received in response to this RFA, and the NIDDK has set aside $0.7 million for this purpose. These funding levels are dependent on the receipt of a sufficient number of applications of high scientific merit. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background The mortality and morbidity suffered by HIV-infected individuals is primarily the consequence of immune deficits that become increasingly more severe during the course of the disease. Several immune-based strategies are presently under evaluation for ameliorating and/or reversing immune deficiencies in HIV-infected individuals. Prominent among these are the use of HIV envelope vaccines or therapeutics (e.g., interleukin-2) to augment existing responses to the virus or enhance the immune system as a whole; HIV-specific lymphocytes or antibodies to supplement the response elicited during the natural course of infection; and bone marrow transplantation (BMT) to restore immune cells lost as a result of HIV-1 infection. BMT is currently being used to restore marrow function in cancer patients whose hematopoietic systems have been ablated by chemo- and radiation therapy. The immediate goal is the reconstitution of hematopoietic lineages required for acute survival, i.e., myeloid and megakaryocyte lineages. Less attention has been paid to the restoration of the lymphoid lineage despite the fact that infectious disease is responsible for a significant portion of the mortality in survivors of BMT. The CD4/CD8 T lymphocyte ratio may remain abnormal for prolonged periods after transplantation, and persistent functional deficits are evidenced by various in vitro assays of immune function. Basic information that bears on the feasibility of immune reconstitution as a therapeutic approach for HIV infection is currently incomplete. For example, it is not known with certainty whether or not human multipotent stem cells can be infected by HIV-1 and whether an HIV-1-infected host can provide the proper physiological environment for the maturation of stem cells to their respective differentiated lineages. Further, it is not clear whether a source of stem cells can be identified that meets the minimal criteria for the success of a gene therapy utilizing stem cells, namely the capacity to be maintained in vitro; to be modified to resist HIV-1 infection; to home, differentiate and expand in vivo after modification; and to retain the HIV-resistant phenotype in differentiated lineages, particularly in T lymphocytes. Human and animal model studies are currently assessing the capability of CD34+ bone marrow cells to reconstitute a functional hematopoietic system in appropriately conditioned recipients. Other potential sources of multipotent stem cells have been identified, including fetal liver, yolk sac, and cord blood. There is increasing evidence to support the hypothesis that very primitive stem cells may possess characteristics favorable to engraftment in a nonautologous setting such that they may be able to persist without eliciting either a graft versus host reaction or a host versus graft reaction. Further research is needed to confirm and amplify these findings. Alternatively, the immune system might be temporarily supported in the face of disease-related immunodeficiency by the transfer of antigen-specific, ex vivo expanded lymphocytes. Recent clinical trials suggest that bone marrow transplant patients at risk of cytomegalovirus-related disease might benefit from adoptive immunotherapy with cytotoxic T cells that are capable of killing virus-infected cells. Animal and human studies are exploring a possible role for HIV-specific T cells in controlling the infection. Therefore, research on therapies that utilize cells with limited capacity for in vivo expansion will be supported under this RFA because of their potential utility in controlling HIV-1 in early stage disease and in combatting opportunistic infections. Goals and Objectives The long term goal of this RFA is to provide an experimental basis for using immune reconstitution as a therapy in individuals whose immune systems are compromised by infectious disease. This RFA focuses on HIV/AIDS for which there is need for therapies that can maintain/supplement the immune systems of infected individuals. Since it is unlikely that HIV-1 can be totally eradicated from the body by means presently available, strategies for the immune reconstitution of HIV-infected individuals will require that the transferred cells be genetically engineered to resist infection by, and/or the damaging effects of, HIV-1. Efforts are currently underway to use gene-based strategies and immune reconstitution as independent modalities to treat HIV-1 and associated infections. The objective of this RFA is to encourage preclinical research that combines the two approaches through collaborative efforts among independent investigators. Research Scope Research responsive to this RFA includes, but is not limited to, the following: Research to clarify interactions of HIV with the immune system that may bear on the successful reconstitution of infected individuals o Mechanism(s) of destruction of lymphoid tissue by HIV-1 and gene-based strategies for blocking mediators responsible for the damage. o Effects of HIV infection on thymopoiesis and multilineage engraftment of stem cells and gene-based strategies to counter detrimental effects. o Aberrant T lymphocyte homeostasis in HIV-infected individuals or in relevant animal models and gene-based therapies to normalize the CD4/CD8 ratio. o Abnormal regulation of cytokine gene expression and gene- based strategies for ameliorating the dysfunction of the cytokine network in HIV-infected individuals. Research on antiviral strategies o Design and evaluation of new gene-based antiviral strategies to be used in stem cells or other sources of immune cells. o Effects of specific antiviral strategies on the biological program of engineered multipotent stem cells. o Antiviral gene expression during differentiation of engineered stem cells in vitro and in vivo. o Isolation, modification, and testing of antigen-specific, in vitro expanded lymphocytes. Modification includes the use of genetic engineering to improve the potency, specificity, or other characteristics of the cells to enable them to function more effectively in vivo. Developmental research o Development of novel sources of multipotent stem cells that can be maintained in vitro and modified by genetic engineering techniques to resist subsequent HIV infection and that are capable of differentiating in vivo and retaining the HIV resistant phenotype in the differentiated lineages. Information bearing on the transplantability of multipotent stem cells across allo- and xeno-histocompatibility barriers is needed. o Discovery and characterization of cytokines, growth and/or differentiation factors, particularly those capable of interacting with T cell progenitors or their immediate antecedents. The discovery and development of new soluble factors are needed for the in vitro maintenance of target cells for genetic engineering, to provide sufficient material for evaluating the success and impact of experimental anti-HIV strategies at an early point, and to stimulate in vivo expansion of engineered stem cells. o Development of an in vitro colony forming assay for T cell progenitors similar to those already in use for other hematopoietic cell progenitors. Existing methodologies for quantifying T cell progenitor cells are time and labor intensive and measure progenitors indirectly by quantifying their ability to repopulate the thymus in animal models or to respond to mitogens in vitro. While it is anticipated that complete development of new strategy for immune reconstitution will not occur within the project period for all groups, a rationale for the most likely use of discoveries made or an outline of a plan for eventual clinical trials should be included. Restrictions and Exclusions Clinical trials will not be supported under this RFA. However, proposed analysis of samples acquired from NIAID-sponsored clinical trials is appropriate. Samples from ongoing trials may be made available for specific experiments. Budgetary limitations will prohibit extensive use of primates in these projects (see MECHANISM OF SUPPORT). If a therapeutic strategy is developed to an advanced stage under the RFA, every effort will be made to provide testing through NIAID-supported primate resources. SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Meetings Effective communication among IRPG investigators is very important. IRPG investigators should plan to participate in one meeting per year to be held alone or in conjunction with an NIAID-sponsored meeting such as the National Cooperative Drug Discovery Group (NCDDG) meeting. Funds to support attendance at the meeting should be included in each PI's budget. Patent Coverage Inasmuch as the development of effective treatment strategies is the objective of this effort and since the active involvement by industrial laboratories is facilitated by the existence of adequate patent coverage, it is essential that applicants provide a plan, agreed upon by the group, for obtaining patent coverage and for licensing where appropriate. In the event that the need for patent coverage is anticipated, the grantee should contact program staff listed under INQUIRIES well in advance of the application submission deadline, who will provide the details of the patent requirements and relevant regulations. The NIAID will not be a partner in any patents or royalties ensuing from this research. STUDY POPULATIONS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF NIH POLICIES CONCERNING INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY POPULATIONS NIH policy is that applicants for NIH clinical research grants and cooperative agreements are required to include minorities and women in study populations so that research findings can be of benefit to all persons at risk of the disease, disorder or condition under study; special emphasis should be placed on the need for inclusion of minorities and women in studies of diseases, disorders and conditions which disproportionately affect them. This policy is intended to apply to males and females of all ages. If women or minorities are excluded or inadequately represented in clinical research, particularly in proposed population-based studies, a clear compelling rationale must be provided. The composition of the proposed study population must be described in terms of gender and racial/ethnic group. In addition, gender and racial/ethnic issues should be addressed in developing a research design and sample size appropriate for the scientific objectives of the study. This information must be included in the form PHS 398 in Items 1-4 of the Research Plan AND summarized in Section 5, Human Subjects. Applicants are urged to assess carefully the feasibility of including the broadest possible representation of minority groups. However, NIH recognizes that it may not be feasible or appropriate in all research projects to include representation of the full array of United States racial/ethnic minority populations [i.e., Native Americans (including American Indians or Alaskan Natives), Asian/Pacific Islanders, African Americans, Hispanics]. The rationale for studies on single minority population groups must be provided. For the purpose of this policy, clinical research is defined as human biomedical and behavioral studies of etiology, epidemiology, prevention (and preventive strategies), diagnosis, or treatment of diseases, disorders or conditions, including but not limited to clinical trials. The usual NIH policies concerning research involving human subjects also apply. Basic research or clinical studies in which human tissues cannot be identified or linked to individuals are excluded. Every effort should be made to include tissues from women and racial/ethnic minorities when it is important to apply the results of the study broadly, and this should be addressed by applicants. For foreign awards, the policy on inclusion of women applies fully; since the definition of minority differs in other countries, the applicant must discuss the relevance of research involving foreign population groups to the United States' populations, including minorities. Peer reviewers will address specifically whether the research plan in the application conforms to these policies. If the representation of women or minorities in the study design is inadequate to answer the scientific question(s) addressed AND the justification for the selected study population is inadequate, it will be considered a scientific weakness or deficiency in the study design and will be reflected in assigning the priority score to the application. All applications for clinical research submitted to NIH are required to address these policies. NIH funding components will not award grants or cooperative agreements that do not comply with these policies. NOTE: Peer review groups need adequate information about the composition of proposed study populations in all applications involving human subjects. To avoid delays in review of such applications, the NIAID therefore requires that, as a minimum, the application must contain demographic data about the clinic and/or in-patient population from which study subjects (including clinical samples, materials, or fluids) will be drawn: average hospital admissions and/or clinic visits per year; percentage distribution of black/hispanic/other minority/non-minority populations; gender; etc. Studies using non-hospital populations, such as community-based studies, should provide similar data about populations in the area or region from which the study subjects will be drawn. In the absence of current data, historical demographic information and/or previous recruitment data for similar studies from the proposed study sites should be provided. LETTER OF INTENT Prospective applicants are asked to submit, by October 27, 1993, a letter of intent that includes descriptive titles of each proposed research project in the IRPG group, the names and address of the Principal Investigators and other key personnel, the participating institutions, and the number and title of this RFA. Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of the application, the information that it contains is helpful in planning for the review of expected applications. It allows NIAID staff to estimate the potential workload for reviewers and to avoid possible conflict of interest in the review process. The letter of intent is to be sent to Dr. Dianne Tingley at the address listed under INQUIRIES. APPLICATION PROCEDURES Since applications that do not address the objectives of this RFA will be considered nonresponsive and will be returned without review, potential applicants are strongly encouraged to discuss their research plans with program staff before completing their applications. Applications are to be submitted on the grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 9/91). These forms are available at most institutional offices of sponsored research and from the Office of Grants Information, Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, Westwood Building, Room 449, Bethesda, MD 20892, telephone (301) 710-0267. The RFA label available in the PHS 398 application kit must be affixed to the bottom of the face page of the application. To assure the identification of your application with this RFA, the "Yes" box must be marked in item 2a of the face page of the application and the RFA number (RFA AI-93-012) and title IMMUNE RECONSTITUTION OF HIV-1 INFECTED INDIVIDUALS (IRPG) entered in the provided spaces in item 2a. See the attached special instructions for further information on application procedures. The R01 applications constituting the proposed IRPG group must be submitted in a single package, whether or not the applications originate from the same institution. Each application in the package must be clearly identified and a cover letter must list the total number of applications submitted for the IRPG, indicating the Principal Investigator and title of each. The various applications should not be paginated or collated together like a Program Project, since each R01 application will be processed individually and assigned its own grant number by DRG, NIH. For each application, the original, three copies, and the appendix material must be put together in one bundle and clearly identified. Failure to follow the instructions regarding submission date and packaging may lead to a delay in review. The IRPG package must be sent or delivered to: Division of Research Grants National Institutes of Health Westwood Building, Room 240 Bethesda, MD 20892** At the time of submission to the Division of Research Grants (DRG), also submit two additional exact copies of the IRPG applications including appendices directly to Dr. Dianne Tingley at the address listed under INQUIRIES. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Applications that have not followed the instructions for preparation or that do not conform to the instructions contained in the PHS 398 (rev. 9/91) application kit will be judged incomplete and will be returned to the applicant. Each R01 application will be reviewed by DRG staff for completeness and by NIAID and NIDDK staff to determine responsiveness to this RFA; those individual or group applications judged to be incomplete or non-responsive will be returned to the applicant without review. To be considered responsive, the application should be directed towards the attainment of the stated programmatic goals (RESEARCH OBJECTIVES). Those applications that are complete and responsive may be subjected to a triage before or during the initial scientific peer review by a peer review group convened by the Division of Extramural Activities (DEA), NIAID to determine their scientific merit relative to the other applications received in response to this RFA. The NIAID will remove from further competition those applications judged to be noncompetitive for award and will notify the applicant and institutional business official. Those applications judged to be competitive for award will be further reviewed for scientific and technical merit by a review committee convened by the Scientific Review Program, DEA, NIAID. A second level of review will be provided by the National Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council and the National Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Advisory Council. In the event of several highly qualified applications, final funding recommendations will be based on Program priorities. Review Criteria The factors considered in evaluating the scientific merit of each application will be: o Scientific and technical merit of each individual R01 application, including originality and feasibility of the approach; o Appropriateness and adequacy of the experimental approach and methodology proposed to carry out the research; o Adequacy of plans for collaboration and communication with other investigators in the IRPG group; o Adequacy of resources and environment (e.g., facilities and equipment, shared interactive resources [cores]); o Experience, training, time commitment, and qualifications of the investigators (a commitment of at least 15 percent is recommended for Principal Investigators). Review Procedures Each R01 application will be reviewed independently for scientific and technical merit. Reviewers will read section 7 and will assess the intended collaborations just as they do the proposed collaborations in any other types of applications. As appropriate, the effectiveness and merit of the collaborations may contribute to the overall assessment of the application. In addition, budget recommendations related to the appropriateness of shared interactive resources (cores) will be reviewed for each application. Recommendations concerning core(s) in an application will be documented in administrative notes in the summary statements. These notes will assist the NIAID and NIDDK in making final decisions on each application in the context of the overall IRPG. AWARD CRITERIA The NIAID and NIDDK anticipate awarding two to four IRPG groups (six to eight R01 awards total) as a result of this RFA. The final number and specific amounts of awards to be made will depend upon consideration of the following: o Results of the initial scientific and technical merit review; o Potential contribution of the proposed research to the goals and objectives of the RFA; o Program balance; o Availability of resources. INQUIRIES It is essential that prospective applicants carefully review the RFA and the Special Insturctions for Preparing Applications for IRPGs (available from program staff listed below). NIAID and NIDDK staff welcome the opportunity to clarify issues or answer questions from potential applicants. Direct inquiries regarding scientific issues or responsiveness to: Dr. Sandra Bridges Division of AIDS National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 2C12 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-8197 Dr. Ralph Bain Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Westwood Building, Room 3A05 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 594-7556 Direct inquiries regarding the scientific review process, format of applications, and address the letter of intent to: Dr. Dianne Tingley Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 4C16 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-0818 Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters and the format of applications to: Ms. Jane Unsworth Division of Extramural Activities National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Solar Building, Room 4B22 Bethesda, MD 20892 Telephone: (301) 496-7075 Applicants who wish to use express mail or a courier service are advised to follow the carrier's requirements for showing a street address. The address for the Solar Building is: 6003 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 Schedule Letter of Intent Receipt Date: October 27, 1993 Application Receipt Date: December 8, 1993 Scientific Review Date: March 1994 Advisory Council Date: June 1994 Earliest Award Date: July 1994 AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, 93.856 - Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research and 93.855 - Immunology, Allergy and Transplantation Research. Awards are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Title IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42 USC 241 and 285) and administered under PHS grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Part 74. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. .
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||||