This notice has expired. Check the NIH Guide for active opportunities and notices.

EXPIRED


GENETIC TESTING AND THE CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF NONSYNDROMIC HEREDITARY 
HEARING IMPAIRMENT

Release Date:  December 20, 2000

PA NUMBER:  PAS-01-036

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
 (http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/)

National Human Genome Research Institute
 (http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/)
 
Letter of Intent Receipt Dates:  February 15, April 15, and August 15, 2001
Application Receipt Dates:  March 14, 2001, June 26, 2001, October 26, 2001
 
THIS PA USES THE "MODULAR GRANT" AND "JUST-IN-TIME" CONCEPTS. IT INCLUDES 
DETAILED MODIFICATIONS TO STANDARD APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS THAT MUST BE USED 
WHEN PREPARING APPLICATIONS IN RESPONSE TO THIS PA. 

PURPOSE

The National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) 
and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) invite research grant 
applications to study genetic testing as it may relate to the clinical 
management of nonsyndromic hereditary hearing impairment.  There is a broad 
range of issues that must be addressed to comprehensively determine the 
clinical validity and utility of genetic testing for hereditary hearing 
impairment.  Such issues include the correlation of genetic and audiologic 
information, the utilization of genetic information in clinical management and 
outcomes, and the impact of genetic testing on the behaviors and attitudes of 
individuals with hearing impairment and their families.

HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010

The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion 
and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010," a PHS-led national 
activity for setting priority areas.  This Program Announcement (PA), Genetic 
Testing for Hereditary Hearing Impairment, is related to one or more of the 
priority areas.  Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 
2010" at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople/.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Applications may be submitted by domestic and foreign, for-profit and non-
profit organizations, public and private, such as universities, colleges, 
hospitals, laboratories, units of State and local governments, and eligible 
agencies of the Federal government. Foreign institutions are eligible.  
Racial/ethnic minority individuals, women, and persons with disabilities are 
encouraged to apply as Principal Investigators.

MECHANISM OF SUPPORT

This PA will use the National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 award mechanism.  
Responsibility for the planning, direction, and execution of the proposed 
project will be solely that of the applicant.  The total project period for an 
application submitted in response to this PA may not exceed four years.  This 
PA has three solicitation dates. Future unsolicited competing continuation 
applications will compete with all investigator-initiated applications and be 
reviewed according to the customary peer review procedures.  The earliest 
anticipated award date is September 28, 2001.

Specific application instructions have been modified to reflect "MODULAR 
GRANT" and "JUST-IN-TIME" streamlining efforts being examined by the NIH. 
Complete and detailed instructions and information on Modular Grant 
applications can be found at 
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm


FUNDS AVAILABLE  

The NIDCD intends to commit approximately $750,000 in FY 2001 and $750,000 in 
FY 2002 to fund up to five new awards in response to this PA.  The NHGRI will 
also commit funds subject to availability.  An applicant may request a project 
period of up to four years.  Because the nature and scope of the research 
proposed may vary, it is anticipated that the size of each award will also 
vary.  Although the financial plans of the NIDCD and NHGRI provide support for 
this program, awards pursuant to this PA are contingent upon the availability 
of funds and the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications. 
At this time, there are no plans to reissue this PA.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Background

In the last decade scientists have determined the chromosomal locations of 
hundreds of genes that segregate in families with a history of deafness. 
Approximately 20 of the genes whose mutations result in non-syndromic hearing 
impairment have been identified and isolated.  Mutations in one or a few of 
these genes are important contributors to hearing impairment in some 
population groups.  One example is the GJB2 gene that encodes a gap junction 
protein, Connexin 26.  Mutations in this gene are reported to be the most 
common cause of autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness in several parts of 
the world; however, the clinical phenotype may be variable.  The degree of 
hearing loss in persons with Connexin 26-related hearing impairment varies 
even among individuals with the same GJB2 genotype, and there may be 
variability in the time of initial onset of hearing loss as well as 
variability in the rate of progression of hearing loss.

With the identification of genes that contribute to hearing function, genetic 
testing becomes technically possible. This possibility does not necessarily 
imply that genetic testing should be performed.  Prior to clinical 
implementation of genetic testing, several issues must be addressed to assess 
the clinical validity and utility of such tests.  There are many unresolved 
issues regarding the prevalence and penetrance of mutations in various 
populations, the clinical utility of knowing the specific genetic mutation 
responsible for the hearing loss, and the short and long-term impact of 
genetic testing and information on individuals and their families.  There is 
little information on the understanding of and attitudes about genetic testing 
or the level of interest in such testing, particularly among families in which 
hearing impairment has occurred.  There are unique challenges pertaining to 
genetic testing for deafness and hearing impairment because these conditions 
are not considered to be disabling or undesirable by everyone. 

The screening of newborns for hearing impairment (phenotypic) is being 
initiated throughout the nation, identifying infants with hearing loss 
immediately after birth. At present, thirty-two states have enacted 
legislation that requires universal hearing screening for newborns.  
Identification of hearing loss at birth is presenting unique challenges.  Not 
only are these infants with hearing impairment being identified much earlier 
in life, but infants with varying degrees of hearing impairment are now being 
identified, in contrast to the recent past where primarily only severe to 
profound hearing impairment was detected in the second or third year of life.  
Many unresolved issues remain for clinicians as they strive to characterize 
the auditory performance in the newborn who fails hearing screening, design 
intervention strategies to optimize communicative success, and ensure that a 
 medical home  exists for the infant with hearing impairment. 

The advances in the genetics of hereditary hearing impairment and the advances 
in the early identification of hearing impairment have now converged.  These 
advances have led some to suggest genetic testing/evaluation for all infants 
who are identified with a hearing loss at birth, and some organizations and 
individuals have embraced this idea.  For example, in January 2000 the 
American College of Medical Genetics published a policy statement on universal 
newborn hearing screening.  In it, they noted that it is  essential that all 
children with confirmed hearing loss be referred for evaluation and genetic 
counseling to a team which will typically include a qualified clinical 
geneticist and a genetic counselor.   These guidelines may be found at: 
http://www.faseb.org/genetics/acmg/pol-35.htm.

The NIDCD has recently assembled two working groups in which the extramural 
research communities have considered these issues. First was the NIDCD Working 
Group on Considerations for Developing and Implementing Genetic Diagnostic 
Tests for Hereditary Hearing Impairment and Other Communication Disorders.  
The minutes may be found at 
http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/funding/programs/hb/genetic.asp. Second was the Third 
Workshop of the NIDCD Working Group on the Early Identification of Hearing 
Impairment in which this topic was identified as a research need. Those 
minutes may be found at 
http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/funding/programs/hb/earlyid_00.asp.

This PA is designed to address the clinical relationship between genetic and 
audiologic/otologic information as well as to address the clinical validity 
and utility of genetic testing in the diagnosis, treatment and management of 
nonsyndromic hereditary hearing impairment, as well as psychosocial effects.

Other

This PA is broad in scope and nature and it is likely that these applications 
will be multidisciplinary.  Responsive applications must have a clinical 
research focus that seeks to investigate questions surrounding the use or 
implementation of genetic testing for nonsyndromic hearing loss.  There is a 
broad range of issues that must be addressed to comprehensively determine the 
utility of genetic testing for hereditary hearing impairment.  Such issues 
include the correlation of genetic and auditory information, the utilization 
of genetic information in clinical management and outcomes, and the impact of 
genetic testing on the behaviors and attitudes of individuals with hearing 
impairment.  Applications focusing solely on the prevalence and penetrance of 
genetic mutations thought to be involved in hereditary hearing impairment are 
not responsive to this PA; however, such applications are of interest to the 
NIDCD and should be submitted to the NIH on the regular R01 submission dates.

The NIDCD and NHGRI are highly committed to furthering research on the 
ethical, legal and social implications of human genetics and genomic research, 
and have recently co-sponsored two NIH program announcements requesting 
research applications in this area.  The program announcement calling for 
regular (R01) research grants in this area may be found at 
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-00-133.html and the program 
announcement calling for small (R03) research grants in this area may be found 
at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-00-132.html.

Research objectives include, but are not limited to: 

o Developing longitudinal studies of individuals with deafness/hearing 
impairment to address genotype/phenotype correlations.  This includes the 
natural history of hearing loss in individuals with various mutations in 
different populations.  Necessary phenotypic information includes degree of 
hearing loss as well as age of onset and rate of progression of hearing 
loss.  
 
o Examining the correlation and interaction of genetic information with 
audiologic/auditory information beyond the audiogram, which includes 
delineating auditory (sensory) thresholds as well as auditory perception 
(speech and supra-threshold auditory abilities).  

o Developing clinical studies to determine the value of genetic testing as a 
complement to existing clinical screening procedures, diagnostic procedures 
and management practices.  Areas of study include understanding the 
clinical validity and utility of genetic testing to screen for hearing 
impairment as well as understanding the short and long term effects of 
genetic testing for hearing impairment.

o Determining the role of genetic testing and the utilization of genetic 
information in the optimization of models of service delivery for infants 
and young children with hearing loss (i.e., screening, assessment and 
habilitation/rehabilitation protocols, as well as medical management).

o Developing adequate informed consent procedures on the use of DNA specimens 
for genetic testing and further genetic research related to hearing 
impairment. 

o Determining the impact of genetic testing and the utilization of genetic 
information on attitudes and behaviors of individuals with hearing 
impairment and their families. 

o Evaluating the psychosocial effects of genetic testing in the context of 
unique cultural issues associated with hearing impairment/deafness.

o Evaluating methods of providing education and counseling to facilitate 
comprehension of genetic information and subsequent informed decision-
making following the provision of genetic information.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Attention to informed consent issues is required.
Informational materials to aid researchers in obtaining informed consent from 
individuals with hearing impairment or deafness may be found at: 
http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/news/releases/99/inform/toc.asp 
 
Evidence of Clinical Laboratory Improvements Act (CLIA) certification is 
required for all projects in which genetic testing results will be provided to 
research participants.

In order to increase the scope and pace of the research, the NIDCD and NHGRI 
will organize a consortium of studies.  Such an arrangement will allow 
researchers to compare findings on issues common to all the projects, to 
reduce duplication of effort, and to promote sharing of information.  To 
facilitate such coordination, grantee workshops will be arranged on an annual 
basis in the Bethesda area. The budget request should take into account the 
need for funds for travel to these meetings for up to two investigators (the 
PI and one other) per year.

INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and 
their sub-populations must be included in all NIH-supported biomedical and 
behavioral research projects involving human subjects, unless a clear and 
compelling rationale and justification are provided indicating that inclusion 
is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of  
the research.  This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 
(Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). 

All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the 
UPDATED "NIH Guidelines for Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in 
Clinical Research," published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts on 
August 2, 2000 
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-048.html); 
a complete copy of the updated Guidelines are available at  
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_update.htm:  The 
revisions relate to NIH defined Phase III clinical trials and require: a) all 
applications or proposals and/or protocols to provide a description of plans 
to conduct analyses, as appropriate, to address differences by sex/gender 
and/or racial/ethnic groups, including subgroups if applicable; and b) all 
investigators to report accrual, and to conduct and report analyses, as 
appropriate, by sex/gender and/or racial/ethnic group differences.

INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

It is the policy of NIH that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) 
must be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by the 
NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them.  
This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for receipt 
dates after October 1, 1998.

All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the 
"NIH Policy and Guidelines" on the Inclusion of Children as Participants in 
Research Involving Human Subjects that was published in the NIH Guide for 
Grants and Contracts, March 6, 1998, and is available at the following URL 
address: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-024.html

Investigators also may obtain copies of these policies from the program staff 
listed under INQUIRIES.  Program staff may also provide additional relevant 
information concerning the policy.

URLS IN NIH GRANT APPLICATIONS OR APPENDICES

All applications and proposals for NIH funding must be self-contained within 
specified page limitations.  Unless otherwise specified in an NIH 
solicitation, internet addresses (URLs) should not be used to provide 
information necessary to the review because reviewers are under no obligation 
to view the Internet sites.  Reviewers are cautioned that their anonymity may 
be compromised when they directly access an Internet site.

LETTER OF INTENT

Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes a 
descriptive title of the proposed research, the name, address, and telephone 
number of the Principal Investigator, the identities of other key personnel 
and participating institutions, and the number and title of the PA.  Although 
a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into 
the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains 
allows NIDCD staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the 
review.

The letter of intent is to be sent to Amy Donahue, Ph.D., at the address 
listed under  INQUIRIES  by the letter of intent receipt dates listed in 
SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS.

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 4/98) is to be used in 
applying for these grants.  These forms are available at most institutional 
offices of sponsored research and from the Division of Extramural Outreach and 
Information Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
MSC 7910, Bethesda, MD 20892-7910, telephone 301/435-0714, email: 
[email protected].

The modular grant concept establishes specific modules in which direct costs 
may be requested as well as a maximum level for requested budgets. Only 
limited budgetary information is required under this approach. The just-in-
time concept allows applicants to submit certain information only when there 
is a possibility for an award. It is anticipated that these changes will 
reduce the administrative burden for the applicants, reviewers and Institute 
staff. The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 4/98) is to be used 
in applying for these grants, with the modifications noted below.

SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR MODULAR GRANT APPLICATIONS

BUDGET INSTRUCTIONS

Modular Grant applications will request direct costs in $25,000 modules, up to 
a total direct cost request of $250,000 per year. (Applications that request 
more than $250,000 direct costs in any year must follow the traditional PHS 
398 application instructions.) The total direct costs must be requested in 
accordance with the program guidelines and the modifications made to the 
standard PHS 398 application instructions described below:

PHS 398

FACE PAGE: Items 7a and 7b should be completed, indicating Direct Costs (in 
$25,000 increments up to a maximum of $250,000) and Total Costs [Modular Total 
Direct plus Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs] for the initial budget 
period Items 8a and 8b should be completed indicating the Direct and Total 
Costs for the entire proposed period of support.

DETAILED BUDGET FOR THE INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD - Do not complete Form Page 4 of 
the PHS 398. It is not required and will not be accepted with the application.

BUDGET FOR THE ENTIRE PROPOSED PERIOD OF SUPPORT - Do not complete the 
categorical budget table on Form Page 5 of the PHS 398. It is not required and 
will not be accepted with the application.

NARRATIVE BUDGET JUSTIFICATION - Prepare a Modular Grant Budget Narrative 
page. (See http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm for sample 
pages.) At the top of the page, enter the total direct costs requested for 
each year. This is not a Form page.

Under Personnel, list all project personnel, including their names, percent of 
effort, and roles on the project. No individual salary information should be 
provided. However, the applicant should use the NIH appropriation language 
salary cap and the NIH policy for graduate student compensation in developing 
the budget request.

For Consortium/Contractual costs, provide an estimate of total costs (direct 
plus facilities and administrative) for each year, each rounded to the nearest 
$1,000. List the individuals/organizations with whom consortium or contractual 
arrangements have been made, the percent effort of all personnel, and the role 
on the project. Indicate whether the collaborating institution is foreign or 
domestic. The total cost for a consortium/contractual arrangement is included 
in the overall requested modular direct cost amount. Include the Letter of 
Intent to establish a consortium.

Provide an additional narrative budget justification for any variation in the 
number of modules requested.

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH - The Biographical Sketch provides information used by 
reviewers in the assessment of each individual's qualifications for a specific 
role in the proposed project, as well as to evaluate the overall 
qualifications of the research team. A biographical sketch is required for all 
key personnel, following the instructions below. No more than three pages may 
be used for each person. A sample biographical sketch may be viewed at: 
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/modular/modular.htm

- Complete the educational block at the top of the form page;
- List position(s) and any honors;
- Provide information, including overall goals and responsibilities, on 
research projects ongoing or completed during the last three years.
- List selected peer-reviewed publications, with full citations;

CHECKLIST - This page should be completed and submitted with the application. 
If the F&A rate agreement has been established, indicate the type of agreement 
and the date. All appropriate exclusions must be applied in the calculation of 
the F&A costs for the initial budget period and all future budget years.

The applicant should provide the name and phone number of the individual to 
contact concerning fiscal and administrative issues if additional information 
is necessary following the initial review. 

The Applicants planning to submit an investigator-initiated new (type 1), 
competing continuation (type 2), competing supplement, or any amended/revised 
version of the preceding grant application types requesting $500,000 or more 
in direct costs for any year are advised that he or she must contact NIDCD 
program staff before submitting the application, i.e, as plans for the study 
are being developed.  Furthermore, the application must obtain agreement from 
the NIDCD staff that they will accept the application for consideration for 
award.  Finally, the applicant must identify, in a cover letter sent with the 
application, the staff member and Institute who agreed to accept assignment of 
the application.  

This policy requires an applicant to obtain agreement for acceptance of both 
any such application and any such subsequent amendment.  Refer to the NIH 
Guide for Grants and Contracts, March 20, 1998 at 
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-030.html

The title and number of the program announcement must be typed on line 2 of 
the face page of the application form and the YES box must be marked.

Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the 
Checklist, and three signed photocopies in one package to:

CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
6701 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE, ROOM 1040, MSC 7710
BETHESDA, MD  20892-7710
BETHESDA, MD  20817 (for express/courier service)

Send two additional copies of the application, and five sets of any appendices 
to: 
 
Chief, Scientific Review Branch 
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders 
6120 Executive Boulevard, Room 400-C, MSC 7180 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7180 
Rockville, MD 20852 (for express/courier service)

SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS 

Applications will be accepted under these guidelines for three receipt dates 
beginning with the March 2001 application receipt date through the October 
2001 date. 

Letter of Intent:           February 15    April 15   August 15 
Application Receipt Dates:  March 14       June 26    October 26 
NIDCD Committee Review:     June           October    February 2002 
Council Review:             September      January    May 
Earliest Funding:           September 28   April 1    August 1 

Applications must be received by the application receipt date listed above.  
If an application is received after that date, it will be reviewed in the next 
cycle. 

The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) will not accept any application in 
response to this PA that is essentially the same as one currently pending 
initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application.  The 
CSR will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one 
already reviewed. This does not preclude the submission of substantial 
revisions of applications already reviewed, but such applications must include 
an introduction addressing the previous critique.

REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS

Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed for completeness by CSR. If the 
application is not related to the goals of the PA, the applicant may be 
contacted to determine whether to return the application to the applicant or 
submit it for review in competition with unsolicited applications at the next 
review cycle.

Applications that are complete will be evaluated for scientific and technical 
merit by an appropriate peer review group convened by the NIDCD in accordance 
with the review criteria stated below.  As part of the initial merit review, 
all applications will receive a written critique and undergo a process in 
which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, 
generally the top half of the applications under review, will be discussed, 
assigned a priority score, and receive a second level review by the NDCD and 
NHGRI Advisory Councils.

Review Criteria

The goals of NIH-supported research are to advance our understanding of 
biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health.  In 
the written comments reviewers will be asked to discuss the following aspects 
of the application in order to judge the likelihood that the proposed research 
will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals.  Each of these 
criteria will be addressed and considered in assigning the overall score, 
weighting them as appropriate for each application.  Note that the application 
does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major 
scientific impact and thus deserve a high priority score.  For example, an 
investigator may propose to carry out important work that by its nature is not 
innovative but is essential to move a field forward.

(1) Significance:  Does this study address an important problem? If the aims 
of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced?  
What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive 
this field?

(2) Approach:  Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses 
adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the 
project?  Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider 
alternative tactics?

(3) Innovation:  Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or 
methods? Are the aims original and innovative?  Does the project challenge 
existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies?

(4) Investigator:  Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited 
to carry out this work?  Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience 
level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)?

(5) Environment:  Does the scientific environment in which the work will be 
done contribute to the probability of success?  Do the proposed experiments 
take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ 
useful collaborative arrangements?  Is there evidence of institutional 
support?

In addition to the above criteria, in accordance with NIH policy, all 
applications will also be reviewed with respect to the following:

o  The adequacy of plans to include both genders, minorities and their 
subgroups, and children as appropriate for the scientific goals of the 
research.  Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be 
evaluated.

o  The reasonableness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to the 
proposed research.

o  The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans, animals or the 
environment, to the extent they may be adversely affected by the project  
proposed in the application.

AWARD CRITERIA

Award criteria that will be used to make award decisions include:

o  scientific merit (as determined by peer review)
o  availability of funds
o  programmatic priorities.

INQUIRIES

Inquiries concerning this PA are encouraged.  The opportunity to clarify any 
issues or answer questions from potential applicants is welcome.

Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to:

Amy Donahue, Ph.D. 
Chief, Hearing and Balance/Vestibular Section
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders 
6120 Executive Boulevard, Room 400-C, MSC-7180 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7180 
Telephone: (301) 402-3458 
Fax: (301) 402-6251 
Email: [email protected] 

Thomas Johnson, Ph.D.
Hearing Program Officer
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders 
6120 Executive Boulevard, Room 400-C, MSC-7180 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7180 
Telephone: (301) 402-3461 
Fax: (301) 402-6251
Email: [email protected] 

Jean McEwen, J.D., Ph.D.
Program Director
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Research Program
National Human Genome Research Institute
31 Center Drive
Building 31, MSC 2033, Room B2B07
Bethesda, MD  20892-2033
Telephone:(301) 402-4997  
Fax: (301) 402-1950  
Email: [email protected]
http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/ELSI


Direct inquiries regarding review issues to:

Craig Jordan, Ph.D.
Chief, Scientific Review Branch 
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders 
6120 Executive Boulevard, Room 400-C, MSC 7180 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7180 
Telephone: (301) 496-8683
Fax: (301) 402-6250 
Email: [email protected]

Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to:

Ms. Sherry Dabney 
Grants Management Branch 
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders 
6120 Executive Boulevard, Room 400-B, MSC 7180 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7180 
Telephone: (301) 402-0909 
Fax: (301) 402-1758 
Email: [email protected] 

Ms. Jean Cahill
Division of Extramural Research
National Human Genome Research Institute
38 Library Drive, MSC 6050, Room 613  
Bethesda, MD  20892-6050
Telephone: (301) 402-1733
Fax: (301) 402-1951
Email:  [email protected]
 
AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS

This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 
93.173.  Awards are made under authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the 
Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and administered 
under NIH grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 
74 and 92.  This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review 
requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review.

The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free 
workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products.  In addition, 
Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain 
facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or 
routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood 
development services are provided to children.  This is consistent with the 
PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the 
American people.




Weekly TOC for this Announcement
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices



NIH Office of Extramural Research Logo
  Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Home Page Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS)
  USA.gov - Government Made Easy
NIH... Turning Discovery Into Health®