Participating Organization(s)	National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Components of Participating Organizations	Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Funding Opportunity Title	Enhancing Developmental Biology Research at Undergraduate Institutions Academic Research Enhancement Award (R15)
Activity Code	R15 Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA)
Announcement Type	Reissue of PAR-09-084
Related Notices	March 24, 2015 - This PA has been reissued as PAR-15-149. June 3, 2014 - Notice NOT-14-074 supersedes instructions in Section III.3 regarding applications that are essentially the same. May 30, 2013 (NOT-OD-13-074) - NIH to Require Use of Updated Electronic Application Forms for Due Dates on or after September 25, 2013. Forms-C applications are required for due dates on or after September 25, 2013. January 11, 2012 - See Notice NOT-HD-12-009. The purpose of this Notice is to clarify the Scientific Merit Review Dates, Advisory Council Review Dates, and Earliest Start Dates.
Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number	PAR-12-057
Companion FOA	None
Number of Applications	Applicants may submit more than one application, provided each application is scientifically distinct, but an applicant may have only one AREA grant at a time.] See Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s)	93.865
FOA Purpose	This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) issued by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) encourages grant applications to strengthen the developmental biology research environment at educational institutions that provide baccalaureate or advanced degrees, but that have not been major recipients of NIH support. In addition, this FOA attempts to foster the development of novel or underutilized experimental model systems, and to motivate students through exposure to and participation in research projects designed to study fundamental processes underlying normal development.

Posted Date	December 12, 2011
Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)	August 10, 2012
Letter of Intent Due Date	30 days before application due date
Application Due Date(s)	September 10, 2012, September 10, 2013, September 10, 2014, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
AIDS Application Due Date(s)	Not Applicable
Scientific Merit Review	(New Dates February/March 2013, February/March 2014, February/March 2015 per NOT-HD-12-009), Original Dates February/March 2012, February/March 2013, February/March 2014
Advisory Council Review	(New Dates May 2013, May 2014, May 2015 per NOT-HD-12-009), Original Dates May 2013, May 201 , May 2013
Earliest Start Date(s)	(New Dates July 2013, July 2014, July 2015 per NOT-HD-12-009), Original Dates July 2012, July 2012, July 2012
Expiration Date	September 11, 2014
Due Dates for E.O. 12372	Not Applicable

Required Application Instructions

It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

Part 1. Overview Information
Part 2. Full Text of the Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section II. Award Information
Section III. Eligibility Information
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
Section V. Application Review Information
Section VI. Award Administration Information
Section VII. Agency Contacts
Section VIII. Other Information

The field of developmental biology encompasses investigations into the biological processes controlling both normal and abnormal development. In order to ensure that the field of developmental biology will attract the best and brightest minds, students need to be exposed to the excitement of the research enterprise at an early stage in their training. The goal of this Announcement is therefore to stimulate developmental biology research in Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA)-eligible educational institutions that provide baccalaureate or advanced degrees, but that have not been major recipients of NIH support. The AREA grants are intended to support small-scale developmental biology research projects proposed by faculty members of eligible, domestic institutions including many small, primarily undergraduate and historically minority institutions. The intention is to create research opportunities for developmental biologists who otherwise would be unlikely to participate in NIH-funded research. Furthermore, this FOA encourages: (1) the use of novel or underutilized animal models in developmental biology research, and (2) enhanced exposure of undergraduate students (if available) to the basic concepts required to understand and conduct research on the molecular and cellular basis of embryonic development.

There is a need to increase support for developmental biology research at educational institutions primarily focused on undergraduate education. Concern is that students from such institutions tend not to be exposed to scientists conducting developmental biology research. There is evidence that participation of undergraduate students in research fosters their later participation in graduate studies (Science 316: 548-549, 2007). It follows, therefore, that expanding the number of undergraduates exposed to developmental biology ultimately will provide a larger pool of researchers motivated to study the fundamental processes underlying normal development.

There is also a need to explore new animal models to enhance our understanding of embryonic development and the genetic variations that lead to evolution. The availability of a diversity of experimental models allows investigators to choose the most advantageous system in which to address important experimental questions. Because of the conservation of developmental processes across animal phyla, results from these model systems can readily be used to advance our understanding of human embryonic development. The NIH has long been supportive of enlarging our armamentarium of biomedical model systems, and recognizes that often new models first appear in use at small institutions, where funds are limited and best used to support models that require low upkeep. Since AREA awards are limited in dollar amount, these relatively small awards are well suited to applications using inexpensive, low upkeep animal model systems. The development of underutilized and/or novel experimental model systems suitable for contributing significantly to our understanding of developmental mechanisms, while not required, is encouraged by this FOA.

This FOA will support scientifically meritorious research projects relevant to NICHD's mission, strengthen the research environment at recipient schools, and foster research experience in developmental biology for undergraduates in the basic concepts required to understand the molecular and cellular basis of embryonic development.

In addition to supporting research aimed at understanding normal embryonic development, this FOA encourages research on developmental defects of generalized body patterning and localized dysmorphic anomalies across a variety of organ systems, such as the skeletal, nervous, gut, cardiac, immune and lymphatic systems, that lead to clinically significant and major congenital structural malformations.

Research applications appropriate to this FOA include small scale, new or renewal projects investigating questions of importance to developmental biology such as, but not limited to:

• Projects that aim to elucidate the cellular, molecular, and physical mechanisms that direct the formation of the embryonic plan of multicellular organisms.
• Projects to determine the mechanisms underlying the normal development of organ primordia against which aberrations of these processes can be better understood.
• Projects to better understand the mechanism controlling the early pattern of the developing nervous system, the processes of neurogenesis, axonal guidance, and/or neural crest differentiation.
• Projects that seek to identify and characterize genes, genetic networks, and epigenetic factors that control developmental processes.
• Projects aiming to understand development of the immune and lymphatic systems.
• Projects to assess adverse genetic and/or environmental influences on development and to elucidate mechanisms by which developmental aberrations are produced.
• Testing and refinement of research techniques or animal model systems applicable to developmental biology.

Projects that utilize novel or underutilized experimental systems are encouraged but not required.

While NICHD is interested in behavioral development and intellectual disabilities related to abnormal cognitive development, these are not the focus of this specific FOA. Such applications should be submitted in response to the R15 parent FOA (see PA-12-006).

The application should include plans to involve undergraduate or graduate students in the proposed research. However, the AREA program is a research grant program, not a training or fellowship program. The application should include plans to expose students to hands-on research and should not include training plans.

Successful incorporation of student participation and maximal productivity in the special context of AREA-eligible institutions may require different approaches compared to standard NIH research projects. In order to learn from the experiences of AREA awardees, and to maximize the success and productivity of present and future awardees, PD(s)/PI(s) will be encouraged to communicate their experiences in conducting these research projects. As a part of this effort, awardees are expected to attend the 'Career Planning and Networking' workshop to be organized by the NICHD.

See Section VIII, Other Information - Required Federal Citations, for policies related to this announcement.

Funding Instrument	Grant
Application Types Allowed	New Renewal Resubmission The OER Glossary and the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types.
Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards	The number of awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations, and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
Award Budget	Applicants may request a maximum of $300,000 total direct costs plus applicable Facilities & Administrative (F&A)/indirect costs for the entire project period of up to three years. When a consortium is involved, the $300,000 direct cost limit is exclusive of consortium F&A costs. These can be requested in addition to the $300,000 direct costs limit.
Award Project Period	The entire project period is limited to three (3) years

NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.

Higher Education Institutions

• Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education
• Private Institutions of Higher Education

The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education:

• Hispanic-serving Institutions
• Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)
• Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs)
• Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions

In addition, all organizations must meet the following two criteria

• The applicant organization must offer baccalaureate or advanced degrees in biomedical sciences.
• The applicant organization may not receive research grants and/or cooperative agreements from the NIH totaling more than $6 million per year (in both direct and F&A/indirect costs) in each of 4 of the last 7 years.
  
  
  • Note that NIH research grants and cooperative agreements" includes all extramural awards designated by an activity code starting with R, P (except P20), M, T, K, or U, and also DP1, DP2, and D42. The following activity codes are excluded: C, S, and G.

Institutions with Multiple Schools or Colleges

For institutions composed of multiple schools or colleges, the criterion of financial eligibility is based on the amount of NIH research grant monies received, not by the institution (university or college) as a whole, but by the individual school/college or aggregation of "other academic components" (as defined in this section) where the PD(s)/PI(s) has an appointment (e.g., School of Medicine, College of Nursing, etc.). Thus, each of the following should be considered independently when determining the financial eligibility of the applicant organization.

• Health professional school/college: Accredited public or non-profit private school that provides training leading to a degree related to the health sciences granted by that school (e.g., PhD, MD, DDS, MPT, DC, ND, RN, or equivalent degree). The term "accredited" means a school or program that is accredited by a recognized body or bodies approved for such purpose by the Secretary of Education.
  • Includes schools or colleges of medicine, dentistry, osteopathy, pharmacy, nursing, veterinary medicine, public health, optometry, allied health, chiropractic, naturopathy and podiatry.
• Other academic component: Once the health professional schools have been excluded, other academic components refers to all remaining schools, colleges, and free-standing institutes of the institution taken as a SINGLE component.

To determine the eligibility of an institution, applicants should consult the list of ineligible schools/components on the AREA program website at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/area.htm. If the name of the school does not appear on the list, it may be eligible to apply for AREA grants. Applicants should check with their own institutions if unsure.

An AREA grant is permitted to have a subcontract to a non-AREA-eligible institution. However, applicants should keep the goals of the AREA program in mind when preparing the application, which include strengthening the research environment of the institution and exposing students to research.

Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.

Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are not allowed.

Applicant organizations must complete the following registrations as described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. Applicants must have a valid Dun and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number in order to begin each of the following registrations.

• Central Contractor Registration (CCR) must maintain an active registration, to be renewed at least annually
• Grants.gov
• eRA Commons

All Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) must also work with their institutional officials to register with the eRA Commons or ensure their existing eRA Commons account is affiliated with the eRA Commons account of the applicant organization.

All registrations must be completed by the application due date. Applicant organizations are strongly encouraged to start the registration process at least 4-6 weeks prior to the application due date.

Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with his/her organization to develop an application for support. Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support.

For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PD(s)/PI(s), visit the Multiple Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide.

For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PD(s)/PI(s), all PD(s)/PI(s) must have a primary faculty appointment at an AREA-eligible institution.

To be eligible for an AREA grant, the PD(s)/PI(s) may not be:

• The PD(s)/PI(s) of any active NIH research grant, including another AREA grant, at the time of award of an AREA grant (although he or she may be one of the project personnel for an active NIH grant held by another PD(s)/PI(s)).
• Awarded more than one AREA grant at a time (although he or she may hold successive new or competing renewal AREA grants).

This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.

NIH will not accept any application in response to this FOA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial peer review unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. NIH will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed. Resubmission applications may be submitted, according to the NIH Policy on Resubmission Applications from the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide.

Applicants must download the SF424 (R&R) application package associated with this funding opportunity using the Apply for Grant Electronically button in this FOA or following the directions provided at Grants.gov.

It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed in this funding opportunity announcement to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

For information on Application Submission and Receipt, visit Frequently Asked Questions Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.

By the date listed in Part 1. Overview Information, prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:

• Descriptive title of proposed research
• Name, address, and telephone number of the PD(s)/PI(s)
• Names of other key personnel
• Participating institutions
• Number and title of this funding opportunity

The letter of intent should be sent to:

Mahua Mukhopadhyay, PhD
Developmental Biology, Genetics and Teratology Branch (DBGT)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
6100 Executive Boulevard, Building 6100, Room 4B01B
Bethesda, MD 20892-7510
Rockville, MD 20852-7510 (for express mail or courier service)
Telephone: 301-435-6886
Email: mukhopam@mail.nih.gov

The forms package associated with this FOA includes all applicable components, mandatory and optional. Please note that some components marked optional in the application package are required for submission of applications for this FOA. Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide to ensure you complete all appropriate optional components.

All page limitations described in the SF424 Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.

In addition to the information requested in the instructions, provide the following information as a PDF attachment in the Facilities & Other Resources section on the Research and Related Other Project Information form.

• A profile of available students of the applicant school/academic component and any information or estimate of the number who have obtained the baccalaureate degree and gone on to obtain an academic or professional doctoral degree in the health-related sciences during the last five years.
• A description of the special characteristics of the school/academic component that make it appropriate for an AREA grant, where the goals of the AREA program are to: (1) provide support for meritorious research; (2) strengthen the research environment of schools that have not been major recipients of NIH support; and (3) expose available undergraduate and/or graduate students in such environments to research. Include a description of the likely impact of an AREA grant on the PD(s)/PI(s) and the research environment of the school/academic component.
• Although it is expected that the majority of the research will be directed by the applicant investigator and conducted at the grantee institution, limited use of special facilities or equipment at another institution is permitted. For any proposed research sites other than the applicant institution, provide a brief description of the resources. Collaborations with other investigators are also permitted if complementary expertise is required to accomplish the proposed specific aims.
• If relevant, a statement of institutional support for the proposed research project (e.g., equipment, laboratory space, release time, matching funds, etc.).

In addition to the information requested in the instructions, provide the following information in the Biographical Sketch that is attached to the Research and Related Senior/Key Person Profile form.

• The PD(s)/PI(s) should include a summary of his or her previous and/or current experience in supervising students in research in the Personal Statement.
• The PD(s)/PI(s) should indicate which peer-reviewed publications involved students under his or her supervision.

The total budget for all years of the proposed project must be requested in Budget Period 1. Do not complete Budget Periods 2 or 3. They are not required and will not be accepted with the application.

Complete only Budget Period 1 of either the PHS398 Modular Budget component or the R&R Budget component.

• Applicants submitting an application with direct costs of $250,000 or less (total for all years, excluding consortium Facilities and Administrative [F&A] costs) must use the PHS398 Modular Budget component.
• Applicants submitting an application with direct costs of $250,001 - $300,000 (total for all years) must use the Research & Related (R&R) Budget component.

PHS398 Modular Budget Component (direct costs of $250,000 or less):

Follow all instructions in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide, noting the following specifications for R15 applications.

Budget Period 1: Direct Costs

• Direct Costs less Consortium F&A: Select the appropriate dollar amount from the drop-down list. This number must NOT EXCEED $250,000.
• Consortium F&A: If applicable, enter the actual consortium F&A (e.g., $3,271).
• Total Direct Costs: This field auto-calculates so no data entry is required.

Budget Period 1: Indirect Costs:

• If the F&A rate agreement has been established, indicate the type of agreement and the date. All appropriate exclusions must be applied in the calculation of the F&A costs.
• If the F&A rate has not been established, enter None-will negotiate and include information for a proposed rate. Use the budget justification if additional space is needed.

Budget Justification: Please attach the Personnel Justification and Consortium Justification. If the requested budget requires any additional justification, attach an Additional Narrative Justification.

• Personnel Justification: Follow all instructions in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide. Since a primary objective of the AREA program is to expose students to meritorious research, PD(s)/PI(s) should include undergraduate (preferably, if available) and/or graduate students in the proposed research to the extent practical. If students are available and will be involved in the research, indicate aspects of the proposed research in which they will participate. If participating students have not yet been individually identified, the number and academic level of those to be involved should be provided. If there are any Consultants for the project, provide their names, organizational affiliations, and the services they will perform.
• Consortium Justification: Follow all instructions in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide, but note that the Letter of Intent to establish a consortium must also be included in the Consortium Justification attachment.

R&R Budget Component (direct costs of $250,001 to $300,000):

Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, noting the following specifications for R15 applications.

Budget Period 1: Direct Costs

• Direct Costs less Consortium F&A: This number must NOT EXCEED $300,000.
• Consortium F&A: If applicable, enter the actual consortium F&A (e.g., $3,271).

Budget Period 1: Indirect Costs:

• If the F&A rate agreement has been established, indicate the type of agreement. All appropriate exclusions must be applied in the calculation of the F&A costs.
• If the F&A rate has not been established, enter None-will negotiate and include information for a proposed rate. Use the budget justification if additional space is needed.

Budget Justification: Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. Since a primary objective of the AREA program is to expose students to meritorious research, PD(s)/PI(s) should include undergraduate (preferably, if available) and/or graduate students in the proposed research to the extent practical. If students are available and will be involved in the research, indicate aspects of the proposed research in which they will participate. If participating students have not yet been individually identified, the number and academic level of those to be involved should be provided.

All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:

Resource Sharing Plan

Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans (Data Sharing Plan, Sharing Model Organisms, and Genome Wide Association Studies(GWAS) as provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide..

Appendix

Do not use the Appendix to circumvent page limits. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates. Applicants are encouraged to submit in advance of the deadline to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission.

Organizations must submit applications via Grants.gov, the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies. Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration.

Applicants are responsible for viewing their application in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.

Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.

All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.

Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.

For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit Applying Electronically.

Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the SF 424(R&R) Application Package. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD(s)/PI(s) Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH.

The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the Central Contractor Registration (CCR). Additional information may be found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

See more tips for avoiding common errors.

Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review, NIH. Applications that are incomplete will not be reviewed.

Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in NOT-OD-10-115.

Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. As part of the NIH mission, all applications submitted to the NIH in support of biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.

For this particular announcement, note the following:

The objectives of the R15 program are to (1) provide support for meritorious research, (2) strengthen the research environment of schools that have not been major recipients of NIH support, and (3) expose available undergraduate and graduate students in such environments to meritorious research. Preliminary data are not required for R15 application; however, they may be included if available.

Reviewers will provide an overall impact/priority score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project tomake an important scientific contribution to the research field(s) involved, to provide research opportunities to students, and to strengthen the research environment of the institution, , in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).

Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.

Significance

Does the project address an important problem or a barrier to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field? If funded, will the AREA award have a substantial effect on the school/academic component in terms of strengthening the research environment and exposing students to research?

Investigator(s)

Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, or in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD(s)/PI(s), do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project? Do the PD(s)/PI(s) have suitable experience in supervising students in research?

Innovation

Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?

Approach

Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed?

If the project involves clinical research, are the plans for 1) protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion of minorities and members of both sexes/genders, as well as the inclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?

Does the application provide sufficient evidence that the project can stimulate the interests of students so that they consider a career in the biomedical or behavioral sciences?

Environment

Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Does the application demonstrate the likely availability of well-qualified students to participate in the research project? Does the application provide sufficient evidence that students have in the past or are likely to pursue careers in the biomedical or behavioral sciences?

As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact/priority score, but will not give separate scores for these items.

Protections for Human Subjects

For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.

For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Human Subjects Protection and Inclusion Guidelines.

Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children

When the proposed project involves clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion of minorities and members of both genders, as well as the inclusion of children. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Human Subjects Protection and Inclusion Guidelines.

Vertebrate Animals

The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following five points: 1) proposed use of the animals, and species, strains, ages, sex, and numbers to be used; 2) justifications for the use of animals and for the appropriateness of the species and numbers proposed; 3) adequacy of veterinary care; 4) procedures for limiting discomfort, distress, pain and injury to that which is unavoidable in the conduct of scientifically sound research including the use of analgesic, anesthetic, and tranquilizing drugs and/or comfortable restraining devices; and 5) methods of euthanasia and reason for selection if not consistent with the AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animal Section.

Biohazards

Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.

Resubmissions

For Resubmissions, the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.

Renewals

For Renewals, the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.

Revisions

Not Applicable

As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact/priority score.

Applications from Foreign Organizations

Not Applicable.

Select Agent Research

Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).

Resource Sharing Plans

Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable: 1) Data Sharing Plan (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm); 2) Sharing Model Organisms (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-04-042.html); and 3) Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-088.html).

Budget and Period of Support

Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.

Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s), in accordance with NIH peer review policy and procedures, using the stated review criteria. Review assignments will be shown in the eRA Commons.

As part of the scientific peer review, all applications:

• May undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact/priority score.
• Will receive a written critique.

Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications . Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development (NACHHD) Council. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:

• Scientific and technical merit of the proposed project as determined by scientific peer review.
• Availability of funds.
• Relevance of the proposed project to program priorities.

After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD(s)/PI(s) will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons.

Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization for successful applications. The NoA signed by the grants management officer is the authorizing document and will be sent via email to the grantee’s business official.

Awardees must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions. Selection of an application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs.

Any application awarded in response to this FOA will be subject to the DUNS, CCR Registration, and Transparency Act requirements as noted on the Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants website.

All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the NoA. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Grantees, and Activities. More information is provided at Award Conditions and Information for NIH Grants.

Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award

Not Applicable

Progress reports for multiyear funded (MYF) awards are due annually on or before the anniversary of the budget/project period start date of the award. The reporting period for a MYF progress report is the calendar year preceding the anniversary date of the award. Information on the content of the progress report and instructions on how to submit the report through the eRA Commons are posted at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/myf.htm.

A final progress report, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Transparency Act), includes a requirement for awardees of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards issued in FY2011 or later. All awardees of applicable NIH grants and cooperative agreements are required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) available at www.fsrs.gov on all subawards over $25,000. See the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information on this reporting requirement.

We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.

Grants.gov Customer Support (Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and submission, downloading or navigating forms)
Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726
Email: support@grants.gov

GrantsInfo (Questions regarding application instructions and process, finding NIH grant resources)
Telephone 301-710-0267
TTY 301-451-5936
Email: GrantsInfo@nih.gov

eRA Commons Help Desk(Questions regarding eRA Commons registration, tracking application status, post submission issues)
Phone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)
TTY: 301-451-5939
Email: commons@od.nih.gov

Mahua Mukhopadhyay, PhD
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Telephone: 301-435-6886
Email: mukhopam@mail.nih.gov

Examine your eRA Commons account for review assignment and contact information (information appears two weeks after the submission due date).

Bryan Clark, MBA
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Telephone: 301 435-6975
Email: clarkb1@mail.nih.gov

Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.

Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92.